Loading...
Item 6E13 S0UTHLA1<,.,E CITY OF Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT April 13, 2011 CASE NO: ZA10 -069 PROJECT: Revised Concept Plan for the Garden District Residences at Southlake Town Square EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Cooper & Stebbins (applicant) is requesting approval of a Revised Concept Plan for up to 130 new "Garden District" residences and 10 Brownstone residential lots on approximately 10.7 vacant acres located in Southlake Town Square east of Central Avenue and north of Main Street. SPIN # 8. CHANGES SINCE APRIL 5 MEETING: This item was discussed at the City Council meeting on April 5, 2011. The following chart shows some of City Council's requests of the applicant and the applicants response to date: Council Concern / Request Applicant Response Alley width. Consider widening the alley On the resubmitted Concept Plan, the alley between the proposed Garden District and the remains 16' in width. The applicant is willing existing Brownstones on Main Street. to widen the alley to 20', however the landscape buffer would decrease to just 5' as a result. The applicant will address this and some of the Brownstone residents' concerns at the meeting. Architectural regulations. Provide clearer Language on the face of the concept plan as architectural and masonry regulations for the well as in the ordinance itself has be Garden District, insuring they are proposed. complimentary to the Brownstones. Parking garages. Consider ingress /egress From the applicant: "Due to grades, it does options to parking garages and connecting the not appear feasible to connect Garage 6 garages. (Buildings 1 & 2) to Garage 7 (Buildings 3,6 & 7). However we are continuing to study the feasibility of connecting Garage 6 to Garage 5, which may have other advantages beyond just parking and circulation." The applicant will address this at the meeting. On- street parking ratio. Consider increasing Twenty -three (23) parallel parking spaces on- street parking for visitors. have been added to the north side of Park Ridge Blvd. Additionally, 10 units have been eliminated from the plan, thus bringing the overall parking ratio closer to 2.7 spaces per unit. The applicant will address the difficulties Case No. Attachment A ZA10 -069 Page 1 REQUEST DETAILS: The area of the revised concept plan is currently planned for 67 brownstones residences similar to those already constructed on Main Street and Summit Avenue. A 2.81 acre drainage /detention area is also included in the concept plan boundary, allowing the applicant to shift some of that previously- approved open space credit to the proposed Garden District. Garden District Residences The Garden District proposal includes three three -story buildings interior to the site and seven three -story buildings on the perimeter. The ten buildings would contain a central clubhouse and up to 130 residential units ranging from about 1,500 square feet to 3,000 square feet in floor area, with an average of over 2,000 square feet. Individual residences could be combined either horizontally or vertically to create larger residences as desired. Also proposed are 296 parking spaces in a system of six gated subsurface garage lots. Reconfigured Brownstone Lots The applicant is also proposing to reconfigure twelve existing single - family Brownstone lots on Park Ridge Blvd. On that street's east side, eleven lots are proposed to be decreased nine. Eight of those lots are proposed to be wider, two -story units with deeper front yards (15') and three -car garages below the main level, with access from the alley. Two other Brownstone lots (one on the east side of Park Ridge Blvd and one on the west side) are included in the concept plan to allow for larger, custom -built units. In conjunction with this request, the applicant is requesting a text amendment to Section 37 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended (Case # ZA10 -068), providing Case No. Attachment A ZA10 -069 Page 2 involved with adding angled /head -in parking on Park Ridge at the meeting. Fourth floor units. Eliminate the fourth floor The applicant has agreed to remove the of the three interior buildings. fourth floor from the three interior buildings, reducing the number of Garden District units by 10 from 140 to 130. Elevators. Clarify that "semi- private" elevators Staff had not received any ordinance in the proposed ordinance will serve up to six language on this item at time of printing. Any units or up to three pairs of units. possible changes may be addressed at the City Council meeting. Video or photo examples. Provide video or At time of printing, the applicant had no video photo examples to help define the intent of the or photo examples to provide. elevators. Limit 1,500 SF units. Consider limiting the The applicant is willing to limit the 1,500 SF number of 1,500 square foot units to a certain unit type to a maximum of 25% of the total number per building. units. Unit mix table. Provide a unit mix table with A conceptual unit mix table has been variants for the project. provided and is included in this report, however this may change during the site plan stage. Phasing plan. Provide a phasing plan for the Multiple sheets, entitled "Phasing Plan" were buildings and amenities /open space. submitted for Council's review and are included in the City Council packet. Meet with Brownstone Homeowners. Get The applicant has indicated that they have feedback from the Brownstones homeowners met with Brownstone residents and have also on Council's revision requests. emailed the Brownstone HOA Board for distribution to other Brownstone owners. REQUEST DETAILS: The area of the revised concept plan is currently planned for 67 brownstones residences similar to those already constructed on Main Street and Summit Avenue. A 2.81 acre drainage /detention area is also included in the concept plan boundary, allowing the applicant to shift some of that previously- approved open space credit to the proposed Garden District. Garden District Residences The Garden District proposal includes three three -story buildings interior to the site and seven three -story buildings on the perimeter. The ten buildings would contain a central clubhouse and up to 130 residential units ranging from about 1,500 square feet to 3,000 square feet in floor area, with an average of over 2,000 square feet. Individual residences could be combined either horizontally or vertically to create larger residences as desired. Also proposed are 296 parking spaces in a system of six gated subsurface garage lots. Reconfigured Brownstone Lots The applicant is also proposing to reconfigure twelve existing single - family Brownstone lots on Park Ridge Blvd. On that street's east side, eleven lots are proposed to be decreased nine. Eight of those lots are proposed to be wider, two -story units with deeper front yards (15') and three -car garages below the main level, with access from the alley. Two other Brownstone lots (one on the east side of Park Ridge Blvd and one on the west side) are included in the concept plan to allow for larger, custom -built units. In conjunction with this request, the applicant is requesting a text amendment to Section 37 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended (Case # ZA10 -068), providing Case No. Attachment A ZA10 -069 Page 2 definitions for "Garden District" and "Garden District Residences" as well as development regulations for such development. SITE DATA SUMMARY: ACTION NEEDED ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACT: Case No. ZA10 -069 This is a concept plan proposal. Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council review and approval of a site plan, including elevations, is required before construction may commence. ' Parking requirements based on proposed text amendment to Section 37 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider recommendation of Concept Plan to City Council (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information — Link to Presentation (D) SPIN Report: December 10, 2010 (E) Review Summary No. 2, dated April 13, 2011 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map (G) Surrounding Property Owners Responses (H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) Ken Baker (817)748 -8067 Clayton Comstock (817)748 -8269 Attachment A Page 3 ME M0 Gross Acreage 10.68 acres 10.68 acres Area of Open Space 2.35 acres 2.35 acres % Open Space 22% 22% Number of Stories 3 and 4 3 Max. Building Height 52' 52' Garden District Lots 44 12 Single Family Residential Lots 10 10 Garden District Units 140 130 Reconfigured Brownstone Units 10 10 Total Dwelling Units 150 140 Min. SF per Garden District Unit 1,500 SF 1,500 SF Residential Density — 106 acre Southlake Town Square boundary 1.84 du /acre 1.75 du /acre Residential Density — 13.79 acre Residential Boundary Only 14.14 du /are 13.41 du /acre Total Building Pad Area 126,648 SF 126,648 SF Total Floor Area 407,557 SF 385,869 SF Required Resident Parking 300 280 Provided Resident Parking 326 308 Required Visitor Parking 57 75 Provided Visitor Parking 67 90 ' Parking requirements based on proposed text amendment to Section 37 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider recommendation of Concept Plan to City Council (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information — Link to Presentation (D) SPIN Report: December 10, 2010 (E) Review Summary No. 2, dated April 13, 2011 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map (G) Surrounding Property Owners Responses (H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) Ken Baker (817)748 -8067 Clayton Comstock (817)748 -8269 Attachment A Page 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Brownstones at Town Square, LP APPLICANT: Cooper & Stebbins PROPERTY SITUATION: Specifically 351 Central Ave, 202 — 232 Park Ridge Rd and 203 — 227 Park Ridge Rd; more generally being north of the existing Brownstone development and east of Central Ave. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 2A5E, Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481; Lots 1 — 16, Block 25, Southlake Town Square Brownstones Addition; Lot 24R & Lots 25 — 35, Block 24, Southlake Town Square Brownstones Addition; and Lot 1, Block 28, Southlake Town Square Brownstones Addition. LAND USE CATEGORY: Town Center HISTORY: Key approvals associated with Southlake Town Square and residential development in Town Square: January 7, 1997 (ZA96 -145): Original "PUD" Zoning & Concept Plan approved for Southlake Town Square; August 19, 1997 (ZA97 -099 and ZA97 -100): Southlake Town Square Phase I Development Plan and Site Plan approved; February 4, 2003 (ZA02 -104); "DT" Downtown District Zoning & Concept Plan was approved; April 1, 2003 (ZA03 -013) Specific Use Permit for the Brownstone residential units was approved. October 5, 2004 (ZA04 -066 & ZA04 -067): Revised Concept Plan & Site Plan for Southlake Town Square's Grand Avenue District was approved; CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held Monday, December 10, 2010. A SPIN Meeting Report for that meeting is included as Attachment "D" of this report. SOUTHLAKE 2025 PLAN: Consolidated Land Use Plan The "Town Center" designation provides the following guidelines for residential uses: • Residential uses are to be located between the proposed office or retail uses and existing residential neighborhoods. These uses are intended to provide a lower intensity transition between existing neighborhoods and commercial uses. • Residential uses should be well integrated with proposed open space and other civic uses to create a sense of place. Case No. Attachment A ZA10 -069 Page 4 • They should also be integrated with proposed commercial uses in a manner that provides internal automobile and pedestrian access to convenience commercial uses. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN: WATER & SEWER: DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: TREE PRESERVATION & LANDSCAPE: STAFF COMMENTS: • Residential uses are recommended to be to the density and scale that is appropriate based on the context and character of the proposed overall development. Traffic Impact: Luxury Condominium /Townhouse Use (ITE # 233) Use Units Vtpd* AM -IN AM -OUT PM -IN PM -OUT Luxury Condominium / Townhouse 67 393 5 24 23 11 EXISTING APPROVAL Luxury Condominium / Townhouse 140 820 10 50 49 24 PROPOSED Net Difference 83 486 6 31 29 15 Vehicle Trips per Day Street sidewalks are shown along all public street frontages on the concept plan, as well as an extensive internal sidewalk system. All necessary public water and sewer infrastructure are currently in place for this development. The developer's original drainage plan with the Brownstones to send runoff to a detention pond north of the site remains in effect with this concept plan. More detailed drainage analysis will be required with a site plan submittal. There are no existing protected trees on the site except those that he developer has planted, including Live Oaks and Magnolias. Although there is no plant material details provided, the preliminary landscape design is consistent with the Town Square theme. Attached is Staff Review Summary No. 2, dated April 13, 2010. N.1Community Development MEMO12010 Cases1069 - RCP - The Garden Disctrict at South lake Town SquarelStaff ReportlStaffRptTemplate 2010- 02- 03.doc Case No. ZA10 -069 Attachment A Page 5 Vicinity Map Southlake Town Square Area of "DT" Downtown Zoning District Amendment (ZA10 -068) Area of Revised Concept Plan for "The Garden District at Southlake Town Square" (ZA10 -069) 500 1.000 2,000 � Feet Case No. Attachment B ZA10 -069 Page 1 D� j N O (D o z 0') O W I/ o N °Ir OWNER: APPLICANT: ENGINEER: ca.um•a ct LJe�w Met, a a' aN. BROxN —M AT TOM SWARE, LP. G.I. k STERBINS MAIN REGIS1ERm ENGM�ING FIRM F -SM SURE 240 1256 MAN S­ 4 — NORTH CENTR& EXPRESSWAY SUITE 1100 SWTHLAKE. TEXAS 76N2 MU_A TEXAS I N / < PROPOSED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE mxeD DT uTD To� GexTER �// 1 / "yv / Eom ! DT uD -TONN N L4�TIX PROPOSW CONCEPT PUN LIMITS / ` A �k unR 1 O11 cl ` �WO=iORN CENIF SUS -AND, LP. ` xsmuNEx ` INS T PROPOSED GARDEN DISTRICT OMITS dDFR&dQM Gva®IE] O � - Exia O - x HMAG Pawment - e oeceratiw Powra D ' fl1 0 (D C4 � (D '* Lk N N O O m .• r O 3 s 0 0 0 M.71M Mill., 0 D ' fl1 0 (D C4 � (D '* Lk N N O O m .• r O 3 s 0 D0 j N 0 o z 0') o W e D S � (D C4 � GWNER: APPLICANT: ENGINEER: BROWNSTONES Al TOWN —E. L.P. COOPER k STEBBINS TEXAS t 256 N 5 MAIN —T. -TE 240 SUITE 240 4144 N TN CENTRAL E%PRESSWAT WITE 11 IEL. B1] -329 -0400 FAX 817-1-8717 TEL, 81-8400 FAK 91]- 251 -5]1] TEL 21FB24 R366] FAR J ® 214- 824E]064 I i ZONED DT `D=TOWN DENIER PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN TPADT 0 ✓ � Ram "ooE� —1 ZON C3 ux0, LP, ` IN wD =rowN cFxTFR ZONED DT , IxsTRUMExR1 T TosOKZa2, ` ` WD =TORN CENTER \ PROPOSED GARDEN DISTRCT DMITS le ZONED C3 LUO =TONN CENT aT. I " P.xT�.T 9ss I I I © Ncta� II uee slmnor Mo[erlaie. Ccetrtone, Etc.) W' m000DDetr� �� F - —oraerve N o 0 0 0 0 N o D� j N O fD o Z rn O W D .�r .�r 0 a1 M C4 3 N '* SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE "GARDEN DISTRICT" RESIDENCES - PROJECT DATA PARKING CAII GROSS BUILDING NUMBER NETS S.F. GROSS S.F PARKING RATIO REQ'D REQ'D UNIT NET S.F. S.F. TOTAL PER UNIT PER UNIT REQ'D RESIDENT VISITOR TYPE TYPE PARKING PARKING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Other A 1849 2011 6 9 6 5 6 3 6 41 75,809 82,451 2.00 Per Unit 82 A -ALT 1833 1994 3 3 6 10,998 11,964 2.00 Per unit 12 B 2199 2499 6 5 6 3 3 6 29 63,771 72,471 2.00 Per Unit 58 B -ALT 1992 2422 3 3 6 11,952 14,532 2.00 Per Unit 12 C 2483 2757 3 3 6 14,898 16,542 2.00 Per Unit 12 65 D 1896 1970 3 6 6 3 18 34,128 35,460 2.00 Per Unit 36 E 2184 2457 6 5 6 0 18 39,312 44,226 2.00 Per unit 36 F 2946 3081 3 3 8,838 9.243 2.00 Per Unit 6 G 1556 1798 3 3 4,668 5,394 2.00 Per Unit 6 Subtotal 2034 . 2,248 12 12 12 23 12 t 12 12 12 18 130 264,374 292,283 260 Future 4109 5783 8 8 32,872 46,264 2.00 Per Unit 16 Brownstone Future 6000 8000 2 2 12,000 16,000 2.00 Per Unit 4 10 Brownstone Subtotal 4,487 6.226 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 44,872 62,264 20 Totals 2,209 2.532 12 12 12 23 12 5 12 12 12 18 10 1 140 309,246 354,547 280 75 RESIDENT PARKING RESIDENT PARKING PROVIDED PER UNIT 308 SPACES 1140 UNITS = 2.2 PER UNIT 308 PROVIDED VISITOR TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED PER UNIT 398 SPACES / 140 UNITS = 2.84 PER UNIT PARKING 90 PROVIDED TOTAL PARKING 1500 square foot units (Jnit G) shall not exceed 25% of the project total 398 PROVIDED The architecture of the buildings in the Garden District will be compatible with the Brownstones, and use similar materials (brick, cast stone, etc.) TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 355 4.11.2011 C 3 X fl1 N W 0 SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. Formal application pending PROJECT NAME: Garden District at Southlake Town Square SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN # 8 MEETING DATE: December 6, 2010; 7 PM MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX Training Rooms 3A — 3C TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Twenty -three (23) • SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Pattie Minder (# 8), Ron Evans (# 10), Ray Tremain (# 9), and Vic Awtry (# 7) APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Frank Bliss, Cooper & Stebbins STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough, Deputy Director Planning & Development Services, (817)748 -8072; dkillough(a southlake.tx. us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation • The property is described as the residual Brownstone land located on the east side of Central Avenue just north of the existing Brownstones; this piece is approximately 8 acres. Development Details • The applicant is proposing a revised concept plan called The Garden District at Southlake Town Square. The goal is to re -start development at the Brownstones, and finish the district in a manner that is additive to the existing Brownstone residents, Southlake Town Square and the Southlake community. The preliminary application that has been filed is based on development of a neighborhood of Brownstone -like 3 -story buildings, in which individual floors are owned under a "stacked flat" design. Two streets have been eliminated, allowing homes to face into a series of Case No. Attachment D ZA10 -069 Page 1 internal private open spaces. Secured parking is provided underground, increasing the amount of open space. Each "pair" of Brownstones is served by a central elevator and stair, allowing direct access to individual flats on each level. The "stacked flat" design will incorporate from 3 to 12 residences per building. Up to 160 "for sale" residences are proposed. Individual flats can be combined either horizontally or vertically, to create larger homes as desired. The new buildings will compliment and be compatible with existing Brownstones along Main St. and Summit Ave. The 1 St floor of the buildings are slightly elevated above the adjacent sidewalk, providing privacy to the residents. Elevator and stair foyers are provided along the street front (or in certain cases from the internal private walkways), providing direct, controlled access to building residents and guests. Residents will be able to rise by elevator directly into their own private vestibule and the front door to their home. Two parking spaces will be provided for each residence in gated, private underground parking. Additional guest parking will be provided on street at the ratio of one space for every 3 flats. Building design facilitates well thought out, spacious floor plans and amenities. Residences will include a mix of 1- and 2- bedroom flats, ranging from 1,500 square feet to 3,000 square feet, with an average in the order of 2,000 square feet, consistent with market feedback. Main living areas will face into secluded settings designed around a series of individually landscaped areas with gardens, fountains, pathways, and public art. Pathways will provide connectivity to the downtown commercial areas, and extend Town Square's walking trail system. Private open space is being relocated from Block 19, enhancing landscape opportunities within the District as well as future commercial development potential along SH 114. The grounds will include a club house and central square which will provide a gathering place for residents to meet, entertain and hold other functions. Open space design and functionality is being approached with the goal of adding value to existing Brownstone residences as well as future development. First floor residences will enjoy spacious patios that feature both covered and open air, landscaped areas adjacent to the Garden District's private open space. Second and Third floor residents will enjoy large, walk -out balconies. A 5 -foot landscape bed will run along the front of the buildings at the street, creating a streetscape similar to that of the Brownstones. Energy Star and LEED for Homes and /or similar certifications will be sought for each building. Cooper & Stebbins is also considering seeking a broader certification under the LEED ND or similar programs which could encompass all of Town Square under a "green" downtown designation. Formal application to the City is anticipated for January 2011. QUESTIONS / CONCERNS Taking away surface parking; will you have more parking? Case No. Attachment D ZA10 -069 Page 2 o Yes, there is sufficient underground and structure parking planned. • Are you going to use the commercial development along SH 114 as noise abatement? o That development will help, however, the internal environment proposed provides movement and sound that distracts from the outside. • These will be like the Brownstones? o Very similar; they are three -story like the Brownstones, however, each flat is all on one level. • What are the ceiling heights? o Eleven to twelve feet. • How much will these cost per square foot? o They will start at $220 but will depend on customizing; expecting around '/2 million per flat. • Which phase would be first? o Off Central east, then northwest — working east. • What will I see from my Brownstone? o An aesthetically pleasing building with landscaping. • So no windows or decks? o No, they will all be internal. • Are the air conditioners on the roof or ground? o Not sure yet but they will definitely be screened. • Will there be any public parking? o Parking will be available around the perimeter; nothing inside. We do not anticipate any parking issues. Each unit will have 2 spaces allotted in the underground parking area. • Will there be storage space available? o Yes • Are you planning on building a scale model of the project? o If we can get approval of this concept plan and meet appropriate partners. • Will there be a monthly fee? o Yes, a fee will be required for grounds maintenance. • What do you plan to do with the dirt from the underground garage? o Engineering will be done... we may fill some areas and some may be exported. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment D ZA10 -069 Page 3 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA10 -069 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 04/13/2011 Project Name: Concept Plan — Garden District Residences at Southlake Town Square APPLICANT: Cooper & Stebbins Frank Bliss ENGINEER: Brockette Davis Drake, Inc. 1256 Main St; Suite 240 4144 N. Central Exwy; Suite 1100 Southlake, TX 76092 Dallas, TX 75204 Phone: (817) 329 -8400 Phone: (214)824 -3647 Fax: (817) 251 -8717 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 04/13/11 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT CLAYTON COMSTOCK AT (817) 748 -8269 OR DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748 -8072. 1. Consider that the 10 reconfigured Brownstone lots are not part of the Garden District as defined by the proposed text amendment and are subject to the development regulations in Section 37.5 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480. Please note the following sections from Southlake Ordinance 880 -A moving forward with platting and permitting of this project: Sec. 9.5 -298. Subdivision of property burdened by pipeline. When one or more residential lots in a proposed subdivision are crossed or come by or come within 100 feet of any existing oil or gas pipeline or pipeline easement, the subdivider shall, prior to and as a condition of city approval of the subdivision, execute the following waiver and hold harmless agreement, which shall be duly acknowledged in the manner provided by law, and which shall thereafter be recorded in the appropriate deed or other permanent county records: "[Subdivider Name], by and through its duly undersigned and authorized officer, does hereby state that it fully realizes that it is applying for a permit from the City of Southlake to build within 100 feet of an existing oil or gas pipeline or pipeline easement, and that the City of Southlake considers building near such pipeline or pipeline easement to have certain inherent dangers, including but not limited to explosion and release of noxious, toxic and flammable substances. For the aforementioned reasons [Subdivider Name] hereby RELEASES and agrees to forever HOLD HARMLESS the City of Southlake, Texas, its officers, officials, employees, successors and assigns from all liability in any way arising from the building, use or habitation of [structure described in the said permit]." Sec. 9.5 -299. Waiver /hold harmless agreement required for issuance of building permit. (a) Any person, firm or corporation wishing to obtain a building permit for the erection, construction, reconstruction or expansion of any structure, of which any portion of such erection, construction, reconstruction or expansion would occur within 100 feet of an existing oil or gas pipeline or pipeline easement shall, prior to and as a condition of the issuance of such building permit, execute the following waiver and hold harmless agreement, which shall be duly acknowledged in the manner provided by law and which shall thereafter be notarized and recorded in the appropriate deed or other permanent county records: "I, [Applicant's Name], do hereby state, on my oath, that I fully realize I am applying for a permit from the City of Southlake to build within 100 feet of an existing oil or gas pipeline easement; that I am fully aware of the dangers inherent in building near such pipeline or easement, including but not Case No. Attachment E ZA10 -069 Page 1 limited to explosion and release of noxious, toxic and flammable substances; and, further, that I do hereby RELEASE and agree to forever HOLD HARMLESS the City of Southlake, Texas, its officers, officials, employees, successors and assigns from all liability in any way arising from the building, use or habitation of the structure described in the said permit." (b) Prior to beginning any excavation, trenching or digging using powered equipment or hand tools that may damage a pipeline, any person within the city shall be required to contact the one call system and any other appropriate underground utility coordinating systems and determine if there are any pipelines or public utilities in the vicinity of the proposed activities. (c) If physical contact is made with a pipeline during any excavation, trenching or digging, the pipeline operator must be notified by the person or agency making the physical contact with the pipeline for any necessary pipeline inspection or repair. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment E ZA10 -069 Page 2 Surrounding Property Owners Southlake Town Square Garden District Residences / Revised Concept Plan 7 8 9 1 172 1 2 7 72 170 178 51 52 53 7 73 58 66 67 32 4 6 5 5 49 CO 6 6 � 7 69 8 33 g 162 6 3 8 30 164 163 29 40 38 27 3 169 173 26 36 � 167 25 24 23 46 34 35 174 1 5 22 1 L19 47 41 45 11 74 166 8 21 44 7g 79 10 20 48 2 43 77 76 75 81 82 165 176 15 17 18 3 6 14 13 11 16 12 4 Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 1 69 168 1 137 138 139 134 140 133 141 132 37 169 142 143 131 167 144 130 145 129 146 147 28 1 148 35 127 p 149 150 126 a, v n ` 151 125 99 m °' N v 152 124 153 123 122 110 109 .'- �m� 74 107 106 166 105 136 104 103 78 79 102 81 82 101 Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 1 • • # 1. Owner Southlake, City Of Zoning SP1 Land Use Town Center Acreage 3.73 Response NR 2. Gateway Church NRPUD Public /Semi - Public 82.01 NR 3. Cambridge 114 Inc SP2 Office Commercial 3.06 NR 4. Cambridge 114 Inc SP2 Office Commercial 5.08 NR 5. Cambridge 114 Inc SP2 Office Commercial, Medium Density Residential 4.29 NR 6. 1575 E Southlake Llc SP1 Office Commercial 1.44 F 7. Greenway - Carroll Road Prtnrs C3 Town Center 7.09 NR 8. Greenway - Carroll Road Prtnrs C3 Town Center 1.12 NR 9. Slts Land Lp DT Town Center 0.92 NR 10. Greenway - Southlake Office Prtn SP1 Office Commercial 1.99 NR 11. Miron, Gary A& Janice L C2 Office Commercial 0.54 NR 12. Malik, Nalia & Shezad B1 Office Commercial 0.63 NR 13. Jonanna Development Llc SP1 Office Commercial 1.10 NR 14. Bruton, Paul R & Doreen SP2 Office Commercial 1.02 NR 15. Carroll /1709 Ltd SP2 Town Center 8.67 NR 16. Carroll /1709 Ltd SP2 Town Center 7.38 NR 17. Southlake, City Of SP2 Town Center 0.78 NR 18. Carroll /1709 Ltd SP2 Town Center 8.93 NR 19. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.42 F 20. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.38 F 21. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 4.33 F 22. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.34 F 23. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.67 F 24. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.28 F 25. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.58 F 26. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 4.08 F 27. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.75 F 28. Slts Grand Avenue II Lp DT Town Center 0.48 NR 29. Slts Grand Avenue II Lp DT Town Center 1.42 NR 30. Slts Grand Avenue II Lp DT Town Center 0.56 NR 31. Slts Grand Avenue II Lp DT Town Center 0.40 NR 32. Slts Grand Avenue II Lp DT Town Center 1.86 NR 33. Southlake, City Of DT Town Center 1.97 NR 34. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.67 F 35. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.48 F 36. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 2.44 NR 37. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.58 NR 38. Southlake, City Of DT Town Center 1.37 NR 39. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.43 NR 40. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.60 NR 41. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.39 F 42. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.38 F 43. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.27 F 44. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 3.62 F 45. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 0.33 F 46. Southlake, City Of DT Town Center 0.69 NR 47. Southlake, City Of DT Town Center 0.81 NR Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 2 • 48. Owner Southlake, City Of Zoning DT Land Use Town Center Acreage 0.94 Respo NR 49. Town Square Ventures Lp SP1 Town Center 2.66 F 50. United States Postal Service SP1 Town Center 2.97 NR 51. Southlake, City Of DT Town Center 1.72 NR 52. Southlake, City Of DT Town Center 1.70 NR 53. H & C Southlake Hilton Llc DT Town Center 3.72 NR 54. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.26 NR 55. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.22 NR 56. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.19 NR 57. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.24 NR 58. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.40 NR 59. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.23 NR 60. Southlake, City Of DT Town Center 0.34 NR 61. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.25 NR 62. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.01 NR 63. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.01 NR 64. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.01 NR 65. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.01 NR 66. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.75 NR 67. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.51 NR 68. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.22 NR 69. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 2.96 NR 70. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.20 NR 71. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.42 NR 72. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 2.90 NR 73. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 2.55 NR 74. Southlake, City Of DT Town Center 2.07 NR 75. Town Square Ventures Iv Lp DT Town Center 0.47 F 76. Town Square Ventures Iv Lp DT Town Center 0.92 F 77. Town Square Ventures Iv Lp DT Town Center 0.28 F 78. Slts Block 22 Lp DT Town Center 0.40 NR 79. Town Square Ventures Iv Lp DT Town Center 1.66 F 80. Southlake, City Of DT Town Center 0.09 NR 81. Town Square Ventures V Lp DT Town Center 1.10 F 82. Town Square Ventures Lp DT Town Center 2.27 F 83. Early, Fidelma DT Town Center 0.07 NR 84. Farhat, Ashley S DT Town Center 0.06 NR 85. Colvin, John F Etux Brenda R DT Town Center 0.06 U 86. Mills, Michael D Etux Rita DT Town Center 0.06 NR 87. Wang, Tzuchung S & Julia Huang DT Town Center 0.06 NR 88. Lewis, Terry W Etux Debra K DT Town Center 0.06 O 89. Pekowski, Raymond J Etux Linda DT Town Center 0.06 NR 90. Hale, Genevieve Etvir John DT Town Center 0.06 F 91. Kienast, Joseph P Etux Deanna DT Town Center 0.06 F 92. Nelson, Kenneth R & Sharon DT Town Center 0.06 NR 93. Posey, James H DT Town Center 0.06 NR 94. Schirle, Joseph L Jr DT Town Center 0.06 NR 95. Vance, Frederick Etux Carol DT Town Center 0.06 NR 96. Talkington, Timothy J DT Town Center 0.06 NR Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 3 • 97. -1111,11 7 R & K Lehmann Investments Zoning DT Land Use Town Center Acreage 0.06 Response NR 98. Julia, Thomas Etux Mary Jane DT Town Center 0.06 O 99. Durant, Tom & Susan Durant DT Town Center 0.13 NR 100. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.16 NR 101. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.07 NR 102. Muns, Ludmilla DT Town Center 0.04 NR 103. Pote, C Edwina DT Town Center 0.04 U 104. Torres, Carlos DT Town Center 0.04 NR 105. Zagar Revocable Trust DT Town Center 0.06 O 106. Visosky, Mark DT Town Center 0.07 NR 107. Winfrey, Jayne A DT Town Center 0.07 NR 108. Chu, Edward DT Town Center 0.07 NR 109. Ryne, Wallace R DT Town Center 0.08 U 110. Francis, Tim D Etux Pamela D DT Town Center 0.09 NR 111. Faulkner, Sandra Potter DT Town Center 0.09 NR 112. Angeluna Properties Llc DT Town Center 0.08 NR 113. Smith, Pete DT Town Center 0.08 NR 114. Fout, April R Etvir George D DT Town Center 0.08 F 115. Osorio, Federico G Etux Paula DT Town Center 0.08 F 116. Martin, John Etux Patricia D DT Town Center 0.08 NR 117. Shetterly, Mark Etux Kathern DT Town Center 0.08 NR 118. Stebbins, Brian R DT Town Center 0.07 NR 119. Teeuws, John DT Town Center 0.07 U 120. Biersmith, Mark A & Sally A DT Town Center 0.07 O 121. Jones, Brent M Etux Dana DT Town Center 0.08 NR 122. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.12 NR 123. Arnold, William Etux Joanna DT Town Center 0.08 NR 124. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 125. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 126. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 127. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.05 NR 128. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 129. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 130. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 131. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 132. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 133. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 134. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 135. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.65 NR 136. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.13 NR 137. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.09 NR 138. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.08 NR 139. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.07 NR 140. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.08 NR 141. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 142. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 143. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 144. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 145. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 4 JEUM 146. 'Owner Brownstone At Town Square Lp Zoning DT Land Use Town Center Acreage 0.06 Respo NR 147. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 148. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 149. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 150. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.06 NR 151. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.08 NR 152. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.08 NR 153. Pennington, Brent & Harriet P DT Town Center 0.10 NR 154. Fields, Jennifer A DT Town Center 0.06 NR 155. Squires, Jonathan Etux Amy DT Town Center 0.06 NR 156. Coons, Robert & Kathy DT Town Center 0.06 NR 157. Alexander, Stanley Etux Lisa DT Town Center 0.06 NR 158. Ahern, Timothy & Leonor Ahern DT Town Center 0.08 NR 159. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.13 NR 160. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.10 NR 161. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 0.12 NR 162. Kile, Cindie SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.47 NR 163. Schlitz, Carl Etux Adrianne SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.57 NR 164. Dowdy, Robert Wesley SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.66 NR 165. 7330 Fair Oaks Blvd Prt Etal C3 Town Center 2.36 F 166. Goldfish (De) Lp C3 Town Center 4.66 NR 167. Hd Development Propertiex, Lp C3 Town Center 11.60 NR 168. Slts Land Lp DT Town Center 5.35 NR 169. Brownstone At Town Square Lp DT Town Center 4.31 NR 170. Chesapeake Land Dev Co Llc AG Mixed Use 3.09 NR 171. Slts Grand Avenue Lp DT Town Center 0.27 NR 172. Slts Land Lp DT Town Center 13.48 NR 173. Mendez Ltd AG Medium Density Residential 2.91 NR 174. Strunck, Juergen F Etux Gisela AG Office Commercial, Medium Density Residential 3.27 NR 175. Strunck, Juergen F Etux Gisela DT Office Commercial, Medium Density Residential 0.31 NR 176. Prade, C A Jr Etux Anita Est AG Office Commercial, Medium Density Residential 15.42 NR 177. H D Development Properties Lp C3 Town Center 0.20 NR 178. Chesapeake Land Dev Co Llc AG Mixed Use 8.08 NR 179. Chesapeake Land Dev Co Llc AG Mixed Use 1.11 NR 180. Shamrock Pipeline Corp, The C3 Town Center 0.41 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided Notices Sent: One - Hundred Eighty (180) Responses Received: Seventeen (17) - Attached In Favor - Nine (9) Opposed - Four (4) Undecided - Four (4) NR: No Response 1) Hale, Genevieve Etvir John, 1520 Main Street, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form in Favor of this item on February 23, 2011. Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 5 2) 1575 E. Southlake Llc (Terry L. Wilkinson), 640 W. Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form in Favor of this item on February 24, 2011. 3) Fout, April R. Etvir George D., 1577 Main Street, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form in Favor of this item on February 24, 2011. 4) Kienast, Joseph P. Etux Deanna, 1518 Main Street, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form in Favor of this item on February 24, 2011. 5) ZagarRevocable Trust, 169 SummitAvenue, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form in Opposition of this item on February 24, 2011. 6) Colvin, John F. Etux Brenda R., 1530 Main Street, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form in Undecided About of this item on February 25, 2011. 7) Pote, C. Edwina, 165 Summit Avenue, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form in Undecided About of this item on February 25, 2011. 8) Town Square Ventures Lp (Michelle M. Theisen), P.O. Box 9273, Oak Brook, IL; Submitted a notification response form in Favor of this item on February 25, 2011. 9) Town Square Ventures IV Lp (Karla Chase), P.O. Box 9273, Oak Brook, IL; Submitted a notification response form in Favor of this item on February 25, 2011. 10) Town Square Ventures Lp (Timothy Moorehead), P.O. Box 9273, Oak Brook, IL; Submitted a notification response form in Favor of this item on February 25, 2011. 11) Lewis, Terry W. Etux Debra K., 1524 Main Street, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form and letter in Opposition of this item on February 26, 2011. 12) Julia, Thomas Etux Mary Jane, 1504 Main Street, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form in Opposition of this item on February 28, 2011. 13) Teeuws, John, 1587 Main Street, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form in Undecided About of this item on February 28, 2011. 14) Osorio, Federico G. Etux Paula, 1579 Main Street, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form in Favor of this item on March 2, 2011. 15) Biersmith, Mark A. & Sally A., 1589 Main Street, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form and letter in Opposition of this item on March 3, 2011. Submitted a letter of Opposition of this item on March 11, 2011. 16) Ryne, Wallace R., 177 Summit Avenue, Southlake, TX; Submitted a notification response form in Undecided About of this item on March 3, 2011. 17) 7330 Fair Oaks Blvd Prt, 550 Howe Avenue, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA; Submitted a notification response form in Favor of this item on March 7, 2011. Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 6 02/23/2011 10 00 FAX ZA10•068 & ZA10. Hale, Genevieve Etvlr John 1520 Main St Southlake Tx, 76092 39618B 21 21 Notification Response Form it 001 /001 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL,, FAX,0R..HANQ-DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position:. IAJ - :�a 0 U 1 LWAI Signature: Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): _ 1.2 Must be property owner(.) whose narne(s) are Phone Number (optional): Date: a3 X01( Date: C- 0Vti Jte VE /'I . J /.-c printed at top, Otherwise contilict the Planning Department. One form per property. t fro -6 Mill llrarZ:1~7 ment F Page 7 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 1575 E Southlake Llc 640 W Southlake Blvd Southlake Tx, 76092 15805 1 2AR Direct questions and mail responses to: City of Southlake Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 Southlake, TX 760 , Phone: (817)748-80 , Fax. (817)748 -81777 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby =tn -.-) opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Printed Name(s): I.e Must be property owner(s) whose name Phone Number (optional): C./r l z ! (" sC) at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. r�eTi [�a�Z:Z:7 of Attacnment F Page 8 Additional Signature: Date: Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Fout, April R Etvir George D 1577 Main St Southlake Tx, 76092 39618B 24 14 Direct' questions and mail responses to: City of Southlake Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: {817 )748 -8621 Fax: (817)748 -8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: ( i Si'anature: Additional Sidnature: Date: / r Date: Printed Name(s):'��1 Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the lanning Department- One form per property - Phone Number (optional): r�ils1011- :1 ment F Page 9 ReN �%ation Response Form v. ZA10 -068 8r ZA10 -069 7 Kienast, Joseph P Etux Deanna 1518 Main St Southlake Tx, 76092 39618B 21 22 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY B THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Fir, I Signature: j"' 0:5 Additional Signature: D00- K I, + Date: 4 �,_7/1/ Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): r�e` [iaiZ:1~7 nment F Page 10 W ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Notifi�c4on Response Form Zagar Revocable Trust 169 Summit Ave Southlake Tx, 76092 396188 24 5 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: -,r /e15nV FX/Z 5 — 70 RAJeGub6 Mtle?V S %& S[`c� c�TZ�at4� h- cg-e(6575, 1,4'517V- C77—", 4eX � 7` G/Ni LSG� �t^ AJ117 ( ��L ,j OX EX iS7 2EW-57 5C0tdrT�o�p - Signature: Additional kQ naj Printed Name(s): A Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at Vb A&lo Date: vmerwise contact the manning Department. One form per property. q —71 rAT' s10111-:1 >�nt F Page 11 Phone Number (optional): Rece1Ved [Original Comments:] ptcnning Dept The plan fails to include much - needed surface parking. No unit owner needs less than two permanent spaces. Most need three spaces - a third space for the high school / college student at home. Surface spaces are needed if the parking garages for the project provide only two spaces per unit. Surface parking is critical (even more than for resident over -flow) for delivery trucks, service vehicles, guests, visitors, etc. In my opinion, there needs to be one surface space per unit. Also, do not consider Central Avenue or existing East Garage as solutions. Central Ave. parking is already occupied and no one would choose the East Garage. Summit and Main streets will be clogged with cars and trucks unable to park. KEITH C. ZAGAR 169 SUMMIT AVE. 02 /20/2011 rAe`liffil l Attacnment F Page 12 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Colvin, John F Etux Brenda R 165 Summit Av 1 5 A is tc 6 Southlake Tx, 76092 396186 21 16 Direct questions and mail responses to: City of Southlake Planning $ Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817)748 -8621 Fax: (817)748 -8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature r Date L5' d o// Additional Signature: Date: a ,15,.R // Printed Name(s): s,&Cj4do C01111'4-�V jo La1 U"r} Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): `� /?, 79'9227d, 27d, ase ivo. ZA10 -069 Attacnment F Page 13 Vicinity Map Southlake Town Square s. Area of "DT" Downtown Zoning District Amendment (ZA10 -068) " Area of Revised Concept Plan for "The Garden District at Southlake Town Square" (ZA10 -069) W F 0 500 1,000 2,000 s Feet Lase Ivo. ZA10 -069 Httacnment F Page 14 Notification Response Form to: ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 City of Southlake Planning & Development Services Notification Response Pote, C Edwina 1400 Main St; Ste 310 165 Summit Ave Southlake, TX 76092 Southlake Tx, 76092 Phone: (817)748 -8621 39618B 24 3 Fax: (817)748 -8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to a is ded t (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Si nature: - g �� ©7� Date: Additional Signature 1� Date: Printed Name(s): C' I :Edk i a Ay /2. Most be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Caste o—. Httacnment F ZA10 -069 Page 15 Space for comments regarding your position: 02/25/2011 13:35 8173100773 SOUTHLAKE TOWNSGUARE PAGE 01/01 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 8r ZAIO.089 Town Square Ventures LP PO Box 9273 Oak Brook 11, 60522 39618 10 1 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX QFL HAND DEL WERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC !-FEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby Ih favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): AJ, Ae, t f � v - M — h; seJ Must be property owner(s) whose names) are printed at top. Otherwise oontad the Planning Department. One forth per property. Phone Number (optional): T UAf Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 16 02/25/2011 13:37 8173100773 S©UTHLAKE TOWNSQUARE PAGE 01/01 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Town Square Ventures Iv Lp 2901 Butterfield Rd Oak Brook II, 60523 39618 22 2 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in flavor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space fore comments regarding your position* Signature: Printed Name(s): Must be properly owners} whose names) are printed at top. Otherwise contact She Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional); Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 17 Additional Signature: Date: 02/25/2011 13:38 8173100773 SOUTHLAKE TOWNSQUARE PAGE 01/01 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 S ZA70 -069 Town Square Ventures V Lp 2901. Butterfield Rd Oak Brook 11, 60523 39618 23 1 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC BEARING. -- Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor f apposed to undecided about (circle or underline ones. the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: - 1 Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 18 Feb 26 2011 10:54RM HP LRSERJET 3200 817 -468 -3667 P.1 Notification Response F� m ZA10 -868 & ZAIO-069 Lewis, Terry W Etux Debra K 1524 Main .St Soutl Tx, 76092 396186 21 19 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted a ove, are hereby in favor of =oPposedundecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 1 Signature: Additional Signature: Printed Narne(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Ptann Phone Number (optional): 7 0 - S 14 G - -9 Case No. ZA10 -069 Date: _ 24 .A Date: One form per Attachment F Page 19 Feb 26 2011 10:54RM HP LRSERJET 3200 817- 488 -3687 Terry and Deb Lewis 1524 Main St. Southlake, TX 76092 817-310-6397 As a charter resident of the Brownstone development in Town Square, I am wrt g to express my concerns wittrthe proposed "Garden District" by Cooper and Stebbins. This proposal was pre, In"te d to us at a Brownstone home Owners Association Meeting on January 12, 2011. The concerns I outline below were expressed to Frank Bliies -ol=- Cooper and Stebbins at that meeting, Commitment to Timely and Quality Construction The first wave of Brownstone owners planned the sale of their homes and movir thought was a firm commitment for delivery by Cooper and Stebbins. That date This forced many of us who had sold our homes to live in temporary housing wi months passed the original date. While construction delays are to be expected, t after date was pushed back. We lived in an apartment for a year and a half beta in, the games had just started. We have built over 4 new homes different cities i new homes have punch lists and issues to correct but the quality ofhome we. we delivered. The problems that every homeowner went through here is legendary without question the most poorly engineered and constructed home we have eve Cooper and Stebbins may be outstanding and premier developors of commercial to construction of residential homes, they have a lot to learn. Bait and Switch The original master plan for the Brownstone community was a major selling poh and 2 of what would ultimately be an additional two phases of the same architect would have no doubt have enhanced not only the aesthetics of where we live but our investment. Now after four years of delay and living with a view of amud h not even allow us to pull cars into our garages properly, here comes the "Garden far this development, to me, it looks bike a very upscale apartment complex. Un- story buildings and floor plans that range from 1500• -3000 sf. Not only will they now could very likely turn into rental properties for the owners. This is happenit and hag created many problems with renters who are not s►etiva" -to -take pride, propensity to obey the property Covenants. In my opinion, with the lower price: reduce the value of all of the original Brownstone units. White it maybe better t hole, the long -term implications on home values here are major. This to me is a doing a bait and switch with the current owners. The excuse is that the market h, publicly that the market for the current Brownstone design no longer exists. Did the country truly miss the target market by that much or are they now just playin. units? where does that leave us who bought in good faith? Access and Alley Traffic schedules based on what we vas missed by well over a year. i our furniture in storage for is was beyond the pale when date ;e of this delay. Once we did move .th corporate moves. Again, all promised and paid for was not it least among ourselves). This is owned::' Ike point being, while- iroperties, however, when it comes for us. We were to be in Phase 1 re and floor plan concept. This ]so assured the long -term value of .e and a dilapidated fence that will 4striot'. If you have seen the plan aground parking, three mlr like an apartment complex but i now in the current Brownstones ktheirhomes and have no Tints and smaller units this will _ m looking at a weed - infested mud assic case of Cooper and Stebbins changed and they have said ne ofthe premier developers in off the economics of lower priced The alley that currently runs parallel to Main Street will be amain access point t three of the new buildings. This alley, for all practical purposes, is one lane. Today, if two cars meet, one must pull over into a garage access and let the other car pass. Also while this is posted as a private drive, we have many cars that cut through this alley that are not residents. Now comes the "Garden District' plans that will have three new buildings of 6 -12 units each adding additional traffic to this alley. This appears to be no issue to the developers. Ho ever, it will be a major issue to those ofus who use this alley everyday. Tome there is no excuse for not Great g a buffer zone between these properties and having separate access. Again, this is a major change from what we were committed to when we bought the property. These are just some of the concerns I have about this development. Not the least pf which is the possibility that as they dig underground parking this may result in structural damage to our units. Case No. ZA10 -069 p.2 Attachment F Page 20 Feb 26 2011 10:54RM HP LRSERJET 3200 817 - 488 -3667 P.3 I am fully aware that many here believe that this is batter than nothing, but as yo 1 consider the approval of this Please also consider the commitmen+sthat ooperand Stebbins inadeta the ai Brownstone owners and vVhere this will leave us. My obvious preference would he that they build out the coma unity like -was promised in the.c>rigioal master plan. If this.is "Iternative, my only hope is that•they.are cl to drsevesythengpoysi le t� ensure the value and integrity of the current Brownstones and Town Square. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to express my opinion on this matter. Sincerely, Terry Lewis Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 21 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Julia, Thomas Etux Mary Jane 1504 Main St Southlake Tx, 76092 39618B 21 29 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 1. tlri � lo 1` ! i k� aid - �, �.fi'µ. (,kc. a rl- ►,�,, 2 co" cev we - J 7�r<�.F toe, ,tk�j f'�" Vr.fl4-vv 4 -4 1 -e. 3. Coo --fw+[ w%, tnGr4tl2p� t+"Q C T�'c i •n . 0 4 -fn erffrq n cc_. e..h, �+aC o �✓' y'�,,f i ,err c2 . 5. S�� re-I-vrn .3 -�b 2- b,L-as gam : Thif w;I redv�e -t-e s !� " as �e ✓: red by cl�vefo�e� whi�� Signature: L Date: 2 Additional Signature: Date. 2 -2 - 8 - z° 1 ! 6V 6 Printed Name(s): _T�o a Ac'i - r j JU Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): 817- 5/88 -V5 Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 22 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Teeuws,John 1587 Main St Southlake Tx, 76092 396186 24 19 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to u (c ircle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: V cAb Gek w{QC a&-X &.1, 2.. 9 !vim a r t' L e- j Lre --r-- 4 CA.-* O-60 ,A S Signature: Additional Signa 4�� Date: 2 �� Date: Printed Name(s): CJ Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): - - Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 23 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 8r ZA10 -069 Osorio, Federico G Etux Paula 1579 Main St Southlake Tx, 76092 39618B 24 15 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the er(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby i apposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: 31� 1 Additional Signature: Date Printed Name (s): ,: F� ICO 0�6M — T>AJ L., 4, o►zs l Dz Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional) Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 24 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Biersmith, Mark A & Sally A �e \�� 1589 Main St �� `�®1� Southlake Tx, 76092 , p :> ,� 396188 24 20 �� ®� po V� 9iil PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: W tt9r � 6PkI�z4 r-oA( 6u r - c� � I"W Signature: Date: 3, 3, l I Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Oth rwise contact the Planning Department. One form p r property. Phone Number (optional): ``��r Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 25 From: Mark Biersmith To: Daniel Cortez Subject: Next Phase - Brownstones /Flat Date: Friday, March 11, 2011 12:33:11 PM Daniel, You requested my views on the proposed next development phase of the Brownstones/Flat project. First, I brought the last new Brownstone. I paid approximately $179 square foot. The developer is suggesting a selling price for the new flats at $250 a square foot or a 40% increase over the price I paid in February, 2010. Reason would dictate the developer is unlikely to acheive this price point in a depressed market. The property would likely not appraise. Thus, dilution seems likely. Second, multiple dwelling units ( "MDU "s) are commonly thought to dilute the values in a neighborhood. The Flats certainly would qualify as a MDU and thus, if tradition holds, likely dilute the Brownstone values. Third, the developer in his presentation shows the interior of the Ritz units in downtown Dallas as units to mock the Flats' interiors. It is encouraged that the Southlake City Attorney review all the litigation filed by Ritz depositors or unit owners. It will be fruitful as an independent valuation of a MDU project in a down economy. This author also suggests a review of the HOUSE and other MDU development projects as part of the evaluation of this proj ect. Fourth, the developer spoke of not building the units until the proposed units have deposits on them. A similar situation occurred at the Ritz. What happened was an environment supporting dilution. If the developer gets 20% down at the time the unit is reserved and the depositor subsequently defaults, the builder need only recover 80% to get full value. Thus, if the unit was originally sold at time of original deposit at $250 a square foot, the developer need only recover 80% of the $250 or $200 to obtain full value. Such a technique can cause subsequent sales to only be appraised at $200 thereby causing dilution. In this example, the author based on past Brownstone sales believes the original depositor may have to default simply because the Flat property will not appraise at much above his cost of $179. At this historical cost, the purchaser will have to come up with a much higher down payment or forgoe the deposit. Fifth, throughout Dallas, MDUs were discounted up to 30% in attempt to sell the units during this current economic downturn. Sixth, failing to sell the units, caused many developers to rent the unsold units in Dallas e.g. Palamor. Seventh, the survey being used to determine customer demand in this case was developed and taken by the real estate firm likely to sell the units. At the very least, an independent firm should develop and be in charge of the survey. Eighth, the developer is saying the most likely buyer for the Flats is a current homeowner in Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 26 Southlake. If true, this homeowner is going to have difficulty selling their current abode and thus may likely default on the purchase of the unit. Such a default would cause a loss of deposit. As you may be aware, a recent Brownstone purchaser recently faced this very issue. Ninth, it is likely the economy not the type of unit causing a slowdown in the Brownstone sale. To change to a MDU format is likely a failed attempt to impact the economic cycle by changing product types. Research may show this attempt elsewhere in Dallas has failed. The developer likely needs to wait until the economy turns to optimize her investment. Thus, realistically, to move forward with the build out of the MDUs in the Town Square increases the likelihood that dilution may occur to the current Brownstone homeowners. Thus, this author as a Brownstone homeowner requests the project to be turned down. Thank you. Mark Biersmith Brownstones at Town Square 1589 Main Southlake, TX 76092 cell: 214.929.3141 begin the_skype_highlighting 214.929.3141 end of the_skype highlighting Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 27 Mar 03 09:06a Wallace Ryne O.D. 817 527-0262 P.1 Notification Response Form PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVE=R =-= PUBLIC HEARING_ - - ---------- -. -rtyso noted above.. [e. }�ereby in favor of opposed to ( � �decjded about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: NO U 1-1 Signature: - Additional Sianatura 1L.. a +L ve .rested Name(s): —li— Lieu rialli-lu —pauineiji, UfjL1TC3ffn per prop—":. !optional): q Case No. Attachment F ZA1 0-069 Page 28 Mar 03 11 09:05a Wallace Ryne O,D. 817 527 -0262 p.2 •_.�,� e� - tom , r� ..� - - -- - - -- - II - a?: _ - a Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 29 MAR, 7.2011 4:22PM RAY STONE INCORP NO.8343 Notification °ra AR. n 6 'W A A A A&A 7330 Fair Oaks Blvd 650 90we Aqc-) *Zoo Sacroa rune i CA M! =ACC - wvnnr(R! nr The- pmp - _ = - - --- - - - - - - - 'I Ul tU01 III IV LFI IU v! AAffifinnol. qlrinnfi irP' Date: U V f r j r-% - --------- - ------ - � r propg lor-"ACA 4 N 00 & 504A*k(Xke FWA. Case No. Attachment F ZA1 0-069 Page 30 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Teeuws,John 1587 Main St Southlake Tx, 76092 396186 24 19 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to u (c ircle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: V cAb Gek w{QC a&-X &.1, 2.. 9 !vim a r t' L e- j Lre --r-- 4 CA.-* O-60 ,A S Signature: Additional Signa 4�� Date: 2 �� Date: Printed Name(s): CJ Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): - - Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 1 02/23/2011 10 00 FAX ZA10•068 & ZA10. Hale, Genevieve Etvlr John 1520 Main St Southlake Tx, 76092 39618B 21 21 rA60VJAI IAJ - 3WA/ - �Q CYA4 00 iT it 001 /001 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL,, FAX,0R..HANQ-DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position:. LWAI Z& Signature: Notification Response Form Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(.) whose narne(s) are Phone Number (optional): Date: a3 X01( Date: C- 0Vti J ,IE /YI . J /.-c printed at top, Otherwise contilict the Planning Department. One form per property. t fro -6 Mill llrarZ:1~7 mentF Page 2 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 1575 E Southlake Lie 640 W Southlake Blvd Southlake Tx, 76092 15805 1 2AR Direct questions and mail responses to: City of Southlake Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817)748 -8621 F ..... (817)748 -8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of ) opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: ,o//' Printed Name(s): _ Must be property owner(s) whose Phone Number (optional): �( *iSOa at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. r�S[1a111 -VI Attacnment F Page 3 Additional Signature: Date: Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Fout, April R Etvir George D 1577 Main St Southlake Tx, 76092 39618B 24 14 City of Southlake Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817)748-8621 Fax: (817)748 -8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: c i Si'dnature: Additional Sidnature: Date: / rl Date: Printed Name(s):�� l� Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Other contact the lanning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): r�i :1 ment F Page 4 oe�tion Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 � 6 \ 0 0 Kienast, Joseph P Etux Deanna 1518 Main St Southlake Tx, 76092 39618B 21 22 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Additional Signature: D00- Date: /�/ Date: � �q Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): , /,7 rW_Ti [iaiZ:tN7 ment F Page 5 hi ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Zagar Revocable Trust 169 Summit Ave Southlake Tx, 76092 396186 24 5 Notifi c4on Response Form 9.0 *y �� PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby t in favor of (opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: nd ,. l z-t�57s 7- �/ f1 =7- . 77�,!�- s t & e 4W z 3 IL) Signature: j 15 �� 0t611 b 4/o Date: Additional S � '� ,''�'�' Date: P Printed Name Must be property owner(s) whose names) are printed at Phone Number (optional): Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Cf _. �"- /V r�eTi [�a�Z:Z:7 mentF Page 6 received [Original Comments:] �Qnning Dept The plan fails to include much - needed surface parking. No unit owner needs less than two permanent spaces. Most need three spaces - a third space for the high school / college student at home. Surface spaces are needed if the parking garages for the project provide only two spaces per unit. Surface parking is critical (even more than for resident over -flow) for delivery trucks, service vehicles, guests, visitors, etc. In my opinion, there needs to be one surface space per unit. Also, do not consider Central Avenue or existing East Garage as solutions. Central Ave. parking is already occupied and no one would choose the East Garage. Summit and Main streets will be clogged with cars and trucks unable to park. KEITH C. ZAGAR 169 SUMMIT AVE. 02/20/2011 r1fils liffillml Attacnment F Page 7 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Colvin, John F Etux Brenda R 465 Summit.A -_ �� Southlake Tx, 76092 39618B 21 16 bireat questions and mad responses to: City of Southlake Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817)748 -8621 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided aboutut � (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: l Signature -_ ra&4"I'D r Date: JA'07 011 Additional Signature: ' g _�'�� L�a� Date: � � l g •� Ol/ Printed Name(s): ,(j (6h11'hw- SAy) col ol Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): ' 1 ?1 79g_ A270, rAT' s10111-:1 ment F Page 8 Vicinity Map Southlake Town Square ■ Area of "DT" Downtown Zoning District Amendment (ZA10 -068) N Area of Revised Concept Plan for "The Garden District at Southlake Town Square" JZA10 -069) W F 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Case 1vo. ZA10 -069 Httacnment F Page 9 Notification Response Form to: ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 City of Southlake Planning & Development Services Notification Response Pote, C Edwina 1400 Main St; Ste 310 165 Summit Ave Southlake, TX 76092 Southlake Tx, 76092 Phone: (817)748 -8621 39618B 24 3 Fax: (817)748 -8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to a is ded t (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Si nature: - g �� ©7� Date: Additional Signature 1� Date: Printed Name(s): C' I :Edk i a Ay /2. Most be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Caste o—. Httacnment F ZA10 -069 Page 10 Space for comments regarding your position: 02/25/2011 13:37 8173100773 S©UTHLAKE TOWNSQUARE PAGE 01/01 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Town Square Ventures Iv Lp 2901 Butterfield Rd Oak Brook II, 60523 39618 22 2 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in flavor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space fore comments regarding your position* Signature: Printed Name(s): Must be properly owners} whose names) are printed at top. Otherwise contact She Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional); Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 11 Additional Signature: Date: 02/25/2011 13:35 8173100773 SOUTHLAKE TOWNSGUARE PAGE 01/01 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 8r ZAIO.089 Town Square Ventures LP PO Box 9273 Oak Brook 11, 60522 39618 10 1 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX QFL HAND DEL WERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC !-FEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby Ih favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): AJ, Ae, t f � v - M — h; seJ Must be property owner(s) whose names) are printed at top. Otherwise oontad the Planning Department. One forth per property. Phone Number (optional): T UAf Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 12 02/25/2011 13:38 8173100773 SOUTHLAKE TOWNSQUARE PAGE 01/01 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 S ZA70 -069 Town Square Ventures V Lp 2901. Butterfield Rd Oak Brook 11, 60523 39618 23 1 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC BEARING. -- Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor f apposed to undecided about (circle or underline ones. the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: - 1 Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 13 Feb 26 2011 10:54RM HP LRSERJET 3200 817- 488 -3687 Terry and Deb Lewis 1524 Main St. Southlake, TX 76092 817-310-6397 As a charter resident of the Brownstone development in Town Square, I am wrt g to express my concerns wittrthe proposed "Garden District" by Cooper and Stebbins. This proposal was pre, In"te d to us at a Brownstone home Owners Association Meeting on January 12, 2011. The concerns I outline below were expressed to Frank Bliies -ol=- Cooper and Stebbins at that meeting, Commitment to Timely and Quality Construction The first wave of Brownstone owners planned the sale of their homes and movir thought was a firm commitment for delivery by Cooper and Stebbins. That date This forced many of us who had sold our homes to live in temporary housing wi months passed the original date. While construction delays are to be expected, t after date was pushed back. We lived in an apartment for a year and a half beta in, the games had just started. We have built over 4 new homes different cities i new homes have punch lists and issues to correct but the quality ofhome we. we delivered. The problems that every homeowner went through here is legendary without question the most poorly engineered and constructed home we have eve Cooper and Stebbins may be outstanding and premier developors of commercial to construction of residential homes, they have a lot to learn. Bait and Switch The original master plan for the Brownstone community was a major selling poh and 2 of what would ultimately be an additional two phases of the same architect would have no doubt have enhanced not only the aesthetics of where we live but our investment. Now after four years of delay and living with a view of amud h not even allow us to pull cars into our garages properly, here comes the "Garden far this development, to me, it looks bike a very upscale apartment complex. Un- story buildings and floor plans that range from 1500• -3000 sf. Not only will they now could very likely turn into rental properties for the owners. This is happenit and hag created many problems with renters who are not s►etiva" -to -take pride, propensity to obey the property Covenants. In my opinion, with the lower price: reduce the value of all of the original Brownstone units. White it maybe better t hole, the long -term implications on home values here are major. This to me is a doing a bait and switch with the current owners. The excuse is that the market h, publicly that the market for the current Brownstone design no longer exists. Did the country truly miss the target market by that much or are they now just playin. units? where does that leave us who bought in good faith? Access and Alley Traffic schedules based on what we vas missed by well over a year. i our furniture in storage for is was beyond the pale when date ;e of this delay. Once we did move .th corporate moves. Again, all promised and paid for was not it least among ourselves). This is owned::' Ike point being, while- iroperties, however, when it comes for us. We were to be in Phase 1 re and floor plan concept. This ]so assured the long -term value of .e and a dilapidated fence that will 4striot'. If you have seen the plan aground parking, three mlr like an apartment complex but i now in the current Brownstones ktheirhomes and have no Tints and smaller units this will _ m looking at a weed - infested mud assic case of Cooper and Stebbins changed and they have said ne ofthe premier developers in off the economics of lower priced The alley that currently runs parallel to Main Street will be amain access point t three of the new buildings. This alley, for all practical purposes, is one lane. Today, if two cars meet, one must pull over into a garage access and let the other car pass. Also while this is posted as a private drive, we have many cars that cut through this alley that are not residents. Now comes the "Garden District' plans that will have three new buildings of 6 -12 units each adding additional traffic to this alley. This appears to be no issue to the developers. Ho ever, it will be a major issue to those ofus who use this alley everyday. Tome there is no excuse for not Great g a buffer zone between these properties and having separate access. Again, this is a major change from what we were committed to when we bought the property. These are just some of the concerns I have about this development. Not the least pf which is the possibility that as they dig underground parking this may result in structural damage to our units. Case No. ZA10 -069 p.2 Attachment F Page 14 Feb 26 2011 10:54RM HP LRSERJET 3200 817 - 488 -3667 P.3 I am fully aware that many here believe that this is batter than nothing, but as yo 1 consider the approval of this Please also consider the commitmen+sthat ooperand Stebbins inadeta the ai Brownstone owners and vVhere this will leave us. My obvious preference would he that they build out the coma unity like -was promised in the.c>rigioal master plan. If this.is "Iternative, my only hope is that•they.are cl to drsevesythengpoysi le t� ensure the value and integrity of the current Brownstones and Town Square. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to express my opinion on this matter. Sincerely, Terry Lewis Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 15 Feb 26 2011 10:54RM HP LRSERJET 3200 817 -468 -3667 P.1 Notification Response F� m ZA10 -868 & ZAIO-069 Lewis, Terry W Etux Debra K 1524 Main .St Soutl Tx, 76092 396186 21 19 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted a ove, are hereby in favor of =oPposedundecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 1 Signature: Additional Signature: Printed Narne(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Ptann Phone Number (optional): 7 0 - S 14 G - -9 Case No. ZA10 -069 Date: _ 24 .A Date: One form per Attachment F Page 16 Notification Response Form ZA10 -068 & ZA10 -069 Julia, Thomas Etux Mary Jane 1504 Main St Southlake Tx, 76092 39618B 21 29 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 1. tlri � lo 1` ! i k� aid - �, �.fi'µ. (,kc. a rl- ►,�,, 2 co" cev we - J 7�r<�.F toe, ,tk�j f'�" Vr.fl4-vv 4 -4 1 -e. 3. Coo --fw+[ w%, tnGr4tl2p� t+"Q C T�'c i •n . 0 4 -fn erffrq n cc_. e..h, �+aC o �✓' y'�,,f i ,err c2 . 5. S�� re-I-vrn .3 -�b 2- b,L-as gam : Thif w;I redv�e -t-e s !� " as �e ✓: red by cl�vefo�e� whi�� Signature: L Date: 2 Additional Signature: Date. 2 -2 - 8 - z° 1 ! 6V 6 Printed Name(s): _T�o a Ac'i - r j JU Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): 817- 5/88 -V5 Case No. Attachment F ZA10 -069 Page 17