Item 7FCity of Southlake
Department of Planning
S T A F F R E P O R T
August 27, 2003
ZA03-061
CASE NO:
Bob Jones Park
PROJECT:
REQUEST: The City of Southlake is requesting approval of a revised site plan for improvements
to the existing game fields to include structures and fixtures not presented in the
previously approved site plan.
1. Conduct public hearing
ACTION NEEDED:
2. Consider revised site plan approval
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
(D) Site Plan Review Summary
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(G) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481-2073)
Bruce Payne (481-2036)
Case No.
ZA03-061
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/APPLICANT: The City of Southlake
PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to permit construction of improvements
proposed for the existing softball and soccer game fields to include batting
cages, a concession/restroom facility, a shade pavilion, bleacher shade
structures, shade canopies and lighting for the softball fields.
PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of North
White Chapel Blvd. and Bob Jones Road.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 1, 2, 10 and 11, M. Mahaffey Survey, Abstract No. 916; Tracts 3, 4, 5
and 5A, R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1003; Tracts 2 and 3, H. Throop
Survey, Abstract No. 1273; and all of the vacated West Beach Addition,
altogether being approximately 200 acres.
LAND USE CATEGORY: Public Parks/Open Space
CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District
HISTORY: -A site plan and preliminary plat for Bob Jones Park was approved by City
Council on August 15, 2000.
P&Z ACTION: August 21, 2003; Approved (7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No.
1, dated August 15, 2003, allowing requested variances and stipulating the
lighting to be turned off at 10:30 p.m. on week days and 11:30 p.m. on
weekends.
STAFF COMMENTS: The following improvements are being presented for approval:
Concession stand / restroom facility: This structure will be located
between the 2 large softball fields and the 4 smaller softball fields. It is
similar to the existing concession / restroom facility adjacent to the soccer
fields.
Shade structures:
A large shade structure is proposed over the playground located at
o
the center of the 4 smaller softball fields.
Shade structures are proposed over all the bleachers for all six
o
softball fields.
Three shade structures for use at the existing soccer fields.
o
Batting cages: Four batting cages, similar to those found at Bicentennial
Park, will be located between the 4 smaller softball fields.
perimeter fencing of the fields and scoreboards
Ball field lighting
Case No. Attachment A
ZA03-061Page 1
Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated August 15, 2003. The
review is limited to only changes proposed under this application. This site is
subject to all requirements and conditions of the original Site Plan approval
unless specifically approved otherwise. The following variances are requested:
Articulation - Due to residential adjacency, the proposed concession
stand/restroom is required to be articulated both horizontally and
vertically on all four elevations (Sec. 43.13.d). A variance may be granted
to this requirement as set forth in Section 43.13.k.
Lighting - The proposed Sport lighting for the ball fields does not comply
with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693-B in the following areas:
Type of lighting (high pressure sodium required, metal halide is
o
being proposed)
Intensity of Light (maximum 20 foot-candles permitted, maximum
o
65 foot-candles proposed)
N:\Community Development\WP-FILES\MEMO\2003cases\03-061RSP.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA03-061Page 2
Case No. Attachment B
ZA03-061Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 2
APPROVED MASTER SITE PLAN
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 3
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 4
SOCCER FIELD EXHIBIT FOR PROPOSED SHADE STRUCTURES
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 5
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 6
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 7
Proposed Bleacher Shade Structure
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 8
Proposed Soccer Field Shade Structure
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 9
Proposed Batting Cages
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 10
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 11
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 12
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 13
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 14
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 15
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 16
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 17
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 18
Case No. Attachment C
ZA03-061Page 19
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA03-061One08/15/03
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Site Plan
Project Name: – Bob Jones Park
APPLICANT: City of Southlake ARCHITECT:
Parks Department
Phone: Phone:
Fax: Fax:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 08/14/03 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT (817) 481-2086.
1.Provide articulation, both horizontally and vertically, on all four elevations (Residential Adjacency -
(A variance has been requested.)
Sec. 43.13.d).
2. Site must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693-B. The proposed ballfield lights do not
comply with the following:
a. Type of lighting (high pressure sodium required, metal halide is being proposed).
(A variance has been requested.)
b. Intensity of Light (maximum 20 foot-candles permitted, maximum 65 foot-candles proposed).
(A variance has been requested.)
Case No. Attachment D
ZA03-061Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners
ZA03-061
Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage
1.MCI Tele-Communications 1.CS 1.Public / Semi-Public 1.1.35
2.A. Oien 2.AG 2.Low Density Residential 2.0.53
3.A. Oien 3.AG 3.Low Density Residential 3.37.79
4.R. Galvin 4.SF-1A 4.Low Density Residential 4.33.17
5.Southlake – Solana Ltd 5.SF-1A 5.Low Density Residential 5.38.26
6.J. Boyles 6.SF-1A 6.Low Density Residential 6.5.40
7.J. Evans 7.AG 7.Low Density Residential 7.5.56
8.M. Grisby 8.AG 8.Low Density Residential 8.1.35
9.M. Grisby 9.RE 9.Low Density Residential 9.10.45
10.G. Persinger 10.SF-1A 10.Low Density Residential 10.1.60
11.E. Hurst 11.SF-1A 11.Low Density Residential 11.1.52
12.C. Smith 12.SF-1A 12.Low Density Residential 12.1.41
13.J. Moore 13.SF-1A 13.Low Density Residential 13.1.50
Case No. Attachment E
ZA03-061Page 1
14.D. Osley 14.SF-1A 14.Low Density Residential 14.1.40
15.D. Osley 15.SF-1A 15.Low Density Residential 15.1.51
16.S. Brackett 16.AG 16.Low Density Residential 16.6.08
17.T. Gable 17.AG 17.Low Density Residential 17.6.00
18.T. Gable 18.AG 18.Low Density Residential 18.2.50
19.M. Lamon 19.AG 19.Low Density Residential 19.1.30
20.M. Lamon 20.AG 20.Low Density Residential 20.2.20
21.M. Lamon 21.RE 21.Low Density Residential 21.7.00
22.P. Landesberg 22.SF-1A 22.Low Density Residential 22.5.77
23.D. Moore 23.SF-1A 23.Low Density Residential 23.4.83
24.J. Doty 24.SF-1A 24.Low Density Residential 24.1.00
25.J. Sibilisky 25.SF-1A 25.Low Density Residential 25.1.00
26.B. Emerson 26.SF-1A 26.Low Density Residential 26.1.00
27.O. Jansen 27.SF-1A 27.Low Density Residential 27.1.03
28.D. Gurczewski 28.SF-1A 28.Low Density Residential 28.1.10
29.Askew & Askew, Inc. 29.SF-1A 29.Low Density Residential 29.1.04
30.R. Tierney 30.SF-1A 30.Low Density Residential 30.1.00
31.L. Smith 31.SF-1A 31.Low Density Residential 31.1.12
32.VLMC, Inc. 32.SF-1A 32.Low Density Residential 32.1.02
33.C. Walker 33.SF-1A 33.Low Density Residential 33.1.05
34.J. Miller 34.SF-1A 34.Low Density Residential 34.1.05
35.J. Clark 35.SF-1A 35.Low Density Residential 35.1.08
36.H. Howell 36.SF-1A 36.Low Density Residential 36.1.19
37.C. Reese 37.SF-1A 37.Low Density Residential 37.1.13
38.USA 38. 38. 38.
39.R. Spencer 39.SF-1A 39.Low Density Residential 39.1.03
40.T. Clark 40.SF-1A 40.Low Density Residential 40.1.00
41.B. Monts 41.SF-1A 41.Low Density Residential 41.1.04
42.R. Jenner 42.SF-1A 42.Low Density Residential 42.2.03
43.B. Dollar 43.SF-1A 43.Low Density Residential 43.1.11
44.A. Barrett 44.SF-1A 44.Low Density Residential 44.1.25
45.R. Hogan 45.SF-1A 45.Low Density Residential 45.1.50
46.R. Rice 46.SF-1A 46.Low Density Residential 46.1.03
47.A. Brooks 47.SF-1A 47.Low Density Residential 47.1.00
48.M. Nolan 48.AG 48.Low Density Residential 48.1.00
49.A. Willoughby 49.AG 49.Low Density Residential 49.1.00
50.T. Edwards 50.AG 50.Low Density Residential 50.1.00
51.R. Hughes 51.AG 51.Low Density Residential 51.1.07
52.M. Cummins 52.AG 52.Low Density Residential 52.1.00
53.M. Cummins 53.AG 53.Low Density Residential 53.0.70
54.C. Fretwell 54.AG 54.Low Density Residential 54.1.48
55.C. Fretwell 55.AG 55.Low Density Residential 55.0.69
56.C. Fretwell 56.AG 56.Low Density Residential 56.4.38
57.M. Miles 57.AG 57.Low Density Residential 57.11.2
58.USA 58. 58. 58.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA03-061Page 2
Surrounding Property Owner Response
ZA03-061
Notices Sent: Fifty-Eight (58)
Responses: One (1)
Richard Anderson, 4553 N. White Chapel, Roanoke, TX is opposed to lighting and
excessive costs. (see attached letter received August 20, 2003)
Case No. Attachment F
ZA03-061Page 1
Case No. Attachment F
ZA 03-061 Page 2