Item 6B13 SOUTHLAI<,,E
CITY OF
Department of Planning & Development Services
'�a drill 0 =:7No 1•] :aI
February 9, 2011
CASE NO: ZA11 -001
PROJECT: Toys "R" Us / Babies "R" Us
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Casco Corp. is requesting approval of a Revised Site Plan to modify the east
building fagade for Toy "R" Us/ Babies "'R" Us who is proposing to occupy the
former Circuit City space located near the southwest corner of State Highway 114
and N. Kimball Avenue at 250 N. Kimball Avenue. SPIN #8
DETAILS: Casco Corp. is requesting a revised site plan approval to modify the east building
fagade for Toys "R" Us / Babies "R" Us who is proposing to occupy the former
Circuit City tenant space. The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the front entry
of the building which will include installation of additional store front aluminum
framed glass panels, new roof cornice material and removal of a portion of the
cultured stone wainscot. The vertical wall surrounding the main entry door and
glass panels will be reconstructed at an approximate 7 degree angle extending
away from the main building wall. Additionally, the plans show a portion the cornice
and parapet wall along the north fagade being removed.
Variances
A variance is being requested to the Masonry Ordinance No. 557 -A, as amended,
under Section 1, Exterior Masonry Construction Requirements. The Masonry
Ordinance requires for the applicant to have at least eighty percent (80 %) of all
exterior walls, excluding doors, constructed of masonry materials or glass. When
the site plan for Southlake Corners was originally approved, the Corridor Overlay
and Masonry regulations allowed up to 80% of a building fagade (excluding doors
and windows) to consist of synthetic masonry material such as EIFS/ synthetic
stucco. The regulations for both the Corridor Overlay and the Masonry Ordinance
have since been revised and will allow only up to 20% of a fagade to consist of
synthetic masonry products or other non - masonry materials. Because the applicant
is proposing to increase the percentage of synthetic stucco and non - masonry
surface area (excluding doors and windows) from what is currently in place, a
variance to the Masonry Ordinance is needed.
Due to the limited scope of the request, no site plan review summary was created
for this proposal. However, with the proposed modification of the parapets and
cornice along the east and north facades, the applicant must maintain the
screening of the mechanical units from Southlake Boulevard and SH 114.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct Public Hearing
2) Consider Revised Site Plan Approval Request
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
Case No.
ZA11 -001
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(F) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748 -8067
Daniel Cortez (817) 748 -8070
Case No.
ZA11 -001
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Inland W Southlake Corners, Ltd
APPLICANT: Casco Corp., Patrick Moore
PROPERTY SITUATION: 250 N. Kimball Ave.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2A, Block 1, Farrar Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Regional Retail
CURRENT ZONING: "C -3" General Commercial Zoning District
HISTORY: - The C -3 Zoning was designated on the property with the approval of the
Zoning Ordinance No. 480 on September 19, 1989.
- A preliminary plat was approved by City Council on September 7, 1993
under Planning Case ZA93 -060.
- A revised preliminary plat was approved on May 31, 1994 under Planning
Case ZA94 -029.
- A final plat was approved for Lot 2, Block 1, Farrar Addition on May 19,
1994 under Planning Case ZA94 -043.
- A Site Plan for Southlake Corners was approved by City Council on April
15, 2003 under Planning Case ZA03 -011.
- A Revised Site Plan was approved by City Council on September 1, 2004
to permit a bank and to create the building pad site for Building `H' under
Planning Case ZA04 -056.
WATER & SEWER: Water & Sewer currently serve this site.
TREE PRESERVATION: No trees will be affected by the proposal.
I Kill 01l0ll0CCIF-1
ZONING COMMISSION: February 3, 2011; Motion to approve subject to the mechanical equipment
being screened as noted per the staff report and the Zoning Ordinance, the
applicant provide a color scheme for the white to be a shade which is not
stark, a line of sight analysis and a rendering or exhibit showing the entire
elevation of the building be provided by the City Council meeting. Motion
failed to receive second.
New motion made to deny passed (3 -2); Commissioner Lancor and Vice
Chairman Hudson dissented.
STAFF COMMENTS: Due to the limited scope of the request, no site plan review summary was
created for this proposal. However, with the proposed modification of the
parapets and cornice along the east and north facades, the applicant must
maintain the screening of the mechanical units from Southlake Boulevard
and SH 114.
N.ICommunity DevelopmentlMEMO12011 Cases1001 - SP - Toys R Us - Babies R UslStaff Report
Case No. Attachment A
ZA11 -001 Page 1
Vicinity Map
Toys "R" Us / Babies "R" Us
STATE HIGHWAY 114
2
3
r
r
�L
m
E SOUTHLAKE BLVD (FM 1709)
ZA11 -001
...,
,
�.
Revised Site Plan
Masonry Ordinance Variance
250 N. Kimball Ave.
N
0 300 600 1,200
Feet
S
Case No. Attachment B
ZA11 -001 Page 1
D�
j N
j (D
o z
00
j
a1
n
S
2) (
(a 3
(D '*
L L �1 PC; � 3e �_ r •,
— Y
VM.INNY MAP 4
Lu mmn.wex.aeu .••� _ Imo' z ul
W i
w s2 j
Z
\' SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART = O O
-. _- T - f
i,n Draw O Ll
� >I
W c
hx
�l
,�1 h
V VV
h hh
l h
8M PLAN 4ft
-'.
EXISTING SUMMARY CHART
SUMNMY CHMT- BUFFFRYA OS
Iy �
CCNCF.PfU PARIUHG I6LAWS
SffE ffJ N FOR WALMART REDEVELOPMENT
RECD MICR 12 21 m --
Z
2 w
Oz *
4�
O �
0,
U
z r !! +x
Uls
f� c r
SP -3U
Li
N
s �
s �
i Cl)
L �
�O
t �
� O
0
J rh
J
O�
s 0
N 0
>
(D
6 z
0
A .
as
0
=r
(D
rr
...........
rN� �r� ` ., ,` � i■�■■ =� u = r'�'�""it "_ .� 0111111111
roe/ : � i� - . • . - � ����.. - . - a Dumlm
VIII: w
,am
to
_ - -- ' � ° 7111111111
I . hlllllllll
D �! " 'E
- � _ JIIIIIIIII
0 ° 7111111111
-!�� OBY OTWJW
F.F.E 51407
ANCHOR 'C'
25,000 SF w
All
Rk
70
ro 0
N 0
>
(D
6 z
0
0
9 6 ) ( D
(a m
(D l*
EIF9 M1 t 5W
0 5 p4r —,
EIF5 &k% 5W
mx pnz - N4.
me[CF Center
j y 1 s,
,q , u
,,
F115 - P 5.
0OIXF—IN4,
AWOa.w I
Ip.
J
Plan
I 1
'/,S.QL 5; GAP't".qu.i.
O Proosed Rear Elevation
Wcf
DATE: 12121/2010
Added rear elev. I
w 0
Photo - Existing Conditions
D�
j N
j (D
o z
00
j
D
rt
a1
0
S
v m
3
.r
FRONT ELEVATIOtr
� 0
SIDE ELEVATION
MATERIAL LEGEND
Y
Q (�
M". 71,
a —
— — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
—
.. a , a .. m .
REAR ELEVATION
I WPiSQ M P1,7
SRO; MMIACERS
^ �� /1
SOUTHLAKE CORNERS SHOPPING CENTER
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
�Oys
ja
�WZJ�O JG'B NO.: !11!41
-
� 0
Surrounding Property Owners
Toys "R" Us / Babies "R" Us
5
13 3 6
7
9
8
4 1 2 15 14 12 117, 10
SPO #
1.
Owner
Ethan Allen Retail Inc
Zoning
sP1
Land Use
Retail Commercial
Acreage
2.06
Response
NR
2.
Greenway- 1709 /Eleven II Lp
SP1
Retail Commercial
1.75
NR
3.
Inland W Southlake Corners Ltd
C3
Regional Retail
16.71
NR
4.
Gateway Church
CS
Office Commercial
13.66
NR
5.
McDonald's Corp
C3
Regional Retail
1.06
NR
6.
Dn Kingston Southlake Lp
C3
Regional Retail
0.66
F
7.
Dn Kingston Southlake Lp
C3
Regional Retail
1.13
F
8.
Marshall Descendants 2006 Trst
C3
Regional Retail
0.92
NR
9.
Stagliano, Vincent J Etal
C3
Regional Retail
0.39
NR
10.
Church Of Christ Our King
CS
Retail Commercial
2.34
NR
11.
Southlake Plaza 11 Ltd Prtn
B1
Retail Commercial
0.83
NR
12.
Southlake Plaza 11 Ltd Prtn
61
Retail Commercial
0.91
NR
13.
Eqyinvest Owner II Ltd Up
C3
Town Center
13.15
NR
14.
Southlake Plaza 11 Ltd Prtn
61
Retail Commercial, Office
Commercial
8.48
NR
15.
Greenway- 1709 /Eleven Partners
B1
Retail Commercial, Office
Commercial
9.39
NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided
Notices Sent: Fifteen (15)
Responses Received: One (1)
Case No.
ZA11 -001
NR: No Response
Attachment D
Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Notification Response Form
P.0 cerKe
ZA11 -001
Dn Kingston Southlake Lp
27 Woodcrest
Irvine Ca, 92603
22605 1 2
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby
in favor of opposed to undecided about
(circle or underline one)
the proposed Revised Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
ffj 1� U
�t 6 6s? LL
Signature:
Additional Signature:
Printed Name(s): _
Must be property owner(s) whose
Date:
Date:
1 2 A (�r (? d ti
are printed at top. Otherwise conta t the Planning Department. One form per property.
Phone Number (optional):
Case No. Attachment E
ZA11 -001 Page 1