Loading...
Item 6A (2)Thank you Mr. Mayor, members of the City Council, the following is a request by the Sage Group on behalf of Silver Oak Land Development for a Zoning Change and Development Plan approval request from "AG" and "CS" Zoning Districts to "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development. The proposed development named Highland Park consists of 16 residential lots on approximately 8.9 acres located at 151 & 411 E. Highland Street. 1 Current Zoning is "AG" Agricultural and "CS" Community Service Zoning Districts. 2 Future Land Use Highland Park Existing Land Use: Medium Density Residential Future Land Use LU_TYPE 100-Year Flood Plain Mediuff Density Re itlential Corps of Engineers Property Office Public Park/Open Space Commercial PubliGSemi-Public Low Density Residential ' Medium Density Residential Office Commercial - Retail Commercial - Mixed Use - Town Center - Regional Retail - Industrial Medium Density 0 'a" 3.. 65n Fee[ Residential 10 -Year Floo Plain The future land use designation for the site is medium density residential. This is an aerial with the site outlined in blue showing Summerplace Addition to the east and Chapel Downs addition to the southwest. This is a birds eye view looking south. ¢�maserao�,� Fe ze ly�J Owner / Deeloper: c�m+ii•.�� no3a Zoning Case #ZA10-060 Development & Pedestrian Access Plan HIGHLAND PARK .J W.W. Hall Survey, Abstr,d No. a7, Tr,d 1B2 & SoaNlake—,,bly of Gad Addition, Block 1, L t 1R2-.0,1ake, Tarra�l County, Texas This is the Development Plan submitted by the applicant consisting of 16 lots and 4 open space lots. This plan does reflect the modifications done since 1st reading and have been listed and provided to Council this evening as a separate attachment. 0 This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as it _ pertains to the "SF-20A" Single -Family Residential zoning district and the City of Southlake Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the following exceptions: - Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall not be less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. Front Yard: The minimum front yard of a lot shall not be less than twenty five ' (25) feet. Side Yard: The minimum side yard shall not be less than ten (10) feet. Rear Yard: Each lot shall have a minimum rear yard of twenty five (25) feet. Lot Dimensions: All standard lots shall meet the requirements of the "SF-20A" district. Lots fronting on "eyebrow" ball at street corners (specifically, Lots 8 through 11) shall have a minimum width of 88' and minimum depth of 121'. Lot widths shall be measured at' the Front Yard setback line and depths along the side lot line for each lot as indicated on the Zoning Development Plan. Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding forty percent (40%) of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600 square feet. A minimum 4' wide concrete sidewalk shall be required on both sides of all internal streets, except in the center open space lot. Streets shall have a 40' R-O-W, with 30' of paving, except the four streets surrounding the open space lot, where the streets shall have a minimum 32' R- 0-W with 24' of paving. Development regulations shall follow the "SF-20A" zoning regulations with the exceptions noted in the slide. "SF-20A" regulations call for: Lot Area: 20,000 sq. ft. minimum Front Yard: 35-foot setback Side Yard: 15-foot setback Rear Yard: 40-foot setback, 35-foot on lots fronting a cul-de-sac Lot Dimensions: 100-foot width / 125-foot depth Lot Coverage: 30% 9 Fence Legend 7' Proposed masonry wall 6' Wooden fence to be installed 6' Wooden fence to remain, with facing installed on open portions; or new 6' wooden fence to be installed. Legend 4' Concrete Sidewalk 6' Concrete Sidewalk Common Open Space Residential Lots Stamped Concrete ■ Signature Column E. HIGHL ND SST A -- IS, l9 s.r� - — —.. I5 Is.n2 i% •`� I a I � 15.027 F. I I 3,_ ^ 9t \ IQUI4E1 1 4 o s u e vLFu�'m f 91 ��•u la 15.148,1 � x\\\�w-•rye I V 3I,r,.lx x. f. 16,034 I'll 1+ 1?.1 ' 16.027sC C II� I �iwn4 Ib OIO..f.. ,F.c —11 11 I ��- * Existing boundary fences in dilapidated condition or no fence existing shall be replaced or installed as noted in the fence legend. 9 om --- -- -- _ k. HIGHLAND ST, - —_ __ •_ nreo%aam I I Ij 11 rr Ir.r a— ] `��-- Owner /sDevebper s ex oedoornemm. oec. sxe wmma wrmb.rmxro+ g y oM ,; I ,�, III --__ — Planner. .r i Pm'. v L14 r �\` I _ I I / I Zoning Case #ZA10-060 '� Tree Conservation Plan HIGHLAND PARK \J W.W. Hail Sorvey, Ab t— W. 687, Trac[ 182 & S-!,Wke Assembly of Gotl A idit-, Bock 1, Lo[ IQ Sou[hlake, T—1,a County, Teas Not required to have any tree preservation but the applicant is preserving 53% of the existing 7.6% tree cover on site. 10 11 SAGE GROUP, W. HIGHLAND PARK SOUTHLAAKE TEXAS Park feature with parking inlets for 2 vehicles. 14 vehicle capacity around park. 11 12 H 1p -ALA"-- HIGHLAND PARK 5OUTHLAKE. TEXA5 13 Looking southeast 14 Looking east, southeast 15 Looking south, southeast 16 Looking east along southern boundary 17 Looking south im Looking west along Highland Street. 19 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION • November 18, 2010; Tabled (7-0) at the applicants request to the next Planning & Zoning Commission meeting scheduled on December 9, 2010. December 9, 2010; Approved (4-0) noting the applicant's willingness to add `No Parking' signs on the opposite side of the street from the park as requested by the City's Fire Marshall and subject to Staff's Report dated December 3, 2010. ©CITY OF SOUTHLAKE CITY COUNCIL January 4, 2011; Tabled (7-0) at the applicants request until the next scheduled regular City Council meeting. • January 25, 2011; Approved (7-0) noting the applicant's willingness to construct a fence around the entire development with the rear fence post side of the fence to be facing away from both the adjacent property owners and the new development lots (double -sided fence), also noting the upgraded entry median with short columns and the revised pond rendering presented at this meeting, and subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated November 12, 2010. ©CITY OF SOUTHLAKE c­ Oi SOUTHLAKE 9 Questions? Integrity Innovation Accountability Commitment to Excellence Teamwork 23 24