Loading...
Item 7DCity of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT September 15, 2004 CASE NO: ZA04 -058 PROJECT: Don Davis Investments REQUEST: On behalf of Don Davis Investments, CPAD, Inc. is requesting approval of a site plan. The plan proposes the construction of an office /warehouse building of approximately 6,000 square feet. The following variances are being requested: • Masonry — Masonry shall be provided on all facades of the building in accordance with residential adjacency standards of Ordinance No. 480 Section 43.13 as amended. The applicant is requesting a variance from providing masonry on the side and rear fagades. • Articulation — Horizontal and vertical articulation shall be provided on all fagades. The applicant is requesting a variance for both horizontal and vertical articulation on all facades. • Driveway pacing — The minimum spacing between commercial driveways on a local street is 100 feet. The applicant is proposing a drive approximately 57 feet from the drive to the east. • Buffer ay rds —The "F -1" bufferyard requires a 6 -foot wood fence. The "F -2" bufferyard requires a 6 -foot masonry wall. The Applicant is requesting a variance from the fence and wall requirements along the south boundary. • Screening From Residential Property — An 8 -foot screening device is required when a non- residential use is adjacent to a residential use. The applicant is requesting a variance from the screening requirement along the south boundary. • Screening Of Loading Area — A screening device is required to screen the view of the loading area from adjacent properties with a residential use. The applicant is requesting a variance from the screening requirement. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider site plan approval ATTACHMENTS: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) Background Information Vicinity Map Plans and Support Information Site Plan Review Summary Surrounding Property Owners Map Surrounding Property Owners Responses Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481 -2073) Ken Baker (481 -2046) Case No. ZA04 -058 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Don Davis Investments APPLICANT: CPAD, Inc. PROPERTY SITUATION: 2105 Greenbriar Drive, Southlake, Texas LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4R, Block C, North Davis Business Park LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial CURRENT ZONING: "I -1" Light Industrial District HISTORY: -A preliminary plat and final plat were approved by City Council on February 4, 1986. -City Council approved a plat revision on December 1, 1987. -City Council approved a change of zoning to "I -1" with the adoption of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480 on September 19, 1989. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Case No. ZA04 -058 Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Davis Boulevard to have 130 feet of right -of -way. Existinz Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed site will have one (1) access directly onto Greenbriar Drive. Greenbriar Drive intersects with Davis Boulevard approximately 600 feet to the west of this site. Davis Boulevard is a 5 -lane, undivided thoroughfare with a continuous, two - way, center left -turn lane. Greenbriar Drive is a 2 -lane, local commercial street serving the North Davis Business Park development. May, 2004 traffic counts on Davis Blvd (between W. Southlake Blvd & Continental Blvd 24hr North Bound (NB) (11,781) South Bound (SB) (12,825) NB Peak A.M. (976) 7 — 8 a.m. Peak P.M. (891) 5 — 6 p.m. SB Peak A.M. (817) 8 — 9 a.m. Peak P.M. (1,318) 5 — 6 p.m. Attachment A Page 1 Traffic Iniptic PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN: WATER & SEWER: TREE PRESERVATION Use Sq. Ft. Vtpd* AM- IN AM- OUT PM- IN PM- OUT Office warehouse 6,000 42 5 1 1 5 *Vehicle Trips Per Day * *The AM /PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on Davis Boulevard. The Southlake Pathways Master Plan does not recommend any trail or sidewalk improvements on or adjacent to this property. An 8 -inch water line exists along the south side of Greenbriar Drive. A 6 -inch sanitary sewer line stub exists on the west property line. A Tree Survey was submitted with the proposed Site Plan. All existing trees are shown to be preserved. P &Z ACTION: September 9, 2004; Approved (6 -0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated September 3, 2004. Granting the variance for driveway spacing; all required screening shall be met by installation of a 6 foot minimum height evergreen plant screen such as photinias or wax myrtles; specifically denying the variance requests in masonry and articulation requirements. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated September 3, 2004. N: \Coimuunity Development \WP - FILES \MEMO \2004cases \04- 058SP.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA04 -058 Page 2 Vicinity Map Don Davis Investments R S Case No. ZA04 -058 E Attachment B Page 1 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet m va "U MARY CHART OUFFERYARE)S gCtYJrr fl OMER INFORMATION FOR LANII)StAPCCALCULAT)DNS PROPOSED, SITE 2105 GREENRPUAR DR. SUMMARY CHART INTCRIOR LANDSCAPING OL u cr t +91R year C d sscwwe `, 0 or Jr.. ROAN PREPARA— =1Z r sr l N IATA� (Dw A OMER INFORMATION FOR LANII)StAPCCALCULAT)DNS PROPOSED, SITE 2105 GREENRPUAR DR. or Jr.. ROAN PREPARA— =1Z r sr l N IATA� (Dw A I ,. VICINITY UkP ti I MEAN a n Ju RFC's AUG 2 3 nu CASE NO: ZA04-058 k �- n F I ,. VICINITY UkP ti I MEAN a n Ju RFC's AUG 2 3 nu CASE NO: ZA04-058 k �- n OL u I ,. VICINITY UkP ti I MEAN a n Ju RFC's AUG 2 3 nu CASE NO: ZA04-058 k �- n A � O G i b � PR!••�IM'aYfS MI!iµ FI�IMwiO IdT+I•L 1114 , H . Fl EF#41b w MPL "MR AW voraaenctna YFM.RL ■tlIST�M eYii r>Ca1.'IH? LK#R9 -T P m - wx — 1 }M*l C- L TPG'Jlai JGNx} w 2 x 4 u6 � — I!}Td4.PPDl4,4C rtlx>whewdlp6 I'I¢rwlexeu ny�l2 C iid. PNa+� �n�txa"L � IRIGK F•GIa fY+1Pq HuFaG4'S rRPJ�G'E h6WE 9LEN610E FIPGhi $IPUGIII� $62411776+8 GI fNYERIdR l+�tls7t+1 kR.4wvp,� P FMT{N}M � INC ICG2 ,rn.ue is a +uncles L} w.x sr,l.r >91v1eeo wTO ma Eil .i1lµ4 }'•a MBIWeL�C 14r+4 i i W PK'S l+ & PK>RTN Mb '�M1U iz+ p fig ; IuLL C1!'! 'C!4 o Ixi>� IIGl�BQBR w cn 7r�Pe rteaw l r ,? ri IaiN. ar V "mo. o m i rr iva a++u. ISC 61 i MCTre]TdL�lYrpw � I I I I I + j� I wixawrlrrolwlaevrs +�FAG•6FMxe�KFTKPV 19faL9lF 411Fa � - 1 a r ✓0{]IJ7 L M eLlx/dTrpAa IIaKCEW monnmµvl� •. w�rr�n ��caaw•i. �� reeEx� mss•.,: 4•m w O ° i Z V3 YixIOFL IIL•r5Y1tIP7 RNA 1L Lil it Y E ,' I•JPIx+Al2! . rnenra u im rll@W9lD Klux4 IR}�!1'aL �TICIWL pCfy1S . L[iiP✓W'CY.IAYIVdH ff� AAV lII/I'C ° "� PItlE°INa9Fim 17n. IedaT lLl5Y6TIdJ °°° "ip T11 ""z aTml xo LJfJ� , Ik"W}ILV" L3 DLO �I J Piliii „+ I AXS W I^cYSa4v IITnI R'EC[} AUG 2 3 2104 + + awl {'� ►il�at�.tr.�v�rsor� „ 4f A2-1 N n I I h ! ' ra i i i 1, I 'mil ; � ca l r ,? ri o m i rr k ,aa P f I r i i i e Pw I S I II I 3/i I EI 4 C3 Y ICS IIII CSI LI1 Ixl iy -- j ra r �re�.iep 2�cx]k o,s••� e�� I r}iCld •P i anls•Tllwarwm. I { I M • p�P11Ni i �urM I1ICIa1 A ox * IIT 'Iii i plw�yY,rla ;Itra cs � i f ' 9' Y �'.� �'W ifJ IA %� O ° i Z V3 YixIOFL IIL•r5Y1tIP7 RNA 1L Lil it Y E ,' I•JPIx+Al2! . rnenra u im rll@W9lD Klux4 IR}�!1'aL �TICIWL pCfy1S . L[iiP✓W'CY.IAYIVdH ff� AAV lII/I'C ° "� PItlE°INa9Fim 17n. IedaT lLl5Y6TIdJ °°° "ip T11 ""z aTml xo LJfJ� , Ik"W}ILV" L3 DLO �I J Piliii „+ I AXS W I^cYSa4v IITnI R'EC[} AUG 2 3 2104 + + awl {'� ►il�at�.tr.�v�rsor� „ 4f A2-1 N n ARCHFMCMHE are V k��� i CONCEPTS August 23, 2004 CPAD, INC. City of 5outhiake 1400 Main Street Southlake, Texas 76092 Attn: Ben Bryner Re: Case Na.ZA -04 -058, 2105 Greenbriar Drive_ Mr. Bryner. With regards to the site plan recently submitted for DRC review and approval I request relief or a variance from the following portions of the Zoning Ordinance. In the following paragraphs each portion of the ordinance is identified and is briefly discussed regarding why relief is being requested and should be granted by the City Council. 1. Ordinance 557 and Ordinance 480, Section 43.13.a.7. Residential Adjacency Standards These sections require the use of masonry on all sides of a new building, when the new building is closer than 400 feet to a residential property. The owner requests relief for the following reasons: A. The proposed site is located within an existing business park which is zoned i - B. The residential site (Zoned SF -30) which is south of and adjacent to the proposed site is located within the area designated on the Land Use Plan as Office Commercial. C. The proposed new building is being placed as far away from the residential property as possible. It is approximately 156 feet from the property line to the nearest portion of the proposed new building. 2. Ordinance 480, Section 43.13.a.4. Residential Adjacency Standards These sections require the vertical and horizontal articulation of all sides of a new building, when the new building is closer than 400 feet to a residential property. The owner requests relief for the following reasons: A. The proposed site is located within an existing business park which is zoned 1 -1 B. The residential site (Zoned SF -30) which Is south of and adjacent to the proposed site is located within the area designated on the Land Use Plan as Office Commercial. It is believed that the future land use of this property will change. C. The proposed new building is being placed as far away from the residential property as possible. It is approximately 156 feet from the property line to the nearest portion of the proposed new building. 3. Ordinance 480, Section 39.4.b. Screening, Non Residential Districts This section requires screening at the property line, when a non - residential use is adjacent to a lot with residential zoning. For a type F -2 bufferyard, the ordinance requires a G' high masonry wall. The owner requests relief from the requirements identified above, for the following reasons: A, The residential site (Zoned 5F -310) which is .adjacent to the proposed site is located within the area designated on the Land Use Plan as Office /Commercial. It is believed that the future Land use of this property will change. B. The proposed new building is being placed as far away from the residential property as possible. It is approximately 156 feetfrom the property line to the nearest portion of the proposed new building_ Case No. Attachment C ZA04 -058 Page 3 4. Ordinance 480, Section 42.4.f. This section requires screening at bufferyards which are Type F1 & F2. The locations of these are indicated on the site plan_ The owner requests relief from the requirements identified above (at all Type 1 and Type 2 bufferyards), for the following reasons A. The residential site (Zoned SF -3D) which is adjacent to the proposed site is located within the area designated on the Land Use Plan as Office /Commercial. It is believed that the future land use of this property will change. B. The proposed new building is being placed as far away from the residential property as possible. It is approximately 156 feet from the property line to the nearest portion of the proposed new building. 5. Ordinance 480, Section 39.4.e. Screening, Non Residential Districts This section requires screening of off street loading areas, when a non - residential use is adjacent to a lot with residential zoning. The owner request relief for the following reasons: A. The residential site (Zoned SF -30) which is adjacent to the proposed site is located within the area designated on the Land Use Plan as Office /Commercial. It is believed that the future land use of this property will change. B. The proposed loading areas are being placed as far away from the residential property as possible. It is approximately 156 feet from the property line to the nearest portion of the proposed new building_ C. The loading zones are orientated in a manner that will present the smallest area to the residential area. D. In addition, the required bufferyards will partially screen these loading areas. 6. Ordinance 634, Driveway Spacing, Non Residential District This section requires that driveways be spaced a minimum of 100 feet on a local street_ The owner requests relief for the fallowing reasons- A. The entire frontage on Greenbriar Drive is less than 100 feet in length. B. The existing approach to the east makes it impossible to comply with this provision. C. The street is a low use street, used primarily for industrial purposes. Since ly, Ro iert Lee Case No. ZA04 -0_58 Attachment C Page 4 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA04 -058 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 09/03/04 Project Name: Site Plan — Don Davis Investments OWNER: Don Davis Investments Wavne Winters 2366 E. Road To Six Flags Arlington, TX 76012 Phone: (817) 695 -0078 Fax: (817) 633 -6388 ARCHITECT: CPAD, Inc. Robert Lee 1809 Longbranch Ct Arlington, TX 76012 Phone: (817) 680 -8245 Fax: (817) 795 -5799 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 08/23/04 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ORNEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481 -2073 ORBENBRYNERAT (817) 481- 2086. The following changes are needed with regard to the building and architectural elevations: a) Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480, Section 43.13.a. l is required on all fagades of the proposed buildings. (A variance has been requested.) b) Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.13.a.4 on all fagades for buildings within 400' of a property zoned or designated residential. (A variance has been requested.) 2. Provide the minimum driveway spacing. Spacing between commercial driveways is required to be 100' on local streets. (A variance has been requested.) 3. Provide the required fence and wall in the "F -1" and "F -2" bufferyards. (A variance has been requested.) 4. The following changes are needed regarding screening: a) Provide an 8' screen, as required by Ord. 480, Section 39, along the south property line. An 8' screen is required adjacent to properties zoned for a single-family residential use or properties with an existing single-family residential use. (A variance has been requested.) b) Show and label the screening device required to screen the view of the loading area from the adjacent residential dwelling to the south. (A variance has been requested.) Case No. Attachment D ZA04 -058 Page 1 INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS * No automobile repair /service is allowed in the "I -1" Light Industrial District. Automobile repair /service, body shops, brake shops, glass shops, oil & lube shops, muffler shops, seat cover and upholstery shops, transmission shops, etc. are all permitted in the `B -2" Commercial Manufacturing District only. * The proposed site does not exceed the maximum permitted impervious coverage area percentage of 80% for the "I -1" Zoning District. The impervious coverage area percentage of this site appears to be approximately 42 %. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Case No. Attachment D ZA04 -058 Page 2 Surrounding Property Owners Don Davis Investments Owner Zoning Land Use 1. Hughes, Edward Jr. I -1 Industrial 2. Mayer, Roseann Dinsmoor Stoltz I -1 Industrial 3. Davis Industrial Partners Inc. S -P -1 Industrial 4. Kidwill, Curtis S -P -1 Industrial 5. Davis, Wayne I -1 Industrial 6. Slj/ Cornerstone Ltd. I -1 Industrial 7. D Fontana Holdings Lp. I -1 Industrial 8. Kane, Linda Louise S -P -1 Office Commercial 9. Overby, Larry & Denise SF -30 Office Commercial 10. Harlan, Kathy AG Office Commercial 11. Mirage Carwash Ltd C -3 Industrial 12. Van Horne, Richard & Marlene I -1 Industrial Case No. ZA04 -058 0.590 0.596 0.786 0.793 1.089 1.261 3.059 3.000 0.944 2.700 2.000 0.884 Attachment E Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Don Davis Investments Notices Sent: Fifteen (15) Responses: None (0) Case No. ZA04 -058 Attachment F Page 1