The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 7FCity of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT February 11, 2004 CASE NO ZA03 -088 PROJECT: Chapel Hill Office Park REQUEST: Realty Capitol Corporation is requesting approval of a site plan. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider site plan approval ATTACHMENTS: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) Background Information Vicinity Map Plans and Support Information Site Plan Review Summary Surrounding Property Owners Map Surrounding Property Owners Responses Full Size Plans (Ibr Connin and Council Menzbersv Only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (481 -2073) Bruce Payne (481 -2036) Case No. ZA03 -088 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: RCP Southlake Blvd. 41 Ltd. APPLICANT: Realty Capitol Corporation PURPOSE: The purpose of this request is to receive approval of a site plan and building elevations in order to begin construction of 4 office buildings. PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located at 205 E. Southlake Blvd., approximately 800' east of the intersection of Southlake Blvd. and White Chapel. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LAND USE CATEGORY CURRENT ZONING: HISTORY: TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Case No. ZA03 -088 Tract 5F, OW Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899 Office Commercial "S -P -2" General Site Plan District -A zoning change with a concept plan was approved by City Council on September 2, 2003. Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Boulevard to have 130' of right -of -way. Adequate right -of -way exists for this road. Existinz Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed site will have one (1) access directly onto E. Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). The plan shows common access drives to both the West and the East giving the site access to S. White Chapel Boulevard and the future Parkwood Drive. E. Southlake Boulevard is a 5 -lane, undivided thoroughfare with a continuous, two -way, center left -turn lane. The roadway will ultimately be widened to a 7 -lane roadway. May, 2003 traffic counts on E. Southlake Blvd (between White Chapel Blvd and Byron Nelson Pkw 24hr West Bound (WB) (23,940) East Bound (EB) (22,576) WB Peak A.M. (1,182) 11 — 12 a.m. Peak P.M. (2,938) 5 — 6 p.m. EB Peak A.M. (2,158) 7 — 8 a.m. Peak P.M. (1,465) 4 — 5 p.m. Attachment A Page 1 Traffic Imptict PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN: Use Sq. Ft. Vtpd* AM- IN AM- OUT PM- IN PM_ OUT Office 21,200 233 29 4 5 26 *Vehicle Trips Per Day "The AM /PM times represent the potential number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on Southlake Boulevard. According to the Master Pathways Plan, an 8' multi -use trail is programmed along the south side of E. Southlake Blvd. The trail has been constructed and currently exists. WATER & SEWER: A 12" water line extension is proposed from the east side of the future Parkwood Drive approximately 350' away. An 8" sewer line extension is proposed from the west side of Parkwood Drive approximately 250' away. TREE PRESERVATION: The only trees shown to be preserved on the site is a 40" Oak tree in the southeast corner and 5 Oak trees in the northwest corner of the development. A retention wall is proposed to be constructed around the 40" Oak tree in the southeast corner of the property to contain the existing grade from the proposed grade changes. The constructed retention wall must be built further out from the base of the tree than proposed on the plan. It has to be built to preserve at least 75% of the trees existing Critical Root Zone. P &Z ACTION: February 5, 2004; Approved (4 -0) subject to Site Plan Review No. 3, dated January 30, 2004. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 30, 2004. V,Community Development \WP - FILES \MEMO \2003cases \03- 088SP.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA03 -088 Page 2 Vicinity Map Chapel Hill Office Park Addition 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet E S Case No. ZA03 -088 Attachment B Page 1 ioa'9i0'I:OOd w ° b a� a :Fa � m" z �g� n m , U 8 S o o 00 �Q� m m i •c ' m g� N $p fi�gFU cn U ^' ` Y', �I !la .aa 'w'➢ alop�eo� --- -� eats — � I G � drvn ,Ol - 'JIdl4]Rg_dL �� v — o . d ZL9 !i £L9 ii - aaw t. 0 02191 b #101 J 4 E o ats #lot s /J �a I 3aum� '3'S 001" s 15'`a 11 .• 9#7 I rr a s n,M"." c �m w" i�nwa smnaa®vn ' �j ° :I I �� I _ I. ,�,. �> �' 4 � ',�„ •� x �' :. _ °°°""'� - � a s 35 4Y �w�3d �W ISM nr sv th/0 - ° y - 39m]rW —oiy E n ®. OS'f99-!d A s hs3 i as IP a „ ory~ E'en i Aa ool3' B Q I. 1 4#1ol 17 71 o „w.l �., 3.0 n I s s # log E I 3�ueo Hai nay a n3une .6. b I � as 1 # 101 i' X.]68135 ml„n - -- - �-a J � , � � I I • I . � anamrnR . ai sa a I I I �, � � ue�aw. nu a lrv3.N35N3 urtull V' I DOGS 3G. � �� °' aHVA 83ii119 ,ri, M.�YH135 n n .._ -••�•• � —� _ _ _ `l ° y 3dNJS�ddb'l ,OZ 'JNf(lTN1B I/ aw.u...� I � V i,� anw ir�mrw _.. Irvo » Oa OQiI`6 ~ _ l60[! ��'Ql1� � N oa a. .w `sw .t :wlwros :n w .z 8 S 0 _ _� WHI•ul4�S 3�z '� vn •sr a+rs .xwwws daa J•�w 00 �N o ooi 00 . � I i Q � 03 WEST ELEVATION saic -ai ic-•r,c° (REAR) ^ ,i FRONT - EAST ELEVATION BLDG t la J§�� a r � 7 � nR Q' R-, W va U .°a o i A -4 " 11 �� END • NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS Case No. ZA03 -088 Attachment C Page 3 o M 0. LL o a � n 02 END -NOF?Tl-f&SOUTH --LkVATIONS 0 1 FRONT - EAST ELEVATION I BLDa # z MhAte - Wk�S I )'-Lh VA IILPIV 03 — vll-- I -� Case No. ZA03 -088 Attachment C Page 5 o a ------------ i� 03 REAR - EAST ELEVATION &--r 0 END - NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS 2 11 W mm M. C\ n Case No. ZA03 -088 Attachment C Page 7 o m 02 END- EAST& WEST ELEVATIONS -/,61r-c 0 1.4 A-16 00 n 0 1 FRONT - NORTH ELEVATION BLpa. # 7 03 REAR - SOLrrl4 ELEVATION . .. ................. --- ' r� mi 1 8KIN J li Irmo, 02 END- EAST& WEST ELEVATIONS -/,61r-c 0 1.4 A-16 00 n 0 1 FRONT - NORTH ELEVATION BLpa. # 7 03 REAR - SOLrrl4 ELEVATION U C�, a v Ni 00 o � �N o 0 c 00 . i A� n b � UQ� � o C� y CA .. a v Ni 00 O � Z O y M � O V N SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA03 -088 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 01/30/04 Project Name: Site Plan — Chapel Hill Office Park APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation Steve Isbell 32 Village Lane, Suite 200 Colleyville, TX 76034 Phone: (817) 488 -4200 Fax: (817) 424 -2448 ARCHITECT: Baird, Hampton & Brown, Inc. Konstantine Bakintas 309 W. 7 th St., Suite 500 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Phone: (817) 338 -1277 Fax: (817) 338 -9245 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/20/04 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ORNEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT (817) 481 -2086. General Development Standards Applies Comments Corridor Overlay Regulations Y Complies Residential Adjacency Y Complies Building Articulation Y Complies Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y Complies Interior Landscape Y Complies Driveways Y See Comments No. 1 Lighting Y Must comply with Outdoor Lighting Ordinance No. 693 -B Correctly show the articulation off -sets on the building footprints of the site plan. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS * A copy of the filed Reciprocal Parking and Access Agreement has been provided to the City. * A variance for the driveway location on E. Southlake Blvd was approved with the zoning /concept plan. * A variance for the stacking depth of 4 F was approved for the drive on E. Southlake Blvd with the zoning /concept plan. Case No. Attachment D ZA03 -088 Page 1 The proposed site shall not exceed the maximum permitted impervious coverage area percentage of 65% for the "O -1" Zoning District. The impervious coverage area percentage approved on the concept plan is approximately 60 %. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. A letter of permission from the adjacent property owner(s) on the west must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the off -site pavement and a permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. Please be aware that any change of tenant /owners with a request for a new C.O. will require that all parking areas meet the "all weather surface" requirement in the zoning ordinance and all fire lanes shall be per the Fire Department's requirements. Case No. ZA03 -088 Attachment D Page 2 Articulation Evaluation No. 2 Case No. ZA 03 -088 1 jDate of Evaluation: 01/12/04 Elevations for Chapel Hill Office Park - Building i Received: 12/29/03 Front - facing: East Wall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 21 -42% Yes 36 21 -42% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 3 50% Yes Min. artic. length 5 9 80% Yes 5 9 80% Yes Rear - facing West lWall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 24 -33% Yes 36 24 -33% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 13 550% Yes Min. artic. length 6 6 0% Yes 6 6 0% Yes Right - facing: North lWall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 19 -47% Yes 1 36 21 -42% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 8 300% Yes Min. artic. length 5 9 80% Yes 5 6 20% Yes Left - facing: South Wall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay?j Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 19 -47% Yes 36 21 -42% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 8 300% Yes Min. artic. length 5 9 80% Yes 5 6 20% Yes Case No. ZA03 -088 Attachment D Page 3 Articulation Evaluation No.2 Case No. ZA 03 -088 1 1 Date of Evaluation: 01/30/04 Elevations for Chapel Hill Office Park - Building 2 Received: 01/20/04 Front - facing: East Wall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 23 -36% Yes 36 22 -39% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 3 50 % Yes Min. artic. length 6 9 50% Yes 6 10 67% Yes Rear - facing West lWall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation IVertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 25 -31% Yes 36 29 -19% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 13 550% Yes Min. artic. length 6 7 17% Yes 7 8 14% Yes Right - facing: North lWall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 14 -61% Yes 36 19 -47% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 6 200%1 Yes Min. artic. length 4 9 125% Yes 5 5 0% Yes Left - facing: South lWall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation IVertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 14 -61% Yes 36 19 -47% Yes Min. artic. offset 1 2 21 0% Yes 2 6 200% Yes Min. artic. length 1 4 91 125% Yes 5 5 0% Yes Case No. ZA03 -088 Attachment D Page 4 Articulation Evaluation No. 3 Case No. ZA 03 -088 1 jDate of Evaluation: 01/30/04 Elevations for Chapel Hill Office Park - Building 6 Received: 01/20/04 Front - facing: West Wall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 25 -31% Yes 36 25 -31% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yesi 2 3 50% Yes Min. artic. length 6 9 50% Yes 6 9 50% Yes Rear - facing East lWall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Ivertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 27 -25% Yes 36 27 -25% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 13 550% Yes Min. artic. length 7 7 0% Yes 7 7 0% Yes Right - facing: South lWall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 21 -42% Yes 36 21 -42% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yesi 2 18 800%1 Yes Min. artic. length 5 6 20% Yes 5 6 20% Yes Left - facing: North lWall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay?j Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 21 -42% Yes 36 21 -42% Yes Min. artic. offset 1 2 21 0% Yes 2 18 800% Yes Min. artic. length 1 5 1 61 20% Yes 5 1 6 1 20% Yes Case No. ZA03 -088 Attachment D Page 5 Articulation Evaluation No. 2 Case No. ZA 03 -088 1 jDate of Evaluation: 01/12/04 Elevations for Chapel Hill Office Park - Building 7 Received: 12/29/03 Front - facing: North Wall ht. = 15 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 45 25 -44% Yes 45 26 -42% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 9 350% Yes 2 3 50% Yes Min. artic. length 6 15 150% Yes 6 15 150% Yes Rear - facing South lWall ht. = 15 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 45 16 -64% Yes 45 19 -58%1 Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 2 12 500%1 Yes Min. artic. length 4 9 125% Yes 5 6 20% Yes Right - facing: West lWall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 14 -61% Yes 36 15 -58% Yes Min. artic. offset 2 2 0% Yes 1 2 3 50% Yes Min. artic. length 4 9 125% Yes 4 9 125% Yes Left - facing: East lWall ht. = 12 Horizontal articulation Vertical articulation Required Provided Delta Okay? I Required Provided Delta Okay? Max. wall length 36 14 -61% Yes 36 15 -58% Yes Min. artic. offset 1 2 21 0% Yes 2 3 50% Yes Min. artic. length 4 9 125% Yes 4 9 125% Yes Case No. ZA03 -088 Attachment D Page 6 TREE PRESERVATION ANALYSIS (Non - Residential Development) Case: 03 -088 Date of Review: January 8, 2004 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Chapel Hill Office Park OWNER \ DEVELOPER PREPARED BY: Reality Capital Corporation Baird, Hampton & Brown, Inc. Phone: (817) 488 -4200 Phone: (817) 338 -1277 Fax: Fax: THIS ANALYSIS IS PREPARED AT THE TIME OF REVIEW OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AND IS TO PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN OR SURVEY AND THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ANY PROTECTED TREES ON THE SITE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION CONTACT KEITH MARTIN, LANDSCAPE ADMINISTRATOR AT (817) 481 -5640 TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The only trees shown to be preserved on the site is a 40" Oak tree in the southeast corner and 5 Oak trees in the northwest corner of the development. 2. A retention wall is proposed to be constructed around the 40" Oak tree in the southeast corner of the property to contain the existing grade from the proposed grade changes. The constructed retention wall must be built further out from the base of the tree than proposed on the plan. It has to be built to preserve at least 75% of the trees existing Critical Root Zone. A protected tree shall be considered to be altered if less than 75% of the critical root zone is maintained at undisturbed natural grade, or more than 25% of the canopy is removed, or the tree is disfigured to the extent a reasonable person would conclude the tree will not survive. 3. Non - residential Development: In a non - residential development, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan, shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Case No. Attachment D ZA03 -088 Page 7 Surrounding Property Owners Chapel Hill Office Park Addition D Case No. ZA03 -088 Zoning Owner 1. GCSW, Ltd 2. D. Stoner 3. S. Bryant 4. D. Johnston 5. Fairbanks Capital Corp 6. Bes -Tex Financial Sery 7. White Chapel United 3. Methodist 8. White Chapel United 3. Methodist 9. White Chapel United 4. Methodist 10. S. Garrett Case No. ZA03 -088 Zoning Land Use Acreage 1. 0-1 1. Office Commercial 1. 0.98 2. SF -lA 2. Low Density Residential 2. 1.04 3. SF -lA 3. Low Density Residential 3. 1.00 4. SF -lA 4. Low Density Residential 4. 0.91 5. SF -lA 5. Low Density Residential 5. 0.94 6. S -P -2 6. Low Density Residential 6. 5.91 7. CS 7. Low Density Residential 7. 6.32 8. CS 8. Public /Semi Public 8. 9.50 9. CS 9. Public /Semi Public 9. 0.79 10. AG 10. Low Density Residential 10. 3.69 Attachment E Page 1 FMI 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Chapel Hill Office Park Notices Sent: Nine (9) Responses: None (0) Case No. ZA03 -088 Attachment F Page 1