Loading...
Item 7DCity of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT May 11, 2005 CASE NO ZA04 -090 PROJECT: Specific Use Permit for a Telecommunications Antenna located on Lot 1R, Block 1R, Carroll High School Addition REQUEST: Zone Systems, Inc. is requesting approval of a specific use permit for a telecommunications tower and antenna. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider specific use permit approval ATTACHMENTS: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) Background Information Vicinity Map Plans and Support Information Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 14, 2005 Surrounding Property Owners Map Surrounding Property Owners Responses Resolution No. 05 -008 Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (481 -2036) Dennis Killough (481 -2073) Case No. ZA04 -090 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Carroll Independent School District APPLICANT: Zone Systems, Inc. PROPERTY SITUATION: 1501 W. Southlake Boulevard LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1R, Block 1R, Carroll High School Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Public / Semi Public CURRENT ZONING: "S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District P &Z ACTION: January 20, 2005; Approved to table (5 -0) until February 17, 2005. February 17, 2005; Approved to table (5 -0) until March 17, 2005, noting the applicant has agreed to hold another SPIN meeting. March 17, 2005; Approved to table (5 -0) until April 21, 2005. April 21, 2005; Approved to table (6 -0) until May 5, 2005. May 5, 2005; Approved (7 -0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 14, 2005; specifically noting the applicant's commitment that the flag pole structure type be used and will be light tan in color or least obtrusive. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review No. 2, dated January 14, 2005. An optional flag pole style tower has been included in Attachment C, Page 3. N: \Community Development \MEMO \2004cases \04- 090 SUP. doc Case No. Attachment A ZA04 -090 Page 1 Vicinity Map Specific Use Permit Telecommunications Antenna aW�� Case No. ZA04 -090 Attachment B Page 1 o� 00 0 I P� n Q =' —L ZONED - PUD #3 WATERFORD DRIVE °. t LUD MED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL iEYISTING STONE LAKES PHASE I mW i 1 §1 I 1 � PAI VdfY FENCE L �Gaasr,.•xn "` m esp,l�p -rq pen bx I L IV6[Y ALT 3 U U 5_ 9 mflm.,.as rmPl lu2pw -ss.blr AVFF f $ I la CARROLL HCH i_ ��:� -! SCHODL WM1iTY.1H lR IAYt4A2 K vaml LL XEYlnral tux f5A P11r INdiM11pX. 49 Hl new„ X,Yn4 FXW sett IuP�s[� � j 1 LOT 1, BLOCKt 6'CIMY!! CRBA, m 1668 tlXC ss^ rrctn usfr6urrrre� ,STONE /I CAB A, I 5 5! f ft u N! 1 $Ilhs x ;\ -• ZONED - PUD #3 °. t LUD MED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL iEYISTING STONE LAKES PHASE I mW i F HIGH SCHOOL ILG[ilm rsnxm wr O m esp,l�p -rq pen bx I L IV6[Y ALT 3 U U l \ c 'M1.,` P 3y� mflm.,.as rmPl lu2pw -ss.blr AVFF Amll I la CARROLL HCH i_ ��:� -! SCHODL WM1iTY.1H lR IAYt4A2 K vaml LL XEYlnral tux f5A P11r INdiM11pX. 49 Hl new„ X,Yn4 FXW sett IuP�s[� � j 1 LOT 1, BLOCKt 6'CIMY!! CRBA, m 1668 tlXC ss^ rrctn usfr6urrrre� ,STONE /I CAB A, I 5 5! f ft u N! 1 $Ilhs x CAB. A. ISL- 2 75 umlll ___...___ Si_ °� I - HIE MIA SYX4A PIAiq wwn aXISVIK Ixallx]: I I alslcic m laremm IoIIK . v-5 _ JlJ E %ISTSXG 6' t PRIVACY FENCE: I C fIf � � eFN;XNKEa 11'R FA1515K IS ' NNE IP2 a ° m.tFUE. srrr ro �u NLIH 1 I2}• }j6 50. f]- ! 1b.r {m5PX1El smsi5uescusl � II y ; O IV zel °: � � � � � n - I I gI I� „I '.IJIY�btuPfs�FlYYlsl •�ks -!LLnIu unes�tul` , INN; 1 !F - INE” _ .... 11 6 1. r .w.1K w1o sP>Q, emr,nsa - - �...,... ' C= _ - - lomerpX 5'I �I 11.. 1 1 I P119 R = 2I99 T9 runpX b ? _.a iA I � 5 L =gar I X v 9.13' IIrr Emlxls lrvnYK �! revHxfV In51K s.�s � 1 Xoq� I D € n ZONE - C2 a 2.n 1 es r; a s 3V COMPI Ae5f59 ESIR j N , - - 0 6 Ar sXOVrtee Y NOT LUD = REO MiERCIAL ADDITIONAL RIOHT-OF -VAT REOUESIED FOR PEYTONVILLL AVENUE WILL REQUIRE SITE REDESIGN TO COORDINATE ACCESS. SITE ENTRY, PARXINO LTAIF IDURATION. NO LANDSCAPINO TO BE REDESIGNED TO CWRNINATE WITH APPROVED CDNSTRUCTIOH FLANS FOR PROPOSED tURN LANE. i LL F tt amFtrtr ai v,al ut pHYUXIE nAmv Amu11F5 uF XEtwM➢ IM SuE UAW WPYZ If Ful FA>ttEEXtiXA®RXf2 Hmll 1a 111LIC 1PC {IiEF tt rIO. A.AlE Xsb. wYFl21E lM1AN5 p,IFk EISNfxt1 4Xet YE W E Eta® Xlw TX,Y wAi. ;\ -• ZONED - PUD #3 °. t LUD MED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NS STONE LAKES PHASE I B CAB. A, SL.915 0 rsnxm wr O m esp,l�p -rq pen bx I L IV6[Y ALT 3 U U l \ c 'M1.,` P 3y� mflm.,.as rmPl lu2pw -ss.blr AVFF I la L� &S PP ®]KIYA[K ]].: � IW slR lR IAYt4A2 K vaml LL XEYlnral tux f5A P11r INdiM11pX. 49 Hl new„ X,Yn4 FXW sett IuP�s[� � ' I� ,STONE /I CAB A, SDO' 47,05' PR IVAtT FENCE 7S97N J S 9N ;SC 9TW" F H7 /.7Y' �ow l-iv ���� ���1 3 A CENTER T I �`VER ZON ANTENNA COMPOUND � r FxasE 5 (� FUTURE 40'X40' 1 ACCESSORY BUILDING WaooEX c °=c ,' [��� TkACY Div PkAC[[tE FIIl6 INX SElTIX6 PLNB ®1 I i E cRAPluc seals NS NXId: Sdml Atlalb -52. Xl IVw rsnxm wr � m esp,l�p -rq pen bx l \ c 'M1.,` P 3y� mflm.,.as rmPl lu2pw -ss.blr AVFF L� &S PP ®]KIYA[K ]].: � IW slR lR IAYt4A2 K vaml LL XEYlnral tux f5A P11r INdiM11pX. 49 Hl new„ X,Yn4 FXW sett IuP�s[� � ,Pi�wn. 1uX P.o -B• �i- $Ilhs x CAB. A. ISL- 2 75 umlll ___...___ Si_ °� I - HIE MIA SYX4A PIAiq wwn aXISVIK Ixallx]: a 2s I' i I I alslcic m laremm IoIIK . v-5 _ JlJ E %ISTSXG 6' t PRIVACY FENCE: I C fIf � � eFN;XNKEa 11'R FA1515K IS ' NNE IP2 a ° m.tFUE. srrr ro �u NLIH 1 I2}• }j6 50. f]- ! 1b.r {m5PX1El smsi5uescusl � II y ; O IV zel °: � � � IX[5 G Alfa[ HAE A3 l XWflNVL RIR I FT- - i1N 19p11[E�5 IF.9I1 # Fr- HnUL QEr. [Ya[Nlu: z A3 ? unes�tul` , __...� ..a�! .w.1K w1o sP>Q, emr,nsa v n € 1 m I ul nanrsnaxn, Inc IinnrclK a K � z Y M A runpX _.a iA WL � � r- _.. Emlxls lrvnYK �! revHxfV In51K s.�s � 1 I D € n r�l1p sP AE 2.n . d 9 0 RM'n NOV 2004 WAR DI BLOCK 2 �mm BLOCK 2 V-38$-142,0-100 °0p BAKER ESTATES CAB. A, SL.2917 ZONED - AC 1 LUD = MEDIUN DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONED - ST 2 LUD = NED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL A1rA OA- dNtvFmew nRASXW k LiYV VPirs pt Y4TLL � ¢W6PIDNHrt SCXpOL NLnwci 1 R I1,X8 E.W. X91rX Paa m Y19P56T Ar XvrtX [. A®FprT rBXRSIY IP41�. CLL6d� Y t9amlc P 1x1kICTaSL m.. Ybp11 noX,H XIrWNO taus. ]2115 l N1:WT,.2FLA8 a5A .. NOVEM9ER• 2004 REVISED SITE PLAN TAT PR, B LOM A CAHROLL HIGH SWCOL ADDITION av txR YHR CrV OF SOCTIN AR€ TARNaNT COXNIT. T6YAX N Pcepp�Cg ona g T4 lia 6R OP 3aYlNI.l6'� _BC. IN GPR✓BI 4 eIAY a Xm�. 5.ea�xRrai uRn n Fumanen Ix wwi¢ osbie. eAC ui. um rm.us� lapse, eas up. Fm azca6na, noun wvx]r. T9]1a a ac . W.IW Av.SS w 1um &t. PI9R5 5uatt] ABSieA Fsss, ukXani wINSrY. Y'SYY ry ca ,J� rsnxm wr 1 o� 00 O I rr leer (7 V � s ,acPnaro � NifEl t]F 24' ACCESS EAS MENT Being o 9bJ91 au< Uact of we L bwng eri al lot 1F, 1R f Cemetl Rign Schaal •vaeit[an, an ee i ae Ie u Ne City vl SauN,lak Tpnartl County. ieses atteming m e ap ar give. therem recorded n � abensl k Side 6414 Plel Recerda n! TorranX ceoaly, Texae, by viNUe of e.e,ue Ocoee roe d I Y¢lume 1903], Poge 211 wa by vvtue u that ce an ee rocae in volume 100.1], Pega 2108 and pOl of Lnvt neH Oeee recd anima 1003]. P¢�e 299). 011`weol Recordc pf Torrpnl County, Tevaa, sore - 81 a e 4pc1 bring mere parL'culeay described an lobows; CONREN K et w eaNeesl w al s e Lot iR and b.).g H Xne Eoal g a1 ray .1 Peylww4la Avenue (vanablr TH N Hh 0206'5]" Ensl along a hl 1 u¢ a 0iv[once of THENCE 5 th 89'40'10" East, depaNlnq C E m. ht o! way and <ra T d R v d,alaece 1 S y eee o w mn roe set fur ¢ the - F EnzE , BEGWNING; HENCE Nwlh W 19'59' o alstoxa M 260p test to u point ter TF£laCE South 9438'1]" Fast, v distance of 36.89 {eat to a pant Ior THENCE —h 6921 e3' Evat, a dis.lanae at 484.47 tae[ Xo a pwot Iw THENCE North eT194a ores{, p daslonce of 58].4] feet [o a point Tar RIENCE NarN 0206'b] Evat, a aetonce m 2401 lees la pvin{ ]H NCE 800ln 99'19'{1" E¢sl, ¢ a'wlance 91 676 r4 Xe< !o m point Yw THENCE South 0021'43" west, a diaten of 532.]1 fiet la a point (or (HENCE Nato B9'39'lY w <xE a ai.mme al 6267 feet to the PUCE OF BEGINNING ¢nd camein'x,g 2).7s6 squorc tee[ or 0.6391 acres of lad_ scare. 1 . 60 :nr` 'n I nl LEGEND xvw ae c,..w ,..: 0 o z "' a n eav-s"'°'i roc rc xma m. ulxcp,asz eee, .NUa* m ° I ° o$ LflOER OF PROP08L0 7014E-6 000ROINATFS GEOO6TL tlN 83: 3zsa1s.63 N. 8710' —A ' W 6)1.6 NAW66 aerx,T a <m "a°;w°r�..� va•,eo'.'�a:,�. ": ... a,.mra. awb nsu..mI w.as wroa.s o. ..u [ue.,mv n M Wv rxvM �s w ua e ul . Ps uun wr�e P .. pba .rcme.a n II � II i � - - - - - - - JJ N6919' 4l N Sar_n• I I °.. ET w ai � T bash I I I an ] T � CARROLL INDEPENDENT I T SCHOOL DISTRICT LOT IR, BLOCK 1R CABINET A. SLIDE 6416 I 'i1i4xiAVrcs P.R.TC.T. eaGwNC O ° 3 m oE4rt01 eF R9ro dt � dY58REtx rinq 63: I ��' 9710']-669 w I � EYEV- 671.6' NAV08B j e oej r� y�r 5e9's0'seT 9ir.4Y s3. '.. > CE OF BEtuuuxa c hfaeluex4 sV 01asn FAANFNT I NF TABLE >a s id R� cF �axxwc LIN R DISTA ss €asprOVF Z - L N ' 9' 9'E 3 . ncv, b]ara r dy3 ' O L2 SD9'40'10'E 50.00' i L3 S00'14'S0'W 38.00' ait6i a' a L4 NB9�40'IO 4000' DESCRIPTION PARENT PARCEL a: g f a s t I& E- ,R m car an N;grt sanaae w tb< G[y a aa6h d TprranY County, Tema eccnming Yo n ine mop n or pia[ tnerenl reroreed in CeWnet 0. §Lela 6416. Pivi Recants of Torrent Cpwty Tmes, by ruble pl LM1O[ certain 0eetl reroNetl In 4NUme 10037, Poge 2117 one W ranee vi 1,, carttin peed re .1. N VOCume 1W37, Pe 2106 and by n`rtue el that eMp'u, Peed rewrded in Ya[ame 1003], Poge 2997, africiel Puhpc fta<ar of Teuvnl Cowtr, roes. DESCRIPTION SUP REQUEST AREA Beiss9 a 002755 aces t� t of Iona one bzinq o part o1 Lei 1R, Black ;R of Carrell Nigh Sue Mtlitien. an Ms4an to tlw Cry al Sau Lslake, arfev[ County, Tese ocmrao.q re the mop w 11 Iner.vi rrao.N in = 51itle 646, PIaY Records al ierrwI Couny, Yexva, lhel - Ueetl re WFd in Velum¢ 1CO3], Page 2117 wd by viRue of iMl cert¢,n cprdrd 'n Volume 1�]). Page 2108 wa by I ` . el 1nm aertein Deed rttoryed in Volume t 0 7 Paee 016c1e1 Puhl9; F Records pl 1-1 L avid 0. 2755 cre tract ­g partieaoaa ae:mmee n . blew._ C9NNENCa1G ale uon m fo d < SwEM1eeat wmer el said lot 1R one bang i We Ecsi rgM ay n( peytomiAle Avenue fveriuble THE go E Naih oral's]• E along eve —1 HNh{ ar xpr. a tiatpnee of feet W v pdmt: 1F£NCf South 69'40 14 Eml drpofNoq sma Easl rgNt of x M crves�g xaid Lap IR, eistonee fii +.e] f <N Iv an eaa mtl set [w T= entl bdnq Inc P—F OF BEr7NNWG; . Nunn 9P 18'50 Edat. a tlutor,cv of ]9.W Nrl to me imp nM THE &. AO 10 —1. d 1 1 !0.110 1 rod tf E s m 001450 w 1 n a 1 m 3o a9 a rod E 09' e - da l BEGIN M nteming 1,200 square Eeal or 002155 ncr<x of _ 77' Flush -Mono( lryrought -iron gate Monopole ° H "eid al ] Oese !pole ® p�ydovnd 30' slab la�wp.w,e� Apmos. fi - a 1]' Proposed 40 • Equipment Cabinal s[f 9iid 4d —� 0 - -r t3rick and spli[Face block W match ® xaga min- ar -�.. w�uumr � "' a n eav-s"'°'i roc rc xma m. ulxcp,asz eee, .NUa* m ° I ° o$ LflOER OF PROP08L0 7014E-6 000ROINATFS GEOO6TL tlN 83: 3zsa1s.63 N. 8710' —A ' W 6)1.6 NAW66 aerx,T a <m "a°;w°r�..� va•,eo'.'�a:,�. ": ... a,.mra. awb nsu..mI w.as wroa.s o. ..u [ue.,mv n M Wv rxvM �s w ua e ul . Ps uun wr�e P .. pba .rcme.a n II � II i � - - - - - - - JJ N6919' 4l N Sar_n• I I °.. ET w ai � T bash I I I an ] T � CARROLL INDEPENDENT I T SCHOOL DISTRICT LOT IR, BLOCK 1R CABINET A. SLIDE 6416 I 'i1i4xiAVrcs P.R.TC.T. eaGwNC O ° 3 m oE4rt01 eF R9ro dt � dY58REtx rinq 63: I ��' 9710']-669 w I � EYEV- 671.6' NAV08B j e oej r� y�r 5e9's0'seT 9ir.4Y s3. '.. > CE OF BEtuuuxa c hfaeluex4 sV 01asn FAANFNT I NF TABLE >a s id R� cF �axxwc LIN R DISTA ss €asprOVF Z - L N ' 9' 9'E 3 . ncv, b]ara r dy3 ' O L2 SD9'40'10'E 50.00' i L3 S00'14'S0'W 38.00' ait6i a' a L4 NB9�40'IO 4000' DESCRIPTION PARENT PARCEL a: g f a s t I& E- ,R m car an N;grt sanaae w tb< G[y a aa6h d TprranY County, Tema eccnming Yo n ine mop n or pia[ tnerenl reroreed in CeWnet 0. §Lela 6416. Pivi Recants of Torrent Cpwty Tmes, by ruble pl LM1O[ certain 0eetl reroNetl In 4NUme 10037, Poge 2117 one W ranee vi 1,, carttin peed re .1. N VOCume 1W37, Pe 2106 and by n`rtue el that eMp'u, Peed rewrded in Ya[ame 1003], Poge 2997, africiel Puhpc fta<ar of Teuvnl Cowtr, roes. DESCRIPTION SUP REQUEST AREA Beiss9 a 002755 aces t� t of Iona one bzinq o part o1 Lei 1R, Black ;R of Carrell Nigh Sue Mtlitien. an Ms4an to tlw Cry al Sau Lslake, arfev[ County, Tese ocmrao.q re the mop w 11 Iner.vi rrao.N in = 51itle 646, PIaY Records al ierrwI Couny, Yexva, lhel - Ueetl re WFd in Velum¢ 1CO3], Page 2117 wd by viRue of iMl cert¢,n cprdrd 'n Volume 1�]). Page 2108 wa by I ` . el 1nm aertein Deed rttoryed in Volume t 0 7 Paee 016c1e1 Puhl9; F Records pl 1-1 L avid 0. 2755 cre tract ­g partieaoaa ae:mmee n . blew._ C9NNENCa1G ale uon m fo d < SwEM1eeat wmer el said lot 1R one bang i We Ecsi rgM ay n( peytomiAle Avenue fveriuble THE go E Naih oral's]• E along eve —1 HNh{ ar xpr. a tiatpnee of feet W v pdmt: 1F£NCf South 69'40 14 Eml drpofNoq sma Easl rgNt of x M crves�g xaid Lap IR, eistonee fii +.e] f <N Iv an eaa mtl set [w T= entl bdnq Inc P—F OF BEr7NNWG; . Nunn 9P 18'50 Edat. a tlutor,cv of ]9.W Nrl to me imp nM THE &. AO 10 —1. d 1 1 !0.110 1 rod tf E s m 001450 w 1 n a 1 m 3o a9 a rod E 09' e - da l BEGIN M nteming 1,200 square Eeal or 002155 ncr<x of _ MNq M1 -m any Uw Tdmoval shall ha Psesenetpn bhp -- once, a6 a r meMed 0� ©mod a�L7CItE1 SITE PLAN SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER LOT 1 R, BLOCK 1 CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION 301 S. PEYTONVILLE AVE. SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 APPLICANT: ZONE SYSTEMS, INC. 1602 HANDLEY DRIVE SUITE A DALLAS, TX 75208 (214)9414440 OWNER: CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 3051 DOVE ROAD GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 (617) 949-6260 January J. 2006 N n 77' Flush -Mono( lryrought -iron gate Monopole ° H "eid al ] Oese !pole ® p�ydovnd 30' slab la�wp.w,e� Apmos. fi - a 1]' Proposed 809 Equipment Cabinal s[f 9iid 4d —� screening wall - -r t3rick and spli[Face block W match school eel reel tq.�pinem proper( y building g eoulwlary Nf REC AREA to V 50A1E: =f0 MNq M1 -m any Uw Tdmoval shall ha Psesenetpn bhp -- once, a6 a r meMed 0� ©mod a�L7CItE1 SITE PLAN SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER LOT 1 R, BLOCK 1 CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION 301 S. PEYTONVILLE AVE. SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 APPLICANT: ZONE SYSTEMS, INC. 1602 HANDLEY DRIVE SUITE A DALLAS, TX 75208 (214)9414440 OWNER: CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 3051 DOVE ROAD GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 (617) 949-6260 January J. 2006 N n F Case No. Attachment C ZA04 -090 Page 3 Tower Inventory for Verizon Wireless sites in Southlake We currently have 4 antenna locations within the City Limits of Southlake. 1) Southlake Water tower located west of Randol Mill Road is 1.4 miles northwest of the Carroll High School target, and is too far to provide adequate coverage of the residential area we are trying to cover located just southeast of the school. Our antenna height is at 85' on this water tower. 2) Southlake Water tower located east of North White Chapel Road is also 1.4 miles away, northeast of the Carroll High School target and will not provide adequate coverage of the residential area. Our antenna height is 68' on this tower. 3) American Tower Corporation tower located in the northern portion of Southlake, just east of Trophy Club, is 3.5 miles north of the High School and too far to provide coverage of the residential area in question. Our antenna height is 229' on this tower. 4) Kimball Road site located on an existing power line north of State Highway 114 & west of North Kimball Road is 3.5 miles away. This site is less than a mile northeast of the Southlake Town Hall area and too far to provide coverage of the residential area in question. We are on the top of this power line tower at 91'. 5) Mustang Stadium water tower is located ' / 4 mile southeast of the Southlake boundary in Grapevine and covers a very small portion of Southlake. Extending the antenna heights on either of the water towers in Southlake would not provide the required coverage. We are trying to extend the Kimball Road power line site to provide better coverage of the northern portion of the Southlake Town Hall area, in addition to adding another site near South Carroll Avenue between Continental Boulevard & Southlake Boulevard. We have been working with Gary Gregg of Southlake to resolve our coverage issues of the Town Hall area, and have briefed him on the 3 sites we are currently planning in Southlake. The Timmaron Home Owners association owns the Continental Boulevard site and Richard Taylor thinks the homeowners will approve this Flag Pole. We have a landowner interested in the South Carroll Avenue site, but have issues with it being lined up with a grass runway. I will try to resolve everything this week with the South Carroll Avenue site. Gary Gregg may be an asset in getting these sites through. He is the Manager of Technical Services for Southlake and his phone number is 817 - 481 -2150. He is very concerned with coverage of the Southlake area, RECD JINN 0 4 ME Case No. Attachment C ZA04 -090 Page 4 ZONE SYSTEMS INC 1620 HANDLEY, SUITE A, DALLAS, TEXAS 75208 February 10, 2005 Southlake City Planning and Zoning Commission 1400 Main Street Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: ZA04 -090 Specific Use Permit Verizon Wireless Carroll High School Dear Chair and Commissioners: We have investigated three items since the last hearing on this SUP request. The first item is the antenna structure itself. We have changed our antenna style to a flagpole style structure. We have used this type of pole in a number of other locations. They are seen as a flag pole or as a simple pole with no outward attachments. Most people do not notice them or do not recognize them as mobile telephone antenna structures. The flag pole type structure will be a light brown color to match the color of the school buildings. Flag pole type antenna structures throughout the area are white in color and tend to be rather bright on a sunny day. The light brown color will make the pole less obvious. The second item for investigation was the location of the pole on the school property. The objective of this mobile telephone cell site is to server the residential areas to the south and east of this property. In order to do that the antennas need to be as far southeast as possible. The antenna site is generally in the center of the school campus in order to be away from homes east and south of the campus. Moving the antenna farther north will impair the service that is to be provided to the south and east by the antenna. The antenna will have the least visible impact to all sides of the school by its location in the center of the campus. We wish to maintain the current location in order for the antennas to function efficiently. The third item of investigation is the review of alternative structures. We have located all structures that are anywhere near to this site. There are two. The two structures are shown on the attached maps. They are both monopoles maintained by other cellular companies. They are identified as Greenbriar and Bear Creek on the maps. They are located near Davis Boulevard. They are immediately north of a site shown as Indian Knoll that contains Verizon Wireless' nearest antenna facility to the southwest of Carroll High School. These two sites are too close to the Indian Knoll site to be used as an alternative to the proposed site at Carroll High School. The propagation analysis map clearly shows that the two sites already have good coverage. The location of antennas on either of these sites would interfere with the Indian Knoll site and not provide the needed coverage to the east. There are two attached maps. Each provides locations of all Verizon sites that now serve this part of the city. One map is a road map and one is the propagation or coverage map providing the radio coverage of the existing sites that serve this area. Please call me if you have any questions and I will answer them or get the answer if I do not know the Case No. Attachment C ZA04 -090 Page 5 answer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Peter Kavanagh Case No. ZA04 -090 Attachment C Page 6 0 Verizon Carroll H5 proposed site Verizon Existing Sites SOL THLAKE 1 Nearby Existing monopoles * �' i ° Water Tower r a Nater Tower ° c a f G+reenbriar Bear Creek u am Y Indian Knoll I �o- 1 r a I EYVILLE ar � � a ¢ .1 SOUTHLAKE C6 * �� ••yllr� � 6 U -_ i , .. irxnr D �r..r. o� 00 0 b� a� 00 (n Water Tower , A4 I° ORTH INDID N KNOLL' . do I S©UTHLAKt-- lft'il INDIAN KNOLL B INVALIDNOLL INDIAN KNOLL G WT.' MF NIS y two . I l id ry O jil - Ld FA M IV I MA III r:._.. I ..... O OEM= 0 Q cc) ry O jil - Ld FA M IV I MA III r:._.. I ..... O OEM= d 3 V� # L S: L REPL e_p 0 C 1 � C arro ii !: AVE. al� I �. L S: L REPL e_p 0 C 1 � A i INK a fl N RO PAR. 3OUTHLAKE N1T2 UTHLAKE MRALL AK GROVE RTH CAP.ROLL AVENUE FIROLL HIGH SCHOOL A UTH CARROLL AVE B k,AMP VLi nian z)4,nUGI SAINT MARTI SOUTH CARROLL AVENUF E� CONTINENTAL_BOULEVARQ RE -- TEM UTHLAKE;� UTH CARROLL AVENUE D S`J RECD J AN 0 4 2000 zA0 -ono Case No. Attachment C ZA04 -090 Page 10 d Al r A i INK a fl N RO PAR. 3OUTHLAKE N1T2 UTHLAKE MRALL AK GROVE RTH CAP.ROLL AVENUE FIROLL HIGH SCHOOL A UTH CARROLL AVE B k,AMP VLi nian z)4,nUGI SAINT MARTI SOUTH CARROLL AVENUF E� CONTINENTAL_BOULEVARQ RE -- TEM UTHLAKE;� UTH CARROLL AVENUE D S`J RECD J AN 0 4 2000 zA0 -ono Case No. Attachment C ZA04 -090 Page 10 RTROPHY_CLU , ! "TROPHY CLUB LA LANA REPL ESTLAKE NGN CO SOUTHLAKE NNOC 90UTHLAKE3, OXFIRE LANE WARNER 300' NORT LLEdOAT UTHLAKE :: -`:', AK G ROkaE PARK AIC CiF KIMBALL R47A. UTHLAKE WT2 SOUTHLAKE W r'C RTH CARROLL AVENUE ARROLL HIGH SCHOOL A SOUTH CAF s s SA #NT MARTI PPUTH CARROLL AVENUE E1 _ 71a- CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD 1 ]� TEM UTHLAKE�7 UTH CARROLL AVENUE USTANG STAU'..` E i ullw ie Case No. Attachment C ZA04 -090 Page 11 i RTROPHY_CLU , ! "TROPHY CLUB LA LANA REPL ESTLAKE NGN CO SOUTHLAKE NNOC 90UTHLAKE3, OXFIRE LANE WARNER 300' NORT LLEdOAT UTHLAKE :: -`:', AK G ROkaE PARK AIC CiF KIMBALL R47A. UTHLAKE WT2 SOUTHLAKE W r'C RTH CARROLL AVENUE ARROLL HIGH SCHOOL A SOUTH CAF s s SA #NT MARTI PPUTH CARROLL AVENUE E1 _ 71a- CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD 1 ]� TEM UTHLAKE�7 UTH CARROLL AVENUE USTANG STAU'..` E i ullw ie Case No. Attachment C ZA04 -090 Page 11 A •+t rl 1 rr i l H R r F .� ,�Ap, ESTLAKE NGN COW UTHLAKE NNG SOUTHLAKE #3, OXFIRE LANE WARNER . tIORTH LLE !_ BOAT STG RAG UTHLAKE # - 3 AKGROVEPARK AK UFit1VE PAR M8ALL ROA PAR SOUTHLAKE WT2 SOUTHLAKE WT AK GRAVE 9 RTH CAViOLL AVENUE gym, ra. r.nn„ A,,r ARROLL HIGH SCHOOL A SOUTH CARROLt AVE B k.,AM Lt r+�Cin 34,C11AJL SAMIT MARTIN 9DUTH CARPOLL_AVENIIE EJE NTINENTAL_EOULEVARD TEM E3 - ALL STRT SGUTWLAE•. 3 SUTH CARROLL AVENUE �. . US7TANG SEADIUIv Y., RECD J AN 0 4 2005 Case No. Attachment C ZA04 -090 Page 12 RECD J AN 0 4 2005 0 - 1 o -- t o Case No. Attachment C ZA04 -090 Page 13 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA04 -90 Review No.: Two ect Name: Site Plan for Telecommunications Tower SUP Carroll APPLICANT /CONSULTANT: Zone Systems (for Verizon Wireless) John Brumley 1602 Handley Drive, Suite A Dallas, TX 75208 Phone: (214) 941 -4440 OWNER: Carroll ISD Date of Review: 1/14/05 School Harry Ingalls 3051 Dove Rd. Grapevine, TX 76051 Phone: (817) 949 -8260 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 1/04/05 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 481 -2073. No indication of the number of users this site shall accommodate has been indicated. A telecommunication tower must be 1) used by two or more wireless telecommunications providers; or 2) designed and built so as to be capable of use by two or more wireless telecommunications providers and the owner of the antenna must certify to the City that the tower is available for use by another wireless telecommunications provider on a reasonable and non - discri minatory basis. 2. Label the type of construction material and finish to be used on the tower and equipment cabinets /structures. Towers shall be maintained with either a galvanized steel finish or, subject to any applicable standards of the FAA, be painted a neutral color so as to reduce visual obtrusiveness. Highly reflective surfaces shall not be permitted. No glare shall be emitted to adjacent properties. 3. Label the distance to the nearest buildings. Insure that adequate clearance exists between the tower and buildings. 4. Provide a tree survey meeting the requirements of the Tree Preservation ordinance of the area to be affected by construction. Existing mature tree growth and natural land forms on the site shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible. In some cases, such as towers sited on large, wooded lots, natural growth around the property perimeter may be sufficient buffer. Mitigation of any tree removal shall be in accordance to the Tree Preservation Ordinance, as amended. Informational Comments: Case No. ZA 04 -090 Attachment D Page 1 After receiving the appropriate zoning approval, no tower, antenna, or other appurtenance shall be installed without first obtaining a building permit issued by the Building Official. The applicant should be aware that the following issues must be addressed either prior to issuance of a building permit and /or during the operational period of the tower: a) All towers shall meet or exceed current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other agency of the federal or state government with the authority to regulate towers and antennas. If such standards and regulations are changed, then the owners of the towers and antennas governed by this ordinance shall bring such towers and antennas into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within six (6) months of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unless a more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling federal agency. Failure to bring towers and antennas into compliance with such revised standards and regulations shall constitute grounds for the removal of the tower or antenna at the owner's expense. b) Applicants shall provide the city with certification of compliance with ANSI and IEEE Standards regarding human exposure to non - ionizing electromagnetic radiation ( "NIER "). c) For antennas, towers and /or supporting structures which are to be located in residential neighborhoods and that are to be equipped with high intensity white lights, the applicant shall provide the city with certification from the FCC of EA approval. d) To ensure the structural integrity of towers, the owner of a tower shall ensure that the tower is constructed and maintained in compliance with standards contained in applicable local building codes ( "Uniform Building Codes, UBC ") and applicable standards for towers, published by the Electronics Industries Association Standard 222, ( "EIA- 222 ") "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna towers and Antenna Support Structures." e) A tower inspection report (based upon applicable UBC and EIA -222 standards) shall be prepared by an engineer licensed in the state of Texas and filed with the Building Official in accordance to the following schedule: a) monopoles - -at least once every ten (10) years; b) lattice towers - -at least once every (5) years; and c) guyed towers - -at least once every three (3) years. However, the Building Official may require an immediate inspection should an issue of safety be raised. f) If, upon inspection, the tower fails to comply with such codes and standards and constitutes a danger to persons or property, then upon notice being provided to the owner of the tower, the owner shall have thirty (30) days to bring such tower into compliance with such standards, unless the applicant can demonstrate a hardship and thus establish the need for additional time. If the owner fails to bring such tower into compliance within said thirty (30) days, the city shall remove such tower at the owner's expense. Case No. ZA 04 -090 Attachment D Page 2 g) The applicant shall provide the city with a certificate of insurance, issued by an insurance company licensed to do business in the state of Texas indicating that the applicant carries comprehensive general liability insurance with limits of liability thereunder of not less than: bodily injury: $500,000 for injury to any one person and $1,000,000 for all injuries sustained by more than one person in any occurrence; property damage: $1,000,000 for damage as a result of any one accident. The applicant shall provide the city with a renewal certificate within then (10) business days of each renewal. Any insurance required to be provided by the applicant herein may be provided by a blanket insurance policy covering this property and other locations occupied by the applicant, provided such blanket insurance policy complies with all of the other requirements as to the type and amount of insurance required. The applicant may also fulfill the requirements under this section through a program of self - insurance, subject to approval by the city, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If the applicant elects to self - insure, then the applicant shall furnish the city with a letter stating that there is a self - insurance program in effect that provides for the same, or greater, coverage than required of the applicant herein. The applicant agrees to furnish the city with certificate of insurance certifying that the applicant has in force and effect the above specified insurance. The certificate and renewal certificates shall provide that insurance shall not be canceled or changed unless 30 days' prior written notice is just given to the city. h) Each backhaul provider shall be identified and have all necessary franchises, permits, and certificates. The identity of other providers who co- locate to the site and their backhaul providers shall be provided as well. i) No lettering, symbols, images, or trademarks large enough to be legible to occupants of vehicular traffic on any adjacent roadway shall be placed on, or affixed to, any part of a telecommunications tower, platform, antenna or ancillary structure. j) All construction shall comply with all ordinances of the city not in conflict with this section. k) In addition to the usual application fees for rezoning or specific use permit requests, the applicant shall reimburse the city the actual cost of professional services, provided by an engineer or other professional, that may be required to review the application and provide expertise. 1) If high voltage is necessary, signs shall be posted every 20' on any exterior fencing which state, "Danger- -High Voltage." The operator shall also post "No Trespassing" signs. m) Any signal interference complaints associated with telecommunications towers or related equipment shall be addressed in accordance with FCC rules and procedures. n) The owner of a tower and /or related telecommunications facilities shall notify the Building Official when the tower or other structures have ceased operating as part of a telecommunications system authorized by the FCC. Within six (6) months of the date the tower ceases to operate as part of an authorized telecommunications system, the tower Case No. ZA 04 -090 Attachment D Page 3 must either be removed from the site, or a certificate of occupancy must be obtained to allow another permitted use of the tower. If within six (6) months, the owner fails to remove the tower or obtain proper authorization for the use of the tower, the Building Official shall revoke the certificate of occupancy for the tower and notify the city attorney to pursue enforcement remedies. o) Tower owner(s) shall bear all demolition costs. Denotes Informational Comment N: \Coinmunity Development\REV\2004\04-090 SUP Ldoc Case No. ZA 04 -090 Attachment D Page 4 Surrounding Property Owners Specific Use Permit — Telecommunications Antenna W ° 2 4 5 6 ° WESSSOUTHLAKE BLVD n Case No. ZA04 -090 6 2 50 49 j Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage L Myers Meadow - HOA "R -PM" Medium Density Resid. 4.898 2. 7- Eleven Inc. "C -3" Retail Commercial 0.994 3. Southlake Safeco Ltd "C -3" Retail Commercial 1.312 4. Southlake 114 Investors "C -3" Retail Commercial 0.809 5. Southlake Blvd Presbyterian "CS" Retail Commercial 5.024 6. Realty Income Texas Prop L "C -3" Retail Commercial 0.970 7. Southridge Lakes - HOA "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 3.443 8. Bologna, Anthony & Susan "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.582 9. Nuese, David & Sandra "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.350 10. Rabbani, Mahmood & Mahnaz "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.435 11. Harless, William & Mary "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.391 12. Rodgers, Craig & Kathy "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.390 13. Whitacre, Charles & Vaunda "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.383 14. Jain, Anuj & Bhanu "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.382 15. Ka ich, Jack & Kelll "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.345 16. Wendell, Berry & Jamie "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.361 17. Geroge, Daniel & Susan "R -PM" Medium Density Resid. 0.532 18. Lambeth, Jeffrey & Felicia "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.569 19. Stelling, Richard & Jennifer "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.401 20. Saeec, Quaiser & Samrin "R -PIJD" Medium Density Resid. 0.333 21. Griffeth, Suzanne Marie "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.444 22. Bruce Family Trust "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.535 23. Williams, Richard & P. "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.430 24. Palmer, Wilfred M III "R -PM" Medium Density Resid. 0.379 Attachment E Page 1 25. Candler, Michael "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.314 26. Dominici, James & Maria "R-PUT)" Medium Density Resid. 0.518 27. Sivula, Antii & Kirst "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.553 28. Roberts Sean & Deena "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.563 29. Schafer, Thomas "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.359 30. Armstrong, Edward & Lagel "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.732 31. Finn, Robert & Tammy "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.432 32. McGovern, Richard & Brenda 'R-PUT)" Medium Density Resid. 0.331 33. Gilmore, Edward & Lagel "R -PUD" Medium Density Resid. 0.301 34. Seitz, Kerry & Suzanne "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.560 35. Swieter, Kenneth & Danielle "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.463 36. Mamerow, Bernard & H "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.461 37. Hammond, Robert & Pamela "SF -20A' Medium Density Resid. 0.461 38. Howell, Glenna Jinx "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.462 39. Vassios, Michael & Lisa "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.464 40. Little, Steven & Leigh "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.457 41. Vanyo, Arole & Gordon "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.459 42. Robinson, Kenneth "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.459 43. Simcho, David "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.459 44. Rogers, Dennis & Sheila "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.480 45. Castro, Wilfredo & Terri "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.526 46. Siegler, Steve & Andrea "SF -20A' Medium Density Resid. 0.469 47. Tan, Simon & Jennie "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.478 48. Park, Louis & Tina "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.476 49. Lewandowski, Mark & Audra "SF -20A" Medium Density Resid. 0.733 50. May, Clentis & Wanda "S -P -2" Medium Density Resid. 1.020 51. Akard, Larry "S -P -2" Medium Density Resid. 1.009 52. May, Wanda Jean "S -P -2" Medium Density Resid. 1.954 53. Greenwood, Robert Curtis "S -P -2" Medium Density Resid. 0.980 54. Davis Donald "S -P -2" Medium Density Resid. 1.000 55. Ott Real Estate Inv Ltd 11 0-1" Retail Commercial 1.349 56. Bradner Central Co. "C -2" Retail Commercial 2.260 57. Carroll Isd "S -P -1" Public / Semi- Pubic 55.030 Case No. ZA04 -090 Attachment E Page 2 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Specific Use Permit — Telecommunications Antenna Notices Sent: Fifty -nine (59) Responses: One (1) received from outside the 200' notification area: • Email received from Janet Elliott, 811 Independence Parkway, Southlake, in favor, "This email is in response to the controversy over the tower(s) that Verizon would like to install in our area. We have 4 Verizon phones and none of them work well in our home. We desperately need more towers in the area. Our home is located about 1 mile from the high school in question." Letter received 5 -9 -05 from Rick and Brenda McGovern, 1406 Cambridge Crossing, Southlake, Tx, in opposition. See attached letter. Case No. ZA04 -090 Attachment F Page 1 May 9, 2005 TO: Southlake Mayor and City Council We wish to raise our objections to the proposed Verizon Wireless telecommunications (cell phone) tower at Carroll Senior High. As Southlake residents, we respectfully urge the Mayor and City Council to reject the specific use permit, based on the following: • This issue should he assessed with the public's interests, not Verizon's commercial interests, in mind. Cell phone towers are large, highly visible structures that will haunt the Southlake horizon for years to come. Their development should be carefully regulated, to avoid (a) the proliferation of cell phone towers in the community, and (b) ensure each tower serves the strategic need of the majority of prospective cell phone carriers, rather than the interests of one. • The proposed cell phone tower will not benefit all Southlake residents, many of whom are served by other cell phone carriers. Verizon cannot guarantee that other cell phone carriers will utilize the tower in the future. • The proposed cell phone tower is mainly to enhance Verizon's coverage in Southlake, not establish coverage. Verizon's contention is that some of its customers are not able to utilize cell phone in their homes. Other cell phone carriers are available for service in the area to those who wish to utilize a cell phone in their home. Furthermore, the vast majority of Southlake residents do not rely solely on cell phone coverage for home use. • Verizon has not demonstrated a bonafrde customer need for the proposed tower. What percentage of Verizon's Southlake customers are currently complaining of poor coverage? Shouldn't a higher burden of proof be required before committing to a long -term eyesore that could be unnecessary in a few years due to ongoing changes in wireless technology? • The proposed tower is a monopole, not a flagpole as some would like to characterize it. Tice base diameter is over 3.5 feet wide; at 77 feet high, it's more like a smokestack than a flagpole. It's presence will negatively impact property values for the surrounding homeowners in Stone Lakes, Park Place, Akard, and Stonebury subdivisions. • The Planning & Zoning Commission (P&ZQ failed to address other cell phone carrier coverage maps in the area, and whether Verizon's technology (or lack thereof) is a factor requiring more cell phone towers in the area than other cell phone carriers. Do other cell phone carriers have similar coverage issues in Southlake, and ifnot, why not? From the outset of public hearings, the P &ZC was more interested in making changes to the tower's appearance, vs. questioning the need of the tower. + Both Verizon and CISD failed to openly communicate the matter to the surrounding neighborhoods, CISD "discreetly" communicated its proposed lease with Verizon to only a handful of designated neighborhood representatives, most of who failed to act responsibly. SPITZ notices were not properly mailed until the issue was raised to the P&7-C's attention. • Carroll ISO's use of public school property for third -party commercial venues should strike fear in time hearls of all homeowners that surround school property. We thank you for your service and ask that you reject tine permit as it currently stands. Sincerely, Rick and Brenda McGovern 1406 Cambridge Crossing Southlake, TX 76092 L& --_I_ MA Y - 92005 Case No. ZA 04 -090 Attachment F Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 05 -008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS, ANTENNAS AND ANCILLARY STRUCTURES ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1R, BLOCK 1R, CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", AND AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT `B" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a Specific Use Permit for telecommunications towers, antennas and ancillary structures has been requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in the property zoned as "S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section 45.1 (3 1) and 45.8 of the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have afforded the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, and, WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that the granting of such Specific Use Permit is in the best interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. A Specific Use Permit is hereby granted for telecommunications towers, antennas and ancillary structures on the property being legally described as Lot 1R, Block 1R, Carroll High School Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet `A', Slide s 6415 & 6416, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A ", and Case No. Attachment G ZA04 -090 Page 1 as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" and providing an effective date, subject to the provisions contained in the comprehensive zoning ordinance and the restrictions set forth herein. The following specific requirements and special conditions shall be applicable to the granting of this Specific Use Permit: I. 2. 3. 4. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2005. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE II ATTEST: Lori Farwell, TRMC City Secretary Andy Wambsganss, Mayor Case No. Attachment G ZA04 -090 Page 2 EXHIBIT "A" Being legally described as Lot 1R, Block 1R, Carroll High School Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet `A', Slides 6415 & 6416, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Case No. Attachment G ZA04 -090 Page 3 o� 00 0 I 1� 1� n v �yyy AKE WATERFORD DRIVE kWk ea y I e I ffflll f, I I 21 1 v t m. al M um PX11 I 1 g�w y I < i I - e .I I 20NED - PU0 n3 LDD = IUD DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 8 STONE LAKES ?RASE I ao CAB, A. SL.915 fy S a Wa m q n fr' I /� f C '�r25 o- is F(j S`TONE LAKP§ PH�SE� - CAB A. Gyp- 679 g: tl FO IST I/ f NIA "[ Iv{[r rorcF • � /` f .eru,w mllmm nw 1 n n. o� P.O.@. f ] e �ee ]6R]LL FIFL L ¢� P `yam. Irsc ] CAB. A.. . 2 75 °'"Pinm.ap0iXUrf0tl01 ArM FTRRT @_: anaosme NTIRINT<ITIA c c P � fII1` I p III][III v _ R,fl 4G'#S 1N91w •`. �_ 1 � NHIHIH I o g y uan 1 I T I � tt[ FI41 CNZSOAL I" � `•'7 � . LOT pF Axr G RP sErr[R `VEE713oNAHTEWU. v CDAWWu,� ] e.af Ewrr ; r " .rover] RE 4ffYAr ..: ..�.� . n m ACC €SSCNRY e11ILDING d - M .. II .. m I � �[ 11- Eexcx .YC ,alcr[a 512 � YpLiL ,W[M } I 4,`ILl,Sf II a � 11NC_R1NfD _�>� 9. ,•.n.r� -lj] 1 4 1 R. R ZONE Rar s CZ rare: LOO = RmL C ZIIIAL ]WITIORLL I lIO -YAr RjMsrE0 FM PEYFLWYILLE AVE)" FILL XMIFE SITE I>CFESIM TO CM*INAIE ACCESS• SITE EIRar. af ?I IW CONF]AIMAT,ON. uo 4]q?SdPINO M lE IECES[CMO TO COOPAI HATE m OMOI'{g C%SrMK1tRe YlANS FOR FF POKO ILFC L].IE. Y 1aa'X0� R+r,Sa amlYf k+ I, laC reuTn.Y u R+i Rl [IDYfaf M i[ Xili[iWti ria�iu11�1.AALS aaM. �w.l[5 aYl,ny uel4rif 'T ,[ AA.04o0g R�fi'f? mr, 2 2 2004 MvFMBER• 20M X j REMED SCPE PLAN y ' D BLO 2 F`5� X @COCK MT 136 >3wcx x an V.38 142, 100 l € f >L I] acecoc nrnnrt R ' m va r� pTL' P] FPV[IA/R °00 @�ER ESTATES K CAB. A. 51--2917 ZONED - AG 2IXJED ' ST 2 LUD = LIEOIUY DENSITY RESIDENTIAL , LDp = N£D DENSITY RESIDENTIAL M. n,c.. +.w. Lacs t w rXl x. A1e6 ,w r wmir .X a ua w r�av +m •- '>a __ r iu su±m Wu . [a lieu G: µ'ram i`uii... Mw O � O � O O IN rear l� n QQ � 0 x�ea7Y ry DESC RIPWIN d �a5 a pan r w sraaa I ea,n0 . aea$ t a ar.1 lanm�t cwm�y � - 9 se eta« War 9werel ep�� rt owls, ad 'n In Ge} . kkra � � o05�v.q. €t lY sw #M�i w v r enma e w x. 1�]F, r. vas a.,9 c +p ar O.rd )7, >'wr Ypps unroel v.E,aa Ew�Ertonc ar � irm rm r rr w saw,ra >t <«ar ar aG i� , � wN g n rcx Eery Aaa+..at .ar er Pgtcnay brow f•a.:>py S r�rZYl[E � 3'a5 5 ' E ®4 Nrw em} Eeet +ri!a al .'aF. o Wrvcr m nEHCE Eos•.n.Y o• e9M en- aae CON � ar rro, W � aM L R a seance M 56l ii krt 1 wen m a eet fw e earv� Inr vuGE Ci BEOw.ws'; ,iR��;E`: In mlr5o• eaaL . ar.�e. a r xr.av r..t b . rw,t Ix r uann er l9•aa• w.N. 9 eat�,a. ar an.rz r la a w.! r nsi� rrvn arca•aF• E >r +. _ �.�a.x. d Y..pS rrr m a som re, r > IE,rcc srn� ar5o•ar• rmt . ar.9.. ae amsy r..! a a c art r« rIM+rT SrNn W'Y. Y 'eat, a e.Wxr rr S3Y Sa W b > pw.t br 1WimE Mwls 80 rs{, a aaa,r:a 9r 9287 Nre la IM RKC 6P e:phgrvG w wwp 1F.F40 ra+ara 6r., r Oblet core N 1«A. !I �I — — — J in at,a CARROLL INOEPENCENT SCHOOL CISTRICT LCT IR BLOCK 1R CABINET A, SLOE 6416 P.R.T.C.T.� d a c rr nx an ?- ira9•Ia.u• n wei a z 4 S O A r I v Vi,� £.SE.d T R NT A c Lac A, E 5R m Nays tOgn 5c8>s A1}. %sn n Mlw % ur iina"rie ��br >Iemmv.nv. s i ii w w :nar r 1Mr .rnm, w.c rraarna ., ,n,a„�. ,003F. P ,. Y, OB arN W .vtw M rncM1 sa�ti �pra rreerara .n „eearn SawF. Pc - ,a QE8CFUPp SUP RE QUEST AREA errq 9 9.d2Yy ear v ! k>. ana °a+q a �n 0. 9bA C rr.It c= It SS.y qy,6, awv� d iorc >d toeng_ 5.mi W Ww. of Aer ..n,;1. a.e .vxrea n t�rx. lover. ra zr lr ays y rr., .r a..b ramctd r rs,a.,. I 3F. aay. Yvee wN y v .. ar w a l9car- r>a 5 �. w na>I � Era - N Y S C' ! x aaA 0.0Y'755 our t aeyq one Pam a..ar epa re oa rpa laa.W vl +lr 8aawoet carom N era [at F ' c'^^9 r Grl +pnv r .s. al Pgien.ry •+vrv9 I.>berr ,dCE AaeVi atgrrSY CerL ^!^^C :-.d Ems. tiler 9r .q., a i.19n>r r ys rp I.r, voxt -, N'E Saaq L a • fart do Each yN .q eve rw � It a �x>n9 e w i a ia n 7xEri[: o rao�r ao.pa rw b m. .>. r ! carrcr, InEn[E SpH.h 80're'1 ®• Eet,, q sUfrNr s•r MOa br, to a acn re} t !ar cores •wEnEE %sJt W 950• mgt. a &r W >a Od I >N b m rran red Ir srrw EfsE 99'.Y 0 vw frsr. 0al" Inr PupE OE BECaOanC ores �s^+w r.5V0 am,are I... u o7y5 a>Iyr G q Wrought- imngele /// r2•caiPNrr G z � Wes 9lyra � a 0 `o W � I Mx..e.5a' a W Proposed O CF T i le Equpm"t Cehirrel r, AD sueening It 6rlck ana sPFHaMe 8'Caro WWa black Yo ma" p O G bfnppigaiytir,a aclgpl n n erc�a�. Ekr4S Eit4 - 'EL Prnpaied equlpmsm wbinel PRO POSED MONOPOLE ELEV ATION NOT TO sCALE A r I v Vi,� £.SE.d T R NT A c Lac A, E 5R m Nays tOgn 5c8>s A1}. %sn n Mlw % ur iina"rie ��br >Iemmv.nv. s i ii w w :nar r 1Mr .rnm, w.c rraarna ., ,n,a„�. ,003F. P ,. Y, OB arN W .vtw M rncM1 sa�ti �pra rreerara .n „eearn SawF. Pc - ,a QE8CFUPp SUP RE QUEST AREA errq 9 9.d2Yy ear v ! k>. ana °a+q a �n 0. 9bA C rr.It c= It SS.y qy,6, awv� d iorc >d toeng_ 5.mi W Ww. of Aer ..n,;1. a.e .vxrea n t�rx. lover. ra zr lr ays y rr., .r a..b ramctd r rs,a.,. I 3F. aay. Yvee wN y v .. ar w a l9car- r>a 5 �. w na>I � Era - N Y S C' ! x aaA 0.0Y'755 our t aeyq one Pam a..ar epa re oa rpa laa.W vl +lr 8aawoet carom N era [at F ' c'^^9 r Grl +pnv r .s. al Pgien.ry •+vrv9 I.>berr ,dCE AaeVi atgrrSY CerL ^!^^C :-.d Ems. tiler 9r .q., a i.19n>r r ys rp I.r, voxt -, N'E Saaq L a • fart do Each yN .q eve rw � It a �x>n9 e w i a ia n 7xEri[: o rao�r ao.pa rw b m. .>. r ! carrcr, InEn[E SpH.h 80're'1 ®• Eet,, q sUfrNr s•r MOa br, to a acn re} t !ar cores •wEnEE %sJt W 950• mgt. a &r W >a Od I >N b m rran red Ir srrw EfsE 99'.Y 0 vw frsr. 0al" Inr PupE OE BECaOanC ores �s^+w r.5V0 am,are I... u o7y5 a>Iyr G r = q Wrought- imngele /// r2•caiPNrr G z � Wes 9lyra � o a 0 `o W � I Mx..e.5a' a W Proposed O CF T i le Equpm"t Cehirrel r, AD sueening It 6rlck ana sPFHaMe 8'Caro WWa black Yo ma" 6,t B spkf— ewrx p O G bfnppigaiytir,a aclgpl n n erc�a�. Ekr4S Eit4 - 'EL Prnpaied equlpmsm wbinel PRO POSED MONOPOLE ELEV ATION NOT TO sCALE r = q Wrought- imngele /// r2•caiPNrr LocD* Wes 9lyra .Rare...,.. n� I Mx..e.5a' A Proposed T i le Equpm"t Cehirrel a-lad edid AD vertu ar �ppn>sIV �a.� cwFaxiu ccacnc veil ak 3t5C5a!EY N 9 ry 5ff]0.M - . AM4N8 , avry a � rRC � M•w i w lltr tr ea��wl�rr�a r �iwr i. w m. any �. v.�. mot.. ... v,«.....•« � r w i 7T RUeh�Awnt I I AioF epol9 Wrought- imngele /// r2•caiPNrr �{ FKryNlaeVlsmk Wes 9lyra /R 1 Y I Mx..e.5a' Proposed T i le Equpm"t Cehirrel a-lad edid AD sueening It 6rlck ana sPFHaMe black Yo ma" ea,sling mhool del nn romwrn,.Yao.,r, buik&g Ekr4S Eit4 V- 1 0 SCALE: 1'. b M3p0am oe rq w. wnonl>Iw M ea> eauca ResarvKpl fktlny,ce, u �raa0rs' t` s� v r'- SITE PLAN SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR TELECOMMUMCATION TOWER LOT 7R, BLOCK CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL ADDIT10N 3D1 S. PEYTONVILLEAVE- SOUTH LAKE, TEXAS 76092 APIP€1CANT- ZONE $Y$TFIdS ­ I OM KANDiEY ORI'VE SIYITE A , LVT. TX 75200 12 o ow"ER: CARROLL IHD€PENDENT sCHDe7LOISTRYCr 3051 DOVEROAD GW W IPME. Tx 15351 (857)949$8$0 M4 F Case No. Attachment G ZA04 -090 Page 6 ZONE SYSTEMS INC 1620 HANDLEY, SUITE A, DALLAS, TEXAS 75208 February 10, 2005 Southlake City Planning and Zoning Commission 1400 Main Street Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: ZA04 -090 Specific Use Permit Verizon Wireless Carroll High School Dear Chair and Commissioners: We have investigated three items since the last hearing on this SUP request. The first item is the antenna structure itself. We have changed our antenna style to a flagpole style structure. We have used this type of pole in a number of other locations. They are seen as a flag pole or as a simple pole with no outward attachments. Most people do not notice them or do not recognize them as mobile telephone antenna structures. The flag pole type structure will be a light brown color to match the color of the school buildings. Flag pole type antenna structures throughout the area are white in color and tend to be rather bright on a sunny day. The light brown color will make the pole less obvious. The second item for investigation was the location of the pole on the school property. The objective of this mobile telephone cell site is to server the residential areas to the south and east of this property. In order to do that the antennas need to be as far southeast as possible. The antenna site is generally in the center of the school campus in order to be away from homes east and south of the campus. Moving the antenna farther north will impair the service that is to be provided to the south and east by the antenna. The antenna will have the least visible impact to all sides of the school by its location in the center of the campus. We wish to maintain the current location in order for the antennas to function efficiently. The third item of investigation is the review of alternative structures. We have located all structures that are anywhere near to this site. There are two. The two structures are shown on the attached maps. They are both monopoles maintained by other cellular companies. They are identified as Greenbriar and Bear Creek on the maps. They are located near Davis Boulevard. They are immediately north of a site shown as Indian Knoll that contains Verizon Wireless' nearest antenna facility to the southwest of Carroll High School. These two sites are too close to the Indian Knoll site to be used as an alternative to the proposed site at Carroll High School. The propagation analysis map clearly shows that the two sites already have good coverage. The location of antennas on either of these sites would interfere with the Indian Knoll site and not provide the needed coverage to the east. There are two attached maps. Each provides locations of all Verizon sites that now serve this part of the city. One map is a road map and one is the propagation or coverage map providing the radio coverage of the existing sites that serve this area. Case No. ZA04 -090 Attachment G Page 7 Please call me if you have any questions and I will answer them or get the answer if I do not know the answer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Peter Kavanagh Case No. ZA04 -090 Attachment G Page 8