Loading...
Item 7GCity of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT October 11, 2006 CASE NO ZA06 -129 P ROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept Plan for 2005 N. White Chapel Boulevard REQUEST: On behalf of Angela Carter, Cadence Custom Homes is requesting approval of a zoning change and concept plan from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-IN' Single Family Residential District on property located at 2005 N. White Chapel Boulevard and being approximately 1.82 acres. No changes have been made since the first reading at City Council. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider second reading of zoning change and concept plan approval ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (D) Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated September 15, 2006 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map (F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses (G) Ordinance No. 480 -506 (H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (748 -8067) Dennis Killough (748 -8072) Case No. ZA 06 -129 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: APPLICANT: PROPERTY SITUATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION LAND USE CATEGORY CURRENT ZONING REQUESTED ZONING HISTORY: TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Case No. ZA 06 -129 Angela Carter Cadence Custom Homes 2005 N. White Chapel Boulevard Tract 1C, situated in the Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300 Low Density Residential "AG" Agricultural District "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District There is no development history on this property. Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends N. White Chapel Boulevard to be a 4 -lane, divided arterial roadway with 88 feet of right -of -way. Adequate right - of -way is shown to be dedicated on the plan. Existin- Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed lot has direct access onto N. White Chapel Boulevard. N. White Chapel Boulevard is currently a 2 -lane, undivided roadway. The capacity of the existing roadway is approximately 8,400 vehicle trips per day. Under this condition, the roadway would be considered to operate under a level of service `D'. Completion of this development will add 10 vehicle trips per day to this section of N. White Chapel Boulevard. This development is not expected to warrant expansion of the existing roadway network. May, 2006 traffic counts on N. White Chapel Blvd (between Dove St and S.H. 114 24hr North Bound (NB) (2,043) South Bound (SB) (2,394) NB Peale A.M. (217) 7:45 - 8:45 a.m. Peale P.M. (198) 3:15 - 4:15 p.m. SB Peak A.M. (222) 7:30 - 8:30 a.m. Peak P.M. (297) 6:15 - 7:15 p.m. Attachment A Page 1 Traffic Ini»act PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN: *Vehicle Trips Per Day "The The AM /PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on N. White Chapel Blvd. Use 9 Lots Vtpd* AM- AM- PM- PM- IN OUT IN OUT Number of Single- Family 1 10 0 1 1 0 Residential Lots The Southlake Pathways Master Plan recommends an 8 -foot multi -use trail along the west side of N. White Chapel Boulevard. No sidewalks or trails are recommended adjacent to this property. WATER & SEWER: There is an existing 12" water line at the northwest corner of the property. The water line shall be extended to the south property line of this lot for future connection. Public sanitary sewer is not currently available to this site. The nearest public sanitary sewer line is approximately 300 LF to the north at the entrance to the Brentwood Subdivision. Extension of the sanitary sewer shall be to the south property line for future connection. TREE PRESERVATION: The applicant submitted a Tree Conservation Plan showing four (4) existing trees which lie within the building pad. These trees could be preserved depending upon final home design. The plan presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission showed six (6) trees within the building pad. The plan was revised relocating the building pad approximately 10 feet west which allowed for preservation of the existing 12" and 16" oak trees. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: Drainage from this site is to the north through the existing adjacent subdivision. SOUTHLAKE 2025: Consolidated Land Use Plan Recommendations The proposal is consistent with the land use designation, which is Low Density Residential. Environmental Resource Protection Recommendations The northeast corner of the site is designated as open space /tree cover to be preserved on the Environmental Resource Protection Map: Case No. Attachment A ZA 06 -129 Page 2 The applicant's Tree Preservation Plan is consistent with the ERP Map. The trees in the northeast corner of the site will be preserved, as well as some trees on the southeast corner of the site. Southlake Pathways Plan Recommendations A sidewalk along White Chapel Boulevard may be beneficial on this property due to the expected future development of Aventerra to the south and due to the potential to provide a connection from S.H. 114 to neighborhoods to the north (Brentwood, Estes Park, etc.) and Dove Road. However, Southlake Pathways only recommends a trail on the west side of White Chapel Boulevard. P &Z ACTION: September 21, 2006; Approved (6 -0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated September 15, 2006; noting the applicant has agreed to move the building to the west to save the 12 inch oak tree to the east as identified on the tree preservation plan. COUNCIL ACTION: October 3, 2006; First reading approved (6 -0) on consent. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated September 15, 2006. The plan was revised in accordance with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The building pad was moved approximately 10 feet west allowing preservation of the existing 12" and 16" oak trees located east of the pad. M \Community Development \MEMO \2006cases \06- 129ZCP.doc Case No. ZA 06 -129 Attachment A Page 3 Vicinity Map 2005 N. White Chapel Blvd 1000 3 1333 2333 3330 Feet Is Case No. ZA 06 -129 Attachment B Page 1 o � � N • 0 .'U A b � C1Q � C9 I i �jj p a m I w 2 p V II IhIITY M AF^ lo� � 1 { /� � `� }J i � e6'DAK LO'OPK ® ® ®12'PAfC &10'HACK. 6'tlAN WE , A D2 AK l p24'QAK �16 C / t m, ®L6•tlAK 631 "t 4�� I � � 4 � l ®36 K ®2a' AK A 12'tlA y' T 2 y LOT G Bk2'OAK e t L'K 1 726 ACRES F IICEDAR ®20 "tlAK F F i $ 16'tlPKa 9 ®L --� g PROPD5E0 BUILDING' 62- 2 AK L a X CAK 12'C1AK S 6 r C 24 TAK 6TW •Ha K, I e241SA ®LS OAK q M24'OAK , 930 OAK �� Y ®24'OAK f�� ®12'HACK B16 ' p20'QAK r� ���- --w. -- �� �.—. L _ ��-. �—»—.+-- ..— ,�— ..--- •�— ,.�-- ;�- �,,:r —.� m — „-- �, —��—. f ���_ — — _ — \ I I I Wi t NOTE: E7t15TING TREE LOCATI0w5 PROviOPD BY LDYD n L3RAN50M 9LIRVEYOR5, INC 51TC PLAN DRAWING DATED 8.31 -OG REC'D SEP 2 G 2006 TREE PRESEKVATION PLAN t � °.Z�� ° NORTH Pr mo :ed phc S'le MAVed gppro %nw�Iy 2D' wesl - 0 2 t -90vz — - OON v I ON d0z.- )VOIJIUaV OOP 'OA' 9WVAJHJ *11 ATIXWV a 107 offix oils I "d =M=— U 1 = 1 = 1 1 , 11"YON. , ----- - --- - ------- 2�0��e 1 .1 1 113 .1.3. 01 Liq it Too I —IMMINIT.1% To =XM=- -V.—ns n 3 — 1, ----- - ----- I ail xz. ----------------------------- --------------------- a IF' ILI C', ------------------- -V.—ns n 3 — 1, ----- - ----- I ail xz. ----------------------------- --------------------- a IF' ILI C', y: •c jLYfj:y::iw_j:,4: Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 DATE: 9/1 DATE PLAN RECEIVED: 8/14/ 2006 TYPE OF PLAN: Concept Plan TITLE OF PLAN: Concept Plan for SF -lA Zoning, Tract 1C L.H. Chivers, propose Lot 2, Larkin H. Chivers No. 300 Addition The following is a summary of Concept Plan criteria required by the City of Southlake. Please refer to Zoning Ordinance No. 480, amendments, and other ordinances, maps and codes that may pertain to this submittal. Provide a 10' type B bufferyard along the frontage of N. White Chapel Boulevard. It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. All development must comply with the City's Drainage Ordiance No. 605 as amended. Case No. ZA 06 -129 Attachment D Page 1 Case No. 06 -129 Review No. Two Dated: September 15, 2006 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: 2005 N. White Chapel Blvd. Zoning Change- Concept Plan) Comments due to the Planning Department: September 14, 2006 Contact: Keith Martin Phone: (817) 748 -8229 Fax: (817) 481 -5713 The following comments are based on the review ofplans received on September 9, 2006 . Comments designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: The applicant submitted a Tree Conservation Plan showing four (4) existing trees which lie within the building pad. These trees could be preserved depending upon final home design. The plan presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission showed six (6) trees within the building pad. The plan was revised relocating the building pad approximately 10 feet west which allowed for preservation of the existing 12" and 16" oak trees. Case No. ZA 06 -129 Attachment D Page 2 Case No. ZA06 -129 Review No. 2 Dated: 9/15/06 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Larkin H. Chivers No. 300 Addition (2005 N. White Chapel Blvd.) -- Zoning Change & Concept Plan Contact: Cheryl Taylor, Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748 -8100 Fax: (817) 748 -8077 Email: ctayloroci.southlake.tx.us The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 9/12/2006. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. GENERAL COMMENTS: * The curb return radius for the proposed driveways must be 30' minimum. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. WATER COMMENTS: 1. There is an existing 12" water line at the northwest corner of the property. The water line shall be extended to the south property line of this lot for future connection. * The minimum size for water lines is 8 ". * Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or ROW. * The water meters must be located in an easement or right -of -way. SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: 1. Public sanitary sewer is not currently available to this site. The nearest public sanitary sewer line is approximately 300 LF to the north at the entrance to the Brentwood Subdivision. Extension of the sanitary sewer shall be to the south property line for future connection. * The minimum size for sanitary sewer lines is 8 ". * All sanitary sewer service lines must connect to a public sanitary system line that is built to City standards. * The proposed sewer line must be located in the parkway - not under pavement, except for crossings. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: * Proposed driveway culverts must be sized by an engineer and submitted for approval to the City Engineer. * The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748 -8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of construction plans. *= Denotes informational comment. Case No. Attachment D ZA 06 -129 Page 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA06 -129 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 09/15/06 Project: Lot 2, Larkin H. Chivers No. 300 Addition Application Type: Zoning Change & Concept Plan Contact: Jenny Crosby Phone: (817) 748 -8195 Email: jcrosby @ci.southlalce.tx.us Consolidated Land Use Plan Recommendations The proposal is consistent with the land use designation, which is Low Density Residential. Environmental Resource Protection Recommendations The northeast corner of the site is designated as open space /tree cover to be preserved on the Environmental Resource Protection Map: The applicant's Tree Preservation Plan is consistent with the ERP Map. The trees in the northeast corner of the site will be preserved, as well as some trees on the southeast corner of the site. Southlake Pathways Plan Recommendations A sidewalk along White Chapel Boulevard may be beneficial on this property due to the expected future development of Aventerra to the south and due to the potential to provide a connection from S.H. 114 to neighborhoods to the north (Brentwood, Estes Park, etc.) and Dove Road. However, Southlake Pathways only recommends a trail on the west side of White Chapel Boulevard. Case No. ZA 06 -129 Attachment D Page 4 --Z Q O LEGEND EXISTING TREE COVER EXISTING 100 -YEAR FLOOD PLAIN TREE COVERIOPEN SPACE TO BE PRESERVED WHERE APPROPRIATE EXISTING CREEKS & WATER BODIES The applicant's Tree Preservation Plan is consistent with the ERP Map. The trees in the northeast corner of the site will be preserved, as well as some trees on the southeast corner of the site. Southlake Pathways Plan Recommendations A sidewalk along White Chapel Boulevard may be beneficial on this property due to the expected future development of Aventerra to the south and due to the potential to provide a connection from S.H. 114 to neighborhoods to the north (Brentwood, Estes Park, etc.) and Dove Road. However, Southlake Pathways only recommends a trail on the west side of White Chapel Boulevard. Case No. ZA 06 -129 Attachment D Page 4 Surrounding Property Owners 2005 N. White Chapel Blvd 1 2 $ 4 9 P Owner I Zoning I Land Use I Acreage 1. Saw Partners LP SF -30 Low Density Residential 2. Saw Partners LP SF -30 Low Density Residential Brentwood 3. Saw Partners LP SF -30 Low Density Residential Total = 8.65 4. Saw Partners LP SF -30 Low Density Residential 5. Thrasher, Imogene AG Mixed Use 1.0 6. Thrasher, Wesley & Terri AG Mixed Use 1.78 7. Westerra Southlake LP NR -PUD Mixed Use 35 8. Carter, Angela AG Mixed Use 1.82 9. Westerra Southlake LP S -P -2 Mixed Use 55.7 10. Shivers Family Partnership Ltd AG Mixed Use 38.376 Case No. ZA 06 -129 Attachment E Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses 2005 N. White Chapel Blvd Notices Sent: Seven (7) Responses Received: None (0) Case No. ZA 06 -129 Attachment F Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480 -506 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1C, SITUATED IN THE LARKIN H. CHIVERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 300, BEING APPROXIMATELY 1.82 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM " AG " AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "SF -IA" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT `B ", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan, and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, Case No. ZA06 -129 Attachment G Page 1 WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off- street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off - street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over - crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning Case No. Attachment G ZA06 -129 Page 2 lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over - crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tract 1C, situated in the Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, being approximately 1. 82 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF- IA" Single Family Residential District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit `B ". SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Case No. ZA06 -129 Attachment G Page 3 SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over - crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. Case No. Attachment G ZA06 -129 Page 4 That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by Case No. ZA06 -129 Attachment G Page 5 law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 3r day of October, 2006. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2006. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. ZA06 -129 Attachment G Page 6 EXHIBIT "A" Being Tract 1C, situated in the Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, being approximately 1.82 acres. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS WE. ANGELA MICHELLE BUSTER CARTER AND SHERADON CARTER ARE THE SOLE OWNERS OF A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE LARKIN H_ CHIMERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 300, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO DEED RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERKS N0, 02DG161476. DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A I' BOLT FOUND IN THE EAST LINE OF N_ WHITE CHAPEL BOULEVARD FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT BEING DESCRIBEO. SAID POINT BY DEED SEM LOCATED 462.5 VARAS SOUTH AND 9 VARAS EAST FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE LARKIN H, CHIVER'S SURVEY, SAID POINT BEwG LOCATED 23.05 FEET SOUTH 69 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 1, BRENTWOOD ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A. SLIDE 10804, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST 23.05 FEET TO A CAPPED IRON PIN (H&1) FOUND FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9, BLOCK 1, BRENTWOOD ADDITION AND CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 1, BRENTWOOD ADDITION N ALL 440.85 FEET TO A I' BOLT FOUND FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT BEING DESCRIBED, SAID POINT BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7, SAID BLOCK 1, BRENTWOOD ADDITION AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED N DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 12615. PAGE 339. DEED RECORDS, 7ARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 21 W AMS 46 SECONDS WEST 180.04 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 12615. PAGE 339 TO A 1/2' IRON PN FOUND FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT BEING DESCRIBED, SAO POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK A, THRASHER ADDMON. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLA KE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED N VOLUME 366 -202, PACE 73, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST 440.27 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK A. THRASHER ADOInON TO A 1/2' IRON PIN FOUND IN THE EAST LINE OF SAID N. WHITE CWIPEL BOULEVARD FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Or TRACT BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST 180.40 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAO N. WHITE CHAPEL BOULEVARD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 1,621 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS Case No. ZA06 -129 Attachment G Page 7 L' 00 -- sart ,oz �a {t ; xa�ddb PaAGW l4i`IGN AI• �Z o Nd7I NOUVANgG3�IJ 39'�Il 9OR 9 � d3S 0,038 90 1 E•8 001tl09NLMV2C NVII 0115 �NI QIOA�AIOG N€OSITYN9 OAOI {g 04QIACW SNOliVDM AAI 9N11909 '310N W I W I� W 3 1 Ii w -111 FA1 a U CC C� O N �o U N