Item 7MCity of Southlake
Department of Planning
STAFF REPORT
September 13, 2006
CASE NO: ZA06 -107
P ROJECT: Site Plan for Watermere at Southlake (formerly Watermark at Southlake)
REQUEST: Southlake Watermark, LP is requesting approval of a Site Plan under the approved "S-
P-2" Generalized Site Plan District zoning and concept plan for senior adult living,
personnel care and nursing complex. The site plan includes the full build -out of all the
parks, community /amenity centers, independent living, personnel care and nursing units
approved with zoning change and concept plan. The number of living units and floor
areas are as follows:
Unit Type
Number of Units
Floor Area - S . Ft.
Cottage (Independent Living)
83
190,000
Condominium (Independent Living)
152
345,000
Personal /Nursing- Memory Care
60/40
81,990
Community Center
2 Guest Units
40,000
Total
337
656,990
Land Area Tabulations are as follows
Gross Land Area —
35.56 Acres
Net Land Area —
33.50 Acres
Gross Density —
9.5 du /Ac.
Net Density —
10.1 du /Ac.
Open Space —
16.77 Acres /50% of Net Area
The zoning and concept plan for this site were approved by City Council on January 16,
2006. It is staff's opinion that the elevations submitted are consistent with the overall
approved zoning and concept plan (see Attachment `C', pages 1 — 5).
Case No.
ZA06 -107
ACTION NEEDED
ATTACHMENTS
STAFF CONTACT
1) Conduct Public Hearing
2) Consider Site Plan Approval
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information (Click Links Below)
Site Plan & Elevations
Landscape Plans
(D) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated September 1, 2006.
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(G) Full Size Plans (for Conumi ion and Council Membersv Unly)
Ken Baker (748 -8067)
Dennis Killough (748 -8072)
Case No.
ZA06 -107
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNERS: Pinnacle Lifestyles Inc., (Joyce Owen) and Ruby Slayton
APPLICANT: Southlake Watermark, LP
PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located at 2809 W. Southlake Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 6A01, 61304, 4F, 4G, 4G01, 4F01, 5A0113, a portion of Tracts 6A, and
6A02, J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District.
REQUESTED ZONING: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District.
HISTORY: -City Council approved a zoning and concept plan on July 7, 1998.
-A site plan was approved for the project on November 17, 1998.
-A final plat was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 17,
1999.
-A zoning amendment and concept plan modifying the S -P -2 zoning was
approved in June of 2002.
-City Council approved a zoning change and concept plan for "Watermark at
Southlake" (Case ZA05 -124) and its associated a Preliminary Plat (Case ZA05-
144) on January 17, 2006.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Blvd to have 130' of
right -of -way. Adequate right -of -way exists for this road.
Proposed Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed site will have three (3) access drives directly onto both sides of
Owenwood Drive, a proposed collector street along the west portion ofthe site
with 60' of right -of -way, which will intersect Southlake Blvd across from West
Jellico Circle. The street will eventually extend south to connect to Union
Church Road.
Existinz Area Road Network and Conditions
West Southlake Boulevard is a five lane, undivided thoroughfare with a
continuous, two -way, center left turn lane. The roadway is currently being
Case No. Attachment A
ZA06 -107 Page 1
widened to a seven lane roadway.
May, 2005 traffic counts on F.M. 1709 (between FM 1938 (Davis Blvd)
& Pearson Lane): Table #1
24hr
West Bound (WB) (16,105)
East Bound (EB) (16,634)
WB
Peak A.M. (874) 10 — 11 a.m.
Peak P.M. (1,704) 4 — 5 p.m.
EB
Peak A.M. (1,743) 6 — 7 a.m.
Peak P.M. (1,106) 4 — 5 p.m.
Traffic Impact
Use
#
Units
Vtpd*
AM-
IN
AM-
OUT
PM-
IN
PM-
OUT
Cottages
85
296
3
2
3
5
Condominiums
152
529
4
4
14
10
Personal Care/Nursing
90
215
3
2
9
7
Totals
337
1,040
10
8
26
22
*Vehicle Trips Per Day
*The AN"M times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times
on Southlake Boulevard.
Southlake Boulevard, between FM 1938 (Davis Blvd) and Pearson Lane,
carries approximately 32,739 vehicles with the peak traffic times occurring
between 6 a.m. and 7 a.m. in the morning and between 4 p.m. and 5 p.m. in the
afternoon. According to Trip Generation, 6 Edition, the site will generate
approximately 21 vehicle trips during the A.M. rush hour and approximately 58
vehicle trips during the P.M. rush hour.
WATER & SEWER: The site will connect water services to an existing 12" water line along the
south side of Southlake Boulevard. A 10" sewer line extension of
approximately 3300 feet is proposed from the southern property line to the
south side of Union Church and over to an existing 18" sewer line
approximately 600 feet from Davis Blvd.
DRAINAGE: The development drains to the southeast through a series of detention ponds
within the site. The outfall of the southernmost detention pond will drain to the
existing culverts in Union Church Road.
P &Z ACTION: September 7, 2006; Approved (7 -0) subject to review; clarifying that the
applicant will provide sanitary sewer to church property to the west.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated September 1, 2006.
N: \Community Development \MEMO \2006cases \06- 107SP.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA06 -107 Page 2
Vicinity Map
Watermere at Southlake
MEN
■111 � ��
MEN
NMI
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
N
Case No.
ZA06 -107
E
Attachment B
Page 1
o
TR. 4D
TR. 6AIA
TR. 6B
�261111FFA1 Y.4111]
--------------
7R. 7 - M. 4L
It I A-RD7
4P U13rnxvvm � 1 � . -. I .�. , �,.
1, ^ UiI IYY
V.
TR. 41A' , T4 1 4M
U", F NM mf I111FT V 1)
-- -- — — — — --- - - - - -- T
TR.
3.
Le°�qA 2027
TR. 4GI
x
2q2bA
j
TI 4-.11
>
0
0 0
Praiqo� - L ARW
- 7
C
A�
.w.,..wm� Sy
CENILK
MUOPEL'
MAM In
WATERMARK AT sou
PRITAAIDBY
k YA"m
TR, 5AI
'a
GTR
Ko�
41wl—
momT—
Z A05 - 124
I IM ro o 5 1
DDUNDDIITON
>
ME AmiSE
O
QWNLR.
Tit. 5A2
BUDINGFODTPRUff
JAMSCAPE ARRAS
,Vml wn=ff
111. 6A.4 I
ins�?t9B3
MUOPEL'
MAM In
WATERMARK AT sou
PRITAAIDBY
CONCEPT PLAN
GTR
Ko�
41wl—
momT—
Z A05 - 124
I IM ro o 5 1
� (n
o
~' o
o .
I
y
A
CfQ �
C9
ALL TRIM $. FASCIA
SOFFIT MATERIAL 15
CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL
APFROX
iMATE AL % �
BRICK /C5TONE = 30
STUCCO 3 0
GEM. SIDINGS �O
ALL TRIM & FASCIA
SOFFIT MATERNAL IS
CEMENT :T:OU5 MATERIAL
MEM OKY CARE ELEVATION
SCALE : 3/32 " =1' -0"
A551S I -1 D LI VING NDL LLLVATION
�� - SCALE : 3i32 " =k -O"
4
F
X
4
O
b
b
O
^ O
l
l J
u �
l J
r �7'
l J
H
O
N 11
o
1-T
MATERIAL o
(BRICK /STONE - 50
'(STU C O
ICEM. SIDING = 10
ALL - RIM 21 FASCIA
5OFr:T MATERIAL 15
OF
:NTITIOUS MATERIAL
4PPROY:
MATE IAL ie
E5RICK/STONE 40
0
G E M. S I D ING so
)Il 3
STUCCO 0
M SIDING— 30
ALL TRIM a FASCIA
SOFFIT MATERIAL IS
CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL
SOFFIT MATERIAL 15
CEMENTITIOU5 MATERIAL
GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIV
PURPOSES ONLY :
. YEAR TREATED CE7AR
---------- ----------
--- ------- -------
-------------
30 Y
giffit
4
x
TYr. COTFA6E,51DE, ELEVATION
a
--------------------
-----------
t. (n
TG
,',TYF.CO TA 3E.-ENDTILVATION
SCALE : 3/32'=l'-0`
,-TYF. COTTAGE.-KLAK F-LEVATION
4 / )
SCALE : 3/321=11_0•
"T, AU
-----------------
ALL TRIM B FASCIA
---
SOFFIT MATERIAL 15
CEMENTITIOU5 MATERIAL
GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIV
PURPOSES ONLY :
. YEAR TREATED CE7AR
---------- ----------
--- ------- -------
-------------
30 Y
giffit
4
x
TYr. COTFA6E,51DE, ELEVATION
a
--------------------
-----------
t. (n
TG
,',TYF.CO TA 3E.-ENDTILVATION
SCALE : 3/32'=l'-0`
,-TYF. COTTAGE.-KLAK F-LEVATION
4 / )
SCALE : 3/321=11_0•
o
~' o
o .
I
A
APPROX:
MATE IA °
BRICK /GSTONE= K
STUCCO - 50
CE`1. SIDI = 10
ALL TRIM ff FASCIA
5OFFI7 MATERIAL IS
CEMENTITIOUS MATE
APPROX:
MAi =RIAL %
'IBRICK /C 5'ONE = 301
STUCCO 60
jCEM 5IDING = 10
ALL TRIM $ FASCIA
SOFFIT MATERIAL IS
CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL
APPROX'
MATERIAL %
BRICK /C STONE = 4C
5TUCCO 50
_C EM. 5I0ING = i0
ALL TRIM fi FASCIA
SOFFIT MA -ERIAL :5.
CEMENTITIOUE MATEI
GIVEN FOR II I [ATRATIVP_
P LRP05ES 04LY
(�_ - �LU XUKYKESIDENTIAL CONDOS - TYP.COUKTYAKD ELEVATION
- SCALE :1116 " =I' -O"
I
Q
F
w
Y
Q
= 1
7
I ION
.�. l 1
lE- j _.UXUKY RESIDEN COND05 -TYP- STREET ELEVATION
SCALE I/16 " =1' -0'
;�� LUX U RY}ZF_SIDENTIALCON DO S- TYP.SIDE ELEVATI
o
~' o
o .
0
1"r
1"r
n
I�
V �
AT
`+.AT RSAL 9e
6R17-< /C.STONE = 10
stucco Is
C =!'L.. SONG = 15
A-- TRIM � FASCIA
SOFFIT MATERIAL 15
CEMENTITIO,J3 MATERIA-
FOOF � VEV.CF
\
APPROY:
H3R' < /C STCN- = AO
\
STUCCO '':O
GEM- 5IDING = 20
ALL `RIM s FASCIA \
50FF:7 HATER ?A_ ?C
CFM�NT[ - IONS MAT -R[AL
------------------------------ _ __ \_-------
GIV -N FOR Ii..LU "TRATIVE
°lIR °OSES O:SLY
=INiB \ —T E -.11
( �)CO M M UNITY C UMHOUSE SIDE ELEVATION
-- -- - -
i
I<
Q
' W
w
Y
z
O
oil
�A l 1
-
MMUNFFY E -F ELEVAT
[`0)11:19I-10 iIWITA - 6 1a10Fl:ra: »910711.9 * 6 51
Case No.: ZA06 -107 Review No.: One
Date of Review: 7/10/06
Project Name: Site Plan — Watermere Southlake
Dear Mr. Killough,
Below are the responses to your comments for the Site Plan Review Summary on
Watermere at Southlake. Please feel free to contact us should you have any additional
questions or comments.
1. Comment: Show all new (proposed) lot boundaries with lot/block, (easements if
they have a significant impact on site and structu8re location),
boundary bearings and distances. Insure all dimensions and
easements match the final plat. Eliminate the old tract boundaries.
Label Lot 1, Block 1, Slayton Addition.
Response: We will revise plans to reflect all lot boundaries with lot and block
titles.
Z. Comment: Show sad label a minimum 26 foot the Common Access Easement
stubbed into the west boundary and centered over the driveway.
Extend the pavement to the west boundary and insure that grades
provide accessibility to the adjoining property.
Response: We will revise plans to reflect and label of 26 foot minimum common
access easement stubbed into the West boundary and centered over
the driveway.
3. Comment: Coordinate and show the trail connection to the church property to
the east and connections to the south. Show a pedestrian access
8251 Bedford - Euless Road Suite 250 • North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Ph: 817.519.0584 Fx: 817.514.0694 I www.GTFdesign.com
Case No.
ZA06 -107
Attachment C
Page 6
Galier I Tolson 1 French
Architecture
Planning
Project M; nagem --
[`0)11:19I-10 iIWITA - 6 1a10Fl:ra: »910711.9 * 6 51
Case No.: ZA06 -107 Review No.: One
Date of Review: 7/10/06
Project Name: Site Plan — Watermere Southlake
Dear Mr. Killough,
Below are the responses to your comments for the Site Plan Review Summary on
Watermere at Southlake. Please feel free to contact us should you have any additional
questions or comments.
1. Comment: Show all new (proposed) lot boundaries with lot/block, (easements if
they have a significant impact on site and structu8re location),
boundary bearings and distances. Insure all dimensions and
easements match the final plat. Eliminate the old tract boundaries.
Label Lot 1, Block 1, Slayton Addition.
Response: We will revise plans to reflect all lot boundaries with lot and block
titles.
Z. Comment: Show sad label a minimum 26 foot the Common Access Easement
stubbed into the west boundary and centered over the driveway.
Extend the pavement to the west boundary and insure that grades
provide accessibility to the adjoining property.
Response: We will revise plans to reflect and label of 26 foot minimum common
access easement stubbed into the West boundary and centered over
the driveway.
3. Comment: Coordinate and show the trail connection to the church property to
the east and connections to the south. Show a pedestrian access
8251 Bedford - Euless Road Suite 250 • North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Ph: 817.519.0584 Fx: 817.514.0694 I www.GTFdesign.com
Case No.
ZA06 -107
Attachment C
Page 6
Galier I Tolson I French
Architecture
Planning
Project Management
easement of adequate width to cover the trail where the trail may
cross private property.
Response: We will revise plans to show the trail connection to the church
property to the East.
4. Comment: Insure that the number of units on the plan and sit data summary
are correct. The plan shows 235 condo/cottage units instead of 237.
Building i appears to have 7 instead of 8 and Building three has 5
instead of 3 as labeled. The concept plan and data summary
anticipated 8 and 6 respectively.
Response: Plans were mislabeled; we will revise plans to reflect the correct
number of units of 237.
5. Comment: Clearly label and identify the public parks and intended
improvements to be made as part of this project.
Response: We will revise plans to show public parks and intended
improvements to be made.
6. Comment: Proposed finished grade of the site shown to contour intervals not
exceeding two (2) feet. Spot elevations must be shown at all critical
points, including but not limited to edges of pavement, curb returns,
building corners, drainage paths, etc. Include directional flow arrows
in all flow lines, and all existing drainage structures labeled with size,
type flow line elevation. Also show center line of water courses and
existing drainage easements.
Response: Civil plans show and reflect proposed finish grades and spot
elevations.
7. Comment: For resubmission for the public approval process, consolidate the
elevations and landscape plans in as few sheets as possible.
Response: We will try to consolidate the elevation sheets in as few sheets as
possible.
8251 Bedford- Euless Read Suite 250 • North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Ph: 827.514.0584 Fx: 817.514.0694 I www.GTFdesEgn.rom
Case No.
ZA06 -107
Attachment C
Page 7
8. Comment: Remove the parking space from the west buffer yard.
Response: We will revise plans to show the parking space from the West Buffer
ya rd.
Minor alterations of materials on elevations will be made to the "Mon - Visible"
elevations IE, rear & side due to project budget projections, however, will
conform to the Concept Renderings and overall style.
Per meeting held with Parks Department on Wednesday, July 26 The team
agreed on minor revisions of Site Plan and will be updated for City Council
submission.
Sincerely,
g u MeM4. e
Bryan McMurtre
Project Manager
RBM Ja rf
8251 Bedford- Euless Road Suite 250 • North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Ph: 817.514.0584 Fx: 817.514.0694 I www.GTFdesign.com
Case No.
ZA06 -107
Attachment C
Page 8
Galier I Tolson I French
ArChlterture
Planning
Project Management
8. Comment: Remove the parking space from the west buffer yard.
Response: We will revise plans to show the parking space from the West Buffer
ya rd.
Minor alterations of materials on elevations will be made to the "Mon - Visible"
elevations IE, rear & side due to project budget projections, however, will
conform to the Concept Renderings and overall style.
Per meeting held with Parks Department on Wednesday, July 26 The team
agreed on minor revisions of Site Plan and will be updated for City Council
submission.
Sincerely,
g u MeM4. e
Bryan McMurtre
Project Manager
RBM Ja rf
8251 Bedford- Euless Road Suite 250 • North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Ph: 817.514.0584 Fx: 817.514.0694 I www.GTFdesign.com
Case No.
ZA06 -107
Attachment C
Page 8
July 27, 2006
Mr Dennis Killough
City of Southlake Planning Department
1400 Main Street, Suite 320
Southlake, IX76092
Re: Watermere at Southlake City Comments
City of Southlake, Texas
Dear Mr. Killough:
In response to the City of Southlake, Land Design Partners, Inc will address the
following stipulations for the site plan review summary completed on July 10, 2006. We
propose the following responses:
• the landscape plans submitted on June 26, 2006 were submitted for
"conceptual" purposes only The quantity of plant material will meet the
minimum city requirements
• The entry signage, near FM 1709 will be designed per the Parks
Department's meeting with Bryan McMurtte on July 26, 2006.
• The signar package will be submitted prior to the Council Meeting on
August 15` , 2006.
• Four inch calipet (4 ") Red Oak trees will be added at 20' on- center in the
bufferyatd and land adjacent to the parking lot along the East property line
adjacent to Mr . Weisman's property per the approved Concept Plan
• The landscape plans will be consolidated to minimize the number of plan
sheets
Land Design Partners Inc
3345 Bee Caves Road Suite 100
Austin Texas 78746
Ph 512 327 5900 512 328 1253 Fx
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
Case No. Attachment C
ZA06 -107 Page 9
MT Dennis Killough
July 27, 2006
Page 2
• A trail connection to the church property to the east will be added per the
approved Concept Plan.
• All parking lot landscape islands will contain a minimum of one canopy tree
with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, and ornamental grasses
• AlI bufferyards will be shown and labeled on the plan as shown on the
approved Concept Plan
• the approved bufferyard and interior landscape charts will be shown on the
plans
• A tree Survey Plan will be submitted showing all the existing trees types,
caliper inches, and whether they will be removed or preserved
We appreciate working with you through the submittal process and look forward to your
comments. Upon your review, please call if'you have any questions.
Respectfully submitted,
C
Christopher Joy
Project Manager
C J /kd
Land Design Partners, Inc IN
3345 Bee Caves Road Suite 100 ■ 1 M ■
Austin, Texas 78745
Ph 512 327 5900 512.328 1253 Fx 0 M
L A N D D E S I G N PARTNERS
Case No. Attachment C
ZA06 -107 Page 10
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
Click the links below to view the plans
Site Plan & Elevations
Landscape Plans
Case No. Attachment C
ZA06 -107 Page 11
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA06 -107 Review No.: Two
Project Name: Site Plan — Watermere at Southlake
Date of Review: 9/01/06
APPLICANT:
Southlake Watermark, LP
3110 W. Southlake Blvd, Ste. 120
Southlake, Texas 76092
Phone: (817) 329 -0207
Fax: (817) 329 -6982
ARCHITECT:
Galier, Tolson, French Design Assoc.
Phone: (817) 514 -0584
Fax: (817) 514 -0694
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/21/06 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748 -8069 OR BEN BRYNER AT (817) 748-
8602.
Show sad label a minimum 26 foot the Common Access Easement stubbed into the west boundary
and centered over the driveway. Extend the pavement to the west boundary and insure that grades
provide accessibility to the adjoining property.
2. Coordinate and show the trail connection to the church property to the east and connections to the
south. Show a pedestrian access easement of adequate width to cover the trail where the trail may
cross private property.
Clearly label and identify the public parks and intended improvements to be made as part of this
project.
4. Proposed finished grade of the site shown to contour intervals not exceeding two (2) feet. Spot
elevations must be shown at all critical points, including but not limited to edges of pavement, curb
returns, building corners, drainage paths, etc. Include directional flow arrows in all flow lines, and
all existing drainage structures labeled with size, type and flow line elevation. Also show centerline
of water courses and existing drainage easements.
A preliminary utility plan showing all water, sewer, fire hydrants, drainage systems installation and
connections to existing systems is required.
Although some minor alterations between brick veneer and cultured stone have been made, all
building elevations contain the same general, if not exact mix, of brick, stone, stucco, cedar,
standing seam metal roof and composition roof as approved on the representative design
renderings. Buildings appear to conform to the original approval.
A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans /documents and conditions of
approval is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or before
Case No.
ZA06 -107
Attachment D
Page 1
acceptance of any other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be reviewed
and stamped "approved" by the Planning Department.
All development must comply with the City's Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and detain all post
development run -off.
No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and
building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include
but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact
and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
The applicant should be aware that any plan revisions or supplemental information required for the
next scheduled meeting following a Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council hearing must
be submitted to the City Planning Department no later than 5:OOPM the following Monday. A
minimum of twelve (12) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" reduction is required for any plans. If
not received by the deadline, the application may be tabled to later meeting agenda.
A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No.
ZA06 -107
Attachment D
Page 2
Comprehensive Plan Assessment
Environmental Resource Protection Recommendations
The ERP Plan recommends that critical environmental and natural features be protected and enhanced,
with particular emphasis on trees and floodplains. Further, floodplains, wetlands, and streams should
remain in a natural state with tree buffers around these features. The proposed plan preserves a majority of
the quality trees and water bodies on the site.
Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations
The Mobility Plan recommends improving connectivity throughout the city. The proposed site plan provides
automobile connections to the sites to the south and to the west. The connection to the south provides the
potential for future north -south automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian connectivity from Southlake Blvd. to
Union Church.
Southlake Pathways Plan Recommendations
The Pathways Plan calls for an 8'+ multi -use trail ( 928 in the map below) connecting Southlake Blvd. to
Union Church. The proposed site plan shows the 8' trail through the property along Owenwood Drive.
The Pathways Plan also recommends an 8'+ east -west multi -use trail (464 in the map below) across the
property. This east -west connection is not shown in the proposed site plan but can be accomplished with
development of the properties to the south and east.
- ..- --_ I r r � k t�
The proposed plan also provides a significant internal network of trails in and around the open spaces and
linking the different areas of the site. The sidewalks should also connect to the community center.
Additional Recommendations
Extend the sidewalk on the west side of Owenwood Drive north to Southlake Blvd.
Case No.
ZA06 -107
Attachment D
Page 3
Case No. 06 -107 Review No. _ Dated: September 1, 2006 Number of Pages: 2
Project Name: Watermere of Southlake (Site Plan)
Comments due to the Planning Department: September 1, 2006
Contact: Keith Martin Phone: (817) 748 -8229 Fax: (817) 481 -5713
The following comments are based on the review of plans received on August 21, 2006 . Comments
designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the
Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P &Z
or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above
and make modifications as required by the comment.
BUFFERYARDS:
The bufferyards along the east side of Owenwood Drive are pointed out a 20' Bufferyards but are
labeled as 10' -A Bufferyards.
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
The design of the development seems to preserve most all of the existing trees on the site. The areas
that currently consist of "Quality" trees are located within the north portion of the development
adjacent to West Southlake Blvd, and within the west portion of the development which is proposed to
be Open Space with a drainage channel or detention that is proposed to be made from the existing
pond. It does not look like any proposed development other than a sidewalk or walking path is being
provided within the stand of Post Oaks adjacent to West Southlake Blvd. No grade changes are shown
within the park area on the west side of Owenwood Drive but to construct the drainage channel there
will need to be extensive grading within the critical root zone areas of some of the trees.
All protected trees that must be altered to construct the required and permitted improvements
based on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan are exempted from the tree replacement
and protection requirements of this section. Such improvements may include building pads, required
parking areas, driveways, fire lanes, streets, and required utility and drainage infrastructure that are
required by City ordinances and have been approved by the appropriate boards or officers of the City.
Any protected trees within a building footprint that the approved Tree Conservation Plan
determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements contained in
Section 9.8 of Ordinance 585 -C.
All other areas of the proposed development, including areas in utility easements and areas
designated for cut /fill for any purpose other than required drainage and infrastructure improvements,
shall be subject to both the tree protection and tree replacement requirements of 585 -C.
Case No.
ZA06 -107
Attachment D
Page 4
INTERIOR LANDSCAPE & BUFFERYARD COMMENTS:
Does the plan meet the interior landscape requirements?
The submitted landscape plans do not conform to the landscape requirements as approved with the
previous Concept Plan and the minimum plant material size requirements of the Landscape
Ordinance 544 -A.
• The Concept Plan and submitted Site Plan states that 4" Red Oak trees are to be planted 20' on- center
in bufferyard and land adjacent to the parking along the East property line adjacent to Mr. Weisman
property 469' North and South and 84' East and West for a total of 554'. (No Red Oak trees are
proposed to be planted within any of these areas.)
• All of the proposed shrubs are shown to be 1 gallon in size at the time of the required landscape
installation (The minimum size for shrubs at the time of planting shall be 3 gallon containers. The
Landscape Administrator may approve smaller sized shrubs based on unusual growing
circumstances and /or on a specific design which reflects the overall intent of the Landscape
Ordinance)
Does the plan meet the parking lot landscaping requirements?
1. Please ensure that all parking lot landscape islands are no less than 12' from back -of -curb to bk
of -curb and equal to the length of the parking stalls. All parking lot landscape islands shall contain the
minimum of one (1) canopy tree with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses or
seasonal color.
Case No.
ZA06 -107
Attachment D
Page 5
Surrounding Property Owners
Watermere at Southlake
Owner
Zoning
Land Use
Acreage
1. Hall, Jerry
SF-IA
Low Density Residential
1.176
2. Hall, Jerry
SF-IA
Low Density Residential
1.585
3. Hall, Jerry
3
2
L
1
4. Dallas Ashton Resid Llc
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
0.459
5. Hopkins, David W & Karen K
SF-IA
q �5
IV
0.459
6. Griser, David & Karen
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
0.459
7. Enriquez, Henry
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
0.462
11
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
0.585
9. Mendez, Ltd
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
1.0
18 9
16
17
2 [1
21
19
17
15
22
23
1L
8
7
14
24
25
29
13
28
C
J
27
4
26
24
Owner
Zoning
Land Use
Acreage
1. Hall, Jerry
SF-IA
Low Density Residential
1.176
2. Hall, Jerry
SF-IA
Low Density Residential
1.585
3. Hall, Jerry
SF-IA
Low Density Residential
1.728
4. Dallas Ashton Resid Llc
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
0.459
5. Hopkins, David W & Karen K
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
0.459
6. Griser, David & Karen
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
0.459
7. Enriquez, Henry
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
0.462
8. Mullenix, David W & Raeann
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
0.585
9. Mendez, Ltd
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
1.0
Case No. Attachment E
ZA06 -107 Page 1
10. Goodell, William J
SF-IA
Low Density Residential
1.63
11. Goodell, William J
SF-IA
Low Density Residential
1.79
12. Lee, Jane S or James
AG
Medium Density Residential
5.48
13. Keller Isd
AG
Public / Semi -Public
9.853
14. Keller Isd
AG
Public / Semi - Public
18.706
15. Southlake Watermark Holdings
S -P -2
Medium Density Residential
8.44
16. Southlake Watermark Holdings
S -P -2
Medium Density Residential
1.58
17. Southlake Watermark Holdings
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
7.642
18. Southlake Watermark Holdings
SF-IA
Medium Density Residential
1.224
19. Keller, Nancy L
AG
Medium Density Residential
2.52
20. Horn & Toad Properties
AG
Medium Density Residential
4.025
21. Lakeside Pres Ch Grapevine
CS
Medium Density Residential
7.038
22. Southlake Watermark Holdings
S -P -2
Medium Density Residential
8.18
23. Wiesman, E I
AG
Medium Density Residential
13.482
24. Southlake Watermark Holdings
AG
Medium Density Residential
6.0
25. Southlake Watermark Holdings
S -P -2
Medium Density Residential
2.48
26. Mortazavi, Joseph & Kimiela
AG
Medium Density Residential
3
27. Mortazavi, Joseph & Kimiela
AG
Medium Density Residential
3.082
28. Couch, Bobbie J
AG
Medium Density Residential
4.08
29. Southlake Watermark Holdings
S -P -2
Medium Density Residential
1.92
Case No.
ZA06 -107
Attachment E
Page 2
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Watermere at Southlake
Notices Sent: Seventeen (17)
Responses: None (0)
Case No.
ZA06 -107
Attachment F
Page 1