Loading...
Item 7MCity of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT September 13, 2006 CASE NO: ZA06 -107 P ROJECT: Site Plan for Watermere at Southlake (formerly Watermark at Southlake) REQUEST: Southlake Watermark, LP is requesting approval of a Site Plan under the approved "S- P-2" Generalized Site Plan District zoning and concept plan for senior adult living, personnel care and nursing complex. The site plan includes the full build -out of all the parks, community /amenity centers, independent living, personnel care and nursing units approved with zoning change and concept plan. The number of living units and floor areas are as follows: Unit Type Number of Units Floor Area - S . Ft. Cottage (Independent Living) 83 190,000 Condominium (Independent Living) 152 345,000 Personal /Nursing- Memory Care 60/40 81,990 Community Center 2 Guest Units 40,000 Total 337 656,990 Land Area Tabulations are as follows Gross Land Area — 35.56 Acres Net Land Area — 33.50 Acres Gross Density — 9.5 du /Ac. Net Density — 10.1 du /Ac. Open Space — 16.77 Acres /50% of Net Area The zoning and concept plan for this site were approved by City Council on January 16, 2006. It is staff's opinion that the elevations submitted are consistent with the overall approved zoning and concept plan (see Attachment `C', pages 1 — 5). Case No. ZA06 -107 ACTION NEEDED ATTACHMENTS STAFF CONTACT 1) Conduct Public Hearing 2) Consider Site Plan Approval (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (Click Links Below) Site Plan & Elevations Landscape Plans (D) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated September 1, 2006. (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map (F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses (G) Full Size Plans (for Conumi ion and Council Membersv Unly) Ken Baker (748 -8067) Dennis Killough (748 -8072) Case No. ZA06 -107 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNERS: Pinnacle Lifestyles Inc., (Joyce Owen) and Ruby Slayton APPLICANT: Southlake Watermark, LP PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located at 2809 W. Southlake Blvd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 6A01, 61304, 4F, 4G, 4G01, 4F01, 5A0113, a portion of Tracts 6A, and 6A02, J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18 LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District. REQUESTED ZONING: "S -P -2" Generalized Site Plan District. HISTORY: -City Council approved a zoning and concept plan on July 7, 1998. -A site plan was approved for the project on November 17, 1998. -A final plat was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 17, 1999. -A zoning amendment and concept plan modifying the S -P -2 zoning was approved in June of 2002. -City Council approved a zoning change and concept plan for "Watermark at Southlake" (Case ZA05 -124) and its associated a Preliminary Plat (Case ZA05- 144) on January 17, 2006. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Blvd to have 130' of right -of -way. Adequate right -of -way exists for this road. Proposed Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed site will have three (3) access drives directly onto both sides of Owenwood Drive, a proposed collector street along the west portion ofthe site with 60' of right -of -way, which will intersect Southlake Blvd across from West Jellico Circle. The street will eventually extend south to connect to Union Church Road. Existinz Area Road Network and Conditions West Southlake Boulevard is a five lane, undivided thoroughfare with a continuous, two -way, center left turn lane. The roadway is currently being Case No. Attachment A ZA06 -107 Page 1 widened to a seven lane roadway. May, 2005 traffic counts on F.M. 1709 (between FM 1938 (Davis Blvd) & Pearson Lane): Table #1 24hr West Bound (WB) (16,105) East Bound (EB) (16,634) WB Peak A.M. (874) 10 — 11 a.m. Peak P.M. (1,704) 4 — 5 p.m. EB Peak A.M. (1,743) 6 — 7 a.m. Peak P.M. (1,106) 4 — 5 p.m. Traffic Impact Use # Units Vtpd* AM- IN AM- OUT PM- IN PM- OUT Cottages 85 296 3 2 3 5 Condominiums 152 529 4 4 14 10 Personal Care/Nursing 90 215 3 2 9 7 Totals 337 1,040 10 8 26 22 *Vehicle Trips Per Day *The AN"M times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on Southlake Boulevard. Southlake Boulevard, between FM 1938 (Davis Blvd) and Pearson Lane, carries approximately 32,739 vehicles with the peak traffic times occurring between 6 a.m. and 7 a.m. in the morning and between 4 p.m. and 5 p.m. in the afternoon. According to Trip Generation, 6 Edition, the site will generate approximately 21 vehicle trips during the A.M. rush hour and approximately 58 vehicle trips during the P.M. rush hour. WATER & SEWER: The site will connect water services to an existing 12" water line along the south side of Southlake Boulevard. A 10" sewer line extension of approximately 3300 feet is proposed from the southern property line to the south side of Union Church and over to an existing 18" sewer line approximately 600 feet from Davis Blvd. DRAINAGE: The development drains to the southeast through a series of detention ponds within the site. The outfall of the southernmost detention pond will drain to the existing culverts in Union Church Road. P &Z ACTION: September 7, 2006; Approved (7 -0) subject to review; clarifying that the applicant will provide sanitary sewer to church property to the west. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated September 1, 2006. N: \Community Development \MEMO \2006cases \06- 107SP.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA06 -107 Page 2 Vicinity Map Watermere at Southlake MEN ■111 � �� MEN NMI 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet N Case No. ZA06 -107 E Attachment B Page 1 o TR. 4D TR. 6AIA TR. 6B �261111FFA1 Y.4111] -------------- 7R. 7 - M. 4L It I A-RD7 4P U13rnxvvm � 1 � . -. I .�. , �,. 1, ^ UiI IYY V. TR. 41A' , T4 1 4M U", F NM mf I111FT V 1) -- -- — — — — --- - - - - -- T TR. 3. Le°�qA 2027 TR. 4GI x 2q2bA j TI 4-.11 > 0 0 0 Praiqo� - L ARW - 7 C A� .w.,..wm� Sy CENILK MUOPEL' MAM In WATERMARK AT sou PRITAAIDBY k YA"m TR, 5AI 'a GTR Ko� 41wl— momT— Z A05 - 124 I IM ro o 5 1 DDUNDDIITON > ME AmiSE O QWNLR. Tit. 5A2 BUDINGFODTPRUff JAMSCAPE ARRAS ,Vml wn=ff 111. 6A.4 I ins�?t9B3 MUOPEL' MAM In WATERMARK AT sou PRITAAIDBY CONCEPT PLAN GTR Ko� 41wl— momT— Z A05 - 124 I IM ro o 5 1 � (n o ~' o o . I y A CfQ � C9 ALL TRIM $. FASCIA SOFFIT MATERIAL 15 CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL APFROX iMATE AL % � BRICK /C5TONE = 30 STUCCO 3 0 GEM. SIDINGS �O ALL TRIM & FASCIA SOFFIT MATERNAL IS CEMENT :T:OU5 MATERIAL MEM OKY CARE ELEVATION SCALE : 3/32 " =1' -0" A551S I -1 D LI VING NDL LLLVATION �� - SCALE : 3i32 " =k -O" 4 F X 4 O b b O ^ O l l J u � l J r �7' l J H O N 11 o 1-T MATERIAL o (BRICK /STONE - 50 '(STU C O ICEM. SIDING = 10 ALL - RIM 21 FASCIA 5OFr:T MATERIAL 15 OF :NTITIOUS MATERIAL 4PPROY: MATE IAL ie E5RICK/STONE 40 0 G E M. S I D ING so )Il 3 STUCCO 0 M SIDING— 30 ALL TRIM a FASCIA SOFFIT MATERIAL IS CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL SOFFIT MATERIAL 15 CEMENTITIOU5 MATERIAL GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIV PURPOSES ONLY : . YEAR TREATED CE7AR ---------- ---------- --- ------- ------- ------------- 30 Y­ giffit 4 x ­TYr. COTFA6E,51DE, ELEVATION a -------------------- ----------- t. (n TG ,',TYF.CO TA 3E.-ENDTILVATION SCALE : 3/32'=l'-0` ,-TYF. COTTAGE.-KLAK F-LEVATION 4 / ) SCALE : 3/321=11_0• "T, AU ----------------- ALL TRIM B FASCIA --- SOFFIT MATERIAL 15 CEMENTITIOU5 MATERIAL GIVEN FOR ILLUSTRATIV PURPOSES ONLY : . YEAR TREATED CE7AR ---------- ---------- --- ------- ------- ------------- 30 Y­ giffit 4 x ­TYr. COTFA6E,51DE, ELEVATION a -------------------- ----------- t. (n TG ,',TYF.CO TA 3E.-ENDTILVATION SCALE : 3/32'=l'-0` ,-TYF. COTTAGE.-KLAK F-LEVATION 4 / ) SCALE : 3/321=11_0• o ~' o o . I A APPROX: MATE IA ° BRICK /GSTONE= K STUCCO - 50 CE`1. SIDI = 10 ALL TRIM ff FASCIA 5OFFI7 MATERIAL IS CEMENTITIOUS MATE APPROX: MAi =RIAL % 'IBRICK /C 5'ONE = 301 STUCCO 60 jCEM 5IDING = 10 ALL TRIM $ FASCIA SOFFIT MATERIAL IS CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL APPROX' MATERIAL % BRICK /C STONE = 4C 5TUCCO 50 _C EM. 5I0ING = i0 ALL TRIM fi FASCIA SOFFIT MA -ERIAL :5. CEMENTITIOUE MATEI GIVEN FOR II I [ATRATIVP_ P LRP05ES 04LY (�_ - �LU XUKYKESIDENTIAL CONDOS - TYP.COUKTYAKD ELEVATION - SCALE :1116 " =I' -O" I Q F w Y Q = 1 7 I ION .�. l 1 lE- j _.UXUKY RESIDEN COND05 -TYP- STREET ELEVATION SCALE I/16 " =1' -0' ;�� LUX U RY}ZF_SIDENTIALCON DO S- TYP.SIDE ELEVATI o ~' o o . 0 1"r 1"r n I� V � AT `+.AT RSAL 9e 6R17-< /C.STONE = 10 stucco Is C =!'L.. SONG = 15 A-- TRIM � FASCIA SOFFIT MATERIAL 15 CEMENTITIO,J3 MATERIA- FOOF � VEV.CF \ APPROY: H3R' < /C STCN- = AO \ STUCCO '':O GEM- 5IDING = 20 ALL `RIM s FASCIA \ 50FF:7 HATER ?A_ ?C CFM�NT[ - IONS MAT -R[AL ------------------------------ _ __ \_------- GIV -N FOR Ii..LU "TRATIVE °lIR °OSES O:SLY =INiB \ —T E -.11 ( �)CO M M UNITY C UMHOUSE SIDE ELEVATION -- -- - - i I< Q ' W w Y z O oil �A l 1 - MMUNFFY E -F ELEVAT [`0)11:19I-10 iIWITA - 6 1a10Fl:ra: »910711.9 * 6 51 Case No.: ZA06 -107 Review No.: One Date of Review: 7/10/06 Project Name: Site Plan — Watermere Southlake Dear Mr. Killough, Below are the responses to your comments for the Site Plan Review Summary on Watermere at Southlake. Please feel free to contact us should you have any additional questions or comments. 1. Comment: Show all new (proposed) lot boundaries with lot/block, (easements if they have a significant impact on site and structu8re location), boundary bearings and distances. Insure all dimensions and easements match the final plat. Eliminate the old tract boundaries. Label Lot 1, Block 1, Slayton Addition. Response: We will revise plans to reflect all lot boundaries with lot and block titles. Z. Comment: Show sad label a minimum 26 foot the Common Access Easement stubbed into the west boundary and centered over the driveway. Extend the pavement to the west boundary and insure that grades provide accessibility to the adjoining property. Response: We will revise plans to reflect and label of 26 foot minimum common access easement stubbed into the West boundary and centered over the driveway. 3. Comment: Coordinate and show the trail connection to the church property to the east and connections to the south. Show a pedestrian access 8251 Bedford - Euless Road Suite 250 • North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Ph: 817.519.0584 Fx: 817.514.0694 I www.GTFdesign.com Case No. ZA06 -107 Attachment C Page 6 Galier I Tolson 1 French Architecture Planning Project M; nagem -- [`0)11:19I-10 iIWITA - 6 1a10Fl:ra: »910711.9 * 6 51 Case No.: ZA06 -107 Review No.: One Date of Review: 7/10/06 Project Name: Site Plan — Watermere Southlake Dear Mr. Killough, Below are the responses to your comments for the Site Plan Review Summary on Watermere at Southlake. Please feel free to contact us should you have any additional questions or comments. 1. Comment: Show all new (proposed) lot boundaries with lot/block, (easements if they have a significant impact on site and structu8re location), boundary bearings and distances. Insure all dimensions and easements match the final plat. Eliminate the old tract boundaries. Label Lot 1, Block 1, Slayton Addition. Response: We will revise plans to reflect all lot boundaries with lot and block titles. Z. Comment: Show sad label a minimum 26 foot the Common Access Easement stubbed into the west boundary and centered over the driveway. Extend the pavement to the west boundary and insure that grades provide accessibility to the adjoining property. Response: We will revise plans to reflect and label of 26 foot minimum common access easement stubbed into the West boundary and centered over the driveway. 3. Comment: Coordinate and show the trail connection to the church property to the east and connections to the south. Show a pedestrian access 8251 Bedford - Euless Road Suite 250 • North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Ph: 817.519.0584 Fx: 817.514.0694 I www.GTFdesign.com Case No. ZA06 -107 Attachment C Page 6 Galier I Tolson I French Architecture Planning Project Management easement of adequate width to cover the trail where the trail may cross private property. Response: We will revise plans to show the trail connection to the church property to the East. 4. Comment: Insure that the number of units on the plan and sit data summary are correct. The plan shows 235 condo/cottage units instead of 237. Building i appears to have 7 instead of 8 and Building three has 5 instead of 3 as labeled. The concept plan and data summary anticipated 8 and 6 respectively. Response: Plans were mislabeled; we will revise plans to reflect the correct number of units of 237. 5. Comment: Clearly label and identify the public parks and intended improvements to be made as part of this project. Response: We will revise plans to show public parks and intended improvements to be made. 6. Comment: Proposed finished grade of the site shown to contour intervals not exceeding two (2) feet. Spot elevations must be shown at all critical points, including but not limited to edges of pavement, curb returns, building corners, drainage paths, etc. Include directional flow arrows in all flow lines, and all existing drainage structures labeled with size, type flow line elevation. Also show center line of water courses and existing drainage easements. Response: Civil plans show and reflect proposed finish grades and spot elevations. 7. Comment: For resubmission for the public approval process, consolidate the elevations and landscape plans in as few sheets as possible. Response: We will try to consolidate the elevation sheets in as few sheets as possible. 8251 Bedford- Euless Read Suite 250 • North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Ph: 827.514.0584 Fx: 817.514.0694 I www.GTFdesEgn.rom Case No. ZA06 -107 Attachment C Page 7 8. Comment: Remove the parking space from the west buffer yard. Response: We will revise plans to show the parking space from the West Buffer ya rd. Minor alterations of materials on elevations will be made to the "Mon - Visible" elevations IE, rear & side due to project budget projections, however, will conform to the Concept Renderings and overall style. Per meeting held with Parks Department on Wednesday, July 26 The team agreed on minor revisions of Site Plan and will be updated for City Council submission. Sincerely, g u MeM4. e Bryan McMurtre Project Manager RBM Ja rf 8251 Bedford- Euless Road Suite 250 • North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Ph: 817.514.0584 Fx: 817.514.0694 I www.GTFdesign.com Case No. ZA06 -107 Attachment C Page 8 Galier I Tolson I French ArChlterture Planning Project Management 8. Comment: Remove the parking space from the west buffer yard. Response: We will revise plans to show the parking space from the West Buffer ya rd. Minor alterations of materials on elevations will be made to the "Mon - Visible" elevations IE, rear & side due to project budget projections, however, will conform to the Concept Renderings and overall style. Per meeting held with Parks Department on Wednesday, July 26 The team agreed on minor revisions of Site Plan and will be updated for City Council submission. Sincerely, g u MeM4. e Bryan McMurtre Project Manager RBM Ja rf 8251 Bedford- Euless Road Suite 250 • North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Ph: 817.514.0584 Fx: 817.514.0694 I www.GTFdesign.com Case No. ZA06 -107 Attachment C Page 8 July 27, 2006 Mr Dennis Killough City of Southlake Planning Department 1400 Main Street, Suite 320 Southlake, IX76092 Re: Watermere at Southlake City Comments City of Southlake, Texas Dear Mr. Killough: In response to the City of Southlake, Land Design Partners, Inc will address the following stipulations for the site plan review summary completed on July 10, 2006. We propose the following responses: • the landscape plans submitted on June 26, 2006 were submitted for "conceptual" purposes only The quantity of plant material will meet the minimum city requirements • The entry signage, near FM 1709 will be designed per the Parks Department's meeting with Bryan McMurtte on July 26, 2006. • The signar package will be submitted prior to the Council Meeting on August 15` , 2006. • Four inch calipet (4 ") Red Oak trees will be added at 20' on- center in the bufferyatd and land adjacent to the parking lot along the East property line adjacent to Mr . Weisman's property per the approved Concept Plan • The landscape plans will be consolidated to minimize the number of plan sheets Land Design Partners Inc 3345 Bee Caves Road Suite 100 Austin Texas 78746 Ph 512 327 5900 512 328 1253 Fx LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Case No. Attachment C ZA06 -107 Page 9 MT Dennis Killough July 27, 2006 Page 2 • A trail connection to the church property to the east will be added per the approved Concept Plan. • All parking lot landscape islands will contain a minimum of one canopy tree with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, and ornamental grasses • AlI bufferyards will be shown and labeled on the plan as shown on the approved Concept Plan • the approved bufferyard and interior landscape charts will be shown on the plans • A tree Survey Plan will be submitted showing all the existing trees types, caliper inches, and whether they will be removed or preserved We appreciate working with you through the submittal process and look forward to your comments. Upon your review, please call if'you have any questions. Respectfully submitted, C Christopher Joy Project Manager C J /kd Land Design Partners, Inc IN 3345 Bee Caves Road Suite 100 ■ 1 M ■ Austin, Texas 78745 Ph 512 327 5900 512.328 1253 Fx 0 M L A N D D E S I G N PARTNERS Case No. Attachment C ZA06 -107 Page 10 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Click the links below to view the plans Site Plan & Elevations Landscape Plans Case No. Attachment C ZA06 -107 Page 11 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA06 -107 Review No.: Two Project Name: Site Plan — Watermere at Southlake Date of Review: 9/01/06 APPLICANT: Southlake Watermark, LP 3110 W. Southlake Blvd, Ste. 120 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 329 -0207 Fax: (817) 329 -6982 ARCHITECT: Galier, Tolson, French Design Assoc. Phone: (817) 514 -0584 Fax: (817) 514 -0694 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/21/06 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748 -8069 OR BEN BRYNER AT (817) 748- 8602. Show sad label a minimum 26 foot the Common Access Easement stubbed into the west boundary and centered over the driveway. Extend the pavement to the west boundary and insure that grades provide accessibility to the adjoining property. 2. Coordinate and show the trail connection to the church property to the east and connections to the south. Show a pedestrian access easement of adequate width to cover the trail where the trail may cross private property. Clearly label and identify the public parks and intended improvements to be made as part of this project. 4. Proposed finished grade of the site shown to contour intervals not exceeding two (2) feet. Spot elevations must be shown at all critical points, including but not limited to edges of pavement, curb returns, building corners, drainage paths, etc. Include directional flow arrows in all flow lines, and all existing drainage structures labeled with size, type and flow line elevation. Also show centerline of water courses and existing drainage easements. A preliminary utility plan showing all water, sewer, fire hydrants, drainage systems installation and connections to existing systems is required. Although some minor alterations between brick veneer and cultured stone have been made, all building elevations contain the same general, if not exact mix, of brick, stone, stucco, cedar, standing seam metal roof and composition roof as approved on the representative design renderings. Buildings appear to conform to the original approval. A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans /documents and conditions of approval is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or before Case No. ZA06 -107 Attachment D Page 1 acceptance of any other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be reviewed and stamped "approved" by the Planning Department. All development must comply with the City's Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and detain all post development run -off. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. The applicant should be aware that any plan revisions or supplemental information required for the next scheduled meeting following a Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council hearing must be submitted to the City Planning Department no later than 5:OOPM the following Monday. A minimum of twelve (12) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" reduction is required for any plans. If not received by the deadline, the application may be tabled to later meeting agenda. A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. ZA06 -107 Attachment D Page 2 Comprehensive Plan Assessment Environmental Resource Protection Recommendations The ERP Plan recommends that critical environmental and natural features be protected and enhanced, with particular emphasis on trees and floodplains. Further, floodplains, wetlands, and streams should remain in a natural state with tree buffers around these features. The proposed plan preserves a majority of the quality trees and water bodies on the site. Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations The Mobility Plan recommends improving connectivity throughout the city. The proposed site plan provides automobile connections to the sites to the south and to the west. The connection to the south provides the potential for future north -south automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian connectivity from Southlake Blvd. to Union Church. Southlake Pathways Plan Recommendations The Pathways Plan calls for an 8'+ multi -use trail ( 928 in the map below) connecting Southlake Blvd. to Union Church. The proposed site plan shows the 8' trail through the property along Owenwood Drive. The Pathways Plan also recommends an 8'+ east -west multi -use trail (464 in the map below) across the property. This east -west connection is not shown in the proposed site plan but can be accomplished with development of the properties to the south and east. - ..- --_ I r r � k t� The proposed plan also provides a significant internal network of trails in and around the open spaces and linking the different areas of the site. The sidewalks should also connect to the community center. Additional Recommendations Extend the sidewalk on the west side of Owenwood Drive north to Southlake Blvd. Case No. ZA06 -107 Attachment D Page 3 Case No. 06 -107 Review No. _ Dated: September 1, 2006 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: Watermere of Southlake (Site Plan) Comments due to the Planning Department: September 1, 2006 Contact: Keith Martin Phone: (817) 748 -8229 Fax: (817) 481 -5713 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on August 21, 2006 . Comments designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P &Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. BUFFERYARDS: The bufferyards along the east side of Owenwood Drive are pointed out a 20' Bufferyards but are labeled as 10' -A Bufferyards. TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: The design of the development seems to preserve most all of the existing trees on the site. The areas that currently consist of "Quality" trees are located within the north portion of the development adjacent to West Southlake Blvd, and within the west portion of the development which is proposed to be Open Space with a drainage channel or detention that is proposed to be made from the existing pond. It does not look like any proposed development other than a sidewalk or walking path is being provided within the stand of Post Oaks adjacent to West Southlake Blvd. No grade changes are shown within the park area on the west side of Owenwood Drive but to construct the drainage channel there will need to be extensive grading within the critical root zone areas of some of the trees. All protected trees that must be altered to construct the required and permitted improvements based on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan are exempted from the tree replacement and protection requirements of this section. Such improvements may include building pads, required parking areas, driveways, fire lanes, streets, and required utility and drainage infrastructure that are required by City ordinances and have been approved by the appropriate boards or officers of the City. Any protected trees within a building footprint that the approved Tree Conservation Plan determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements contained in Section 9.8 of Ordinance 585 -C. All other areas of the proposed development, including areas in utility easements and areas designated for cut /fill for any purpose other than required drainage and infrastructure improvements, shall be subject to both the tree protection and tree replacement requirements of 585 -C. Case No. ZA06 -107 Attachment D Page 4 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE & BUFFERYARD COMMENTS: Does the plan meet the interior landscape requirements? The submitted landscape plans do not conform to the landscape requirements as approved with the previous Concept Plan and the minimum plant material size requirements of the Landscape Ordinance 544 -A. • The Concept Plan and submitted Site Plan states that 4" Red Oak trees are to be planted 20' on- center in bufferyard and land adjacent to the parking along the East property line adjacent to Mr. Weisman property 469' North and South and 84' East and West for a total of 554'. (No Red Oak trees are proposed to be planted within any of these areas.) • All of the proposed shrubs are shown to be 1 gallon in size at the time of the required landscape installation (The minimum size for shrubs at the time of planting shall be 3 gallon containers. The Landscape Administrator may approve smaller sized shrubs based on unusual growing circumstances and /or on a specific design which reflects the overall intent of the Landscape Ordinance) Does the plan meet the parking lot landscaping requirements? 1. Please ensure that all parking lot landscape islands are no less than 12' from back -of -curb to bk of -curb and equal to the length of the parking stalls. All parking lot landscape islands shall contain the minimum of one (1) canopy tree with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses or seasonal color. Case No. ZA06 -107 Attachment D Page 5 Surrounding Property Owners Watermere at Southlake Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage 1. Hall, Jerry SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.176 2. Hall, Jerry SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.585 3. Hall, Jerry 3 2 L 1 4. Dallas Ashton Resid Llc SF-IA Medium Density Residential 0.459 5. Hopkins, David W & Karen K SF-IA q �5 IV 0.459 6. Griser, David & Karen SF-IA Medium Density Residential 0.459 7. Enriquez, Henry SF-IA Medium Density Residential 0.462 11 SF-IA Medium Density Residential 0.585 9. Mendez, Ltd SF-IA Medium Density Residential 1.0 18 9 16 17 2 [1 21 19 17 15 22 23 1L 8 7 14 24 25 29 13 28 C J 27 4 26 24 Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage 1. Hall, Jerry SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.176 2. Hall, Jerry SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.585 3. Hall, Jerry SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.728 4. Dallas Ashton Resid Llc SF-IA Medium Density Residential 0.459 5. Hopkins, David W & Karen K SF-IA Medium Density Residential 0.459 6. Griser, David & Karen SF-IA Medium Density Residential 0.459 7. Enriquez, Henry SF-IA Medium Density Residential 0.462 8. Mullenix, David W & Raeann SF-IA Medium Density Residential 0.585 9. Mendez, Ltd SF-IA Medium Density Residential 1.0 Case No. Attachment E ZA06 -107 Page 1 10. Goodell, William J SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.63 11. Goodell, William J SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.79 12. Lee, Jane S or James AG Medium Density Residential 5.48 13. Keller Isd AG Public / Semi -Public 9.853 14. Keller Isd AG Public / Semi - Public 18.706 15. Southlake Watermark Holdings S -P -2 Medium Density Residential 8.44 16. Southlake Watermark Holdings S -P -2 Medium Density Residential 1.58 17. Southlake Watermark Holdings SF-IA Medium Density Residential 7.642 18. Southlake Watermark Holdings SF-IA Medium Density Residential 1.224 19. Keller, Nancy L AG Medium Density Residential 2.52 20. Horn & Toad Properties AG Medium Density Residential 4.025 21. Lakeside Pres Ch Grapevine CS Medium Density Residential 7.038 22. Southlake Watermark Holdings S -P -2 Medium Density Residential 8.18 23. Wiesman, E I AG Medium Density Residential 13.482 24. Southlake Watermark Holdings AG Medium Density Residential 6.0 25. Southlake Watermark Holdings S -P -2 Medium Density Residential 2.48 26. Mortazavi, Joseph & Kimiela AG Medium Density Residential 3 27. Mortazavi, Joseph & Kimiela AG Medium Density Residential 3.082 28. Couch, Bobbie J AG Medium Density Residential 4.08 29. Southlake Watermark Holdings S -P -2 Medium Density Residential 1.92 Case No. ZA06 -107 Attachment E Page 2 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Watermere at Southlake Notices Sent: Seventeen (17) Responses: None (0) Case No. ZA06 -107 Attachment F Page 1