The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 7Av .' I MEMORANDUM September 13, 2006 TO: Shana Yelverton, City Manager FROM: Sharen Jackson, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 898; 2" Reading, Approving and adopting the Annual Budget for the Fiscal Year 2006 -07 and approving the revised budget figures for the Fiscal Year 2005 -06 and Multi-year CIP. Action Requested: Approval of Ordinance No. 898, on 2nd reading, Adopting and approving the Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2006 -07 and approving the revised budget figures for the Fiscal Year 2005 -06 and Multi -year CIP. Background Information: Presented to the City Council for consideration are the FY2006 -07 budget and the revised budget for FY2005 -06 and multi -year CIP. This budget summarizes the plan of municipal operations and capital projects for the fiscal year that begins October 1, 2006. The proposed budget was presented to City Council during a budget work session on August 22 also via staffs budget video. The summary budget information presented and attached to Ordinance No. 898 reflects the information presented during the budget work session. Staff has attached a budget work session follow -up document to address questions raised during the work session on August 22 " Financial Considerations: The budget proposed a tax rate of $0.462 with total revenues of $63,085,432 and total expenditures of $57,523,024. Citizen Input/ Board Review: A Public Hearing is scheduled for September 5, 2006 and September 19, 2006 with the 1" and 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 898, respectively. Legal Review: None required Alternatives: In the absence of approving and adopting the proposed budget for FY2006 -07, per the City Charter, the amount appropriated for the current fiscal year shall be deemed adopted for the ensuing fiscal year on a month to month basis with all items in it pro -rated accordingly until such time as the Council adopts a budget for the ensuing fiscal year. Supporting Documents; Ordinance No. 898 Fiscal Year 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and Fiscal Year 200506 Revised Budget summary and multi -year CIP Budget work session follow -up Staff Recommendation- Approval of Ordinance No. 898, 2 nd reading, adopting and approving the Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2006 -07 and approving the revised budget figures for the fiscal Year 2005 -06 and multi -year CIP. ORDINANCE NO. 898 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPROVING REVISED BUDGET FIGURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005 -06; APPROVING AND ADOPTING TIIE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2006, AND TERMINATING SEPTEMBER 30, 2007, AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR EACH DEPARTMENT, PROJECT AND ACCOUNT; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared a revision of certain figures in the 2005 -06 budget and submitted same to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Southlake, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "City ") has caused to be filed with the City Secretary a budget to cover all proposed expenditures of the government of the City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2006, and ending September 30, 2007, (hereinafter referred to as the "Budget "); and WHEREAS, the Budget, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, shows as definitely as possible each of the various projects for which appropriations are set up in the Budget, and the estimated amount of money carried in the Budget for each of such projects; and WHEREAS, the Budget has been filed with the City Secretary for at least thirty (30) days and available for inspection by any taxpayer; and WHEREAS, public notice of public hearings on the proposed annual budget, stating the dates, times, places and subject matter of said public hearings, was given as required by the Charter of the City of Southlake and the laws of the State of Texas; and WHEREAS, such public hearings were held on September 5, 2006 and September 19, 2006, prior approval of such dates being hereby ratified and confirmed by the City Council, and all those wishing to speak on the Budget were heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the Budget and listened to the comments of the taxpayers at the public hearings held therefore and has determined that the Budget attached hereto is in the best interest of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That the revised figures, prepared and submitted by the City Manager for the 2005 -06 budget, be, and the same are hereby, in all things, approved and appropriated, and any necessary transfers between accounts and departments are hereby authorized, approved, and appropriated. Section 3. That the Budget attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes is adopted for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2006, and ending September 30, 2007; and there is hereby appropriated from the funds indicated such projects, operations, activities, purchases and other expenditures as proposed in the Budget. Section 4. That the City Manager shall file or cause to be filed a true and correct copy of the approved Budget, along with this ordinance, with the City Secretary and in the office of the County Clerks of Denton and Tarrant County, Texas, as required by State law. Section 5. That any and all ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, policies or provisions in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed and rescinded to the extent of conflict herewith. Section 6. If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance, or application thereto any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7. That the necessity of adopting and approving a proposed budget for the next fiscal year as required by the laws of the State of Texas requires that this Ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this day of , 2006. ATTEST: Lori Farwell City Secretary Andy Wambsganss, Mayor PASSED AND APPROVED ON second reading this day of , 2006. ATTEST: Lori Farwell City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: Adopted: Andy Wambsganss, Mayor Effective: ALL FUNDS SUMMARY 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:58 AM 05WMs 2004 -05 Actual 2005 -06 Adopted 200546 Amended 1`. $ Increase! (Decrease) Adopted % Increase) - Decrease '. Proposed' 'i $ Increase) (Decrease) Adopted % Increase! - Decrease REVENUES Ad Valorem Taxes $16,852,611 $17,533,626 $17,533,826: $0 0.0/ `$18 $1,179,002 6.7% Sales Tax 12,503,357 13,588,602 15,530,000: 1,941,398 14.3/ 16,492;0001 2,903,396 21.4% Hotel Tax 0 0 0 0 0.0% 308,337; 308,387 100.0% Franchise Fees 1,951,401 2,093,641 2,158 64,401 3.1/ 2,188,723'. 95,082 4.5% Fines 941,664 710,000 1.21-3.000 503,000 70,8% 1,216,000! 506,000 71.3% Charges for Services 715,261 616,300 660 730.; 44,430 7.2% 729,612 113,312 18.4% Rental Income 142,824 142,000 142,000 0 100.0% 142,OD0'. 0 0.0% PermitslFees 2,409,087 1,349,660 2908 758,900 562% 1 393,300 29.1% Miscellaneous 636,793 567,982 749,0161 181,034 31.9% 677,466' 109,484 19.3% Water Sales-residential 9,033,861 8,300,000 .10,100,000.' 1,800,000 21.7% 10,200,000 1,900,000 22.9% Water Sales - commercial 2,230,900 2,600,000 2,700,000 100,000 3.8% 'g.800,000 200,000 7.7% Wastewater Sales 3,498,194 3,500,000 3,700,0001 200,060 5.7% 3,700,000' 200,000 5.7% Sanitation Sales 934,234 940,000 '. 960,000:, 20,000 2.1% 960;000: 20,009 2.1% Other Utility Charges 192,961 273,000 225,550 ! (47,450) -17.4% 285,500, 12,500 4.6% TIF District 2,767,230 1,432,053 3,620,353 2,188,300 152.8/ 2,033,658!° 601,603 42.0% Interest Income 680,063 587.400 794:690 206.604 35.2 / 896.3b0 308.900 52.6% Total Revenues F.702.461 $54.234.464 ': $62.195.077 $7,960,613 14.7% ' $83.1185.432 '= $8.860.968 16.3% EXPENDITURES City Secretary $253,456 $324,334 1307.1. G2 j ($17,232) -5.3% $351;920; $27,586 8,5 Human Resources 285,975 363,365 363,365: 0.0% .382,214; 18,849 5.2 City Manager 475,803 594,050 :: 592.475: (1,575) -0.3% 585,752 -8,298 -1.4% Support Services 2.989.130 3.227,807 3,501 755 273,948 8 5% 3 778'310 550,503 17.1 General Gov Total $4,004,364 $4,509,556 $4,764,697 $26S.141 5.7% 5 098 196 $588,640 13.1% Finance 753,307 864,607 ` 863,902; (705) -0.1% 96 11.7% Municipal Court 414,963 477,319 477,319; 0 0.0 % 531,089; 53,770 11.3% Teen Court 73.026 75,265 75,266 0 0.0% 118.224 - 42,956 57.1 % Finance Total $1.241.296 $1,417,194 $1.416.469 705 0.0% $1.615,177 $197,983 14.0% Fire 3,425,925 3,405,240 :? 3,297,514.E (107,726) -3.2% 3,8 ;935 397,695 11,7% Police 4,473,131 5,189,349 5189.,349 0 00/ 5,600,222 410,873 7.9 Public Safety Support 1,390,845 1,481,083 ;1,465,166: (15,915) -1,1% 1,503,609 i 22,526 1.5% Building Inspections 810.025 863.750 > 81$.214 4f 5.536) -5,3% 719 370 ] 14f 4.380) -16.7 Public Safety Total $10,09 $10.939.422 '' $111.770,245 ($169,1771 -1,5% . :$11.626,136 $686,714 6.3% Streets/Drainage 1,320,486 1,665,072 1,668359' 3,287 02% 1,589,732; (75,340) -4.5 °k Public Works Admin 766,432 883,240 87.8,172.' (5,068) -0.6% 925;989 42,749 4.8% Utility Billing 405,862 285,640 287,640.' 2,000 0.7% 364;363 i. 78,723 27.6% Water 6,354,925 7,689,367 8,834,347 1,144,980 14.9/ 9,551,024! 1,851,657 24.2% Wastewater 1,112,445 1,444,966 1,439,486 (5,480) -0.4% 1,922,268; 477,302 33.0% Sanitation 734.255 705,000 754,506 49,500 7.0% 754,500 49,500 7.0 Public Works Total $10,716,375 $12.673,285 $13.862.504 $1,189,219 0.4% $15,107,876 [ $2,434.581 19.2% Planning 544.586 656.383 650,653 (5,730) -0.9% 931.298 274,915 41.9"K Planning Total $544,586 $656,383 660,653 ($6,73D) -0.9% $931,298 $274,915 41.9 Economic Development 309,512 336.399 ': 32T495 (8.904) -2.6% 391 541 55.142 16.4 Economic Dev. Total $309,512 $336,399 327 495 ($19 -2.6% M,5411 $55,142 16.4 Community Servioes 417,367 455,100 465 030 (70) 0.0 515,061; 49,961 10.7 k Parks and Recreation 2,658,453 3,419,134 ` 3,275 789 (143,345) -4.2% 4,514.,452.: 1,095,318 32.0% ALL FUNDS SUMMARY 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 19:55 AM OBW1t16 Library Services Community Svcs. Total EXPENDITURES. cont. TIF District Crime Control District Vehicle Replacement Strategic initiative Hotel Occupancy Tax Debt Service Total Expenditures Net Revenues Bond /Insurance Proceeds Transfers In Developers Contributions Transfers Out Total Other Sources (Uses) Net change in w1c components Beginning Fund Balance Prior Period Adjustment Residual Equity Transfer Ending Fund Balance 2004 -05 2005 -06 Actual Adopted 447.620 1 444.675 1,572,491 0 379,766 701,605 457,002 282,500 - 2,042,000 i6'1!.'Af�trlrl i6��Y�.1F•L'S`� $0 $0 $5,775,773 $7,038,377 $50,000 $50,000 ($8.020.098) ($7.038,377' ($191.325} 40 $0 $0 $27,589,260 $34,744,168 $0 $0 $0 s0 534.744.168 535.111.429 $ Increase/ (Decrease) % Increase/ Adopted - Decrease i 0 0.0 2,024,305 658,500 100,805 (2,197,000 0 55! 8.113 100.0 93.E 35.7 -107.E 0.1 -3.= 2.1 $0 $3,540,000 $0 $ Increase! (Decrease) % Increase/ Adopted - Decrease 35.489 8.0% 1.180.758 27.3% 0 (426,651) 149,400 558,000 258,935 0,352,6161 53.505.821 $0 ($639,3(6) $0 27.3% 100.0% -14.7% 6.7% PROPOSED BUDGET 2006 -07 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY Special Strategic Special Special Revenue TIF Operating Special Revenue Revenue Occupancy General utility Debt Service Revenue Bicentennial Parksl Fund Fund Fund Fund Reforestation Concessions Recreation Projected Revenues $27,442,537 $18,148,090 $5,849,552 316,200 $39,500 $75,000 Projected Expenditures $27,129,497 $17.999,854 $5 .062,814 $10,009 535,000 $327,000 Net Revenues 3S 3,040 $14a ($220,262 56.200 $4,500 252 900 Tutal Other $ources (Uses) ($1,424,405) (5225,595) $2,033,556 $0 $0 $0 Estimated Fund Balancef $0 ($500,000) $0 $0 ($400,000) ($10,340,009) Working Capital 9130105 $7,985,520 $4,914,212 $3,295,213 $97,605 $128,359 $559,839 Estimated Fund Balancel $40,808,591 $3,225 $358,118 $5,034,951 $1,900,330 $2,893,000 Working Capital 9130106 $6,874,155 $4,836,763 $5,108,697 $103,805 $132,850 $307,639 Special Strategic Hotel Revenue TIF Operating Crime Control Vehicle Initiative Occupancy Recycling Library Fund District Fund Replacement Fund Fund Fund SPOC Funds Total $2,000 $2,036,156 $4,420,000 $90,000 $100,000 $323,387 $4,100 $4,539,000 $63,085,432 $0 $0 $274,954 $431,900 $2,600,000 $255,935 $8,500 $2,377,570 $57,523,024 20110 $2,036,156 $4,145,046 ($341 ($2,5900001 4$4 $2,161.430 $5,562,408 $0 ($2,033,556) ($7,790,000) $0 ($500,000) $0 $0 ($400,000) ($10,340,009) $1,225 $355,618 $8,679,905 $2,322,230 $5,803600 $0 $47,350 $6,619,424 $40,808,591 $3,225 $358,118 $5,034,951 $1,900,330 $2,893,000 $64,452 $42,950 $8,389,854 $36,030,999 PROPOSED BUDGET 2006 -07 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY FUND /DIVISION /CATEGORY 2005 -06 2005 -06 2006 -07 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 2004 -05 Adopted Amended Proposed (Decrease) - Decrease GENERAL FUND Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted Adopted City Secretary /Mayor /Council Personnel 169,557 200,677 200,677 208,263 7,586 3.8% Operations 83,899 123,657 106,425 143,657 20,000 16.2% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% Total 253,456 324,334 307,102 351,920 27,586 8.5% Human Resources Personnel 233,724 249,295 249,295 288,634 39,339 15.8% Operations 52,251 114,070 114,070 93,580 (20,490) -18.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 285,975 363,365 363,365 382,214 18,849 5.2% City Manager's Office Personnel 398,515 494,470 361,970 398,515 (95,955) -19.4% Operations 77,288 99,580 230,505 187,237 87,657 88.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% Total 475,803 594,050 592,475 585,752 (8,298) -1.4% Support Services Personnel 549,654 585,399 585,399 655,618 70,219 12.0% Operations 2,347,016 2,469,177 2,743,125 2,843,141 373,964 15.1% Capital Outlay 92.460 173,231 173.231 279.551 106,320 61.4% Total 2,989,130 3,227,807 3,501,755 3,778,310 550,503 17.1% Finance Personnel 477,116 576,703 576,703 680,012 103,309 17.9% Operations 276,191 283,904 287,199 285,852 1,948 0.7% Capital Outlay 0 4.000 0 0 4c .000) 0.0% Total 753,307 864,607 863,902 965,864 101,257 11.7% Municipal Court Personnel 303,248 311,674 311,674 385,444 73,770 23.7% Operations 111,715 145,645 145,645 145,645 0 0.0% Capital Outlay 0 20.000 20,000 0 (20,000) 0.0% Total 414,963 477,319 477,319 531,089 53,770 11.3% Teen Court Personnel 54,519 54,868 54,868 95,557 40,689 74.2% Operations 18,507 20,400 20,400 22,667 2,267 11.1% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0,0% Total 73,026 75,268 75,268 118,224 42,956 57.1% Fire Services Personnel 2,510,021 2,906,575 2,804,478 3,290,594 384,019 13.2% Operations 459,731 498,665 493,036 476,841 (21,824) -4.4% Capital Outlay 456,173 0 0 35,500 35,500 100.0% Total 3,425,925 3,405,240 3,297,514 3,802,935 397,695 11.7% Police Services Personnel 4,094,310 4,621,529 4,621,529 4,855,677 234,148 5.1% Operations 341,665 502,834 502,834 659,295 156,461 31.1% Capital Outlay 37.156 64,986 64,986 85,250 20,264 0.0% Total 4,473,131 5,189,349 5,189,349 5,600,222 410,873 7.9% PROPOSED BUDGET 2006 -07 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY FUND /DIVISION /CATEGORY 2005 -06 2005 -06 2006 -07 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 2004 -05 Adopted Amended Proposed (Decrease) - Decrease GENERAL FUND Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted Adopted Public Safety Suppo rt Personnel 1,156,993 1,245,643 1,170,788 687,912 (557,731) -44.8% Operations 233,852 232,490 291,430 670,197 437,707 188.3% Capital Outlay 0 2,950 2,950 145,500 142.550 100.0% Total 1,390,845 1,481,083 1,465,168 1,503,609 22,526 1.5% Building Inspection Personnel 780,535 772,024 772,024 664,229 (107,795) -14.0% Operations 29,490 85,626 40,090 52,141 (33,485) -39.1% Capital Outlay 0 6100 6,100 3.000 3( .100) 0.0% Total 810,025 863,750 818,214 719,370 (144,380) -16.7% Streets /Drainage Personnel 551,798 756,089 735,517 750,386 (5,703) -0.8% Operations 717,379 908,983 932,842 839,346 (69,637) -7.7% Capital Outlay 51,309 0 0 0 0 100.0% Total 1,320,486 1,665,072 1,668,359 1,589,732 (75,340) -4.5% Public Works Administration Personnel 662,813 703,313 703,313 760,142 56,829 8.1% Operations 125,619 179,927 174,859 165,847 (14,080) -7,8% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 788,432 883,240 878,172 925,989 42,749 4.8% Planning Personnel 495,681 567,933 565,433 792,682 224,749 39.6% Operations 48,905 83,950 82,720 130,616 46,666 55.6% Capital Outlay 0 4,500 2.500 8.000 3.500 100.0% Total 544,586 656,383 650,653 931,298 274,915 41.9% Economic Development Personnel 225,698 235,146 235,146 247,201 12,055 5.1% Operations 83,814 96,753 88,916 144,340 47,587 49.2% Capital Outlay 0 4.500 3.433 0 4( ,500) 0.0% Total 309,512 336,399 327,495 391,541 55,142 16.4% Community Services Personnel 302,714 307,995 308,295 334,686 26,691 8.7% Operations 114,653 157,105 156,735 180,375 23,270 14.8% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 417,367 465,100 465,030 515,061 49,961 10.7% Parks and Recreation Personnel 1,390,874 1,427,013 1,427,013 2,050,076 623,063 43.7% Operations 1,212,981 1,238,121 1,347,276 1,838,026 599,905 48.5% Capital Outlay 37,233 0 0 68,100 68.100 100.0% Total 2,641,088 2,665,134 2,774,289 3,956,202 1,291,068 48.4% Library Services Personnel 314,669 336,382 336,382 372,546 36,164 10.8% Operations 51,504 33,910 33,910 42,619 8,709 25.7% Capital Outlay 62,569 65,000 65.000 65.000 0 0.0% Total 428,742 435,292 435,292 480,165 44,873 10.3% PROPOSED BUDGET 2006 -07 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY FUNDIDIVISIONICATEGORY GENERALFUND TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2005 -06 2004 -05 Adopted Actual Budget Budget Budget 21,795,799 23,972,792 24,150,721 27,129,497 2005 -06 2006 -07 $ Increase/ % Increase/ Amended Proposed (Decrease) - Decrease Adopted Adopted 3,156,705 13.2% PROPOSED BUDGET 2006 -07 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY FUN DIDIVISION /CATEGORY 2005 -06 2005 -06 2006 -07 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 2004 -05 Adopted Amended Proposed (Decrease) - Decrease Actual Budge f Budget Budget Adopted Adopted UTILITY FUND Utility Billing Personnel 168,711 193,605 193,605 236,592 42,987 22.2% Operations 237,091 88,035 88,035 114,271 26,236 29.8% Capital Outlay 0 4.000 4,000 5 11000 100.0% Total 405,802 285,640 285,640 355,863 70,223 24.6% Water Utilities Personnel 760,843 967,581 967,581 1,011,590 44,009 4.5% Operations 5,594,082 6,539,036 7,449,266 7,834,166 1,295,130 19.8% Capital Outlay 0 182,750 417,500 705,268 522,518 285.9% Total 6,354,925 7,689,367 8,834,347 9,551,024 1,861,657 24.2% Wastewater Utilities Personnel 303,979 364,641 364,641 295,153 (69,488) -19.1% Operations 808,466 1,077,725 1,072,245 1,503,515 425,790 39.5% Capital Outlay 0 2,600 2,600 123,600 121.000 4653.8% Total 1,112,445 1,444,966 1,439,486 1,922,268 477,302 33.0% Sanitation Operations 734,285 705.000 754,500 754,500 49,500 7.0% Total 734,285 705,000 754,500 754,500 49,500 7.0% Non-Departmentalized Debt Service 5,965,079 5.958,268 5,399,655 5,416,199 (542,069) -9.1% Total 5,965,079 5,958,268 5,399,655 5,416,199 (542,059) -9.1% TOTAL UTILITY FUND 14,572,536 16,083,241 16,713,628 17,999,854 1,916,613 11.9% DEBT SERVICE FUND Principal 2,833,747 2,703,644 2,703,644 2,323,948 (379,696) - 14.0% Interest 3,748,226 4,913,713 4,913,713 3,738,866 (1,174,847) - 23.9% Administrative Expenses 148.500 7.000 7,000 7,000 0 0.0% Total 6,730,473 7,624,357 7,624,357 6,069,814 (1,554,543) -20.4% SPECIAL REVENUE REFORESTATION FUND Operations 1,616 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 1,616 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% SPECIAL REVENUE BICENTENNIAL CONCESSIONS Operations 4,000 35,000 5,000 35,000 0 0.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 4,000 35,000 5,000 35,000 0 0.0% PROPOSED BUDGET 2006 -07 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY FUND /DIVISIONICATEGORY 2005 -06 2005 -06 2006 -07 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 2004 -05 Adopted Amended Proposed (Decrease) - Decrease Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted Adopted SPECIAL REVENUE PARKS & RECREATION FUND Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Capital Outlay 4,734 505,000 282,500 327,000 17{ 8,000) 0.0% Total 4,734 505,000 282,500 327,000 (178,000) 0.0% SPECIAL REVENUE LIBRARY DONATION FUND Operations 18,878 9,384 9,384 0 (9,384) 0.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 18,878 9,384 9,384 0 (9,384) 0.0% TIF FUND Operations 1,572,491 0 2,024,305 0 0 0.0% Total 1,572,491 0 2,024,305 0 0 0.0% CRIME CONTROL DISTRICT FUND Personnel 239,312 308,794 308,794 138,954 (169,840) -55.0% Operations 140,454 152,811 811,311 0 (152,811) - 100.0% Capital Outlay 0 240,000 240,000 136,000 (104,000) 0.0% Total 379,766 701,605 1,360,105 274,954 (426,651) -60.8% SPDC FUND Personnel 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Operations & Maintenance 7,015 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0.0% Capital Outlay 0 154,000 154,000 136,250 (17,750) 0.0% Debt Service 2,811,918 2.447,324 2,447,824 2,191,320 25( 6.004) -10.5% Total 2,818,933 2,651,324 2,651,824 2,377,570 (273,754) -10.3% Strategic Investment Fund Capital Outlay 0 2,042,000 205,000 2,600.000 558,000 100.0% Total 0 2,042,000 205,000 2,600,000 558,000 Vehicle Replacement Operations 457,002 282.500 383,305 431,900 149,400 0.0% Total 457,002 282,500 383,305 431,900 149,400 Hotel Occupancy Fund Operations 0 0 0 258,935 258,935 100.0% Total 0 0 0 258,935 258,935 Recycling Fund Operations 0 0 2,000 81500 8,500 100.0% Total 0 0 2,000 8,500 8,500 GRAND TOTAL -ALL FUNDS 48,356,228 53,917,203 55,422,129 57,523,024 3,605,821 6.7% PROPOSED BUDGET 2006 -07 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY FUND /CATEGORY 2005 -06 2005 -06 2006 -07 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 2004 -05 Adopted Amended Proposed (Decrease) - Decrease FUND Actual Bud_Q Budget Budget Adopted Adopted General Fund Personnel 14,672,439 16,352,728 16,020,504 17,518,174 1,165,446 7.1% Operations 6,386,460 7,274,797 7,792,017 8,921,422 1,646,625 22.6% Capital Outlay 736,900 345,267 338.200 689.901 344,634 99.8% Total 21,795,799 23,972,792 24,150,721 27,129,497 3,156,705 13.2% Utility Fund Personnel 1,233,533 1,525, 827 1,525,827 1,543, 335 17,508 1.1% Operations 7,373,924 8,409,796 9,364,046 10,206,452 1,796,656 21.4% Capital Outlay 0 189,350 424,100 833,868 644,518 340.4% Debt Service 5,965,079 5.958.268 5,399,655 5,416,199 54( 2.069) -9.1% Tota 1 14, 572,536 16,083,241 16, 713, 628 17, 999, 854 1,916,613 11.9% Debt Service Fund Debt Service 6,730,473 7,624,357 7,624,357 6,069,814 (1,554,543) -20.4% Total 6,730,473 7,624,357 7,624,357 6,069,814 (1,554,543) -20.4% Special Revenue - Reforestation Fund Operations 1,616 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 1,616 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% Special Revenue - Bicentennial Concessions Operations 4,000 35,000 5,000 35,000 0 0.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 4,000 35,000 5,000 35,000 0 0.0% Special Revenue - Parks /Recreation Fund Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Capital Outlay 4.734 505,000 282,500 327,000 17( 8.000) 0.0% Total 4,734 505,000 282,500 327,000 (178,000) 0.0% Special Revenue - Library Donation Fund Operations 18,878 9,384 9,384 0 (9,384) 0.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 18,878 9,384 9,384 0 (9,384) 0.0% TIF Fund Personnel 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Operations 1572.491 0 2,024,305 0 0 0.0% Total 1,572,491 0 2,024,305 0 0 0.0% Crime Control District Fund Personnel 239,312 308,794 308,794 138,954 (169,840) -55.0% Operations 140,454 152,811 811,311 0 (152,811) - 100.0% Capital Outlay 0 240,000 240,000 136,000 10( 4.000) 0.0% Total 379,766 701,605 1,360,105 274,954 (426,651) - 60.8% SPDC Fund Personnel 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Operations 7,015 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0.0% Capital Outlay 0 154,000 154,000 136,250 (17,750) Debt Service 2.811,918 2.447.324 2,447,824 2.191,320 256,004) -10.5% Total 2,818,933 2,651,324 2,651,824 2,377,570 (273,754) -10.3% Vehicle Replacement Capital Outlay PROPOSED BUDGET 2006 -07 282,500 383,305 431900 149,400 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY Total 457,002 282,500 383,305 EXPENDITURES BY FUND /CATEGORY 149,400 22.3% Hotel Occupancy Fund 1,198,636 2005 -06 2005 -06 2006 -07 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 37.2% 2004 -05 Adopted Amended Proposed (Decrease) - Decrease FUND Actual Budget Budget Budget Ad d Adopted Strategic Investment Fund 0 258,935 258,935 55,422,129 Capital Outlay 0 2.042.000 205,000 2.600.000 558,000 100.0% Total 0 2,042,000 205,000 2,600,000 558,000 0 Vehicle Replacement Capital Outlay 457,002 282,500 383,305 431900 149,400 0.0% Total 457,002 282,500 383,305 431,900 149,400 22.3% Hotel Occupancy Fund 1,198,636 3,758,117 2,027,105 5,154,919 1,396,802 37.2% Operations 0 0 0 258,935 258,935 0.0% Total 0 0 0 258,935 258,935 55,422,129 Recycling Fund 3,605,821 6.7% Operations 0 0 2,000 8,500 8,500 0.0% Total 0 0 2,000 8,500 8,500 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 48,356,228 53,917,203 55,422,129 57,523,024 3,605,821 6.7% EXPENDITURE CATEGORY Personnel 16,145,284 18,187,349 17,855,125 19,200,463 1,013,114 5.6% Operations 15,504,838 15,941,788 20,068,063 19,490,309 3,548,521 22.3% Capital Outlay 1,198,636 3,758,117 2,027,105 5,154,919 1,396,802 37.2% Debt Service 15.507,470 16.029,949 15,471,836 13.677.333 (2,352,616) -14.7% GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 48,356,228 53,917,203 55,422,129 57,523,024 3,605,821 6.7% GENERAL FUND 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 03:02 PM OB130106 REVENUES Ad Valorem Taxes Sales Tax Franchise Taxes Fines Charges for Services PermitsfFees Miscellaneous interest Income Total Revenues EXPENDITURES City Secretary Human Resources City Manager Support Services General Gov. Total Finance Municipal Court Teen Court Finance Total Fire Police Public Safety Support Building Inspections Public Safety Total Streets/Drainage Public Works Admin Public Works Total Planning Planning Total Economic Development Economic DLv. Total Community Services Parks and Recreation Library Services Community Svcs. Total Total Expenditures Net Revenues Lease Proceeds Transfers In Transfers Cut Total Other Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance Residual Equity Transfer Ending Fund Balance Fund balance percentage 2004 -05 2005 -06 Actual Adopted 475,803 594,050 $11,628,911 $12,131,944 6,384,523 6,707,650 1,961,401 2,093,641 941,664 710,000 715,261 616,300 2,314,424 1,274,660 527,518 405,482 229.667 175.000 $24,703,369 $24,114,677 $253,456 $324,334 285,975 363,365 475,803 594,050 2.989.130 3.227,807 $ 4,04,364 4 509 556 753,307 864,607 414,963 477,319 73,026 75.268 $ 1,241,296 1 417 194 3,425,925 3,405,240 4,473,131 5,189,349 1,390,845 1,481,083 810,025 863.750 $10,099,926 $10.939,,422. 1,320,486 1,665,072 788,432 883.240 2108918 $2 544,586 656,383 $ 544,586 $656,383 309.512 335.399 $ 309, $336,399 417,367 465,100 2,641,088 2,665,134 428,742 435.292 $ 3,487,197 3 565 526 $21,795,799 $23,972,792 2 907 7 14� 1.885 $0 $0 0 0 $10,578,667 $12,358,999 $0 $12.356.999 59.338.684 53.90% 34.42% $ Increase/ (Decrease) % Inorease/ Adopted - Decrease $0 0.0% 1,022,350 15.2% 64,401 3.1% 503,000 70.8% 44,430 7.2% 585,900 45.0% 89,484 22.1% 55.000 31.4% $2,364,565 918°/ ($17,232) 0 (1,575) 273,948 $ 265,141 (705) 0 0 (107,726 0 (15,915 3,287 -5.3% 0.0% -0.3% 8.5% 5.7% -0.1 -1.1% 0.2% -0.6% .0.1% -0.9% .0.9% 109,155 0 $ 10g,085 $177,929 $2, 186 ,636 $0 0 4.1 % 0.0% 3.1% $ increase! (Decrease) % Increase/ Adopted I - Decrease $821,332 6.8% 1,244,350 18.6% 95,082 4.5% 506,000 71.3% 113,312 16.4% 393,300 30.9% 79,484 19.6% 75.000 42.9% $3,327,860 13.8% $27,586 18,849 (8,298) 550.503 5811640 101,257 53,770 42.956 $ 197,983 397,695 410,873 22,526 14( 4.380) $ 686,714 (75,340) 42.749 4$ 32,591 274.915 $ 274,915 55.142 $ 55,142 49,961 1,291,068 44,873 $ 1,385,902 $3,156,705 55 8.5% 5.2% -1.4% 17.1% 13.1% 11.7% 11.^ 57.1% 14.0% 11.7% 7.9 % 1.5% -16.7 % 41 16.4% 101% 48.4% 10.3% 38.9% 13.2 GENERAL FUND Strategic Initiative Fund 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:55 AM 05130106 REVENUES Interest Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Infrastructure Maintenance Community Enhancement Technology Infrastructure Capital Acquisition Total Expenditures Net Revenues Transfer from other funds Transfer to other funds Total Other Sourcesl(tlses) Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $ Increase/ $ increase! 2004 -05 2005 -06 2005 -06 ': (Decrease) % Increase! 2006 =07 (Decrease) % increase! Actual Adopted Amended Adopted - Decrease Proposed. Adapted - Decrease 0 50.000 50 400 0 0.0% 100:000 50.000 100.0 $0 $50,000 :1150 000 $0 0.0% $100,000 ! $50,000 900.0°/ $0 $800,000 $155,000; ($645,000) 0.0 43.40,000 (500,000) -62.5% 0 500,000 50;000. (450,000) 0.0% 42%000 (80,000) -16.0% 0 1;880 000: 1,880,000 100.0% 0 742.000 0 74( 2.00p) 0.0% D (742,000) 00.0% $0 $2,042,000 $205 ($1,837,000) 0.0% $2,500 000 $558,000 10010°/ $1.837.000 ($2.500.0001 IS508.0001 $0 $3,160,000 $6,740,04q. $1,700,000' : 000 ($2;200,000 U0 gL.L( 0.U00 :.S5 .95&00Q 000 500 000 $0 $0 �0 sJ $6,803:00 52 803 000 UTILITY FUND 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:$6 AM 081361E REVENUES Miscellaneous Interest Income Water Sales - residential Water Sales- commercial Sewer Sales Sanitation Sales Other utility charges Total Revenues EXPENSES Debt Service Utility Billing Water Wastewater Sanitation Total Expenses Net Revenues Transfers In Developers Contributions Transfers Out Total Other Sources (Uses♦ Net Change In WfC Components Beginning working capital Ending fund balance No. of days working capital 2004 -05 2005 -06 Actual Adopted 6,354,925 7 53.8 $168,247 $75,000 99,795 65,000 9,033,861 8,300,000 2,230,900 2,600,000 3,498,194 3,500,000 934,234 940,000 192,961 273.000 $16,156,192 $15,753,000 $ Increase/ (Decrease) I % increase! Adopted - Decrease $77,500 5,958,268 0.0 °i 35,000 6,354,925 7 53.8 1,800,000 1,444,966 21.7 ° r 100,000 $14,572,536 $ 3.89 200,000 � 5.7 1 r 20,000 0 0 2.1 0 r (47,450) - 17.45 $2,185,050 3 639,79 $ 13.99 $ Increase/ (Decrease) % Increasel Adopted I - Decrease $27,500 5,958,268 0.0% 35,000 6,354,925 7 53.8% 1,900,000 1,444,966 22.9 200,000 $14,572,536 $ 7.7% 200,000 � 5.7% 20,000 0 0 2.1% 12.500 4.6 $2,395,000 3 639,79 $ 15.2% 5,965,079 5 5,958,268 405,802 2 285,640 6,354,925 7 7,689,367 1,112,445 1 1,444,966 734.285 7 705,000 $14,572,536 $ $16,083,241 15 � � $50,000 $ $50,000 0 0 0 $2,004,134 $ $3,639,790 3 639,79 $ $3,359.5 (558,613 0 1,144,980 (5,480 49,500 $630,367 $1.554.563 _g 0 14 -0 7 (542,069) -9.1% 70,223 24.6% 1,861,657 24.2% 477,302 33.0% 49.500 7.0% $1,916,613 11.9% 5476.387 DEBT SERVICE FUND 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:55 AM DOW= REVENUES Ad Valorem Taxes Miscellaneous Income Interest Income Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Principal Interest Admin. Expenses Total Expenditures Net Revenues Transfers In Transfer Out Total other Sourcesf(Uaes) Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance 2004 -05 2005 -06 Actual Adopted $5,223,700 $5,401,882 $0 $❑ 64.185 90,900 $5,287,885 $5,491,862 $ Increase! 16 (Decrease) % Increase/ ed Adopted - Decrease $❑ $D 0 $0 $2,833,747 $ Increase/ $3,748,226 $4,913,713 (Decrease) % Increase/ $6,730,473 Adopted - Decrease 52 $357,676 6.6% 60 ` $0 0.0% JD . 0 0.0% 52 $357,670 6.5% $2,833,747 $2,703,644 $3,748,226 $4,913,713 $148.50 0 STOOD $6,730,473 $7,624,357 $0 0.0% 0 D. D% 0 0.0% $0 0.0% LO 1,569,150 1,432,453 0 ❑ 569.150 $9.432053 $3,869,073 $3,995,635 $3.295.213 N Opp I.,vas - Y.v (1,174,847) -23.9% 0 0,0% $1,554,543) -20.4% 9 912 213 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Reforestation 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:55 AM 08130108 REVENUES Permits /Fees Miscellaneous Interest Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Parks and Recreation Reforestation Capital Total Expenditures Net Revenues Transfer to other funds Total Other Sourcesl(ttses) Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $ Increase! $ Increase! 2004 -05 2005 -06 .2005-.06: ':; (Decrease) % Increasel 2006;; -07 (Decrease) % Increasel Actual Adopted Amended Adopted - decrease Proposed Adopted - Decrease $99,240 $15,000 $280D0 $13,000 100,0% $15000; $0 100.0% 0 0 0! 0 0,0 1 /. O 0 0.0% 1 723 1 200 1100; 600 100.0% 1 200: 4 100.0% $12,963 $16,200 :. $29,600; $13,600 0.0% $76,200'; $0 100.0% 1,616 10,000 1110000, 0 100.0 11D000i 0 100.0% 0 0 0' 0.0% $1,616 $90,000 $10,900: $0 0.0% $10 000' $0 100.0 i L13.m L $a La 12 $66,458 $77,605 $84.005 F. $77,805'; 991,605 € $103.809 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Bicentennial Concessions 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:56 AM 06130106 REVENUES PermUlFees Miscellaneous Interest Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Parks and Recreation Park Improvements Land Total Expenditures Net Revenues Bond proceeds Transfer to other funds Total Other Sourcesl(Uses) Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $ Increasel $ Increasel 2004 2005 - 06 2005.06 k- (Decrease) % Increase/ 2006 -07 (Decrease) % Increase/ Actual Adopted . : : Amended.: Adopted Decrease Proposed s', Adopted - Decrease $0 $0 $7, $0 0.0% $a' $0 0,0 35,057 35,000 35,000? 0 0,0% 35,U00 0 0.0% 3 750 2 000 4 1 0 0p r 2 J 000 0.0% 4�500 2 _ 0.0% $38,817 $37,000 $39,000 < $2,000 0.0% $39,600 •, $2,500 0.0% $4 ,000 $5,000 $S;OOQ S $0 0.0 % ;'$5 000.'; 0 0.0% 0 30,000 (30,000) 0.0% 30,900f 0 0,0% 0 0 04 0 0.0% ❑ 0 0.0% $4,000 $35,000 $5,,000', ($30,000) 0.0% WOOD $0 0.0% >31 ' M a� $0 $0 $0' $Oz' LO L I $59,533 $94,350 ;! 4 9'128-351} d $128,3 5732.854 ti SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Library Donations 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 17:56 AM 08130106 REVENUES Donations Interest Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Special Projects Library supplies Capital Total Expenditures Net Revenues Transfer to other funds Total Other Sourcesl(Uses) Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $ Increase/ $ Increasel 2004 - 05 2005 -06 2005 - (Decrease) % Increasel 2006 -D7 (Decrease) %Increase] Actual Adopted Aniet3ded Adopted Decrease Proposed '' Adopted - Decrease $19,870 $4,500 $4,$041 $0 0.0% $2 000 - {$2,500) - 55.6% 139 100 100' 0 0.0% :. (100) - 100.0% $24,009 $4,600 $4640', $0 0.0% $2,000 ($2,604) 56.5% 18,878 9.384 9,364 ! 0 0.0% 0.' (9,384) 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% $18,878 $9,384 $9,384', $0 0.0% $0 ($9,384) 0.0% $1"131 fS4.784t . 1 $2,000 I 0.7B NO �0 NO 1$? $4,878 $6,009 $ $1225: $ 6.00 $1.225 $9.225 $3.225 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Park Dedication 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:56 AM 08r3010fi REVENUES Permits /Fees Miscellaneous Interest Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Parks and Recreation Park Improvements Land Total Expenditures Net Revenues Bond proceeds Transfer to other funds Total Other Sourcesf(Uses) Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $a $0 4,734 $increase! 0 0 $Increase/ $5D5,DDD 2004 -05 2005 -06 2005 -06 (Decrease) % Increase/ 2006 -07 (Decrease) % Increase/ Actual Adopted Am ended 1 Adopted - Decrease PrOposied '' Adopted - Decrease $83,423 $60,000 $220 $160,000 266.7% $60,000; $0 0.0% 0 0 0., 0 0.0% 0 0 RO% 13 497 6 600 1.5.50D 8 600 134.8% 15:000 { 8 600 127.3% $96,920 $66,600 $235 500.; $168,9D0 253 6°/ $75,,000 $8,400 12.6% $a $0 4,734 505,000 0 0 $4,734 $5D5,DDD 592.186 438 400' $0 $0 SO 12 0 $514,653 $606,839 5 166 439 $0 0.0% .f$0 0 0.0% (222,500) 0 0 /0 327 [978,000) 0.0% 0 0.04 0 0 0.0% ;$222,600} 0.0% $327,000 ($ 178,000} 0.0% 3914001 3252•o591 5186.400 TIF OPERATING FUND 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:56 AM 08130/06 REVENUES Ad Valorem Interest Income Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Operations Total Expenditures Net Revenues Transfers In- General Fund Transfers Out -Dent Service Total Other Sources {Uses) Beginning Fund Balance Prior period adjustment Ending Fund Balance $ Increasel $ Increase/ 2004 - 05 2005 - 2005 -06 (Decrease) % Increase / 2006 - 07j . (Decrease) ° /a Increasel Actual Adopted Amended ` Adopted - Decrease : . . .. 'Proposed. .. Adopted - Decrease $2,767,230 $1,432,453 $3;620,353; $2,188,300 1528 °k $2,033,656, $601,603 42.0% $4,217 $500 $3.500 $3,000 0.0 $ 2,5001 $2.00 0 0.0 $2,771,447 $1,432,553 $3623853 $2,191,300 153.0% $2,036,16 $601,603 42.0% $1.572.491 �0 $2,024505 2.024.305 0.0% $00'; D 0.0% $1,572,491 $0 $2024,305.' $2,024,306 0.0% $0' $0 0.0% 51.198.956 51.432.553 4 $1.599.548 ? 0` 166.995 $2.fl36.156 Cl $643.603 $4 (1,150,000) (1.432.053) (1,d32.053) 0 (2,033;8561 ($601,603) (51.150.0001 (51.432.0631 151,432,053! (32033:5561 $139,167 $188,123 $188123; $355,618; D 0 0 �'` !s 0; CRIME CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:56 AM 08130106 REVENUES Sales Tex Grant Income Interest Income Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Personnel Operations Capital Total Expenditures Net Revenues Transfer out -Crime Control CIP Transfers Out -for Debt Service Total Other Sources (Uses) Beginning f=und Balance Ending Fund Balance 2004 -05 2005 -06 Actual Adopted $80,000 0.0 % $3,025,506 $3,405,532 $12,752 $0 $ 125,074 $70,00 0 $3,163,332 $3,475,532 $ Increase! (Decrease} % Increasel Adopted - Decrease $494,468 145% $0 #DIV101 $80,000 0.0 % $574,468 16.5% $ Increase/ (Decrease) % Increase! Adopted I - Decrease $849,468 24.9% $0 #DIV10! $ 95,00 135.7% $944,468 27.2% $239,312 $308,794 $140,454 $152,811 1 240 . 00 $379,766 $701,605 $o $0 41( 9.150) 0 9150 $3,624.694 $5,989,110 969 110 8 763 037 $0 0.0% 658,500 430.9% 0 0.0% $658,500 93.9° (152,811) - 100.0% 90( 4.000) -43,3% ($426,651) -60,8% X1.371.119 SPDC - OPERATING FUND Parks /Recreation 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 7 7:56 AM OB130106 REVENUES Safes Tax Rental income Interest Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Personnel Operations Capital Total Expenditures Net Revenues Transfers Out Proceeds from C.O. Sale Total Other Sources(Uses) Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $0 $0 $7,015 $ Increase) _L0 15 4.00a $ Increase/ $204,000 2004 - 05 2005 - 06 2005 06 (Decrease) % increase! . D (Decrease) % Increase/ Actual Adopted Amended : Adopted -Decrease d Adopted Decrease 17 750 0.0% $0 0.0% $186 250. $3,093,328 $3,475,420 $3 000 $424,580 12.2% $4.;285 D00 $809,580 23.3% 142,824 142,000 ;. 142,000 0 100.0% 142 000: 0 100.0% 83,612 100,000 100A00 ! 0 a0% 100 000 ] 0 0.0/a $3,319,764 $3,717,420 $4,142,000 $424,580 11.4% $4.,,527 $809,580 21.81 $0 $0 $7,015 $50,000 _L0 15 4.00a $7,015 $204,000 74 53.513.420 (3,321,710) (2,446,324 D D (53.321.7105 ($2.446.324 $4,421,821 54.412.86 0 $4,412,860 55.479.956 $0 0.0 $0 j $0 0.0% p 0.0 °/ $50;000: 0 0.0% D 0.0 % 3$1 13.2- 17 750 0.0% $0 0.0% $186 250. ($17,750) 0.0% 424 $4.340.754 { $827.330 $0 ; 8%820) 143,496 SPDC - DEBT SERVICE FUND Parks /Recreation 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:56 AM 0013cl06 REVENUES Interest Income Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Principal interest Admin. Expenses Total Expenditures Net Revenues Bond Proceeds Transfers in Total Other Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $0 $0 $3.321.710 $ Increasel $3.321.710 82.446.324 $Increase! $7D8,386 09 3 2004 -05 2005 -06 200506 (Decrease) % Increasel ,2006.07 (Decrease) % Increase! Actual Adopted : Amended.: I Adopted - Decrease Prop&ed Adopted - Decrease $ 10,40 $2.000 8 000 $6,000 300.0% 1�'o0D 1$ D,DDD 500.0% $10,403 $2,000 WOOD $6,000 300 0% $12 ;00D. $10,000 500.0% $1,920,000 $835,000 $8.35,000: $0 00% $1035,.0017: $200,000 24.0% 862,573 1,611,324 1 j. 0 0.0% 1154j= (455,504) -28.3% 29,345 1 DDD 1 540 500 500/ 1'500 500 50.0% $2,811,918 [S2.801.5151 $2,447,324 ($2, 445.32 $2447,824.''. (52.439.8241 $600 $1.000 0.0% , $2,191,320 ( .179.8201 ($256,004) ($255.5041 -10.5% $0 $0 $3.321.710 $2.446,324 $3.321.710 82.446.324 $188,193 $708.388 $7D8,386 09 3 0 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Hotel Occupancy 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:56 AM 00130106 REVENUES Taxes Interest Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Personnel Operations Capital Total Expenditures Net Revenues Transfer to other funds Total Other 5aurcesf(Uses} Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $Increase! !:V I ?, $ Increase! 2004 -05 2005 -06 .2005-06: ' (Decrease) % Increase 200647 (Decrease) % Increase! Actual Adopted Amended ' Adopted - Decrease PrOpOSed Adopted - Decrease $0 $0 $0; $0 100.0% $308,387 $308,387 100.0% 0 0 0 0 100.0% 1:5.000 15.000 100.0% $0 $0 $0. $0 10D.0% $323387.'; $323,387 100.0% 0 0 0. 0 100.0% 258935': 258,935 100.0% 0.0 % Yf% 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0% $258935'. $258,935 0.0 0 $� $64.452 44 2 K L ' 22 $0 $0 44 >. GENERALFUND Recycling 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:56 AM 08130/06 REVENUES Recycling Recovery Interest Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Special Projects Recycling Supplies Capital Total Expenditures Net Revenues Transfer to other funds Total Other Sources] {Uses) Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $ Increase! $ Increase/ 2004 -05 2005 -06 2005-06. (Decrease) % Increase 200fi 07 `? (Decrease) % Increase/ Actual Adopted Amended Adopted - Decrease Proposed Adopted - Decrease $5,500 $0 $$,000.; $6,000 100.0% $3,000: $3,000 100.0% 796 0 1100? 1100 100.0 % 1100 1100 100.0% $6,296 $0 $7,100 $7,100 #DIV /01 $4,100;' $4,100 100.0% $0 $0 $0 ; $0 0.0% $51 1 9013.'1 5,000 0.0% 0 0 2,006' 2,000 100.0% 3500.'1 3,500 100.0% $D $D $2,000 $2,000 010% $8,500 0.0% i$4-4001 1 $'Q 16 `525Y $p ;($16.52 9b $52,479 $58,775 $58,775 ? $4735.0 i $56.775 77 $47.350 j.. VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 2006 -07 Proposed Budget and 2005 -06 Revised Budget 11:55 AM 06130106 REVENUES Miscellaneous Interest Income Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Capital Total Expenditures Not Revenues Transfers In- General Fund Transfers Out -Debt Service Total Other Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance Prior period adjustment Ending Fund Balance $ Increase/ $ increase/ 2004 -05 2005 -06 2 06 (Decrease) Increas 2006 -07 .; (Decrease) °Increase! Actual Adopted Atnertded Adopted Decreas PtDposed'[' Adapted Decrease $69,839 $48,000 $56,050, $8,050 16.8% $5Q,U00': $2,000 4.2% $ 43,225 $25,000 40 . 000 ', $15,DOO 60.0% '' $40,000 $15,000 60.0% $193,064 $73,000 $96,054 $23,050 $90,QQ0j $2,000 $ 457,002 $282.500 :..,:$383, 100.805 353% $43f.Obb j 149.400 52.9% $457,002 $282,500 $3$3,305..1 $100,805 35.7% $431,900 $149,400 52.9% 343 938 ($209.500! 2612 5 77 3419 I$132.4001 $887,913 0 0. 7A `. $0 $0 Q .. $2,065,510 $2,609,485 $2,609,485.; $2,22,230' 0 0 ;p? 0 $2.609.485 $2,399.981 $2,322:23E1 $1.980.33Q p Project Nartre Prior FY2007 FY2008 Moos FY2010 FY2011 Beyond Tohal Description Sewer impact Fee Fund Z3c13 Funds provide staff and council the ability to reimburse developers for the oversizing of sewer Imes to meet 1 Reimbursements for Oversizmg 1101i5es ( Developer Sewer j - Future Projects i l) y $ 50 p $ 55 $ 50 $ 50 S 50 S '. $ 2` requirements of the master sewer plan in cases where the �ZL developer is not required to provide the ultimate size of the line to serve his/her development. Totals: ; 5fl ; 50 $ 50 $ at $ s0 $ - $ 250 Water Impact Fee Fund t z7)1 Funds provide staff and cvuncif the ability to reimburse developers for the of water lines to meet �f oversizing 1 Developer Reimbursements for oversizing Mllles (Water) - Future Projects ' ? 5 50 $ 50 ; so $ 50 $ 50 -'. $ 250 requirements of the masterwater plan in Cases where the Y (22r[ developer is not required to provide the ultimate size of the line to serve hislher development. r( €:� Partial funding for the construction of a wafer supply line far 2 `Water Supply Line (24 ") serving TW King Pump Station #2 (Companion) $ 1,000 �{ 5 - $ - $ - $ S $ 1,000 Pump Station # 2. Remainder of funding for this pro}ect will be from the utility fund, Totals: $ 1,050 $ s0 $ s0 ; 50 $ 50 ; - $ 1,250 1 Roadway Impact Funds vements R €F SA 1 General Capacity Impro 957 $ - $ - $ - $ 5 : S 157 Funding forwe study recommendation, design and constructi on of general - ca ar: hin Road a SsMoo Am, 1. Developer Reimbursement - Paving Improvements for Shops of Southlake (N Carroll Ave) SA 7 4 f � v $ 370 $ - $ - $ .. $ 5.` S 370 Funding for paving improvements associated with the $hops of 2 a , s, ilti Southlake development, r3�z3 f}' $ _ $ S 850 Funding farts City of Southlake fund match for the FM 1938 3 PM 1938 and FM 1709 Intersection Improvements SA 317 (COG Bottleneck Matching Funds} $ 880 t� $ - $ - S - and PM 7709 Intersection imp rovement. Funding forthe 24% of the City's 50 match to the Tarrant z� L - County Bond Elaefron for paving and drainage for the widening 4 { Street Widening - N White Chapel Blvd from Emerald Blvd to Highland St SA31 S of $ 1 060 $ - S - $ $ 1,060 of N. White Chapel to its ultimate pavement section (4 lanes divided). Remaining match is 21% Tram the general fund and 5% from the utility fiend. si r� €g h ZL { Funding represents 54% funding for the design and construction 5 \t Intersection Improvement- Cove Rd and N Carroll Ave (Roundabout) SA2 (C0 200 $ - $ - $ - 5 S ". ; 2e0 of a roundabout at the Dove Rd and Carroll Ave intersection. )., Remaining 50% fundin in the general fund 6 jti11sz S nterseeticn Improvement -Dove Rd and N White chapel Blvd (Roandahouq 5A2 j) $ 309 Companion) ^ty i t s S _ S - $ _ g - g: ; 390 Funding represents 75% funding for the design and construction of a roundabout of the Cove Rd and White Chapel Blvd Iniereaction. Remaining 25 % funding in the general fund. � _ �1 - Funding represents 50 %funding for the design and construction rL�� of a roundabout at the Contlnental Blvd and White Chapel Blvd 7 Intersection Improvement - Continental blvd and N White Chapei Blvd (Roundahout) $ 150 5 - $ - $ - $ $. $ 150 intersection. Remaining 50% funding in the general fund. Fu 4 to rng kwood (`.%' future Ki r f Exten on to its u €timate pa eme t ecttion 8 Street Widening - N Kimball Ave from SH 114 t0 future Kirkwood Extension SA s�_ _ $ - $ - $ 434 $ - $ - $ - - $ 430 lanes divided). Additional funding provided from the general ilk } }3' fund. Ni Funding for the widening of Brumlow from Continental Blvd to 9 street Widening - Smmlow from Continental Blvd to SH 26 SAS (Compani $ - $ - $ - $ $'; Soo S 500 SH26 to its ultimate pavement section (4 lanes divided). Additional funding provided from the general fund. tat,: $ 2,897 ; - $ 430 $ - $ - $ Soo ; 3,827 Strategic Initiative Funds fv Funding forthe acquisition of a fire service ladder truck. truck 9 Fire Service Ladder Truck $ 1,440 $ - 5 - $ S.' r S 1,400 required to provide adequate fire semce to mu€it level buildings located In Town Square and surrounding areas. General funding fur cons truction of sidewalks at various 1 Citywide SidewalklTrail Improvements € i z $ 200 A s v $ 244 $ 260 $ 240 $ 200 $` �- $ 1,ato locations recommended b staff and a roved b Ci Council. 300 Funding represents the cost of the design work for the extension Cesi n of ExtensioisltiL'E_ n of N. Kimball from SH114 North $ 9 aiaO��,��T of N. Kimball North 0 pmjeet Name Prior FY2007 PY2008 FY2009 FY2011a FY2011 Beyond Total Description �10 Funding represents 50% funding for the design and construction 2 Yy +Intersection Impmvement - Dove Rd and N canon Ave (Roundabout) $ 200 $ - $ - $ - $ S ' ; 240 of a roundabout at the Dove Rd and Carrolk Ave intersection. y 5�3 Remaining 50% funding in the Roadway Impact Fee fund. dC t� Egr1i(z ;; Funding represents 25% funding for the design and construction of a roundabout at the Dove Rd and White Chapel Blvd 3 +Intersection Improvement- Dove Rd and N White Chapel Blvd (Roundabout)! `� $ 100 is $ - $ - $ - S $ ". S 100 intersection. Remaining 75% funding in the Roadway Impact Fee fund. Totals: $ 2,200 $ zoo ; 200 ; 200 ; 200 $ - ; 1,720 General Fund kh�: �` 500 Reimbursement for construction of Central Park in the Shops of 1 central Park - Cansfruc0an Reimbursement ?q\ $ 604 $ - $ - $ _ $ - S. $ Southlaka development. # t` r, '1 - Funding far 3 additional feet of the 8' sidewalk along FM 1938 Original funding 2 +Intersection Improvement - FM 1938 and FM 1709 (COG Bottleneck Matching Funds) - 11 j� $ 25 $ _ $ $ $ $� ! $ 25 from FM 1709 to Johnson Rd. project pmvide5 Side walk t,E�C',r�i, for only a 5' sidewalk. Remaining finding for the intersection a re E l improvements are in the Roadway Imp act Fee fund. t1 E _,. -} 2 General funding for Citywide pavement rehabilitation as l recommended by the Pavement Management Application, an 3 Street Rehabilitation Required by Pavement Manegemeni Application 5 1,200 3 1,204 $ 1,2411 $ 1.200 $ 3200 $ - $ 9,110 infrastructure management software designed by Slantec. The software a pavement quality report which is field generates verified and used to develop street listings for the project each A�'?t�� ear. Yi) Funding for the 21 % of the City's 50% match to the Tarrant County Bond Election for paving and drainage for the widening 5 +Street Mitering N VVhlte Chapel Blvd from Emerald Blvd to Highland St $ quo $ - $ - $ - $ 3i - $ 1,035 of N. White Chapel to its ultimate pavement section {4 lanes z divided). Remaining match is 24% from the Roadway Impart Fee fund and 5% from the utilit y fund. = €3 �_� ,ir 3 S, ; 315 Funding for the construction of an 8' trail along the north side of 6 Trail Improvements -East Dove E$ -= $ 315 $ - $ - $ - $ - Dove Rd from Waite Chapel Blvd to Carroll Middle School. Funding for the imp lementation of design recommendations 7 Urban Design Implementation $ 500 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 $� _ ; 1 259 from the Urban Design Stud y. t _ �qZ� Funding for median enhancement along FM 171791hroughout its FM 1709 Median Enhancements $ ,t " } - -) $ - $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 S1 >. $ 800 entire tenth with the City of Souhtlaka including landscaping, ii and mescellaneeus hardsca ing. Funding for the widening of Kimball Ave from SH 114 to the III future Kirkwood Extension to its ultimate pavement section (4 +street Widening - N Kimball Ave Rom SH 114 to fuhrre Kirkwood Extension i -(� $ - lanes divided). Additional funding provided from the Roadway ZC s?'Ey . _.._.......... � Impact Fee fund. zvd '�i �jy�, ' $ $ 5 395 $ 396 Fundln for the construction of an S' trail along Peytonville Ave g con Trail Improvements along N Feytenvlle, from Dove Rd to Southddge Lakes - iy }z - �Z - from Dove Rd to Southrid a Lakes. i `Li y " s 340 $ 300 Funding for the construction of an 8' trail along Shady Oaks Dr 12 Trail Improvements along shady oaks Or from Convenky to bicentennial Park 5 - $ - $ - $ - ,$ from Covent to Bicentennial Park. lZ ti; Funding for the construction of an 8' trail infiili along Continental 13 Trail Impravemants along Continental Blvd lntill to 10mball Ave 'r $ - $ - $ - $ 380 $ - $ $ 380 Blvd to Kimball Ave. Funding to construct approximately 1,606 LF of sound wall 15 FM 1938 Sound Wall '3 �� }'a $ $ - ; - $ 395 $ - $' -- $ 356 along the Moslem boudary of Myers Meadows subdivision ,�UY12�1rniz" adjacent to the future FM 1938. Funding for the improvement of the Pearson Lin at FM1769 intersection to its ultimate section. Cost estimate includes the 16 Intersection Improvement - TMB Proposition 1, Pearson Ln @ FM 1709) ;.'�} $ - $ - $ - $ - S 1,620 5: - $ 1s20 burial of overhead uliiihes and extension of the reinforced concrete box on the western boundary of the lot on the north z east comer of the intersection. l2 3t Funding for the widening of Brumlow from Continental Blvd to ) 3 $ 2076. S 2 076 Tona€ 17 -Street Widening - Brumlow from Canilnental Blvd to SH 26 4t � 1 C l $ - $ - $ - $ - , Add funding ng from the Roadway m pactFee fund, # Project Name i i Prior FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 Beyond Total Description Funding for the widening of Carroll Ave from Breezeway to 18 Street Widanin south Carroll Ave tom Breezewa to FM 17119 $ - g y \k� $ - $ - $ - $ ffii 3, +'fit; S 3,510 FM1709 to its ultimate pavement section (4 lanes divided . iv, i1 Funding to implement study recommendations for a Citywide 19 ciNwiae service ranter Improvements $ $ - $ - $ - $ $ 1 2110: 1 S ,200 Service Center to be utilized for maintenance personnel offices, and equipment and material storage. , $ - $ - § Funding forthe construction of a pedestrian crossing between 20 1709 Pedestrian Bridge Southlake Town Square and the Shops of Southlake. Totals; $ 1,040 $ 1,9001 it 3,301 $ 2,725 1 $ 3,210 $ 7,786 § 15,466 Utility Fund Partial funding for the construction of a water supply line for 1 Water Supply Line (24 ") serving TW King Pump Station #2 �,y < 0. $ 2276 $ 2,504 3 - $ - $ § i $ 3,480 Pump Station # 2. Remainder of funding for this project will be 3 ,kS from the water impact fee fund and future years in utility fund. VIN{'. Funding for construction of an 8" sanitary sewer line along � _: $ 146 Pearson Lnfrom Gran Ln to Johnson Rd. Project will eliminate 2 sewer Line (8'� along N Pearson tram Gray Ln to Johnson Rd {{ix $ �53}'t3 $ - $ $` the need for operations to pump out an existing dry line on a S 1lfa,z�,e weekly basis. cr1r meter station imp Funding required tv construct rovements and l $ $ $ - $ S -' $ 200 analyze a portion fire sewer cu within the Westlake 3 N -1 Sewer An al sis and Meter Station Improvements for TRA Turnover 1iit $ 200 Y t�tt {�U�1<%� - - m T city limits. The wont is necessary to meet RA conditions of rl ec reement to assume ownership of the line. Funding for meter modifications at Fort Worth wholesale meter 4 City of Fort Worth Wholesale Meter Modifications t 4'4Q+ 5 194 $ - $ - $ - $ S: $ 344 locations required for the City of Fort Worth to assume direct billing to the City of Keller forwatersupply. 3t `? Funding for the 5% of the City's 50941, match to the Tarrant '3'` County Bond Election for paving and drainage for the widening 5 �( € Utility Imp. for Street Widening - N White Chapel Blvd (Emerald to Highland) (C }1 $ 225 S - $ - 5 - 5 $' S 225 of N. White Chapel to its ultimate pavement section (4 lanes divided). Remaining match is 21% fmm the general fund and 24% from the roadway impact fee fund. r� t `},mss Funding for repainting of the Pearson Pump Station Ground 6 Pearson Ground Storage Tanks Repainting (Exterior Tank 1 1lnterior Tank 2) ;$�( 620 S - 5 - $ - $ § !: $ 620 Stoma Tanks Exterior of Tank 111nterlor of Tank 2 "} t' J $ - $ z,t2s $ - $ 5- S 2,x31 Footling for constructi on of sewer to serve Heatherwood, Royal 7 Se1rer Line (e $ - NSP Heathenaood, Royal Oaks, and Thin Creeks �< ,3E Oaks and Twin Creeks with sanitary sewer. k t'j4 i Funding for construction of an 8" sanitary sewer line along 8 1235.3 i Sewer Line (e') along Shady Oaks from north of the irasjn line to Fox Hcllov y . i $ - $ 337 $ 337 Shady Oaks from north of the basin line t0 Fox Hollow. Cum letion of the line will eimmiate the Corl lift station. Funding for construction of 20" trasmisawn main along SH 114 9 Water Main (201 along SH 114 from Tavm Square to N Ml e, Chapel Blvd ��? STq s - $ - 5 - $ 1,970 $ § - i $ 2,044 from Town Square to White Chapel Blvd. The 24" water supply main should be completed before construction of this line. Funding for construction of 12" water line along Dove Rd from 10 water tine (1 7) along B Dove Rd from N Carroll Ave to N Kimball Ave $ $ - $ 600 $ - $ S ;; $ 600 Carroll Ave to Kimball Ave. This portion of line is incuded in the Z \S'i33 ?Yi�i master water concept plan. Funding for construction of 12" water line along along Highland 17 " 4 Water Une (1 2') along E Highland St from N calms Ave to N Kimball Ave €( tz 610 $ - $ S $ s1a 51 from Carroll Ave to Kimball Ave. This portion of line is - y' <rae1 included in the master water concept plan. €zo Fund n uredto 1 increas l ewaterFlOw l and o 12 )p,ggg Water Line (8') crass - country from SH 114 to Rainfareet Ct ; - $ _ $ - $ 131 $ .y ; 151 Workcreq :t r e ssure to the area served. Funding for construction of an 8" waterline along Kimball Ave 13 1 €��j>; $ - Water Line {B ") along N Kimball Ave from Dove Rd to City limit line `i ' 5 1 1 $ - $ - $ 140 S S = ; 140 from Dove Rd to the northern city limit line. Work necessary to rovide ade uate fire protection along Kimball Ave. I Funding for construction of 12" water line along Paylonvill Ave bet € 23 - v 5311 $. $ 675 from FM1709 to Raven Bend Gt, Work required to eliminate 14 Water Line (12 ") along N Peytonvile hum FM 1708 to Raven Bend Ct (t{gh Pressure Pi a ) ti¢i _ $ $ - $ - $ $ . dead - end lines on the boundary of the high pressure plane_ s�.��ia�f . ...... ...... This voTtion of line is included In the master water concept irl an. y Project Nan* Prior FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2tl70 FY2011 Beyond Total Description > �ittc _ Funding for construction of 12" water line along along Bob 1 5 Wall Line HT) along Mob Jones Rd ham TW King Rd to N While Chapel Blvd [ ;�ifU° ` 5 - $ - $ - $ 165 $ $>: - • S 165 Janes Rd from TV'! King Rd to Wh Chapel Blvd. This portion of line is included in the master water concept plan. i Funding for construction of 12" water line along Shady Oaks Dr 16 Water Line (12') along Shady Oaks Dr from Highland St to W dove Rd c $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 742 3: $ 7e6 from Highland St to Dove Rd. This portion of line is included in the master water concept plarr � zs6 Funding for construction of 12" waterline along Dove Rd and Carroll Ave from Estes Park Blvd to Woodland Park Dr. This 17 Water Line {12 ") along Dove and Carroll from Estes Park Hlvd to Woodland Pa t t� � $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 230 S S §a .ura ortion of line is included in the masterwater cone f Ian. Funding forconstructi0n of and 8" waterline along Highland St s €z�� t ;l 1t€ from Shady Oaks Dr to SH114. Work is required to replace an Water Line (3'ry along Highland from Shady oaks Dr to BHi tot {�L $ - $ - $ - $ $ 297 $� "I S 297 existing, undersized 6" line that is aging and badly in need of repair. [20 Water Line (8 ") mr a -ling existing lines at Lake odBumay Ln and Palo CurolLonesome }§ ' - $ 84 $ti -� $ a4 Funding for construction of an 8" water line to connect existing Dove � c $ lines at Lake DrfBume Ln and Palo DurolLonesome Dove. j Funding for construction of an 8" water line along PeytonAll Ave Water Line (8 ") along N Peytonville (Low Pressure Plane) a� Ut z $ - nth $ - $ - $ - $ ash ,S $ 450 from FM1709 to Woodbrook Ln. Work required to eliminate dead -end lines on the boundary of the low pressure Plane. u[E'�'. s'} �' 160 F and 8" sewer fine along Shady Oaks unding for construcSon of 21 Sewer Lute (5') along Shady Oaks from 500' south o1 Love Henry GI to 400' north of FM 1749 $ I fa § � $ - $ fr011'1 569' ShPnth Of Love hen C1 to 400' north of FM"E709. Totak: S 3,620 $ 3,141 $ 3,338 S 2,936 $ 1,953 $ - $ 15,969 SPDC Fund $ 1 Matrhirg Funds t $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $` 200 $ 1,600 2 Bob Janes Nature Center I ° S)x }1j $ 552 $ - $ - $ - $ i= ti: $ 622 3 Noble Oaks Park Improvements aS4h ;vin?; $ - $ 163 $ - S - $ ICI = $ 263 4 Bicentennial West Lighted Fields rt4;:? $ - $ 1,330 $ - S - $ -'. $ 1,330 5 Koalaty Park Improvements ",L,l.a�` $ - $ 99 S - $ - $ `$- $ 9e B Chesapeake Park Improvements 'L $ $ 145 $ - $ - $ = $ 145 7 BMX Bicycle Facility $ - $ 73 $ -. -' S 73 S Skate Park e }�-�` }'`°S $ 5 108 $ - $ - $ %�$:... __ _ g -, $ 108 9 Coker Hike l Bike Trailhead $ - $ - $ - S 8o $ - T777 $ 80 10 Kirkwood I Sabre Linear Park $t il� ` r'a' $ - $ - $ - $ 266 $ - r' S 266 11 Bob Janes Park - North Playground Cover .............t vvr',` $ - $ 90 $ - $ - $ 90 12 Bob Jones Park- North Playground Rubbedzed Surfacing 87 $ - $ - $ - d'., _.... __,. S 07 13 Bicentennial West Dmnage Retention Pond $ - $ 270 $ - $ - $ - $: 'I $ 270 14 Bicentennial - Adventure Alley Replacemerts and Improvements r,S;;1 $ - $ 702 $ - $ - $ - ' #S'... $ 102 15 Farhat Property Development Jj,§`;,�,`i - ��i}e $ - S $ - $ 358 5 16 Parks Maintenance Facility 'a $ - S - $ - $ 678 $ 678 17 Community Services OM iL4i$g2S "a€ $ - $ 303 303 18 Beenlennial East Drainage Improvements $ - $ 19 Bob Jones Park- Parking Lot Over" (soccerfields) k ,.. ? $ - $ - 5 - $ 130 S '$ ; $ 130 2g In -Line Hockey Rink Shade Covering t$� S - $ - $ - $ 302 $ $ ,` $ 302 21 Recreation center $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $,= 1¢,AO9i $ 18,000 Totals: $ 752 $ 3,285 $ 200 $ 2,014 $ 200 S 18,200 $ 25,221 cdme Central 1 Town Square Video Snrveillance 3'&"u= S 300 $ 350 I! $ 650 DPS East Facility 4`t 4�i` =sa; $ 7.490 $ 8,964 f. $ 16,464 3 Ncdh CPS Facility a9'€ iv -� $ 192 i $ 192 4 DP3 West Reconfiguratien 2 - .,`3ti S 2 000 �> Totals: $ 7,790 $ 9,314 $ 192 $ - $ 2,000 S - $ 17,296 SCHEDULE OF UNFUNDED NEEDS FY2006 -07 TOTAL D EPARTMENTID IVI SION ITEM PERSONNEL OPERATI CAPITAL AMOUNT GENERALFUND 900- GENERAL GOVERNMENT 100 -City Secretary/Mayor, City Council None $.. $ $ $ - TOTAL 102 -Human Resources Hr Generalist $ 44,949 $ - $ $ 44,949 Fireproof Lateral File Cabinet $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Computer Kiosk for Applicants $ 1,060 $ 1,000 TOTAL $ `' 44,949.: 5;000 $'`:. $. 49 ; 949 103 -City Manager's OfficE None $ $ _ .. $, $ TOTAL .; ,.. 105 - Support Services Network Servers $ $ $ 14,000 $ 14,000 Granicus Streaming Video $ 16,500 $ 16,500 Editing Computers for DVDs $ 17,500 $ 17,500 Desktop Standard Policy Maker $ 9,300 $ 9,300 Help Desk Software $ 9,500 $ 9,500 Update existing Cable Channel $ 88,000 $ 88,000 Miscellaneous Software /Additional Licenses $ 9,000 $ 9,000 PDF Generator Elements $ 3,264 $ 3,264 Desktop Computers for unfunded new personnel $ 4,20D $ 4,200 Laptop Computers $ 3,400 $ 3,400 Ruggedized Laptops $ 28,000 $ 28,000 Ftr Reporter Desks $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Wireless Coverage Shops at Southlake $ 9,000 $ 9,000 Projectors $ 3,400 $ 3,400 Zoning Analyst for ArcGis $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Sharepoint Portal Updates $ 52,000 $ 52,000 Toch - screen Directory for Town Hail $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Hydraulic Lift $ 14,000 $ 14,000 TOTAL $'' $ {17,264 $'-- 193,840 ;':$ 311 : , 064: 106- FINANCE 106- Finance Shredder $ $ 3,OOD $ $ 3,000 Credit Card Fees $ 22.000 $ 22,000 $ 25,000 $' 25;040 107 - Municipal Courl Work Station Archive Room $ $ 3,500 $ $ TOTAL $ ` -_ i $ 3,500 108 -Teen Court None $ $ $ TOTAL $:> $ $' $. 130 - PUBLIC SAFETY 131 -Fire Services Outfitting Reserve Engine $ $ $ 46,610 $ 46,610 TOTAL..:.:..::' $ $ $ 46,610'i.$ 46,610,: 132 - Police Services Ivestigations Aide $ 44,939 $ $ $ 44,939 Detention Officers (5) $ 182,990 $ $ $ 192,990 Uniform - allowance upgrade $ 29,160 $ 29,160 Car Wash Contract $ 15,600 $ ......................... 15,600 TOTAi 237;929 $ 44,760 $' . . - $ 282,689 133 - Public Safety Support Emergency Phones for DPS Facilities $ $ 4,500 $ $ 4,500 Code fled Emergency Warning $ 14,000 $ 14,000 TOTAL $:' - :` $ 4,500 14,00Q. $ 18,500.` 142- Building Inspections None $ $ $ TOTAL $! $ $ $ SCHEDULE OF UNFUNDED NEEDS FY2006 -07 TOTAL DEPARTMENT /D €VISION ITEM PERSONNEL OPERATIONS CAPITAL AMOUNT 140- PUBLIC WORKS 144 - Streets and Drainage Gradall $ $ - $ 220,000 $ 220,000 Street Sweeping Contract $ $ 120,000 $ - $ 120,000 TOTAL $ [: - ' $ 170,000. <$:220,000 $ 340. ;000 >, 146 - Public Works Admin. Storn Water Utility Engineer $ 72,216 $ - $ $ 72,216 New Cubicle $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Microsoft Office Project Software $ 1,360 $ 1,360 Filing Cabinets $ 609 $ 609 Intern $ 15,091 $ $ $ 15,091 TQT:AL $ ; ` 87,307 '$ 1.,969 S <' 4 ; S 93, 76: 150 - PLANNING 150 - Planning GPS /GIS Technician $ 40,696 $ $ $ 40,696 TOTAL $ 40,696. $ . $ $ 40,•696;. 151- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 159 - Economic Development None $ 7 $ . _ $. - TOTAL 160- COMMUNITY SERVICES 161 - Community Services Assistant to the Director of Community Services $ 54,616 $ $ $ 54,616 Office Assistant - Senior Center $ 29,299 $ 29,299 Audio System $ - $ $ 4,000 $ 4,000 TOTAL: .. $. 83;915 $ $:?;. 4,000.:'.;$ 8791:5.,` 162 -Parks and Recreation Parks Superintendent $ 63,584 $ $ $ 63,584 Septic System Replacement at Sports Complex $ 16,000 $ 16,000 Management Analyst $ 52,723 $ 52,723 Recreation Specialist (part -time) $ 7,930 $ 7,930 IrrigationlAtheltic Fieid Lighting Management Systerr $ 65,000 $ 65,000 Parks Superintendent $ 47,397 $ $ - $ 47,397 TOTAL 171;634 $ $' :61;000 ?$ 252;634' 164- Library Services Technical Services Librarian $ 53,419 $ 53,419 Library Clerk (part -time) $.... ...5 690 TOTAL.... $ : ' .59, 1:09 $ $ :.' $ 5. 9..109` GRAND TOTAL. GENERAL FUN13 $ ; 725;639. $ 321,993.:.:$ 563,410: :$ 1,60.7;442'. UTILITY FUND 141 - Utility Biting None $ $ $ $ TOTAL $ -.: $ $:. - 147 -Water Utilities Croasconnection Control software $ $ $ 6,000 $ 6,000 TOTAL $ _!? $ - $ 6,000 $ 6.,00.0, 148- Wastewater Utilities Pan & Tilt Camera Kit $ $ $ 75,000 $ 75,000 Tracking Grease Interceptor software $ 6,000 $ 6,000 TOTAL' $ . 81,D00 ::$ 81;000?' GRANDTOTAL'UTILITY:FUND $! $. $.: 87,000;;$ 87,000! TOTAL ALL'FUNDS $ !` 726,539 $ ": 321,993 $ 650,410 ' $ 1,694,442:. Follow -up to Budget Work Session with the City Council on August 22, 2006 Q uestion Director 7 ',. t Cam` C..C l _ >�y� � ��v��?n�. �u: ✓'�y~a�fi� �, " What is the impact of the compensation plan Increase in cost would be approximately Sharen on the budget in the next 3 -5 ears? $76,335- $127,225 in the next 3 -5 years. Jackson What is the turn over rate for last 5 years, and Please see appendix i — Turnover rates Kevin what are the reasons for the turn over? Hu man Can you tell us if another code enforcement Analysis of current workload indicators and Robert Finn officer is warranted? Please provide workload statistical data reveals that an additional indicators for current code enforcement Code Enforcement Officer is not warranted officers? at this time. Currently the workload is around 83 cases per month and is handled by three Code Enforcement Officers. Please see appendix ii — Chief Finn Memo Can we talk about ongoing funding issues of Will coordinate with Director Rick Smith Steve Polasek the SRO program at the next Joint Use and Chief Goolsby for placement on Committee meeting? upcoming JUC agenda. - :„k .� v'v' U`e'\�, � P f. `.3�^^.ys'�,� a° er�S„ - r ��}✓°"�, " -'^�3" 4 v5 ' ' ".g ✓ I �� 3 � � & � [ " "h '.y.. J`�5''�. _.,- .;"'r;r�"_S 'i. ';`.? � � rb , '�^"�,J `+x ' �"�' ✓'3 a�� What exactly is the purpose of the sewer The Texas Commission on Environmental Bob Price evaluation study that you are proposing? Quality has made it known through several regional meetings that they have initiated a prograan to bring all sewer collection systems into a compliance program to eliminate sanitary sere discharges. City's may enter into this program voluntarily or wait for notice requiring compliance. Staff strongly believes that there is a substantial benefit to the City in entering into this program voluntarily. Doing so not only allows the city to adequately fund the program but will give the city greater control of the scope and structure of the program. In addition, an evaluation of the Denton Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant indicates that approximately 25% of the flow to the TRA Denton Creek Plant is due to Inflow and Infiltration. This means that the costs for services provided by the Denton Creek system will be reduced, by as much as 25% by improvements initiated by this project. Are there any funds available to improve the Long term to be addressed as part of Urban Bob Price, aesthetics of SH 114? (For example picking up Design Study maintenance assessment. In Steve Polasek the litter.) the interim will explore opportunities through a variety of means to include, but not limited to, KSB assistance and landscape contract. Has there been any thought to installing a According to the Southlake 2025 Bob Price round about at the White Chapel /Highland recommendations, the following was intersection? recommended: 1. Conduct a study for moving traffic efficiently and safely on White Chapel from F.M. 1709 to Dove with the ultimate decision on the roadway cross section depending upon the outcome of this study. No roundabout is recommended if the roadway is proposed to be widened. if widened, then the recommendation is to change the designation from a 5 -lane undivided facility to a 4 -lane divided facility from Dove Street to F.M. 1709 to eliminate the stacking of south- bound traffic on S.H. 114 during the PM peak on the Master Thoroughfare Plan and a corresponding CIP request. 2. Amended MTP based on results. 3. Submit CIP request. Why is the storm water utility not addressed in The Stormwater Utility will be presented to Bob Price the proposed budget? the City Council in a workshop on September 5, 2006. The Stormwater utility will be a separate enterprise fund and will stand on its own. As Council has not yet authorized the Stormwater Utility, nothing in the General Fund budget addresses it. s" we �s�= ✓�'''",' a � r:;. v C �„ i r ?. � e >2. - s,,,t"' � i" '':-. t , - ,: ';... - � � x..,c.;r�"�..�2�-� '�; . Can we get more detail on the restrictions of Regarding the transportation components Greg Last the use of HOT funds? we have an opinion from our City Attorney and a verbal confirmation from the Attorney that runs the Texas Hotel and Lodging Association that those components are not authorized expenditures under the tax code. Please see appendix iii - section 35 1. 101 "Use of Tax Revenue" of the Tax Code related to Local Hotel Occupancy Taxes. Can you provide us a list of uses other cities Please see appendix iv -- HOT Funds Sharen are using HOT funds for? Survey Jackson �.r �v -^,;v , a �� ,.. ,^�, :�°°� � 1�:�"`"�..«'^�" �r'�°vti� �"`Z""":;"'-S✓ . ✓ 1 �m'd,..,s' u�� "` � ' � I �, � l � ,�"�7 G, L = Y id_". .� �� ,„.,��Cs,� .r'w��,�$� .,.,a ` i',� S =V, i _ F t� �.n E - F �i '��[ � F t...,.. r. " �.��. �.�.y��'�� . �.�'5..�"'!'`�K''.��, '; � ^ �`"t"^��w' r � x„c��..�._ _�.- ,. "...... ,a_. .,rC '�... _, -,.,. ,.. � ,...t�n,+5'�,:*M -, /.�. �,a,n...- � �a,, '" .,.:l,L. ., ✓,.n..' .u✓.....,s.::. _. :�� .. :�ti?�.v �� -., ,,�u�n Can you provide us with a programming plan Currently being developed in conjunction Steve Polasek or revenue estimates for the Nature Center? with Bob Jones Nature Center to include operating plan and revised Community Services Agreement. Can you find out what the impact of the school We are currently in communications with Steve Polasek district closing Durham Elementary next CISD Administrators and they have summer will have on community services indicated their intentions to work with the p rogramming? City to locate alternative facilities. Do we need to add funds to the Sister Cities Will continue to monitor based on input Steve Polasek Program based on any anticipated changes for from Sister Cities Board with ability to the upcoming year? request as mid -year adjustment if needed. Can we have more details on the funding Safety Town plans currently under Steve Polasek recommendations for safety town? development to include estimated costs for construction. This information will be included in the overall Bicentennial Park Schematic plans currently being developed. Safety programs will be conducted by the Southlake DPS Citizens Association. City would be responsible for general facility maintenance. Can you address the outdoor sound system for Will review in the upcoming fiscal year as it Steve Polasek special events? relates to hard wired microphones and improved sound quality. .,� _;:�F"`�v - 'n ' S, i - � �'�'- c I p r� � r �' �"�"My�Y,�.x� ��x '{', '; w°,. zs- �"� `"� > ' ..:T.'^""x M � Can you give us some more detail on all the Uses & Applications Wade uses you anticipate for the special event • Special Events Goolsby, platform? • Specific crime trends (BMVs, Rick Smith Criminal Mischief, etc) + VIP/ Dignitary protection • Parking lot security • Crowd control + School events • Emergency operations + Outdoor events (Town Square, parks, etc ) Depending on the situation, the Observation Platform can either be manned with either police officers or volunteers, or unmanned. The mere presence can be a deterrent to crime while the manned operation provides coordination abilities, surveillance, and added police presence. Can you tell us if another code enforcement Analysis of current workload indicators and Robert Finn officer is warranted? Please provide workload statistical data reveals that an additional indicators for current code enforcement Code Enforcement Officer is not warranted officers? at this time. Currently the workload is around 83 cases per month and is handled by three Code Enforcement Officers. Please see appendix- memo Can we talk about ongoing funding issues of Will coordinate with Director Rick Smith Steve Polasek the SRO program at the next Joint Use and Chief Goolsby for placement on Committee meeting? upcoming JUC agenda. _ a - �:,r „- Yy..,,u,'.�. --, ��v . ... - ''- .. �`�`��"?� . f,�"�� vy,�„ 1 �,�e y�-�'� 1 s� y= '� � �"'��'� ' �,�=c x , ,, -: a �.�' v �",.:.� ' y 7” � 9�> r'" ,.. n.• _ `'�' r "' `� '"` �r`.1, �� Can you let us know how you propose creating We will meet with each of the Council Jim Blagg a legislative agenda for the city, and what that members to determine any specific issues timeline is? that they are aware of in the upcoming legislative session; work with other cities to determine issues of mutual concern; and, work with the firm in Austin that we are likely to engage to assist us with legislative issues, assist with the final legislative agenda recommendations, assist with drafting any bills that we might want and help identify a sponsor. The legislative agenda will be ready for Council consideration at the 17 October Council Meeting. Pre - filing for the 80 Legislature beg ins 13 November 2006. It seems like the microphones in the Council The council indicated during the discussion Gary Gregg Chambers do not do a very good job. Do you that they did not want to wear lavaliere need to replace those? microphones directly attached to their person. We will address the audio levels and see if they can be improved on the to e. In the future as new projects are presented can Projected maintenance and operating costs Bob Price, you present the multi -year pro -forma for those included within CIP worksheets, as well as Steve Polasek, projects (i.e. revenue generation, annual general revenue estimation. Rick Smith maintenance and operating costs, etc.)? Appendix I - Turnover Rates Voluntary Turnover Rate 25.00% r a w c 20.00 0 /0 °? 1 55.00 % e a. s ` y �� •�� x rt 10.00 %az 5.00 % 0.00% FY 01 -02* FY 02 -03* FY 03 -04 FY 04 -05 FY 05 -06 YTD Fiscal Year F t: FT Voluntary Turnover Rate Total Voluntary Turnover Rate FY05 -06 Reasons for Termination: Pay / Benefits 4 Better Career Opportunities 6 Move 5 Retire 2 r 10 Total voluntary: 27 FT FTEs (Full Time Equivalents)! 218; 234; 249' 258 262 PTFTEs - 15E 15 . _...... 17; _... _.... 233; �_..., 22.5: Total FTEs 3 233 ; 249 266 .._.... 281.3 1 - .... 284.5 _, _...._. _...._.,...._�...... _.�- . .......... ...... -... _. �,.... _..._ ..�_,.�. ._.. e._ .. �.,__.�_ .v_J__,..,� ..._.., _....._.. . ... .,.. FT Voluntary Turnover 33 423 25 30 27 u..._. __.__..__ _ PT Voluntary Turnover 12 1 9' 11 _ ._ 9 5.5 FTNon- Volunta Turn over 3 61 33 6j ... 7'; 6 . _� ... _... _ ................_._.._..__._._..._._ .- _......_._..__.._._._.__.._ _.._._..__._._._._... I PT Non- Voluntary Turnover� ............. 0; 0 z 01 0.5 1 0.5 Total Turnover, _- -. ___..... ._.__._FT Voluntary Turnover Rate; Tumover 511 . __- .- .____..._... 15.14%1 u _ .-_ 54, 17.95%1 42lk ;. 10.04 %� 46.51 11.63 %j 39 10.31 %1 PT Voluntary Rate, Total Voluntary Turnover Rate' - ...._.- ..._..__.______._ FTNon- VoluntaryTurnoverlkatel 80.00 19.31 20,48 2.75 %; 60.00 %j 1.28 %1 64.71%1 l3 53 %I 2.41W 38. 63% 1 ! 13 86% 2.71 24.44 1142 %I 2.29 %1 __.._.__._ . ___._..__._._.__- ..... _..... _____......_ PT Non Volunta Turnover Rate __._.._..__._._.-_.._._..._..._;__._._.._._..._._._.:..___.._. ° 0 00 %' / °l 0 00° 0.00 %1 __.__..._....__;...___.....__.. 2.15% _ ... ... .._. 2.22 % __..___.... ............._......_.. �..__. �.__._._.w Total Non Voluntary Turnover Rate . 2 58% 1.20%] 2 26% _. 2 67% �....- 2 28% v...__.i ---------------------- ------ _._.__ .__..___ Total T _._..._____..__.._.. -_. urnover Rafe• . -. ° .� ..............9% 15.79 /°; ° - -.- -.-_ -.� . 16 53 %1 13.71 % *Assumed 15 part -time FTEs for FY 01 -02 & FY 02 -03. Voluntary Turnover Rate 25.00% r a w c 20.00 0 /0 °? 1 55.00 % e a. s ` y �� •�� x rt 10.00 %az 5.00 % 0.00% FY 01 -02* FY 02 -03* FY 03 -04 FY 04 -05 FY 05 -06 YTD Fiscal Year F t: FT Voluntary Turnover Rate Total Voluntary Turnover Rate FY05 -06 Reasons for Termination: Pay / Benefits 4 Better Career Opportunities 6 Move 5 Retire 2 Other / Unknown 10 Total voluntary: 27 Appendix ii MEMORANDUM August 29, 2006 TO: Shana Yelverton, City Manager FROM: Robert Finn, Chief of Fire Service SUBJECT: Budget Work Session- Code Enforcement Officer Purpose: The Department of Public Safety was asked to review workload data and other indicators to determine if an additional Code Enforcement Officer was needed. The purpose of this memorandum is to present information and data related to the addition of one Code Enforcement Officer. Summary: Currently the Department. of Public Safety has seven licensed Code Enforcement Officers. Three of the seven officers are full time Code Enforcement; one is the Landscape and Zoning inspector who helps enforce the sign and tree ordinances while two focus on all other code enforcement violations. Three building inspectors are also licensed code enforcement officers as is the Fire Inspector. At any given time the city has as many as seven code enforcement officers licensed and ready to perform code enforcement duties as needed. On average Code Enforcement handles 83 cases per month or about 4 cases per day. The workload is split between the two full time Code Enforcement Officers and the Landscape and Zoning Inspector. The City of Keller has two full time Code Enforcement Officers and one part time officer who is also the pool inspector. Currently Code Enforcement utilizes an after hours "Hot Line" to receive complaints and tips regarding violations. The Technical Services Department is setting up a full time "Hot Line" that citizens can utilize 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. To encourage citizen usage The "Hot Line" number will be advertised on the City's cable channel, Library plasma screens and the AM Radio. Recommendation: At this time the Department of Public Safety recommends that we continue with the current number of Code Enforcement Officers. The department will investigate the use of "Citizens on Patrol" to provide additional code enforcement support during busy times. RFlrk Appendix iv — HOT Funds Survey ■ Arts promotion- $140,000 ■ Tourism- $488,000 City of Lewisville ` Hotel /Convention Center- $250,000 ■ Special Events- $165,000 ■ Summer /Fall Music- $29,000 ■ Chamber Administration- $11,000 City of Allen ' Allocated according to Section 351 of Tax Code ■ County- 28.57% City of Conroe ■ Arts Commission- 15% 0 Chamber C &VB- 56.43% ■ Historical Society- 50% City of Mansfield ' Chamber of Commerce- 35% ■ Main St. Theater- 15% ■ Kiwanis /Rotas /Other- $6,000 City of Coppell ■ No hotels or motels City of Arlington ' Convention & Event Services- 77.8% ■ Stadium Venue Tax- 22.2% ■ Tourism- 16.7% City of Frisco ■ Convention centers, art, historical restoration- 83.3% North Richland Hills ■ Economic Development- 100% City of Carrollton ' Allocated according to Section 351 of Tax Code City of Watauga ■ No tax collected City of Hurst ' Arts- 15% ■ Festivals, events, other- 85 % ■ Rate- 7% Town of Addison ■ Arts- 15% M Other- 85% Appendix id TAX CODE - CHAPTER 351 SUBTITLED. LOCAL HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAXES CHAPTER 351. MUNICIPAL HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAXES SUBCHAPTER B. USE AND ALLOCATION OF REVENUE § 351.101. USE OF TAX REVENUE. (a) Revenue from the municipal hotel occupancy tax may be used only to promote tourism and the convention and hotel industry, and that use is limited to the following: (1) the acquisition of sites for and the construction, improvement, enlarging, equipping, repairing, operation, and maintenance of convention center facilities or visitor information centers, or both; (2) the furnishing of facilities, personnel, and materials for the registration of convention delegates or registrants; (3) advertising and conducting solicitations and promotional programs to attract tourists and convention delegates or registrants to the municipality or its vicinity; (4) the encouragement, promotion, improvement, and application of the arts, including instrumental and vocal music, dance, drama, folic art, creative writing, architecture, design and allied fields, painting, sculpture, photography, graphic and craft arts, motion pictures, radio, television, tape and sound recording, and other arts related to the presentation, performance, execution, and exhibition of these major art forms; (5) historical restoration and preservation projects or activities or advertising and conducting solicitations and promotional programs to encourage tourists and convention delegates to visit preserved historic sites or museums: (A) at or in the immediate vicinity of convention center facilities or visitor information centers; or (B) located elsewhere in the municipality or its vicinity that would be frequented by tourists and convention delegates; and (6) for a municipality located in a county with a population of 290,000 or less, expenses, including promotion expenses, directly related to a sporting event in which the majority of participants are tourists who substantially increase economic activity at hotels and motels within the municipality or its vicinity. (b) Revenue derived from the tax authorized by this chapter shall be expended in a manner directly enhancing and promoting tourism and the convention and hotel industry as permitted by Subsection (a). That revenue may not be used for the general revenue purposes or general govenunental operations of a municipality. (c) The governing body of a municipality by contract may delegate to a person, including another governmental entity or a private organization, the management or supervision of programs and activities funded with revenue from the tax authorized by this chapter. The governing body in writing shall approve in advance the annual budget of the person to which it delegates those functions and shall require the person to make periodic reports to the governing body at least quarterly listing the expenditures made by the person with revenue from the tax authorized by this chapter. The person must maintain revenue provided from the tax authorized by this chapter in a separate account established for that purpose and may not connmingle that revenue with any other money. The municipality may not delegate to any person the management or supervision of its convention and visitors programs and activities funded with revenue from the tax authorized by this chapter other than by contract as provided by this subsection. The approval by the governing body of the municipality of the annual budget of the person to whom the governing body delegates those functions creates a fiduciary duty in the person with respect to the revenue provided by the tax authorized by this chapter. (d) A person with whom a municipality contracts under this section to conduct an activity authorized by this section shall maintain complete and accurate financial records of each expenditure of hotel occupancy tax revenue made by the person and, on request of the governing body of the municipality or other person, shall make the records available for inspection and review to the governing body or other person. (e) Hotel occupancy tax revenue spent for a purpose authorized by this section may be spent for day -to -day operations, supplies, ,salaries, office rental, travel expenses, and other administrative costs only if those administrative costs are incurred directly in the promotion and servicing expenditures authorized under Section 351.101(a). If a municipal or other public or private entity that conducts an activity authorized under this section conducts other activities that are not authorized under this section, the portion of the total administrative costs of the entity for which hotel occupancy tax revenue may be used may not exceed the portion of those administrative costs actually incurred in conducting the authorized activities. (f) Municipal hotel occupancy tax revenue may not be spent for travel for a person to attend an event or conduct an activity the primary purpose of which is not directly related to the promotion of tourism and the convention and hotel industry or the performance of the person's job in an efficient and professional manner. (g) Nothing in this section shall prohibit any private entity, person, or organization from making subgrants by contract to any other person, entity, or private organization for expenditures under Section 351.101(x)(4). A subgrantee shall: (1) at least annually make periodic reports to the governing body of its expenditures from the tax authorized by this chapter; and (2) make records of these expenditures available for review to the governing body or other person. Added by Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 191, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987. Amended by Acts 1989, 71 st Leg., ch. 2, § 14.24(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989; Acts 1989, 71 st Leg., ch. 1110, § 4, eff. Oct. 1, 1989; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 680, § 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1993; Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 1027, § 1, eff. Aug. 28, 1995; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 755, § 1, eff. June 13, 2001; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1308, § 3, eff. June 16, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 209, § 90, eff. Oct. 1, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 303, § 1, eff. June 18, 2003.