/
     
Item 8BCity of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT March 3, 2006 CASE NO: ZA05 -169 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Johnson Place REQUEST: Zoning change and development plan on approximately 43.4 acres from "AG" Agricultural District and "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District to "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District. The plan proposes the development of 63 single family residential lots averaging 18,130 square feet, a gross residential density of 1.45 dwelling unit /acre and net density of 1.76 du /ac. There is 9.6 acres of open space (22% of the gross land area). Under the proposed "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development district the applicant proposes the following uses and regulations: This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the "SF -20A" Single Family Residential Zoning District and the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the following exceptions: • Lot Area: 15,000 square feet. • Front Yard: 35 feet, except lots in cul -de -sacs shall have a front yard setback of 30 feet. • Side Yard: 10 feet. • Side Yard Adjacent to a Street: 20 feet. • Lot Width: 80 feet. • Rear Lot Width: A rear lot width of 125 feet adjacent to certain lots shall not apply. • Buffer Lots: Buffer lots adjacent to certain lots shall not apply. • Curvilinear Street Design: A maximum street centerline of 1600 feet. • Sidewalks: Sidewalks on both sides of street except when "Internal Project Trail" is shown (6 ft). ACTION NEEDED: 1. C ATTACHMENTS: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) onsider zoning change and development plan approval Background Information Vicinity Map Plans and Support Information Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated March 3, 2006 Surrounding Property Owners Map Surrounding Property Owners Responses Ordinance No. 480 -482 Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (748 -8067) Dennis Killough (748 -8072) Case No. ZA05 -169 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNERS: Sunnybrook Properties, Inc. and Derrell & Kitti Johnson APPLICANT: Mady Development Corporation PROPERTY SITUATION: 2440 Johnson Rd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts, 613, 6D, 8, 8A, 8A2A, and 8A2B, J. J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521; and Lot 1, Block 1, Johnson Place Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District and "SF-IA" Single Family Residential District REQUESTED ZONING: "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District HISTORY: -A preliminary plat was approved by City Council for the Father Joe Addition on August 6, 1991. -A final plat was approved by City Council for Lot 1 of Father Joe Addition on August 6, 1991 as well. -City Council approved a final plat for Lots 2 & 3, Father Joe Addition on October 1, 1991. -A change of zoning from "CS" to "SF-IA" was approved by City Council on Lot 1, Father Joe Addition on January 6, 2004. -A plat revision was approved by City Council on December 16, 2003 for the Johnson Place Addition. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Randol Mill Avenue, or the future F.M. 1938 roadway expansion, to be an arterial street with 140 feet of right -of -way and Johnson Road to be 2 -lane, undivided collector with 70 feet of right -of -way. Right -of -way will be dedicated for these roadways. Existinz Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed subdivision will have one (1) street intersecting with Randol Mill Avenue (the future F.M. 1938 roadway expansion) to the east and one (1) street intersecting with Johnson Road to the south. Both Randol Mill Avenue and Johnson Road are currently 2 -lane, undivided roadways. The north/south alignment of Randol Mill Avenue is planned to be a 4 -lane, divided arterial street with 140 feet of right -of -way (the future F.M. 1938 roadway expansion). The future F.M. 1938 roadway will Case No. Attachment A ZA05 -169 Page 1 ultimately provide access to State Highway 114 to the north. PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN: WATER & SEWER May, 2005 traffic counts on Randol Mill Ave (between F.M. 1709 and Florence Rd 24hr North Bound NB 4,065 South Bound (SB) (4,142 NB Peak A.M. 373 7 - 8 a.m. Peak P.M. 349 4 - 5 p.m. SB Peak A.M. 350 7:45 - 8:45 a.m. Peak P.M. 352 4:30 — 5:30 p.m. Traffic Impact Use # Lots Vtpd* AM- IN AM- OUT PM- IN PM OUT Single-Family Residential 65 622 12 37 42 24 *Vehicle Trips Per Day * *The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on Randol Mill Ave. The Southlake Pathways Master Plan recommends an 8 -foot multi -use trail along the creek that crosses a small part of the proposed subdivision on the west side of the development. Additionally, the subdivision ordinance requires minimum 4 -foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the streets within the subdivision and must provide safe connections to City trails. The applicant is proposing a sidewalk and trail system as part of the development. A 6 -inch water line exists along the east side of Randol Mill Avenue. A 6- inch sanitary sewer line exists along the west side of Randol Mill Avenue. TREE PRESERVATION: Although I have not spoken to or met with the applicant, the submitted plan shows an excellent attempt in preserving as many quality trees as possible on a development site. The tree labeled "Post Oak Best Tree on Property" is actually a Blackjack Oak with a 50' canopy spread and is proposed to be preserved within the round -a -bout median in the center of the right -of -way. The trees in the central portion of the property are all Hackberry, American Elm and Mulberry, and are in poor to fair condition. All of the trees along the two existing fence lines that run north and south splitting the three lots are small hackberry, bois -d -arc, cedar elm and other small native trees that have been suppressed and deformed by the overgrowth of grapevine and greenbrier. The best "Quality trees on the site are located within the far west portion of the property where there are three (3) stands of mostly Post Oaks that are proposed to be preserved in a large open space area. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: The Johnson Place development drains in 4 directions. The eastern portion of the site drains to two (2) proposed detention ponds - one (1) at the northeast corner of the site adjacent to Randol Mill, and one (1) at the southeast corner of the development along Randol Mill. The outfall of the Case No. Attachment A ZA05 -169 Page 2 two ponds will be along the roadway of Randol Mill. The western portion of the site drains also drains to two (2) proposed detention ponds — one (1) at the southwest corner of the site near the park which will outfall directly into the creek, and one (1) at the southwest corner of the site closest to Johnson Road which will outfall at Johnson Road. SOUTHLAKE 2025: City Council approved the recommendations made by the Southlake 2025 committee for the Davis Blvd/F.M. 1938 Corridor study area to include the following changes: Land Use Recommendations • Existing LUP Designation - Low Density Residential. The proposed development does not meet the criteria for LD- Residential. Definition of LD- Residential — "detached single - family residential development at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per net acre ". The applicant has submitted a letter with justifications for the proposed land use. Environmental Resource Protection Recommendations • The Environmental Resource Protection Plan recommends the protection and enhancement of critical environmental and natural features, including trees and ponds. P &Z ACTION: February 23, 2006; Approved to tabled (6 -0) until March 9, 2006. 1) 2) 3) 4) STAFF COMMENTS: Al March 9, 2006; Approved (4 -2) subject to the Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated March 3, 2006 and the following conditions: Deleting Lot 24, Block 1; Requiring a temporary turn - around and easement at the terminus of Street F. Subject to the commitments made by the developer in the letter to Hillside Court Homeowner's Association dated February 20, 2006. And subject to the developer's commitment to aerate the ponds. tached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated March 3, 2006. Please note that the Zoning and Development Plan as proposed is not compliant with the City's Master Land Use Plan's "Low Density Residential" Land Use Designation. A justification letter from the applicant is included as part of Attachment `C' . Any motion for approval of this item should include justification for non - compliance with the Land Use Plan. M \Community Development \MEMO \2005cases \05- 169ZDP.doc Case No. ZA05 -169 Attachment A Page 3 Vicinity Map Johnson Place 0 Case No. ZA05 -169 Attachment C Page 1 o� O M b � T �— 2.onln :AG -- 6 eeeLerosGvax 'd I1Ht�11 "- Z—i.,. SFIA �Lanalg: AC .. � I + � I • � - ~--- -w. I ~ � 18 # 37 a+5� I. "'1� � : 1 � I ___ -n 10 9 A.r 1 — , �. / "kill F. SI'_4A. 'R /�t ' •i - S Rp qf. - i }: 5 �' _ II. .! Lrnl> f}PIJP fi a 3Txls -., SF11 tl9 7 I r• - - f { r v i 1 rnnrgcsAZo Rlll 5 1 { g c•>b�.rcw yrc r,en r�x� ----- r w =- !__. t - 51 - ; 1 rnl '".. - - -. , Area Summary S'Mefnry was y .- - " "�' —.F I Iteslderdla lob $p -4196 %.23 dL 40 - i - ' I - - RfgraoF -Way _ r :.... Lpll1 ng: AC' l ,f I • 1 �' I Is i,pu V 9i'1uynN R&W MI Dakcal -, 2.07% 0.90e _ f /,. J 9 { .•� 1 :i IN1x+�l Shams 15.41% 6.69 ac C- -0—Rra _{ - y L ,Y �Fl ao,� -- III x _ j OPM spa 22.11% 9,60— GMa V lntemd ft ).t sl nrl I a wea9e t 43A2 ac rsr & - - - - -- = - 'v'" AA ~°. F' _ +' SItC Data ;; ~ ~. ;r• 1�, } -7 ; ek4eage 35,87 ec ' • - 1 .:'. g t 1.45 dufa 1 t 9 s; P f y. r. 1 .91 T ` °+ f +F `c I Ike O.ALY 1 -76 du/x lot Summary kr .� : , . . 1 I Ilmx 63 ` 1 q .Te«.r. ` r I_ -: PR 1g:A 1 1 j QWt A— ]5,0W C.F. I p - - - - Ae 17 I - , x H s1 w:a mmrea.u — — - L.U.D./Zo .a. +.e ,•, i .' ' „ �'� " „' zoning: SFIh -n 1 i Erntr,q Lu,p.: W. pointy PeaYleltw 14 46 SF .. peopnaeC -: Mcdirm PCrety ResdcNW I „n.•,,. - -_- - N:ppeeed,% —g: RF1131 SAGE GROUP, INC. Weppred roe: r9� Mady Development Corporation ���� ` ''° 545 E. John Carpenter Freeway Zoning Case # ZA05 -169 n«tr.�d :..spew suite 1500 L r - ,.ear 1 rKTP4 1 Irving, Texas 75062 0I MAR D fa 9n•R F1Nf %Q p , � johwa<m P Lac& -A Residential P.U.D. Development Plan & Pedestrian Access Plan Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas N n o� J I C _ Aw �. JM'+r e ,✓: �, , a ll l SIDE COORS f� +I 1l� '^ t, ? 1 9. ko a r 1, `� _, �. r3 ,., y.,� I H ; J I , '�� •'� I M t � ` -� � ;�' � � ' � r • �..,� +, 4rr� _ ", _ -b � I r �_ to '� 9 I Area Summary_ �' E ' •�../ �'+ -l' �_ '� , f a +, R+ SQ Alal Lot 6D.41% 2 &27 K. I b � l • - _ �, I '�'!'� Randd Hd W ojm, 2.07% 0.9Q x. 7 Wlmvl gl o 15.41% 6.69 tt. � C Goss Arn je 1m.40% 4ST au CSite Data . .'� .. J JG -�. I I : - i Nd Rriw 35A3ar. ii , yy 7! y Gt DavftV 1.45 d:4W_ ka Dem0 1.76 d lx. 7 +.... 1 Lot Summary ., i S Ld. to hpnrcvrn SsaWap Lot wca ls,Doosr. . j t ,./ ... - • y _ Cownnn Areas 17 L .UA./zoniN OP_ sw x E e.>» i q xumo: RG S SI lnerrw wale! rinks ' 3 � „� `r � Ofvwsed LLLD.: Hmlm D—ly Residw� !'� !.. �[4' prppomd ZuWmy RR1D S a IRr- �f fl Q V HAB Ttoft Ol MAR O6 1 Imloa Cora�rron j ahA"-v, , , P la.,G& w — Oar A Projeaoi; . Mady Development Corporation Southlake, Texas w n o� 4 4 L 11111 SSI 1 f r1 t'N'I �� t vow ' L � . J' 1 �`" ,� r 1 � �' x tia. � „ r� l �'1 �. � y -1 I • �:. 1 � h .�" .1 7� ' , � s , x R y �, '� f'�� = � i " y� -- - rte, �..+..:_ '.t.:; r j _�r • 1i � ��� - r y 11, - f iTA SAGE GROUP, INC. Prepared fa^. 1�Ae1 Mady DLvelopment OwWration�� " ' 545 E. John Carpenter Freeway 43.42 A cre Site V fir 1J 1� wsnwu+re cw suite 15170 Ol FLWi r� l i Irving, Texas 75052 .100, a IOtl• Boa ru LJ � � Y T) ta� Southiake, Tarrant County, Texas b � � n f plac� south , r We are pleased to present ".Johnson Place," a proposed residential community of luxury homes in Southlake, Texas_ Johnson Place is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Johnson Road and Randol Mill Avenue. The property has been known as "the Johnson place" ever since the current owner's grandfather first purchased the initial 35 acres in 1897. Nearby .Johnson Road was named for the family. The proposed development intends to honor this pioneering Southlake family by using the land to create a high quality neighborhood of homes, greenbelts and park -like open spares, highlighted by "Johnson Park," an open space preserve near the old family home place. Johnson Park will be specifically located to preserve a high quality grove of old Post Oak trees, and will provide a central gathering space for the residents. In fact, the entire development plan. the streets, open space medians, greenbelts and pathway systems revolve around the features found naturally on the property, such as the significant trees- both the occasional stately large trees and the several buffering tree rows. Johnson Place is bounded by the Hillside Estates to the north, (a one -acre lot low density development), The Trailhead, (a 20,000 sX lot medium density development), several mostly acre plus residential lots to the south on and across Johnson Road, and Myers Meadow, (a 13,000 s. f. and up lot Residential PUD across Randol Mill to the East). Johnson Place offers 63 home sites on 43.42 acres, a density of I A5 homes per acre. Abundant open space has been made integral to the development- over 22% of the site_ and the lots range in size from 15,000 s.f to 30,000 s_f_, and with an average size of over 1 5,000 s.f. In additional to Johnson Park, the plan features a greenbelt and pathway along the northern boundary (providing a buffer to Hillside Estates and preserving a large row of significant trees), an open space buffer along Johnson Road, designed to preserve the existing tree canopy and rural feel of the road, and several green medians and a round- a-bout in the roads- specifically designed to link and preserve significant trees interior to the property. The project will have several "park -like" drainage features, engineered to assure adjacent properties there will be no increase in storm runoff that will occur as a result of this development. RC S[! � A R it 2 _ 206 Case No. Attachment C ZA05 -169 Page 5 Land Use Designation: Although the site currently carries a Land Use Designation of Low Density residential, we believe this proposal, which requests a change to Medium Density Residential is justified and desirable for many reasons: First, this development would line the Medium Density Residential land uses currently East and West of the property, continuing an existing horizontal band of Medium Density Residential throughout this portion of the city. There remains some Low Density Residential on the Land Use Plan to the South along Randol Mill, between Johnson Rd. and 5outhiake Blvd.; much, however, of that area is currently going through the process to be rezoned to commercial uses. This development would then be in position to act as a transition urea, between those commercial uses and the Low Density Residential to our North, while at the same time preserving the unique "rural" environment along Johnson Road. The proposed plan addresses both of these areas by providing an Open Space buffer along our northern boundary, and- along Johnson Road- by setting -back all development (both lots and walls/ fences) from Johnson Road a minimum of 40' feet, in a greenbelt, to make sure the magnificent trees there are preserved. Secondly, this development is directly adjacent to, and will receive primary access from FM 1938 (Randol Mill Ave.), an ultimate 6 lane, divided, 140' wide, "Regional Blvd.," which will be carrying a large amount of traffic, generating a noise level more suited to MDR than LDR. Third, while the property is mostly open pasture land, it does contain some isolated pockets of existing high - quality trees, as well as significant individual trees. Developing it as Medium Density Residential, rather than Low Density Residential will allow for a greater ability to save those trees in Open Space reserves, and the means to care for and showcase them as significant amenities and natural features in the community, fi1FUro lFsrl1i 0IJ L1:.liJ Case No. ZA05 -169 Attachment C Page 6 Residential Planned United Development District - Land Use and Development Regulations for Johnson Place This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as it pertains to the "SF -20A" Single- Family Residential zoning district and the City of Southlake Subdivision Ordinance No_ 483, as amended, with the following exceptions: Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall not be less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. Front Yard: The minimum front yard of a lot shall not be less than thirty -five (35) feet, except for front yards along corner or cul -de -sacs "balls," in which ease the minimum front yard setback shall be thirty (30) feet. Side Yard: The minimum side yard shall not be less than ten (10) feet. Side Yard Adjacent to a Street: The minimum side yard abutting a street shall not be less than twenty (20) Feet, unless otherwise noted. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum width of eighty (80) feet, measured at the Front Yard setback line For each lot as indicated on the Zoning Site Plan. Rear Yard: Each lot shall have a minimum rear yard of Forty (40) feet. Section 8-01E of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, regarding lot width along the rear property line of certain lots shall not apply to property within this Residential Planned Unit Development.' Section 80 1 G of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, regarding buffer lots adjacent to certain lots shall not apply to property within this Residential Planned Unit Development. *The proposed maximum street centerline radius for curvilinear street design requirements shall be 1600'. A minimum 4' wide concrete sidewalk shall be required on both sides of all internal streets, except where superseded by the "Internal Project Trail, a 6' concrete path, in locations as shown on the Zoning Site Plan. Case No. ZA05 -169 Attachment C Page 7 February 20, 2006 Via email:johnjgeist er hotmail.cont 4 g HILLSIDE COURT H01MEO'WNERS ASSOCIATION c/o MR. JOHN GEIST 2405 Hillside Court Southlake, TX 76092 MARY DEVELOPMENT RE-. .JOHNSON PLACE Si1PnIVISION CORPORATION Dear John: o 1500 Carpenter Freevrpy 51rl Further to my meeting with you and your neighbors on February 19, 2006, the Irving Texos 75062 following confirms our ab�reernent to provide wrought iron fencing along our mutual Telephone: 12141 630OA81 property line as follows: Telecopior; 12 141 630 4560 1. We will provide a 6' Wrought iron fence along the northern boundary of our planned development from the back of the new masonry screening wall to be constructed along Randol Mill on the east side, to the western limit of the 1 3 acre Johnson lot, that is not be part of the Johnson PIacc subdivision. 2 The fence is to be a 6' Wrought iron fence, painted black, with a horizontal top rail /cap along the top. The fence will not contain pickets or spikes, not will it have horizontal cross members across the fence, except for the eery top rail and bottom of the fence 3. We will clean up (lye ttees and brush on our property only up to the property line. We will not complete any brush or tree removal on any of the Hillside Court homeowners' property. We will require temporary access into the Hillside Court homeowners' lots only for the purposes of erecting the new fence. Please note that we will attempt to keep the fence located exactly on the property line as much as possible, while still attempting to save as many significant trees as possible 4. We will remove the existing barbwire cow Pence. 5. Construction of the fencing will not be completed until after the streets have been installed in the Johnson Place subdivision, and final lot grading has commenced. The fence will be installed prior to any vertical construction being completed on new homes in the Johnson Place subdivision I trust the foregoing serves to confirm our discussions and our agreement to provide this fencing, at our expense, should the concept plan, as currently submitted to the City of Southlake, be ultimately approved "as is" by the City Council, Case No. ZA05 -169 Attachment C Page 8 We appreciate your cooperation and support of our project to date and would urge you and your neighbors to please attend the planning and zoning commission hearings and city council meetings clearly voicing your support of this project. Case No. ZA05 -169 Should you require anything further in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me personally Vice President - Finance GTP:dh C+�L173�i3i�� lf�i7� RECD F E D Attachment C Page 9 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA05 -169 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 03/03/06 Project Name: Zoning and Development Plan for Johnson Place APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: Mady Development Corporation Sage Group, Inc. Phone: Phone: (972) 929 -8443 Fax: Fax: (972) 929 -1241 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 3/02/06, AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748 -8069. The following changes are needed regarding streets: a. Staff recommends street stubs be centered into the boundaries of the properties to the SE and SW. b. Staff recommends that the street stub into the northwest boundary be shifted west to abut the northwest corner of the development boundary. This recommendation is based on existing tree cover, the location of the existing tract boundaries to the north and existing improvements on the northern property. Please note that dedication of ROW will be required in accordance with the MTP and TXDOT Davis/FM1938 extension plans at the time of subdivision platting. * A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans /documents and conditions of approval is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or before acceptance of any other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be reviewed and stamped "approved" by the Planning Department. All development must comply with the City's Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and detain all post development run -off. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a construction permit a Preliminary Plat, Plat Vacation of Johnson Place Addition, Final Plat, Construction Plans, Developer's Agreement must be processed and approved and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Prior to a building permit the subdivision public improvements must be accepted by the City and the Final Plat filed in the County Plat Records. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA05 -169 Page 1 Case No. 05 -169 Review No. _ Dated: February 17, 2006 Number of Pages: Project Name: Johnson Place (Zoning Change & Development Plan) Comments due to the Planning Department: February 14, 2006 Contact: Keith Martin Phone: (817) 748 -8229 Fax: (817) 481 -5713 The following comments are based on the review ofplans received on February 6, 2006 Comments designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P &Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. Are the bufferyards correctly shown and labeled? Yes, a 15' type Q bufferyard is proposed along Randol Mill Ave. Is a tree survey required? Yes, a tree survey of the property was provided. TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: Although I have not spoken to or met with the applicant, the submitted plan shows an excellent attempt in preserving as many quality trees as possible on a development site. The tree labeled "Post Oak Best Tree on Property" is actually a Blackjack Oak with a 50' canopy spread and is proposed to be preserved within the round -a -bout median in the center of the right - of -way. The trees in the central portion of the property are all Hackberry, American Elm and Mulberry, and are in poor to fair condition. All of the trees along the two existing fence lines that run north and south splitting the three lots are small hackberry, bois -d -arc, cedar elm and other small native trees that have been suppressed and deformed by the overgrowth of grapevine and greenbrier. The best "Quality trees on the site are located within the far west portion of the property where there are three (3) stands of mostly Post Oaks that are proposed to be preserved in a large open space area. Case No. ZA05 -169 Attachment D Page 2 Surrounding Property Owners Johnson Place 1L SIDE CT 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 40 39 38 37 48 42 22 28 21 20 29 44 49 11 46 45 19 30 31 18 LLANT CT 17 33 32 16 15 34 35 14 Z 43 41 47 51 50 R1 T 36 52 54 55 53 13 12 OD O m 27 26 23 25 1 2 24 Case No. Attachment E ZA05 -169 Page 1 Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage 1. Richardson, Anna Leslie SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 2. Berkenbile, Stephen & Janet SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 3. Garrett, Ross W & Karen L SF-IA Low Density Residential 0.974 4. Ewan, John D Jr & Lynn SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 5. Gallagher, John & Yvette SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.034 6. Mower, Stephen C & Paula T SF-IA Low Density Residential 0.990 7. Cunningham, Robert R & Beth SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.007 8. Geist, John J & Pilar D SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.034 9. Smart, Vole W & Beverly SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.073 10. Johnson, Derrell & Kitt SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.3 11. Johnson, Derrell E SF-IA Low Density Residential 18.462 12. Smith, Edward C & Tracy R -PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344 Case No. Attachment E ZA05 -169 Page 1 13. Williams, Robert & Mai F R -PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344 14. Fore, Stan & Lisa R -PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344 15. Milke, Keith E & Dina M R -PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344 16. Guy, Bradley C & Meredith A R -PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344 17. Holbert, Barbara A & Andrew R -PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344 18. Chaturvedi, Purnima & San'eev R -PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344 19. Rodriguez, J Hector & Rebecca R -PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344 20. Stiller, Robert A Jr & Jane R -PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344 21. Quintanilla, Jose & Ana R -PUD Medium Density Residential 0.343 22. Lee, Jae Y & J Lee R -PUD Medium Density Residential 0.442 23. Purvis, Willis N & Avis SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.747 24. Bishop, Paul H SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.315 25. McFadden, John L SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.377 26. Bryant, Kreg & Tambra SF-IA Low Density Residential 0.659 27. Weinstein, R A & Michelle SF -20A Low Density Residential 1.209 28. Trailhead HOA SF -20A Medium Density Residential 2.735 29. Dickerson, Donald F SF -20A Medium Density Residential 0.577 30. Denkeler, Michael L SF -20A Medium Density Residential 0.459 31. White, Paul E & Janice D SF -20A Medium Density Residential 0.478 32. Thompson, Herlinda SF -20A Medium Density Residential 0.463 33. Ott, Rick A & Debra SF -20A Medium Density Residential 0.463 34. McDuff, Frank M Jr & M C SF -20A Medium Density Residential 0.460 35. Beaudry, Bart & Elizabeth SF -20A Medium Density Residential 0.554 36. Adelaar, Glenn & Rowena A SF -20A Medium Density Residential 0.545 37. Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Ent Inc R -PUD Low Density Residential 2.0 38. Rowse y, Bryan M & Christy AG Low Density Residential 0.682 39. Pot sman, Mary Noble AG Low Density Residential 4.508 40. Thorne, Kenneth L & Rebecca AG Low Density Residential 10.0 41. Johnson, G K AG Low Density Residential 1.67 42. Johnson, D E AG Low Density Residential 0.50 43. Johnson, G K AG Low Density Residential 1.0 44. Johnson, D E AG Low Density Residential 2.9 45. Sunn brook Properties, Inc AG Low Density Residential 11.1 46. Sunn brook Properties, Inc AG Low Density Residential 2.7 47. Johnson, G K AG Low Density Residential 0.597 48. Johnson, D E AG Low Density Residential 0.06 49. Johnson, Derrell E AG Low Density Residential 7.3 50. Zamores, Francisco S AG Low Density Residential 2.0 51. Warner, Jesse & Sue AG Low Density Residential 2.25 52. Hookstratten, Joanna AG Low Density Residential 1.1 53. Tarrant County AG Low Density Residential 2.292 54. Hookstratten, Joanna AG Low Density Residential 0.88 55. Hookstratten, Joanna AG Low Density Residential 0.791 Case No. ZA05 -169 Attachment E Page 2 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Johnson Place Notices Sent: Forty-Seven (47) Responses Received: One (1) Dave Ewan 2305 Hillside Ct. Received March 9, 2005 Case No. ZA05 -169 Attachment F Page 1 Lorrie Fletcher Case No. ZA0_5 -169 From; Ewan. Dave [EwanD�Paepinc.com] S4,-pt: Wednesday, Mar& 48, 2006 5:29 PM Tee: Urria Fratcher Subir?ch Planning and ZaningComrnlsshm inf -ormal'!en for tomcnrrn4 nights me °ling Ma Fletcher Gould you plon8a distribute this to the members of the planning and zonIng commission before tomorrow nights meting? Flegarding--- -ZAr05 -169 Johnson. Rd and Randol Mill Rat My wife end I (Lyrin and Dave Eagan) wou like to voice ULlr uuncern regarding the change of the property behind our home at 2305 Hill C nLirt from rural to 1 5,000 SQ Ft residential Ivts, We came to the meeting last week and you turned the proposition down and told therm to come back with biggler leas. This week they are back with a proposal dropping) a couple of lots in the front of the subdivision and adding a little mare green space with a little pond. Since we trxiII be ottt of town on business tafnarrow night and cannot make the meeting we would like this to represent our thoughts. I don't know whey they cut the fots out of the front of the subdivision and left the 3 lets behind our property Intact and at the same size— That's right there will be 3 mouses behind ours -lots 14 -15 and the biggest part of 16. Our property because it is wide and not too deep -only 40 feet between our house and the property line w it suff er the greatest impact. We were told vi lie n we moved In that if anyone built on the property according to the P &F regulations they would have to be 14 acre lots . We understand that there Is gaing to he something built behind our house and would prefer that it would be a subdivislon, but thp lots should be In the 25,004 to 30,000 sq. ft. range. We do appreciate the green zotie and the fen c they have offered to build, but three houses is pretty strong. They U(JUld hi_ -eve just as easy takeri the houses they removed from the front out of the fine of fioLIses backed up to the line of homes an hillside Court and made all of the residents on Hillside Li little happier- We would have been tickled to death to have that pored replace one of the three houses they want to put behind us. F1entity is that all the lots in this subdivision should be larger and for the prices they wra +it to char€9e for the houses in this new subdivision, we believe they can still snake money. We appreciate your help in gett 1ng some changes made to the plan before approving it We also hope you don't have to stay up tilt three AM on this Meting - Thanks Lynn and Date Ewan Cell 817- 201 -6777 Email ewancl@aepine.com RO This ernait and any files transmitted with it are confidential. and intended solely for the tits& cf the ir4vidual or eaitily to whom the} are addressed Attachment F Page 2 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480 -482 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS, 6B, 6D 8, 8A, 8A2A, AND 8A2B, J.J. FRESHOUR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 521; AND LOT 1, BLOCK 1, JOHNSON PLACE ADDITION, IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND "SF -IA" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO "R -PUD" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH "SF -20A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT USES AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN, INCLUDING "PUD" DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT `B ", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FORA PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural District and Case No. Attachment G ZA05 -063 Page 1 "SF -IA" Single Family Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off- street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off - street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over - crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was Case No. Attachment G ZA05 -063 Page 2 made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over - crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Tracts, 6B, 6D, 8, 8A, 8A2A, and 8A2B, J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521; and Lot 1, Block 1, Johnson Place Addition, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and more fully and completely described in exhibit "A" from "AG" agricultural district and "SF -IA" single family residential district to "RPUD" residential planned unit development district with "SF -20A" single family residential district uses as depicted on the approved Development Plan, including "RPUD" development standards, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Case No. ZA05 -063 Attachment G Page 3 Exhibit "B ", and subject to the following specific conditions: SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tractor tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over - crowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, Case No. Attachment G ZA05 -063 Page 4 affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition Case No. ZA05 -063 Attachment G Page 5 of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper onetime within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 19"' day of July, 2005. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 2nd day of August, 2005. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. ZA05 -063 Attachment G Page 6 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. ZA05 -063 Attachment G Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Tracts, 613, 61), 8, 8A, 8A2A, and 8A2B, J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521; and Lot 1, Block 1, Johnson Place Addition, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas: INSERT METES AND BOUNDS HERE Case No. ZA05 -063 Attachment G Page 8 o� 00 w T 7a.i 11 AG I - Y HII.I SIIPF Ct1l N] - Z-ing: SF1,A / I ' - .. '- - 'U _- S ` -- -- s .- I °-- ---- 1 .._ � �r 1p., u arl:n I. �-- ilk e i bmllg Ali /� i [.�LiL ICI Legend 'a •. f� 31 I� 32, 33 l� "-4i1, F 4gn1 `SFI S -. B I..• r__ r 7 .4 I�-1 -4 nrouy� um wn �. -�.v,. ''� 6 Area Summary d 5. 111 - �I�PT�!T"? I I � - IfY� 9tl � p` 6Mrwmy0H4eWMben rcrce .. --.-- J # 1--. 1'r �..� 1 ;` - ., . :�,.� . �r , •l r �� i — _e � re; �RRSip¢�,1tl4' kom 60.41% as.as rle mwro•se ��viceee I l l i l - :„ ZonwF AG l Stl n na o t dl �n S -41% 6 .4a ac y IS'Tyge "'}.'6Wreyer0 T - .w 4 .i 7 �j � I _ .t , I • . ; � _ IMHneI Bets i -�1% 6.69 ae C--Opo s3- •-. bMy ]� •�' �s r �, �� PGafi `-0e[4 72.11% 9.6a x, 6 ]Neenel Pry i T�ki ^ ^� I r y� ' G,ma6 Avmpe 1 9 A aG a'SAlaak - f ' 40�j II S1tR Data v 42, .' �: , j 47.42 x. 'P 1,45dWm 44 y - J 1 1 ; Ne40N4tY 1.74 d+lAC 3 it , y i , f n dn'V 1' Lai Summary r i •" I ` � � 9�IV9!Il� _ Resde,lm�lnn 67 •�. ¢ • t -. _- i 4 dr 1 L� �11g: AC II �, 1 MrNnun 0111d.9la[ Aacw 15.000 0- CIXfIn901't Af 17 A ! 11 11 . 5 SP A R d A 11 - - �r pY'A_d4tw1rw91J I - -• t.0 o.f2:onlrrg `"•� � t a �`� � lollm� SF1A _ 1 � �"'1 � i�sJnq k.0 0 - aax 7dFS'N Res[dentlal n..+".'' w� "",�{ i ; . - ,�. 1 I E%4*q Z91PM: AG & 5F -IA r a WQP* E U.D. M.&. O—W foefiovnFal - fl9pmdIWrrp: Rh1D (� SAGE GROUP, INC. P�parera for: Mady development Corporation u-aup!paNxere 545 E. ]ohn Carpenrer Freeway Zoning Case # ZA05 -169 ►J lil '�] 1 - 1 s`"'"�"""•ar.sasac Sui[e1S00 .y,.a,. Y+rS T�fii _ rl MAR ra Tar: uses Irving, Texas 75062 r 1 o lm' — — - �J Residential P.U.D. D evelo ment Plan & Pedestrian Access Plan o�'' ��� y � p p1cw"e/ Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas b � va Residential Planned United Development District - Land Use and Development Regulations for Johnson Place This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as it pertains to the "SF -20A" Single- Family Residential zoning district and the City of Southlake Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the following exceptions: Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall not be less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. Front Yard: The minimum front yard of a lot shall not be less than thirty -five (35) feet, except for front yards along corner or cul -de -sacs "bails," in which case the minimum front yard setback shall be thirty (30) feet. Side Yard: The minimum side yard shall not be less than ten (10) feet. Side Yard Adjacent to a Street: The minimum side yard abutting a street shall not be less than twenty (20) Feet, unless otherwise noted. Lol Width: Each lot shall have a minimum width of eighty (80) feet, measured at the Front Yard setback line For each lot as indicated on the Zoning Site Plan. Rear Yard: Each lot shall have a minimum rear yard of forty (40) feet. Section 8.01E of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, regarding lot width along the rear property line of certain lots shall not apply to property within this Residential Planned Unit Development,* Section 80 1 G of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, regarding buffer lots adjacent to certain lots shall not apply to property within this Residential Planned Unit Development. *The proposed maximum street centerline radius for curvilinear street design requirements shall be 1600'. A minimum 4' wide concrete sidewalk shall be required on both sides of all internal streets, except where superseded by the "Internal Project Trail, a 6' concrete path, in locations as shown on the Zoning Site Plan. Case No. Attachment G ZA05 -063 Page 10