Loading...
Item 4BCity of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM March 1, 2006 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting March 7, 2006 4A. Mayor's Report: 1. Southlake Lions Club presentation - Pieter Andries Hye, representing the Southlake Lions Club, is announcing the official creation of the Southlake Shield Foundation and would like to honor Retired Chief of Police Marlin Price. Chief Price had the vision of a foundation that would provide funds to the families of police officers or firefighters who are injured or killed in the line of duty. The Southlake Lions Club took that vision and created the Southlake Shield Foundation — set up to provide immediate funds of assistance to the families of fallen officers or firefighters. The Southlake Lions Club would also like to unveil a glass plaque honoring Chief Price for his vision and dedication to his officers. Shhh ... we're surprising him! 2. Southlake Chamber of Commerce — Youth of the Year - Alex Clift was honored at this year's Southlake Chamber of Commerce Annual Awards Luncheon as the Southlake Youth of the Year. Alex displays a wealth of talents and interests. He is active in his church, scout troop, and at Carroll Senior High School where he participates in the band as a Section Leader and as a member of the National Honor Society. During his freshman year, Alex set out to get to know his fellow students by wearing a nametag every day and sitting with a different group of people at lunch. Now that he is a senior in high school, Alex has ambitions to continue his educational and extracurricular activities at the United States Air Force Academy. We are very pleased to have someone of Alex's caliber representing our community and wish him all the best in his future pursuits. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 2 of 41 We are hoping that Alex will be able to join you at your upcoming Council meeting and are still awaiting confirmation. If need be, this item may be transferred to your March 21 meeting. 4B. City Manager's Report: No further report is planned at this time. 4C. Parks and Recreation Board Report: Parks Board Chair Mary Georgia is scheduled to present the Parks Board report at the City Council meeting. 5A. Approve the minutes for the February 13, 2006, City Council work session and the January 21, 2006, regular City Council meeting. The minutes have been included in your packet. Contact Lori Farwell with questions on this item. 5B. Authorize the Mayor to execute two lease agreements with Metro PCS Texas, L.L.C., for the placement of wireless communication antennas on the Bicentennial Park and Florence Water towers. Staff has been negotiating with Metro PCS Texas, LLC, for two water tower lease agreements. They are interested in installing a total of twelve cellular antennas on the Bicentennial and Florence water towers. They will be implementing approximately 450 cell sites in the DFW area, and the Bicentennial and Florence tower installations would be key in providing cellular service throughout the Southlake area. These lease agreements have been reviewed by the city attorney. Approval by City Council of these lease agreements would generate over $60,240 per year for the City; possibly generating in excess of $1.5 million if both contracts survive the overall 25 year term. Contact Bob Price with questions on this item. 5C. Authorize the Mayor to execute a Residential Developer's Agreement for 1223 Woodsey Court for the construction of approximately 985 linear feet of public sanitary sewer along Woodsey Court. The developer has constructed a house at 1223 Woodsey Court, which is an existing lot with a septic system. The developer has decided to extend public sewer instead of utilizing the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 3 of 41 existing septic system and will construct 985 linear feet of off -site public sanitary sewer line. This developer's agreement covers the construction of these public improvements. Contact Bob Price with questions on this item. 5D. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a settlement agreement with Marcus Cable Associates, L.L.C. d /b /a Charter Communications relating to the Consortium Cities audit of Charter Communications. In 2003, several issues arose that led the City to join a consortium of cities consisting of Fort Worth, Burleson, Benbrook, Duncanville, Hurst, Keller and North Richland Hills. The consortium of cities believed that Charter was not correctly calculating outage conditions in relation to the terms of the cable franchise agreement with the cities. Several letters were sent to Charter notifying Charter of their alleged violation of the franchise agreement. In March 2004, the City Council agreed to participate in the coalition of cities with a payment of $3,961 to fund an initial contribution toward legal and expert witness fees and other costs associated with the formal hearing process. The hearing process was designed to recover damages from Charter relating to the non - compliance with the customer service standards. Charter has proposed a settlement agreement. The agreement acknowledges the cities disagree on the methodology used to calculate abnormal operating conditions. It proposes new standards to be observed by Charter. The standards, while extremely technical, will be easier for the cities to be able to measure Charter's compliance. Additionally, Charter has offered a community grant to each city. The grant proposed is based on the percentage of customers Southlake had at the time of the initial complaint. Charter is proposing $9,903 annually for a period of the next four years. The grant will not be deducted from current franchise fees or passed on to their customers. The City Council will be able to determine how this grant is spent each year. Contact Gary Gregg with questions on this item. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 4 of 41 5E. Ordinance No. 893, 1 st Reading, Establishing an additional penalty on Ad Valorem personal property taxes which remain delinquent for more than 60 days after February 1 of any year. Approval of the ordinance does two things. First, it changes the date on which a penalty is first imposed to compensate the collection attorney for delinquent taxes on personal property as permitted by state law. Second, it increases the penalty to compensate the collection attorney from 15% to 20% as permitted by HB 490. This amendment would not have any financial impact on the City, as the additional penalty is paid by the delinquent taxpayer. All costs for delinquent tax collections are borne by the law firm, resulting in a "cost free" collection program for the City. Approval of Ordinance No. 893 will require an amendment to the current contract with the attorneys and staff will bring the amendment with the 2nd reading of the ordinance. Contact Sharen Jackson with question on this item. 5F. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P., for audit services. The City Charter requires the City at the close of each fiscal year to have an independent audit performed by a certified public accountant. Weaver and Tidwell L.L.P. serve as the city's independent auditors. As outlined in the agreement, the cost of the financial audit is not to exceed $65,000. Contact Sharen Jackson with questions on this item Note that your packet disk includes the planning presentation in an audio format. To view with audio double click the icon and make sure your speakers are on. The audio slide show has been developed to help you prepare for the meeting. Please give us your feedback so we'll know whether to continue this practice. Also, note that the presentations will be updated before Tuesday if anything changes. 7A. Ordinance No. 480 -479, 2nd Reading_(ZA05 -154), Zoning Change and Concept Plan for proposed Hawthorne Place on approximately 10 acres located along the east side of Randol Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 5 of 41 Mill Avenue approximately 1 feet north of Johnson Road, being legally described as Tracts IE, 1E01, 1D01, and a portion of Tract 1D02, Ben J. Foster Survey, Abstract No. 519. Current Zoning: AG Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: SF -20A Single Family Residential District. SPIN Neighborhood #13. PUBLIC HEARING. This property is located at 515 - 565 Randol Mill Ave. The concept plan shows a total of 17 lots, with 16 of the lots being for new single - family residential construction. The average lot size is 24,000 square feet. The proposal does not comply with the low density residential land use designation which recommends detached single - family residential development not exceeding a net one dwelling unit per acre. The net density of the proposed development is 1.6 dwelling units per acre. The applicant has provided his justification for the development which is included as part of attachment C in the staff report. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5 -0) on February 9; subject to concept plan review summary #3, dated February 3, and accepting the applicant's willingness to limit any fencing to wrought iron The City Council approved the first reading (4 -3) on February 21, subject to the Planning and Zoning Commissions recommendation, subject to submitting an entry feature plan, and noting that the detention pond is to also be a retention pond. Deputy Mayor Pro Tern Morrison and Council Members Hill and Jones dissented. The only change since the first reading is the submission of an entry feature plan which is included in your packet. Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item. 7B. ZA05 -155, Preliminary Plat for proposed Hawthorne Place on property located along the east side of Randol Mill Avenue approximately 1,200 feet north of Johnson Road. Current Zoning: AG Agricultural District. Proposed Zoning: SF -20A Single Family Residential District. SPIN Neighborhood #13. This is the plat associated with the previous agenda item. The plat is Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 6 of 41 consistent with the concept plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval subject to the plat review summary (5 -0) on February 9. Note that a denial of the zoning would eliminate the need to act on this plat. Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item. 7C. Ordinance No. 480 -480, 2 nd Reading_(ZA05 -068), Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Southlake Crossroads (f.k.a. Carroll Crossroads) on property described as being a portion of Tract 4G, O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, located at the southwest corner of East Southlake Boulevard and South Carroll Avenue. Current Zoning: AG Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: S -P -2 Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood 9 9e. PUBLIC HEARING. This site is located on the south side of East Southlake Boulevard just west of the Prade air strip and approximately 350 feet west of South Carroll Avenue. The plan proposes the development of two retail buildings totaling approximately 27,100 square feet adjacent to Southlake Boulevard and five office buildings totaling approximately 49,500 square feet on the southern half of the site adjacent to the future Zena Rucker Road. Under the "S -P -2" zoning the applicant proposes the following (see Attachment C) • C -2 local - retail commercial district uses and development regulations to exclude the following uses: o Cleaners, laundries and /or laundromats; grocery stores and /or meat markets; • Front Yard — not less than 30 foot along F.M. 1709. Not less than 20 foot for all other streets; • Floor Area — maximum area of 40,000 square feet per structure; • Loading Spaces — no loading spaces shall be required for the development; and • Architecture similar to renderings. The following variances are being requested: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 7 of 41 • Public Street R.O.W. — minimum 60 feet required, 50 feet right -of -way with 31 feet pavement width proposed; • Driveway Stacking — minimum 150 feet required, requesting as shown on concept plan; and • Driveway Spacing — minimum 500 feet required from Carroll Avenue. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5 -0) on February 9, subject to the concept plan review summary #4 dated February 3 and subject to the following: • noting that the permitted uses shall allow all C -2 uses with exception of laundromats, grocery stores and meat markets; • dry cleaners shall be limited to a maximum of 2,500 square feet with no on -site cleaning or pressing processes; • all buildings adjacent to the street must have store fronts facing the street; • the east driveway on Southlake Boulevard must be right -in /right -out; and • approving requested regulations and variances except as noted. City Council approved the first reading (5 -2) on February 21, subject to the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission; subject to the concept plan review summary 94, dated February 3; and noting the applicant has agreed to the following: • 100% office on the southern parcel (lot) and will integrate design of southern parcel with northern parcel; • deleting the dry cleaner use; • provide revised building elevations at second reading; • the center landscape areas will have stone retaining wall; • A minimum 5 foot high wrought iron fence to be provided adjacent to the air strip; • If a retaining wall is required along the adjoining boundaries, establish a deed restriction that will require removal of the retaining wall when properties develop; • noting that a good job has been done in coordinating access between other parcels and the adjoining properties; Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 8 of 41 Mayor Pro Tem Shankland and Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Morrison dissented The proposed "S -P -2" uses, regulations, and plans have been submitted to address conditions of the first reading approval and are included in your packet The plan does not comply with the City's land use plan. This area has an underlying "Office Commercial" designation with an optional T -1 on the north and T -2 on the south portion. Any approval of this request as currently proposed must include justification. A justification letter has been provided by the applicant and is included as part of attachment `C'. There is opposition exceeding 20% of the surrounding property owners within 200 feet. A super majority vote (6 of 7 City Council members) is needed to approve this request. Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item. 7D. ZA05 -173, Preliminary Plat for Tracts 4G, 4D1, and 4EL O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899. The property is approximately 193 acres located approximately 340 feet west of the southwest corner of South Carroll Avenue and East Southlake Boulevard. Current Zoning: AG Agricultural District. Proposed Zoning: S -P -2 Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood 49e. This is the plat associated with the previous agenda item. The plat encompasses approximately 19.3 acres and shows the extension of a section of Zena Rucker Road through the middle portion of the tract. Approximately 9 acres south of Zena Rucker Road is not currently proposed for development and will require approval of an appropriate change of zoning prior to any future plan or plat being submitted for approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5 -0) subject to the plat review summary on January 17, 2006. Note that a denial of the zoning will eliminate the need to act on the plat Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 9 of 41 7E. Ordinance No. 585 -C, 2nd Readim, Tree Preservation Ordinance and Technical Manual. PUBLIC HEARING. Staff is proposing amendments to the city's Tree Preservation Ordinance to implement the Environmental Resource Protection recommendations of the Southlake 2025 Plan, the city's comprehensive master plan. The main changes include: the establishment of a tree preservation policy, requirements for tree conservation analyses and plans in conjunction with development applications, incorporation of a tree technical manual in conjunction with the ordinance, an increase in penalties for violation, and clarification of approval and administrative authority. The final draft ordinance incorporates comments received from the city attorney's office. The changes made since the first reading are generally limited to clarifications and vested rights. Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item. 7F. Resolution No. 06 -014, (ZA06 -006), Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages at Brio Tuscan Grille located 1431 Plaza Place. Current Zonins4: DT Downtown District. SPIN Neighborhood 48. PUBLIC HEARING. This restaurant is located south of Plaza Park in the Grand Avenue District of Southlake Town Square. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6 -0) on February 23, subject to the term of the applicant's lease on the property. Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item. 7G. Ordinance No. 512 -A, 2 " Reading, Amendin, Ordinance No. 512, which levied assessments for part of the cost of sanitary sewer improvements in Continental Park Estates in the City of Southlake. PUBLIC HEARING. In 1990, City Council approved Ordinance No. 512 which levied a sewer assessment for sanitary sewer improvements in Continental Park Estates. Purchase liens were imposed on all lots within the subdivision until full payment of the assessment. The ordinance imposed an interest rate of 10% per annum. There were a total of 69 lots assessed. There are 8 lots remaining with unpaid balances. In an effort to close the outstanding assessments and provide an incentive for the residents to pay the assessments, we are recommending an amendment to Ordinance No. 512. The ordinance includes a six month Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 10 of 41 incentive period with an interest rate of 4.3% for the outstanding balances. The interest collected per lot would be reduced by $5,728 (difference from $7,924 to $2,196). Staff will brief you on the results of the recent research on information provided by Mr. Samartin on Tuesday evening. Contact Sharen Jackson with questions on this item. 8A. Ordinance No. 480 -481, 1 st Reading_(ZA05 -146), Zoning Change and Site Plan for Bicentennial Plaza located at 410 West Southlake Boulevard. Current Zoning: C -2 Local Retail Commercial District. Requested Zoning: S -P -1 Detailed Site Plan District. An alternate site plan is also to be considered under the current C -2 Local Retail Commercial District zoning with no proposed zoning change. SPIN Neighborhood #10. This property is located at the northeast intersection of the Bicentennial Park entrance and West Southlake Boulevard. Under the proposed S -P -1 zoning, the primary site plan proposes approximately 12,550 square feet of retail floor space and construction of 20 off -site parking spaces and a driveway within the adjacent Bicentennial Park property. An additional 24 off -site parking spaces within the park property are also shown for future construction. This plan is dependent upon approval of a separate access and parking agreement between the City and the property owner. The proposal appeared before the Park Board and received a favorable recommendation. The uses and regulations proposed under the S -P -1 zoning are as follows: • There shall be a side yard setback of not less than ten feet along the east boundary; • Concrete tilt wall with a stained finish shall be permitted on a portion of the building in accordance with the architectural building elevations submitted; and • Parking — 72 parking spaces required, requesting 10% reduction or 65 spaces. The alternate site plan proposed under the current C -2 shows approximately 11,340 square feet of retail floor space with no off -site parking spaces on the park property. However, the plan does propose vehicular access through the park entry driveway which will require approval of an access agreement with the City. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 11 of 41 The following variances are requested: • Parking —67 spaces required, requesting 10% reduction or 60 spaces; • Masonry — Concrete tilt wall with a stained finish; and • Driveway Stacking — Minimum 50 feet required, 22 feet proposed on alternate plan. The following variances were granted with the currently approved site plan: • Driveway Stacking — Minimum 50 feet required, 41 feet proposed, and • Driveway Spacing — Minimum 250 feet required for right -in /right -out drives, 80 feet and 219 feet proposed. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6 -0) on February 23, subject to the site plan review summary 93 dated February 17, noting that the S -P -1 zoning and site plan is preferred, approving the alternate C -2 zoning revised site plan and granting the requested variances. Although the City Council can discuss the alternate revised site plan, final action on this plan cannot betaken until a public hearing is held. This is planned for March 21. Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 1. Log Cabin Committee Update. Included in your packet is a memo from Council Members and Log Cabin Committee Co- Chairs Laura Hill and Virginia Muzyka updating you on the current status of the Committee and providing background information on their efforts to date. 2. Citizen of the Year Award. Last Friday, February 24, the S.P.LN. Standing Committee was awarded the "Citizen of the Year" Award at the annual Chamber of Commerce banquet. I Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 12 of 41 think that such recognition by the business community points out how important the S.P.LN. program is to our city, and that the volunteer efforts by each of the representatives have not gone unnoticed. I will be recognizing S.P.LN. during the City Manager's Report at the second meeting in March. 3. Thursday, March 16 — Chamber of Commerce's Southlake Leadership class hosted by City Council, 3:00 — 7:00 p.m., Town Hall. Giovanna Phillips asked if City Council could host the next Southlake Leadership class in Town Hall on March 16. The content of the program is entirely up to Council's discretion but one suggestion is for Councilmembers to tour the 16- member class through Town Hall followed by round -table discussions. Giovanna indicated that Council is welcomed to the entire four hour timeframe, but if not, she could fill the remaining time with other coursework. Please let Lori Farwell know if you are available to participate in this class. 4. Transportation Update. There are a number of items to report to you, as noted below: • Tarrant County Bond Program — As you know, Tarrant County has proposed a program to meet critical infrastructure needs across the county through the shared financing of strategically significant transportation projects. County staff presented information on the program at the Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition meeting held this morning. A copy of the presentation is attached. In addition to providing an overview of the bond program, they also provided a list of local thoroughfare projects and on- system projects that have been approved for funding by the Commissioner's Court, should the bond program pass. A copy of the list is also included in your packet. Note that the White Chapel project was approved for funding. The County will provide $2,185,000 of the estimated $4,370,000 needed to widen this arterial from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from Highland to Emerald. The Pearson project and FM 1938 were not approved for funding, although it is very possible these projects will be funded through the NCTCOG's Partnership 3 program. Additionally, the Court reserved approximately $40 million of the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 13 of 41 total package for discretionary use, so it is possible that one of our projects could be selected as a discretionary project. The Commissioner's Court is now turning its attention to the bond election. Commissioner Glen Whitley has offered to coordinate presentations to Councils, community groups, and others who are interested in learning more about the bond program. We plan to contact him about making an appearance during one of your meetings, as well as presenting information through SPIN on March 28. We will also contact other groups that we work with about the possibility of hosting a program to get the information out. • Regional Transit Initiative — Discussions continue on this important topic. You may recall that HB 2702, passed during the regular 79 legislative session, established a committee that brings together state and local elected officials to address the regional transit initiative during the interim. The next meeting of this group is scheduled for 10 a.m. on March 17 at the Irving Arts Center. I plan to attend this meeting, and will be happy to take anyone with me that would like to attend. A subcommittee of the Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition has recommended to the full membership two position statements requesting the Legislature to 1) exempt from the local sales tax cap one half cent of the sales tax levied for transit in non - attainment areas of the state, and 2) authorize an advisory referendum in North Texas asking voters if they support levying a one half cent sales tax to build and operate the regional rail plan adopted by the MPO. This initiative has not been without some controversy, as the details continue to be discussed. However, the policy committee studying this issue repeatedly points out that the basic question of how to fund a transit initiative has to be discussed first. The transit plan and other details will be discussed and debated subsequently. • NCTCOG Funding — We have not yet been formally notified on the status of any of our applications for funding, but did notice that the Northeast Transit Study project we Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 14 of 41 submitted was included on the staff recommendations list. We will keep you posted on our success with the projects we have submitted. • FM 1709 Medians — I recently spoke to TxDOT District Engineer Maribel Chavez about the possibility of medians on FM 1709 and whether or not the state might be willing to assist us with the construction funding. Below is an excerpt of an e -mail I received from her earlier this week: I appreciate your efforts to incorporate raised medians into FM1709. We believe that this addition will provide for a safer and better managed environment for the traveling public and the adjacent properties. We are committed to working with the City of Southlake to provide a properly engineered design that will provide business access and a safer facility. I don't believe we have enough time to provide for thorough public involvement and include striped medians into the scheduled pavement resurfacing project. However I will do everything I can to secure funding from other sources for a raised median project and at adding landscaping to those medians. I will explore this and formally respond to you. Again, I very much appreciate your recognition that raised landscaped medians can be beneficial both to good economic growth and for the safety of the consumers. This is also extremely helpful as we try to extend the life of our transportation facilities by managing congestion, minimizing conflicts and promoting safety all the while providing a more aesthetically pleasing roadway. We will continue to work with TxDOT on this issue. Contact me with questions on any of these issues. 5. Council Meeting Agenda Management. As we have discussed at various points during the past year, development - related activity has increased, and we continue to pursue a number of important city projects. As such, agendas have become larger and meetings longer. Staff is Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 15 of 41 sensitive to this issue and has implemented a number of ideas to move the meetings along. Nonetheless, we continue to have the challenge as last meeting demonstrated. To work to improve the situation, we have used Lori's log notes system to document each agenda item and its length. This is helpful because it shows how meeting time is being used. Your packet contains the analysis for both the February 7 and February 21 meetings. The following list shows some of our current initiatives, as well as new ideas for improving the flow of the meetings: Agenda Item Current Initiatives New Ideas Executive Session Manage schedule by including Hold ES only when needed, not only those items whose timing every meeting. requires the discussion. Finalize each presentation with Use PowerPoint presentations to "options" page so Council can focus the discussion. easily settle on direction to take. Worksession Presentations on consent items Include consent presentations in only when required by Council. packet. Review list of consent items by group, rather than reading each and asking whether presentation is needed. Begin worksessions earlier. Regular Session Streamlined staff presentations. Presentations in packet; further streamline presentations. Minimize reports to only those needed; schedule accordingly. Limit time allocated to public comments (e.g., 5 minutes). Use point system to limit number of development cases Don't begin any new item after placed on any agenda. certain time (e.g., 11:30 p.m.) Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest City Council meeting March 7, 2006 Page 16 of 41 These are just a few ideas, I'm sure there are others to consider. I hope that we can work together to develop a more efficient meeting process to minimize the inconvenience and discomfort for all involved. Please let me know if you have ideas we should place on the list. Attachments • Log Cabin Update letter from councilmembers Hill and Muzyka • Tarrant County Bond Program presentation • List of local thoroughfare projects and on- system projects —approved by Commissioners Court • Time analysis of the February 7 and 21 city council meetings SKY Staff Direct Phone Numbers: Baker, Ken, Director of Planning, 748 -8067 Blagg, Jim, Assistant City Manager, 748 -8601 Farwell, Lori, City Secretary, 748 -8016 Gregg, Gary, IT Manager, 748 -8086 Hugman, Kevin, Director of Human Resources, 748 -8193 Jackson, Sharen, Finance Director, 748 -8042 Last, Greg, Director of Economic Development, 748 -8037 Polasek, Steve, Director Community Services, 748 -8018 Price, Robert, Public Works Director, 748 -8097 Smith, Rick, Director of DPS, 748 -8108 Thatcher, Ben, Assistant to the City Manager, 748 -8005 Yelverton, Shana, City Manager, 748 -8001 City of Southlake, Texas MEMORANDUM February 28, 2006 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Council Members Laura Hill and Virginia Muzyka SUBJECT: Log Cabin Committee Update Please join us in expressing our sincere gratitude to the Citizens who volunteered countless hours to serve you on the Log Cabin Committee. * The 13 residents appointed by our Council met for the first time in December and every two weeks in January and February, not to mention upcoming budget/planning meetings in March. * Members spent over 14 hours in meetings plus additional hours touring potential sites. * This diverse group gave 100% to this directive from Council. All discussions and votes were open, candid and professional. The weighted criteria "forced ranking" system worked effectively and impartially. I know each of you will join us in thanking this fine group of citizens for accomplishing the goal Council set forward. As Co- Chairs of the Log Cabin Committee we are pleased to present you with an update on the current status of the Committee work performed to date, as well as background information on the process. Following a thorough and impartial review process the Log Cabin Committee at their February 20, 2006 meeting selected Summit Park as the recommended location for placement of the log cabin. A sub - committee is currently undertaking the design and budgeting aspect of the process and an artist has been commissioned to provide a color rendering of the cabin as it might appear on the site. We anticipate presenting a full report to the City Council at your upcoming April 4, 2006 meeting. From a historical perspective, at the December 6, 2005, City Council meeting the Log Cabin Committee was established by Ordinance No. 05 -074 with the following general scope of work: - recommend a location for the placement of the historic log cabin as well as potential inclusion of other suitable historic features - develop a master plan for the placement and programming of the log cabin and other potential historical features - develop a conceptual plan for the layout of the log cabin and site amenities - provide detailed cost estimates for log cabin restoration and site amenities - provide a color rendering of the restored log cabin - investigate potential joint opportunities for planning, construction, and operations - present a final report to City Council with recommendations to include the information listed above within 60 to 90 days The Committee met for the first time on December 15, 2005 to review the scope of work as requested by City Council, develop a base list of potential sites for placement of the log cabin, and establish some general site criteria by which the locations could be scored. The Committee members were encouraged to explore the sites listed and investigate and suggest other potential locations for inclusion prior to the January 12, 2006 meeting. As a result, a total of eighteen sites were initially identified by the Committee and reviewed in terms of their positive aspects and challenges. The potential locations and site criteria were also scored individually by each Committee member from one (1) to three (3) with the low number being the most favorable. From this initial scoring the potential site locations were pared down and the site criteria weighted. From the initial scoring, the top four sites selected included Bicentennial Park (Bunker Hill), Bicentennial Park (west side), Summit Park, and Noble Oaks Park. Given that the timeframe for development of the west side of Bicentennial Park is several years out the Committee choose to eliminate this site from further consideration. The weighted criteria was then utilized to score the remaining three sites. The top two sites (Bicentennial Park — Bunker Hill and Summit Park) were carried forward in the process while Noble Oaks Park was eliminated. In preparation for ranking the final two locations, the Committee toured the Bicentennial Park and Summit Park sites at their February 6, 2006 meeting. The site visits provided the Committee members an opportunity to better explore the feasibility of each location and discuss various aspects in more detail. Using twenty site selection criteria developed and weighted by the Committee (see attached), Bicentennial Park and Summit Park were individually scored by each of the thirteen Committee members at their February 20, 2006 meeting. Summit Park scored a 20.9 (414 total points) and Bicentennial Park scored a 21.6 (429 total points) with the lower score being the more favorable location. A copy of the Site Selection Worksheet is attached for your information. We are very pleased with the open and uniform process utilized by the Committee and greatly appreciate the time, effort, and input put forth by all of the members. You are welcome to contact either of us at your convenience should you have any questions or desire additional information regarding the work performed by the Log Cabin Committee. Cc: Log Cabin Committee Members Shana Yelverton, City Manager Jim Blagg, Assistant City Manager Sites Considered f c i e n t e n 5 n u i to 6 m I t t t a Site Selection Worksheet k a r, k l u T tt o k W � rk r S 2 i i u a � e Criteria used D9tri tiort Wei htin Tpn�l Security 3.4% 24 1.7 37 Visiblli 410% 19 17 35 Ease aF access welkin /car faun 3.5°fo 14 19 33 Par$dng 5.1% 22 24 46 Ta ra t S5% W °8 38 Drainage 5,795 17 i3 3 0 Cost of site development s.3% lb i7 33 ProxImity to destination location 513%5 27 15 42 Hand] ca 2 Acces sibiljtZ 4,4% 27 1 25 47 Potential for Future rowth expansion r• 4% 20 26 46 Fit for setting 3.S% 25 22 47 5aP for running/playing children 3.4% 24 22 42 Settl consist with cabin era 5.9% 22 21 43 Sites hi5toria Signi ficance 6.4% 2 1 19 40 Additional area for su farthing plot 5.3% 21 30 51 Promote tourlsm 5.9% 31 24 51 Fits #�# d5 art of educa se tting /arel# 5.5% 21 23 44 A Bat to visitors 3.6% 24 19 43 Sher Istkc pvsltive Empact an attendance to 4.9% 24 24 48 adjacent facilities J entities Positive impact on adjacent land awners/residentsl 511% 23 23 46 or busirsesSes RNMEMMEM Criteria Scoring Fxerc se Summary C!rilteri Sewn# Visibility Fast qr "Gags w &Ikin carjbvs Parking1 M u x Y k a L 1 x N I r 1 i 1 2 t n h C n s D n Y t lr Committee Member r R r E o a P p t n e I e h d t' . e e m K e v If b ? e r r � e I i t n a B o c L! 4 3 r r 1' 2 . , 1 1 2 21 11 1 2 2 E fl — 1 I 1 I 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 C o o I 2 y 1 1 1 2 " i i I $ 7 9 1 3 G a I I Fr f 2 2 2 TQ. l Aver&ae 16 1 -2 19 ;,s 17 1.3 24 1.$ 70 ran 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2b 2.0 Oraln 2 2 ! 1 2 2 f 3 3 2 2 2 3 27 2,1 A Costafsite p'vF,'i it -t'rtt E Z 2 2 1 f 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 25 L.9 Pr#xlmi t4 dest lora9*_I�±n 2 3 1 3 L 2 2 3 L 1 1 3 2 25 11$ Ha Accessil�; lit_+ k 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 21 1,6 s , _. = .- F t Fpr[ 2 2 1 1 1 2 L 2 2 1 1 1 1 !B 1.4 Safer for runni t W in ch.iidren 1 1 d 1 2 1 1 1 i 1 f 1 2 16 1 - 2 5etti consistent wlth cabin Era 2 3 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 3 1 2 3 j 26 2 - 2 SIWS hlstprkal si nrflcanc2 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 3 9 31 1 21 31 30 2.3 '{ .. :.:3 - Prompte tourism 2 2 2 Ll 2 3 3 l 1 2 3 3 24 2.2 Fits In as part of edUCOt ortai setts area 3 3 Z 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 21 28 2.0 Appea t4 +kisjtogs i 2 1 2 E 1 1 1 = t 1 1 3 17 1.3 S oa. i5tic ibve Im act on atLendance to 1 1 2 3 2 2 ! 2 2 2 d 2 2 23 1,$ ad aaenk racilities entliles Posine Irn act On &d &cent landownerslre5lden ? 3 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 1 1 2 24 1.8 or businesses Totals 472 jftgZ4gt ' '1" is most Important - 2° is rmkrataly irripprwnt .3w is ieBSt important 2006 TRANSPORTATION BOND PROGRAM larch 1 2006 2006 Transportation Bond Program --=IL The Cha Tarrant County continues to grow rapidly, placing a burden on the available transportation infrastructure * Over 1.6 million people currently reside in Tarrant County Tarrant County is the fastest growing county in the MPO region e Local governments struggle to meet transportation capacity demands e Roadway construction costs continue to rise e Air quality concerns require congestion mitigation 2006 Transportation Bond Program Purl2ose To meet critical infrastructure reeds across Tarrant County through the shared financing of strategically significant transportation projects. Program Coals Assist municipalities in funding local projects for which full funding is unavailable Leverage state and federal funding sources to advance local and on-system projects Participate in funding road and bridge projects related to the implementation of a strategic rail initiative ® Improve air quality through the cooperative funding of intersection improvements 2006 Transportation Bond Program Program Schedule June 2005: Commissioners Court approves trans. bond program policy June 2005: Staff notifies cities of upcoming bond program and seeks candidate projects July 2005: Staff meets with representatives from the Cities, FWTA and NCTCO — letters are written from staff and Judge Aug. 2005: Tarrant County receives 129 project submittals Sept. 2005: Tarrant County hires Freese and Nichols to assist with bond program management Sept. to Jars. 2006: Project Evaluation Committee completes project ranking and final project recommended list Jan. 31, 2006: Commissioners Court approves recommended list and allocates funding for ors- system projects 2006 Transportati . ! >: Summa!y of Candidate Projects ® Submitted costs for candidate projects total over $540 million ® 113 Local Thoroughfare projects submitted 0 16 on- System projects submitted 54 - Road v idenings 20- New Roads 41 - Intersection Improvements S - New Trails 2 - Road Realignments 1 - Road Reconstruction 1 - Study 1 - Transportation Information System 1 - Hazmat Sensor Installation 2006 Transportati Bond Program ---------- --- - I..... 20 municipalities chose to submit projects for consideration in this program: Arlington 0 burst • Azle ® Keller enbrook Kennedale olleyville 0 Mansfield Euless a North Richland Hills o Everman a Richland Hills Fort forth Saginaw a Grand Prairie southlake Grapevine Watauga 0 Haltom City Westlake 7 � 2006 Transportation Bond Program • The Project Evaluation Committee (PEC) was composed of 15 informed citizens and transportation professionals • The County Commissioners and Judge appointed 3 committee members each ® There was excellent attendance and participation by the committee members m Meetings were held on: September 15, 2005 September 29, 2005 October 20, 2005 November 17, 2005 December 1, 2005 January 5, 2006 2006 Transportation Bond Program The PE C determined the Project Selection Criteria that would meet program policy goals and a weighting factor was applied to the composite score of each criteria u Congestion Mitigation a Strategically Significant a Air Quality Improvement a County Funding Participation Cost Efficiency Project Ranking Criteria Safety Enhancement Time to Implement stat. Aar Comy Cc9i Elt. Safety Tme io M t Sig. cKohly Part. kmp. 7 ;4� r . : 2006 Transportation Bond Program Conceptual Funding Breakdown* Total Dollars Available: 200 million (max.) Discretionary Dollars: 20% 40 million Road/Bridge Project Dollars Relating to Transit initiative: 10 20 million On- System Project Dollars: 0% 40 million Local Projects: 50 $100 million Total: 100% * Funding levels shown are preliminary and subject to change by the Tarrant County Commissioners Court _ 2Q06 Transportation Bind Program Summary of Recommended P Local Arterial Widening s 30 $224 million Intersection Improvements: million New Roadways: : million Can- System Projects: is 0 million Transit Project: 1 $330 million (bond program funds related road and bridge projects only Total Estimated Cost of Projects: $797 million Total County Funding Required: $160 million loo million (lo-cal) +$40 million (state) +$2_o million (transit) 2006 Transportation Bond Program ;��L 2006 Transportation Bond Program Contact I R andy Skinner Transportation Planner Tarrant County Phoney 817 -884 -1653 Email: rvskinner@tarrantcounty.com Renee Lamb Director of Transportation Services Tarrant County Phone: 817 - 854 -1173 Email: rlamb@tarrantcounty.com TARRANT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION BOND PROGRAM COURT APPROVED LOCAL THOROUGHFARE PROJECTS Projer;l Numtcr City Project Type Location From To Proj ®MD— riptlan Suhtrltted Cant Requested Funding 1 North Richland HiIRS I : nen_ng Nort Tar it Pa*x Prednct Li •w Davis Clly limits Tlnity blvd Whi[I Widen arterial Widen arteial Tram 2 lanes to 4 tones Widen arterial S 12,462,000 1 10,039.000 $ 21,590,000 $ $ _2,729,073 $ 10,795,079 2 Fort Worth North Richland ! ?fills: :feller _ ............. North Richland :•fills ._— 'Ric.nmg SH10 8 . ... Wieenih Widening North Tarranl Parkway Davis to Wliillay 5555... . Davis -3555_ ..... East Rosedale. ........._ Davis 4 Err.erald Ili :ls Slalnes Widen art irom erial iro 51-1. 71anes 5 1,450,000 S 150,0,:1] 5 Fort Warih Fort Warih Widening : :._.__- Jill IH3 -'.: .... .. Hrll,.ni 111620 Widen artedet irom 2 lanes 104 lanes Ptus ROW S 26,51il $ 7,994,000 B W caning Lllereed r Wide inq Golden Tri - gi. 113377 Widen arterial irom 2lanes re 4lanes $ 14,608000 $ 7,300,000 7 ._._� Colleyville Ja Rd at Cheek Sp.� _ -csl Broad Street Inlersection improvements S 741il 5 374,940 B Mansfield Day War Widen arterial irom 2lanes m 4lenes(dv, r&g) $ 3,475.157 $ 1,737,579 9 Grand Prairie Yom Lane _ Great $ou7hwe_vt Plm:g - ..... ....__ Davis at Mld C '. :cz ' H 1 hlilwer Atld turn lanes at IH -20 Intersec0ons (EB 8 W BI & 1,700,375 S 221,049 10 Ryrth Richland Miss Inleroeotion M;d -Cities ........ ,. 11-12D IH35 Irdersvxhon lmpravements W Iden arterial from S lanes fo 7lanas S 1,500,000 S 93,152,000 5 259,000 $ w,n,noa 71 Noun Rlchlantl HiIL4 5 5 -3. __� 5-3-355 Widening Rufe Snow — -3-355 12 Arnnglon Wlderang _ - ......_— m Springs Bowan Sprin Ailin9lon city limits W [den anerlal from 2lanes lo 4lanes d 1,859,400 S 892.573 $ 3,32uaD $ 1d:6,na; 12 Fort Worth Arlington Grand Praine — rg East Hc s ?da'c Greer.Cek U5287 Ballpark Way W lden arterial Imm 4 lanes to 5 lanes Widen arterial horn 4 lanes to 5 lanes S iB.515,000 $ 2,198,200 14 Widen rig _ Lincnlr. - .,.,..- Great Southwest Pkwy 19 W idenin .. _._..._.— -3555. Lake 1l rl !m P-r 555-3 l7ehUle t Stadium 5555. Green Daks North tddga • Joe Pool' Widen arterial Irom 4 lanes to B lanes $ 4,528.63.0 S 2.314.373 5555 3 5 1.74500x; - „ 5 s,e °g60•a S 2.'d0 : 000 1B Mansfield Widening Mall Eastern city limns Widen eA.Nal from 2 lanes to d lanes jdW, Cox) 5555 S 2 375 7C0 17 Arlin n Arin Widening Chapman Cutoff Division Widen areial ho 4lano5 to 5lanes S 3625 Sip _- & 3,816.00p 5 -7 - ,x0(0 18 W idenin 9 Ban di Way y sH3s0 ._......... widen artorlar ho:1 �� lanes to 5lanes 19 .- 20 ..... Fort Worth A - !mgion Widening East First Sheet 8aach Oakland Kelly Eilipll a riai _- 'r,' :derrderio snit tares to 4lanes Vd'.den an_cal it ^rnGla'ies'[r 5 lanes 7 Vr'idc :l arL,ial frcn 41a-1es la B fanii Wkiening pleasanl Ridge eowen $ 9,c L $ 4.:35,000 27 22. A-in 1. 9 Widening Matlock t Mayfield Rardin E 2 ?5 2C� $_- 77t7,67? c 3900 8 'Ai!3,000 Grapcvira - Widening 8830 Pro Daye SHO SH12t - __- 23 Arlin :.;o� N. 4aad I:'ts —.ai on Collins souLleasi Pkvry __.�.. Marls_illlld WebO Curstruut new arterie7 shall of future6Lanes --- 5.2 -3..0 .................... $ IOS2E,G07 ..� �$ 8,C91,50D 24 Nodh R,6 ••.'il :; Grapevine Hwy el Harwood Inlerse tlun Improvements $ 2,887,000 $ 233,500 25 Cal =ynlh Ir[srsaClion John IkCam at Pleasant Run inlerssction Improvemenls $ 402,718 $ 201,359 26 27 Er., —, Euless '1uw Road Dvercld U Pacilip ROW FM 11 1F135RH2O intgrrhenge Carrseuuf new arterial $ 330,000 S 1,870,000 $ 155,000 S 635,000 Extension Gateway Boultrverd Cenhdon t3oulevard Glade Road Extend 4 lam.Eton anginal 23 214 Widening White Crape[ - H'jhland Emerald Widen artarlal from 2 lanes to 4lanes $ 4,370,000 $ 2,185,000 29 Saginaw Wide. ng Longhorn Did Decatur 8uslmse 287 Witlen arenal Imm 3lenes 10 6 lanes (dil $ 10,700,000 S 5,350,000 30 Colleyvllle intersection Martin at Cheek Sparger Sublon Intersection Improvements $ 511,083 $ 255,542 31 Kenmdati Widening Little l lRoad Arlington city knits Widen arterial irom 2 lanes to 4 lanes $ 1,r,23, 1 GO $ 1.761,575 32 Axl NEW Road Denier hail Current Denver Trail Ash ConstrucE new 2lane aflerl § 4,550,2-07 $ 2,425,000 33 Kennedale Widening Little School Road Suslness 267 north 5,750 feat Widen adeiial hom 2 lanes to 4 lanes S 4,526.930 $ 2,203,450 34 35 Grand Prairie New Road Lynn G 5H360 take Ridge Pkwy construct new 4lane undivided arterial _ $ 7,220,500 $ 3,510,250 Mansliew New Road Harltkge i ",kway Union Pacific Railroad Cotton Mallook Reya New consinnfjon of 4lam arterial Wid_s_n arterial irom 2lanes t0 41a11ea (Done) S 5p 50 _.. 2_ 2213. 5,353 ........ -. S ,6 S 2.017,725 $ 1,14Z977 35 Mans5ekl Wldrning Was, broad lineal 37 Mansfield Widening Callender U3267 Tumer Wamelf Wl remF irom 2 lades to 4 larres(e6g) $ 2,058,122 $ 1,029,551 38 WelangN Widening Slam[.: __ Bogart S",e[ _. _ _ Indian tl SP rigs BH377 Widen aderial1mm 21anea 10 41anea S 2,140,476 S 1,070,739 39 c0eyvile Widening Pleasant Run Precinct Line SH28 _ East city kmlta 'Widen :".'fiat arc-rial tram 2lanes to 4 lanes - an¢dal irom 4 lanes to 49aras; W median Add turn lanes at Mayfield Intersectlon $ 6a5,943 $ 332,972 40 Hurst Widsirl ..._.._ 555-3. ... _. Pipeline S 11,412,731 S 566,746 S 1,141,273 5 283,373 41 Grand Plaids Turn Lanes _ Greer•. Eo1r`i r;r�s: tN.va 42 Arlinglon Inlersecllar. _ Mai lcc's-r uay7i?I _. '.3Gwran l 3u inua ._..__.. .__. 1-do rom Intarsectlon lmprpvernen10 $ 471,890 $ 227,500 43 Kennedale WldenMeanr 5555. Dlek'riee _ ..__ SH290 Pennsylvanla Witlen arterial In 2lanes to 4lanes (realign) $ 4,365,400 $ 2,1B2,7a0 44 Arlington Widening Arlington cily limits 1WIden arterial hom 4loneo to 6Inn" S 7,387,500 $ 3,549,750 S 282,970,045 $ 97,202,172 Page 1 of 2 Current as of February 2006 TARRANT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION BOND PROGRAM COURT APPROVED ON SYSTEM PROJEC Project Number city Project Type Location From To Project Desorlption Submitted cast Requested Funding I Fort Worth Widening FM 1187 IH35W Oak Grove Rd. Widen arterial from 2lanes to 4 lanes $ 6,760,000 $2,250,000 2 .Fort Worth lmprvrunt IH35W North IH820 US287 Widen to Blanes and improve ramps $ 91,700,000 $10,000,000 a .Euless Intersection SH10 - Various Locations Intersection improvements w1 atomic clack system $ 125,000 $82,500 4 GmpeAne Widening SH26 Fool SH114 Widen arterial from 4 lanes to 6 laces $ 27.470,132 $10,400,000 a Fort Worth Intersection SH183 - Various Locations Intersection Improvements at nine locations $ 1,170,000 $565,000 6 Grand Prairie Tum Lanes MayFleld al SH360 Add turn lanes at intersection $ 975,000 397,500 7 Grand Prafrla Signal SH3601 Web Lynn at New York Ave. Add Signal at Webb Lynn Int, t4 NY Ave1Ad W b Brit $ 160,000 $60,000 6 Mansfield New Road US237 Frontage Walnut Creek East Broad Construct rrontape roads and bridges $ 3,441,600 $4,720,800 9 Arington Irdersaction Nodh Callins at Careen Oaks North Collins at Green Oaks $ 244,520 $11 8,000 10 Arlington Intersection North Collins at Road to Six Flags North Collins at Road to Six Flags $ 2442,200 $117,500 11 .Arlington Intersecdon South Cooper at Green Oaks South Cooper at Green Oaks $ 517,360 $248,000 12 Arlington Intersection Cooper at Mayfield Cooper at Mayfield $ 149.460 $72,750 13 Benbrpok Widening US377 lH2D Wlnsma Widen arterial to 6lenes wIM median S 13,174,416 $1,902,441 l FOrl Worth Aealignmenl FMi56 E�9t1 ng FM156 Exist) FM156 Realign adedal around Alliance Airport $ 22,192,277 $5,100,000 r15 Mansfield €ntemectlon US287 at Walnut Creek Texas turnarourrds on US287 at Walrwt Creek $ 4,387,680 $2,193,840 Mansfield Intersection U6287 at E. Broad Texas turnarounds on US267 at E. Broad $ 1,6E2,520 $931,26 Rlchland Hflls rmprvmnt Baker Blvd. Booth Callaway SHED naconslruct arterial $ 14,000,DDO $9,430,000 $ 1Ba,572,165 5 37,279,591 City Council meeting e ruary 7, Time Agenda Ikea Description Duratton Totals in minutes 5:35 PM Mayor Called meeting to order and reviewed consent nda items 5 6:00 PM closed work session and called for an executive session 67 Total minutes fot.wwkse and efcecu Session 7:07 PM reconvened regular meeting, invocation, reports, proplarnations 23 7:30 PM Mayor read consent agenda items into the record 5 7.35 PM motion for consent agenda t 7:35 PM public forum - no one spoke 0 :. .:. Total minutes for invocation, repo ft' consent agenda;..::. and uhiic forum... ,.. ;.... .:.....: ..............: <. .., 29 7 :35 PM 7A, Stonsbridge Park, ZCP Staff preseRta5on 2 7.38 PM Applicant presentation and questions 8 7.45 PM public hearing opened 0 7:A5 PM resident spoke in favor 3 T49 PM pubric hearing closed (I 7'49 PM matron for Item 7A 1 :. .:......:.....:....:..::. .:. total minutes for Item 7A .::: ; ...14 7:50 PM 7B, Vermilion Cou Garden Offices, SP Staff presentab a 7 :58 PM Applicant presentation and questions 3 8 :09 PM public hearing opened and closed - no onesp 1 9:02 PIW motion for Item 7B 0 ..:.., ... :. . -. .... total mina# for Iffier 7i3 ........:'. :.. . ;:..; :..! .; .. '.... 12 8:02 PIM 70, warship facility for St. John's Church Staff presentation 2 City Council meeting February 7, 2006 8:04 PM public hearing opened and closed 0 B:D4 PM motion for (tern 7C; 1 total minutes for Iterri 7C 3 8:05 PM Mayor called for a break 19 8:24 PM Mayor reconvened meeting 0 79 8:24 PM 7❑ & 7E, Grand Avenue Staff ELe for both 71] & 7E 3 827 PMI ARpljQanl presentation and questions 34 x:01 PME pub6c hearing opened and closed 0 9:01 PM motion for Item 7D 3 8:04 PM motion for Item 7E '1 WWI minutes.€nr Eierrs 713 & 71 =:..: 41 9 :G5 PM 7F & 7G, Town Square Sign Variances Staff resentation for bath 7F & 7G 3 9:08 PM Council discussion 1 9:09 PM motion for Item 7F 3 9:12 PM motion for Item 7G 0 :...: ...... ......:: :. to& minutes far item 7F & .,.................. 9:12 PM 7H, Grand Avenue landscaping Staff presentation 2 9:14 PM Applicant presentation and questions 4 9.1 B PM! mof& for Item 7H 1 ...... ..:.. .:..... . :......... total Minutes for Item 7i-) ..... ....:.................:. 7 9:99 PM 71, Brownstone Developer's Agmt amendment Staff presentation 4 9:23 PM Applicant presentation, questions from Council, CQUncil deliberation 34 City Council meeting Feb 9 :57 PM motion for Item 71 6 total rrti€iutes #or Item 71:: 44 10:03 PMI Mayor called for a break 10 10 :13 PM Mayor or reconvened the meeting 2 total r�ninutes.for break' 12 10.15 PMj 10A, Shops of 5outhlake conditional sign permit Staff presentaUon 6 10:21 PM Applicant resentation and questions from Courictl 41 11:02 PM motion for Item 10A 4 :......:...:..:.: total minutes for Item 10A ..:. .:: :..;...:..:- .:...: :........, -51 11.48 PM 1OB, & IOD Slops of of S ao #hlake la Staff tntrodtrtion to Shops of Southlake items and detail for Item 10C 11 11:17 PM Staff prese ntation for Item 108 10 11:27 PM Staff presentation for Itern 1 OP 6 11:33 PM motion for Item 1 OB 1 11:34 PM Matlon for Iteim 1 OC 1 11:35 PM motion for Item 1 OD 1 :...:.... tolal.rrtiriutes for Iterns 108, 14G;:& 14C .... .;..:.:.. 30 11:36 PM 1 108, Sign variance for Aventerra Staff presentation 4 11:40 ISM Applicant presentation, questions from Council, and Council deliberation 14 11:54 PM motion for Item 1DE 1 total minutes for item 10E :13 11:65 PM IOF, Sign variance for Shoo FavifIon Staff presentation 6 Gity Cauraa meeting February 7, 2QB 22 12:01 AM A cant presentation, ouestians Iron) Courld. and Council deiiberatiun 12: 23 AIM motion bf It -3m ICF 2 i �— total minutes f Item 1 OF: 30 12:25 AM 10G, Sign variance for Capital One i f Staff Presantatb.rl C 12:25 ANN ppllcarnt pretientation, questions from Council ana Council deliberation 11 12:35 AM motion for Item 10G 1 - total r jnute5''f& It6in 10C 12 12; AM Mayor adj o urned me-b 1n , Total minutes for Februa 7. 100E meedrio 4021 CRy Council meetin Fi tbruary 21, 2008 Total minutes for inuocdon, yepwts, consent agenda: and.puh]lc 7A, Shops of SOLAhlake SP St pwantatlon fo r first regular acier:da i=am 8:13 FP+i 7 20` _— Applicant prazentation ann queMms 8:20 PM 8:40 PM Rucliz hearinq apemen 1 8:41 PM let speaker 3 8:44 PM 2nd speaker 2 8:46 PM 3rd speaker 3 public hearing closed Council dellberatlon 8:49 PM 4 8:49 PM 37 - -- - -- -- -- -- - - - -- I - - - - -- - motlon for Item 7A 9:28 PM Total minutes For ftern 7A .. .:: 74 9:29 P V. 7E3- Shaps of Southlake noise variance motion to deny Item 7B 0 0 9.29 FOP ", 70, Zoning Change to SFAA Staff presenUion City Council meeting E rue 8:35 PM putAic hearing opened - -? — 9:35 pm one spe aker, public headng closed motion for Rem 70 __ -- 6 9 :37 PM Total inhales for.lterrr 7D .> 9.37 PM 7E, Ordinance ainendment regarding sanitary sewer im nave Staff presentation __ L 9 PM public hearkig opened 9:41 PM 1st speaker 7 9:48 PM 2nd speaker 4 9:52 PM 3rd s eaker 5 9:58 Pfd motlon totahle Itcrn 7E 7 I' Total:; inutes for Wm YE 3 -159 P Mayor called 'Dr L� b; uak :mC stated he will not be presiding over Rem 8A Mayor Pro Tern C31Jed m eeting back to orde 1 1 1018 PM 18� Total mlriutesfor break ...........: -. .. 10;17 PM 8A, Bells Laqu, 1st ReadMg Staff prgsentaflon 11 .. - -..� 10:28 PM Applicant resentatian and _ questions 19 10;47 PM Ma Pr Pro Tarn read Comment Cards and alk wed publIc comment 13 11;00 PM 1 st speaker 0 11:05 PM 2nd 3,eaker 7 91:13 PM 3rd speaker 15 1 1,28 PM 4th speaker 6 11:34 PM 5th speaker 5 11,39 PM 6th speaker 30 12,09 AM 17th speaker 1 r 12,OR AM T 8 th s p eaker 1 1214AM a pI ica 'i t's alo rney s oke - - - -- 5 12 AH !%IaYcr Pro Ter- called an axac.tive session 17 co Cound rnee February 27 2006 12:32 AM Ma r P ro Tern reconvened meetin -M._, ,..._....---- ._..... U ...... ... ' 33 AM motlon to deny Item 8A 137 Total mini W for Ito ni 34.:.....; : :. -- - ........... 2;33 A'�1 -.. - - - - M or Pro Tern called for a break 5 .. .................. 12;38.4`JI Ma crreconvanedmr - l hg 0 Ta}fal minutds 12:38 AM $B, Hawthorne Place ZCP Staff presentafion 7 12:45 AM Appilcant p resentabon and questlong dam CnUncp 48 7:33 AM motion to approve km 88 1 -,, Total minutes fDr Item 8a .......... .... 56 1:34 ANI 9C, C�rrnll Crossroads, ZCP Staff preSenWion 15' 7:49 AM licant e resentation and questicrE fray. Cour..a 37 2:26 AFB r OUM to approve Item BG 4 Total rninutes for item ECG I i 2:30 AM 10A, Sign Variance for Stampede Sports Staff pmserdatjori 2:34 AM Applicant presontalion and questions from Councii 2;43 AM mctia:- for Item 10A G Taal mirotes for Item tOA ......... :..... �. .: ' ::.. .. ... 13 243 AM meeting ad`ourned Tote) minutes fc�r February 21. 200B meetin 54T