Item 4BCity of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
March 1, 2006
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, City Manager
SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting
March 7, 2006
4A. Mayor's Report:
1. Southlake Lions Club presentation - Pieter Andries Hye, representing the Southlake
Lions Club, is announcing the official creation of the Southlake Shield Foundation and
would like to honor Retired Chief of Police Marlin Price. Chief Price had the vision of
a foundation that would provide funds to the families of police officers or firefighters
who are injured or killed in the line of duty. The Southlake Lions Club took that vision
and created the Southlake Shield Foundation — set up to provide immediate funds of
assistance to the families of fallen officers or firefighters. The Southlake Lions Club
would also like to unveil a glass plaque honoring Chief Price for his vision and
dedication to his officers. Shhh ... we're surprising him!
2. Southlake Chamber of Commerce — Youth of the Year - Alex Clift was honored at this
year's Southlake Chamber of Commerce Annual Awards Luncheon as the Southlake
Youth of the Year. Alex displays a wealth of talents and interests. He is active in his
church, scout troop, and at Carroll Senior High School where he participates in the band
as a Section Leader and as a member of the National Honor Society. During his
freshman year, Alex set out to get to know his fellow students by wearing a nametag
every day and sitting with a different group of people at lunch. Now that he is a senior
in high school, Alex has ambitions to continue his educational and extracurricular
activities at the United States Air Force Academy. We are very pleased to have
someone of Alex's caliber representing our community and wish him all the best in his
future pursuits.
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 2 of 41
We are hoping that Alex will be able to join you at your upcoming Council meeting and
are still awaiting confirmation. If need be, this item may be transferred to your March
21 meeting.
4B. City Manager's Report: No further report is planned at this time.
4C. Parks and Recreation Board Report: Parks Board Chair Mary Georgia is scheduled to present
the Parks Board report at the City Council meeting.
5A. Approve the minutes for the February 13, 2006, City Council work session and the January 21,
2006, regular City Council meeting. The minutes have been included in your packet. Contact
Lori Farwell with questions on this item.
5B. Authorize the Mayor to execute two lease agreements with Metro PCS Texas, L.L.C., for the
placement of wireless communication antennas on the Bicentennial Park and Florence Water
towers. Staff has been negotiating with Metro PCS Texas, LLC, for two water tower lease
agreements. They are interested in installing a total of twelve cellular antennas on the
Bicentennial and Florence water towers. They will be implementing approximately 450 cell
sites in the DFW area, and the Bicentennial and Florence tower installations would be key in
providing cellular service throughout the Southlake area. These lease agreements have been
reviewed by the city attorney. Approval by City Council of these lease agreements would
generate over $60,240 per year for the City; possibly generating in excess of $1.5 million if
both contracts survive the overall 25 year term.
Contact Bob Price with questions on this item.
5C. Authorize the Mayor to execute a Residential Developer's Agreement for 1223 Woodsey Court
for the construction of approximately 985 linear feet of public sanitary sewer along Woodsey
Court. The developer has constructed a house at 1223 Woodsey Court, which is an existing lot
with a septic system. The developer has decided to extend public sewer instead of utilizing the
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 3 of 41
existing septic system and will construct 985 linear feet of off -site public sanitary sewer line.
This developer's agreement covers the construction of these public improvements.
Contact Bob Price with questions on this item.
5D. Authorize the Mayor to enter into a settlement agreement with Marcus Cable Associates,
L.L.C. d /b /a Charter Communications relating to the Consortium Cities audit of Charter
Communications. In 2003, several issues arose that led the City to join a consortium of cities
consisting of Fort Worth, Burleson, Benbrook, Duncanville, Hurst, Keller and North Richland
Hills. The consortium of cities believed that Charter was not correctly calculating outage
conditions in relation to the terms of the cable franchise agreement with the cities. Several
letters were sent to Charter notifying Charter of their alleged violation of the franchise
agreement.
In March 2004, the City Council agreed to participate in the coalition of cities with a payment
of $3,961 to fund an initial contribution toward legal and expert witness fees and other costs
associated with the formal hearing process. The hearing process was designed to recover
damages from Charter relating to the non - compliance with the customer service standards.
Charter has proposed a settlement agreement. The agreement acknowledges the cities disagree
on the methodology used to calculate abnormal operating conditions. It proposes new
standards to be observed by Charter. The standards, while extremely technical, will be easier
for the cities to be able to measure Charter's compliance.
Additionally, Charter has offered a community grant to each city. The grant proposed is based
on the percentage of customers Southlake had at the time of the initial complaint. Charter is
proposing $9,903 annually for a period of the next four years. The grant will not be deducted
from current franchise fees or passed on to their customers. The City Council will be able to
determine how this grant is spent each year.
Contact Gary Gregg with questions on this item.
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 4 of 41
5E. Ordinance No. 893, 1 st Reading, Establishing an additional penalty on Ad Valorem personal
property taxes which remain delinquent for more than 60 days after February 1 of any year.
Approval of the ordinance does two things. First, it changes the date on which a penalty is first
imposed to compensate the collection attorney for delinquent taxes on personal property as
permitted by state law. Second, it increases the penalty to compensate the collection attorney
from 15% to 20% as permitted by HB 490. This amendment would not have any financial
impact on the City, as the additional penalty is paid by the delinquent taxpayer. All costs for
delinquent tax collections are borne by the law firm, resulting in a "cost free" collection
program for the City. Approval of Ordinance No. 893 will require an amendment to the current
contract with the attorneys and staff will bring the amendment with the 2nd reading of the
ordinance.
Contact Sharen Jackson with question on this item.
5F. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P., for audit
services. The City Charter requires the City at the close of each fiscal year to have an
independent audit performed by a certified public accountant. Weaver and Tidwell L.L.P.
serve as the city's independent auditors. As outlined in the agreement, the cost of the financial
audit is not to exceed $65,000.
Contact Sharen Jackson with questions on this item
Note that your packet disk includes the planning presentation in an audio format. To view with
audio double click the icon and make sure your speakers are on. The audio slide show has been
developed to help you prepare for the meeting. Please give us your feedback so we'll know
whether to continue this practice. Also, note that the presentations will be updated before
Tuesday if anything changes.
7A. Ordinance No. 480 -479, 2nd Reading_(ZA05 -154), Zoning Change and Concept Plan for
proposed Hawthorne Place on approximately 10 acres located along the east side of Randol
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 5 of 41
Mill Avenue approximately 1 feet north of Johnson Road, being legally described as Tracts
IE, 1E01, 1D01, and a portion of Tract 1D02, Ben J. Foster Survey, Abstract No. 519. Current
Zoning: AG Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: SF -20A Single Family Residential
District. SPIN Neighborhood #13. PUBLIC HEARING. This property is located at 515 - 565
Randol Mill Ave. The concept plan shows a total of 17 lots, with 16 of the lots being for new
single - family residential construction. The average lot size is 24,000 square feet. The proposal
does not comply with the low density residential land use designation which recommends
detached single - family residential development not exceeding a net one dwelling unit per acre.
The net density of the proposed development is 1.6 dwelling units per acre. The applicant has
provided his justification for the development which is included as part of attachment C in the
staff report.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5 -0) on February 9; subject to
concept plan review summary #3, dated February 3, and accepting the applicant's willingness
to limit any fencing to wrought iron
The City Council approved the first reading (4 -3) on February 21, subject to the Planning and
Zoning Commissions recommendation, subject to submitting an entry feature plan, and noting
that the detention pond is to also be a retention pond. Deputy Mayor Pro Tern Morrison and
Council Members Hill and Jones dissented.
The only change since the first reading is the submission of an entry feature plan which is
included in your packet.
Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item.
7B. ZA05 -155, Preliminary Plat for proposed Hawthorne Place on property located along the east
side of Randol Mill Avenue approximately 1,200 feet north of Johnson Road. Current Zoning:
AG Agricultural District. Proposed Zoning: SF -20A Single Family Residential District. SPIN
Neighborhood #13. This is the plat associated with the previous agenda item. The plat is
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 6 of 41
consistent with the concept plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval subject to the plat review summary (5 -0) on February 9.
Note that a denial of the zoning would eliminate the need to act on this plat.
Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item.
7C. Ordinance No. 480 -480, 2 nd Reading_(ZA05 -068), Zoning Change and Concept Plan for
Southlake Crossroads (f.k.a. Carroll Crossroads) on property described as being a portion of
Tract 4G, O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, located at the southwest corner of East
Southlake Boulevard and South Carroll Avenue. Current Zoning: AG Agricultural District.
Requested Zoning: S -P -2 Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood 9 9e. PUBLIC
HEARING. This site is located on the south side of East Southlake Boulevard just west of the
Prade air strip and approximately 350 feet west of South Carroll Avenue. The plan proposes
the development of two retail buildings totaling approximately 27,100 square feet adjacent to
Southlake Boulevard and five office buildings totaling approximately 49,500 square feet on the
southern half of the site adjacent to the future Zena Rucker Road.
Under the "S -P -2" zoning the applicant proposes the following (see Attachment C)
• C -2 local - retail commercial district uses and development regulations to exclude the
following uses:
o Cleaners, laundries and /or laundromats; grocery stores and /or meat markets;
• Front Yard — not less than 30 foot along F.M. 1709. Not less than 20 foot for all other
streets;
• Floor Area — maximum area of 40,000 square feet per structure;
• Loading Spaces — no loading spaces shall be required for the development; and
• Architecture similar to renderings.
The following variances are being requested:
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 7 of 41
• Public Street R.O.W. — minimum 60 feet required, 50 feet right -of -way with 31 feet
pavement width proposed;
• Driveway Stacking — minimum 150 feet required, requesting as shown on concept plan;
and
• Driveway Spacing — minimum 500 feet required from Carroll Avenue.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5 -0) on February 9, subject to
the concept plan review summary #4 dated February 3 and subject to the following:
• noting that the permitted uses shall allow all C -2 uses with exception of laundromats,
grocery stores and meat markets;
• dry cleaners shall be limited to a maximum of 2,500 square feet with no on -site cleaning
or pressing processes;
• all buildings adjacent to the street must have store fronts facing the street;
• the east driveway on Southlake Boulevard must be right -in /right -out; and
• approving requested regulations and variances except as noted.
City Council approved the first reading (5 -2) on February 21, subject to the recommendations
of the Planning and Zoning Commission; subject to the concept plan review summary 94, dated
February 3; and noting the applicant has agreed to the following:
• 100% office on the southern parcel (lot) and will integrate design of southern parcel
with northern parcel;
• deleting the dry cleaner use;
• provide revised building elevations at second reading;
• the center landscape areas will have stone retaining wall;
• A minimum 5 foot high wrought iron fence to be provided adjacent to the air strip;
• If a retaining wall is required along the adjoining boundaries, establish a deed restriction
that will require removal of the retaining wall when properties develop;
• noting that a good job has been done in coordinating access between other parcels and
the adjoining properties;
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 8 of 41
Mayor Pro Tem Shankland and Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Morrison dissented
The proposed "S -P -2" uses, regulations, and plans have been submitted to address conditions of
the first reading approval and are included in your packet
The plan does not comply with the City's land use plan. This area has an underlying "Office
Commercial" designation with an optional T -1 on the north and T -2 on the south portion. Any
approval of this request as currently proposed must include justification. A justification letter
has been provided by the applicant and is included as part of attachment `C'.
There is opposition exceeding 20% of the surrounding property owners within 200 feet. A
super majority vote (6 of 7 City Council members) is needed to approve this request.
Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item.
7D. ZA05 -173, Preliminary Plat for Tracts 4G, 4D1, and 4EL O.W. Knight Survey, Abstract No.
899. The property is approximately 193 acres located approximately 340 feet west of the
southwest corner of South Carroll Avenue and East Southlake Boulevard. Current Zoning: AG
Agricultural District. Proposed Zoning: S -P -2 Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN
Neighborhood 49e. This is the plat associated with the previous agenda item. The plat
encompasses approximately 19.3 acres and shows the extension of a section of Zena Rucker
Road through the middle portion of the tract. Approximately 9 acres south of Zena Rucker
Road is not currently proposed for development and will require approval of an appropriate
change of zoning prior to any future plan or plat being submitted for approval. The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5 -0) subject to the plat review summary on
January 17, 2006.
Note that a denial of the zoning will eliminate the need to act on the plat
Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item.
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 9 of 41
7E. Ordinance No. 585 -C, 2nd Readim, Tree Preservation Ordinance and Technical Manual.
PUBLIC HEARING. Staff is proposing amendments to the city's Tree Preservation
Ordinance to implement the Environmental Resource Protection recommendations of the
Southlake 2025 Plan, the city's comprehensive master plan. The main changes include: the
establishment of a tree preservation policy, requirements for tree conservation analyses and
plans in conjunction with development applications, incorporation of a tree technical manual in
conjunction with the ordinance, an increase in penalties for violation, and clarification of
approval and administrative authority. The final draft ordinance incorporates comments
received from the city attorney's office. The changes made since the first reading are generally
limited to clarifications and vested rights.
Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item.
7F. Resolution No. 06 -014, (ZA06 -006), Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages at
Brio Tuscan Grille located 1431 Plaza Place. Current Zonins4: DT Downtown District. SPIN
Neighborhood 48. PUBLIC HEARING. This restaurant is located south of Plaza Park in the
Grand Avenue District of Southlake Town Square. The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval (6 -0) on February 23, subject to the term of the applicant's lease on the
property.
Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item.
7G. Ordinance No. 512 -A, 2 " Reading, Amendin, Ordinance No. 512, which levied assessments
for part of the cost of sanitary sewer improvements in Continental Park Estates in the City of
Southlake. PUBLIC HEARING. In 1990, City Council approved Ordinance No. 512 which
levied a sewer assessment for sanitary sewer improvements in Continental Park Estates.
Purchase liens were imposed on all lots within the subdivision until full payment of the
assessment. The ordinance imposed an interest rate of 10% per annum. There were a total of
69 lots assessed. There are 8 lots remaining with unpaid balances. In an effort to close the
outstanding assessments and provide an incentive for the residents to pay the assessments, we
are recommending an amendment to Ordinance No. 512. The ordinance includes a six month
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 10 of 41
incentive period with an interest rate of 4.3% for the outstanding balances. The interest
collected per lot would be reduced by $5,728 (difference from $7,924 to $2,196). Staff will
brief you on the results of the recent research on information provided by Mr. Samartin on
Tuesday evening.
Contact Sharen Jackson with questions on this item.
8A. Ordinance No. 480 -481, 1 st Reading_(ZA05 -146), Zoning Change and Site Plan for
Bicentennial Plaza located at 410 West Southlake Boulevard. Current Zoning: C -2 Local Retail
Commercial District. Requested Zoning: S -P -1 Detailed Site Plan District. An alternate site
plan is also to be considered under the current C -2 Local Retail Commercial District zoning
with no proposed zoning change. SPIN Neighborhood #10. This property is located at the
northeast intersection of the Bicentennial Park entrance and West Southlake Boulevard. Under
the proposed S -P -1 zoning, the primary site plan proposes approximately 12,550 square feet of
retail floor space and construction of 20 off -site parking spaces and a driveway within the
adjacent Bicentennial Park property. An additional 24 off -site parking spaces within the park
property are also shown for future construction. This plan is dependent upon approval of a
separate access and parking agreement between the City and the property owner. The proposal
appeared before the Park Board and received a favorable recommendation.
The uses and regulations proposed under the S -P -1 zoning are as follows:
• There shall be a side yard setback of not less than ten feet along the east boundary;
• Concrete tilt wall with a stained finish shall be permitted on a portion of the building in
accordance with the architectural building elevations submitted; and
• Parking — 72 parking spaces required, requesting 10% reduction or 65 spaces.
The alternate site plan proposed under the current C -2 shows approximately 11,340 square feet
of retail floor space with no off -site parking spaces on the park property. However, the plan
does propose vehicular access through the park entry driveway which will require approval of
an access agreement with the City.
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 11 of 41
The following variances are requested:
• Parking —67 spaces required, requesting 10% reduction or 60 spaces;
• Masonry — Concrete tilt wall with a stained finish; and
• Driveway Stacking — Minimum 50 feet required, 22 feet proposed on alternate plan.
The following variances were granted with the currently approved site plan:
• Driveway Stacking — Minimum 50 feet required, 41 feet proposed, and
• Driveway Spacing — Minimum 250 feet required for right -in /right -out drives, 80 feet
and 219 feet proposed.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6 -0) on February 23, subject to
the site plan review summary 93 dated February 17, noting that the S -P -1 zoning and site plan
is preferred, approving the alternate C -2 zoning revised site plan and granting the requested
variances.
Although the City Council can discuss the alternate revised site plan, final action on this plan
cannot betaken until a public hearing is held. This is planned for March 21.
Contact Ken Baker with questions on this item.
OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
1. Log Cabin Committee Update. Included in your packet is a memo from Council Members and
Log Cabin Committee Co- Chairs Laura Hill and Virginia Muzyka updating you on the current
status of the Committee and providing background information on their efforts to date.
2. Citizen of the Year Award. Last Friday, February 24, the S.P.LN. Standing Committee was
awarded the "Citizen of the Year" Award at the annual Chamber of Commerce banquet. I
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 12 of 41
think that such recognition by the business community points out how important the S.P.LN.
program is to our city, and that the volunteer efforts by each of the representatives have not
gone unnoticed. I will be recognizing S.P.LN. during the City Manager's Report at the second
meeting in March.
3. Thursday, March 16 — Chamber of Commerce's Southlake Leadership class hosted by City
Council, 3:00 — 7:00 p.m., Town Hall. Giovanna Phillips asked if City Council could host the
next Southlake Leadership class in Town Hall on March 16. The content of the program is
entirely up to Council's discretion but one suggestion is for Councilmembers to tour the 16-
member class through Town Hall followed by round -table discussions. Giovanna indicated that
Council is welcomed to the entire four hour timeframe, but if not, she could fill the remaining
time with other coursework.
Please let Lori Farwell know if you are available to participate in this class.
4. Transportation Update. There are a number of items to report to you, as noted below:
• Tarrant County Bond Program — As you know, Tarrant County has proposed a program to
meet critical infrastructure needs across the county through the shared financing of
strategically significant transportation projects. County staff presented information on the
program at the Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition meeting held this morning. A
copy of the presentation is attached. In addition to providing an overview of the bond
program, they also provided a list of local thoroughfare projects and on- system projects that
have been approved for funding by the Commissioner's Court, should the bond program
pass. A copy of the list is also included in your packet.
Note that the White Chapel project was approved for funding. The County will provide
$2,185,000 of the estimated $4,370,000 needed to widen this arterial from 2 lanes to 4 lanes
from Highland to Emerald. The Pearson project and FM 1938 were not approved for
funding, although it is very possible these projects will be funded through the NCTCOG's
Partnership 3 program. Additionally, the Court reserved approximately $40 million of the
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 13 of 41
total package for discretionary use, so it is possible that one of our projects could be
selected as a discretionary project.
The Commissioner's Court is now turning its attention to the bond election. Commissioner
Glen Whitley has offered to coordinate presentations to Councils, community groups, and
others who are interested in learning more about the bond program. We plan to contact him
about making an appearance during one of your meetings, as well as presenting information
through SPIN on March 28. We will also contact other groups that we work with about the
possibility of hosting a program to get the information out.
• Regional Transit Initiative — Discussions continue on this important topic. You may recall
that HB 2702, passed during the regular 79 legislative session, established a committee
that brings together state and local elected officials to address the regional transit initiative
during the interim. The next meeting of this group is scheduled for 10 a.m. on March 17 at
the Irving Arts Center. I plan to attend this meeting, and will be happy to take anyone with
me that would like to attend.
A subcommittee of the Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition has recommended to the
full membership two position statements requesting the Legislature to 1) exempt from the
local sales tax cap one half cent of the sales tax levied for transit in non - attainment areas of
the state, and 2) authorize an advisory referendum in North Texas asking voters if they
support levying a one half cent sales tax to build and operate the regional rail plan adopted
by the MPO.
This initiative has not been without some controversy, as the details continue to be
discussed. However, the policy committee studying this issue repeatedly points out that the
basic question of how to fund a transit initiative has to be discussed first. The transit plan
and other details will be discussed and debated subsequently.
• NCTCOG Funding — We have not yet been formally notified on the status of any of our
applications for funding, but did notice that the Northeast Transit Study project we
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 14 of 41
submitted was included on the staff recommendations list. We will keep you posted on our
success with the projects we have submitted.
• FM 1709 Medians — I recently spoke to TxDOT District Engineer Maribel Chavez about
the possibility of medians on FM 1709 and whether or not the state might be willing to
assist us with the construction funding. Below is an excerpt of an e -mail I received from
her earlier this week:
I appreciate your efforts to incorporate raised medians into FM1709. We
believe that this addition will provide for a safer and better managed environment for
the traveling public and the adjacent properties. We are committed to working with the
City of Southlake to provide a properly engineered design that will provide business
access and a safer facility.
I don't believe we have enough time to provide for thorough public involvement
and include striped medians into the scheduled pavement resurfacing project. However
I will do everything I can to secure funding from other sources for a raised median
project and at adding landscaping to those medians. I will explore this and formally
respond to you. Again, I very much appreciate your recognition that raised landscaped
medians can be beneficial both to good economic growth and for the safety of the
consumers. This is also extremely helpful as we try to extend the life of our
transportation facilities by managing congestion, minimizing conflicts and promoting
safety all the while providing a more aesthetically pleasing roadway.
We will continue to work with TxDOT on this issue.
Contact me with questions on any of these issues.
5. Council Meeting Agenda Management. As we have discussed at various points during the past
year, development - related activity has increased, and we continue to pursue a number of
important city projects. As such, agendas have become larger and meetings longer. Staff is
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 15 of 41
sensitive to this issue and has implemented a number of ideas to move the meetings along.
Nonetheless, we continue to have the challenge as last meeting demonstrated.
To work to improve the situation, we have used Lori's log notes system to document each
agenda item and its length. This is helpful because it shows how meeting time is being used.
Your packet contains the analysis for both the February 7 and February 21 meetings.
The following list shows some of our current initiatives, as well as new ideas for improving the
flow of the meetings:
Agenda Item
Current Initiatives
New Ideas
Executive Session
Manage schedule by including
Hold ES only when needed, not
only those items whose timing
every meeting.
requires the discussion.
Finalize each presentation with
Use PowerPoint presentations to
"options" page so Council can
focus the discussion.
easily settle on direction to take.
Worksession
Presentations on consent items
Include consent presentations in
only when required by Council.
packet.
Review list of consent items by
group, rather than reading each
and asking whether presentation
is needed.
Begin worksessions earlier.
Regular Session
Streamlined staff presentations.
Presentations in packet; further
streamline presentations.
Minimize reports to only those
needed; schedule accordingly.
Limit time allocated to public
comments (e.g., 5 minutes).
Use point system to limit
number of development cases
Don't begin any new item after
placed on any agenda.
certain time (e.g., 11:30 p.m.)
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest
City Council meeting March 7, 2006
Page 16 of 41
These are just a few ideas, I'm sure there are others to consider. I hope that we can work
together to develop a more efficient meeting process to minimize the inconvenience and
discomfort for all involved. Please let me know if you have ideas we should place on the list.
Attachments
• Log Cabin Update letter from councilmembers Hill and Muzyka
• Tarrant County Bond Program presentation
• List of local thoroughfare projects and on- system projects —approved by Commissioners Court
• Time analysis of the February 7 and 21 city council meetings
SKY
Staff Direct Phone Numbers:
Baker, Ken, Director of Planning, 748 -8067
Blagg, Jim, Assistant City Manager, 748 -8601
Farwell, Lori, City Secretary, 748 -8016
Gregg, Gary, IT Manager, 748 -8086
Hugman, Kevin, Director of Human Resources, 748 -8193
Jackson, Sharen, Finance Director, 748 -8042
Last, Greg, Director of Economic Development, 748 -8037
Polasek, Steve, Director Community Services, 748 -8018
Price, Robert, Public Works Director, 748 -8097
Smith, Rick, Director of DPS, 748 -8108
Thatcher, Ben, Assistant to the City Manager, 748 -8005
Yelverton, Shana, City Manager, 748 -8001
City of Southlake, Texas
MEMORANDUM
February 28, 2006
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Council Members Laura Hill and Virginia Muzyka
SUBJECT: Log Cabin Committee Update
Please join us in expressing our sincere gratitude to the Citizens who volunteered countless hours
to serve you on the Log Cabin Committee.
* The 13 residents appointed by our Council met for the first time in December and every two
weeks in January and February, not to mention upcoming budget/planning meetings in March.
* Members spent over 14 hours in meetings plus additional hours touring potential sites.
* This diverse group gave 100% to this directive from Council. All discussions and votes
were open, candid and professional. The weighted criteria "forced ranking" system worked
effectively and impartially.
I know each of you will join us in thanking this fine group of citizens for accomplishing the goal
Council set forward.
As Co- Chairs of the Log Cabin Committee we are pleased to present you with an update on the
current status of the Committee work performed to date, as well as background information on
the process.
Following a thorough and impartial review process the Log Cabin Committee at their February
20, 2006 meeting selected Summit Park as the recommended location for placement of the log
cabin. A sub - committee is currently undertaking the design and budgeting aspect of the process
and an artist has been commissioned to provide a color rendering of the cabin as it might appear
on the site. We anticipate presenting a full report to the City Council at your upcoming April 4,
2006 meeting.
From a historical perspective, at the December 6, 2005, City Council meeting the Log Cabin
Committee was established by Ordinance No. 05 -074 with the following general scope of work:
- recommend a location for the placement of the historic log cabin as well as potential
inclusion of other suitable historic features
- develop a master plan for the placement and programming of the log cabin and other
potential historical features
- develop a conceptual plan for the layout of the log cabin and site amenities
- provide detailed cost estimates for log cabin restoration and site amenities
- provide a color rendering of the restored log cabin
- investigate potential joint opportunities for planning, construction, and operations
- present a final report to City Council with recommendations to include the information
listed above within 60 to 90 days
The Committee met for the first time on December 15, 2005 to review the scope of work as
requested by City Council, develop a base list of potential sites for placement of the log cabin,
and establish some general site criteria by which the locations could be scored. The Committee
members were encouraged to explore the sites listed and investigate and suggest other potential
locations for inclusion prior to the January 12, 2006 meeting.
As a result, a total of eighteen sites were initially identified by the Committee and reviewed in
terms of their positive aspects and challenges. The potential locations and site criteria were also
scored individually by each Committee member from one (1) to three (3) with the low number
being the most favorable. From this initial scoring the potential site locations were pared down
and the site criteria weighted.
From the initial scoring, the top four sites selected included Bicentennial Park (Bunker Hill),
Bicentennial Park (west side), Summit Park, and Noble Oaks Park. Given that the timeframe for
development of the west side of Bicentennial Park is several years out the Committee choose to
eliminate this site from further consideration. The weighted criteria was then utilized to score
the remaining three sites. The top two sites (Bicentennial Park — Bunker Hill and Summit Park)
were carried forward in the process while Noble Oaks Park was eliminated.
In preparation for ranking the final two locations, the Committee toured the Bicentennial Park
and Summit Park sites at their February 6, 2006 meeting. The site visits provided the Committee
members an opportunity to better explore the feasibility of each location and discuss various
aspects in more detail.
Using twenty site selection criteria developed and weighted by the Committee (see attached),
Bicentennial Park and Summit Park were individually scored by each of the thirteen Committee
members at their February 20, 2006 meeting. Summit Park scored a 20.9 (414 total points) and
Bicentennial Park scored a 21.6 (429 total points) with the lower score being the more favorable
location. A copy of the Site Selection Worksheet is attached for your information.
We are very pleased with the open and uniform process utilized by the Committee and greatly
appreciate the time, effort, and input put forth by all of the members. You are welcome to
contact either of us at your convenience should you have any questions or desire additional
information regarding the work performed by the Log Cabin Committee.
Cc: Log Cabin Committee Members
Shana Yelverton, City Manager
Jim Blagg, Assistant City Manager
Sites Considered
f
c
i
e
n
t
e
n
5
n
u
i
to
6
m
I
t
t
t
a
Site Selection Worksheet
k
a
r,
k
l
u
T
tt
o
k
W
�
rk
r
S
2
i
i
u
a
�
e
Criteria used
D9tri tiort
Wei htin
Tpn�l
Security
3.4%
24
1.7
37
Visiblli
410%
19
17
35
Ease aF access welkin /car faun
3.5°fo
14
19
33
Par$dng
5.1%
22
24
46
Ta ra t
S5%
W
°8
38
Drainage
5,795
17
i3
3 0
Cost of site development
s.3%
lb
i7
33
ProxImity to destination location
513%5
27
15
42
Hand] ca 2 Acces sibiljtZ
4,4%
27
1
25
47
Potential for Future rowth expansion
r• 4%
20
26
46
Fit for setting
3.S%
25
22
47
5aP for running/playing children
3.4%
24
22
42
Settl consist with cabin era
5.9%
22
21
43
Sites hi5toria Signi ficance
6.4%
2 1
19
40
Additional area for su farthing plot
5.3%
21
30
51
Promote tourlsm
5.9%
31
24
51
Fits #�# d5 art of educa se tting /arel#
5.5%
21
23
44
A Bat to visitors
3.6%
24
19
43
Sher Istkc pvsltive Empact an attendance to
4.9%
24
24
48
adjacent facilities J entities
Positive impact on adjacent land awners/residentsl
511%
23
23
46
or busirsesSes
RNMEMMEM
Criteria Scoring
Fxerc se
Summary
C!rilteri
Sewn#
Visibility
Fast qr "Gags w &Ikin carjbvs
Parking1
M
u
x
Y
k
a
L
1
x
N
I
r
1
i
1
2
t
n
h
C
n
s
D
n
Y
t
lr
Committee Member
r R r
E o a
P p t n
e I e h d t' .
e e m K e v If
b ? e r r � e
I i t n a
B o c L! 4
3 r r
1' 2 . , 1 1 2 21 11 1
2 2 E fl — 1 I 1 I 1
2 1 1 2 1 2 1
1 2 2 2 1 2 2
C
o
o
I
2
y
1
1
1
2
"
i
i
I
$
7
9
1
3
G
a
I
I
Fr
f
2
2
2
TQ. l Aver&ae
16 1 -2
19 ;,s
17 1.3
24 1.$
70 ran
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2b
2.0
Oraln 2 2
!
1
2
2
f
3
3
2
2
2
3
27
2,1
A
Costafsite p'vF,'i it -t'rtt
E
Z
2
2
1
f
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
25
L.9
Pr#xlmi t4 dest lora9*_I�±n
2
3
1
3
L
2
2
3
L
1
1
3
2
25
11$
Ha Accessil�; lit_+
k
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
21
1,6
s , _. = .-
F t Fpr[
2
2
1
1
1
2
L
2
2
1
1
1
1
!B
1.4
Safer for runni t W in ch.iidren
1
1
d
1
2
1
1
1
i
1
f
1
2
16
1 - 2
5etti consistent wlth cabin Era
2
3
2
1
2
1
3
2
3
3
1
2
3 j
26
2 - 2
SIWS hlstprkal si nrflcanc2
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
3
9
31
1
21
31
30
2.3
'{
.. :.:3
-
Prompte tourism
2
2
2
Ll
2
3
3
l
1
2
3
3
24
2.2
Fits In as part of edUCOt ortai setts area
3
3
Z
2
3
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
21
28
2.0
Appea t4 +kisjtogs
i
2
1
2
E
1
1
1
=
t
1
1
3
17
1.3
S oa. i5tic ibve Im act on atLendance to
1
1
2
3
2
2
!
2
2
2
d
2
2
23
1,$
ad aaenk racilities entliles
Posine Irn act On &d ¢ landownerslre5lden
?
3
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
3
1
1
2
24
1.8
or businesses
Totals
472
jftgZ4gt '
'1" is most Important
- 2° is rmkrataly irripprwnt
.3w is ieBSt important
2006 TRANSPORTATION
BOND PROGRAM
larch 1 2006
2006 Transportation Bond Program
--=IL
The Cha
Tarrant County continues to grow rapidly, placing a burden
on the available transportation infrastructure
* Over 1.6 million people currently reside in Tarrant County
Tarrant County is the fastest growing county
in the MPO region
e Local governments struggle to meet transportation
capacity demands
e Roadway construction costs continue to rise
e Air quality concerns require congestion mitigation
2006 Transportation Bond Program
Purl2ose
To meet critical infrastructure reeds across Tarrant County
through the shared financing of strategically significant
transportation projects.
Program Coals
Assist municipalities in funding local projects for which full
funding is unavailable
Leverage state and federal funding sources to advance local and
on-system projects
Participate in funding road and bridge projects related to the
implementation of a strategic rail initiative
® Improve air quality through the cooperative funding of
intersection improvements
2006 Transportation Bond Program
Program Schedule
June 2005: Commissioners Court approves trans. bond program policy
June 2005: Staff notifies cities of upcoming bond program and seeks
candidate projects
July 2005: Staff meets with representatives from the Cities, FWTA and
NCTCO — letters are written from staff and Judge
Aug. 2005: Tarrant County receives 129 project submittals
Sept. 2005: Tarrant County hires Freese and Nichols to assist with bond
program management
Sept. to Jars. 2006: Project Evaluation Committee completes project ranking and
final project recommended list
Jan. 31, 2006: Commissioners Court approves recommended list and allocates
funding for ors- system projects
2006 Transportati . ! >:
Summa!y of Candidate Projects
® Submitted costs for candidate projects total over $540 million
® 113 Local Thoroughfare projects submitted
0 16 on- System projects submitted
54 - Road v idenings
20- New Roads
41 - Intersection Improvements
S - New Trails
2 - Road Realignments
1 - Road Reconstruction
1 - Study
1 - Transportation Information System
1 - Hazmat Sensor Installation
2006 Transportati Bond Program
---------- --- - I.....
20 municipalities chose to submit projects for consideration
in this program:
Arlington
0
burst
• Azle
®
Keller
enbrook
Kennedale
olleyville
0
Mansfield
Euless
a
North Richland Hills
o Everman
a
Richland Hills
Fort forth
Saginaw
a Grand Prairie
southlake
Grapevine
Watauga
0 Haltom City
Westlake
7 � 2006 Transportation Bond Program
• The Project Evaluation Committee (PEC) was composed of 15
informed citizens and transportation professionals
• The County Commissioners and Judge appointed 3 committee
members each
® There was excellent attendance and participation by the
committee members
m Meetings were held on:
September 15, 2005
September 29, 2005
October 20, 2005
November 17, 2005
December 1, 2005
January 5, 2006
2006 Transportation Bond Program
The PE C determined the Project Selection Criteria that would meet
program policy goals and a weighting factor was applied to the
composite score of each criteria
u Congestion Mitigation
a Strategically Significant
a Air Quality Improvement
a County Funding Participation
Cost Efficiency
Project Ranking Criteria
Safety Enhancement
Time to Implement
stat. Aar Comy Cc9i Elt. Safety Tme io
M t Sig. cKohly Part. kmp.
7 ;4� r . : 2006 Transportation Bond Program
Conceptual Funding Breakdown*
Total Dollars Available: 200 million (max.)
Discretionary Dollars: 20% 40 million
Road/Bridge Project Dollars
Relating to Transit initiative: 10 20 million
On- System Project Dollars: 0% 40 million
Local Projects: 50 $100 million
Total: 100%
* Funding levels shown are preliminary and subject
to change by the Tarrant County Commissioners Court
_ 2Q06 Transportation Bind Program
Summary of Recommended P
Local Arterial Widening s 30 $224 million
Intersection Improvements: million
New Roadways: : million
Can- System Projects: is 0 million
Transit Project: 1 $330 million
(bond program funds related
road and bridge projects only
Total Estimated
Cost of Projects: $797 million
Total County Funding Required: $160 million
loo million (lo-cal) +$40 million (state) +$2_o million (transit)
2006 Transportation Bond Program
;��L 2006 Transportation Bond Program
Contact I
R andy Skinner
Transportation Planner
Tarrant County
Phoney 817 -884 -1653
Email: rvskinner@tarrantcounty.com
Renee Lamb
Director of Transportation Services
Tarrant County
Phone: 817 - 854 -1173
Email: rlamb@tarrantcounty.com
TARRANT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION BOND PROGRAM
COURT APPROVED LOCAL THOROUGHFARE PROJECTS
Projer;l
Numtcr
City
Project
Type
Location
From
To
Proj ®MD— riptlan
Suhtrltted
Cant
Requested
Funding
1
North Richland HiIRS
I : nen_ng
Nort Tar it Pa*x
Prednct Li •w
Davis
Clly limits
Tlnity blvd
Whi[I
Widen arterial
Widen arteial Tram 2 lanes to 4 tones
Widen arterial
S 12,462,000
1 10,039.000
$ 21,590,000
$
$ _2,729,073
$ 10,795,079
2
Fort Worth
North Richland ! ?fills: :feller
_ .............
North Richland :•fills
._—
'Ric.nmg
SH10
8
. ...
Wieenih
Widening
North Tarranl Parkway Davis to Wliillay
5555... .
Davis -3555_ .....
East Rosedale.
........._
Davis
4
Err.erald Ili :ls
Slalnes
Widen art irom erial iro 51-1. 71anes
5 1,450,000
S 150,0,:1]
5
Fort Warih
Fort Warih
Widening
: :._.__-
Jill
IH3 -'.:
.... ..
Hrll,.ni
111620
Widen artedet irom 2 lanes 104 lanes Ptus ROW
S 26,51il
$ 7,994,000
B
W caning
Lllereed r
Wide inq
Golden Tri - gi.
113377
Widen arterial irom 2lanes re 4lanes
$ 14,608000
$ 7,300,000
7
._._�
Colleyville
Ja Rd at Cheek Sp.�
_
-csl Broad Street
Inlersection improvements
S 741il
5 374,940
B
Mansfield
Day War
Widen arterial irom 2lanes m 4lenes(dv, r&g)
$ 3,475.157
$ 1,737,579
9
Grand Prairie
Yom Lane
_
Great $ou7hwe_vt Plm:g - ..... ....__
Davis at Mld C '. :cz
' H 1 hlilwer
Atld turn lanes at IH -20 Intersec0ons (EB 8 W BI
& 1,700,375
S 221,049
10
Ryrth Richland Miss
Inleroeotion
M;d -Cities
........ ,.
11-12D
IH35
Irdersvxhon lmpravements
W Iden arterial from S lanes fo 7lanas
S 1,500,000
S 93,152,000
5 259,000
$ w,n,noa
71
Noun Rlchlantl HiIL4 5 5 -3. __�
5-3-355
Widening
Rufe Snow
— -3-355
12
Arnnglon
Wlderang _
-
......_—
m Springs Bowan Sprin
Ailin9lon city limits
W [den anerlal from 2lanes lo 4lanes
d 1,859,400
S 892.573
$ 3,32uaD
$ 1d:6,na;
12
Fort Worth
Arlington
Grand Praine
—
rg
East Hc s ?da'c
Greer.Cek
U5287
Ballpark Way
W lden arterial Imm 4 lanes to 5 lanes
Widen arterial horn 4 lanes to 5 lanes
S iB.515,000
$ 2,198,200
14
Widen rig
_
Lincnlr.
- .,.,..-
Great Southwest Pkwy
19
W idenin .. _._..._.—
-3555.
Lake 1l rl !m P-r
555-3
l7ehUle t
Stadium 5555.
Green Daks
North tddga • Joe Pool'
Widen arterial Irom 4 lanes to B lanes
$ 4,528.63.0
S 2.314.373
5555
3
5 1.74500x;
- „
5 s,e °g60•a
S 2.'d0 : 000
1B
Mansfield
Widening
Mall
Eastern city limns
Widen eA.Nal from 2 lanes to d lanes jdW, Cox)
5555
S 2 375 7C0
17
Arlin n
Arin
Widening
Chapman Cutoff
Division
Widen areial ho 4lano5 to 5lanes
S 3625 Sip
_-
& 3,816.00p
5 -7 - ,x0(0
18
W idenin 9
Ban di Way
y
sH3s0
._.........
widen artorlar ho:1 �� lanes to 5lanes
19 .-
20
..... Fort Worth
A - !mgion
Widening
East First Sheet
8aach
Oakland
Kelly Eilipll
a riai
_-
'r,' :derrderio snit tares to 4lanes
Vd'.den an_cal it ^rnGla'ies'[r 5 lanes
7 Vr'idc :l arL,ial frcn 41a-1es la B fanii
Wkiening
pleasanl Ridge
eowen
$ 9,c L
$ 4.:35,000
27
22.
A-in 1.
9
Widening
Matlock
t
Mayfield
Rardin
E 2 ?5 2C�
$_- 77t7,67?
c 3900
8 'Ai!3,000
Grapcvira
-
Widening
8830 Pro Daye
SHO
SH12t - __-
23
Arlin :.;o�
N. 4aad
I:'ts —.ai on
Collins
souLleasi Pkvry
__.�..
Marls_illlld WebO
Curstruut new arterie7 shall of future6Lanes
--- 5.2 -3..0 ....................
$ IOS2E,G07
..�
�$ 8,C91,50D
24
Nodh R,6 ••.'il :;
Grapevine Hwy el Harwood
Inlerse tlun Improvements
$ 2,887,000
$ 233,500
25
Cal =ynlh
Ir[srsaClion
John IkCam at Pleasant Run
inlerssction Improvemenls
$ 402,718
$ 201,359
26
27
Er., —,
Euless
'1uw Road
Dvercld U Pacilip ROW
FM 11
1F135RH2O intgrrhenge
Carrseuuf new arterial
$ 330,000
S 1,870,000
$ 155,000
S 635,000
Extension
Gateway Boultrverd
Cenhdon t3oulevard
Glade Road
Extend 4 lam.Eton anginal
23
214
Widening
White Crape[ -
H'jhland
Emerald
Widen artarlal from 2 lanes to 4lanes
$ 4,370,000
$ 2,185,000
29
Saginaw
Wide. ng
Longhorn
Did Decatur
8uslmse 287
Witlen arenal Imm 3lenes 10 6 lanes (dil
$ 10,700,000
S 5,350,000
30
Colleyvllle
intersection
Martin at Cheek Sparger
Sublon
Intersection Improvements
$ 511,083
$ 255,542
31
Kenmdati
Widening
Little l lRoad
Arlington city knits
Widen arterial irom 2 lanes to 4 lanes
$ 1,r,23, 1 GO
$ 1.761,575
32
Axl
NEW Road
Denier hail
Current Denver Trail
Ash
ConstrucE new 2lane aflerl
§ 4,550,2-07
$ 2,425,000
33
Kennedale
Widening
Little School Road
Suslness 267
north 5,750 feat
Widen adeiial hom 2 lanes to 4 lanes
S 4,526.930
$ 2,203,450
34
35
Grand Prairie
New Road
Lynn G
5H360
take Ridge Pkwy
construct new 4lane undivided arterial
_
$ 7,220,500
$ 3,510,250
Mansliew
New Road
Harltkge i ",kway
Union Pacific Railroad
Cotton
Mallook
Reya
New consinnfjon of 4lam arterial
Wid_s_n arterial irom 2lanes t0 41a11ea (Done)
S 5p 50
_.. 2_ 2213. 5,353 ........ -.
S ,6
S 2.017,725
$ 1,14Z977
35
Mans5ekl
Wldrning
Was, broad lineal
37
Mansfield
Widening
Callender
U3267
Tumer Wamelf
Wl remF irom 2 lades to 4 larres(e6g)
$ 2,058,122
$ 1,029,551
38
WelangN
Widening
Slam[.:
__
Bogart S",e[
_.
_ _
Indian tl
SP rigs
BH377
Widen aderial1mm 21anea 10 41anea
S 2,140,476
S 1,070,739
39
c0eyvile
Widening
Pleasant Run
Precinct Line
SH28 _
East city kmlta 'Widen
:".'fiat arc-rial tram 2lanes to 4 lanes
-
an¢dal irom 4 lanes to 49aras; W median
Add turn lanes at Mayfield Intersectlon
$ 6a5,943
$ 332,972
40
Hurst
Widsirl
..._.._ 555-3. ... _.
Pipeline
S 11,412,731
S 566,746
S 1,141,273
5 283,373
41
Grand Plaids
Turn Lanes
_
Greer•. Eo1r`i r;r�s: tN.va
42
Arlinglon
Inlersecllar.
_
Mai lcc's-r uay7i?I
_.
'.3Gwran l 3u inua ._..__.. .__.
1-do rom
Intarsectlon lmprpvernen10
$ 471,890
$ 227,500
43
Kennedale
WldenMeanr
5555.
Dlek'riee _
..__
SH290
Pennsylvanla
Witlen arterial In 2lanes to 4lanes (realign)
$ 4,365,400
$ 2,1B2,7a0
44
Arlington
Widening
Arlington cily limits 1WIden
arterial hom 4loneo to 6Inn"
S 7,387,500
$ 3,549,750
S 282,970,045
$ 97,202,172
Page 1 of 2 Current as of February 2006
TARRANT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION BOND PROGRAM
COURT APPROVED ON SYSTEM PROJEC
Project
Number
city
Project
Type
Location
From
To
Project Desorlption
Submitted
cast
Requested
Funding
I
Fort Worth
Widening
FM 1187
IH35W
Oak Grove Rd.
Widen arterial from 2lanes to 4 lanes
$ 6,760,000
$2,250,000
2
.Fort Worth
lmprvrunt
IH35W North
IH820
US287
Widen to Blanes and improve ramps
$ 91,700,000
$10,000,000
a
.Euless
Intersection
SH10 - Various Locations
Intersection improvements w1 atomic clack system
$ 125,000
$82,500
4
GmpeAne
Widening
SH26
Fool
SH114
Widen arterial from 4 lanes to 6 laces
$ 27.470,132
$10,400,000
a
Fort Worth
Intersection
SH183 - Various Locations
Intersection Improvements at nine locations
$ 1,170,000
$565,000
6
Grand Prairie
Tum Lanes
MayFleld al SH360
Add turn lanes at intersection
$ 975,000
397,500
7
Grand Prafrla
Signal
SH3601 Web Lynn at New York Ave.
Add Signal at Webb Lynn Int, t4 NY Ave1Ad W b Brit
$ 160,000
$60,000
6
Mansfield
New Road
US237 Frontage
Walnut Creek
East Broad
Construct rrontape roads and bridges
$ 3,441,600
$4,720,800
9
Arington
Irdersaction
Nodh Callins at Careen Oaks
North Collins at Green Oaks
$ 244,520
$11 8,000
10
Arlington
Intersection
North Collins at Road to Six Flags
North Collins at Road to Six Flags
$ 2442,200
$117,500
11
.Arlington
Intersecdon
South Cooper at Green Oaks
South Cooper at Green Oaks
$ 517,360
$248,000
12
Arlington
Intersection
Cooper at Mayfield
Cooper at Mayfield
$ 149.460
$72,750
13
Benbrpok
Widening
US377
lH2D
Wlnsma
Widen arterial to 6lenes wIM median
S 13,174,416
$1,902,441
l
FOrl Worth
Aealignmenl
FMi56
E�9t1 ng FM156
Exist) FM156
Realign adedal around Alliance Airport
$ 22,192,277
$5,100,000
r15
Mansfield
€ntemectlon
US287 at Walnut Creek
Texas turnarourrds on US287 at Walrwt Creek
$ 4,387,680
$2,193,840
Mansfield
Intersection
U6287 at E. Broad
Texas turnarounds on US267 at E. Broad
$ 1,6E2,520
$931,26
Rlchland Hflls
rmprvmnt
Baker Blvd.
Booth Callaway
SHED
naconslruct arterial
$ 14,000,DDO
$9,430,000
$ 1Ba,572,165
5 37,279,591
City Council meeting
e ruary 7,
Time
Agenda Ikea
Description
Duratton
Totals
in minutes
5:35 PM
Mayor Called meeting to order and reviewed consent
nda items
5
6:00 PM
closed work session and called for an executive
session
67
Total minutes fot.wwkse and efcecu Session
7:07 PM
reconvened regular meeting, invocation, reports,
proplarnations
23
7:30 PM
Mayor read consent agenda items into the record
5
7.35 PM
motion for consent agenda
t
7:35 PM
public forum - no one spoke
0
:.
.:.
Total minutes for invocation, repo ft' consent agenda;..::.
and uhiic forum... ,.. ;.... .:.....: ..............: <. ..,
29
7 :35 PM
7A, Stonsbridge
Park, ZCP
Staff preseRta5on
2
7.38 PM
Applicant presentation and questions
8
7.45 PM
public hearing opened
0
7:A5 PM
resident spoke in favor
3
T49 PM
pubric hearing closed
(I
7'49 PM
matron for Item 7A
1
:. .:......:.....:....:..::.
.:.
total minutes for Item 7A .:::
; ...14
7:50 PM
7B, Vermilion Cou
Garden Offices, SP
Staff presentab
a
7 :58 PM
Applicant presentation and questions
3
8 :09 PM
public hearing opened and closed - no onesp
1
9:02 PIW
motion for Item 7B
0
..:.., ...
:. .
-. ....
total mina# for Iffier 7i3 ........:'. :.. . ;:..; :..! .; ..
'....
12
8:02 PIM
70, warship facility
for St. John's
Church
Staff presentation
2
City Council meeting
February 7, 2006
8:04 PM
public hearing opened and closed
0
B:D4 PM
motion for (tern 7C;
1
total minutes for Iterri 7C
3
8:05 PM
Mayor called for a break
19
8:24 PM
Mayor reconvened meeting
0
79
8:24 PM
7❑ & 7E, Grand
Avenue
Staff ELe for both 71] & 7E
3
827 PMI
ARpljQanl presentation and questions
34
x:01 PME
pub6c hearing opened and closed
0
9:01 PM
motion for Item 7D
3
8:04 PM
motion for Item 7E
'1
WWI minutes.€nr Eierrs 713 & 71 =:..:
41
9 :G5 PM
7F & 7G, Town
Square Sign
Variances
Staff resentation for bath 7F & 7G
3
9:08 PM
Council discussion
1
9:09 PM
motion for Item 7F
3
9:12 PM
motion for Item 7G
0
:...: ...... ......:: :.
to& minutes far item 7F & .,..................
9:12 PM
7H, Grand Avenue
landscaping
Staff presentation
2
9:14 PM
Applicant presentation and questions
4
9.1 B PM!
mof& for Item 7H
1
...... ..:.. .:..... . :.........
total Minutes for Item 7i-) ..... ....:.................:.
7
9:99 PM
71, Brownstone
Developer's Agmt
amendment
Staff presentation
4
9:23 PM
Applicant presentation, questions from Council, CQUncil
deliberation
34
City Council meeting
Feb
9 :57 PM
motion for Item 71
6
total rrti€iutes #or Item 71::
44
10:03 PMI
Mayor called for a break
10
10 :13 PM
Mayor or reconvened the meeting
2
total r�ninutes.for break'
12
10.15 PMj
10A, Shops of
5outhlake
conditional sign
permit
Staff presentaUon
6
10:21 PM
Applicant resentation and questions from Courictl
41
11:02 PM
motion for Item 10A
4
:......:...:..:.:
total minutes for Item 10A ..:. .:: :..;...:..:- .:...: :........,
-51
11.48 PM
1OB, & IOD
Slops of of S ao #hlake
la
Staff tntrodtrtion to Shops of Southlake items and
detail for Item 10C
11
11:17 PM
Staff prese ntation for Item 108
10
11:27 PM
Staff presentation for Itern 1 OP
6
11:33 PM
motion for Item 1 OB
1
11:34 PM
Matlon for Iteim 1 OC
1
11:35 PM
motion for Item 1 OD
1
:...:....
tolal.rrtiriutes for Iterns 108, 14G;:& 14C ....
.;..:.:..
30
11:36 PM
1 108, Sign variance
for Aventerra
Staff presentation
4
11:40 ISM
Applicant presentation, questions from Council, and
Council deliberation
14
11:54 PM
motion for Item 1DE
1
total minutes for item 10E
:13
11:65 PM
IOF, Sign variance
for Shoo FavifIon
Staff presentation
6
Gity Cauraa meeting
February 7, 2QB
22
12:01 AM
A cant presentation, ouestians Iron) Courld. and
Council deiiberatiun
12: 23 AIM
motion bf It -3m ICF
2
i
�—
total minutes f Item 1 OF:
30
12:25 AM
10G, Sign variance
for Capital One
i
f
Staff Presantatb.rl
C
12:25 ANN
ppllcarnt pretientation, questions from Council ana
Council deliberation
11
12:35 AM
motion for Item 10G
1
-
total r jnute5''f& It6in 10C
12
12; AM
Mayor adj o urned me-b 1n
,
Total minutes for Februa 7. 100E meedrio
4021
CRy Council meetin
Fi tbruary 21, 2008
Total minutes for inuocdon, yepwts, consent agenda: and.puh]lc
7A, Shops of
SOLAhlake SP
St pwantatlon fo r first regular acier:da i=am
8:13 FP+i
7
20`
_—
Applicant prazentation ann queMms
8:20 PM
8:40 PM
Rucliz hearinq apemen
1
8:41 PM
let speaker
3
8:44 PM
2nd speaker
2
8:46 PM
3rd speaker
3
public hearing closed
Council dellberatlon
8:49 PM
4
8:49 PM
37
- -- - -- -- -- -- - - - --
I
- - - - --
-
motlon for Item 7A
9:28 PM
Total minutes For ftern 7A .. .::
74
9:29 P V.
7E3- Shaps of
Southlake noise
variance
motion to deny Item 7B
0
0
9.29 FOP ",
70, Zoning
Change to SFAA
Staff presenUion
City Council meeting
E rue
8:35 PM
putAic hearing opened
- -?
—
9:35 pm
one spe aker, public headng closed
motion for Rem 70
__ --
6
9 :37 PM
Total inhales for.lterrr 7D .>
9.37 PM
7E, Ordinance
ainendment
regarding
sanitary sewer
im nave
Staff presentation
__ L
9 PM
public hearkig opened
9:41 PM
1st speaker
7
9:48 PM
2nd speaker
4
9:52 PM
3rd s eaker
5
9:58 Pfd
motlon totahle Itcrn 7E
7
I' Total:; inutes for Wm YE
3 -159 P
Mayor called 'Dr L� b; uak :mC stated he will not be presiding over Rem
8A
Mayor Pro Tern C31Jed m eeting back to orde
1
1
1018 PM
18�
Total mlriutesfor break ...........: -. ..
10;17 PM
8A, Bells Laqu,
1st ReadMg
Staff prgsentaflon
11
.. - -..�
10:28 PM
Applicant resentatian and _ questions
19
10;47 PM
Ma Pr Pro Tarn read Comment Cards and alk wed publIc comment
13
11;00 PM
1 st speaker
0
11:05 PM
2nd 3,eaker
7
91:13 PM
3rd speaker
15
1 1,28 PM
4th speaker
6
11:34 PM
5th speaker
5
11,39 PM
6th speaker
30
12,09 AM
17th
speaker
1
r
12,OR AM
T 8 th s p eaker
1
1214AM
a pI ica 'i t's alo rney s oke - - - --
5
12 AH
!%IaYcr Pro Ter- called an axac.tive session
17
co Cound rnee
February 27 2006
12:32 AM
Ma r P ro Tern reconvened meetin
-M._,
,..._....----
._.....
U
...... ...
' 33 AM
motlon to deny Item 8A
137
Total mini W for Ito ni 34.:.....; : :.
-- - ...........
2;33 A'�1
-.. - - - -
M or Pro Tern called for a break
5
.. ..................
12;38.4`JI
Ma crreconvanedmr - l hg
0
Ta}fal minutds
12:38 AM
$B, Hawthorne
Place ZCP
Staff presentafion
7
12:45 AM
Appilcant p resentabon and questlong dam CnUncp
48
7:33 AM
motion to approve km 88
1
-,,
Total minutes fDr Item 8a .......... ....
56
1:34 ANI
9C, C�rrnll
Crossroads, ZCP
Staff preSenWion
15'
7:49 AM
licant e resentation and questicrE fray. Cour..a
37
2:26 AFB
r OUM to approve Item BG
4
Total rninutes for item ECG
I
i
2:30 AM
10A, Sign
Variance for
Stampede Sports
Staff pmserdatjori
2:34 AM
Applicant presontalion and questions from Councii
2;43 AM
mctia:- for Item 10A
G
Taal mirotes for Item tOA ......... :..... �. .: ' ::..
.. ...
13
243 AM
meeting ad`ourned
Tote) minutes fc�r February 21. 200B meetin
54T