The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 7BCity of Southlake Department of Planning STAFF REPORT February 1, 2006 CASE NO: ZA05 -153 P ROJECT: Site Plan for Vermilion Court Garden Offices REQUEST: Panorama Properties is requesting approval of a site plan for the development of one medical office building and one general office building for a total of 13,540 square feet on approximately 1.65 acres. The site requires an eight (8) foot screening device along the north property line adjacent to single family residential property. A wrought iron fence currently exists along a portion ofthe property line. A stone subdivision entrance monument exists at the northeast corner. The applicant is proposing to extend the wrought iron fence along the entire north property line and connecting into the subdivision monument. Stone columns will be added approximately every 32 feet along the entire length of the existing and new wrought iron fence. The entire length of the fence will be planted with five (5) gallon evergreen wax myrtles spaced five (5) feet on center with an initial plant height of three (3) feet. The applicant is also proposing a stone retaining wall off -set approximately 5 feet inside the property boundary with a height varying from 3 to 7 feet. The residential property to the north is on the high side of the wall. City Council approved a concept plan as part of a change of zoning to "0- 1 " Office District on September 4, 2001. The driveway location onto Vermilion Court, a local street, was approved by City Council as there is no access permitted on W. Southlake Blvd due to spacing requirements from the intersection. In the event there is no other public access, commercial driveways shall be permitted on collector or local streets provided that they meet the design standards outlined in the Driveway Ordinance No. 634. A stacking depth of 30' was also approved at that time for the drive proposed on Vermilion Court. ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct public hearing 2. Consider site plan approval ATTACHMENTS: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) Background Information Vicinity Map Plans and Support Information Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated February 1, 2006 Surrounding Property Owners Map Surrounding Property Owners Responses Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (748 -8067) Dennis Killough (748 -8072) Case No. ZA 05 -153 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: Panorama Properties PROPERTY SITUATION: 2900 W. Southlake Boulevard LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Vermilion Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "O -1" Office District HISTORY: -A change of zoning from "AG to "O -1" with an associated concept plan was approved by City Council on September 4, 2001. -City Council approved a preliminary plat for Vermilion Addition on August 21, 2001. -A final plat was approved by the P &Z Commission January 9, 2003. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Case No. ZA 05 -153 Master Thoroumhf tre Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Boulevard to have 130 feet of right -of -way. Adequate right -of -way exists for this roadway. Existin,- Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed site will have one (1) full access drive directly onto Vermilion Court. The site is also making the connection to the property to the west through common access easements on the properties. W. Southlake Boulevard is a five -lane, undivided thoroughfare with a continuous, two -way, center left -turn lane. The width of the roadway is sufficient to be a seven -lane roadway. May, 2005 traffic counts on W. Southlake Blvd (between Pearson Ln & F.M. 1938 24hr West Bound WB 17,303 East Bound (EB) (16,915 WB Peak A.M. 900 11:15 -12:15 a.m. Peak P.M. 1,881 5:30 -6:30 p.m. EB Peak A.M. 1,626 7 - 8 a.m. Peak P.M. 1,186 5 - 6 p.m. Attachment A Page 1 Traffic Impact PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN: Use Sq. Ft. Vtpd* AM- IN AM- OUT PM- IN PM_ OUT Medical Office 6,770 245 13 3 7 18 General Office 6,770 75 9 1 2 8 Total 13,540 320 22 4 9 26 *Vehicle Trips Per Day * *The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on W. Southlake Boulevard. According to the Master Pathways Plan, an 8 -foot multi -use trail is planned adjacent to the development along W. Southlake Boulevard. The trail has been constructed and is shown on the site plan. WATER & SEWER: An 8 -inch water line currently exists along the north side of W. Southlake Boulevard adjacent to this lot. The applicant is proposing to extend a 6 -inch sanitary sewer line from the west. TREE PRESERVATION: All of the existing trees except for one (1) 12" Hackberry are located within the parking lot, within 6' feet of a building or within an access drive. The applicant is proposing to combine the parking lot landscape islands to preserve two (2) of the existing trees located in the proposed southern parking lot but the proposed grade changes or elevations of the parking lot would leave the trees within the landscape islands one foot (1') below grade. The trees would be built into a hole within the parking lot that would not drain properly. The applicant is making a good effort to preserve some existing trees on the site, but because of the proposed grade changes it may be better to remove the trees and construct the parking lot with four (4) landscape medians as shown Preliminary Grading Plan and not take the chance of the trees declining. The Landscape Ordinance required that one (1) canopy tree be planted in each parking lot landscape island. If the parking lot is built as shown on the Site Plan, there would be seven (7) trees within the southern parking lot. If the parking was built as shown on the Preliminary Grading Plan there would be eight (8) trees in the southern parking lot. It is most likely that the existing trees would not survive very long within the proposed parking lot landscape islands. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: This site drains to the east to the existing storm -sewer system in Vermilion Court. SOUTHLAKE 2025: City Council approved the recommendations made by the Southlake 2025 committee for the Areas B, E, & F study area to include the following changes: Case No. Attachment A ZA 05 -153 Page 2 Land Use Recommendations • Existing land use designations — Low Density Residential with a T -1 optional land use designation. Environment Resource Recommendations • Preserve trees to the maximum extent feasible. P &Z ACTION: January 19,2006; Approved (7 -0) subj ect to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 13, 2006; and, subject to the following conditions: • Easement provided for the subdivision monuments; • Landscaping around the monuments to be incorporated into site irrigation plan; • Wrought iron fence on the north property line be carried across the length of the property and that it be augmented with live evergreen plantings and have stone columns every 30 feet; • North bufferyard be widened to the width of 14'/2 feet to accommodate the fence and the plantings. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated February 1, 2006. N: \Community Development \MEMO \2005cases \05- 153SP.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA 05 -153 Page 3 Vicinity Map Lot 1, Block 1, Vermilion Additi n 1000 0 1400 2000 3000 Feet TIT W Is E Case No. Attachment B ZA 05 -153 Page 1 o� � w b� _lo[w ss nele aAa9�K acM/+'c b r � Vl b u O l J ^ O l l J z �-- n a 0 1 --b 0296' 0 VF}9D52'32 "E �! rmoaHt— r r �r �i _ EE L rl - O } fw7 f I S yp riles i. 3T ' Yr^h444yy'N} N�ai a I _ _ _lo[w ss nele aAa9�K acM/+'c b r � Vl b u O l J ^ O l l J z �-- n T U., L - -- - --- T -,-- F T � - 71 - 7 - Lop 2. ft� I . wn ear x— P".4" 71 j n C PAVNG r< 24 RREI ME ca filli LANVE i I PAV "-A 15� Alp 11 - I T MEWAL OFF,cc SIT9 NAPA SUMMAPY 7ko 4-W "55, LN'M gt'Y.APAloh orNy wmct EXI Rf.'G Ca ouqL G "APPADY" H : � QENER-L OM. U-1 . VJVW- RECD J AN 0 3 7006 MC w MREAZC, XT AME04 " W. (' 6;g AVE5) PRWM DJX AREAS 99KEkTACE CP aLir CO tt GE ti.540 SOFT. 1&8i9 AN K Kc WN ------ -------------- w V VERMILION COURT -4- a.. "T VERMILLION toxw sp-m I ADDITION THE CITY OF 0 W. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. PAV "-A R9= c VICINITY MAP FEWLPC."04 ...... .. .. 15� Alp 11 - I T MEWAL OFF,cc SIT9 NAPA SUMMAPY 7ko 4-W "55, LN'M gt'Y.APAloh orNy wmct m,., "APPADY" H : � EXT Lfm G U-1 . VJVW- RECD J AN 0 3 7006 MC w MREAZC, XT AME04 " W. (' 6;g AVE5) PRWM DJX AREAS 99KEkTACE CP aLir CO tt GE ti.540 SOFT. 1&8i9 WN A BL. CONC PAV140 - f ---------------- Uk-- R9= c VICINITY MAP FEWLPC."04 ...... .. .. 15� Alp 11 - I T SIT9 NAPA SUMMAPY 7ko 4-W "55, LN'M gt'Y.APAloh orNy wmct m,., "APPADY" H : � EXT Lfm G U-1 . VJVW- RECD J AN 0 3 7006 MREAZC, XT AME04 " W. (' 6;g AVE5) PRWM DJX AREAS 99KEkTACE CP aLir CO tt GE ti.540 SOFT. 1&8i9 - USKE rp V VERMILION COURT AWA Or W.51PE 5TQR.WE a.. "T VERMILLION toxw sp-m I ADDITION THE CITY OF 0 W. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. TARRANT Cou So T"mm S. OPEN SPAtE AWA pwwaAGE or MEN S'Aa is .s3gsor. 1696% r (VARI"LE WUM R O.W - ASP44LT) ALLOWARE AVER OM cowftq ' A;WAL -MVXUS om-pa [6591 15.ni MPT B PF"MO lJSF ME% Vuo' PNW. 502 2? COML Av!. WE jM20 1EXA5 15791 7 '-gom 'Am ( a 4u-0.1,9 15� Alp 11 H02 OEM 4-W "55, xn- m,., "APPADY" H : � RECD J AN 0 3 7006 o� � w 47 4HGI J 5CW( iRACi: aNOt k 4w07 PT wo: Aa1a, oca>ATr at� ca.sw iFImER:�l4TAIiLWN Drn= P LP 4PF 6. lho 1 9T:'>ZA®LWN AWpT641 )VFNVG: dl SUMMARY CHART - INTSRlOR FLKEISMN7G •roc 9rMCR. J1 L FwLT Lv SITS DATA SUMMAR 2�' AG _umrt 6 Vo- YEk PENSItr RE99ENTMA aANO USE OE9CA10.RW fASRgG IIf1A1Q OI . uS 1 0 -1 n GROSS A[.REAFIAWT, AMA% 71,655 SOT" (1 649 ACS2'S) P + € I� V � l3,s40 SO,[T. PETi WAC{ O[ MIX M.BSSAGE fflwa (N l 1 WN aocx [¢dcu 6+ /� sQ sdri 47 4HGI J 5CW( iRACi: aNOt k 4w07 PT wo: Aa1a, oca>ATr at� ca.sw iFImER:�l4TAIiLWN Drn= P LP 4PF 6. lho 1 9T:'>ZA®LWN AWpT641 )VFNVG: dl SUMMARY CHART - INTSRlOR FLKEISMN7G •roc SITS DATA SUMMAR _umrt aANO USE OE9CA10.RW fASRgG IIf1A1Q OI . uS 1 0 -1 GROSS A[.REAFIAWT, AMA% 71,655 SOT" (1 649 ACS2'S) P + € PA1PMD %m AREAS l3,s40 SO,[T. PETi WAC{ O[ MIX M.BSSAGE fflwa WN aocx [¢dcu 6+ /� sQ sdri a7 sv ,AtS� J',[,Sa OY5CSIP TOTAL sPA{g$ REIXllxpl PAQV.XD PAANttJG 7s 'PASTS 75 SPA4s VERMILION COURT AREA OF UUTSLDE SIp1AfE Rz LOT L BLOCK 1 RLOWED t0AWG SPACES Q VERMILLION ADDITION PR YUD LQADWO SPACES Q THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, OnN SPACE' ASEA M.5 F*, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PERrLr lAa OF mEV 7ACE )6.95E ALLOWARL[- W?ERIRRR WKRAGE• 45,690 SOFT 654. ACTUAL GW .RVQM W OERAGE 45, 291 sQri @,. PRW111111 U$[: SSItl4 Ow R; PAXORAyA PMRT£5 E AE k 503 H EAFMOk AVE, SFE 1120 SOUTKLUE, T€#AS. 74092 F++ (anp 4m -TWA FAIL (g17� 488-0619 Mr PLIAW Li'!'.Y ctvJe LVFY M SOUTMAU !f(11Fd1FR RECD JAll 2 5 AMMER xv ,wA Ap W �In Mlr iZ C l l b r z r SITF PLAN ' W. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. u�F (VARIABLE WiPH R.O.W. - ASPHALT] o� � w i b � 1 FRONT ELE 7701V - AE5T SOU1H'LAKE 6'L W. RIGHT SJDE CLLEV ROW - VERUILION COURT _ RECD ' f{��[� 1A�� 2 � Ll3Lfli o� � w i b � rA n wurosriax REAR ECZVA MAI rJ SEeEC]W V -n• , �;.r mu s !3� IL' -u' h H6 ^yL nn ce •j! I cEr ��EIa rranr Case No. ZA 05 -153 Attachment C Page 6 PROPOSED TRELLIS STRUCTURE BETWEEN BUILDINGS Case No. ZA 05 -153 Attachment C Page 7 PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIALS % i i Case No. Attachment C ZA 05 -153 Page 8 VERMILION GARDEN OFFICES FENCE & SCREENING EXHIBITS THIS TYPE OF STONE TO BE USED TO BUILD STONE COLUMNS APPROXIMATELY EVERY 32' ALONG LENGTH OF WROUGHT IRON FENCE II szli:� f l 1 r �rw ABOVE ARE PICTURES OF THE EXISTING WROUGHT IRON FENCE. WE PROPOSE TO EXTEND THIS FENCING TO THE EXISTING SUBDIVISON ENTRANCE MONUMENT (SEE PICTURE ABOVE). THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THIS FENCE AND THE WROUGHT IRON FENCE TO BE ADDED SHALL HAVE STONE COLUMNS EVERY 4 FENCE PANELS OR APPROXIMATELY 32'. THE ENTIRE LENGTH SHALL BE PLANTED WITH 5 GALLON EVERGREEN WAX MYRTLES (MYRICA CERIFERA) 5' ON CENTER. INITIAL PLANT HEIGHT WILL BE APPROXIMATLEY 3' TALL. WAX MYRTLES WILL GROW 12 " -24" EACH YEAR TO A MATURE HEIGHT OF 10' TO 15' TALL. Case No. Attachment C ZA 05 -153 Page 9 cddcRcc (5?d ft6P71 O'l,lIcifO.S 2 Panorama Properties, L.P. dba Cadence Custom Homes 502 N. Carroll Ave ##120 Southlake, TX 76092 January 16, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake, TX 76092 RE: Case No. ZA 05 -153 Dear Commission, During our SPIN meeting, homeowners in the Vermilion subdivision had concerns about the access drive to our office site, the existing stone entrance monuments to the residential subdivision and the wood fence shown on our site plan application. The neighbors expressed a desire for us to change our access drive to be off of Southlake Boulevard instead of Vermilion Court. We informed the residents that during our inspection period prior to purchase of the property, we were told by city staff that access to our site would not be allowed off of Southlake Boulevard. The stone entrance monuments to the residential subdivision were constructed on our commercial site and in the city right -of -way. They had concerns that our development plan might include removal of the monuments. We assured them that they could remain where they are and that we had created an easement for such (see attached deed). An easement for the portion in the city right -of -way already exists. In addition, we have agreed to provide irrigation to the plantings at the base of the stone monument with our development plan. Maintenance of the monument and the plantings will remain the responsibility of the homeowners. There was much discussion regarding fence /screening issues at the January 9 °i SPIN meeting: The decision was made to meet again on site on Saturday, January 14`" at 9 a.m. and discuss further. It was agreed that the current wrought iron fence separating the commercial site and the residential homesite to the north would remain. We agreed to add wrought iron fencing eastward and connecting to the subdivision monument at the northeast corner of the commercial site. We agreed to add stone columns approximately every 32' along the entire length of the 502 N. Carroll ilvc., Mile 120 . Soulhlake, - rX 760 (W) 485- • wv v�v.CarlenreCustomHoincs.com e Fax (517) 4M - 0817 R>=n es i V7 2!N6 Z A 0 5_153 Case No. Attachment C ZA 05 -153 Page 10 existing and new wrought iron fence. The visual screening would be accomplished with planting materials in accordance with the zoning ordinance. Given the topography, we request to move the proposed retaining wall along the north boundary of our site south S' allowing the plant screening material to be planted at the higher elevation and have more effect. We would also request to move the bufferyard south 5' to allow for the relocated retaining wall. There was also discussion regarding the other office site that we own to the east across Vermilion Court. Although there currently are no definitive plans for this site, as part of our future development plan we agree to include as part of our site plan request, wrought iron fencing from the subdivision monument eastward approximately parallel to the front facade of the home to the north. From that point eastward to the drainage easement, approval to build an eight foot tall wood fence on top of the existing retaining wall be requested. Although difficult to determine at this time, if the pad height of the building(s) to be built is raised, we request approval to build a retaining wall even with the height of the new building pad along the north property line connecting to the existing retaining wall. The wood screening fence would then be placed upon the top of the retaining wall. The wrought iron and wood fencing would include stone columns approximately every 32' feet similar to the other commercial site. To allow for rainfall runoff, no retaining walls or fencing is proposed to be built in the drainage easement to the east. Thank you for your consideration on these matters. Sincere y, Will Edgington Case No. Attachment C ZA 05 -153 Page 11 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA05 -153 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 02/01/06 Project Name: Site Plan — Vermilion Court Garden Offices (Lot 1, Block 1, Vermilion Addition) APPLICANT: Panorama Properties, Ltd. ARCHITECT: Will Edgington 502 N. Carroll Ave, Suite 120 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 488 -9000 Phone: Fax: (817) 488 -0819 Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/03/06 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT (817) 748 -8602. The following changes are needed with regard to labeling: a. Show and label all existing easements. b. Dimension the overall R.O.W. widths for both W. Southlake Blvd and Vermilion Court. Dimension the traveled roadway width for W. Southlake Blvd. 2. The following pertain to bufferyards and screening: a. Adjust the northernmost row of parking so that all portions, to include the curb, are outside of the proposed 15' — Type "F -1" bufferyard. Parking is not permitted to encroach into a bufferyard. Provide cross - hatching and shading for all landscaping (pervious) areas. The pervious areas adjacent to the buildings have not all been shaded. 4. Correct the stacking depth of the drive to be 30'. City Council approved a stacking depth of 30'w ith approval of the concept plan. The plan labels a stacking depth of 29'. Provide increased wall offsets to meet horizontal articulation requirements on the south, west and east fagades. The dominant wall height is 12. S'on the south fa(ade and 14' on the east and west fa(ades requiring an off -set of approximately 2'. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS A stacking depth of 30' was approved by City Council on September 4, 2001 with approval of a concept plan as part of a change of zoning to "O -1" Office District. * The driveway location onto Vermilion Court was approved by City Council on September 4, 2001 Case No. Attachment D ZA 05 -153 Page 1 with approval of a concept plan as part of a change of zoning to "O -l" Office District. The driveway on Vermilion Court, a local street, is permitted as there is no access permitted on W. Southlake Blvd due to spacing requirements from the intersection. A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans /documents and conditions of approval is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or before acceptance of any other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be reviewed and stamped "approved" by the Planning Department. All development must comply with the City's Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and detain all post development run -off. * The proposed site does not exceed the maximum permitted impervious coverage area percentage of 65% for the "O-l" Zoning District. The impervious coverage area percentage of this is approximately 63%. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. A letter of permission from the adjacent property owner(s) on the west must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the off -site pavement. Case No. Attachment D ZA 05 -153 Page 2 Case No. 05 -153 Review No. _ Dated: Januaa 11, 2006 Number of Pages: 1 Project Name: Vermilion Court Garden Offices (Site Plan) Comments due to the Planning Department: January 11, 2006 Contact: Keith Martin Phone: (817) 748 -8229 Fax: (817) 481 -5713 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on January 3, 2006 . Comments designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P &Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. Are the bufferyards correctly shown and labeled? Yes. Does the plan meet the interior landscape requirements? Yes, except for the proposed width of the parking lot landscape islands. Does the plan meet the parking lot landscaping requirements? Yes. Are the parking /bufferyard /landscaping summary charts correct? Yes. Is a tree survey required? A tree survey of the property was provided with the Site Plan submittal. Tree Preservation Comments: The Site Plan parking lot layout does not match the Preliminary Grading Plan parking lot layout. 2. All of the existing trees except for one (1) 12" Hackberry are located within the parking lot, within 6' feet of a building or within an access drive. The applicant is proposing to combine the parking lot landscape islands to preserve two (2) of the existing trees located in the proposed southern parking lot but the proposed grade changes or elevations of the parking lot would leave the trees within the landscape islands one foot (1') below grade. The trees would be built into a hole within the parking lot that would not drain properly. The applicant is making a good effort to preserve some existing trees on the site but because of the proposed grade changes it may be better to remove the trees and Case No. ZA 05 -153 Attachment D Page 3 construct the parking lot with four (4) landscape medians as shown Preliminary Grading Plan and not take the chance of the trees declining. The Landscape Ordinance required that one (1) canopy tree be planted in each parking lot landscape island. If the parking lot is built as shown on the Site Plan, there would be seven (7) trees within the southern parking lot. If the parking was built as shown on the Preliminary Grading Plan there would be eight (8) trees in the southern parking lot. It is most likely that the existing trees would not survive very long within the proposed parking lot landscape islands. Case No. ZA 05 -153 Attachment D Page 4 Surrounding Property Owners Lot 1, Block 1, Vermilion Addition 17 18 16 19 _ J 15 20 LL J 14 21 ---� Ljj J 13 2E 22 Q� LJJ W 5 > 6 1 4 7 2 3 8 SO,L- r��RKE g�4 12 9 11 10 Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage 1. City of Southlake SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.724 2. Simmons Properties Group Harper, Sondra K & Ter S -P -1 Office Commercial 2.176 3. Wilbow Southlake Development 0-1 Low Density Residential 1.649 4. Grant, Patricia SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 5. Elwell, Justin SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 6. Jenson, Jarod M SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 7. Rodriguez, John P & Araceli SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 8. Wilbow Southlake Development 0-1 Low Density Residential 1.648 9. J N S Land Family Limited Prt AG Medium Density Residential 4.019 10. Schaefer, Paul James AG Medium Density Residential 1.16 11. Schaefer, Paul J AG Medium Density Residential 2.36 12. Horn & Toad Properties AG Medium Density Residential 4.025 Case No. Attachment E ZA 05 -153 Page 1 13. Fard, Parvaneh SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 14. Anderson, Gerald SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 15. Crider, Anthony D & Marsha SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 16. Sakaloskt, Christopher M SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 17. Reig Incorporated SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.035 18. Reig Incorporated SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.048 19. Fey, Michael SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 20. Miller, Mark L & Rebecca L SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 21. Nash, Mark T & Sharon T SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 22. Gaszak, Russell & Andrea G SF-IA Low Density Residential 1.0 Case No. ZA 05 -153 Attachment E Page 2 Surrounding Property Owners Lot 1, Block 1, Vermilion Addition Notices Sent: Twelve (12) Responses Received: None (0) Case No. ZA 05 -153 Attachment F Page 1