Item 7ICity of Southlake
Department of Planning
S T A F F R E P O R T
January 11, 2006
ZA05-091
CASE NO:
Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Stonebridge Park at Southlake Phase II
PROJECT:
REQUEST:On behalf of Rheta Mae Miller, RealtyCapital Corporation is requesting approval of a
zoning change and concept plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “S-P-2” Generalized Site
PlanDistrict.Sixnew office and six new retail/office buildings totaling approximately
61,650 square feet are proposed.
Under the “S-P-2” zoning the applicant proposes the following (see Attachment C):
“C-2” Local-Retail Commercial District uses and development regulations on Lots 1 through 4, to
exclude the following uses:
Drugstores; Frozen food lockers; Grocery storesand meat markets; cafeterias, fastfood,and
o
“Take-out” food restaurants; and Tires, batteries, and automobile accessory sales.
“O-1” Office District uses and development regulations on Lots 5 through 10.
Parking - A parking ratio of 1 space per 193 square feet of building area for the entire site
Screening – A 6’ wrought iron fence along the specified lot boundaries
Bufferyards – Bufferyards along interior lot lines shall not be required
Parking – Required parking shall be permitted along the public street right-of-way
The following variances are being requested (see Attachment C):
Public Street R.OW. – Minimum 60 ft required, 40 ft. R.O.W. with 30 ft. pavement width is
proposed.
Driveway Stacking – Min. 28 ft & 50 ft required, 20 ft fordrivesand0ftforparkingadjacentto
the street is proposed.
Driveway Spacing to Intersection – Min. 500 ft required on FM 1709. 263 ft proposed
Street Frontage–Alllotsmustfronton public street. Lot 10 fronts on common access easement.
A Revised concept plan has beensubmittedrotating buildings 1 & 2. A variance is needed
to approve the setback of building 2 duetoan encroachment into the 40-foot setback
required adjacent to single family residential property.
1. Conduct public hearing
ACTION NEEDED:
2. Consider second reading for zoning change and concept plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) BackgroundInformation
(B) VicinityMap
(C)Plans and Support Information
Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated January 11, 2006
(D)
(E)Surrounding Property Owners Map
(F)Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(G)Ordinance No. 480-474
(H)Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (748-8067) or Dennis Killough (748-8072)
Case No.
ZA05-091
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Rheta MaeMiller
APPLICANT: Realty CapitalCorporation
PROPERTY SITUATION:The property is located at 2502 W. Southlake Blvd.
LEGALDESCRIPTION:Tracts 2E, 2F, 2F1, & 2F2, situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract
No. 18
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential with a T-1 overlay option
CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District
HISTORY:There is no development history on this property.
TRANSPORTATION
Master Thoroughfare Plan
ASSESSMENT:
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Boulevard to have
130 feet of right-of-way. Adequate right-of-way exists for this roadway.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
Stonebridge Park Phase 2 is proposing a street that will intersect with W.
Southlake Boulevard. The applicant is proposing the street to have a right-
of-way width of 40 feet with 10-footutility easements on either side in lieu
of the standard right-of-way width of 60 feet for commercial streets. All lots
in the development will have access onto the proposed street.
W. Southlake Boulevard is a five-lane, undivided thoroughfare with a
continuous, two-way, center left-turn lane. The width of the roadway is
sufficient to be a seven-lane roadway.
May, 2005 traffic counts on W. Southlake Blvd (between Pearson Ln &
F.M. 1938)
17,30316,915
24hrWest Bound (WB) ()East Bound (EB) ()
9001,881
WBPeak A.M. ()Peak P.M. ()
11:15– 12:15 a.m.5:30 – 6:30 p.m.
1,6261,186
EBPeak A.M. () 7 – 8 a.m.Peak P.M. () 5 – 6 p.m.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA05-091Page 1
Traffic Impact
UseSq.Ft.Vtpd*AM-AM-PM-PM-
INOUTINOUT
Office/Retail Park 61,65070495121380
*Vehicle Trips Per Day
**The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel
times on W. Southlake Boulevard.
PATHWAYS MASTER
PLAN: According to the Master Pathways Plan, an 8-foot multi-use trail is planned
adjacent to the development along W. Southlake Boulevard and along the
creek channel. The trails are shown on the concept plan.
WATER & SEWER: An 8-inch water line currently exists along the north side of W. Southlake
Boulevard adjacent to this lot. The applicant is proposing to extend a 6-inch
sanitary sewer line from the west.
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: The southern and western portions of the development will drain to the street,
which will carry the storm water through the storm drain system to the
proposed detention pond. The detention pond will outfall into the existing
channel which runs through the development. The northern portion of the
development will drain directly into the existing channel.
TREE PRESERVATION: The Landscape Administrator has no tree preservation comments for this
item.
SOUTHLAKE 2025: City Council approved the recommendations made by the Southlake 2025
committee for the Davis Boulevard study area to include the following
changes:
Land Use Recommendations
LU: Low Density Residential/T-1. The proposed development does not
meet the intent of the Low Density Residential or T-1 land use categories.
Site Specific Recommendation (from the Davis/F.M. 1938 Corridor
Plan): Encourage lower intensity office and/or residential uses
transitioning to the existing neighborhoods to the north and west. C-2
uses are proposed for Lots 2-5. Consider lower intensity office uses on
these lots to transition to the existing residential properties to the west.
Mobility Plan Recommendations
Continue to improve bicycle and pedestrian circulation. Provide
sidewalks/trails along all streets. Encourage the development of a
pedestrian greenway along floodplains and creeks. Specifically,
Southlake Pathways recommends an 8’ multi-use trail linking Florence
Road to F.M. 1709. The recommended trail along the floodplain is
shown on the plan and sidewalks are shown along Street A.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA05-091Page 2
Encourage automobile and pedestrian connectivity between adjoining
commercial developments in the corridor. This in turn will reduce auto
trips and turning movements on the arterial roadways and improve level
of service. The proposed development has provided common access
easements on the east and west to adjoining properties. Sidewalks in the
proposed development are also shown to connect to the sidewalks in
Stonebridge Park Phase I.
Environmental Resource Protection Recommendations
Preserve the floodplain as a natural stream corridor and as an asset to the
development of the site. Encourage the preservation of a tree buffer
adjoining the floodplain corridor. Protect the area’s surface and
groundwater sources from contamination. The concept plan indicates
that the existing channel and pond will be preserved. However, several
trees adjacent to the floodplain will be eliminated with the development
of Lot 10. To prevent polluted runoff from entering the creek and to
protect the existing trees, consider leaving Lot 10 as open space.
P&Z ACTION: November 17, 2005; Approved to table (5-0) until December 8, 2005.
December 8, 2005; Approved (6-1) subject to Concept Plan Review
Summary No. 3, dated November 11, 2005; allowing a cross access easement
to the property on the east; extending sidewalks to the north; wrought iron
fencing on the north and west sides; lighting will be as presented; and,
granting the requested variances.
COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council approved the first reading of this item noting that due to the
fact this development is consistent with the development to the east and has
low impervious coverage ratio and subject t the following:
1) Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated November 11, 2005;
2) Requiring conformance with the architectural and lighting standards
as shown on attachment ‘G’ in the staff report;
3) Subject to the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning
Commission;
4) Eliminating retail use on Lots 3 & 4;
5) Requiring that any certificate of occupancy be contingent upon
review and approval by City Council of the landscaping plan;
6) Requiring the reorientation of the buildings on Lots 1 and 2 prior to
second reading;
7) Requiring a cross access parking agreement;
8) Acknowledging the developer’s commitment that the pond shown on
the plan will be a retention pond and will be an aesthetic feature of
the development.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated January 11, 2006.
Please note that the Zoning and Development Plan as proposed is not
Case No. Attachment A
ZA05-091Page 3
compliant with the City’s Master Land Use Plan’s “Low Density
Residential” Land Use Designation. A justification letter from the applicant
is included as part of Attachment ‘C’. Any motion for approval of this item
should include justification for non-compliance with the Land Use Plan.
N:\Community Development\MEMO\2005cases\05-091ZCP.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA05-091Page 4
Case No. Attachment B
ZA05-091Page 1
ST
PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED CONCEPT PLAN REVIEWED AT 1 READING
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-091Page 1
REVISED CONCEPT PLAN
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-091Page 2
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-091Page 3
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-091Page 4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-091Page 5
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-091Page 6
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-091Page 7
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-091Page 8
Case No. Case No. Attachment C Attachment C
ZZAA05-09105-091Page 9Page 9
Proposed Architectural Styles
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-091Page 10
Proposed Lighting Styles
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-091Page 11
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA05-091Four01/11/06
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Concept Plan
Project Name: – Stonebridge Park, Phase II
APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation ENGINEER: William M. Smith & Associates
Rian Maguire Sol H. Stigall
99 Main Street 404 Mary Street
Colleyville, TX 76034 Arlington, TX 76010
Phone: (817) 488-4200 Phone: (817) 265-7166
Fax: (817) 424-2448 Fax: (817) 861-0339
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVEDBYTHECITYON01/11/06ANDWE
OFFER THE FOLLOWINGSTIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVEANYQUESTIONS
OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER (817) 748-8602.
1.Provide a 40’ setback for building 2 as it is adjacent to single-family residential property.The
Residential Adjacency Overlay permits a single-story building no taller than 20’ in height no closer
(A variance is
than within 40’ of property zoned or planned for single family residential uses.
requested.)
2.The following changes are needed with regard to driveways:
a.Provide a public street meeting the regulations found in Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 for
(A variance
commercial streets. Commercial streets are required a minimum 60’ of R.O.W.
has been requested.)
b.Provide the minimum spacing from a driveway to an intersection on Southlake Boulevard.
Spacing from a driveway to an intersection is required to be 500’ on Southlake Boulevard.
(A variance has been requested.)
(A
c.All lots are required to have frontage on a public street. Lot 10 does not have frontage.
variance has been requested.)
d.Provide the minimum stacking depth for all drives on Street A. A stacking depth of 28’ or
(A variance has been requested.)
50’ is required for several drives on Stonebridge Lane.
e.Label the distances between proposed ingress/egress centerlines, distances to the nearest
street right-of-way intersection, and distances to the nearest existing driveway centerlines
off-site in both directions of the site.Several labels have not been provided.
3.Identify and label all proposed fire lanes.Fire lanes must meet hose-lay coverage requirements.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA05-091Page 1
4.Sufficient parking must be provided per individual lot unless a written agreement is properly
executed and filed as outlined in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended (Sec
35.2.b).A copy of the agreement must be provided to the City prior to receiving building permits.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS
* Any plan revisions or supplemental information required following a Planning and Zoning
Commission or City Council hearing must be submitted to the City Planning Department no later
than 5:00PM the following Monday. A minimum of twelve (12) full size copies and one (1) 11”
x 17” reduction is required for any plans. If not received by the deadline, the application may be
tabled until the next meeting agenda.
A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans/documents and conditions of approval
*
is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or before acceptance of any
other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be reviewed and stamped “approved” by
the Planning Department.
All development must comply with the City’s Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and detain all post
*
development run-off.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in
the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be
submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the
following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* This site falls within the applicability of the residential adjacency standards as amended by Ordinance 480-
CC, Section 43, Part III “Residential Adjacency Standards” as well as the Corridor Overlay Zone regulations
in Section 43, Part II. Although no review of the following issues is provided with this concept plan, the
applicant must evaluate the site for compliance prior to submittal of the site plan. A Site Plan must be
submitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council prior to issuance of a
Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the
building permit.
applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements:
•Masonry requirements per §43.13a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as
amended.
•Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended
•Mechanical Equipment Screening
•Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on all building facades) per §43.13d,
Ordinance 480, as amended.
•Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480, as
amended.
•Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.13i and §43.13j, Ordinance 480, as amended.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA05-091Page 2
•Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for
vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No. 480, as
amended.
•Screening as per §39.4, Ordinance 480, as amended.
•Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544.
•Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA05-091Page 3
Surrounding Property Owners
2502 W. Southlake Blvd
Stonebridge Park at Southlake Phase II
OwnerZoningLandUseAcreage
1.Southlake Church of Christ CSPublic / Semi-Public8.896
2.Hallmark, Clara Maye Est SF-1ALow Density Residential 1.061
3.Brankin, James T & Andrea J SF-1ALow Density Residential 3.34
4.Cooper, Rickey A & Barbara SF-1ALow Density Residential 7.057
Smith, Ryan T & Cathy
5.Thoennes, Paul & Mary G SF-1ALow Density Residential 2.0
6.O’Leary, Patrick M SF-1ALow Density Residential 2.0
7.Bonola Family Ltd Prtnshp SF-1ALow Density Residential 2.0
White, Herbert R
Case No. Attachment E
ZA05-091Page 1
8.Stonebridge Monticello Pt Ltd S-P-2Office Commercial 3.173
9.Stonebridge Monticello Pt Ltd S-P-2Office Commercial 1.515
10.Stonebridge Monticello Pt Ltd S-P-2Office Commercial 2.112
11.Southlake Stonebridge Park S-P-2Office / Retail Commercial 3.696
12.Garner, Robert & Billie SF-1ALow Density Residential 3.285
13.Bedgood, James E SF-1ALow Density Residential 4.15
14.Lam, Conner AGOffice Commercial 2.64
15.White, Herbert SF-1ALow Density Residential 1.78
Bonola Family Ltd Prtnshp
16.Miller, Rheta Mae AGLow Density Residential 6.992
17.Miller, Rheta Mae AGLow Density Residential 2.715
18.Miller, Rheta Mae AGLow Density Residential 2.03
19.Miller, Rheta Mae AGLow Density Residential 0.46
Case No. Attachment E
ZA05-091Page 2
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
2502 W. Southlake Blvd
Stonebridge Park at Southlake Phase II
Notices Sent: Sixteen (16)
Responses: None (0)
Case No. Attachment F
ZA 05-091 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-474
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS
2E, 2F, 2F1, & 2F2, SITUATED IN THE JESSE G. ALLEN SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 18, BEING APPROXIMATELY 12.27 ACRES, AND
MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A”
FROM “AG” AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO “S-P-2”
GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH “C-2” LOCAL-RETAIL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES AND “O-1” OFFICE DISTRICT
USES, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN
ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT
“B”, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN
THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP;
PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS,
the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the
electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local
Government Code; and,
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to
adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other
structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and
map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with
a comprehensive plan; and
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091 Page1
WHEREAS,
the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “AG” Agricultural District under
the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS,
a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or
corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City
Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be
granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area
immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare
of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood;
location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size
and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and
in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-
street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and
protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health
ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
facilities; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things
the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value
of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the
amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091 Page2
improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was
made; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning
lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the
health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids
undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity
and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the
conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a
change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective
changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best
interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general
health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas,
passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the
permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described
below:
Being Tracts 2E, 2F, 2F1, & 2F2, situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, being
approximately 12.27 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from
“AG” Agricultural District to “S-P-2” Detailed Site Plan District with “C-2” Local-Retail
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091 Page3
Commercial District uses and “O-1” Office District uses as depicted on the approved Concept
Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following
specific conditions, if any:
1.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,
Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to
all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent
ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words,
phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby
ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the
comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the
community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably
anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and
air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the
adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete
hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar
suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the
most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091 Page4
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas,
affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where
provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity
of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be
invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land
described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or
who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute
a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the
provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at
the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,
both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by
this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its
caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091 Page5
fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition
of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall
additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage
of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required
by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of ___________, 2006.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of __________, 2006.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091 Page6
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091 Page7
EXHIBIT “A”
Being Tracts 2E, 2F, 2F1, & 2F2, situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, being approximately
12.27 acres:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091Page8
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091Page9
EXHIBIT “B”
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091Page10
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091Page11
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091Page12
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091Page13
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091Page14
Case No. Case No. Attachment G Attachment G
ZZAA05-09105-091PagePage1515
Proposed Architectural Styles
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091Page16
Proposed Lighting Styles
Case No. Attachment G
ZA05-091Page17