Loading...
Item 7ICity of Southlake Department of Planning S T A F F R E P O R T January 11, 2006 ZA05-091 CASE NO: Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Stonebridge Park at Southlake Phase II PROJECT: REQUEST:On behalf of Rheta Mae Miller, RealtyCapital Corporation is requesting approval of a zoning change and concept plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “S-P-2” Generalized Site PlanDistrict.Sixnew office and six new retail/office buildings totaling approximately 61,650 square feet are proposed. Under the “S-P-2” zoning the applicant proposes the following (see Attachment C): “C-2” Local-Retail Commercial District uses and development regulations on Lots 1 through 4, to exclude the following uses: Drugstores; Frozen food lockers; Grocery storesand meat markets; cafeterias, fastfood,and o “Take-out” food restaurants; and Tires, batteries, and automobile accessory sales. “O-1” Office District uses and development regulations on Lots 5 through 10. Parking - A parking ratio of 1 space per 193 square feet of building area for the entire site Screening – A 6’ wrought iron fence along the specified lot boundaries Bufferyards – Bufferyards along interior lot lines shall not be required Parking – Required parking shall be permitted along the public street right-of-way The following variances are being requested (see Attachment C): Public Street R.OW. – Minimum 60 ft required, 40 ft. R.O.W. with 30 ft. pavement width is proposed. Driveway Stacking – Min. 28 ft & 50 ft required, 20 ft fordrivesand0ftforparkingadjacentto the street is proposed. Driveway Spacing to Intersection – Min. 500 ft required on FM 1709. 263 ft proposed Street Frontage–Alllotsmustfronton public street. Lot 10 fronts on common access easement. A Revised concept plan has beensubmittedrotating buildings 1 & 2. A variance is needed to approve the setback of building 2 duetoan encroachment into the 40-foot setback required adjacent to single family residential property. 1. Conduct public hearing ACTION NEEDED: 2. Consider second reading for zoning change and concept plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) BackgroundInformation (B) VicinityMap (C)Plans and Support Information Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated January 11, 2006 (D) (E)Surrounding Property Owners Map (F)Surrounding Property Owners Responses (G)Ordinance No. 480-474 (H)Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (748-8067) or Dennis Killough (748-8072) Case No. ZA05-091 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Rheta MaeMiller APPLICANT: Realty CapitalCorporation PROPERTY SITUATION:The property is located at 2502 W. Southlake Blvd. LEGALDESCRIPTION:Tracts 2E, 2F, 2F1, & 2F2, situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18 LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential with a T-1 overlay option CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District HISTORY:There is no development history on this property. TRANSPORTATION Master Thoroughfare Plan ASSESSMENT: The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Southlake Boulevard to have 130 feet of right-of-way. Adequate right-of-way exists for this roadway. Existing Area Road Network and Conditions Stonebridge Park Phase 2 is proposing a street that will intersect with W. Southlake Boulevard. The applicant is proposing the street to have a right- of-way width of 40 feet with 10-footutility easements on either side in lieu of the standard right-of-way width of 60 feet for commercial streets. All lots in the development will have access onto the proposed street. W. Southlake Boulevard is a five-lane, undivided thoroughfare with a continuous, two-way, center left-turn lane. The width of the roadway is sufficient to be a seven-lane roadway. May, 2005 traffic counts on W. Southlake Blvd (between Pearson Ln & F.M. 1938) 17,30316,915 24hrWest Bound (WB) ()East Bound (EB) () 9001,881 WBPeak A.M. ()Peak P.M. () 11:15– 12:15 a.m.5:30 – 6:30 p.m. 1,6261,186 EBPeak A.M. () 7 – 8 a.m.Peak P.M. () 5 – 6 p.m. Case No. Attachment A ZA05-091Page 1 Traffic Impact UseSq.Ft.Vtpd*AM-AM-PM-PM- INOUTINOUT Office/Retail Park 61,65070495121380 *Vehicle Trips Per Day **The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times on W. Southlake Boulevard. PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN: According to the Master Pathways Plan, an 8-foot multi-use trail is planned adjacent to the development along W. Southlake Boulevard and along the creek channel. The trails are shown on the concept plan. WATER & SEWER: An 8-inch water line currently exists along the north side of W. Southlake Boulevard adjacent to this lot. The applicant is proposing to extend a 6-inch sanitary sewer line from the west. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: The southern and western portions of the development will drain to the street, which will carry the storm water through the storm drain system to the proposed detention pond. The detention pond will outfall into the existing channel which runs through the development. The northern portion of the development will drain directly into the existing channel. TREE PRESERVATION: The Landscape Administrator has no tree preservation comments for this item. SOUTHLAKE 2025: City Council approved the recommendations made by the Southlake 2025 committee for the Davis Boulevard study area to include the following changes: Land Use Recommendations LU: Low Density Residential/T-1. The proposed development does not meet the intent of the Low Density Residential or T-1 land use categories. Site Specific Recommendation (from the Davis/F.M. 1938 Corridor Plan): Encourage lower intensity office and/or residential uses transitioning to the existing neighborhoods to the north and west. C-2 uses are proposed for Lots 2-5. Consider lower intensity office uses on these lots to transition to the existing residential properties to the west. Mobility Plan Recommendations Continue to improve bicycle and pedestrian circulation. Provide sidewalks/trails along all streets. Encourage the development of a pedestrian greenway along floodplains and creeks. Specifically, Southlake Pathways recommends an 8’ multi-use trail linking Florence Road to F.M. 1709. The recommended trail along the floodplain is shown on the plan and sidewalks are shown along Street A. Case No. Attachment A ZA05-091Page 2 Encourage automobile and pedestrian connectivity between adjoining commercial developments in the corridor. This in turn will reduce auto trips and turning movements on the arterial roadways and improve level of service. The proposed development has provided common access easements on the east and west to adjoining properties. Sidewalks in the proposed development are also shown to connect to the sidewalks in Stonebridge Park Phase I. Environmental Resource Protection Recommendations Preserve the floodplain as a natural stream corridor and as an asset to the development of the site. Encourage the preservation of a tree buffer adjoining the floodplain corridor. Protect the area’s surface and groundwater sources from contamination. The concept plan indicates that the existing channel and pond will be preserved. However, several trees adjacent to the floodplain will be eliminated with the development of Lot 10. To prevent polluted runoff from entering the creek and to protect the existing trees, consider leaving Lot 10 as open space. P&Z ACTION: November 17, 2005; Approved to table (5-0) until December 8, 2005. December 8, 2005; Approved (6-1) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated November 11, 2005; allowing a cross access easement to the property on the east; extending sidewalks to the north; wrought iron fencing on the north and west sides; lighting will be as presented; and, granting the requested variances. COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council approved the first reading of this item noting that due to the fact this development is consistent with the development to the east and has low impervious coverage ratio and subject t the following: 1) Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated November 11, 2005; 2) Requiring conformance with the architectural and lighting standards as shown on attachment ‘G’ in the staff report; 3) Subject to the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission; 4) Eliminating retail use on Lots 3 & 4; 5) Requiring that any certificate of occupancy be contingent upon review and approval by City Council of the landscaping plan; 6) Requiring the reorientation of the buildings on Lots 1 and 2 prior to second reading; 7) Requiring a cross access parking agreement; 8) Acknowledging the developer’s commitment that the pond shown on the plan will be a retention pond and will be an aesthetic feature of the development. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated January 11, 2006. Please note that the Zoning and Development Plan as proposed is not Case No. Attachment A ZA05-091Page 3 compliant with the City’s Master Land Use Plan’s “Low Density Residential” Land Use Designation. A justification letter from the applicant is included as part of Attachment ‘C’. Any motion for approval of this item should include justification for non-compliance with the Land Use Plan. N:\Community Development\MEMO\2005cases\05-091ZCP.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA05-091Page 4 Case No. Attachment B ZA05-091Page 1 ST PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED CONCEPT PLAN REVIEWED AT 1 READING Case No. Attachment C ZA05-091Page 1 REVISED CONCEPT PLAN Case No. Attachment C ZA05-091Page 2 Case No. Attachment C ZA05-091Page 3 Case No. Attachment C ZA05-091Page 4 Case No. Attachment C ZA05-091Page 5 Case No. Attachment C ZA05-091Page 6 Case No. Attachment C ZA05-091Page 7 Case No. Attachment C ZA05-091Page 8 Case No. Case No. Attachment C Attachment C ZZAA05-09105-091Page 9Page 9 Proposed Architectural Styles Case No. Attachment C ZA05-091Page 10 Proposed Lighting Styles Case No. Attachment C ZA05-091Page 11 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ZA05-091Four01/11/06 Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review: Concept Plan Project Name: – Stonebridge Park, Phase II APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation ENGINEER: William M. Smith & Associates Rian Maguire Sol H. Stigall 99 Main Street 404 Mary Street Colleyville, TX 76034 Arlington, TX 76010 Phone: (817) 488-4200 Phone: (817) 265-7166 Fax: (817) 424-2448 Fax: (817) 861-0339 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVEDBYTHECITYON01/11/06ANDWE OFFER THE FOLLOWINGSTIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVEANYQUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER (817) 748-8602. 1.Provide a 40’ setback for building 2 as it is adjacent to single-family residential property.The Residential Adjacency Overlay permits a single-story building no taller than 20’ in height no closer (A variance is than within 40’ of property zoned or planned for single family residential uses. requested.) 2.The following changes are needed with regard to driveways: a.Provide a public street meeting the regulations found in Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 for (A variance commercial streets. Commercial streets are required a minimum 60’ of R.O.W. has been requested.) b.Provide the minimum spacing from a driveway to an intersection on Southlake Boulevard. Spacing from a driveway to an intersection is required to be 500’ on Southlake Boulevard. (A variance has been requested.) (A c.All lots are required to have frontage on a public street. Lot 10 does not have frontage. variance has been requested.) d.Provide the minimum stacking depth for all drives on Street A. A stacking depth of 28’ or (A variance has been requested.) 50’ is required for several drives on Stonebridge Lane. e.Label the distances between proposed ingress/egress centerlines, distances to the nearest street right-of-way intersection, and distances to the nearest existing driveway centerlines off-site in both directions of the site.Several labels have not been provided. 3.Identify and label all proposed fire lanes.Fire lanes must meet hose-lay coverage requirements. Case No. Attachment D ZA05-091Page 1 4.Sufficient parking must be provided per individual lot unless a written agreement is properly executed and filed as outlined in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended (Sec 35.2.b).A copy of the agreement must be provided to the City prior to receiving building permits. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS * Any plan revisions or supplemental information required following a Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council hearing must be submitted to the City Planning Department no later than 5:00PM the following Monday. A minimum of twelve (12) full size copies and one (1) 11” x 17” reduction is required for any plans. If not received by the deadline, the application may be tabled until the next meeting agenda. A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans/documents and conditions of approval * is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or before acceptance of any other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be reviewed and stamped “approved” by the Planning Department. All development must comply with the City’s Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and detain all post * development run-off. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * This site falls within the applicability of the residential adjacency standards as amended by Ordinance 480- CC, Section 43, Part III “Residential Adjacency Standards” as well as the Corridor Overlay Zone regulations in Section 43, Part II. Although no review of the following issues is provided with this concept plan, the applicant must evaluate the site for compliance prior to submittal of the site plan. A Site Plan must be submitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council prior to issuance of a Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan review and that the building permit. applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements: •Masonry requirements per §43.13a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended. •Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended •Mechanical Equipment Screening •Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on all building facades) per §43.13d, Ordinance 480, as amended. •Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480, as amended. •Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.13i and §43.13j, Ordinance 480, as amended. Case No. Attachment D ZA05-091Page 2 •Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No. 480, as amended. •Screening as per §39.4, Ordinance 480, as amended. •Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544. •Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department. Case No. Attachment D ZA05-091Page 3 Surrounding Property Owners 2502 W. Southlake Blvd Stonebridge Park at Southlake Phase II OwnerZoningLandUseAcreage 1.Southlake Church of Christ CSPublic / Semi-Public8.896 2.Hallmark, Clara Maye Est SF-1ALow Density Residential 1.061 3.Brankin, James T & Andrea J SF-1ALow Density Residential 3.34 4.Cooper, Rickey A & Barbara SF-1ALow Density Residential 7.057 Smith, Ryan T & Cathy 5.Thoennes, Paul & Mary G SF-1ALow Density Residential 2.0 6.O’Leary, Patrick M SF-1ALow Density Residential 2.0 7.Bonola Family Ltd Prtnshp SF-1ALow Density Residential 2.0 White, Herbert R Case No. Attachment E ZA05-091Page 1 8.Stonebridge Monticello Pt Ltd S-P-2Office Commercial 3.173 9.Stonebridge Monticello Pt Ltd S-P-2Office Commercial 1.515 10.Stonebridge Monticello Pt Ltd S-P-2Office Commercial 2.112 11.Southlake Stonebridge Park S-P-2Office / Retail Commercial 3.696 12.Garner, Robert & Billie SF-1ALow Density Residential 3.285 13.Bedgood, James E SF-1ALow Density Residential 4.15 14.Lam, Conner AGOffice Commercial 2.64 15.White, Herbert SF-1ALow Density Residential 1.78 Bonola Family Ltd Prtnshp 16.Miller, Rheta Mae AGLow Density Residential 6.992 17.Miller, Rheta Mae AGLow Density Residential 2.715 18.Miller, Rheta Mae AGLow Density Residential 2.03 19.Miller, Rheta Mae AGLow Density Residential 0.46 Case No. Attachment E ZA05-091Page 2 Surrounding Property Owner Responses 2502 W. Southlake Blvd Stonebridge Park at Southlake Phase II Notices Sent: Sixteen (16) Responses: None (0) Case No. Attachment F ZA 05-091 Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-474 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 2E, 2F, 2F1, & 2F2, SITUATED IN THE JESSE G. ALLEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 18, BEING APPROXIMATELY 12.27 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “AG” AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO “S-P-2” GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH “C-2” LOCAL-RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES AND “O-1” OFFICE DISTRICT USES, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091 Page1 WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “AG” Agricultural District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off- street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091 Page2 improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being Tracts 2E, 2F, 2F1, & 2F2, situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, being approximately 12.27 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “AG” Agricultural District to “S-P-2” Detailed Site Plan District with “C-2” Local-Retail Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091 Page3 Commercial District uses and “O-1” Office District uses as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following specific conditions, if any: 1. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091 Page4 SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091 Page5 fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of ___________, 2006. _________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________________ CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of __________, 2006. ________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: ________________________________ CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091 Page6 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY DATE:___________________________ ADOPTED:_______________________ EFFECTIVE:______________________ Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091 Page7 EXHIBIT “A” Being Tracts 2E, 2F, 2F1, & 2F2, situated in the Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, being approximately 12.27 acres: Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091Page8 Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091Page9 EXHIBIT “B” Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091Page10 Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091Page11 Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091Page12 Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091Page13 Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091Page14 Case No. Case No. Attachment G Attachment G ZZAA05-09105-091PagePage1515 Proposed Architectural Styles Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091Page16 Proposed Lighting Styles Case No. Attachment G ZA05-091Page17