Item 7ACity of Southlake
Department of Planning
S T A F F R E P O R T
April 26, 2006
ZA05-169
CASE NO:
Zoning Change and Development Plan for Johnson Place
PROJECT:
REQUEST: Zoning change and development plan on approximately 43.42 acres from “AG”
Agricultural District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District to “R-PUD”
Residential Planned Unit Development District. The plan proposes the development
of 54 single family residential lots averaging 20,110 square feet, a gross residential
density of 1.24 dwelling unit/acre and net density of 1.50 du/ac. There is 10.38 acres
of open space (23.91% of the gross land area). Under the proposed “R-PUD”
Residential Planned Unit Development district the applicant proposes the following
uses and regulations:
This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the “SF-20A” Single Family
Residential Zoning District and the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the
following exceptions:
Lot Area: 15,000 square feet.
Front Yard: 35 feet, except lots in cul-de-sacs shall have a front yard setback of 30 feet.
Side Yard: 10 feet.
Side Yard Adjacent to a Street: 20 feet.
Lot Width: 80 feet.
Rear Lot Width: A rear lot width of 125 feet adjacent to certain lots shall not apply.
Buffer Lots: Buffer lots adjacent to certain lots shall not apply.
Curvilinear Street Design: A maximum street centerline of 1600 feet.
Sidewalks: Sidewalks on both sides of street except when “Internal Project Trail” is shown
(6 ft).
The following changes have been made from the last submittal:
Old Plan New Plan
Buffer area adjacent to Randol Mill Ave ±60 ft No change
Min building setback from Randol Mill Ave ±100 ft No change
Street stubs into adjacent properties Provided street stubs No change
into the northwest and
west boundaries
Number of Residential Lots 58 lots 54 lots
Gross Density 1.34 du/acre 1.24 du/acre
Net Density 1.61 du/acre 1.50 du/acre
Number of Common Area Lots 15 No change
Open Space 10.64 acres 10.38 acres
% of Open Space 24.50% 23.91%
Case No.
ZA05-169
1. Conduct public hearing
ACTION NEEDED:
2. Consider second reading of zoning change and development plan approval
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated April 26, 2006
(D)
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(G) Ordinance No. 480-482
(H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (748-8067)
Dennis Killough (748-8072)
Case No.
ZA05-169
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNERS: Sunnybrook Properties, Inc. and Derrell & Kitti Johnson
APPLICANT: Mady Development Corporation
PROPERTY SITUATION: 2440 Johnson Rd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts, 6B, 6D, 8, 8A, 8A2A, and 8A2B, J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No.
521; and Lot 1, Block 1, Johnson Place Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District
REQUESTED ZONING: “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District
HISTORY: -A preliminary plat was approved by City Council for the Father Joe Addition
on August 6, 1991.
-A final plat was approved by City Council for Lot 1 of Father Joe Addition
on August 6, 1991 as well.
-City Council approved a final plat for Lots 2 & 3, Father Joe Addition on
October 1, 1991.
-A change of zoning from “CS” to “SF-1A” was approved by City Council on
Lot 1, Father Joe Addition on January 6, 2004.
-A plat revision was approved by City Council on December 16, 2003 for the
Johnson Place Addition.
TRANSPORTATION
Master Thoroughfare Plan
ASSESSMENT:
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends Randol Mill Avenue, or the
future F.M. 1938 roadway expansion, to be an arterial street with 140 feet of
right-of-way and Johnson Road to be 2-lane, undivided collector with 70 feet
of right-of-way. Right-of-way will be dedicated for these roadways.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed subdivision will have one (1) street intersecting with Randol
Mill Avenue (the future F.M. 1938 roadway expansion) to the east and one
(1) street intersecting with Johnson Road to the south.
Both Randol Mill Avenue and Johnson Road are currently 2-lane, undivided
roadways. The north/south alignment of Randol Mill Avenue is planned to be
a 4-lane, divided arterial street with 140 feet of right-of-way (the future F.M.
1938 roadway expansion). The future F.M. 1938 roadway will ultimately
Case No. Attachment A
ZA05-169Page 1
provide access to State Highway 114 to the north.
May, 2005 traffic counts on Randol Mill Ave (between F.M. 1709 and
Florence Rd)
24hr 4,0654,142
North Bound (NB) () South Bound (SB) ()
NB 373349
Peak A.M. () 7 – 8 a.m. Peak P.M. () 4 – 5 p.m.
SB 350352
Peak A.M. () Peak P.M. ()
7:45 – 8:45 a.m.4:30 – 5:30 p.m.
Traffic Impact
Use # Lots Vtpd* AM-AM-PM-PM-
IN OUT IN OUT
Single-Family Residential 54 517 10 30 35 20
*Vehicle Trips Per Day
**The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel
times on Randol Mill Ave.
PATHWAYS MASTER
PLAN: The Southlake Pathways Master Plan recommends an 8-foot multi-use trail
along the creek that crosses a small part of the proposed subdivision on the
west side of the development. Additionally, the subdivision ordinance
requires minimum 4-foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the streets within
the subdivision and must provide safe connections to City trails. The
applicant is proposing a sidewalk and trail system as part of the development.
WATER & SEWER: A 6-inch water line exists along the east side of Randol Mill Avenue. A 6-
inch sanitary sewer line exists along the west side of Randol Mill Avenue.
TREE PRESERVATION: Although I have not spoken to or met with the applicant, the submitted plan
shows an excellent attempt in preserving as many quality trees as possible on a
development site.
The tree labeled “Post Oak Best Tree on Property” is actually a Blackjack
Oak with a 50’ canopy spread and is proposed to be preserved within the
round-a-bout median in the center of the right-of-way. The trees in the central
portion of the property are all Hackberry, American Elm and Mulberry, and
are in poor to fair condition. All of the trees along the two existing fence lines
that run north and south splitting the three lots are small hackberry, bois-d-
arc, cedar elm and other small native trees that have been suppressed and
deformed by the overgrowth of grapevine and greenbrier. The best “Quality
trees on the site are located within the far west portion of the property where
there are three (3) stands of mostly Post Oaks that are proposed to be
preserved in a large open space area.
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: The Johnson Place development drains in 4 directions. The eastern portion of
the site drains to two (2) proposed detention ponds – one (1) at the northeast
corner of the site adjacent to Randol Mill, and one (1) at the southeast corner
Case No. Attachment A
ZA05-169Page 2
of the development along Randol Mill. The outfall of the two ponds will be
along the roadway of Randol Mill. The western portion of the site drains also
drains to two (2) proposed detention ponds – one (1) at the southwest corner
of the site near the park which will outfall directly into the creek, and one (1)
at the southwest corner of the site closest to Johnson Road which will outfall
at Johnson Road.
SOUTHLAKE 2025: City Council approved the recommendations made by the Southlake 2025
committee for the Davis Blvd/F.M. 1938 Corridor study area to include the
following changes:
Land Use Recommendations
Existing LUP Designation - Low Density Residential. The proposed
development does not meet the criteria for LD-Residential. Definition of
LD-Residential – “detached single-family residential development at a net
density of one or fewer dwelling units per net acre”. The applicant has
submitted a letter with justifications for the proposed land use.
Environmental Resource Protection Recommendations
The Environmental Resource Protection Plan recommends the protection
and enhancement of critical environmental and natural features, including
trees and ponds.
P&Z ACTION: February 23, 2006; Approved to tabled (6-0) until March 9, 2006.
March 9, 2006; Approved (4-2) subject to the Concept Plan Review Summary
No. 3 dated March 3, 2006 and the following conditions:
1) Deleting Lot 24, Block 1;
2) Requiring a temporary turn-around and easement at the terminus of
Street F.
3) Subject to the commitments made by the developer in the letter to
Hillside Court Homeowner’s Association dated February 20, 2006.
4) And subject to the developer’s commitment to aerate the ponds.
COUNCIL ACTION: March 21, 2006; Approved to table to the April 4, 2006 meeting.
April 4, 2006; Approved first reading (5-1) noting the applicant will come
nd
back on 2 Reading with a reduction of a minimum of five lots and will
provide specific fence design standards; subject to Development Plan
Review Summary No. 3, dated March 3, 2006; and noting that while this
plan is non-compliant with our low density Land Use Plan designation, it
follows the general idea of what Council wants on this site due to the open
space, the reduction of lots, and the overall plan.
April 18, 2006; Approved to table (6-0) until May 2, 2006.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA05-169Page 3
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated April 26, 2006.
Please note that the Zoning and Development Plan as proposed is not
compliant with the City’s Master Land Use Plan’s “Low Density Residential”
Land Use Designation. A justification letter from the applicant is included as
part of Attachment ‘C’. Any motion for approval of this item should include
justification for non-compliance with the Land Use Plan.
N:\Community Development\MEMO\2005cases\05-169ZDP.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA05-169Page 4
Case No. Attachment B
ZA05-169Page 1
PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED 58-LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-169Page 1
REVISED 54-LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-169Page 2
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-169Page 3
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-169Page 4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-169Page 5
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-169Page 6
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-169Page 7
Case No. Attachment C
ZA05-169Page 8
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA05-169Four04/26/06
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Project Name: Zoning and Development Plan for Johnson Place
APPLICANT: ARCHITECT:
Mady Development Corporation Sage Group, Inc.
Phone: Phone: (972) 929-8443
Fax: Fax: (972) 929-1241
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 4/24/06, AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8069.
1.The following changes are needed regarding streets:
a.Staff recommends street stubs be centered into the boundaries of the properties to the SE
and SW.
b.Staff recommends that the street stub into the northwest boundary be shifted west to abut
the northwest corner of the development boundary. This recommendation is based on
existing tree cover, the location of the existing tract boundaries to the north and existing
improvements on the northern property.
* Please note that dedication of ROW will be required in accordance with the MTP and TXDOT
Davis/FM1938 extension plans at the time of subdivision platting.
A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans/documents and conditions of
*
approval is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or before
acceptance of any other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be reviewed
and stamped “approved” by the Planning Department.
* All development must comply with the City’s Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and detain all post
development run-off.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a construction permit a Preliminary Plat, Plat
Vacation of Johnson Place Addition, Final Plat, Construction Plans, Developer’s Agreement must be
processed and approved and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the
following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related
Permit Fees. Prior to a building permit the subdivision public improvements must be accepted by the
City and the Final Plat filed in the County Plat Records.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA05-169Page 1
Case No Review No.Dated: Number of Pages:
. 05-169 _Two_ February 17, 2006 1 ___
Project Name:
Johnson Place (Zoning Change & Development Plan)
Comments due to the Planning Department:
February 14, 2006_____
ContactPhone:Fax:
: Keith Martin (817) 748-8229__________ (817) 481-5713___________
===========================================================================
The following comments are based on the review of plans received on February 6, 2006 . Comments designated with a
number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City
Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant’s responsibility to contact the
.
department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment
===========================================================================
Are the bufferyards correctly shown and labeled?
1. Yes, a 15’ type Q bufferyard is proposed along Randol Mill Ave.
Is a tree survey required?
* Yes, a tree survey of the property was provided.
TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS:
1. Although I have not spoken to or met with the applicant, the submitted plan shows an excellent
attempt in preserving as many quality trees as possible on a development site.
The tree labeled “Post Oak Best Tree on Property” is actually a Blackjack Oak with a 50’ canopy
spread and is proposed to be preserved within the round-a-bout median in the center of the right-
of-way. The trees in the central portion of the property are all Hackberry, American Elm and
Mulberry, and are in poor to fair condition. All of the trees along the two existing fence lines that
run north and south splitting the three lots are small hackberry, bois-d-arc, cedar elm and other
small native trees that have been suppressed and deformed by the overgrowth of grapevine and
greenbrier. The best “Quality trees on the site are located within the far west portion of the
property where there are three (3) stands of mostly Post Oaks that are proposed to be preserved
in a large open space area.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA05-169Page 2
Surrounding Property Owners
Johnson Place
Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage
1.Richardson, Anna Leslie SF-1A Low Density Residential 1.0
2.Berkenbile, Stephen & Janet SF-1A Low Density Residential 1.0
3.Garrett, Ross W & Karen L SF-1A Low Density Residential 0.974
4.Ewan, John D Jr & Lynn SF-1A Low Density Residential 1.0
5.Gallagher, John & Yvette SF-1A Low Density Residential 1.034
6.Mower, Stephen C & Paula T SF-1A Low Density Residential 0.990
7.Cunningham, Robert R & Beth SF-1A Low Density Residential 1.007
8.Geist, John J & Pilar D SF-1A Low Density Residential 1.034
9.Smart, Vole W & Beverly SF-1A Low Density Residential 1.073
10.Johnson, Derrell & Kitty SF-1A Low Density Residential 1.3
11.Johnson, Derrell E SF-1A Low Density Residential 18.462
12.Smith, Edward C & Tracy R-PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344
13.Williams, Robert & Mai F R-PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344
Case No. Attachment E
ZA05-169Page 1
14.Fore, Stan & Lisa R-PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344
15.Milke, Keith E & Dina M R-PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344
16.Guy, Bradley C & Meredith A R-PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344
17.Holbert, Barbara A & Andrew R-PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344
18.Chaturvedi, Purnima & Sanjeev R-PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344
19.Rodriguez, J Hector & Rebecca R-PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344
20.Stiller, Robert A Jr & Jane R-PUD Medium Density Residential 0.344
21.Quintanilla, Jose & Ana R-PUD Medium Density Residential 0.343
22.Lee, Jae Y & J Lee R-PUD Medium Density Residential 0.442
23.Purvis, Willis N & Avis SF-1A Low Density Residential 1.747
24.Bishop, Paul H SF-1A Low Density Residential 1.315
25.McFadden, John L SF-1A Low Density Residential 1.377
26.Bryant, Kreg & Tambra SF-1A Low Density Residential 0.659
27.Weinstein, R A & Michelle SF-20A Low Density Residential 1.209
28.Trailhead HOA SF-20A Medium Density Residential 2.735
29.Dickerson, Donald F SF-20A Medium Density Residential 0.577
30.Denkeler, Michael L SF-20A Medium Density Residential 0.459
31.White, Paul E & Janice D SF-20A Medium Density Residential 0.478
32.Thompson, Herlinda SF-20A Medium Density Residential 0.463
33.Ott, Rick A & Debra SF-20A Medium Density Residential 0.463
34.McDuff, Frank M Jr & M C SF-20A Medium Density Residential 0.460
35.Beaudry, Bart & Elizabeth SF-20A Medium Density Residential 0.554
36.Adelaar, Glenn & Rowena A SF-20A Medium Density Residential 0.545
37.Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Ent Inc R-PUD Low Density Residential 2.0
38.Rowsey, Bryan M & Christy AG Low Density Residential 0.682
39.Potysman, Mary Noble AG Low Density Residential 4.508
40.Thorne, Kenneth L & Rebecca AG Low Density Residential 10.0
41.Johnson, G K AG Low Density Residential 1.67
42.Johnson, D E AG Low Density Residential 0.50
43.Johnson, G K AG Low Density Residential 1.0
44.Johnson, D E AG Low Density Residential 2.9
45.Sunnybrook Properties, Inc AG Low Density Residential 11.1
46.Sunnybrook Properties, Inc AG Low Density Residential 2.7
47.Johnson, G K AG Low Density Residential 0.597
48.Johnson, D E AG Low Density Residential 0.06
49.Johnson, Derrell E AG Low Density Residential 7.3
50.Zamores, Francisco S AG Low Density Residential 2.0
51.Warner, Jesse & Sue AG Low Density Residential 2.25
52.Hookstratten, Joanna AG Low Density Residential 1.1
53.Tarrant County AG Low Density Residential 2.292
54.Hookstratten, Joanna AG Low Density Residential 0.88
55.Hookstratten, Joanna AG Low Density Residential 0.791
Case No. Attachment E
ZA05-169Page 2
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Johnson Place
Notices Sent: Forty-Seven (47)
Responses Received: Two (2)
Name Address Received
Dave Ewan 2305 Hillside Ct. March 9, 2006
Joanna Hookstratten 2360 Johnson Rd March 22, 2006
Case No. Attachment F
ZA05-169Page 1
Case No. Attachment F
ZA05-169Page 2
Case No. Attachment F
ZA05-169Page 3
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-482
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR
TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS, 6B, 6D, 8, 8A, 8A2A, AND 8A2B,
SITUATED IN THE J.J. FRESHOUR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 521 AND LOT 1,
BLOCK 1, JOHNSON PLACE ADDITION, BEING APPROXIMATELY 43.40
ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT
“A” FROM “AG” AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND “SF-1A” SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO “R-PUD” RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH “SF-20A” SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT USES AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN,
INCLUDING “PUD” DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, ATTACHED HERETO
AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER
PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE
PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE
ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS,
the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the
electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local
Government Code; and,
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to
adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures
and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the
purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a
comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS,
the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “AG” Agricultural District and
Case No. Attachment G
ZA06-169 Page 1
“SF-1A” Single Family Residential District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS,
a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or
corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City
Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be
granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately
surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the
vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,
lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and
adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in
the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-
street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and
protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health
ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
facilities; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things
the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value
of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity
for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,
and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property
with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and,
Case No. Attachment G
ZA06-169 Page 2
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning
lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health
and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue
concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,
parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity
and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the
conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a
change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes
in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of
the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and
welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed
on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the
permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described
below:
Being Tracts 6B, 6D, 8, 8A, 8A2A, and 8A2B, situated in the J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract
No. 521 and Lot 1, Block 1, Johnson Place Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, as
recorded in Cabinet ‘A’, Slide 8948, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately
43.40 acres, and more fully and completely described in exhibit “A” from “AG” Agricultural
District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District to “RPUD” Residential Planned Unit
Development District with “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District uses as depicted on the
approved Development Plan, including “RPUD” development standards, attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following specific conditions:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA06-169 Page 3
1.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,
Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to
all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent
ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words,
phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby
ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the
comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the
community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably
anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and
air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the
adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial
needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with
reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use
of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas,
Case No. Attachment G
ZA06-169 Page 4
affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances
where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity
of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,
the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or
who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a
separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the
provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at
the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,
both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by
this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its
caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least
fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition
of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall
additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of
Case No. Attachment G
ZA06-169 Page 5
this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by
law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the ____ day of ________, 2006.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the ____ day of _________, 2006.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA06-169 Page 6
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment G
ZA06-169 Page 7
EXHIBIT “A”
Being Tracts 6B, 6D, 8, 8A, 8A2A, and 8A2B, situated in the J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521 and Lot
1, Block 1, Johnson Place Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, as recorded in Cabinet ‘A’, Slide
8948, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 43.40 acres:
**insert M&B**
Case No. Attachment G
ZA06-169 Page 8
EXHIBIT “B”
Case No. Attachment G
ZA06-169 Page 9
Case No. Attachment G
ZA06-169 Page 10