Item 7BCity of Southlake
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
November 14, 2007
ZA07-106
CASE NO:
Zoning Change and Concept Plan/Site Plan for Kimball Lake Office Park
PROJECT:
REQUEST: On behalf of Vision Southlake Development, LLC, Sage Group, Inc. is requesting
approval of a change of zoning and concept plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “S-
P-2” Generalized Site Plan District with “O-1” Office District, “O-2” Office District,
and limited “C-2” Local Retail Commercial District uses to include a ‘hotel’ use by
Specific Use Permit on Parcel D. The plan proposes the development of an office park
with limited retail uses on twelve (12) lots totaling approximately 14.45 acres.
Under the “S-P-2” zoning, the applicant proposes the following permitted uses and
development regulations:
Phase 1, Parcel B, Parcel C, and Parcel E shall be limited to the permitted uses and
development regulations of the “O-1” Office District
Parcel A shall be limited to the permitted uses and development regulations of the
“C-2” Local Retail Commercial District with the following uses being deleted:
Cleaning, dying, and pressing works;
o
Laundry and laundromats;
o
Duplicating service, printing, lithographing, mimeographing, multi-graphing
o
and offset printing;
Tires, batteries and automobile accessory sales
o
Parcel D shall be limited to the permitted uses and development regulations of the
“O-2” Office District to include the “HC” Hotel District uses of a ‘hotel’ with the
following specific regulations:
Motels shall not be allowed;
o
Hotels shall be of a “full-service” type only, having:
o
a minimum area of 300 sq. ft. per guestroom;
(a) a full service restaurant with full kitchen facilities providing
service to the general public; or (b) a kitchen on the premises in
which meals are prepared by the management; or (c) a
concessionaire of the management for room service delivery;
on site staff required seven (7) days a week, twenty-four (24) hours
per day;
a minimum of one thousand (1,000) square feet of meeting or
conference room(s)
A Specific Use Permit shall be required.
o
The side setback shall be ten (10) feet between all internal lot lines only
Case No.
ZA 07-106
The shall be no bufferyard requirements along interior lot lines
The maximum impervious coverage for the overall “S-P-2” boundary shall be 65%;
however, the maximum impervious coverage requirment shall not apply to
individual lots within the boundary
Required parking for all built uses shall be provided within the “S-P-2” boundary;
parking requirements for individual lots shall not apply
Buildings within Parcel E shall be limited to one story in height
The following variances are being requested:
Driveway stacking – The minimum driveway stacking depth required is 75 feet.
The applicant is requesting stacking depths of 15 feet and 32 feet. (Driveway Ord.
No. 634, Section 5.2.d)
Driveway spacing – The minimum driveway spacing required is 250 feet between
driveway centerlines. The applicant is requesting a distance of 224 feet to the off-
site driveway to the south and a distance of 107 feet to the nearest driveway to the
north. (Driveway Ord. No. 634, Section 5.1)
Street frontage - All lots must have frontage on a street. The applicant is
requesting a waiver from this regulation for four (4) lots. (Subdivision Ord. No.
483, Section 8.01.A)
Consider first reading for a zoning change and concept plan
ACTION NEEDED:
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated November 2, 2007
(D)
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(F)Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(G)SPIN Meeting Summary Report
(H)Ordinance No. 480-537
(I)Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (748-8067)
Ben Bryner (748-8602)
Case No.
ZA 07-106
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Vision Southlake Development, LLC
APPLICANT: Sage Group, Inc.
PROPERTY SITUATION: 600 N. Kimball Avenue
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 3B, situated in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use with the ECR–Employment Center Residential optional designation
CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District
REQUESTED ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District
HISTORY: There is no development history on this property. A home currently exists on
the northern portion of the property.
TRANSPORTATION
Master Thoroughfare Plan
ASSESSMENT:
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends N. Kimball Avenue to be a 4-lane,
divided arterial street with 88 feet of right-of-way. The Master Thoroughfare
Plan recommends the future Kirkwood Boulevard extension to be a 4-lane,
divided arterial street with 100 feet of right-of-way. Right-of-way is shown on
the plan and will be dedicated as part of the platting process.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed development is proposing two (2) driveways onto N. Kimball
Avenue and three (3) driveways onto the future Kirkwood Boulevard
extension. All proposed lots are connected through proposed common access
easements.
North Kimball Avenue is currently a 2-lane, undivided roadway. Plans for
widening this section of N. Kimball Avenue have been approved and
construction should begin soon.
May 2006 traffic counts on N. Kimball Ave (between SH 114 and
Highland St)
24hr 5,2904,781
North Bound (NB) () South Bound (SB) ()
NB 298551
Peak A.M. () Peak P.M. ()
11:15—12:15AM6:00—7:00PM
SB 468346
Peak A.M. () Peak P.M. ()
7:30 – 8:30 AM
3:30 – 4:30 PM
Case No. Attachment A
ZA 07-106 Page 1
Traffic Impact
Use Acres Vtpd* AM-AM-PM-PM-
IN OUT IN OUT
Office Park 14.45 2,819 341 30 61 347
*Vehicle Trips Per Day
**The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times
on N. Kimball Avenue.
PATHWAYS
MASTER PLAN: The Pathways Master Plan recommends an 8-foot multi-use trail along the west
side of N. Kimball Avenue. The trail is shown on the plan. Sidewalks (5 foot
minimum) will be required along all other street frontages.
WATER & SEWER: A 12-inch water line exists along the east side of N. Kimball Avenue. A 12-
inch sanitary sewer line exists along the west side of N. Kimball Avenue.
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: This site will drain to a temporary detention pond until such time as the
Gateway Church project is completed. The developers of these projects have
an agreement stipulating that the Gateway Church project drainage facilities will
account for drainage from the Kimball Lake Office Park site. The proposed
temporary detention pond will detain storm water and release it into North
Kimball Avenue until the Gateway Church facilities are constructed.
TREE PRESERVATION: The submitted Tree Conservation Plan does not break down the amount of
existing tree canopy to be preserved and the percentage to be removed. Instead,
information is provided on the percentage of existing trees that are proposed to
be preserved and percentage proposed to be removed. Across the entire site
75.81 % of the existing trees are proposed to be preserved. In Phase 1 of the
development all of the existing trees are proposed to be removed.
Consolidated Land Use Plan Recommendations
SOUTHLAKE 2025:
The underlying designation is Mixed Use and the optional designation is
Employment Center Residential. Office uses are consistent with the Mixed Use
designation.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan/Southlake Pathways Plan
Recommendations
A 6 foot sidewalk is required along Kimball Avenue per the Southlake
Pathways Plan. The applicant is proposing an 8 foot trail along Kimball
Avenue.
P&Z ACTION: November 8, 2007; Approved (7-0) Phase I only which specifically excludes
parcels A through E; approving variances for driveway spacing; addressing
stacking by removing 2 to 3 spots on the north side; relocating the handicapped
parking spot to the south driveway; adding landscape island to the southeast
Case No. Attachment A
ZA 07-106 Page 2
parking row; limiting phase one to 65% impervious coverage; granting street
frontage variance; and, subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated
November 2, 2007.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated November 2, 2007.
N:\Community Development\MEMO\2007cases\07-106ZCP.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA 07-106 Page 3
Case No. Attachment B
ZA 07-106 Page 1
Narrative Letter
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 2
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 3
“S-P-2” Letter
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 5
Variance Letter
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 6
Concept Plan / Site Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 7
Variance Exhibit
Driveway Spacing:
Driveway Spacing:
Req’d = 250 ft
Req’d = 250 ft
Prov. = 107 ft
Prov. = 224 ft
Driveway Stacking:
Driveway Stacking:
Req’d = 75 ft
Req’d = 75 ft
Prov. = 32 ft
Prov. = 15 ft
*Requesting variance to regulation that all
Lots have street frontage for four (4) lots.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 8
Color Building Rendering
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 9
Architectural Elevations (Buildings A & C)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 10
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 11
Architectural Elevations (Buildings B & D)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 12
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 13
Architectural Elevations (Buildings E & F)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 14
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 15
Fencing / Screening Exhibit
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 16
Sign Exhibit
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 17
Tree Conservation Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 18
Landscape Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 07-106 Page 19
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA07-106Three11/02/07
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Site Plan
Project Name: - Kimball Lake Office Park
OWNER: Vision Southlake Dev., LLC APPLICANT: Sage Group, Inc.
Steven Paulsen Curtis Young
1500 E. Southlake Blvd, Suite 200 1130 N. Carroll Ave, Suite 200
Southlake, TX 76092 Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 822-1470 Phone: (817) 424-2626
Fax: (817) 424-2890 Fax: (817) 424-2890
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/22/07 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072 OR BEN BRYNER AT (817) 748-
8602.
1.Label the building lines (front, rear & side) with the distance from the property line, i.e. 30’ front
building line.
2.The following changes are needed with regard to ingress/egress to the site:
(A variance has
a.Provide the minimum stacking depth of 75 feet from the connecting R.O.W.
been requested.)
b.Provide the minimum spacing of 250 feet from the centerline of the proposed north driveway to
the centerline of the next driveway off-site to the north and from the centerline of the proposed
(A variance has
south driveway to the centerline of the next driveway off-site to the south.
been requested.)
(A variance has been requested.)
3.All lots must have frontage on a street.
* The parking provided for the site (120 spaces) provides for no medical office in the development. This
is based on 8 spaces for the 1st 1,000 sq. ft. and 1 space per 300 sq. ft. on the additional building
area for 100% general office. Medical office is 1 space per 150 sq. ft. on the additional building
area.
* Prior to receiving a building permit, a copy of the filed shared parking, cross-access, and shared
maintenance agreement must be received by the City. The maintenance agreement should include
provisions for fire lanes and trash enclosure/use.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS
Case No. Attachment D
ZA 07-106 Page 1
* All development must comply with the City’s Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and detain all post
development run-off.
* A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans/documents and conditions of
approval is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or before
acceptance of any other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be reviewed
and stamped “approved” by the Planning Department.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior
to construction of any signs.
65
* It appears that this property lies within the LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning
Ordinance No. 479.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and
filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and
building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but
not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap
Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Public Works – Engineering
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. The preliminary drainage plan refers to the drainage plan prepared for the Kirkwood Road extension
project. These tracts do appear on the preliminary drainage plans for the Kirkwood project, however
the Kirkwood drainage plan does not include drainage coefficients for these tracts consistent with the
type of development being proposed (i.e., office / commercial). The applicant has agreed to coordinate
drainage plans with the Gateway Church project
2. The preliminary grading plan shows a temporary detention facility and makes reference to future
drainage improvements that will serve this development and will be constructed with the Gateway
Church project. The applicant has agreed to provide a written agreement with gateway Church that
acknowledges this arrangement. At this time, the agreement has not been provided to this office.
* This property drains into Critical Drainage Structures 14 and 15 and requires a fee to be paid prior
to beginning construction. ($220.80 / Acre for structure 14 and $406.50 / Acre for structure 15).
* The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and
meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit civil construction plans (22” X 34” full size sheets) and a completed Construction Plan
Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. The plans shall
conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which
are located on the City’s website.
* A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082
to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA 07-106 Page 2
* A Developer’s Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be approved by Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836.
* This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of
construction plans.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Landscape Administrator
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. The submitted Tree Conservation Plan does not break down the amount of existing tree canopy to be
preserved and the percentage to be removed. Instead, information is provided on the percentage of
existing trees that are proposed to be preserved and percentage proposed to be removed. Across the
entire site 75.81 % of the existing trees are proposed to be preserved. In Phase 1 of the development all
of the existing trees are proposed to be removed.
2. A Tree Preservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve
existing tree canopy cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0 in
Ordinance 585-C.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire Minimum percentage of the existing tree
site cover to be preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as
approved by City Council.
Please provide on the Tree Conservation Plan information regarding the total percentage of tree canopy
cover on the entire site and the proposed percentage of existing tree canopy cover that will be
preserved after total build-out of the development.
LANDSCAPING:
1. On page 2 of the Phase 1 Site Plan & Pedestrian Access Plan, it states that both the proposed
bufferyard plant material and interior landscape plant material will meet or exceed the minimum amount
of plant material required to be provided. The proposed landscaping as shown on the submitted
Landscape Plan does not meet or exceed the minimum amount of landscape plant material required to
meet the interior landscape and proposed bufferyard requirements for Phase 1 of the development.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA 07-106 Page 3
Please provide at least the minimum required amount of plant material required to be provided for the
development.
LANDSCAPE SUMMARY CHARTS:
1. Please breakdown the bufferyards within the Bufferyards Summary Chart by their location on the
proposed lots. North, South, East, West. It is alright to provide bufferyard calculations for the entire
Length of North Kimball Road but if the construction of the development will be phased than the
calculations for each lot bufferyard will need to be separate.
Southlake 2025 Comprehensive Plan
Consolidated Land Use Plan Recommendations
The underlying designation is Mixed Use and the optional designation is Employment Center Residential.
Office uses are consistent with the Mixed Use designation.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan/Southlake Pathways Plan Recommendations
A 6 foot sidewalk is required along Kimball Avenue per the Southlake Pathways Plan. The applicant is
proposing an 8 foot trail along Kimball Avenue.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA 07-106 Page 4
Surrounding Property Owners
Kimball Lake Office Park
SPO MAP
SPO # Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage
Mixed Use
1.
Kimball Road Lp I1 1.61
Medium Density Residential
2.
Martin Custom Homes Llc SF20A 1.085
Public / Semi-Public
3.
Txu Electric Delivery Co CS 2.547
Mixed Use
4.
Halim, Emil A MF1 0.959
Mixed Use
5.
Harris, Kimberly Susan SF1-A 0.951
Mixed Use
6.
Ekstrom, Delton E SF1-A 1.052
Mixed Use
7.
Coty, Rita SF1-A 0.911
Public / Semi-Public
8.
St Laurence Episcopal Church CS 5.354
Medium Density Residential
9.
Hillman, Luther L AG 3.94
Medium Density Residential
10.
579 Kimball Llc AG 8.105
Medium Density Residential
11.
Episcopal Diocese Of Ft Worth AG 1.026
Mixed Use
12.
Gateway Church NRPUD 8.593
Mixed Use
13.
Gateway Church NRPUD 6.614
Mixed Use
14.
Gateway Church NRPUD 48.972
Mixed Use
15.
Nci Building Systems I1 15.777
Mixed Use
16.
Vision Southlake Dev Llc AG 14.82
Case No. Attachment E
ZA 07-106 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Kimball Lake Office Park
Notices Sent: Sixteen (16)
Responses Receive: One (1)
Kimberly Harris (SPO #5),
700 Cherry Ct., submitted a Notification Response Form in
Opposition
on November 6, 2007 (see attached).
Case No. Attachment F
ZA 07-106 Page 1
Case No. Attachment F
ZA 07-106 Page 2
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO. ZA07-106
PROJECT NAME: Kimball Lake Office Park
SPIN DISTRICT: 6
MEETING DATE: September 10, 2007 – 6:30PM
MEETING LOCATION: 1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MEETING ROOMS 3A & 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Six (6)
SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: None
APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Curtis Young (Sage Group) and David Keener
STAFF PRESENT: Planner Clayton Comstock
STAFF CONTACT: Clayton Comstock, (817)748-8269; ccomstock@ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Two residents attended the SPIN 6 meeting for the
proposed Kimball Lake Office Park on the west side
of N. Kimball Avenue between E. Highland Street
and SH 114. The 3.5-acre property is adjacent to
the recently approved Gateway Church project on
SH 114 and across Kimball from the recently approved Estancia residential subdivision. The S-P-1 zoning and
site plan proposal is for six single-story, Tuscan-style office buildings with a shared courtyard for each pair of
buildings. None in attendance verbalized any major objections to the development.
Since this SPIN meeting was held, the scope of this project has increased from a 3.5-acre S-P-1 zoning request
for an office development to a 14.45-acre S-P-2 zoning request with a mix of proposed uses. See full Staff
Report for updated information.
QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION
QUESTION: You mentioned this project will be built in phases; which buildings will be built first?
RESPONSE: The southernmost two buildings and the southern building of the western pair will be built
first.
QUESTION: What uses are proposed?
RESPONSE: Professional offices.
QUESTION: Will the building style be similar to the professional offices on the west side of Carroll Ave
between Southlake Blvd and SH 114?
Case No. Attachment G
ZA 07-106 Page 1
What is the timing of this development in relation to the widening of N. Kimball Avenue
QUESTION:
and the development of Estancia, Gateway Church, and public improvements related to
those developments?
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither
verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues
and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as
guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission
and final action by City Council.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA 07-106 Page 2
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-537
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 3B,
SITUATED IN THE T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1049,
BEING APPROXIMATELY 14.45 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “AG”
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO “S-P-2” GENERALIZED SITE PLAN
DISTRICT WITH “O-1” OFFICE DISTRICT USES, LIMITED “C-2”
LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES, LIMITED “O-2”
OFFICE DISTRICT USES, AND LIMITED “HC” HOTEL DISTRICT
USES, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED
HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”,
SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN
THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP;
PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS,
the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the
electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local
Government Code; and,
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to
adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures
and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the
purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a
comprehensive plan; and
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 1
WHEREAS,
the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “AG” Agricultural District under
the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS,
a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or
corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City
Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be
granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately
surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the
vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,
lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and
adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in
the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-
street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and
protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health
ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
facilities; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things
the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value
of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity
for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,
and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 2
with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning
lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health
and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue
concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,
parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity
and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the
conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a
change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes
in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of
the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and
welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed
on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the
permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described
below:
Being Tract 3B, situated in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, and being approximately
14.45 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “AG” Agricultural
District to “S-P-2” Detailed Site Plan District with “O-1” Office District uses, limited “C-2”
Local Retail Commercial District uses, limited “O-2” Office District uses, and limited “HC”
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 3
Hotel District uses, as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated
herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following specific conditions:
1.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,
Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to
all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent
ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words,
phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby
ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the
comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the
community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably
anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and
air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the
adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial
needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with
reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use
of land throughout the community.
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 4
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting
zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions
of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity
of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,
the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or
who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a
separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the
provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at
the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,
both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by
this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its
caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least
fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 5
of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall
additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of
this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by
law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of ___________, 2007.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of __________, 2007.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 6
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 7
EXHIBIT “A”
Being Tract 3B, situated in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, and being approximately 14.45 acres.
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 8
EXHIBIT “B”
Narrative Letter
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 9
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 10
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 11
“S-P-2” Letter
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 12
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 13
Variance Letter
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 14
Concept Plan / Site Plan
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 15
Variance Exhibit
Driveway Spacing:
Driveway Spacing:
Req’d = 250 ft
Req’d = 250 ft
Prov. = 107 ft
Prov. = 224 ft
Driveway Stacking:
Driveway Stacking:
Req’d = 75 ft
Req’d = 75 ft
Prov. = 32 ft
Prov. = 15 ft
*Requesting variance to regulation that all
Lots have street frontage for four (4) lots.
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 16
Color Building Rendering
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 17
Architectural Elevations (Buildings A & C)
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 18
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 19
Architectural Elevations (Buildings B & D)
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 20
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 21
Architectural Elevations (Buildings E & F)
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 22
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 23
Fencing / Screening Exhibit
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 24
Sign Exhibit
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 25
Tree Conservation Plan
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 26
Landscape Plan
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-106 Page 27