Item 9BCity of Southlake
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
July 11, 2007
ZA07-029 & ZA07-033
CASE NO:
Preliminary Plat & Plat Revision for Autumn Creek
PROJECT:
REQUEST: Riordan Capital Properties is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and plat revision
for Autumn Creek. The property currently has "SF-1A" Single Family Residential
District zoning and consists of three (3) lots on approximately 8.67 acres. The plan
proposes to subdivide the three (3) lots into a total of seven (7) lots and providing a
street and extension of water and sanitary sewer utilities to the proposed lots. Because
the proposal includes extension of a street, more than four lots, and is currently platted,
both a Preliminary Plat and a Plat Revision are required. No variances are being
requested.
Consider preliminary plat and plat revision approval
ACTION NEEDED:
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
Plat Review Summary No. 4, dated June 29, 2007
(D)
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(G) SPIN Meeting Summary Report
(H) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (748-8067)
Ben Bryner (748-8602)
Case No.
ZA07-029
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/APPLICANT: Riordan Capital Properties
PROPERTY SITUATION: 321, 331, and 333 W. Highland Street
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 5R1-5R3, Block 1, T.M. Hood, No. 706 Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District
HISTORY: -A zoning change to “SF-1A” single family residential district and a single lot
plat were approved in February of 1995.
-A plat revision was approved by City Council for 3 lots on August 2, 2005.
TRANSPORTATION
Master Thoroughfare Plan
ASSESSMENT:
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends W. Highland Street to be a 2-lane,
undivided collector street with 70 feet of right-of-way. Adequate right-of-way
is shown to be dedicated on the plan.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The plan proposes a street that will intersect with W. Highland Street. All lots
will access the proposed street.
West Highland Street is currently a 2-lane, undivided roadway.
May, 2006 traffic counts on W. Highland St (between White Chapel &
Shady Oaks)
24hr 1,5351,639
West Bound (WB) () East Bound (EB) ()
WB 197195
Peak A.M. () Peak P.M. ()
2:45 – 3:45 p.m.
7:30 – 8:30 a.m.
EB 293185
Peak A.M. () Peak P.M. ()
7:30 – 8:30 p.m.4:45 – 5:45 p.m.
Traffic Impact
Use # Lots Vtpd* AM-AM-PM-PM-
IN OUT IN OUT
Single Family 7 67 1 4 5 3
Detached
*Vehicle Trips Per Day
**The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the peak travel times
on W. Highland Street.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA07-029 Page 1
PATHWAYS
MASTER PLAN: The Pathways Master Plan does not make any recommendations adjacent to
this development. The plan shows sidewalks being provided along all street
frontages.
WATER & SEWER: Water service is to be provided by an existing 6” waterline on the south side of
Highland Street. The closest sanitary sewer exists on the east side of N. White
Chapel Boulevard. The applicant is proposing to extend sanitary sewer to the
development.
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: The lots within the subdivision will drain to the street to the proposed detention
areas along West Highland.
TREE PRESERVATION: The applicant submitted a Tree Conservation Plan which shows the existing
trees to be removed in Red, trees to remain in Black, and trees likely to be
removed or marginal in Green. Most of the existing trees that are within the
proposed drainage easement adjacent to West Highland Avenue are shown as
"likely to be removed". It is assumed that the trees will be removed to
construct the detention/retention areas within the drainage easement. The
majority of the trees within the drainage easement are Eastern Red Cedars.
Consolidated Land Use Plan Recommendations
SOUTHLAKE 2025:
The underlying land use designation is Low Density Residential and the optional
designation is Rural Conservation. The proposed development is consistent
with the underlying designation.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations
A 4 ft. (minimum) sidewalk is required along West Highland Street and along
both sides of the new proposed street. The required sidewalks are shown on
the Pedestrian Access Plan.
P&Z ACTION: July 5, 2007; Approved ZA07-029 and ZA07-033 (5-0) subject to Plat Review
Summary No. 4, dated June 29, 2007.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 4, dated June 29, 2007.
N:\Community Development\MEMO\2007cases\07-029PP.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA07-029 Page 2
Case No. Attachment B
ZA07-029 Page 1
Preliminary Plat / Plat Revision
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-029 Page 1
Pedestrian Access Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-029 Page 2
Tree Conservation Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-029 Page 3
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA07-029 & ZA07-033Four06/29/07
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Preliminary Plat & Plat Revision- Lots 5R1R, 5R2R, 5R3R, 5R4 - 5R7, Block 1,
Project Name:
Highland Manors
APPLICANT: Triple Crown Custom Homes ENGINEER: Hamilton Duffy, P.C.
Scott Leavelle Keith Hamilton
1200 Noble Way 601 Harwood Rd
Flower Mound, TX Hurst, TX 76054
Phone: (214) 636-0652 Phone: (817) 268-0408
Fax: Fax: (817) 284-8408
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/18/07 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT BEN BRYNER AT (817) 748-8602.
1)Provide the name & address for all record owners. Is there a separate owner for the proposed Lot
5R4?
2)The following changes are needed with regard to the legal description:
a)Provide the owner(s) name(s) in the preamble. A deed reference was provided without the
owner's name.
b)Provide the graphic label for call #1. Verify that the discrepancy between the legal description
and the graphic label for the distance in call number 1 has been corrected.
3)The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties within 200' to include properties
across any adjacent R.O.W.:
a)Show all existing tracts adjacent to the site and label the name of the record owner &
corresponding deed record for all un-platted tracts within 200 feet of this property. A few
tracks have not been shown.
b)Show and label the existing easements for all platted properties within 200 feet of this property.
4)Provide easements for water, sewer and/or drainage in compliance with approved construction plans.
5)The plat revision must comply with all submittal requirements found in Section 3.03 of the City's
Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS
Case No. Attachment D
ZA07-029 Page 1
* A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans/documents and conditions of
approval is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or before
acceptance of any other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be reviewed
and stamped “approved” by the Planning Department.
All development must comply with the City’s Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and detain all post
*
development run-off.
* Although there are a few lot lines which are not perpendicular or radial, they appear to meet the intent
of this requirement.
* We recommend this plat not be filed until the construction plans have been substantially approved.
This will ensure adequate easements and finish floor elevations. Minimum finish floor elevations may
be required.
* A Developer's Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The Developer's
Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication requirements and fees,
off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and impact fees.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA07-029 Page 2
Case No. ZA07-033 Review No. 2 Dated: 6/29/07 Number of Pages: 2
Project Name: Highland Manors -- Plat Revision
Contact: Cheryl Taylor, Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8100 Fax: (817) 748-8077
Email: ctaylor@ci.southlake.tx.us
The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 6/26/2007. It is the applicant’s
responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment.
GENERAL COMMENTS:
* Easements shall be 15’ minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’
easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement.
* Consider relocating proposed fire hydrants to the property line to avoid conflicting with propose drives.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
* Any changes to the size, shape, and/or location of the proposed pond(s) may require a revision to the
concept/site/development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission
and the City Council.
* This property drains into Critical Drainage Structure #9 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning
construction ($278.14/acre).
* The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and
meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit civil construction plans (22” X 34” full size sheets) directly to the Public Works Administration
Department for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general notes which are located on the City’s website.
* A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082
to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer’s Agreement will be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City
Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must
be approved by Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for
consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836.
* This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of
construction plans.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA07-029 Page 3
Surrounding Property Owners
Autumn Creek
SPO #
Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage
Low Density Residential
1.
Riorden Capital Properties SF1-A 3.424
Low Density Residential
2.
Hubbard, Bill Mark SF1-A 3.114
Low Density Residential
3.
Riorden Capital Properties SF1-A 2.228
Low Density Residential
4.
Skaggs, Merton M Jr Etux Susan SF1-B 1.633
Low Density Residential
5.
Burch, William Etux Mindie SF1-B 2.549
Low Density Residential
6.
Davis, Stephen Etux Kathleen SF1-B 2.242
Public/Semi-Public
7.
Carroll ISD NRPUD 45.379
Public/Semi-Public
8.
Carroll ISD NRPUD 2.794
Low Density Residential
9.
Yetman, Bert M Etux Helga B AG 0.694
Low Density Residential
10.
Campbell, Jose AG 2.771
Low Density Residential
11.
Yetman, Bert M Etux Helga B AG 1.303
Low Density Residential
12.
Yetman, Bert M Etux Helga B AG 0.716
Low Density Residential
13.
Shiner, Timothy AG 1.557
Low Density Residential
14.
Dunn, Nina Louise AG 0.463
Low Density Residential
15.
Paty, Barbara Ann C1 0.988
Low Density Residential
16.
Dunn, Nina Louise AG 1.057
Low Density Residential
17.
Paty, Barbara Ann AG 2.049
Low Density Residential
18.
Mangini, Cynthia A AG 1.318
Low Density Residential
19.
Wood, James C Jr AG 0.961
Low Density Residential
20.
Wood, James C AG 1.519
Low Density Residential
21.
Woolley, Marquerite E AG 4.281
Case No. Attachment E
ZA07-033 Page 1
Low Density Residential
22.
Fechtel, Marguerite E AG 2.045
Case No. Attachment E
ZA07-033 Page 2
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Autumn Creek
Notices Sent: Twenty-two (22).
Responses Receive: One (1).
Barbara Ann Paty (SPO #15),
1000 N White Chapel Blvd., submitted a Notification Response
Favor
Form in on July 3, 2007 (see attached).
Case No. Attachment F
ZA07-029 Page 1
Case No. Attachment F
ZA07-029 Page 2
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO.
ZA07-029
PROJECT NAME:
Autumn Creek
SPIN DISTRICT:
10
MEETING DATE:
Monday, June 25, 2007 at 7:30PM
MEETING LOCATION:
1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MEETING ROOMS 3C & 3D
TOTAL ATTENDANCE:
Nine (9)
SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT:
Vic Awtry
APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING:
Scott Leavelle
STAFF PRESENT:
Planner Clayton Comstock
STAFF CONTACT:
Clayton Comstock, (817)748-8269; ccomstock@ci.southlake.tx.us
APPLICANT PRESENTATION SUMMARY
Property Situation
331 W. Highland Street
10 acres on the southside of W. Highland Street between Shady Oaks Dr. and N. White Chapel
Blvd.
Development Details
No zoning change is being requested. The property is already zoned SF-1A. The proposed
plat will subdivide the property into 7 lots of greater than 1-acre.
Sewer will be brought 800 feet from N. White Chapel Blvd to service these lots
QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION
Will [Scott Leavelle] be the builder as well as the developer?
QUESTION:
RESPONSE: Yes, Triple Crown Custom Homes will be responsible for both phases of development. One lot is
already sold and two more parties are very interested.
Will there be walls along Highland? Will there be screening walls/fences along the perimeter of
QUESTION:
the development?
RESPONSE: It is not likely that there will be walls along Highland Street, as the detention/retention ponds and
setbacks will allow the homes to be built about 100-feet away from the roadway. Walls are not
planned around the perimeter of the development. If anything, wrought iron fences and vegetation
will be the primary form of screening.
Which direction does the property drain? Is there any drainage along the eastern property
QUESTION:
boundary? How will drainage be handled?
RESPONSE: The development will drain into itself and north into two detention areas at the front of the
development along W. Highland Street. One of those two areas may be a wet retention pond.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-029 Page 1
What are the approximate prices of the lots?
QUESTION:
RESPONSE: $325,000 to $350,000.
What will you do with the large oak tree on the east side that has the old barbed wire fence
QUESTION:
running through it?
RESPONSE: If it is right on the property line, it will remain. It is the developer’s intent to keep as many trees as
possible.
SPIN REPRESENTATIVE NOTES
1.What kind of fencing will be done on Highland?
2.How much vegetation along Highland?
3.Is the developer also the only builder?
4.Where does the drainage go? Does it go to White’s Chapel?
5.Will there be septic systems?
6.How will the sewer system tie in and where?
7.Are you going to change the look and feel of Highland?
8.What are the Deed Restrictions?
9.What about the huge Oak tree on the west side that straddles the fence line and actually has the old
fence running through it?
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither
verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues
and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as
guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission
and final action by City Council.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-029 Page 2