Item 6ACity of Southlake
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
May 30, 2007
ZA07-015
CASE NO:
Zoning Change and Site Plan for White Chapel Office Park, Phase II
PROJECT:
REQUEST: On behalf of Wayne Lee & Associates, Cheatham & Associates is requesting approval
of a zoning change and site plan from “O-1” Office District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site
Plan District with “O-1” Office District uses and regulations. The plan proposes the
development of five (5) two-story office buildings totaling 28,500 square feet. Each
building is approximately 5,700 square feet in floor area and is proposed to be on a
separate lot.
The proposed “S-P-1” zoning shall follow the “O-1” office district uses and regulations
with the following exceptions:
Side Yard - There shall be a side yard of not less than ten (10) feet.
Maximum Impervious Coverage - The maximum impervious coverage shall not
exceed sixty (60%) percent of the total “S-P-1” zoning district boundary.
Bufferyards - Bufferyards along interior lot lines shall not be required.
Parking – shall allow up to a 20% reduction in the required parking
Carports - Five (5) covered parking structures (carports) shall be permitted as
shown on the site plan. The minimum parking space shall be measured 9 feet by 18
feet.
The following variance is being requested:
Driveway Stacking - The minimum stacking depth required is 75 feet. The
applicant is requesting a minimum stacking depth of 10 feet on both driveways.
Trash Enclosures – Allow joint use of an existing trash enclosure on property to the
south.
Multi-use Trail - The Pathways Master Plan recommends an 8-foot multi-use trail
along the west side of N. White Chapel Boulevard. The applicant is requesting to
escrow monies for future construction due to construction of the ultimate width of
Case No.
ZA07-015
N. White Chapel Boulevard planned for the near future.
At the May 15, 2007 City Council meeting were approved the proposal subject the the
applicant addressing the following:
Item Comments
1) Consider the view of covered parking along The plans have been revised. Carport has been moved to the
west side of building 4
White Chapel Blvd. Move covered parking
away from White Chapel Blvd. and
Countryside Court. Relocate carports to the
nd
interior parking areas. (revise plans before 2
reading)
Bring building 4 closer to White Chapel No change. The applicant will address at the meeting.
2)
3) Berm along White Chapel to limit the view of No change. The applicant will address at the meeting.
parking along the street.
Maintenance of tree preservation area The applicant will address at the meeting
4)
5) Undergrounding of utilities along White No change. The applicant will address at the meeting.
Chapel
1. Conduct public hearing
ACTION NEEDED:
2. Consider second reading for zoning change and site plan approval
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
Site Plan Review Summary No. 5 dated May 30, 2007
(D)
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(G) SPIN Meeting Report
(H) Ordinance No. 480-522
(I) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (748-8067)
Dennis Killough (748-8072)
Case No.
ZA07-015
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Wayne Lee & Associates
APPLICANT: Cheatham & Associates
PROPERTY SITUATION: 201 Countryside Court
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block B, Ravenaux Village Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial
CURRENT ZONING: “O-1” Office District
REQUESTED ZONING: “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
HISTORY: - Final Plat was approved for Ravenaux Addition in January 1988.
-“O-1” zoning was placed on the property with the adoption of Ordinance No.
480, in September 1989.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: The proposed site will have two (2) accesses directly onto Countryside Court
which intersects with N. White Chapel Boulevard. A common access stub-out
had been provided by the property to the south for future access to Countryside
Court. The connection is being made with the proposed site plan.
N. White Chapel Boulevard is currently a 2-lane, undivided roadway.
Construction of the ultimate pavement section (4 Divided, 88’ ROW) is
scheduled for the fiscal year 2006/2007.
May, 2006 traffic counts on N. White Chapel Blvd (between Highland
Ave and S.H. 114)
61734407
North Bound (NB) () South Bound (SB) ()
554434
Peak A.M. () 7:15 – 8:15 Peak A.M. () 8:15 – 9:15
a.m. a.m.
682359
Peak P.M. () 4:30 – 5:30 Peak P.M. () 3 – 4 p.m.
p.m.
Traffic Impact
Use Sq. Ft. Vtpd* AM-AM-PM-PM-
IN OUT IN OUT
General Office 28,500 314 39 6 7 35
*Vehicle Trips Per Day
**The AM/PM times represent the estimated number of vehicle trips generated during the peak
travel times on N. White Chapel Blvd.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA07-015 Page 1
PATHWAYS
MASTER PLAN: The Pathways Master Plan recommends an 8-foot multi-use trail along the west
side of N. White Chapel Boulevard. The trail is not shown on the site plan.
WATER & SEWER: A 12-inch water line exists along the west side of N. White Chapel Boulevard.
An 8-inch water line exists along the north side of Countryside Court. An 9-
inch sanitary sewer line exists along the south side of Countryside Court and
along the west side of N. White Chapel Boulevard.
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: Drainage is to be carried to the south into an existing natural channel along the
south boundary of the property. This area is also to be designed to handle the
required detention.
TREE PRESERVATION: The applicant has made a very good attempt to preserve a majority of the
existing trees within the proposed development. Most of the trees that are
proposed to be preserved within the drainage easement area along the south and
east sides of the development are Pecan, American Elm and Eastern Red Cedar
and are relatively young, As these trees mature they will provide a very
aesthetic park-like view to the development. Most all of the trees that are
proposed to be removed are Eastern Red Cedars.
P&Z ACTION: April 19, 2007; Approved to table (7-0) until May 3, 2007.
May 3, 2007; Approved (4-1) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 4,
dated April 27, 2007; and following modifications:
1)Granting the variance for shared trash enclosure subject to a joint use
agreement between the property owners;
2)Requiring that construction cost for the 8’ trail be escrowed to the City of
Southlake and constructed by the City with the White Chapel improvements
3)Approving the stacking variance subject to the first two (2) parking spaces
on the east driveway being removed and removing three (3) parking spaces
on the west driveway, two (2) spaces on the west side and one (1) space on
the east side of the west driveway;
4)Allowing Type “A” arbor style carports only.
COUNCIL ACTION: May 15, 2007; Approved first reading (6-0) subject to Site Plan Review
Summary No. 4, dated April 27, 2007; and subject to the following:
Consider the view of covered parking along White Chapel Blvd.
Move covered parking away from White Chapel Blvd. and
Countryside Court. Relocate carports to the interior parking areas.
nd
(revise plans before 2 reading)
Undergrounding of utilities along White Chapel
Bring building 4 closer to White Chapel
Berm along White Chapel to limit the view of parking along the
Case No. Attachment A
ZA07-015 Page 1
street.
Maintenance of tree preservation area
Subject to Planning and Zoning Commission’s recommendations
Granting requested variances
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated May 30, 2007.
N:\Community Development\MEMO\2007cases\07-015ZSP.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA07-015 Page 1
Case No. Attachment B
ZA07-015 Page 1
"S-P-1" Letter
“S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
for
COUNTRYSIDE WHITE CHAPEL OFFICE PARK
This site shall comply with all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480,
as amended, as it pertains to the “O-1 OFFICE DISTRICT” uses and regulations with the following
exceptions:
Development Regulations:
c. There shall be a side yard of not less than ten (10) feet.Bufferyards along the perimeter
boundary of the S-P-1 zoning district shall be in accordance with Section 42 and the
attached site plan. There shall be no bufferyards required along the interior lot boundaries
of lots subdivided within the S-P-1 zoning district.
i.Maximum Impervious Coverage: The maximum impervious coverage shall not exceed sixty
(60%) percent of the entire boundary of the S-P-1 zoning district. There shall be no maximum
for individual lots subdivided within the S-P-1 zoning district boundary.
j.Covered parking shall be allowed in the S-P-1 zoning district. The types of covered parking
allowed shall be in accordance with Section 45.11 of the Specific Use Permit and the attached
site plan with the following exceptions:
1. The minimum size of each space shall be 9’x18’.
Case No. Attachment C
Sixty (60%)
ZA07-015 Page 1
Previously Presented Site Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-015 Page 2
Revised Site Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-015 Page 3
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-015 Page 4
Building Elevations
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-015 Page 5
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-015 Page 6
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-015 Page 7
Carport Elevations
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-015 Page 8
Tree Conservation Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-015 Page 9
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA07-015Five5/30/07
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Site Plan
Project Name: – White Chapel Plaza Office Park Phase II, Lot 1, Block B, Ravenaux Village
Addition
APPLICANT: ENGINEER:
Wayne Lee & Associates Cheatham & Associates
Phone: (817) 410-4015 Phone: (817) 548-0696
Fax: (817) 410-7231 Fax: (817) 265-9532
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/29/07 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072.
1.The following changes are needed to the zoning regulations:
a.Include a regulation for parking. As shown a 20% reduction is proposed for limited to general
office uses only. Correct the required in the data summary accordingly. The required parking
for general professional office uses (no medical) is 8 spaces for the first 1000 square feet and 1
space per 300 sf for the remaining are, which will require 100 spaces for this site. Please be
aware that the parking ratio required for medical professional uses are 1 space per 150 sf.
2.Provide the minimum stacking depth of 75 feet. A minimum of 10 feet is provided on both driveways.
(Variance requested)
3.Provide adequate trash enclosures in accordance with the City’s franchise trash collector’s minimum
standards and design criteria. All enclosure must be screened by a minimum 8’ masonry wall similar to
(Applicant proposes joint use of
the building exterior with a solid metal gate and labeled on the plan.
an existing enclosure on the adjacent site. If approved in this form, a joint use and maintenance
agreement must be filed of record in the County.)
(Applicant requests to escrow the
4.Provide the 8' multi-use trail along N. White Chapel Boulevard.
construction cost to the City)
5.Show where carport columns would be and insure parking space width is maintained.
6.Correct the curb radii on the entry driveway to a minimum of 30 feet. This is a fire code
requirement and cannot be varied.
7.Update all plans to reflect the most recent plan modifications.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA07-015 Page 1
* A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans/documents and conditions of
approval is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or before
acceptance of any other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be reviewed and
stamped “approved” by the Planning Department.
* All development must comply with the City’s Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and detain all post
development run-off.
* The applicant proposes uses and regulations as depicted on the attached S-P-1 zoning document and
site plan.
* Buildings cannot encroach upon existing easements. A plat revision must be approved by the City and
filed of record in order to abandon the existing drainage & utility easement and subdivide the existing
lot as shown by this plan. The plat must also include the approval & signature block for all franchise
utility companies.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. All signs must comply with the Sign
Ordinance No 704-C. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and
filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and
building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but
not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap
Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA07-015 Page 2
Case No Review No.Dated: Number of Pages:
. 07-015 Four April 26, 2007 1
Project Name:
White Chapel Office Park (Zoning/Site Plan)
ContactPhone:Fax:
: Keith Martin (817) 748-8229 (817) 481-5713
===========================================================================
The following comments are based on the review of plans received on April 3, 2007 . Comments
designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the
Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z
or City Council. It is the applicant’s responsibility to contact the department representative shown above
and make modifications as required by the comment.
===========================================================================
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. The applicant has made a very good attempt to preserve a majority of the existing trees within the
proposed development. Most of the trees that are proposed to be preserved within the drainage
easement area along the south and east sides of the development are Pecan, American Elm and Eastern
Red Cedar and are relatively young, As these trees mature they will provide a very aesthetic park-like
view to the development. Most all of the trees that are proposed to be removed are Eastern Red
Cedars.
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
1. A Landscape Plan was not submitted with the proposed Site Plan submittal. Please submit a Landscape
Plan that meets the requirements outlined within Ordinance 544-A.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA07-015 Page 3
Surrounding Property Owners
White Chapel Office Park
SPO MAP
SPO #
Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage
Office Commercial
1.
Adelki, LLC SP1 0.512
Office Commercial
2.
Bengtson, Scott & Michelle SP1 0.392
Office Commercial
3.
Parker Pearson Lp SP1 0.784
Office Commercial
4.
Rec Properties Ltd SP1 0.431
Office Commercial
5.
Ahf-White Chapel Llc SP1 0.565
Office Commercial
6.
Baccus, Liana CS 3.034
Retail Commercial
7.
Stacy, James R & K Wayne Lee C1 2.667
Public/Semi-Public Office
8.
Countryside Bible Church SP1 Commercial 13.412
Office Commercial
9.
Wayne, Lee K O1 2.369
Office Commercial
10.
International Ch Four Square G SP1 3.777
Office Commercial
11.
International Ch Foursquare Go SP2 6.227
Retail Commercial
12.
White Chapel Village Ctr Prt C3 6.327
Retail Commercial
13.
White Chapel Village C Prt C3 0.404
Retail Commercial
14.
White Chapel Llc AG 0.896
Case No. Attachment E
ZA07-015 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
White Chapel Office Park
Notices Sent: Fourteen (14).
Responses Receive: Zero (0).
Case No. Attachment F
ZA07-015 Page 1
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO.
ZA07-015
PROJECT NAME:
White Chapel Plaza Office Park, Phase II
201 Countryside Ct.
Southwest Corner of N. White Chapel Blvd and Countryside Ct.
SPIN DISTRICT:
11
MEETING DATE:
7:30PM, JANUARY 8, 2007
MEETING LOCATION:
1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MEETING ROOM 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE:
Eight (8)
SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT:
Mike Terry
APPLICANT(S) PRESENT:
Bryan Tucker and K. Wayne Lee
STAFF PRESENT:
Planner Clayton Comstock
NOTE: NO RESIDENTS WERE PRESENT
STAFF CONTACT:
Clayton Comstock, (817)748-8269; ccomstock@ci.southlake.tx.us
APPLICANT PRESENTATION SUMMARY
Five buildings to be proposed – two for medical use and three for general office
Development to be laid out in a manner to avoid a city sewer lift station on N. White Chapel Blvd.
and to save a 28” Pecan tree.
Development to be of the same look and style of Phase I to the south
One dumpster to be shared between Phase I & Phase II (currently on Phase I)
Access to be from Countryside Court to the north and Phase I of the development to the South.
QUESTIONS / CONCERNS / COMMENTS
QUESTION: Are any variances being requested?
ANSWER: Yes, for parking reduction. Parking will also be available on Countryside Ct (10 spaces) and
the church property to the west.
QUESTION: What, if any signage is proposed?
ANSWER: A monument sign along N. White Chapel Blvd.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-522
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1,
BLOCK B, RAVENEAUX VILLAGE ADDITION, AND MORE FULLY
AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “O-1”
OFFICE DISTRICT TO “S-P-1” WITH “O-1” DISTRICT USES
DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL
WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS
HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS,
the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the
electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local
Government Code; and,
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to
adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures
and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the
purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a
comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS,
the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “O-1” Office District under the
City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
WHEREAS,
a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or
corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City
Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be
granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately
surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the
vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,
lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and
adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in
the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-
street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and
protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health
ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
facilities; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things
the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value
of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity
for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,
and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property
with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health
and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue
concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,
parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity
and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the
conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a
change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes
in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of
the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and
welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed
on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the
permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described
below:
Being Lot 1, Block B, Ravenaux Village Addition, being approximately 2.29 acres, and more
fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “O-1” Office District to “S-P-1” Detailed
Site Plan District with “O-1” Office District Uses as depicted on the approved Site Plan
attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to
all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent
ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words,
phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby
ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the
comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the
community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably
anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and
air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the
adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial
needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with
reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use
of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting
zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions
of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity
of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,
the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or
who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a
separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the
provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at
the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,
both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by
this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its
caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least
fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition
of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall
additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of
this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of ___________, 2007.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of __________, 2007.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
EXHIBIT “A”
Being Lot 1, Block B, Ravenaux Village Addition, being approximately 2.29 acres.
EXHIBIT “B”
“S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
for
COUNTRYSIDE WHITE CHAPEL OFFICE PARK
This site shall comply with all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480,
as amended, as it pertains to the “O-1 OFFICE DISTRICT” uses and regulations with the following
exceptions:
Development Regulations:
c. Zero lot line development may be permitted on a common interior lot line when approved by
the City Council after a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. There
shall be a side yard of not less than ten (10) feet.Bufferyards along the perimeter boundary
of the S-P-1 zoning district shall be in accordance with Section 42 and the attached site plan.
There shall be no bufferyards required along the interior lot boundaries of lots subdivided
within the S-P-1 zoning district.
k.Maximum Impervious Coverage: The maximum impervious coverage shall not exceed sixty
(60%) percent of the entire boundary of the S-P-1 zoning district. There shall be no maximum
for individual lots subdivided within the S-P-1 zoning district boundary.
l.Covered parking shall be allowed in the S-P-1 zoning district. The types of covered parking
allowed shall be in accordance with Section 45.11 of the Specific Use Permit and the attached
site plan with the following exceptions:
1. The minimum size of each space shall be 9’x18’.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
Site Plan
Sixty (60%)
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
Building Elevations
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
Carport Elevations
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1
Tree Conservation Plan
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-015 Page 1