Loading...
Item 4HCity of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 30, 2007 TO:Shana Yelverton, City Manager FROM: Greg Last,Director of Economic Development Approve agreement clarifying tax abatements for Sabre Holdings SUBJECT: ______________________________________________________________________________ Action Requested: Approve the agreement noted above. Background Information: Sabre desired to reduce their current real estate assets in both Southlake and Westlake by consolidating their staff into the two Headquarter Buildings (HQ) in Southlake. On or around December 8, 2006, Sabre consummated a transaction with Maguire Partners summarized as follows: Sabre will move employees out of their lease space in the Westlake portion of Solana and into the HQ. Sabre sold their 375,000 sf building to Maguire (Exhibit Two, tract 3). They will lease back the building from Maguire. Sabre sold the “Transferred Properties” (including ROW for T.W. King and Kirkwood) shown in Exhibit Two to Maguire and retained the “Retained Properties” The result of this transaction as it impacts the tax abatements previously approved for Sabre are the following: The Transferred Properties no longer qualify for tax abatements in accordance with clauses of the tax abatement agreements The Retained Properties (Premises A and B) still qualify for tax abatements per the agreements Given the confusion of the various “Premises” and a desire by Sabre (and the City) to clarify the current and ongoing status of the tax abatements, this document has been prepared to summarize the issue. Note that CSL Leasing Inc. is referenced as “Owner” in the agreement. They own the retained properties and are leasing them to Sabre, which is a qualifying arrangement in accordance with the tax abatement agreements. Basically there are no impacts on the tax abatement status of the Headquarters Buildings currently occupied by Sabre. Financial Considerations: The only financial consideration would be the elimination of properties potentially subject to future tax abatements (the “Transferred Properties”) Citizen Input/ Board Review: None required related to the agreement. Legal Review: The City Attorney’s office has been involved in the development of this agreement. Alternatives: 1. Approve the agreement as submitted 2. Approve a revised agreement 3. Take no action on the agreement and clarify with any future actions Supporting Documents:Exhibit One : Tax Abatement agreement “Premises” as approved Exhibit Two : Transferred and retained properties Exhibit Three : Agreement Staff Recommendation: Approve the agreement as submitted. Exhibit One Tax Abatement Agreement “Premises” as Approved Exhibit Two Transferred and Retained Properties Transferred Properties: 3-7 Retained Properties: 1-2 Exhibit Three Clarification Agreement DRAFT1-29-2007 CCTAA LARIFICATIONONCERNINGAXBATEMENTGREEMENTS This Clarification Concerning Tax Abatement Agreements (this “Clarification”) is made and entered into as of February [__], 2007, by and between CSL Leasing Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Owner”), and the City of Southlake, Texas (“the “City”). WHEREAS, in 1999, the City (pursuant to City Resolution No. 99-58), Sabre Inc. and certain other parties entered into eight separatetax abatement agreements (labeled as agreements A through H) with respect to property located in the City’s Reinvestment Zone Number Two (each such agreement, a “Tax Abatement Agreement”); WHEREAS, in 2000each of the Tax Abatement Agreements was amended by that certain Amendment to Tax Abatement Agreements, by and among the City, First Security Bank, National Association as owner trustee of the TSG Trust 1999-1 (“FSB”) and Sabre Inc. (the “Amendment”), to change exhibit B to each of the Tax Abatement Agreements, and to recognize that FSB was, as of the date of the Amendment, the “Owner” under each of the Tax Abatement Agreements (FSB became “Owner” pursuant to transfers that were approved pursuant to section VI.A.(iii) of each of the Tax Abatement Agreements) (each Tax Abatement Agreement, as amended by the Amendment, is hereinafter referred to as “Amended Tax Abatement Agreement” and such agreements are collectively referred to as the “Amended Tax Abatement Agreements”); WHEREAS, pursuant to City Resolution No. 03-030, in 2003 theCity consented in advance to certain transfers of Amended Tax Abatement Agreements and property subject to Amended Tax Abatement Agreements to affiliate(s) of Sabre Holdings Corporation (“Sabre”) or to an entity leasing such property back to Sabre or its affiliate (the “Affiliated Transaction Consent”), and shortly thereafter FSB transferred all eight Amended Tax Abatement Agreements and all property subject to the Amended Tax Abatement Agreements to CSL Leasing Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CSL”), which leased such property back to Sabre Inc., a Sabre affiliate; Sabre (through its attorney) notified the City of such transfers in a letter to the City dated July 23, 2003; WHEREAS, CSL has been receiving tax abatements under Amended Tax Abatement Agreement A, but has not yet received any tax abatements under any other Amended Tax Abatement Agreement (CSL has not met the condition in Section II.A.(1) in any other Amended Tax Abatement Agreement); WHEREAS, in December, 2006 (the “Sale Date”), CSL transferred to Maguire Partners – Solana Limited Partnership and Maguire Partners Southlake Land LP (collectively, “Buyer”): (a) certain property (including certain roads but not including any vertical improvements) within the boundaries of the “Premises” (as defined in Amended Tax Abatement Agreement A) of Amended Tax Abatement Agreement A (the portion of property within the boundaries of the “Premises” of Amended Tax Abatement Agreement A that was transferred to Buyer is hereinafter referred to as “Transferred Abatement Agreement A Property;” and the portion of property within the boundaries of the “Premises” of Amended Tax Abatement Agreement A that is not Transferred Abatement Agreement A Property is hereinafter referred to as “Retained Abatement Agreement A Property”); (b) certain property (including certain roads but not 1 011907.00005:992274.07 including any vertical improvements, as there are not yet any vertical improvements on the “Premises” of Amended Tax Abatement Agreement B) within the boundaries of the “Premises” (as defined in Amended Tax Abatement Agreement B) of Tax Abatement Agreement B (the portion of property within the boundaries of the “Premises” of Amended Tax Abatement Agreement B that was transferred to Buyer is hereinafter referred to as “Transferred Abatement Agreement B Property;” and the portion of property within the boundaries of the “Premises” of Amended Tax Abatement Agreement B that is not Transferred Abatement Agreement B Property is hereinafter referred to as “Retained Abatement Agreement B Property”); and (c) all or almost all of the property subject to Tax Abatement Agreements C, D, E, F, G and H; WHEREAS, section VI.B. of each of the Amended Tax Abatement Agreements provides that a transfer of fee simple title to any portion of the “Premises” (as defined in such agreement) to a buyer that is not a permitted transferee shall result in the termination for subsequent years of the tax abatement under such agreement, but only with respect to the property transferred, indicating that such transfer would not affect the transferor’s right to receive tax abatements with respect to the portion of the “Premises” not transferred (the “Section VI.B. Transfer Provision”) (the non-transferred properties under Amended Tax Abatement Agreements A and B are referred to above as Retained Abatement Agreement A Property and Retained Abatement Agreement B Property); WHEREAS, Buyer is not an affiliate of Sabre, nor is Buyer leasing any of the acquired property to Sabre or its affiliate; thus, such transfers are not subject to the Affiliated Transaction Consent; WHEREAS, the City and Owner desire to clarify the current and ongoing status of the Amended Tax Abatement Agreements subsequent to the transfers described above. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Owner hereby waives its rights to receive tax abatements under any retained property subject to Amended Tax Abatement Agreements C, D, E, F, G and H. 2. The City agrees that, pursuant to the Section VI.B. Transfer Provision, Amended Tax Abatement Agreement A continues to apply to the Retained Abatement Agreement A Property. 3. The City agrees that, pursuant to the Section VI.B. Transfer Provision, Amended Tax Abatement Agreement B continues to apply to the Retained Abatement Agreement B Property. 4. This Clarification may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and said counterparts shall constitute but one and the same instrument which may be sufficiently evidenced by one counterpart. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 2 011907.00005:992274.07 IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the foregoing instrument has been duly executed by the undersigned as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ________________________________ Andrew Wambsganss, Mayor CSL LEASING INC., a Delaware corporation By: Name: Title: ATTEST: __________________________ City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________ City Attorney 3 011907.00005:992274.07