Loading...
Item 9DCity of Southlake, Texas M E M O R A N D U M January 9, 2007 TO: Shana Yelverton, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Director of Economic Development Consider any action necessary regarding Request for Bid #0609A161PS600207 SUBJECT: related to branding Southlake. _________________________________________________________________________________ Action Requested: Consider any action necessary regarding Request for Bid #0609A161PS600207 related to branding Southlake. Background Information: The most recent request for bid (RFB) on the branding initiative was combined with a component requesting bids for hotel tax marketing services. Although there were no bids submitted for the hotel component, we did receive three (3) bids for the branding services as follows: Northstar Destinations: $105,000 Torch Creative: $52,500 The Richards Group: $149,500 The evaluation team of Councilmembers Hill and Terrell, Jim Blagg, Pilar Schank, Stefanie Wagoner, Joe Herzog (Leadership Southlake) and I evaluated the proposals and interviewed Northstar and Richards. All three firms have positives and negatives, not the smallest of which is the proposed cost for two of the proposers. Given the importance of this item we felt it prudent to bring the item before Council for feedback and direction. Financial Considerations: The City Manager’s Office will be bringing forth a proposal to include this project under the Strategic Initiative Fund. Financial Impact: Citizen Input/ Board Review: There have been public City Council meetings where this topic has been discussed. Legal Review: The City Attorney’s office has been heavily involved in the evaluation of the RFB submittals. Shana Yelverton Branding Page 2 Alternatives: 1. Select a vendor from the current proposals, as submitted 2. Reject all bids as submitted 2a. Initiate interviews with qualified consultants under a more narrowly defined scope of services (logo redesign predominantly) with a targeted contract amount less than $25,000 2b. Hold on the project 3. Other alternative per Council’s direction Supporting Documents: Staff Recommendation: Unless Council is comfortable with the costs as submitted, staff recommends alternative 2a noted above.