The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 7A - Roadway CIP Report�� 11, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Prepared by: rM Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 801 Cherry Street, Unit 11, Suite 950 Fort Worth, TX 76102 817.335.6511 December 6, 2007 © hinileN -Horn and associates, Inc., 2007 061237000 . H.... ....... 4wF.. +eenax.. ..yp�..• i................ = 95823 �' Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Table of Contents SOUTHLAKE TEXAS I Introduction ................................................................................................... ............................... 1 II Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Inputs ...................................................... ............................... 2 A. Impact Fee Service Areas ......................................................................................... ............................... 2 B. Land Use Assumptions ............................................................................................. ............................... 2 C. Capital Improvements Plan ....................................................................................... ............................... 2 III Methodology For Roadway Impact Fees ...................................................... ............................... 5 A. Service Units ............................................................................................................ ............................... 5 B. Cost Per Service Unit ............................................................................................... ............................... 5 C. Cost of the C1P ......................................................................................................... ............................... 6 D. Service Unit Calculation ........................................................................................... ............................... 8 1VImpact Fee Calculation ............................................................................... ............................... 12 A. Maximurn Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit ................................................. ............................... 12 B. Plan For Awarding the Roadway Impact Fee Credit ................................................ ............................... 13 C. Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development ...................................................... ............................... 15 V Sample Calculations .................................................................................... ............................... 17 VIConclusion ..................................................................................................... .............................19 APPENDICES ...................................................................................................... ............................... 20 A. Opinion of Project Cost Worksheets B. CIP Service Units of Supply C. Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update t December 6, 2007 City of Soutblake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. List of Exhibits SOUTHLAKE Texas 1 Capital Improvements Plan for Roadway Impact Fees ........................................ ............................... 4 List of Tables 1 Land Use Assumptions for Roadway Impact Fees .............................................. ............................... 2 2 Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees .......................................... ............................... 3 3 Level of Use Table ............................................................................................. ............................... 5 4 Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees with Conceptual Level Cost Opinions .............. 7 5 Transportation Demand Factor Calculations ..................................................... ............................... 10 6 Ten Year Growth Projections ........................................................................... ............................... 11 7 Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee ..................................................... ............................... 14 8 Land Use /Vehicle -Mile Equivalency Table ( LUVMET) ................................... ............................... 16 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 11 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas ❑ Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. I INTRODUCTION CITY Q' SOUTHLAK.E TEXAS Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure Texas cities must follow in order to create and implement impact fees. Senate Bill 243 (SB 243) amended Chapter 395 in 2001 to define an Impact Fee as "a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development. Chapter 395 mandates that impact fees be reviewed and updated at least every five (5) years. Accordingly, the City of Southlake has initiated a review of its Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan, and Impact Fees. The City has retained Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc., to provide professional transportation engineering services for the update of their Roadway Impact Fees. This report includes the update of the impact fee calculation methodology in accordance with SB 243 and the adopted revisions to the Land Use Assumptions and the roadway Capital Improvements Plan. This report introduces and references two of the basic inputs to the Roadway Impact Fee: the Land Use Assumptions and the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). Information from these two components is used extensively in the remainder of the report. This report consists of a detailed discussion of the methodology for the computation of impact fees. This discussion - Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees and Impact Fee Calculation - addresses each of the components of the computation and modifications required for the update. The components include: • Service Areas • Service Units • Cost Per Service Unit • Cost of the CIP • Service Unit Calculation • Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit • Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development The report also includes a section concerning the Plan for Awarding the Roadway Impact Fee Credit. In the case of Roadway Impact Fees, this involves the calculation of the credit for the use of ad valorem taxes to fund the Impact Fee CIP. This plan, prepared by Mclain Decision Support Systems and upon which we relied, details the maximum assessable impact fee per service unit the City of Southlake may apply under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. The final section of the report is the Conclusion, which presents the findings of the update analysis. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update t December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE TEXAS II ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CALCULATION INPUTS A. IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREAS The three (3) service areas used in the 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update are shown in Exhibit 1. These service areas cover the entire corporate boundary of the City of Southlake. SB 243 amended Chapter 395 to define a service area as "an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles." An inspection of the previous service area structure indicates the reduction in the number of service areas from eight (8) to three (3) is reasonable based on the new six (6) mile limit. B. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS The land use assumptions upon which we relied are presented in a separate report titled Land Use Assumptions Report (LUA), prepared by The City of Southlake, and dated November 2006. Table 1 presents the land use assumptions (by service area) contained in the LUA report utilized in the roadway impact fee calculation. Table 1. Land Use Assumptions for Roadway Impact Fees Service year Population Units Employment (Square Feet) I Basic Service I Retail I Total Area 2007 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3,376 1,042 477,282 617,310 650,180 1,714,164 ............................... A 2017 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4,620 1,426 477,282 950,874 849,060 2,277,836 ............................... Build Out 4,984 1,538 477,282 1,117,295 950,380 2,544,957 2007 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 11,775 3,634 343,086 444,391 467,780 1,255,257 ............................... B 2017 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 13,677 4,221 467,154 1,454,830 907,060 2,829,044 ............................... Build Out 14,820 4,440 495,006 1,943,985 1,094,400 3,533,391 2007 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 10,500 3,240 893,796 1,156,644 1,217,900 3,268,340 ............................... C 2017 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13,627 4,206 2,018,004 2,964,532 2,571,840 7,554,376 ........................ ... .... .......... L Build Out 14,820 4,574 2,384,511 3,916,128 3,170,720 9,471,359 C. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN The City has identified the City- funded transportation projects needed to accommodate the projected growth within the City. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) for Roadway Impact Fees is a list of these projects. The CIP includes arterial and major collector class roadway facilities. All of the arterial and collector facilities are part of the currently adopted Master Thoroughfare Plan. It should be noted that the Capital Improvement Plan includes a listing of both proposed capacity improvement projects and recently completed projects with excess capacity to serve new growth. The CIP for Roadway Impact Fees that is proposed for the Impact Fee Update is listed in Table 2 and mapped in Exhibit 1. The table shows the length of each project as well as the facility's 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 2 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Master Thoroughfare Plan classification. The CIP was developed in conjunction with input from City of Southlake staff and represents those projects that will be needed to accommodate the growth projected in the Land Use Assumptions Report. Table 2. Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees Service Area Proj. # Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % III Service Area A -1 A41)(100)(1/2) Kirkwood Blvd. (1) Tyler St. to Stockton Dr. 0.40 100% A -2 A4D(88) West Dove Rd. (2) SH 114 to Kirkwood Blvd. 0.22 100% A -3 A41)(88) West Dove Rd. (3) Kirkwood Blvd. to White Chapel Blvd. 0.22 100% A -4, C -16 A4D(88) East Dove Rd. (1) White Chapel Blvd. to Dove Creek 1.40 50% A A -5 A4D(100) Kirkwood Blvd. (2) West Dove Rd. to North White Chapel Blvd. 0.46 100% A -6, C -17 A4D(88) North White Chapel Blvd. (1) East Dove Rd. to SH 114 050 50% I -3 Intersection W. Dove Rd. at SH 114 (complete) 11 50% 1 -4 Intersection White Chapel Blvd. at SH 114 (complete) n/a 25% 1 -6 Intersection White Chapel Blvd. at Dove Rd. (Roundabout) n/a 75% 1 -8 Intersection Carroll Ave. at Dove Rd. (Roundabout) n/a 50 9 /6 B -1 A3U North Pearson Ln. Florence Rd. to FM 1709 1.00 100% B -2 C2U Watermere Dr. FM 1709 to Union Church Rd. 0.21 100% B -3 A6D Randol Mill Ave. (FM 1938) Northern city limits to FM 1709 1.97 100% B -4 C2U Durham Ln. Shady Oaks Dr. to South White Chapel Blvd. 0.50 100% B B -5, C -I8 A4D(88) North White Chapel Blvd. (2) SH 114 to FM 1709 1.36 50" o B -6 A4D(88) West Dove Rd. (1) W. City Limits to SH 114 0.64 100% 1 -3 Intersection W. Dove Rd. at SH 114 (complete) n/a 50% 1 -4 Intersection White Chapel Blvd. at SH 114 (complete) n/a 25% 1 -5 Intersection Peytonville and White Chapel at FM 1709 (complete) n/a 100% 1 -7 Intersection White Chapel Blvd. at Continental Blvd. (Roundabout) n/a 50% C -1 A4D(88) East Dove Rd. (2) Dove Creek to N. Kimball Ave. 0.84 100% C -2 A4D(100) North Carroll Ave, (1) SH 114 to FM 1709 0.62 100% C -3 A4D(100) Kirkwood Blvd. (3) North White Chapel Blvd. to East Highland St. 1.36 100% C -4 A4D(l00) Kirkwood Blvd. (4) East Highland to North Kimball Ave. 1.36 100% C -5 A4D(100) Aventerra Connector SH 114 to Kirkwood Blvd. 0.29 100% C -6 A4D(100) Grace Ln. SH 114 to Kirkwood Blvd. 0.22 100% C -7 A3U East Highland St. (1) North White Chapel Blvd. to SH 114 0.61 100% C -8 A3U East Highland St. (2) Sit 114 to future Kirkwood Blvd. (575' east of North Carroll Ave.) 0.47 100% C -9 C2U Zena Rucker Rd. Byron Nelson Pkwy. to South Carroll Ave. 0.36 100% C -10 A41)(88) South Carroll Ave. (1) 1015' south of East Southlake Blvd. to Westmont Dr. 0.43 100% C -11 A41)(88)(1/2) South Carroll Ave. (2) Westmont Dr. to 290' north of Breeze Wy. 0.10 100% C -12 A41)(88) Brutnlow Ave. East Continental Blvd. to 250' north of southern city limits 0.71 100% C C -13 C2U South Village Center Dr. 705' south of East Southlake Blvd. to N. Nolan Dr. 0.80 100% C -14 A4D(88) North Kimball Ave. Dove Rd. to 360' north of SH 114 westbound frontage road 1.08 100% C -15 A41)(88) South Kimball Ave. FM 1709 to SH 26 1.43 100% A -4, C -16 A41)(88) East Dove Rd. (1) White Chapel Blvd. to Dove Creek 1.40 50% A -6, C -17 A4D(88) North White Chapel Blvd. (1) East Dove Rd. to SH 114 0.50 50% B -5, C -18 A41)(88) North White Chapel Blvd. (2) SH 114 to FM 1709 1.36 50% I -1 Intersection Brumlow Ave. at SH 26 (complete) n/a 100% I -2 Intersection Carroll Ave. at FM 1709 (complete) n/a 100% 1 -4 Intersection White Chapel Blvd. at SH 114 (complete) n/a 50% I -6 Intersection White Chapel Blvd. at Dove Rd. (Roundabout) n/a 25% I -7 Intersection White Chapel Blvd. at Continental Blvd. (Roundabout) n/a 50% 1 -8 Intersection Carroll Ave. at Dove Rd. (Roundabout) n/a 50% 1 -9 Intersection Continental Blvd. at Byron Nelson Pkwy. (Roundabout) n/a 100% 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 3 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Legend Exhib 1 Impact Fee Eligible Facilities Other Thoroughfare Facilities CITY of Intersection Improvements SOUTHLAICE Roadway Service Areas Impact Fee Streams C I P Lakes Local Roads � Kimley -Ham December 6, 2007 ardAssoclatas,Ino u Tro b Bob Jones Rcf. � y lu i i F- r Wesdak Dove Rd. a 1� Hi hland St. l -. ~� m Durham Ln. zlin �C �( S Q a° S ry4 f `m Johnson Rd. Southlake Blvd. — i Z a >. ena Rucker d. Village Center Dr. Keller — E m Y ' a C - l o > - z g Continental BI Union Church Rd. m j Grape e colley0le o Richland Hills 0 0 1 2 3 momd Miles Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE Texas III METHODOLOGY FOR ROADWAY IMPACT FEES A. SERVICE UNITS The "service unit" is a measure of consumption or use of the capital facilities by new development. In other words, it is the measure of supply and demand for roads in the City. For transportation purposes, the service unit is defined as a vehicle -mile. On the supply side, this is a lane -mile of an arterial or a collector street. On the demand side, this is a vehicle -trip of one -mile in length. The application of this unit as an estimate of either supply or demand is based on travel during the afternoon peak hour of traffic. This time period is commonly used as the basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips created by new development. Another aspect of the service unit is the service volume that is provided (supplied) by a lane -mile of roadway facility. This number, also referred to as capacity, is a function of the facility type, facility configuration, number of lanes, and level of service. The hourly service volumes used in the Roadway Impact Fee Update are based upon Thoroughfare Capacity Criteria published by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). Table 3 shows the service volumes as a function of the facility type. Table 3. Level of Use Table Facility Type Median Configuration Hourly Vehicle -Mile Capacity per Lane -Mile of Roadway Facilit Arterial Divided 725 Undivided 650 Collector Undivided 525 B. COST PER SERVICE UNIT A fundamental step in the impact fee process is to establish the cost for each service unit. In the case of the roadway impact fee, this is the cost for each vehicle -mile of travel. This cost per service unit is the cost to construct a roadway (lane -mile) needed to accommodate a vehicle -mile of travel at a level of service corresponding to the City's standards. The cost per service unit is calculated for each service area based on a specific list of projects within that service area. The second component of the cost per service unit is the number of service units in each service area. This number is the measure of the growth in transportation demand that is projected to occur in the ten -year period. Chapter 395 requires that Impact Fees are assessed only to pay for growth projected to occur within the next ten years, a concept that will be covered in a later section of this report. As noted earlier, the units of demand are vehicle -miles of travel. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 5 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. C. COST OF THE CIP SOUTHLAKE Texas The costs that may be included in the cost per service unit are all of the implementation costs for the Impact Fee Update, as well as project costs for thoroughfare system elements within the Capital Improvements Plan. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that the allowable costs are "...including and limited to the: 1. Construction contract price; 2. Surveying and engineering fees; 3. Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney's fees, and expert witness fees; and 4. Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision." The engineer's opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the CIP is based, in part, on the calculation of a unit cost of construction. This means that a cost per linear foot of roadway is calculated based on an average price for the various components of roadway construction. This allows the probable cost to be determined by the type of facility being constructed, the number of lanes, and the length of the project. The cost for location specific items such as bridges, traffic signals, drainage structures, and any other special components are added to each project as appropriate. In addition, based on discussions with City of Southlake staff, state and county highway projects in which the City will contribute a portion of the total project cost have been included in the CIP as lump sum costs. Table 4 is the CIP project list for each service area with planning level probable project costs. Detailed cost projections and methodology used for each individual project can be seen in Appendix A, Opinion of Project Cost Worksheets. It should be noted that these tables reflect only conceptual -level opinions or assumptions regarding the portions of future project costs that are recoverable through impact fees. Actual costs of construction are likely to change with time and are dependent on market and economic conditions that cannot be precisely predicted at this time. This CIP establishes the list of projects for which Impact Fees may be utilized. Essentially, it establishes a list of projects for which an impact fee funding program can be established. This is different from a City's construction CIP, which provides a list of projects for which the City is committed to building. The cost projections utilized in this update should not be utilized for the City's building program or construction CIP. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 6 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Table 4. Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees with Conceptual Level Cost Opinions Service Area Proj. # Class Roadway Limits Length on) 'Z, In Service Area Total Project Cost Cast in Service Area A -1 A4D(100)(I/2) Kirkwood Blvd. (1) Tylcr St. m Stockton Dr. 0.40 I00 $ 1.284.000 $ 1?84000 A -2 A41)(88) West Dove Rd (2) SH 114 to Kirkwood Blvd. 0''_ 100 °„ $ 369.677 $ 369.1 „7 A -3 A4D(88) ANc,t Do,c Rd (3) Kirkwood Blvd to Ak hire Chapel Blvd 0.22 1()(" , $ 1.302.000 $ 1.30'.(1(1(1 A -4, C -16 A4D(88) East Dove Rd. (1) White Chapel Md. to Dove C'r„k 1.40 50 °.,, $ 8.801.000 $ 4.400500 A -5 A41)(100) Kirkwood Blvd. (2) West Dove Rd n,Nonh \y hit, Chapcl Bled 0.46 1 100',. $ 2.778.000 $ 2,778.000 B A -6, G 171 A41)(88) North While Chapel Blvd (1) East Dore Rd. to SI 1 114 1 0.50 1 50 ", $ 3.204.000 $ 1,602.000 A I -3 1 Intersection W. Dove Rd. at SH 1 14 (compl,t,) n/a 50 ", $ 192,496 $ 96'48 14 1 Intersection White Chapel Blvd at SH 114(compl,t,) n/a - $ 866.478 $ 216.6'0 1 -6 Intersection White Chapel Blvd. at Dove Rd,(Rounda hoot) n/a 759,. $ 750.000 $ 56 1 -8 T Intersection Carroll Ave. at Dove Rd. (Roundabout) n/a 509s, $ 800.000 $ 400.000 Service Area Project Cost Subtotal 25% Financing Roadway Impact Fee Studv Cost (Per Service Area) $ 13,011,545 $ 3,252 886 Enst Continental Blvd to 250' north Ofxnuheru ci to 11 111 t Total Cost in SERVICE AREA A $ 16,274,031 Total Cost in SERVICE AREA B $ 24,892,494 B -1 A3U North Pearson Ln. Florence Rd. to FM 1709 1.00 100% $ 4.560.000 $ 4.560.000 B -2 C2U Watcrmere Dr. FM 1709 to Union Church Rd. 0.21 100% $ 7'_7.000 $ 727.000 B -3 A613 Randol Mill Ave. (FM 1938) Northern city Limits to I VI 1709 1.97 100% $ 1.070.000 $ 1,070900 B -4 C2U Dudtam Ln. Shady Oaks Dr. to South While Chapel Blvd. 0.50 100 ° /u $ 1,705,000 $ 1.705,000 B -5, C -18 A4D(88) North Whit, Chapel Blvd (2) SH 114 to PM 1709 1.36 50% $ 6.529.000 $ ',.'64-500 B -6 A4D(88) W,st Day, Rd. (1) W. City Lar- to SH 114 0.64 100% $ 4913900 $ 4.013.000 B t -3 1111 --lion W. Doec Rd at SI1 1 14 (c( plete) We 50% $ 192.496 $ 96248 C -8 Intnnstion Whim Chapel Blvd at S l l 114(compld,) n/a 25% $ 866,478 $ 216.6'_0 1-5 1.1--lion Pcytonville and While Chapel atIA11709(compld,) n/a 100 %, $ 3,878.948 $ 3.8 941 1 -7 Intcncction Whitc Chapel Blvd. at Continenw l Blvd. (Roundabout) n/a 50 %. $ 750.000 $ 375.00(1 Service Area Project Cost Subtotal 25% Financing Roadway Impact Fee Study Cost (Per Service Area) $ 19,906,316 $ 4,976,579 $ 9,600 Total Cost in SERVICE AREA B $ 24,892,494 Total Cost in SERVICE AREA C $ 90,459,212 Note: These costs projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 7 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas C -1 A4D(88) Ea,I Dove Rd. (2) Dove Creek to N. Kimball Ave. 0.84 100% $ 6.079.000 $ 6.079.000 C -2 A41)(100) North Carroll Ave. (1) SH 114 to FM 1709 0.62 100% $ 2,971,129 $ 2.971.129 C -3 A41)(100) Kirkwood Blvd. (3) North White Chapel Blvd to East Highland St. 1.36 100% $ 9.472.000 $ 9.472.000 C4 A4D(100) Kirkwood Blvd. (4) East Highland to North Kimball Ave. 1.36 100% $ 8.560.000 $ 8560.000 C -5 A41)(100) Aventerm Connector S I 114 to Kirkwood Blvd. 0.29 100% $ 1,749.000 $ 1.749.000 C -6 A4D(I 00) Grace Ln. 51 -I 1 14 to Kirkwood Blvd 0.22 100% $ 1291.000 $ 1,291,000 C -7 A3U East Highland St. (1) Aunh White Chapel Blvd. to SH 114 0.61 100% $ 2.708.000 $ 2,708,000 C -8 A3U East Highland St. (2) SH 114 to f,tur, Kirkwood Blvd (575 east or North Carroll Av,.l 0.47 100 0 %, $ 1.930900 $ 1930,000 C-9 C2U Zena Rucker Rd. Byron Nelson Pkwy. to South Carroll Ave. 0.36 100% $ 1.056.000 $ 1,056,000 C' -10 A41)(88) South Carroll Ave. (1) 101 s' .outh of East Southlake Blvd n, VA -oiont Dr 0.43 100% $ 2.551.000 $ 2,551,000 C -I I A4D(88)(1/2) South Carroll Ave (2) Ai'estmout Dr. to 290' north of 13 -- AAA. 0.10 100% $ 318900 $ 318900 C' -II A4D(88) BmmlowA- Enst Continental Blvd to 250' north Ofxnuheru ci to 11 111 t 0.71 100°0 $ 4.459.000 $ 4.459.000 C -13 C21J South village Caucr Dr. 705',outIt o(East Southlake Blvd. to\, \olau Dr. 080 1o(1 °„ $ 2.561,000 $ 2361000 C C -14 A41)(88) North Kimball Ave. Dove Rd. to 360' north of SH 114 wesm-1111 Ihuu(,, n,aJ 1.08 100 $ 5.128.000 $ 5.12 1.0101 0 C-15 A41)(88) South Kimball Ave. PM 1709 Iv SH 26 143 100 1 „ s 7.886.135 $ 13 A -4, C -16 A41)($8) East Dove Rd (1) AN rac Chapel Blvd to Dove C'r,ek 1.40 50 11 1 8.801.000 $ 4.400.,00 A -6. G17 A4D(88) North White Chapel Bled 1 I) Last Dove Rd. to SH 114 0.50 50 ", $ 3.204900 $ 1.602.000 B -5, C -18 A4D(88) North While Chapel Blvd (_) SH 114 to FA1 1709 1.36 509„ S 6.529.000 $ 3,264.500 I -1 Innrscction BmmlowA,c. at SH 26(compl -) a a 100% $ 1269258 $ 1,269,258 1 -2 firl'i ction Carroll Ave. at EM 1709 (complete) 11 a 10095, $ 958.429 $ 958.439 14 lntci -tion Whit, Chapcl Blvd. at SH 114(complctc) 11 a 50111 866.478 $ 433.'39 1 -6 Intnnstion White Chapel Blvd. at Dove Rd (Ro indaboul) il a $ 750900 $ 187.100 1 -7 Intcncction Wit itc Chapcl Blvd. at Continental Blvd, (Roundabout) 50 °„ $ 750.000 $ 375.000 1 -8 Intcncction Carroll Arc. at Dove Rd. (Roundabout) 50 °„ $ 800.000 S 400,000 IA Intersection Continentat Blvd. at Byron Nelson Pkwv. (Roundabout) a 100o/.' $ 750.000 $ 750.000 Service Area Project Cost Subtotal 25% Financing Roadway Impact Fee Studv Cost (Per Service Area) $ 72,359,690 $ 18,089,922 $ 9,600 Total Cost in SERVICE AREA C $ 90,459,212 Note: These costs projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 7 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE TEXAS D. SERVICE UNIT CALCULATION The basic service unit for the computation of Southlake's transportation impact fees is the vehicle -mile of travel during the afternoon peak -hour. To determine the cost per service unit, it is necessary to project the growth in vehicle miles of travel for the service area for the ten -year period. The growth in vehicle miles from 2007 to 2017 is based upon projected changes in population and employment for the period. In order to determine this growth, estimates of population, basic employment, service employment, and retail employment for 2007 were made, along with projections for each of these demographic statistics through 2017. The Land Use Assumptions section of this report details the growth estimates used for impact fee determination. The population and employment statistics in the Land Use Assumptions provides the "independent variables" that are used to calculate the existing (2007) and projected (2017) transportation service units used to establish the roadway impact fee maximum rates within each service area. The roadway demand service units (vehicle miles) for each service area are the sum of the vehicle miles "generated" by each category of land use in the service area. For the purposes of impact fees, all developed and developable land is categorized as either residential or non - residential. For residential land uses, the existing and projected population is converted to dwelling units. The number of dwelling units in each service area is multiplied by a transportation demand factor to compute the vehicle miles of travel that occur during the afternoon peak hour. This factor computes the average amount of demand caused by the residential land uses in the service area. The transportation demand factor is discussed in more detail below. For non - residential land uses, the process is similar. The Land Use Assumptions provides existing and projected number of building square footages for three (3) categories of employment — basic, service, and retail. These categories correspond to an aggregation of other specific land use categories based on the Standard Industrial Classification Code. Building square footage is the most common independent variable for the estimation of non- residential trips in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7`" Edition. This statistic is more appropriate than the number of employees because building square footage is tied more closely to trip generation and is known at the time of application for any development or development modification (e.g. increase in density or change in land use) that would require the assessment of an impact fee. The existing and projected land use assumptions for the dwelling units and the square footage of basic, service, and retail land uses provide the basis for the projected increase in vehicle miles of travel. As noted earlier, a transportation demand factor is applied to these values and then summed to calculate the total peak hour vehicle -miles of demand for each service area. The transportation demand factors are aggregate rates derived from two sources — the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7`" Edition and the latest Regional Origin - Destination Travel Survey performed by NCTCOG. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7' Edition provides the number of trips that are produced or attracted to the land use for each dwelling unit, square foot of building, or other corresponding unit. For the retail category of land uses, the rate is adjusted to account for the fact that a percentage of retail trips are made by people who would otherwise be traveling 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE Texas past that particular establishment anyway, such as a trip between work and home. These trips are called pass -by trips, and since the travel demand is accounted for in the land use calculations relative to the primary trip, it is necessary to discount the retail rate to avoid double counting trips. The next component of the transportation demand factor accounts for the length of each trip. The average trip length for each category is based on the region -wide travel characteristics survey conducted by NCTCOG. The computation of the transportation demand factor is detailed in the following equation: TD =1 *(I— Pb) *Lmax where... L max = min(L * OD or 4) Variables: TDF = Transportation Demand Factor, T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit), Pb = Pass -By Discount (% of trips), L max = Maximum Trip Length (miles), L = Average Trip Length (miles), and OD = Origin- Destination Reduction (50 %) The maximum trip length was limited to four (4) miles based on the maximum trip length within each service area. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code allows for a service area diameter of six (6) miles; however, the service areas within Southlake are more closely approximated by a four (4) mile diameter. The adjustment made to the average trip length statistic in the computation of the maximum trip length is the origin - destination reduction. This adjustment is made because the roadway impact fee is charged to both the origin and destination end of the trip. For example, impact fee methodology will account for a trip from home to work within Southlake to both residential and non - residential land uses. To avoid counting these trips as both residential and non- residential trips, a 50% origin- destination (OD) reduction factor is applied. Therefore, only half of the trip length is assessed to each land use. Table 5 shows the derivation of the Transportation Demand Factor for the residential land uses and the three (3) non - residential land use categories for all service areas. The values utilized for all variables shown in the transportation demand factor equation are also shown in the table. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 9 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE Texas Table 5. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations Variable Residential Basic Service Retail T 1.01 0.98 1.49 5.06 P b 0% 0% 0 % 30% L 17.21 10.02 10.92 6.43 Lmax * 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.22 TDF 4.04 3.92 5.96 11.38 * L,,, ,, is less than 4 miles for retail land uses; therefore this lower trip length is used for calculating the TDF for non - residential land uses The application of the demographic projections and the transportation demand factors are presented in the 10 -Year Growth Projections in Table 6. This table shows the total vehicle miles by service area for the years 2007 and 2017, along with the build -out projections. These estimates and projections lead to the Vehicle Miles of Travel for 2007, 2017, and for build out. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 10 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. O E U �O O r }y V }y 1 H F O H 00 r 7 N H N N 00 H N N N N N M N r N M M N H 7 00 N N U w o N 0 0 O 0 J W N W J w Z U F 7 M M J 7 � W W J U U = Z 07 J J ~ a a a N O N 7 O N Q 3 z Z W 0 M M � N Z W U 7 O M O N h a 0 UQ h o 0 Q R N Fu) U o F m N y N R ~ ) 0 N M O r 00 N O C% N O 7 r O O N M iY1 W N M 7 N M O M H 0 N O N W M N r N H H O O 7 N H M O H H 00 H 7 H M 0 N N N 00 O r N rn N M M N 7 H 00 0 W J a F W 9 N W o! J N J ~ 3 Q W O a a y s Z U F ON1 J 7 � M W r N a O � a- 0 UQ o K W Q 00 U o F m N F SOUTHLAKE Texas V1 N G O N V1 G V1 Q f0 N a d m m - O m O U 2 � a � � o U N O1 N w � N T � � m f0 -p N N � m m U � N 0O N �O w o a Lu - O � a m 12 N LL Q o a o -`• � U C N N N m o m 0 o O LL m d I d l0 O� l0 O O U O � V1 U U = 22 - q2 m o o M Z LL H U p N m vl � U 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update j j December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. IV IMPACT FEE CALCULATION SOUTHLAKE TEXAS A. MAXIMUM ASSESSABLE IMPACT FEE PER SERVICE UNIT This section presents the maximum assessable impact fee rate calculated for each service area. The maximum assessable impact fee is the allowable cost of the CIP for Roadway Impact Fees for the service area, divided by the growth in travel attributable to new development projected to occur within the 10 -year period. A majority of the components of this calculation have been described and presented in previous sections of this report. The purpose of this section is to document the computation for each service area and to demonstrate that the guidelines provided by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code have been addressed. Table 7 illustrates the computation of the maximum assessable impact fee computed for both Service Areas 1 and 2. Each row in the table is numbered to simplify explanation of the calculation. Line Title Description Total Vehicle -Miles of The total number of vehicle -miles added to the service area based on 1 Capacity Added by the the capacity, length, and number of lanes in each project (from CIP Appendix B — CIP Units of Supply) Total Vehicle -Miles of A measure of the amount of traffic currently using the roadway 2 Existing Demand facilities upon which capacity is being added. (from Appendix B — CIP Units of Supply) Total Vehicle -Miles of Number of vehicle -miles of travel that are not accommodated by the 3 Existing Deficiencies existing roadway system (from Appendix C — Existing Facilities Inventory) Net Amount of Vehicle- A measurement of the amount of vehicle -miles added by the CIP that 4 Miles of Capacity will not be utilized by existing demand (Line 1 — Line 2 — Line 3) Added Total Cost of the CIP The total cost of the projects within each service area (from Table 4: 5 within the Service Area 10 -Year Capital Improvements Plan with Conceptual Level Costs Opinions) Cost of Net Capacity The total CIP cost (Line 5) prorated by the ratio of Net Capacity 6 Supplied Added (Line 4) to Total Capacity Added (Line 1). [(Line 4 / Line 1) (Line 5)] Cost to Meet Existing The difference between the Total Cost of the CIP (Line 5) and the 7 Needs and Usage Cost of the Net Capacity supplied (Line 6). Provided for information purposes only. (Line 5 — Line 6) Total Vehicle -Miles of Based upon the growth projections provided in the Land Use 8 New Demand over Ten Assumptions, an estimate of the number of new vehicle -miles within Years the service area over the next ten years. (from Table 6) Percent of Capacity Based upon the growth projections provided in the Land Use 9 Added Attributable to Assumptions, an estimate of the percentage of the capacity added that New Growth can be attributed to growth in the next ten years. (from Table 6) Cost of the CIP and The result of multiplying the Cost of Net Capacity Added (Line 6) by 10 Financing Attributable the Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth, limited to to New Growth 100% (Line 9). 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 12 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE TEXAS B. PLAN FOR AWARDING THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CREDIT Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Capital Improvements Plan for Roadway Impact Fees to contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. Section 395.014 of the Code states: "(7) A plan for awarding: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (B) In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan..." The City of Southlake has determined that the maximum assessable impact fee per service unit shall be 50% of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvement plan. Therefore, the Pre - Credit Maximum Fee Per Service Unit (Line 11) is reduced by the Credit for Ad Valorem Taxes (Line 12) to obtain the Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit (Line 13). Line Title Description Pi-e- Credit Maximum Found by dividing the Cost of the CIP and Financing Attributable to 11 Fee Per Service Unit New Growth (Line 10) by the Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand Over Ten Years (Line 8). (Line 10 / Line 8) Credit for Ad Valorem A credit for the portion of ad valorem taxes projected to be generated 12 Taxes by the new service units, as per Section 395.014 of the Local Government Code. 13 Maximum Assessable Found by subtracting the credit for ad valorem taxes from the pre - Fee Per Service Unit credit maximum fee per service unit. (Line 11 + Line 12) 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 13 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Table 7. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 14 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas SERVICE AREA: A B C I TOTAL VEH -MI OF CAPACITY ADDED BY THE CIP 6,525 14,443 29,389 (FROM CIP UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B) 2 TOTAL VEH -MI OF EXISTING DEMAND 207 2,278 5,470 (FROM CIP UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B) 3 TOTAL VEH -MI OF EXISTING DEFICIENCIES 0 0 0 (FROM EXISTING FACILITIES INVENTORY, APPENDIX C) 4 NET AMOUNT OF VEH -MI OF CAPACITY ADDED 6,318 12,165 23,919 (LINE 1 - LINE 2 - LINE 3) 1; TOTAL COST OF THE CIP WITHIN SERVICE AREA $ 16,274,031 $ 24,892,494 $ 90,459,212 (FROM TABLE 4) 6 COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED $ 15,756,878 $ 20,965,968 $ 73,621,730 (LINE 4 / LINE 1) * (LINE 5) 7 COST TO MEET EXISTING NEEDS AND USAGE $ 517,153 $ 3,926,526 $ 16,837,482 (LINE 5 - LINE 6) 8 TOTAL VEH -MI OF NEW DEMAND OVER TEN YEARS 5,809 13,880 34,492 (FROM TABLE 6 and Land Use Assumptions) 9 PERCENT OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH 65.85% 58.07% 57.60% (FROM TABLE 6 and Land Use Assumptions) 10 COST OF CIP AND FINANCING ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO TEN- $ 10,375,904 $ 12,174,938 $ 42,406,116 YEAR GROWTH (LINE 6 * LINE 9) 11 PRE- CREDIT MAX FEE PER SERVICE UNIT ($ PER VEH -MI) $ 1,786 $ 877 $ 1,229 (LINE 10 /LINE 8) 12 CREDIT FOR AD VALOREM TAXES $ (893) $ (439) $ (615) 13 MAX ASSESSABLE FEE PER SERVICE UNIT ($ PER VEH -MI) $ 893 $ 438 $ 614 (LINE I I + LINE 12) 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 14 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE Texas C. SERVICE UNIT DEMAND PER UNIT OF DEVELOPMENT The roadway impact fee is determined by multiplying the impact fee rate by the number of service units projected for the proposed development. For this purpose, the City utilizes the Land Use /Vehicle -Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET), presented in Table 8. This table lists the predominant land uses that may occur within the City of Southlake. For each land use, the development unit that defines the development's magnitude with respect to transportation demand is shown. Although every possible use cannot be anticipated, the majority of uses are found in this table. If the exact use is not listed, one similar in trip - making characteristics can serve as a reasonable proxy. The individual land uses are grouped into categories, such as residential, office, commercial, industrial, and institutional. The trip rates presented for each land use is a fundamental component of the LUVMET. The trip rate is the average number of trips generated during the afternoon peak hour by each land use per development unit. The next column, if applicable to the land use, presents the number of trips to and from certain land uses reduced by pass -by trips, as previously discussed. The source of the trip generation and pass -by statistics is the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7'" Edition, the latest edition of the definitive source for trip generation data. This manual utilizes trip generation studies for a variety of land uses throughout the United States, and is the standard used by traffic engineers and transportation planners for traffic impact analysis, site design, and transportation planning. To convert vehicle trips to vehicle - miles, it is necessary to multiply trips by trip length. The adjusted trip length values are based on the Regional Origin- Destination Travel Survey performed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). The other adjustment to trip length is the 50% origin- destination reduction to avoid double counting of trips. At this stage, another important aspect of the state law is applied — the limit on transportation service unit demand. If the adjusted trip length is above four (4) miles, the maximum trip length used for calculation is reduced to four (4) miles. This reduction, as discussed previously, limits the maximum trip length to the approximate size of the service areas. The remaining column in the LUVMET shows the vehicle -miles per development unit. This number is the product of the trip rate and the maximum trip length. This number, previously referred to as the Transportation Demand Factor, is used in the impact fee estimate to compute the number of service units consumed by each land use application. The number of service units is multiplied by the impact fee rate (established by City ordinance) in order to determine the impact fee for a development. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 15 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Table S. Land Use / Vehicle -Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) Land Use Category FIT Land Use Code Uevelupment Unit 'Trip Gen Rate (PM) Pass -bs Rate Pass -by Source 'Trip Rate N'CTCOG 'trip Length (mi) Adj. For O-0 Adj. Trip Length (fail Max Trip Length (ml) Veh -Mi Per Dev -Unit PORT AND TERMINAL Truck Terminal 030 Acre 6.55 6.55 10.02 50% 5.01 4.00 26.20 INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial 110 1,000 SF GFA 0.98 0.98 10.02 50% 5.01 4.00 3.92 General Heavy Industrial 120 1,000 SP' GFA 0.68 0.68 10.02 50 °% 5.01 4.00 2.72 Industiat Park 130 1,000 SF GFA 0.86 0.86 10.02 50% 5.01 4.00 3.44 Warehousing 150 1,000 SF GFA 0.59 059 10.83 50% 5.42 4.00 2.36 Mira- Warehouse 151 1,000SFGFA 0.26 0.26 10.83 50% 5.42 4.00 1.04 RESIDENTIAL Single - Family Detached Housing 210 Dwelling Unit 1.01 Lot 17.21 50% 8.61 4.00 4.04 Apartment /Multi - Family 220 Dwelling Unit 0.62 0.62 17.21 50% 8.61 4.00 2.48 Residential Condominium I ownhome 230 Dwelling L;nit 0.52 0.52 17.21 50% 8.61 4.00 2.08 Mobile Home Park 240 Dwelling Unit 0.59 059 17.21 50 % 8.61 4.00 2.36 Assisted Living 254 Dwelling Unit 022 0.22 17.21 50% 8.61 4.00 0.88 LODGING Hotel 310 Room 0.59 0.59 6.43 50% 3.22 322 1.90 Motel / Other Lodging Facilities 320 Room 0.47 0.47 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 1.51 RECREA'I ION'AL Driv ing Range 432 Tee 1.25 1.25 6.43 50 3.22 3.22 4.02 GolfCourse 430 Acre 0.30 0.30 6.43 50 3.22 3.22 0.96 Health /Ree. Clubs and Facilities 495 1,000 SF' GFA 7.64 1 64 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 527 Ice Rink 465 1,000 SF GI -A 2.36 2.36 6.43 50% 3.22 3.2 7.59 Miniature Golf 431 Hole 0.33 0.33 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 1.06 Multiple.z Movie Theater 445 Screens 13.64 13.64 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 43.85 Racquet i Tennis Club 491 Court 3.35 3.35 6.43 50% 322 3.22 10.77 LNS'I ITUTIONAL Church 560 1,000 SF GFA 0.66 0.66 420 50% 2.10 2.10 1.39 Day Care Center 565 1.000 SF GFA 13.18 13.18 420 50% 2.10 2.10 27.68 Primary /Middle School (1-8) 522 Students 0.15 0.15 420 50% 2.10 2.10 0.32 High School (9 -12) 530 Students 0.14 0.14 4.20 50% 2.10 2.10 0.29 Ir i Community College 540 Students 0.12 0.12 4.20 50% 2.10 2.10 025 University/College 550 Students 021 0.21 420 50% 2.10 2.10 0.44 MEDICAL Clinic 630 1,000 SF GFA 5.18 5.18 7.55 50° -a 3.78 3.78 19.55 Hospital 610 Beds 1.30 1.30 7.55 50% 3.78 3.78 4.91 Nursing Home 620 Beds 022 0.22 7.55 50% 3.78 3.78 0.83 OFFICE Corporate Headquarters Building 714 1,000 SF GFA 7.40 1.40 10.92 50 ",, 5.46 4.00 5.60 General Office Building 710 1,000 SF GFA 1.49 1.49 10.92 50% 5.46 4.00 5.96 Medical /Dental Office 720 1,000 SF GFA 3.72 3.72 10.92 50% 5.46 4.00 14.88 Single Tenant Office Building 715 1,000 SF GFA 1.73 1.73 10.92 50% 5.46 4.00 6.92 Office /Business Park 750 1,000 SF GFA 1.50 150 10.92 50% 5.46 4.00 6.00 COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Care Center 942 1,000 SF GFA 3.38 40% B 2.03 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 6.53 Automobile Parts Sales 843 1,000 SF GFA 5.98 43% A 3.41 6.43 50 9 N, 3.22 3.22 10.96 Gasoline/Service Station 944 Fueling Position 13.86 42% A 8.04 120 50% 0.60 0.60 4.82 Gasoline /Service Station w/ Conv Market 945 Fueling Position 13.38 56% B 5.89 120 50% 0.60 0.60 3.53 Service Station w/ Conv Market and Car Wash 946 Fueling Position 13.33 56% A 5.87 1.20 50 0.60 0.60 3.52 New and Used Car Sales 841 1,000 SF GFA 2.64 20% B 2.11 6.43 50 3.22 3.22 6.78 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Center 941 Service Position 5.19 40% B 3.11 6.43 50% 3.22 322 10.00 Self - Service Car Wash 947 Stall 5.54 40% B 332 1.20 50% 0.60 0.60 1.99 Tire Store 848 1,000 SF GFA 5.03 28% A 3.62 6.43 50% 322 3.22 11.64 Dining Fast Food Restaurant with Drive -'I tun 934 1,000 SF GFA 34.64 50 % A 1732 4.79 50% 2.40 2.40 41.48 Fast Food Restaurant tvitlxmt Drive -Thru 933 1,000 SF GI -A 26.15 50 B 13.08 4.79 50% 2.40 2.40 3133 High Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 932 1,000 SF GFA 10.92 43 A 6.22 4.79 50% 2.40 2.40 14.90 Sit Down Restaurant 931 1,000 SF GFA 7.49 44% A 1 4.19 4.79 1 50% 2.40 1 2.40 10.04 Other Retail Free - Standing Retail Store 86 1,000 SF GFA 5.06 30% C 3.54 6.43 50% 322 3.22 11.38 Garden Center (Nursery) 817 1,000 SF GFA 3.80 30 B 2.66 6.43 50% 322 3.22 8.55 Home Improvement Superstore 862 1,000 SF GFA 2.45 30% B 1.72 6.43 50% 322 3.22 5.53 Pharmacy /Drugstore 881 1,000 SF GFA 8.62 49 A 4.40 6.43 50% 322 3.22 14.15 Shopping Center 820 1,000 SF GFA 3.75 34% A 2.48 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 7.97 Supermarket 850 1,000 SF GFA 10.45 36% A 6.69 6.43 50 3.22 3.22 21.51 Toy /Children's Superstore 864 1,000 SF GFA 4.99 30% B 3.49 6.43 50% 322 3.22 I L22 Video Rental Store 896 1,000 SF GFA 13.60 50% B 6.80 6.43 50% 3.22 3.22 21.86 SERVICES Bank (Walk -In) 911 1,000 SF GFA 33.15 40% B 19.89 3.39 50 7.70 1.70 33.71 Bank (Drive In) 912 1,000 SF GFA 45.74 47 % A 24 24 3.39 50% 1.70 1.70 41.04 Kev to Saar -of Pas b� Rates: A:Octuber 1998 ITE Trig Generation handbook B: E timated by Kimley -Horn based on ITE rates for ai nih, categories C: ITE rate adjured upward by KHA based on logical relationship u, other categories 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 16 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE TEXAS V SAMPLE CALCULATIONS The following section details two (2) examples of maximum assessable roadway impact fee calculations. Example 1: One(1) Unit of Single - Family Housing in Service Area A Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit Step From Table 8 [Land Use — Vehicle Mile Equivalency Table] I Development Type: 1 Dwelling Unit of Single - Family Detached Housing Number of Development Units: 1 Dwelling Unit Veh -Mi Per Development Unit: 4.04 Step Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit 2 From Table 7, Line 13 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area A: $893 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh -Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit Step 3 Impact Fee = 1 * 4.04 * $893 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee $3,607.72 Example 2: 125,000 Square Foot Home Improvement Superstore in Service Area B Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit Step From Table 8 [Land Use — Vehicle Mile Equivalency Table] I Development Type: 125,000 square feet of Home Improvement Superstore Development Unit: 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area Veh -Mi Per Development Unit: 5.53 Step Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit 2 From Table 7, Line 13 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area B: $438 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh -Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit Step 3 Impact Fee = 125 * 5.53 * $438 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $302,767.50 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 17 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE Texas Example 3: 100,000 Square Foot General Office Building in Service Area C Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit Step From Table 8 [Land Use — Vehicle Mile Equivalency Table] I Development Type: 100,000 square feet of General Office Building Development Unit: 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area Veh -Mi Per Development Unit: 5.96 Step Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit 2 From Table 7, Line 13 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area C: $614 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh -Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit Step 3 Impact Fee = 100 * 5.96 * $614 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $365,944 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 18 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. VI CONCLUSION SOUTHLAKE Texas The City of Southlake has established a process to implement the assessment and collection of roadway impact fees through the adoption of an impact fee ordinance that is consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. This report establishes the maximum allowable roadway impact fee that could be assessed by the City of Southlake within each Service Area. The maximum assessable calculated in this report are as follows (from Table 7): SERVICE AREA: A B C 13 MAX ASSESSABLE FEE PER SERVICE UNIT ($ PER VEH -MI) $ 893 S 438 S 614 (LINE l I I- LINE 12) This document serves as a guide to the assessment of roadway impact fees pertaining to future development and the City's need for roadway improvements to accommodate that growth. Following the public hearing process, the City Council may establish an amount to be assessed (if any) up to the maximum established within this report and update the Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance accordingly. In conclusion, it is our opinion that the data and methodology used in this update are appropriate and consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Furthermore, the Land Use Assumptions and the proposed Capital Improvements Plan are appropriately incorporated into the process. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 19 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. APPENDICES A. OPINION OF PROJECT COST WORKSHEETS B. CIP SERVICE UNITS OF SUPPLY C. EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES INVENTORY SOUTHLAKE TEXAS 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update 20 December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Appendix A — Opinion of Project Cost Worksheets 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update December 6, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas City of Southlake - 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Capital Improvement Plan for Transportation Impact Fees Appendix A - Summary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Roadway /Intersection Improvements # Class Project Limits Cost A -1 A4D(100)(1/2) Kirkwood Blvd. (1) Tyler St. to Stockton Dr. $ 1,284,000 A -2 A4D(88) West Dove Rd. 2 SH 114 to Kirkwood Blvd. $ 369,677 A -3 A4D(88) West Dove Rd. (3) Kirkwood Blvd. to White Chapel Blvd. $ 1,302,000 A -4, C -16 A4D(88) East Dove Rd. (1) White Chapel Blvd. to Dove Creek $ 8,801,000 A -5 A4D(100) Kirkwood Blvd. (2) West Dove Rd. to North White Chapel Blvd. $ 2,778,000 A -6, C -17 A4D(88) North White Chapel Blvd. 1 East Dove Rd. to SH 114 $ 3,204,000 B -1 A3U North Pearson Ln. Florence Rd. to FM 1709 $ 4,560,000 B -2 C21-1 Watermere Dr. FM 1709 to Union Church Rd. $ 727,000 B -3 A6D Randol Mill Ave. (FM 1938) Northern city limits to FM 1709 $ 1,070,000 B -4 C21-1 Durham Ln. Shady Oaks Dr. to South White Chapel Blvd. $ 1,705,000 B -5, C -18 A4D(88) North White Chapel Blvd. (2) SH 114 to FM 1709 $ 6,529,000 B -6 A4D(88) West Dove Rd. (1) W. City Limits to SH 114 $ 4,013,000 C -1 A4D(88) East Dove Rd. (2) Dove Creek to N. Kimball Ave. $ 6,079,000 C -2 A4D(100) North Carroll Ave. (1) SH 114 to FM 1709 $ 2,971,129 C -3 A4D(100) Kirkwood Blvd. (3) North White Chapel Blvd. to East Highland St. $ 9,472,000 C -4 A4D(100) Kirkwood Blvd. 4) East Highland to North Kimball Ave. $ 8,560,000 C -5 A4D(100) Aventerra Connector SH 114 to Kirkwood Blvd. $ 1,749,000 C -6 A4D(100) Grace Ln. SH 114 to Kirkwood Blvd. $ 1,291,000 C -7 A3U East Highland St. 1 North White Chapel Blvd. to SH 114 $ 2,708,000 C -8 A3U East Highland St. 2 SH 114 to future Kirkwood Blvd. 575' east of North Carroll Ave. $ 1,930,000 C -9 C21-1 Zena Rucker Rd. Byron Nelson Pkwy. to South Carroll Ave. $ 1,056,000 C -10 A4D(88) South Carroll Ave. 1 1015' south of East Southlake Blvd. to Westmont Dr. $ 2,551,000 C -11 A4D(88)(1/2) South Carroll Ave. (2) Westmont Dr. to 290' north of Breeze Wy. $ 318,000 C -12 A4D(88) Brumlow Ave. East Continental Blvd. to 250' north of southern city limits $ 4,459,000 C -13 C2U South Village Center Dr. 705' south of East Southlake Blvd. to N. Nolan Dr. $ 2,561,000 C -14 A4D(88) North Kimball Ave. Dove Rd. to 360' north of SH 114 westbound frontage road $ 5,128,000 C -15 A4D(88) South Kimball Ave. FM 1709 to SH 26 $ 7,886,135 1 -1 Intersection Brumlow Ave. at SH 26 (complete) $ 1,269,258 1 -2 Intersection Carroll Ave. at FM 1709 (complete) $ 958,429 1 -3 Intersection W. Dove Rd. at SH 114 (complete) $ 192,496 1 -4 Intersection White Chapel Blvd. at SH 114 (complete) $ 866,478 1 -5 Intersection Peytonville and White Chapel at FM 1709 (complete) $ 3,878,948 1 -6 Intersection White Chapel Blvd. at Dove Rd. (Roundabout) $ 750,000 1 -7 Intersection White Chapel Blvd. at Continental Blvd. (Roundabout) $ 750,000 1 -8 Intersection Carroll Ave. at Dove Rd. Roundabout $ 800,000 1 -9 Intersection Continental Blvd. at Byron Nelson Pkwy. (Roundabout) $ 750.000 TOTAL $ 105,277,550 NOTE: These cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: Limits: Costing Class: Ultimate Class: Length (If): Service Area(s): Kirkwood Blvd. (1) Tyler St. to Stockton Dr A4D(1 00)(1 /2) Principal Arterial 2,105 A Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the construction of an additional two -lanes to complete a four - lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 104 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,327 cy $ 10.00 $ 43,269 204 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 6,549 sy $ 5.00 $ 32,744 304 8" Concrete Pavement 6,081 sy $ 36.00 $ 218,920 404 4" Topsoil 2,807 sy $ 5.00 $ 14,033 504 5' Concrete Sidewalk 10,525 sf $ 5.00 $ 52,625 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 1,522 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 62,391 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 423,984 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 21,199 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 63,598 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 21,199 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 148,394 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,199 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,199 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,480 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 25,439 Traffic Signalization None Anticipated $0 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 330,707 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 754,691 Construction Contingency: F 25% $ 188,673 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 944,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Name: West Dove Rd. (2) Limits: SH 114 to Kirkwood Blvd. Costing Class: A4D(88) Ultimate Class: Principal Arterial Length (If): 1,185 Service Area(s): A Description: This project consists of the City's contribution to the widening of West Dove. The project cost is based on a development agreement with Verizon. Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:J $ 369,677 NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: Limits: Costing Class: Ultimate Class: Length (If): Service Area(s): West Dove Rd. (3) Kirkwood Blvd. to White Chapel Blvd A4D(88) Principal Arterial 1,150 A Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane undivided roadway into a four -lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,664 cy $ 10.00 $ 46,639 207 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 7,156 sy $ 5.00 $ 35,778 307 8" Concrete Pavement 6,644 sy $ 36.00 $ 239,200 407 4" Topsoil 3,322 sy $ 5.00 $ 16,611 507 5' Concrete Sidewalk 11,500 sf $ 5.00 $ 57,500 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 831 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 34,086 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 429,813 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 21,491 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 64,472 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 21,491 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 150,435 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,491 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,491 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,596 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 25,789 Traffic Signalization None Anticipated $0 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 335,254 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 765,068 Construction Contingency: F 25% $ 191,267 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 957,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Name: East Dove Rd. (1) Limits: White Chapel Blvd. to Dove Creek Costing Class: A4D(88) Ultimate Class: Principal Arterial Length (If): 7,405 Service Area(s): A, C Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane undivided roadway into a four -lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Street Excavation 30,031 cy $ 10.00 $ 300,314 207 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 46,076 sy $ 5.00 $ 230,378 307 8" Concrete Pavement 42,784 sy $ 36.00 $ 1,540,240 407 4" Topsoil 21,392 sy $ 5.00 $ 106,961 507 5' Concrete Sidewalk 74,050 sf $ 5.00 $ 370,250 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 5,353 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 219,481 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,767,624 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 138,381 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 415,144 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 138,381 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 968,668 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 138,381 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 138,381 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 55,352 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 166,057 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $125,000 $ 250,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,408,747 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,176,371 Construction Contingency: 25% $ 1,294,093 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,471,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: Limits: Costing Class: Ultimate Class: Length (If): Service Area(s): Kirkwood Blvd. (2) West Dove Rd. to North White Chapel Blvd A4D(100) Principal Arterial 2,455 A Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Street Excavation 9,956 cy $ 10.00 $ 99,564 208 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 15,276 sy $ 5.00 $ 76,378 308 8" Concrete Pavement 14,184 sy $ 36.00 $ 510,640 408 4" Topsoil 10,366 sy $ 5.00 $ 51,828 508 5' Concrete Sidewalk 24,550 sf $ 5.00 $ 122,750 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 1,775 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 72,765 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 933,925 MEUMMIM Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 46,696 Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 46,696 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 326,874 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,696 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 46,696 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 18,678 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 56,035 Traffic Signalization None Anticipated $0 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 588,373 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,522,297 Construction Contingency: F 25% $ 380,574 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,903,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Name: North White Chapel Blvd. (1) Limits: East Dove Rd. to SH 114 Costing Class: A4D(88) Ultimate Class: Principal Arterial Length (If): 2,645 (excludes 580' at SH 114) Service Area(s): A, C Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane roadway into a four -lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Street Excavation 10,727 cy $ 10.00 $ 107,269 207 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 16,458 sy $ 5.00 $ 82,289 307 8" Concrete Pavement 15,282 sy $ 36.00 $ 550,160 407 4" Topsoil 7,641 sy $ 5.00 $ 38,206 507 5' Concrete Sidewalk 26,450 sf $ 5.00 $ 132,250 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 1,912 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 78,397 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 988,571 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 49,429 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 148,286 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 49,429 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 346,000 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 49,429 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 49,429 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 19,771 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 59,314 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $125,000 $ 125,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 896,085 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,884,656 Construction Contingency: 25% $ 471,164 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,356,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: Limits: Costing Class: Ultimate Class: Length (If): Service Area(s): North Pearson Ln. Florence Rd. to FM 1709 A3U Minor Arterial 5,305 B Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane roadway into a three -lane undivided minor arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Street Excavation 11,199 cy $ 10.00 $ 111,994 203 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 22,399 sy $ 5.00 $ 111,994 303 8" Concrete Pavement 22,399 sy $ 36.00 $ 806,360 403 4" Topsoil 14,147 sy $ 5.00 $ 70,733 503 5' Concrete Sidewalk 53,050 sf $ 5.00 $ 265,250 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 0 1 sy I $ 41.00 1 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,366,332 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 68,317 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 204,950 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 68,317 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 478,216 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 68,317 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 68,317 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 27,327 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 81,980 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $125,000 $ 250,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,315,739 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,682,071 Construction Contingency: 25% $ 670,518 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,353,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: Limits: Costing Class: Ultimate Class: Length (If): Service Area(s): Watermere Dr. FM 1709 to Union Church Rd C2U Collector 1,100 B Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the construction of a new two -lane divided collector (south section). This project also includes the City's contribution to the construction of 1,650 LF of a new two -lane undivided collector (north section) by a developer. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Road No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 1,711 cy $ 10.00 $ 17,111 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 3,422 sy $ 5.00 $ 17,111 301 6" Concrete Pavement 3,422 sy $ 30.00 $ 102,667 401 4" Topsoil 2,689 sy $ 5.00 $ 13,444 501 5' Concrete Sidewalk 11,000 sf $ 5.00 $ 55,000 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 0 1 sy I $ 41.00 1 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 205,333 . b , .... .. 7 -...: �..: p. a. • • • ' Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 10,267 Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 10,267 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 71,867 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,267 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 10,267 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 4,107 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 12,320 Traffic Signalization None Anticipated $0 $ - 1 Other: lCity Contribution to North Section $62,954 $ 62,954 Allowance Subtotal: $ 192,314 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 397,648 Construction Contingency: F 25% $ 99,412 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 498,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Name: Randol Mill Ave. (FM 1938) Limits: Northern city limits to FM 1709 Impact Fee Class: A61D Ultimate Class: Principal Arterial Length (If): 10,390 Service Area(s): B Description: This project consists of the City's contribution to the widening of Randol Mill Ave., including $410,000 for ROW and utilities and $660,000 for the FM 1709 intersection. Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:J $ 1,070,000 NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Name: Durham Ln. Limits: Shady Oaks Dr. to South White Chapel Blvd. Impact Fee Class: C2U Ultimate Class: Collector Length (If): 2,660 Service Area(s): B Description: This project consists of the construction of a new two -lane undivided collector. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,138 cy $ 10.00 $ 41,378 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 8,276 sy $ 5.00 $ 41,378 301 6" Concrete Pavement 8,276 sy $ 30.00 $ 248,267 401 4" Topsoil 6,502 sy $ 5.00 $ 32,511 501 5' Concrete Sidewalk 26,600 sf $ 5.00 $ 133,000 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 0 1 sy I $ 41.00 1 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 496,533 MEUMMIM Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 24,827 Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 24,827 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 173,787 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,827 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 24,827 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 9,931 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 29,792 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $125,000 $ 125,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 437,816 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 934,349 Construction Contingency: 25% $ 233,587 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,168,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Name: North White Chapel Blvd. (2) Limits: SH 114 to FM 1709 Impact Fee Class: A4D(88) Ultimate Class: Principal Arterial Length (If): 7,165 Service Area(s): B, C Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane undivided roadway into a four -lane divided principal arterial. This project will include a contribution from Tarrant No. County. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Street Excavation 29,058 cy $ 10.00 $ 290,581 207 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 44,582 sy $ 5.00 $ 222,911 307 8" Concrete Pavement 41,398 sy $ 36.00 $ 1,490,320 407 4" Topsoil 20,699 sy $ 5.00 $ 103,494 507 5' Concrete Sidewalk 71,650 sf $ 5.00 $ 358,250 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 5,180 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 212,368 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,677,924 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 133,896 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 401,689 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 133,896 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 937,273 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 133,896 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 133,896 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 53,558 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 160,675 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $125,000 $ 250,000 Other: lTarrant County Contribution - $2,000,000 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,338,781 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,016,704 Construction Contingency: 25% $ 1,254,176 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,271,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (If): Service Area(s): West Dove Rd. (1) W. City Limits to SH 114 A4D(88) Principal Arterial 3,360 B Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane undivided roadway into a four -lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Street Excavation 13,627 cy $ 10.00 $ 136,267 207 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 20,907 sy $ 5.00 $ 104,533 307 8" Concrete Pavement 19,413 sy $ 36.00 $ 698,880 407 4" Topsoil 9,707 sy $ 5.00 $ 48,533 507 5' Concrete Sidewalk 33,600 sf $ 5.00 $ 168,000 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 2,429 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 99,589 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,255,802 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 62,790 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 188,370 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 62,790 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 439,531 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 62,790 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 62,790 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 25,116 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 75,348 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $125,000 $ 125,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,104,526 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,360,328 Construction Contingency: 25% $ 590,082 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 2,951,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (If): Service Area(s): East Dove Rd. (2) Dove Creek to N. Kimball Ave A4D(88) Principal Arterial 4,435 C Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane undivided roadway into a four -lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Street Excavation 17,986 cy $ 10.00 $ 179,864 207 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 27,596 sy $ 5.00 $ 137,978 307 8" Concrete Pavement 25,624 sy $ 36.00 $ 922,480 407 4" Topsoil 12,812 sy $ 5.00 $ 64,061 507 5' Concrete Sidewalk 44,350 sf $ 5.00 $ 221,750 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 3,206 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 131,452 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,657,584 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 82,879 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 248,638 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 82,879 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 580,155 Special Drainage Structures Crosses Dove Creek $500,000 $ 500,000 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 82,879 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 82,879 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 33,152 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 99,455 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $125,000 $ 125,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,917,916 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 3,575,500 Construction Contingency: 25% $ 893,875 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 4,470,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: Limits: Costing Class: Ultimate Class: Length (If): Service Area(s): North Carroll Ave. (1) SH 114 to FM 1709 A4D(100) Principal Arterial 3,270 C Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consisted of the widening of North Carroll Avenue to a four -lane divided facility. This project cost is based on several previously completed City projects (504- 999- 5993.73, 7000 -99- 5993.73, 03R03 -0001, and 04R03- 0001). Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:J $ 2,971,129 NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Name: Kirkwood Blvd. (3) Limits: North White Chapel Blvd. to East Highland St. Impact Fee Class: A4D(100) Ultimate Class: Principal Arterial Length (If): 7,160 Service Area(s): C Description: This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Street Excavation 29,038 cy $ 10.00 $ 290,378 208 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 44,551 sy $ 5.00 $ 222,756 308 8" Concrete Pavement 41,369 sy $ 36.00 $ 1,489,280 408 4" Topsoil 30,231 sy $ 5.00 $ 151,156 508 5' Concrete Sidewalk 71,600 sf $ 5.00 $ 358,000 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 5,176 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 212,219 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,723,788 MEUMMIM Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 136,189 Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 136,189 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 953,326 Special Drainage Structures Crosses Buffalo Creek and Minor Stream $500,000 $ 500,000 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 136,189 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 136,189 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 54,476 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 163,427 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $125,000 $ 250,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,465,987 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 5,189,775 Construction Contingency: 25% $ 1,297,444 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 6,488,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (If): Service Area(s): Kirkwood Blvd. (4) East Highland to North Kimball Ave A4D(100) Principal Arterial 7,160 C Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Street Excavation 29,038 cy $ 10.00 $ 290,378 208 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 44,551 sy $ 5.00 $ 222,756 308 8" Concrete Pavement 41,369 sy $ 36.00 $ 1,489,280 408 4" Topsoil 30,231 sy $ 5.00 $ 151,156 508 5' Concrete Sidewalk 71,600 sf $ 5.00 $ 358,000 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 5,176 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 212,219 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,723,788 MEUMMIM Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 136,189 Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 136,189 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 953,326 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 136,189 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 136,189 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 54,476 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 163,427 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $125,000 $ 250,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,965,987 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,689,775 Construction Contingency: 25% $ 1,172,444 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,863,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (If): Service Area(s): Aventerra Connector SH 114 to Kirkwood Blvd A4D(100) Principal Arterial 1,545 C Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided principal arterial (connects to SH 114 between North White Chapel Blvd. and North Carroll Avenue). 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Road No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,266 cy $ 10.00 $ 62,658 208 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 9,613 sy $ 5.00 $ 48,067 308 8" Concrete Pavement 8,927 sy $ 36.00 $ 321,360 408 4" Topsoil 6,523 sy $ 5.00 $ 32,617 508 5' Concrete Sidewalk 15,450 sf $ 5.00 $ 77,250 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 1,117 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 45,793 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 587,745 . b , .... .. -...: �..: p. a. • • • ' Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 29,387 Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 29,387 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 205,711 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,387 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 29,387 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 11,755 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 35,265 Traffic Signalization None Anticipated $0 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 370,279 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 958,024 Construction Contingency: F 25% $ 239,506 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,198,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (If): Service Area(s): Grace Ln. SH 114 to Kirkwood Blvd A4D(100) Principal Arterial 1,140 C Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the construction of a new four -lane divided principal arterial (connects to SH 114 between North Carroll Avenue and North Kimball Avenue). 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Road No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 108 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,623 cy $ 10.00 $ 46,233 208 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 7,093 sy $ 5.00 $ 35,467 308 8" Concrete Pavement 6,587 sy $ 36.00 $ 237,120 408 4" Topsoil 4,813 sy $ 5.00 $ 24,067 508 5' Concrete Sidewalk 11,400 sf $ 5.00 $ 57,000 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 824 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 33,789 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 433,676 . b , .... .. -...: �..: p. a. • • • ' Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 21,684 Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 21,684 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 151,787 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,684 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 21,684 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 8,674 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 26,021 Traffic Signalization None Anticipated $0 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 273,216 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 706,892 Construction Contingency: F 25% $ 176,723 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 884,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Name: East Highland St. (1) Limits: North White Chapel Blvd. to SH 114 Impact Fee Class: A3U Ultimate Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 3,200 Service Area(s): C Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane undivided roadway into a three -lane undivided minor arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,756 cy $ 10.00 $ 67,556 203 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 13,511 sy $ 5.00 $ 67,556 303 8" Concrete Pavement 13,511 sy $ 36.00 $ 486,400 403 4" Topsoil 8,533 sy $ 5.00 $ 42,667 503 5' Concrete Sidewalk 32,000 sf $ 5.00 $ 160,000 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 0 1 sy I $ 41.00 1 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 824,178 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 41,209 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 123,627 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 41,209 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 288,462 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,209 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 41,209 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,484 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 49,451 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $125,000 $ 125,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 767,859 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,592,036 Construction Contingency: 25% $ 398,009 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,991,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated: 11/30/2007 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information: Project No. C-8 Name: East Highland St. (2) Limits: SH 114 to future Kirkwood Blvd. (575' east of North Carroll Ave.) Impact Fee Class: A3U Ultimate Class: Minor Arterial Length (If): 2,475 Service Area(s): C Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane undivided roadway into a three -lane undivided minor arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 103 Unclassified Street Excavation 5,225 cy $ 10.00 $ 52,250 203 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 10,450 sy $ 5.00 $ 52,250 303 8" Concrete Pavement 10,450 sy $ 36.00 $ 376,200 403 4" Topsoil 6,600 sy $ 5.00 $ 33,000 503 5' Concrete Sidewalk 24,750 sf $ 5.00 $ 123,750 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 0 1 sy I $ 41.00 1 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 637,450 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 31,873 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 95,618 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 31,873 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 223,108 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,873 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 31,873 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 12,749 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 38,247 Traffic Signalization None Anticipated $0 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 497,211 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,134,661 Construction Contingency: F 25% $ 283,665 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,419,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Name: Zena Rucker Rd. Limits: Byron Nelson Pkwy. to South Carroll Ave. Impact Fee Class: C2U Ultimate Class: Collector Length (If): 1,900 Service Area(s): C Description: This project consists of the construction of a new two -lane undivided collector. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,956 cy $ 10.00 $ 29,556 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 5,911 sy $ 5.00 $ 29,556 301 6" Concrete Pavement 5,911 sy $ 30.00 $ 177,333 401 4" Topsoil 4,644 sy $ 5.00 $ 23,222 501 5' Concrete Sidewalk 19,000 sf $ 5.00 $ 95,000 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 0 1 sy I $ 41.00 1 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 354,667 MEUMMIM Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 17,733 Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 17,733 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 124,133 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,733 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 17,733 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 7,093 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 21,280 Traffic Signalization None Anticipated $0 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 223,440 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 578,107 Construction Contingency: F 25% $ 144,527 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 723,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Name: South Carroll Ave. (1) Limits: 1015' south of East Southlake Blvd. to Westmont Dr. Impact Fee Class: A4D(88) Ultimate Class: Principal Arterial Length (If): 2,255 Service Area(s): C Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane roadway into a four -lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Street Excavation 9,145 cy $ 10.00 $ 91,453 207 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 14,031 sy $ 5.00 $ 70,156 307 8" Concrete Pavement 13,029 sy $ 36.00 $ 469,040 407 4" Topsoil 6,514 sy $ 5.00 $ 32,572 507 5' Concrete Sidewalk 22,550 sf $ 5.00 $ 112,750 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 1,630 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 66,837 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 842,808 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 42,140 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 126,421 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 42,140 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 294,983 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,140 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 42,140 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 16,856 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 50,568 Traffic Signalization None Anticipated $0 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 657,390 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,500,198 Construction Contingency: F 25% $ 375,049 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,876,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: Limits: Impact Fee Class: Ultimate Class: Length (If): Service Area(s): South Carroll Ave. (2) Westmont Dr. to 290' north of Breeze Wy. A4D(88)(1/2) Principal Arterial 520 (excludes 490' at La Paloma Ct.) C Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane roadway into a four -lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 106 Unclassified Street Excavation 1,054 cy $ 10.00 $ 10,544 206 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 1,618 sy $ 5.00 $ 8,089 306 8" Concrete Pavement 1,502 sy $ 36.00 $ 54,080 406 4" Topsoil 751 sy $ 5.00 $ 3,756 506 5' Concrete Sidewalk 2,600 sf $ 5.00 $ 13,000 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 376 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 15,413 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 104,881 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 5,244 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 15,732 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 5,244 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 36,709 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 5,244 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 5,244 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 2,098 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 6,293 Traffic Signalization None Anticipated $0 $ - Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 81,808 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 186,689 Construction Contingency: F 25% $ 46,672 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 234,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Name: Brumlow Ave. Limits: East Continental Blvd. to 250' north of southern city limits Impact Fee Class: A4D(88) Ultimate Class: Principal Arterial Length (If): 3,755 Service Area(s): C Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane undivided roadway into a four -lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Street Excavation 15,229 cy $ 10.00 $ 152,286 207 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 23,364 sy $ 5.00 $ 116,822 307 8" Concrete Pavement 21,696 sy $ 36.00 $ 781,040 407 4" Topsoil 10,848 sy $ 5.00 $ 54,239 507 5' Concrete Sidewalk 37,550 sf $ 5.00 $ 187,750 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 2,715 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 111,297 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 1,403,434 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 70,172 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 21 0,51 5 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 70,172 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 491,202 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 70,172 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 70,172 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 28,069 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 84,206 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $125,000 $ 125,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,219,678 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,623,112 Construction Contingency: 25% $ 655,778 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 3,279,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Name: South Village Center Dr. Limits: 705' south of East Southlake Blvd. to N. Nolan Dr. Impact Fee Class: C2U Ultimate Class: Collector Length (If): 4,200 Service Area(s): C Description: This project consists of the construction of a new two -lane undivided collector. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 101 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,533 cy $ 10.00 $ 65,333 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 13,067 sy $ 5.00 $ 65,333 301 6" Concrete Pavement 13,067 sy $ 30.00 $ 392,000 401 4" Topsoil 10,267 sy $ 5.00 $ 51,333 501 5' Concrete Sidewalk 42,000 sf $ 5.00 $ 210,000 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 0 1 sy I $ 41.00 1 $ - Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 784,000 MEUMMIM Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 39,200 Traffic Control None Anticipated 0% $ - Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 39,200 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 274,400 Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0% $ - 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 39,200 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 39,200 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 15,680 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 47,040 Traffic Signalization Assume Signal per Half Mile $125,000 $ 125,000 Other: $0 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 618,920 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 1,402,920 Construction Contingency: 25% $ 350,730 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 1,754,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: North Kimball Ave. Limits: Dove Rd. to 360' north of SH 114 westbound frontage road Impact Fee Class: A4D(88) Ultimate Class: Principal Arterial Length (If): 5,700 Service Area(s): C Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the widening of an existing two -lane undivided roadway into a four -lane divided principal arterial. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. Roadway No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 107 Unclassified Street Excavation 23,117 cy $ 10.00 $ 231,167 207 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 27 # /sy) 35,467 sy $ 5.00 $ 177,333 307 8" Concrete Pavement 32,933 sy $ 36.00 $ 1,185,600 407 4" Topsoil 16,467 sy $ 5.00 $ 82,333 507 5' Concrete Sidewalk 57,000 sf $ 5.00 $ 285,000 601 ITurn Lanes and Median Openings 1 4,121 1 sy 1 $ 41.00 1 $ 168,946 Paving Construction Cost Subtotal: $ 2,130,379 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Prep ROW 5% $ 106,519 1 Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 15% $ 319,557 Pavement Markings /Markers 5% $ 106,519 1 Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 35% $ 745,633 Special Drainage Structures One Major Cross Culvert Anticipated $400k $ 400,000 1 Water Minor Adjustments 5% $ 106,519 Sewer Minor Adjustments 5% $ 106,519 Landscaping (Basic) Sodding and Erosion Control 2% $ 42,608 1 Illumination Standard Ilumination System 6% $ 127,823 Traffic Signalization None Anticipated $0 $ - Other: lGrapevine Contribution (Shady to Dove) 1 $2,000,000 $ - Allowance Subtotal: $ 2,061,696 Paving and Allowance Subtotal: $ 4,192,075 Construction Contingency: F 25% $ 1,048,019 Construction Cost TOTAL: $ 5,241,000 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. City of Southlake 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Name: South Kimball Ave. Limits: FM 1709 to SH 26 Costing Class: A4D(88) Ultimate Class: Principal Arterial Length (If): 7,530 Service Area(s): C Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. updated: 11/30/2007 Description: This project consists of the City's contribution to the widening of S. Kimball Ave. to a four -lane divided facility. This project cost is based on several City projects (504 -999- 5994.73, 03R02 -0001, 03R02 -0002, 503 - 999 - 5993.46, and 504 - 999 - 5993.25). Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:J $ 7,886,135 NOTE: These planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Southlake. 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update City of Southlake, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Kimley -Horn CITY Q and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAK.E TEXAS Appendix B — CIP Service Units of Supply 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update November 30, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas w R C Q d N LL V R Q T 3 R h O O N N Y R s O cn O a T a CL 7 O r 2 d y a U U W I Io IcV > vm N m co co t� o az< W j _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O N F O U _ _ _ _ o W O N ¢ O O N II I V I of o oI I oI I oo NI m m o 0 F � U w W U d > n ¢ ¢ x x O Y M x ova I oI p Y > wo a o x a x Q co h h F U a 3 0 > F � J o m _ _ _ _ _ cD _ _ _ w d Y K n N N _ _ _ _ _ _ > a a _ IIIo II Io II Io ? >w io o no - w < 71 1� W U d > N w 0 a x O o m ov z w O W V O O Q U m m 0 0 y LL ° I O O Z N J U W > F ❑ a Q yy I I I I z� v!,N N I I I ° ° 2 2 2 2 N F I III = ro a m U o O i > �EE ❑ ` g2EO� W ❑ = � � m m o z o m« o E E U N Ym III N 2 " " -o a ❑``. o K 3 NI IN 3 ��❑ 4 0 2 2 > > ❑ ¢ FIB E a� w m U m m U x w Y w V NM;�NIII> n� mm I I I o IIIo z oQ O oID Iy y y,s3 M Oo O m U E mU a�i >k a` Y 33 w Y3 Z 3 m � N z U w m u """ti�tiMgcomo N w Q C w u c W a n � w W m fq U Z y O J H E U U O w W az< W j _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O N F O U _ _ _ _ o F O F N a O J U O F F � U w W U d > n ¢ ¢ x x O Y M > wom O N O i a x F o F U 2 Q Y K Wa o m _ _ _ _ _ cD _ _ _ > a U a _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ? U w K _ F � o° W N Yw w O � axo W U d > N z w 0 F LL U >> Q U O O Q U m m 0 0 y U o Z N J F W > F ❑ a F m E �_ a x F K � U y o o o O i > �EE ❑ ` g2EO� W 5m U Z (IJ N 2 N N m ❑``. 3 4 0 n o ❑ ¢ d� E a� U 0❑ m U m m U x w Y w n � z a ><m a a�i >k a` mmmm m m � N n w m a `K a � K a W m fq U Z 9 H y O J H E w w L) rn W c Q v c W N u V a w w W m y U Z F N Q V J H E 0 a U W of E � 3 K N � U W j _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ o azw O N O F U W_ �F a O U F O _ _ _ _ _ _ cD _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ F � W U d > N _ G ¢ i x O Y o W > F ❑ a a x F i > v a 5m x w Y w n ><m a z U w o° W N Y 21 w 0 0� a x0 z w _ LL OF U 0 0 0 0 0 0 g Q U Om O U 0 0 0 0 0 N y ° Ji y U Q °¢ °¢ ¢ °¢ °¢ °¢ ❑ °¢ °¢ °¢ °¢ °¢ °¢ — — — — — — W J y y N x U z o` y E E ❑` ° E -j F y¢ wE I a U m m o aoi J Q m > Y - -> > o t t > c K E mo m r o o pZ o aY W NfLN aNO a > �d P M , v v ' E E W y s o Y Y o o t 0 o n m= cjv3 vv3 vzw �ovN« m 'tE E� Z Nc� y�o > E ❑ N Z W N N Z N fL � 3 W n❑ 'y W N m Q mmm Q > m 0 o m E E o n n m m n m ❑L E= i 3> m m o E E -O-. o 0 t W 3 3 mC7xx ��t 25 r =❑._. .. .EZ U W m m 3 3 mU'� U Z Q z z ❑ �on� a N w w L) rn W c Q v c W N u V a w w W m y U Z F N Q V J H E 0 a U W of E � 3 K N � U Kimley -Horn CITY Q and Associates, Inc. SOUTHLAK.E TEXAS Appendix C — Existing Facilities Inventory 2007 Roadway Impact Fee Update November 30, 2007 City of Southlake, Texas ) � 2 LL )k �§ E �f »5 2) J » CD C-4 0 \/ :) gLU $ % � u \\ )o co (\ §� } \E§2ifR2k \:2& : x# �j §U 7 �k \ !§0 d\ \:; Ln §§ \§))jj \j \jjj)) � a s /\ 2ZZM ::: := y f /It(\ e 4: = :,: § s a \ \) \\ ^ !r - r 'r {§!7 %/ § k _> ) -a 5 -w )) / /ff \\ )o co (\ d Q d G7 LL (.; Q E � N � w • V O LL ti 3 o'a CD N d � Y C f0 w t N X W O cn O U W zZ =� N W Y W w a a > w 0 w � x W Q = =fain o,n ° r ° o ° �N °�in�vv° Mrmvm'n cowmvr rwin� a ac�DO w v > a > o r Y � J 2 = ri ° nN d`l V oc�o �iv`o ° o� °° Vein Nc r°Ji ° m mow��rvnc�� wwwr m mind cl ° W pco >yar in in _ �vc�i _N - m ~ x z x J 2 U ¢ C' W aY W �n . co in . ...... in ins N in .......... in N rin in��in in��in in co in .... co in in in in inm in in N N O in co in O in co in > Q a a U W � C' FFFFFFFF o o o w Q w Q J J M. V O O O r m OJ O °ro O O m m m m m r °ro N m N N N N N N OO r a W 0 >> a x N r r V M N M M M� N V V ro V V M ro a > r a cicici¢¢¢ aaaaa cicicicicici ¢¢ci¢¢cicicici¢¢¢¢¢¢cicici m W OONNOON»DDMD»»o "DNMN x ¢ 000¢ ¢¢a¢¢¢¢oo¢¢oo¢¢o¢¢0000¢¢¢¢¢¢o¢o x N O O O M V r OJ N N M W R vT .. . w V V W J 0 0 0 � O x � w J In Oin oinO`o in in in oin in Oin Oin oin ro in N o (D in W C i _ o 0 m — o o m £ > d d o 11) > di om inU oin �in�U�OV� W Uri W O mN y mma� o 0 oa-aOU a�iO s. o m. . m. s ? o. »KKKf f f > > - >f� > - >Kmm > - >� > - > - >fo co ZILJ > - >ILU W��co ❑ oo co ^ 0o m o m — 0 0 L E c> _ > N ¢' E L' L' K -- U> d d " m Y m v w U o N a a a o d L `o in m m 0 0 m L > O m N y m> a m m d LL �ZZZK U) U) Z >Z >KmmK C U) Jf�ILU W >�ZOW m m m m m v _ > m > > m m > > m m > m m m m m m MM Q Q a a a �. n n n n n n > >'> N (if (if > N N N N m N as v oin in in in in o o maa � �aaaa p ° p °0 = V O m c N N N N - a N - a. r ro ��££££ �•- m M m s o o--m N 0 0 Z Z 0 o LL �j �j �j 7 j �j K K O Z Z 0. 0 m rn 0 0 co co 0 0 co co 0 N�� 7 : fn co 0 co Z 0 0 Z Z 0 0 Z 0 0' 0 >> 7 W 0 N fl QF E � A � N o Elf N r °o U d C O. LL V 0 Q ; N fC w 0 O LL ti 3 0 v N O Y C N N X O W O cn O T U W Z Z K 2 = X U a > w w v s U2� r mvc� v rnmc� r mvn �� nv<o rn�NN nvr^i -mv^ ci x W W QY W^ a > U G o a Y � J 2a Hmrn ova Nvo � r } N F Z Ux J W aY w'O 'O oo�n > Q a a U W ? U Q S W o 0 0 K � w Q N III III III III 111 11 111111 HIM a ¢Y¢ 0J O � m � N v v m N N N m y �n v u W 0 a x� v M x W Z > > ry ryry > > ryry > > ryry > V ry > > ry ryry > > ryry ryry > > ryry V V > V ryry > > V V 7 V ryry > > ry ryry V ryry 7 > > > > > > > ryry > > ryry ryry V V N 7 X x m ° ....... Z £ w " J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 2 OZ Z W J O � IfJ V M IfJ O N V N IfJ - O Cl V �fJ N O V N _ IfJ O O O IfJ U p m z a m > m E o m 3 d 5 o m a c 5 y y U o m N ¢ d an d m a m N_ y Nm£ yy Z a v > m E-oay m ai w ¢' _ w d Q Q m a y m d¢ Q w a Y v Y Z U 'y V w J Q< w L N m Z U Y N N LL U W m (n Z Z li Z m w w w w li N w N r m (n Z m W (n Y W (n w U m (n (n a U 2 0 LL m - Z a m m - a : 5 a m m@ Q ¢ m y Q m m Y w u m Zi w V w (� a Zi U a Zi V Y a = Zi Z U Y Z Q a U Z J r y =? 6- ° rn r r w r =? (� a y �, a¢_ 3` `-' y= (� N _ o -_ ° o U y U .- y o r a .- y- w w -o m O= N Z W (n li U W i ' � Z Z J Z m I w d5 S w w (n w li N w W (n m (n Z m w W u) Y M (n W (n w m Q a a a a a a > O O O O o m m m m m m m LL o �- LL LL LL a s O 2 ¢ ° U m ¢ m ¢ U U m ¢ m ¢¢¢ U U m m U v .. 3 3 3 m m m m m m m m m m m a m a a m m a m N N N N N N m m m m m - m m m m m m m m m -- `m `m °¢� > m > m > m > �EEEEEEE�^___� c p 'a p ' a ��aaa = ZZZUUUUU UUUUU a >wwwwZ'Y 'Y 'Y 'Y 'Y 'Y 'Y ZZ(j (j O m > " Z Z Z Z Z 5 5 (� u) w w w w w w w w w w w m m m Z Z Z 5 5 O w 5 5 W w 5 5 w w 5 o m w [� w w w w w w c w N Z Z Z Z 5 Z .. 5 Z Z y y m m �$ N H 3 °o U