Item 7E
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
January 9, 2008
ZA07-132
CASE NO:
Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Stonebridge Park
PROJECT:
REQUEST: On behalf of Stonebridge Monticello Pt. 1, Realty Capital Corporation is requesting
approval of a zoning change and concept plan from “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan
District to “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District with “O-1” Office District uses to
include limited retail uses. The plan proposes the development of three (3) buildings
totaling 21,400 square feet on three lots totaling approximately 2.70 acres.
The "S-P-2" zoning will follow the "O-1" Office District with regard to permitted uses
and development regulations with the following exceptions:
The following retail uses shall be included as permitted uses:
Day nurseries
o
Photographs, portrait or camera shops
o
Florist or gift shops
o
Shoe repair shops
o
Optical goods
o
Restaurants without drive through windows
o
Parking: An overall ratio of 1 space per 186 square feet of building area shall be
used in calculating required parking for the entire site
Screening: A six (6) foot high wrought iron fence along the north and east property
lines shall be permitted
Bufferyards: Bufferyards along interior lot lines shall not be required
Impervious Coverage: The overall site shall not exceed 65% impervious coverage;
however, individual lots shall not exceed 71% impervious coverage
The following variances are requested:
Driveway Stacking: A stacking depth of 50 feet is required for the proposed
driveways on Stonebridge Lane. The applicant is requesting stacking depths of 27
feet, 19 feet and 0 feet. (Driveway Ord. No. 634, Section 5.2.d)
Driveway Spacing: The minimum driveway spacing required is 100 feet between
driveway centerlines on a local street. The applicant is requesting a distance of
±30 feet from the northernmost drive to the off-site driveway to the north.
(Driveway Ord. No. 634, Section 5.1)
Street R.O.W.: The minimum R.O.W. width for a local commercial street is 60 feet
with a pavement width of 36 feet. The applicant is requesting a R.O.W. width of 40
feet and a pavement width of 30 feet. (Subdivision Ord. No. 483, Section 5.02.A)
Consider first reading for a zoning change and concept plan
ACTION NEEDED:
Case No.
ZA07-132
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
(D) Variance Exhibit
Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated December 28, 2007
(E)
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(G) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(H) Ordinance No. 480-548
for Commission and Council Members Only
(I) Full Size Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (748-8067)
Dennis Killough (748-8072)
Case No.
ZA07-132
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Stonebridge Monticello Pt. 1
APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation
PROPERTY SITUATION: 155 & 175 Stonebridge Lane
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Stonebridge Park Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial
CURRENT ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District
REQUESTED ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District
HISTORY: -A change of zoning to “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District was approved for
Stonebridge Park by City Council on September 18, 1996.
-City Council approved a site plan for an animal hospital on August 5, 1997 on
what is now Lot 1.
-City Council approved a preliminary plat for Stonebridge Park on October 7,
1997.
-A final plat for Lot 1 was approved by P&Z on October 23, 1997.
-P&Z approved a final plat for Lots 2 – 6 on January 22, 1998.
-A revised site plan for the animal hospital on Lot 1 was approved by City
Council on March 19, 2002.
-City Council approved a change of zoning to “S-P-2” and concept plan on May
3, 2005.
-A revised preliminary plat and plat revision were approved by City Council on
April 18, 2006.
TRANSPORTATION
Master Thoroughfare Plan
ASSESSMENT:
The Master Thoroughfare Plan does not make any recommendations for
Stonebridge Lane.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
Stonebridge Park has dedicated a street, Stonebridge Lane, which intersects
with W. Southlake Boulevard. A portion of the previously approved street is
currently being built. The applicant originally received approval for a reduced
right-of-way width of 40 feet with 10-foot utility easements on either side in lieu
of the standard right-of-way width of 60 feet for commercial streets. The
applicant is requesting to modify the alignment and continue with the reduced
right-of-way width. The proposed lots will have frontage onto Stonebridge
Lane and is proposing three driveways accessing the street.
W. Southlake Boulevard is a seven-lane, undivided thoroughfare with a
continuous, two-way, center left-turn lane. The roadway is planned to have
medians installed in the future.
May, 2006 traffic counts on W. Southlake Blvd (between Pearson Ln &
Case No. Attachment A
ZA07-132 Page 1
F.M. 1938)
24hr 15,57816,398
West Bound (WB) () East Bound (EB) ()
WB 7721,860
Peak A.M. () Peak P.M. () 5 – 6 p.m.
11:15 – 12:15 a.m.
EB 1,7341,020
Peak A.M. () Peak P.M. () 4 – 5 p.m.
6:45 – 7:45 a.m.
PATHWAYS MASTER
PLAN: According to the Master Pathways Plan, an 8-foot multi-use trail is planned
along the creek channel. The trail is shown on the adjacent site plan.
Sidewalks will be required along both sides of the street.
WATER & SEWER: The applicant has begun construction of Stonebridge Lane and has extended
water and sanitary sewer along the street to provide service to the site. The
applicant is looping the water with the existing water lines provided with the
development to the west.
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: This development will drain to the proposed Stonebridge Lane which will direct
storm water to the proposed detention pond that outfalls into the existing creek
adjacent to the site.
TREE PRESERVATION: The existing trees that are proposed to be preserved are along the eastern
boundary of the site and within the large open space area in the northern part
of the development. It is recommended that a percentage of the existing tree
cover be preserved in accordance with the percentage requirements
established by Table 2.0 in Ord. 585-C.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree Minimum percentage of the existing
cover on the entire site tree cover to be preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude
any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
Consolidated Land Use Plan Recommendations
SOUTHLAKE 2025:
The underlying land use designation is Office Commercial and Floodplain with
an optional T-1 (Transition) designation.
Site Specific Comments
The Davis Boulevard/F.M. 1938 Corridor Plan recommends the following for
this site and the adjacent properties to the west and east (from the western
boundary of Stonebridge to F.M. 1938 on the east):
Encourage lower intensity office and/or residential uses transitioning to
existing neighborhoods to the north and west.
Encourage the master planning of the entire site together.
Provide internal connectivity within the development of the entire site.
Preserve the floodplain as a natural stream corridor and as an asset to the
development of the site.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan/Southlake Pathways Plan
Case No. Attachment A
ZA07-132 Page 2
Recommendations
Sidewalks are required along both sides of all streets.
SPIN
SPIN MEETING: On December 10, 2007, at 7:30PM, about ten (10) residents attended the
15
meeting concerning a revision to the northern portion of the previously
approved Stonebridge Park. The main questions and discussion points at this
meeting were directed to the proposed west lot and included:
The number and type of employees at the facility and the hours of the
shifts.
How this plan changes what was previously approved.
How this business compares to the Watermere senior living community
close by.
No major objections to the development were verbalized and meeting
attendees welcomed the use.
P&Z ACTION: January 3, 2008; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary
No. 3, dated December 28, 2007; removing day nursery as an acceptable use;
changing the zoning to overall 60% impervious coverage; and, granting the
requested variances.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated December 28, 2007.
N:\Community Development\MEMO\2007cases\07-132ZCP.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA07-132 Page 3
Case No. Attachment B
ZA07-132 Page 1
Previously Approved Concept Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-132 Page 1
“S-P-2” Letter
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-132 Page 2
Variance Letter
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-132 Page 3
Concept Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-132 Page 4
Conceptual Building Construction
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-132 Page 5
Tree Conservation Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA07-132 Page 6
Variance Exhibit
Proposing 6 ft tall wrought iron fencing
Driveway Spacing:
Req’d = 100 ft
Prov. = 30 ft
Driveway Stacking:
Req’d = 50 ft
Prov. = 35 ft, 35 ft & 30 ft
Street R.O.W. & Pavement Widths:
Req’d = 60 ft & 36 ft
Prov. = 40 ft & 30 ft
Case No. Attachment D
ZA07-132 Page 1
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA07-132Three12/28/07
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Concept Plan
Project Name: – Stonebridge Park
APPLICANT: Realty Capital Corporation ENGINEER: Di Sciullo & Terry, Inc.
Rian Maguire
99 Main Street, Suite 200 401-A W. Abram Street
Colleyville, TX 76034 Arlington, TX 76010
Phone: (817) 488-4200 x115 Phone: (817) 275-3361
Fax: (817) 424-2448 Fax:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/17/07AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF
CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY
QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072.
1. Provide the minimum R.O.W. width and pavement width for local commercial streets. A minimum
(A variance has been
R.O.W. width of 60 feet and a pavement width of 36 feet are required.
requested.)
2. The following changes are needed with regard to driveways and ingress/egress:
(A variance has
a. Provide the minimum stacking depth of 50 feet for each proposed drive.
been requested.)
b. Provide the minimum driveway spacing between the northernmost proposed drive and the next
(A
A minimum distance of 100 feet is required.
drive provided for the Cantex project.
variance has been requested.)
3. Label the sidewalk easements as ‘pedestrian access easements’.
* Prior to receiving a building permit, a copy of the filed shared parking, cross-access, and shared
maintenance agreement must be received by the City. The maintenance agreement should include
provisions for fire lanes and trash enclosure/use.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS
A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans/documents and conditions of
*
approval is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or before
acceptance of any other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be reviewed
and stamped “approved” by the Planning Department.
All development must comply with the City’s Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and detain all post
*
development run-off.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat Revision must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, and a site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and
building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include
but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and
Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA07-132 Page 1
* This site falls within the applicability of the residential adjacency standards as amended by Ordinance
480-CC, Section 43, Part III “Residential Adjacency Standards” as well as the Corridor Overlay Zone
regulations in Section 43, Part II. Although no review of the following issues is provided with this
concept plan, the applicant must evaluate the site for compliance prior to submittal of the site plan. A
Site Plan must be submitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council
Note that these issues are only the major areas of site plan
prior to issuance of a building permit.
review and that the applicant is responsible for compliance with all site plan requirements:
•
Masonry requirements per §43.13a, Ordinance 480, as amended and Masonry Ordinance No.
557, as amended.
•
Roof design standards per § 43.13b, Ordinance 480, as amended
•
Mechanical Equipment Screening
•
Vertical and horizontal building articulation (required on all building facades) per §43.13d,
Ordinance 480, as amended.
•
Building setback standards as per § 43.13h and as shown in exhibit 43-E, Ordinance 480, as
amended.
•
Spill-over lighting and noise per §43.13i and §43.13j, Ordinance 480, as amended.
•
Off-street parking requirements per §35, Ordinance 480, as amended. All areas intended for
vehicular use must be of an all weather surface material in accordance with the Ordinance No.
480, as amended.
•
Screening as per §39.4, Ordinance 480, as amended.
•
Interior landscaping per Landscape Ordinance No. 544.
•
Fire lanes must be approved by the City Fire Department.
Public Works – Engineering
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Approval from FEMA for the LOMR submitted with the River Oaks/Stonebridge Park development will
1.
be required prior to acceptance of the Stonebridge Park public improvements. No further building
permits and no certificates of occupancy may be issued until the public improvements are accepted
by the City.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. The proposed site plan for the adjacent property appears to alter the size and shape of the detention pond
approved with the Stonebridge Park site plan. A revised drainage study, including detention calculations
will be required for the new pond design prior construction and/or issuance of a building permit for the
adjacent development.
* There is no additional Critical Drainage Structure fee associated with this development.
* The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and
meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082
to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA07-132 Page 2
* A Developer’s Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to acceptance of the public infrastructure.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836.
* This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of
construction plans.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Tree Preservation – Landscape Administrator
The existing trees that are proposed to be preserved are along the eastern boundary of the site and within the
large open space area in the northern part of the development. It is recommended that a percentage of the
existing tree cover be preserved in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0 in
Ord. 585-C.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree Minimum percentage of the existing
cover on the entire site tree cover to be preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude
any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
Southlake 2025 – Comprehensive Plan
Consolidated Land Use Plan Recommendations
The underlying land use designation is Office Commercial and Floodplain with an optional T-1 (Transition)
designation.
Site Specific Comments
The Davis Boulevard/F.M. 1938 Corridor Plan recommends the following for this site and the adjacent
properties to the west and east (from the western boundary of Stonebridge to F.M. 1938 on the east):
Encourage lower intensity office and/or residential uses transitioning to existing neighborhoods to
the north and west.
Encourage the master planning of the entire site together.
Provide internal connectivity within the development of the entire site.
Preserve the floodplain as a natural stream corridor and as an asset to the development of the
site.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan/Southlake Pathways Plan Recommendations
Sidewalks are required along both sides of all streets.
Environmental Resource Protection Recommendations
A portion of this site is designated as “Open Space/Tree Cover to be preserved” on the Environmental
Resource Protection Map, as shown below. Trees should be preserved to the maximum extent feasible,
The applicant has indicated that A Tree Conservation
particularly in the recommended preservation area.
Plan will be provided at the site plan stage.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA07-132 Page 3
Surrounding Property Owners
Stonebridge Park
SPO Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage
#
1. Low Density Residential
Realty Capital River Oaks LTD SP2 0.92246327
2. Low Density Residential
Realty Capital River Oaks LTD SP2 2.13660716
3. 100 Year Flood Plain
Low Density Residential
Realty Capital River Oaks LTD SP2 2.17113523
4. 100 Year Flood Plain
Low Density Residential
Realty Capital River Oaks LTD SP2 1.10169568
5. Retail Commercial
Armstrong Slake Randol Mill LP SP2 4.02002263
6. Retail Commercial
State of Texas SP2 1.03098975
7. Office Commercial
Armstrong Slake Randol Mill LP SP2 2.94707502
8. 100 Year Flood Plain
Drews Realty Group SP2 0.989
9. 100 Year Flood Plain
Daily Six Texas Inc SP1 0.491
10. Retail Commercial
100 Year Flood Plain
Wendys International Inc C2 0.751
11. Retail Commercial
Stanley Crossing Lp C2 1.341
12. 100 Year Flood Plain
Southlake Crossing Ani Clinic C3 0.75665560
13. Public/Semi-Public
Southlake Church Of Christ CS 9.817
14. Low Density Residential
Hallmark, Clara Maye Est SF1-A 1.284
15. 100 Year Flood Plain
N T V M G Llp SP2 0.77071781
16. 100 Year Flood Plain
Retail Commercial
Office Commercial
Stonebridge Monticello Pt Ltd SP2 1.36425242
17. Office Commercial
Stonebridge Monticello Pt Ltd SP2 3.19762951
18. Office Commercial
Stonebridge Monticello Pt Ltd SP2 1.526
19. Office Commercial
100 Year Flood Plain
Stonebridge Monticello Pt Ltd SP2 2.113
Case No. Attachment F
ZA07-132 Page 1
20. 100 Year Flood Plain
Retail Commercial
Office Commercial
Southlake Stonebridge Park SP2 3.828
21. Low Density Residential
Garner, Robert Etux Billie SF1-A 3.28459301
22. 100 Year Flood Plain
Low Density Residential
Kellar, Paula SF1-A 2.375
23. Office Commercial
100 Year Flood Plain
Lam, Conner AG 2.55
Case No. Attachment F
ZA07-132 Page 2
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Stonebridge Park
Notices Sent: Twenty-three (23).
Responses Received: Zero (0).
Case No. Attachment G
ZA07-132 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-548
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2 AND
A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, STONEBRIDGE PARK ADDITION,
BEING APPROXIMATELY 2.70 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “S-P-2”
GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO “S-P-2” DETAILED SITE
PLAN DISTRICT WITH “O-1” OFFICE DISTRICT USES, AS
DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO
AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE
DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS,
the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9
of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS,
the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “S-P-2” Generalized
Site Plan District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 1
WHEREAS,
a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;
noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights
on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of
signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate
neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street
parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces,
and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the
promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of
the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of
those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 2
their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents
the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a
necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has
been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or
tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and
therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are
needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of
Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Stonebridge Park Addition, an addition to
the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in
Cabinet A, Slide 4153, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being
approximately 2.70 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A”
from “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District to “S-P-2” Detailed Site Plan District with
“O-1” Office District uses, as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following specific conditions:
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 3
1.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are
not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present
conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen
congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to
avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 4
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be
declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or
not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 5
public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if
this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section
3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of ___________, 2008.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of __________, 2008.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 6
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 7
EXHIBIT “A”
Being Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Stonebridge Park Addition, an addition to the City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 4153, Plat
Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 2.70 acres.
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 8
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 9
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 10
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 11
EXHIBIT “B”
“S-P-2” Letter
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 12
Variance Letter
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 13
Concept Plan
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 14
Conceptual Building Construction
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 15
Tree Conservation Plan
Case No. Attachment H
ZA07-132 Page 16
Variance Exhibit
Proposing 6 ft tall wrought iron fencing
Driveway Spacing:
Req’d = 100 ft
Prov. = 30 ft
Driveway Stacking:
Req’d = 50 ft
Prov. = 35 ft, 35 ft & 30 ft
Street R.O.W. & Pavement Widths:
Req’d = 60 ft & 36 ft
Prov. = 40 ft & 30 ft
Case No. Attachment H
17
ZA07-132 Page