The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 7A13 SOUTHLAKE CITY OF Department of Planning & Development Services STAFF REPORT July 15, 2010 CASE NO: ZA09 -017 PROJECT: Bethel Methodist Church of Southlake EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of Rodney Maynard of Bethel Methodist Church, Construction Concepts Corporation is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan from "SF -1A" Single - Family Residential Zoning District to "S -P -1" Detailed Site Plan District for the construction of a new church and two ancillary buildings, totaling approximately 16,877 square feet in size on 3.4 acres located on the northeast corner of Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Jellico Circle West. SPIN #11 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting for the construction of an 11,075 square foot church with a separate 1,602 square foot storage building and a future fellowship hall approximately 4,200 square feet to be built. The applicant is requesting for the S -P -1 zoning regulations to follow the general regulations of the "CS" Community Service District with the following exceptions: - Height: A maximum height of Fifty -Two Feet (52') above the finished floor to the ridge line of the roof not including steeples will be required. - Accessory Building: Accessory buildings shall be a permitted accessory uses as indicated on the site plan. - Fencing: The northern boundary is to be cedar plank on plank, 8 feet in height and the west boundary is to be 8 feet in height consisting of 6 ft. wooden fence on top of 2 -foot masonry base for drainage purposes as indicated on the Notes and Fencing Concept & Preliminary Drainage Calculations Plan sheets. - Sidewalks: The sidewalk along Jellico Circle will not be installed in attempt to preserve the trees along the eastern boundary of the site and slope situation which would make it difficult to comply with Texas Accessibility Standards. - Bufferyards: Plantings are proposed to be grouped outside of the bufferyard boundaries within the property as shown on the landscape plan to ensure preservation of existing trees. No reduction in plantings. VARIANCES The following is a variance associated with this request: Driveway Spacing: The applicant is requesting a variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634 for minimum centerline driveway spacing. The applicant is providing approximately 340 -feet of distance between the Jellico Circle West drive and the Case No. ZA09 -017 driveway onto the site to the west. Originally, this driveway was not included in the proposal but the applicant has obtained approval by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for this entrance. ACTION NEEDED: Coi ATTACHMENTS: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) STAFF CONTACT: isider 1 st Reading Zoning Change and Site Plan Approval Request Background Information Vicinity Map Plans and Support Information — Link to PowerPoint Presentation Review Summary No. 6 dated July 13, 2010 Surrounding Property Owners Map Surrounding Property Owners Responses Ordinance No. 480 -588 Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) Ken Baker (817) 748 -8067 Daniel Cortez (817) 748 -8070 Case No. ZA09 -017 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Bethel Methodist Church of Southlake APPLICANT: Construction Concepts Corporation, Bill Hood PROPERTY SITUATION: 180 & 190 Jellico Circle LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 2C26 and 2C27, J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18 LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: "SF -1A" Single - Family Residential Zoning District REQUESTED ZONING: "S -P -1" Site Plan Zoning District HISTORY: Currently, a plat showing, to combine the currently separated tracts 2C26 and 2C27 of the J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, is being processed in conjunction with this request under Planning Case ZA09 -018. The Plat Showing may be approved administratively but is subject to the approval of this zoning change & site plan application in order to establish the proposed use. SOUTHLAKE 2025 PLAN: Under the Southlake 2025 Comprehensive Plan the subject site is designated as Low Density Residential. The Low Density Residential land use designations purpose is to retain low intensity uses that include single - family residential homes, open spaces, and civic uses such as government offices, schools, churches and other related facilities. In this regard, the proposal would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. In addition, some specific issues for this site include: - Frontage on F.M. 1709; - Proposed office uses on a portion of the site (Vermillion frontage) and to the west; - Adjacent to low intensity residential uses; - Significant tree cover; - And, limited potential for low intensity residential development due to frontage along Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). I I ZTA 0F."Ia07:41 r_lII[a]0 ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan The Southlake Master Thoroughfare Plan calls for Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) to be a multi -lane TXDOT roadway requiring 130 feet of right -of- way. No additional right -of -way is required to be dedicated by these properties at this time. Case No. Attachment A ZA09 -017 Page 1 The Median Plan element of the City's Urban Design Plan designates a landscaped median along Southlake Boulevard with a break /opening and traffic signal at the Jellico Circle West intersection. The anticipated start date for the construction of the median along this portion of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) will be within the next year. Existing Area Road Conditions The proposed site has approximately 390 -feet of frontage along Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), a seven -lane TXDOT roadway with fully improved curb and gutter. There is also approximately 349 -feet of frontage along Jellico Circle where the property will take access onto. - May 2009 traffic counts on Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) between Davis Boulevard (F.M. 1938) and Pearson Lane JApril :. 16,941 s. 16,830 802 (10:45 AM -11:45 AM) 1,931 (7:OOAM - 8:OOAM) 2,107 (5:OOPM - 6:OOPM) 1,001 (2:15PM - 3:15PM) Traffic Impact VTPD AM PEAK -IN AM PEAK -OUT • . PM PEAK -IN PM PEAK -OUT VTPD PEAK IN PEAK OUT *VTPD - Vehicle Trips per Day ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PROTECTION: The Southlake 2025 Environmental TREE PRESERVATION: Case No. ZA09 -017 Resource Protection Map identifies portions of this property "Tree Cover /Open Space to be preserved where appropriate ". The applicant is proposing to preserve a majority of the trees around the perimeter of the site with the exception of a portion of the western perimeter due to drainage issues. Under the "SP -1" Zoning District there is no requirement for any amount of tree preservation. The applicant however has proposed to be preserve 37% of the trees on site. Typically, the applicant would be required to preserve at least 30% of the existing tree cover which is nearly 100 %. To Southlake Boule�ar _ -- Legend Creeks/VV@ter Bodies Tree Cover /Open Space to be preserved where appropriate Existing Tree Cover Attachment A Page 2 this extent the proposal does comply. PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN: This portion of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) is part of trail segment 26 (West Southlake Boulevard Pathway) of the Trail System Map of the Southlake 2025 Plan. As a part of this a plan there is an 8 -foot paved pathway along the north side of Southlake Boulevard which is already built. WATER & SEWER: Water: The site will be served by an existing 8 -inch water line at the southwest corner of the site. Sewer: This site will be served by an existing 8 -inch sewer line which runs along the western boundary of the property. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: There is a proposed detention pond along the western portion of the site that will serve for the sites' storm water runoff. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: August 6, 2009; Denied (5 -0). CITY COUNCIL ACTION: August 18, 2009; Tabled (6 -0) to the October 20, 2009 meeting. October 20, 2009; Tabled (7 -0) to the December 1, 2009 meeting. December 1, 2009; Tabled (7 -0) to the January 5, 2010 meeting. January 5, 2010; Tabled (6 -0) to the January 19, 2010 meeting. January 19, 2010; Tabled (6 -0) to the February 16, 2010 meeting. February 16, 2010; Tabled (7 -0) to the March 2, 2010 meeting. March 2, 2010; Tabled (7 -0) to the June 1, 2010 meeting. June 1, 2010; Tabled (7 -0) to the June 15, 2010 meeting. June 15, 2010; Tabled (6 -0) to the next regular City Council meeting. July 6, 2010; Tabled (7 -0) to the July 20, 2010 meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 6, dated July 13, 2010. N:ICommunity DevelopmenhMEMO12009casesDl7 - ZSP - Bethel Methodist Church.doc Case No. Attachment A ZA09 -017 Page 3 Vicinity Map Bethel Methodist Church of Southlake U Z O J (Y w N`AKE B�vD lFM � 7p91 g001 0 w w w Q ZA09 -017 Zone Change & Site Plan 180 and 190 Jellico Cir. N w mL, 0 26 2.5 525 1,050 Feet Case No. Attachment B ZA09 -017 Page 1 Plans and Support Information ri 1; ly 1 N N w t � �'• 1 Eye 4 + I U I I � I• I 3� I 1 OUR 1 1 1 NP o I9 0 MINIMUM o m IRS m � 1� 4 m . � I j T t] z o : I 1 I m Izn m r� � s 5m i � = � C U = S m a � "� n �� rV Z € I� >•�1 9 I , 0 MINIMUM o m m � s � I j T t] z o ' l l I 1 I m Izn m r� � s ~ b i � = I � "� n �� rV Z € I� >•�1 9 € R� � F N 6 � o Rg$ oo' ssg�z "y �' S8 WNpVM ��a a 3� pp n aRR - - -- -- _� - -- ' - - - -o -� - -- ate 9� - -� - - -- ■� ----- - - - - -- ----- I - 'i ,�2 Fo D e Z�� } d � n ~ F l I O H I w 1 qs 349. ; 0 MINIMUM o m m � s 4M�8b T t] r ' l l n a N m m r� � s I I l I O H I w 1 qs 349. ; 0 MINIMUM o m O 4M�8b ' l l N�4;? N m � s I I i � = € C Rg$ oo' ssg�z "y �' S8 WNpVM ��a a 3� pp n aRR '� ■� _ O il I l I O H I w 1 qs 349. ; •J M!-:l Case No. Attachment C ZA09 -017 Page 1 o m O ' l l 6' n N � s I I i � = •J M!-:l Case No. Attachment C ZA09 -017 Page 1 July 20, 2009 City of Southlake Planning Department 1400 Main Street, Suite 31'0 Southlake, TX 76092 Re Bethel Methodist Church of Southlake Lot 17, J.G. Allen Addition S-R -1 Zoning Document ZA09 -017 PROJECT OWNERSHIP The property is owned by the Bethel Methodist Church of Southlake. PROJECT LOCATION The project is located on Tracts 2026 and 2027 at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Jellioo Circle West and West Southlake .Boulevard. Both tracts com fined for a total of 3,402. acres .o land more or l ess. The site is aal olned on th+e.nonh by Lot 19 of Jel lico Estates (bin�tir- family residential). The west, property line is contiguous with the Vermilion Addition with .single- family residential and office uses. The church currently meets at an existing facility In Southlake on 190 S. White.Chapel. Road. ZONING & LAND USE 'The current zoning for the site is SF - 1A single Nmiiy residential. The development is m odeled after. CS Community Service District as amended in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinan.ce'for the City of Southlake. - The existing Land Use plane is for Low-Density Residential. The proposed use for the site is for the construction of an approximate 11,000 square foot facility for worship, fellowship, and education along with off- street parking. An additional 1600 square foot storage building is proposed in the first phase of construction. RMITYED USES This property shall be limited to ft permitted Uses as found -i the "C5 COMMUNITY SER\ACE ' Ricr as amended in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Southlake. The proposed use is consistent with the Religious Institutions under Section 8.2.h. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The development regulations shall comply with the CS Community Service [District, with the following exceptions' 1351 W. Euless Blvd., Suite 99, Euless, TX 76040 917 - 571 -7574 ph. 817 -571 -7584 fax T.B.P.E. Firm Registration No. 006009 Case No. Attachment C ZA09 -017 Page 2 ar. Height* The rnax rnurn height allowed shah be 52' above finished floor as measured to the ri a line of the roof The maximum height d oes not include steeples. In no case shall the height be allowed to exceed slope setback regulations from r esidential property lines. The development regulations 'i3hO Mad include the following: .. iAcce6scrV,4�W4r4g. _ d Storage Building is to be considered as a pprmifted accessory. The building is necessary+ to prevent .outside .storage of tools .. and. equip i - 4air -of the site. and for -storage of items onsidered ancillary -to Religious iinstitutions. • Fencing'-T - fencing along the north piulaerty line.-sha be in height . ." The. fence ;material shall be wood (plank on plank cedar). The proposed fencing along the west prom fy 1ine small be 6 -foot in height, The fence material shall be. a combination of mnasonry .(Z in height) and wood. (W in height) Sidewalk in an :afetrtipt to . keep the rural nature of the existing 6ingle family residenti8l ubdty ion in ;Jell 1Estar ►, the site :would propose. to eliminate time sidewalk - flk± . `Further, the ex *999 _e o nnRudinai slopes coupled with the traversu-slope of the .right -cif -way on jellica Cirete.prevent the wnstructinn of an accessible art rnplies with current TAG dards. The installation of sidewalks °along Jellico. Circle. "I muse the removal of eight (8) existing try ranging ftrsi . ' ches to ,144nches in diameter. 8ufferyardw 'tyre bu"ard landscape requirements shall be imodiified for.the site. to allow 11or• tht'grcuping `af the noeccasery plantings al ide : of tho bufferpard. t+�o reduction In pntirlg re grrirernents shall be allowed. The existing and proposed utility easements along .the north and west . property lines would be . adverse to the long term.viability of the plartttngs. The placing of shrubs and necessary irrigation system w - uld have adverse impact on almost twenty.(20) existing trees ranging in size from 7- inches to 10- -invh� rn diarrmtar. These same trees are. recommended to be preservers as shown on the Natural Resource Map of the 20125 Plan. The.necessary bufferyard plantings are to be grouped in areas to provide enhanced views of the site from the street. Please conteet Thomas Koover Engineering, LLC or Bill flood at Construction Concepts Corp (214.674.3635) ff you have any questions. S incerely; 'Thomas Wgi er Engl ring, LLC 7* Thomas L. Hoover Case No. Attachment C ZA09 -017 Page 3 Abstract: Bethel Methodist Church of Southlake History: our church began as an independent Methodist church in Irving, Tess in the mid xg6o's. It eventually affiliated with the Evangelical Methodist Church for over 20 years. In 1988, the Irving church and two others in Beaumont and Waco farmed a new denomination known as The Bethel Methodist Church. A fourth church in the San Antonia area is in the process of joining our union in 2010. Our purpose is to understand and know God as fully as possible in this life. All other endeavors including outreach, evangelism, youth camp, counseling and music ministry are subject to our stated purpose to "understand and know God." Accordingly, we place special emphasis on the teaching and preaching ministries in our church. We also maintain a simple church program which surrounds and supports our purpose. We accept as members anyone who demonstrates that they have met the basic standards of Christian belief and practice, but generally after they have attended for several months or more. Current Operations: We have 20-25 couples and families currently attending our church. Our average Sunday service is attended by 5o to Bo people. Some who attended our church in Irving found the new location impractical. We have had only a few visitors so far from Grape -dne, Southlake, Keller, HEB, NRR We have deliberately limited our marketing until settled in our permanent location. In our 43 year history, we have never had more than 250 people attending any regular service. Our weekly schedule is very simple.. We have Sunday school and Morning Worship from xo :oo A.M. to 12:0o P.M. each Sunday. We have a midweek service starting at 7:00 P.M. each Wednesday. It includes Bible study, prayer and choir practice. Because our program is simple, our traffic load is very light. Roughly half of our congregation comes for Sunday school at io :oo each Sunday morning. The otherhalf arrives between 10 :3o and il:oo for Morning Worship. While most of our people leave during the first half -hour following the end of the worship service, several stay for lunch with our youth group on the premises. On Wednesday evenings, some people come for the Bible study and leave before choir practice. Others come to Bible study late while still others come only for choir practice at 8 :0o P.M. Before and after services, there is definitely traffic in and out 0f our church, but it has never been a heavy, constant stream of cars in either direction. We recently hosted the other three churches at our annual General Conference of the Bethel Methodist Church. Traffic and parking were never a problem Thursday, Friday or Saturday. Our services are traditional and include singing, preaching and prayer. Our music is also traditional with congregational singing and a choir, accompanied by piano and organ. We maintain an attitude of respect and awe for God's presence when we are participating in our worship services. We believe God led us to Soud lake. We appreciate the stable families, high educational standards and cc,rnmunity spirit of Souddake. Although "Methodist" is part of our name, we know of no churches in Southlake, Grapevine or Keller which adhere to such early Methodist traditions while emphasizing a strong Bible message of a saving relationship with Jesus Christ. If there were such a church, we would be looking elsewhere or considering joining forces with them_ If we were to be blessed with growth beyond our proposed capacity, we would either move to a larger facility or start a new church in a new location. Case No. Attachment C ZA09 -017 Page 4 SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. N/A — case has not been formally submitted to the City PROJECT NAME: Bethel Methodist Church of Southlake SPIN DISTRICT: Citywide / SPIN # 15 MEETING DATE: January 12, 2009 MEETING LOCATION: 1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS MEETING ROOMS 3A & 36 TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Twenty -five (25) • SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Mike Terry ( #13) • APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Curtis Morton, Pastor and Brad Barton, et al (8 representatives were present) • STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Lorrie Fletcher, (817)748 -8069; Ifletcher @ci.southlake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation The property is located on the northwest corner of W_ Southlake Boulevard and Jellico Circle West. Development Details • Applicant is proposing a zoning change and concept plan to construct an 11,000 square foot church. The current zoning is SF -1A Single Family Residential District. The proposed zoning is S -P -1 Detailed Site Plan District. QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION QUESTION: What is the construction material? RESPONSE: Brick — Earth brown with buff accent QUESTION: What about the excavating and retaining wall? RESPONSE: A retaining wall is planned near the east side of the church QUESTION: Fencing? RESPONSE: Cedar plank, board on board, capped with random masonry pollisters QUESTION: Jellico West barely supports the residents; how will you support church traffic? RESPONSE: There is no other way to enter the property. TxDOT has denied access from FM 1709 due to driveway spacing. Our church is very small and the traffic will be minimal_ COMMENT: This is already a very dangerous intersection. Any additional traffic will cause problems. Case No. Attachment C ZA09 -017 Page 5 RESPONSE: We plan to inform our members and place directional signs to ensure there will only be right out turns from our property and onto FK-1 1709. QUESTION: Will there be church on Wednesday (lights? RESPONSE: Yes, we hold Bible study and choir practice on Wednesday evenings. COMMENT: The Wednesday night traffic will occur during rush hour; other churches in the area will be doing the same thing. This will cause problems. RESPONSE: We will strongly encourage people to slake right turns only. CO11MENT* You could put a gate up that would prohibit church traffic into our subdivision to ensure safety. QUESTION: How many families attend your church? RESPONSE: Fewer than three dozen QUESTION: Are there plans for a church school? RESPONSE: No QUESTION: Will you ever expand and buy the property behind this one? RESPONSE: No COMMENT: Four letters were received from residents of the Vermilion subdivision. (lets. Nora Parks presented the letters. Their concerns included lack of 8' opaque screening; property values, wrong location for a church: want to keep residential zoning: privacy', and safety. QUESTION: Why did you buy before getting approval? RESPONSE: The property owner offered a transfer from the property on Carroll. QUESTION: When he sold you the property, what did he tell you about the use? RESPONSE: He told us it was residential. however, there are many residential subdivisions that have a church on the corner. QUESTION: Why do you want to be there? It's too dangerous. RESPONSE: We want the exposure to I'M '1709. We are all concerned about safety in our neighborhoods. QUESTION: Doesn't this property require two entrances for fire safety? RESPONSE: The City can address this question. They do not require two enb They are required to sprinkle the buildings. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment C ZA09 -017 Page 6 0 SOUTHLAKE SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. ZA09 -017 PROJECT NAME: Bethel Methodist Church of Southlake SPIN DISTRICT: Citywide/ SPIN 4 11 MEETING DATE: June 14, 2010 MEETING LOCATION: 1400 MAIN STREET, SOl_1THLAKE. TEXAS rJEETING ROOMS 3A & 3B TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Thirty -two (32) • SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Vic Awtry (47), John Logan (98 alternate), Ron Evans (.z 10), Ray Tremain ( #':►) • APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Brad Barton, Church Representative, Tom Hoover. Project Engineer • STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Lorrie Fletcher. (817)748 -8069; Ifletcher a,ci.southlake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation The property is located on the northwest corner of W. Southlake Boulevard and Jellico Circle West. Development Details • Applicant is proposing a zoning change and concept plan to construct an 11,000 square foot church. The current zoning is SF-1A Single Family Residential District_ The proposed zoning is S -P -1 Detailed Site Plan District. The Applicant discussed the change from the previous SPIN meeting: TxDOT has approved a variance for driveway access from Southlake Boulevard. QUESTIONS / CONCERNS • With respect to the planned medians on 1709, will the proposed driveway be right turn only? Yes • Have you considered the driveway off of Jellico as emergency access only, with a crash gate? It is not currently in our proposal but we would consider it • Will there be a decel lane at this new entrance? u No, the decel lane is only planned for Jellico West • Where are your members from? o All over the metro -plex, however, there are currently no members from Southlake... we hope that will change with the new location Case No. Attachment C ZA09 -017 Page 7 • How will you handle parking for an event at the church? We will work with other churches in using their parking lots and shuttle people to our location • What is the total cost of this development? o Approximately 1.5 to 2 million • With such strong opposition from the residents, what is your driving force? We own this property and feel it is the right location for our church • What is your planned church activity schedule? c Sunday — 9:30 am to 12:30 pm (worship services) • Wednesday — 7 pm to 9 pm (choir and Bible study) • There are no other changes anticipated • Why are you leaving Irving? o We were unable to maintain the ministry that we wanted', the neighborhood was deteriorating • How many members do you have currently? o 70 to '100 • If you don't get this approval and move to this location, what will you do? o We have no other plans to build at a different location Summary of Concerns: • Trees • Noise • Use of Jellico Circle • Fill dirt and slope issues • This property is a part of Jellico Estates • TxDOT needs to take a closer look at the variance they approved • Overflow parking SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes', rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment C ZA09 -017 Page 8 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA09 -017 Review No.: Six Project Name: Site Plan — Bethel Methodist Church Date of Review: 07/13/2010 APPLICANT: Construction Concepts Corp. Bill Hood 2629 E. Grauwyler Rd., Irving, TX 75061 Phone: (972) 871 -8300 Fax: (972) 579 -3311 Owner: Bethel Methodist Church of Southlake Rodnev Mavnard 326 Lakeside Dr., Irving, TX 75062 Phone: (214) 704 -5741 Fax: (214) 357 -2983 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 06/22/2010 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DANIEL CORTEZ AT (817) 748 -8070. The Driveway Ordinance requires 500 -feet of distance spacing. It appears there is approximately 340 - feet of spacing between Jellico Circle West and the driveway into the church. A Variance has been requested for this requirement. Tree Conservation /Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator kmartin(a southlake.tx. us (817) 748 -8229 LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: A color Landscape Plan is required to be submitted with the City Council submitted plans. I I:7 = I aLois7 0&1 = I :I %lI I [a]0 Eels] LyiILyil = 10 1116-1 The site has approximately 95% of existing tree cover and the west and north boundaries of the property have existing trees that are recommended to be preserved as shown on the Natural Resource Map of the 2025 Plan. The applicant is proposing to preserve trees within the enlarged west and north bufferyards of the development along with other existing trees in the open areas south and east of the building. Approximately 37% of the existing tree cover is being preserved Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. The Tree Conservation Plan is subject to City Council approval for SP -1 Zoning Districts. Case No. Attachment D ZA09 -017 Page 1 Public Works / Engineering Michelle McCullough, Civil Engineer (817) 748 -8274 mmccullough(a southlake.tx. us GENERAL: A critical drainage fee may apply for this development. This fee must be paid prior to construction beginning. Please refer to the City's website for all items required when the civil construction plans are submitted. A list of items needed for final acceptance on the administrative level is also available. The Chief Inspector will provide a handout of all items that are required to be completed in order to have final walk thru by the City for the civil construction. Public Works will not sign off on a building permit until all public utilities have been constructed, tested, and approved by operations. EASEMENTS: It appears the 8" proposed water line crosses an existing 15' sanitary sewer easement and leaves the water easement for a short section. Either a dedicated water line utility should be provided or a utility easement. The existing easement is for sanitary sewer only. The water line easement should be a minimum of 15'— a portion is shown to be 10'. Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in a public easement or in the ROW. All waterlines in easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards. WATER COMMENTS: There is an existing 6 inch diameter water line located on the east side of this development. There is an existing 20 inch water line located on the south side of this development in Southlake Blvd. There is also an 8 inch existing water line located near the southwest property line of this development. The water meters must be located in an easement or right -of -way. E;�e1 0I11 Ifil ZYAM ATA =I :Kole]JiIJil =I 011 The sewer appears to be private and therefore no comments are required. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. The City uses a third party consultant to review the detention pond analysis and design. The design engineer will be required to have a survey completed of the constructed and provide a letter to the City stating that the pond has sufficient volume and freeboard as designed. 2. Label the proposed sewer service as private. The site plan refers to the orifices in the wall to function as an outlet control for the proposed detention pond. This wall will need to be designed by a licensed engineer since it is part of the drainage system. This property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction. The drainage from this development is generally to the south and southwest. The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605. Case No. Attachment D ZA09 -017 Page 2 INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 4 copies of the civil construction plans (22" X 34" full size sheets) and a completed Construction Plan Checklist as part of the first submittal for review directly to the Public Works Administration Department. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website. http:// www. cityofsouthlake. com/ PublicVVorks /engineeringdesign.asp An access permit from TxDOT is required prior to construction of a driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. A Developer's Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. A separate bond will be required for the Maintenance Bond and bound only unto the City of Southlake for a period of two years for all development projects. The Maintenance Bond cannot be tied to the Performance and Payment Bond in any way. Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836. Community Service /Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager pkao(a south lake. tx. us (817) 748 -8607 Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748 -8607 for further details. Land /park dedication requirements: Requires non - residential park dedication fees in the amount of $2400 per gross acre x 3.04 acres = $7,296.00 Pathway Comments: No comments Informational Comments No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right -of -ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Case No. Attachment D ZA09 -017 Page 3 Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA09 -017 Page 4 Surrounding Property Owners Bethel Methodist Church of Southlake 7 3 L m 0 9 U 6 0 o V 4 10 11 13 5 12 so tt'lake Boulevard lFM 1709) L 7 14 2 $ SPO # Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Response 1. Property Owner SP2 Medium Density Residential 0.06 NR 2. Property Owner SP2 Medium Density Residential 2.06 NR 3. Anderson, M L Etux Patricia B SF1 -A Low Density Residential 2.14 U 4. Howard, Julia S SF1 -A Low Density Residential 1.94 O 5. Hall, Jerry SF1 -A Low Density Residential 1.82 U 6. Goodell, William J SF1 -A Low Density Residential 2.02 F 7. Grimes, Dorinda C SF1 -A Low Density Residential 2.10 O 8. Mendez Ltd SF1 -A Medium Density Residential 1.12 NR 9. Bridges, John Etux Shelly B SF1 -A Low Density Residential 1.01 O 10. Jenson, Jarod M Etux Myka P SF1 -A Low Density Residential 1.00 O 11. Rodriguez, John P Etux Araceli SF1 -A Low Density Residential 1.00 O 12. Mds Remedies Llc 01 Low Density Residential 1.63 O 13. Bethel Meth Ch Of Southlake SF1 -A Low Density Residential 3.40 NR 14. Horn & Toad Properties AG Medium Density Residential 4.05 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Fourteen (14) Responses Received Within 200': Nine (9) - Attached Jellico Estates Residential Petition: Attached Responses Received Outside 200': Six (6) Attached Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 1 Responses Received Within 200' Notification Response Form ZA09 -017 MEETING DATE: AUGUST 6, 209 AT 6:30 PM Hail, Jerry 0161 PO Box 982005 `� 1 ,� Fort Worth Tx, 76982 xo- eo 21590 18A w PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX, EMAIL, OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted abov"rp hereby in favor of opposed to Cundecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: t \PLLir ( p Signature! Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are Case No. ZA09 -017 Date:' Date: at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. une torm per property. Attachment F Page 2 Notification Response Form ZA09 -017 MEETING DATE: AUGUST 6, 2009 AT 6:30 PM Howard, Julia S 171 Jellico Cir Southlake Tx, 76092 21590 16 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX, EMAIL, OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor. of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: v Dater Date: Printed Name(s): �uh 14cuf - -- Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Case No. ZA09 -017 Attachment F Page 3 Dear Mr. McCown, Zofz is a part of6dr neig Di6ib d "ancl as zoned` -4A. 'All'afour homes are on at least 1 acre; many homes are on 2 acres, which is what makes our neighborhood special, unique and a place I choose to raise my children. I was actually raised on Jellico circle myself from 1973 until 1984 when I moved away to attend college. My parents still live in the same home they bought here in 1973. I moved back to Jellico circle in 2004, to a house a few doors down from my parents, with the intention of staying here to help my parents as they age. Unfortunately, my parents were the ones helping me a few months later when my husband died after battling cancer. Now, my boys, ages 16 and 11, and I chosen to stay here and live in a safe, peaceful, and quite neighborhood with their Grandparents just short walk down the street. My concerns regarding the proposed zoning change are many. First and foremost is the safety issue. The large number of cars trying to get into and out of the church parking lot each Sunday morning and evening, as well as other weekly church event, will cause a back up onto Southlake Blvd. We do not have a turning lane. The traffic will be stopped . on Southlake Blvd. with oncoming traffic unable to see the back up because of a slight hill. The entrance on Jellico Circle West has always been a challenging intersection and with the addition of Watermere to our south, it is now dangerous. The increased traffic on Jellico circle will make what was once an enjoyable stroll down the street, an event that is dangerous to all adults and children that enjoy walking their dog or riding their bike. Jellico circle is an asphalt street with no curbs or sidewalks. We have deep bar ditches, for drainage purposes. These streets simply can not handle increased traffic flow. Another concern I have is the size of the project. In order to accommodate the large building and parking lot the majority of natural trees will either be removed or die within 2 years. When the trees are gone the natural noise buffer that we now enjoy will be gone. I am concerned that the value of my home and property will decrease because my property will be less desirable. I love my home and neighborhood and want to do what I can to keep it the quiet, peaceful neighborhood that it is. Thank you for all of the work you do for the city of Southlake. Sincerely, Ju ' � S. Howard 171 Jellico Circle West Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 4 01/01/2005 00 :02 8175624825 BRIDGES PAGE 02 Page 1 of 3 ZA09 -017 MFETING DATE AUGUST 6, 2009 AT 6.30 PM Bridges, John Ftux Shelly t3 111 Vermilion Ct Scuthlake 7x, 76092 445825 1 13 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAU(� MAIL, OR HAN DELIVER Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed t undecided about (circle or underline one} - the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above, Space for comments regarding your position: ,! Y a /L 2 1 /I .'l K W G b v Signature: lls �Ily Date: " 7 Additional Signature: c Date: ` / / 91 / Id Z Printed Name(s): )c �; s Must be property owner(s) whose names) are p nted at top. Otherwise contact the lanning Department. One form per property, Phone Number (optional): --EEEENNL—� Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 5 01/ 01/26 05 06:02 8175624025 BRIDGES PAGE 03 Bear P &Z members Page 2 of 3 August 3,1009 I am opposed to any 5outhlake rezoning proposal which flies in the face of the original use and intent, and which compromises the overall excellent 5outhlake density and neighborhood plans. The Bethel Methodist proposal seeks to insert a community use of a church into a private use single neighborhood that is not zoned for it and lacks the appropriate infrastucture. There is no compelling case to be made for this church to have to be built in this specific location. There is no other location in Southlake whicl►- dumps the entire load of access from a public use facility into such a small, single residential street, and now is not the time to set that precedence. There is no defensible reason to cause harm to property values of every single property on Tellico Circle, as this major rezoning would certainly do. This is a time of economic hardship which has hit the housing market especially hard. At such a critical time,.it would require some major compelling use to hit residents with a rezoning that is detrimental -to._ property values. )ellico has many owners who have lived their lives here since the 1960s, raised families, invested to improve the neighborhood, engage in the community and add value to 5outhlake_ Some children have come back as adults to buy a house. My husband Jim and I moved here a decade ago and could be considered relative newcomers! Am just passed away actually this month, died in hospice care at home... on Tellico. My four children and I plan to invest in many more years building on our precious memories here, and the practical economic investment tied up in our southiake home and property become even more critical to us. In fact, this week we art makinga $30,000 investment into Tellico, putting on a 35 year roof. Other neighbors are making similar investments, as they have all along. I hope to be there when that roof wears out. The 5outhlake master plan is known for its adherence to community values and appropriate density and land use. This enhances the pride of homeownership and high standards we have all worked hard for, many of you for many years and for which I thank you. I think this city is a credit to your fine work. As the.area SPIN representative and one -time chair of SPIN, I was proud to be a very small part of that development at one time, serving with many of you. Through the wonderful Sprouts and surrounding appropriate development near our neighborhood that many of us here worked hard for, I am convinced that it is ALWAYS worth it to wait for the right time, ALWAYS worth it to wait for the right use, and then fully embrace and invest in the excellent results. Now is the worst of all times to cause further hardship to homeowners. We are already trying hard to maintain the values and we will be hard hit with an inappropriate and selfish rezoning which pours a high car count onto a street that was never intended or designed for such use. Come visit lellico. Even though we are right off 1709 you may have never turned in, since it is such a quiet street. The entire lellico neighborhood is only one street long - the street IS the neighborhood. It is the one and only Ingress /egress, walking trail, access for neighborhoodrhildren to each other's houses, dog - walking track, and quiet access available for our homes. It was designed to be the heart of a neighborhood, a single, rural residential street. Jellico has no curbs, there are no street lights, and there are no sidewalks. Basically there is none of the infrastructure for a public -use building, There are __ bar ditches around most of it, in some places deep and irregular. Nfthbors.watkthe streets at all hours_., Walking is safe because there are rarely two cars passing at once, which is good, because there is Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 6 01/ 01/2005 00: 02 8175624825 BRIDGES PAGE 04 Page 3 of 3 nowhere to step off the road. It was not intended to service a multi - functional conduit to a bury church, with hundreds of people coming and going every Sunday for morning and evening services, and then coming back again for various mid -week services, meetings, kids activities, weddings, funerals, fellowships, and all the wonderful things that churches are designed to do in appropriate places. I like churches. I like church -goers (I are onel). But Tellico is neither an appropriate nor a responsible place for the activities of a church to be conducted with safety -to chwefrmembers, neighbors, and ` - property values. With the unsafe conditions this would impose on our neighborhood, and the damage to property values in a formerly residential only neighborhood, and with the inability to directly connect to. 17091 it should be clear that there is no feasibility to rezoning a residential neighborhood to +nciudra.. church mixed in with homes, with no other ingress and egress than the one neighborhood street. Many homes In Southlake are contiguous to 9709, including those in developments like Ginger Creek and Timberlake, and the individual homes of people such as a previous Southlake mayor. Traveling through Highland Park and University Park, one sees many homes contiguous to major streets such as Northwest Highway, Hillcrest, and even the Tollway, a common enough reality in a desirable and high - demand area. The residential use of this property must be maintaine.d,. and -the right use will be worth wafting for. As the Alliance Corridor continues to be a major economic contributor, and the Randoi Mill. north south axis is improved, the excellent location will only gain in residential value and attraction. I ask you to deny any and all approval to the Bethel Methodist Church rezoning proposal. Thank you for your untold commitment of time and service to the City of Southlake and its residents Sincerely, _Shelly Bridges 111 Vermilion Ct Southlake, TX 76092 Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 7 Aug 05 09 04 :03P 915 - ©72 -0754 P.1 N otification ■ ZA09 -017 MEETING DATE: AUGUST 6, 2009 AT 6:30 PM Rodriguez, John P Etux Araceli 103 Vermillion Ct Southlake Tx, 76092 44582B 1 15 Direct uestions and trail responses to. Citv of outhlake Plannitg & Development Services Notifica Response 1400 Main Std Ste 314 Southl ke, TX 76092 Phone (817)748 -6069 Pax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX, EMAIL, OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of o undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 'ro'Pef+'A � S w I- h n a C:A� OWL Y �e Y,e -�e re ced r Sh neck I Cu Y'e i n �i C�nG OF n; n i l r fccucc +� -�o e2 r K r 6 V ;1 Gt.�_ P. tso nG1 Y i S K.. Signature: -r & , W r"e r\ a Date: Additional Signature: Date: g --5 Printed Name(s): co� Qu Must be property owners) whose name(s) are printed ai top. Otherwise contaet the Pianni epartment. One form per property. Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 8 Notification Response Form ZA09 -017 MEETING DATE: AUGUST 6, 2009 AT 6:30 PN Anderson, M L Etux Patricia B 167 Jellico Cir Southlake Tx, 76092 91 90 15 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX, EMAIL, OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. U I n 17 y Signature: Date: D Additional Signature: 2L4' 2':lzm Date: Printed Name(s): /7//<e- 9L tij & Must be property owner(s) whose.name(s) are printed at top. Othe contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): M Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 9 Notification Response Form 17 MEETING DATE. AUGUST 0, 2009 AT 0:30 P Goodell, William J 3701 San Bar Ln Colleyville Tx, 76D34 21590 19 Page 1 of 5 Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 10 Page 2 of 5 August 4,2009 F— Sou Make PuNic HewingNofice 17 Katie L, Goodell Date 0 Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 11 Page 3 of 5 SUMMARY OF C Notes., * in 2W6, Taxes 1 i� on Lot 19 after the sale of Lm 20 and 2 1 Mike suwww a ymm P jk Bl ■ ' TAX R A 71'10, 2C 271WI 9 FEU AC 4.40 4.40 3.85 _x.85 79 3.85 3.95 3,815 232 3 Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 12 AI 1. AIM YEAR 10t 19 Ut 20 L ed 21 ZC26 2C27 1998 1003,51 141151 14103,53 3603,14 3956.82 19"S 989.66 "9-6;6 989.66 355144 3902.24 2 1157.10 1157.10 1157,10 363531 3", ?.A13 2(X)1 1159=90 1159, 1159-90 3 w-,11 1.89 2002 138149 1383.99 1393.89 4269.31 468$.38 2003 1259,03 12591B 1259,13 3955.55 4343.92 26k4 3268°66 1268,E 1268. 3985.90 4377.04 2005 1276 93 1276.93 1276.93 401 139 557 SOLD L 2(K)6 - . 203710. .3857.21 4_1 Tax Paid ! Arw in 2€05 2005 698,46 63 &46 63.46 2366.43 2366,43 Notes., * in 2W6, Taxes 1 i� on Lot 19 after the sale of Lm 20 and 2 1 Mike suwww a ymm P jk Bl ■ ' TAX R A 71'10, 2C 271WI 9 FEU AC 4.40 4.40 3.85 _x.85 79 3.85 3.95 3,815 232 3 Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 12 Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 13 Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 14 Notification Response Form ZA09 -017 MEETING DATE: AUGUST 6, 2009 AT 6:30 PM Mds Remedies Llc PO Box 92459 Southlake Tx, 76092 44582B 1 16 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX, EMAIL, OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the propert so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed. to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Additional Signature: � Date: 8 - Date: Printed Name(s): f /!l 6&e j ? Vt cf , / H Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 15 Notification` Response Form ZA09 -017 MEETING DATE: AUGUST 6, 2009 AT 6:30 PM Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): e ,, GI Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Page 1 of 3 Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 16 Page 2 of 3 August 5, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission Members City of Southlake c/o Planning & Development Services Department 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake, TX 76092 RE: Notification Response /ZA09 -017 Dear P &Z Members: I am opposed to the Bethel Methodist Church of Southlake proposal for a zoning change and to their site plan. The Bethel Methodist proposal seeks to insert a community use of a church into a private use single family neighborhood that is not zoned for it and which lacks the appropriate infrastructure. There is no compelling case to be made for this church to have to be built in this specific location. There is no other location in Southlake which dumps the entire load of access from a public use facility into such a small, single residential street, and now is not the time to set that precedence. There is no defensible reason to cause harm to property values of every single property on Jellico Circle, as this major rezoning would certainly do. This is a time of economic hardship which has.hit the housing market especially hard. At such a critical time, it would require some major compelling use to hit residents with a rezoning that is detrimental to property values. Jellico has many owners who have lived their lives here since the 1960s, raised families, invested to improve the neighborhood, engaged in the community, and added value to Southlake. 1, along with my neighbors, have made significant financial investment in our homes and property. Now is the worst of all times to cause further hardship to the Jellico Circle homeowners. All of us in this neighborhood are trying to maintain our property values and we will be hard hit with an inappropriate and selfish rezoning which creates a high volume of cars onto a street that was never intended or designed for such use. Please visit Jellico. The entire Jellico neighborhood is only one street long - the street 1S the neighborhood. It is the one and only ingress/egress, walking trail, access.for neighborhood children to each other's houses, dog - walking track, and quiet access available for our homes. It was designed to be the heart of a neighborhood, a single, rural residential street. Jellico has no curbs, there are no street lights, and there are no sidewalks. Basically there is none of the infrastructure for public -use building. There are bar ditches around most of it, in some places deep and irregular. Neighbors walk the streets at all hours. Walking is safe because there are rarely two cars passing at once, which is good, because there is nowhere to step off the road. It was not intended to service a multi - functional conduit to a busy church with hundreds of people coming and going for worship /fellowship services, mid -week Bible studies, weekly choir practice, weddings, and funerals. Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 17 Page 3 of 3 Page Two August 5, 2009 Jellico is neither an appropriate nor a responsible place for the activities of a church to be conducted with safety to church members, neighbors, and property values. With the unsafe conditions this would impose on our neighborhood, and the damage to property values in a formerly residential only neighborhood, and with the inability to directly connect to 1709, it should be clear that there is no feasibility to rezoning a residential neighborhood to include a church mixed in with homes, with no other ingress and egress than the one neighborhood street. I ask you to deny any and all approval to the Bethel Methodist Church rezoning proposal. Thank you for your commitment of time and service to the City of Southlake and its residents. Sincerely, a a Dorinda C. Grimes 166 Jellico Circle Southlake, TX 76092 Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 18 Notification 'Response Form ZA09 -017 MEETING DATE: AUGUST 6, 2009 AT 6:30 PM Signature: Additional Signature: Date:` Date: 61001 Printed Name(s): Tct rrcl I 5�Cyl____ Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise Phone Number (optional): nn 'a itnsav► intact the Planning Department. One form per property. Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 19 Jellico Estates Residential Petition: One the attached petition: Residents with in the 200' buffer: Five (5) SPO # Owner Submitted Prior Response 4. Howard, Julia S O 7. Grimes, Dorinda C O 9. Bridges, John Etux Shelly B O 10. Jenson, Jarod M Etux Myka P O 11. Rodriguez, John P Etux Araceli O Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Residents outside the 200' buffer: Twenty -Two (22) Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided Petition Attached Below (4 Pages) Case No. ZA09 -017 NR: No Response Attachment F Page 20 Owner Address Submitted Prior Response 1. Hunt Whitehead 114 Jellico Circle NR 2. Cara Acker (signed twice) 110 Jellico Circle O 3. Mark Corbett 118 Jellico Circle NR 4. Marc Summey 146 Jellico Circle NR 5. Dale Puddy 143 Jellico Circle NR 6. Sharon Nash 115 Vermillion Court NR 7. E.J. & P.A. Nash 134 Jellico Circle NR 8. Nathan Hiram & Emily Saunders 155 Jellico Circle O 9. Glenn August & Jamie Mommens 163 Jellico Circle NR 10. Nora Parks 145 Jellico Circle NR 11. Monique Schill 162 Jellico Circle O 12. Andrea J Brankin 139 Jellico Circle O 13. Sherien M 152 Jellico Circle NR 14. Pamela Truhn 144 Jellico Circle NR 15. Julie Stubbs 158 Jellico Circle O 16. Debie Douglass 156 Jellico Circle NR 17. David Visney 137 Jellico Circle NR 18. Linda & Reed Yates 135 Jellico Circle O 19. Judy & James Burkley 122 Jellico Circle NR 20. Teresa L. Campbell 130 Jellico Circle NR 21. Curtis Powell 126 Jellico Circle NR 22. Mary Grace Thoennes 119 Jellico Circle NR 23. Patrick O'Leary 115 Jellico Circle NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided Petition Attached Below (4 Pages) Case No. ZA09 -017 NR: No Response Attachment F Page 20 Page 1 of 4 e' Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 21 Page 2 of 4 Cr p Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 22 Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 23 a) CM C a) as U a) a) (A C_ Q C C- N O a) L) to s U 3 L C_ Q C N y— a) O 0 O O C' :a) Q C O O N6 E r - 00 C r �U N Co a) N W U O Cn a) O_ C L CM 0 a) O m �. O_ (D O L O_ O 03 i a) a) 3 c o a) °) c ;c IM (A U N � - p C_ C C O O N a) � in O 7 a) Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 24 Responses Received Outside 200' Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 1 Stephanie Breitbarth From: contact@cityofsouthlake.com. Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009,5:02 PM To: Lorrie Fletcher; Stephanie Breitbarth; Ken Baker Subject: Website Contact Form Request This is an automated email generated from the Contact Us page on CityOfSouthlake.com. PLEASE D® NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE! REPLY TO SENDER'S EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW! From: Name: Nathan & Emily Saunders Email Address: Comment/Question: RE: ZA 09 -017 Planning and Zoning: We. have lived on Jellico Cir since 1983. The City of Southlake has several times reinforced the desire of the residents of this street to maintain the semi -rural character of Jellico Cir. This has included variations from other subdivisions for bar ditches, original sewer installation pricing, and maintaining of the residential 1 acre zoning in long range plans and permit approvals. This is reflected . in the fact that most of the lots are maintained for horses, and large 'private ".areas separated by trees and plantings. In addition, Jellico Circle has one of the most difficult access situations in Southlake. Access is only via FM 1709. Access is restricted by sight distances and complicated by the locations several .high traffic access points on the opposite side of the street. Access is becoming increasingly difficult and will only become more so as So.uthlake continues to develop and increase traffic on FM 1709. Our argument is.that no high volume traffic activity is compatible with Jellico Circle. Currently access is limited to moments between traffic flow as restricted by lights at Pearson and Davis. It is often that a wait of several minutes or multiple light cycles is required due to increasing access points between the .lights. It is our desire to have no new access points in this area and to minimize the traffic on existing points. In addition, parking is very limited on Jellico Cir. especially in the area of the proposed development. As this church grows the access and parking problem will become very damaging to free use of existing properties and thus to the property values on Jellico Cir. We respectfully request that you. maintain existing limited use residential zoning. Sincerely Nathan Hiram and Emily Saunders Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 25 Page 2 of 2 Hiram and Emily Saunders Cir. Southlake, TX 76092 August 3, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission City of Southlake c/o Planning & Development Services Department 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: ZA 09 -017 Dear Sirs ; We have lived on Jellico Cir. since 1983. The City of Southlake has several times reinforced the desire of the residents of this street to maintain the semi- rural character of Jellico Cir. This has included variations from other subdivisions for bar ditches, original sewer. installation pricing, and maintaining of the residential 1 acre zoning in long range plans . and permit approvals. This is. reflected in ;the fact that most of the lots are maintained for horses, and large private areas separated by trees and plantings. In addition, Jellico Circle has one of the most difficult access situations in Southlake. Access is only via FM 1709. Access. is restricted by sight distances and complicated by the locations several high traffic.access points on the opposite side of the street. Access is becoming increasingly difficult and wi[l.only become more so as Southlake continues to develop and increase traffic on FM 1709. Our argument is that no high volume traffic activity is compatible with Jellico Circle. Currently access is limited to moments between traffic flow as restricted by lights at Pearson and Davis. It is often that a wait of several minutes or multiple light cycles is required due to increasing access.points between the lights. It is our desire to have no new access points in this area and to.minimize the traffic on existing access points. In addition, parking is very limited on Jellico Cir. especially in the area of the proposed development. As this church grows the access and parking problem will become very damaging to free use of existing properties and thus to the property values on Jellico Cir. We respectfully request that you maintain existing limited use residential zoning. Regards, N and 4 Emily ' Saunders Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 26 Dear P &Z Members, I don't support the e h el Methodist Ch rc ' plans to change the zoning and build a church on the corner of Jellico Circle West and Hwy 1709. There is no way that our street can support the kind of traffic that they are proposing. The amount of cars coming into and leaving Jellico, will cause a lot of inconvenience and possible traffic accident for neighbors, parishioners, and travelers on Jellico and Hwy 1709. Construction will disrupt the peacefulness of our community, and will last quite a long time, maybe a year or more since they plan to do the construction in phases. Jellico is my home, and an investment in my families future. Our children plan in the streets, ride their bicycles, and or walk to their friends houses. There are no side walks or fences in our neighborhood. We are a quite peaceful community and have been this way for as long as Southlake has been a city. We are one of the first and maybe the oldest neighborhood in Southlake. We want things to remain as they are. I am not against a church, but against what the churches construction and everyday traffic problems will cause. .Sincerely, Rob Schill 162 Jellico Cir. Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 27 g I would like to let you know that I think P &Z does a fabulous job for our community. Without the work and foresight of the Southlake City Council and it's various city Boards, Southlake would not be the peaceful, beautiful, community that it is, and one that cities from all over are trying to replicate. The careful consideration that the city has put into each development has keep this city a quality city. This is part of the reason that my family and my neighbors have moved here. We love this community and we love our neighborhood. plans to build on the corner of Jellico Cir. West and Hwy 1709 because; our street can not support the.amount of traffic it will generate, and the long term impact a busy church will have on my neighborhood. They are.proposing one enty /exit on to Jellico cir west. TXdot will not allow them to exit on to Hwy 1709. The church has proposed a 90 car parking lot. Our narrow neighborhood horse shoe shaped street can not support 90 cars entering onto and exiting off it. We have deep bar ditches and no side walks. Ninety cars entering and exiting will cause nothing short of a pile up and bottle neck for any one trying to enter or leave Jellico. We, the residents of Jellico, wont be able to leave to go to our own churches. Before and after we get a stoplight, the intersection of Jellico and 1709 will be even more dangerous than it already is. Jellico Cir west is on the down side of a hill. Cars coming over he hill have almost struck me and my neighbors from behind. The same holds true for Jellico Cir east, which has the same conditions and is on`44ind turn. Once the parishioners realize how.inconvenient and dangerous it is to exit from Jellico, they will begin to park on Vermillion Ct. at the intersections of Vermillion Ct. and 1709 there has been at least two accidents in the past year . Travelers on 1709 will be at more risk of having a wreck in front of our subdivision as well as Vermillion than they already are if they are allowed to build. The workers and residents at Watermere and the residents of Jellico have to pull out into traffic and a lot of times face each other head turning into or out of our neighborhoods. We don't have a traffic signal or caution lights currently. I have turned out onto 1709's turn lane to go east only to find that at the same time a car going west has turned into my lane and is barreling down head on. It is no ones fault. Neither one of us has prior knowledge or waming of what the other is doing. It is imposable to see someone's signal lights if they are behind another car. It is a free for all out there. it is like driving in a third world country where there are no traffic rules, and this is Southlake. The church plans to build in phases. The construction noise, traffic, workers cars, and industrial deliveries will only take away from the tranquility of our nice peaceful neighborhood. There will be an increased risk of crime. If someone were to have a heart attack, accident, or house fire it would be hard to maneuver a large fire truck or ambulance into our neighborhood especially when there is heavy church traffic. Our homes and neighborhood has been peaceful and quiet, a place where our children can run or ride their bikes up and down the street. We don't have side walks so they have no other place to walk. We hardly ever have traffic on our street, except for the occasional neighbor coming home from work. If this church goes in and they put the exit onto Jellico, traffic will increase. Our neighborhood will never be the same. Sincerly, Monique Schill Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 28 Mr. Al Morin Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission 1649 Tuscan Ridge Circle Southlake, Tx 76092 Case No. ZA09 -017 This letter is express our opposition to to the proposed church at the corner of Jellico Circle W and Southlake Blvd. We are an established neighborhood of some thirty five plus years and feel the building of the church at that intersection will not only cause more danger to an already near impossible traffic situation, but will also cause increase traffic on Jellico. Circle, our quiet horseshoe street with many children under 12. The property is zoned residential and is a part of.our subdivision and we feel.it should remain so. The corner was bad before Watermere opened and with the proposed traffic from the church it will be even more dangerous. Coming over the hill from Davis Blvd (should cars stack up to turn into Jellico) they cannot be seen until you are right upon them. It's hard enough for one turning in and one leaving as it is, and with increased traffic it will be near impossible. Our two lane street cannot sustain more traffic with its deep bar ditches, and parking will inevitably be in front of our homes for easier exiting from church services. Respectively oppose this church being built in this loc Lion, . Stoney & Juulie Stubbs 158 Jellico Circle W Attachment F Page 29 Michael Springer August 3, 2009 1400 Main St Suite 310 Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Commissioner Springer, We are writing to you to express our opposition to the proposed Bethel Methodist Church development for the northwest corner of Hwy 1709 and Jellico Circle. There are quite a number of reasons why this project should not be allowed to go forward. We will try to concentrate on the ones that seem the most serious. 1. All of Jellico Estates is zoned Single Family Residential (SF I, I believe it is called) and has been for years. This zoning was reaffirmed in the City's most recent land use plan update. The maintenance of residential zoning of this property is absolutely critical for the integrity of Jellico Estates. If this .property is allowed to re -zone then it will open the door to re- zoning the "mirror" property on the northeast corner of Jellico Circle and Hwy 1709. Such re- zoning would then open the door to the re- zoning of all of the Jellico property fronting 1709. Since regulations prohibit direct access to any of the .corner properties, all access would necessarily be via Jellico Circle. Hence, our concern about the integrity of Jellico Estates. What is now . .a peaceful, .very low- traffic, residential street would become a nightmare for our residents AND our property values would decline precipitously. Getting in and out of either side of Jellico would become highly problematic during much of the day. In addition, there would certainly be a significant increase in traffic on all of Jellico Circle due to people who inadvertently turned the wrong way on Jellico or who purposely choose to enter or exit Jellico from the end opposite their destination. 2.Jellico Estates is an old neighborhood that.is emblematic of the rural roots of our larger community. We don't have curbs and gutters — we have ditches and culverts and an asphalt road. We are very like a country lane. If any of the corner properties are allowed to change their zoning from single family to anything else, then in relatively short order (a year or two, perhaps) the entire 1709 frontage will eventually be rezoned. That will mean that.both entrances will have to be widened significantly for. several hundred feet back from 1709. Of course, this will require curb and gutter which will stand in sharp contrast to our ditches and culverts. The whole aesthetics of Jellico Estates will be severely damaged, with a commensurate loss of property value. Worse yet, our own personal enjoyment of our quiet, rural- feeling neighborhood will be destroyed. We feel that the two items above should be sufficient to reject this project. Surely, there is ample justification based on traffic congestion, access problems., parking, etc. Even so, we have one final item for your consideration. 3. This project does not pass the "smell test ". It smells fishy. Here's why: a) this is a big, expensive project, or at least it should be based on our Southlake standards. Yet, this is a very small congregation (60 -70 members ?). Even if they can somehow afford to build it, how can such a small congregation afford the upkeep. I'm sure they have an Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 30 explanation... b) during their SPIN meeting their representatives said they intended to grow their congregation significantly. Perhaps this is how they would address concern a) above. Well then, how to explain the very limited parking available in the proposed site plan? If they do significantly grow the congregation they will soon outgrow their church. What then? Will they sell it on as an office or business property? Minus the steeple the building doesn't look unmistakably like a church. Please pardon our skepticism, but we think there are other motivations and goals at work here. One last thing — you will undoubtedly be told that this property is not viable as single family residential — that no one wants to live so close to 1709. We categorically reject such claims and we have the qualifications to back that up. Linda was a realtor for many years and specialized in selling for builders. In addition, we built homes ourselves for a number of years, completing 96 homes. As the saying goes: "If you build it, they will come ". The right builder with the right product won't have any problem finding a buyer at aprice everyone can be comfortable with. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to let you know of our strong opposition to this project. We trust you will see how detrimental this project would be to Jellico Estates. Please reject it in any form. .Sincerely, Reed Yate i a Ya s 135 Jellico Circle Southlake, TX Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 31 Page 1 of 2 Dear P &Z Members August 3, 2009 I am opposed to any Southlake rezoning proposal which flies in the face of the original use and intent, and which compromises the overall excellent Southlake density and neighborhood plans. The Bethel Methodist proposal seeks to insert a community use of a church into a private use single neighborhood that is not zoned for it and lacks the appropriate infrastucture. There is no compelling case to be made for this church to have to be built in this specific location, There is no other location in Southlake which dumps the entire load of access from a public use facility into such a small, single residential street, and now is not the time to set that precedence. There is no defensible reason to cause harm to property values of every single property on Jellico Circle, as this major rezoning would certainly do. This is a time of economic hardship which has hit the housing market especially hard. At such a critical time, it would require some major compelling use to hit residents with a.rezoning that is detrimental to property values. Jellico has many owners who have lived their lives here since the 1960s, raised families, invested to improve the neighborhood, engage in the community and add value to Southlake. Some children have come back as adults to buy a house. My husband Jim and 1 moved here a decade ago and could be considered relative newcomers! Jim just passed away actually this month, died in hospice care at home... on Jellico. My four children and 1 plan to invest in many more years building on our precious memories here, and the practical economic investment tied up in our Southlake home and property become even more critical to us. In fact, this week we are making a $30,000 investment into Jellico, putting on a 35 year roof. Other neighbors are making similar investments, as they have all along. I hope to be there.when that roof wears out. The Southlake master plan is known for its adherence to community values and appropriate density and. land use. This enhances the pride of homeownership and high standards we have all worked hard for, many of.you for many years and for which I thank you. I think this city is a credit to your fine work, As the area.SPIN representative and one -time chair of SPIN, I was proud to be a very small part of that development at one time, serving with many of you. Through the wonderful Sprouts and surrounding appropriate development near our neighborhood that many of us here worked hard for, I am convinced that it is ALWAYS worth it to wait for the right time, ALWAYS worth it to wait for the right use, and then fully embrace and invest in the excellent results. 'Now is the worst of all times to cause further hardship to homeowners. We are already trying hard to maintain the values and we will be hard hit with an inappropriate and selfish rezoning which pours a high car count onto a street that was never intended or designed for such use. Come visit Jellico. Even though we are right off 1709 you may have never turned in, since it is such a quiet street. The entire Jellico neighborhood is only one street long the street IS the neighborhood. It is the one and only ingress /egress, walking trail, access for neighborhood children to each other's houses, dog - walking track, and quiet access available for our homes. It was designed to be the heart of a neighborhood, a single, rural residential street. Jellico has no curbs, there are no street lights, and there are no sidewalks. Basically there is none of the infrastructure for a public -use building. There are . bar ditches around most of it, in some places deep and irregular. Neighbors walk the streets at all hours. Walking is safe because there are rarely two cars passing at once, which is good, because there is Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 32 Page 2 of 2 nowhere to step off the road. It was not intended to service a multi - functional conduit to a busy church, with hundreds of people coming and going every Sunday for morning and evening services, and then coming back again for various mid -week services, meetings, kids activities, weddings, funerals, fellowships, and all the wonderful things that churches are designed to do in appropriate places. I like churches. I like church -goers (I are one!). But Tellico is neither an appropriate nor a responsible place for the activities of a church to be conducted with safety to church members, neighbors, and property values. With the unsafe conditions this would impose on our neighborhood, and the damage to property values in a formerly residential only neighborhood, and with the inability to directly connect to 1709, it should be clear that there is no feasibility to rezoning a residential neighborhood to include a church mixed in with homes, with no other ingress and egress than the one neighborhood street. Many homes in Southlake are contiguous to 1709, including those in developments like Ginger Creek and Timberlake, and the individual homes of people such as a previous Southlake mayor. Traveling through Highland Park and University Park, one sees many homes contiguous to major streets such as Northwest Highway, Hilicrest, and even the To!Iway, a common enough reality in a desirable and high - demand area. The residential use of this property must be maintained, and the right use will be worth waiting for. As the Alliance Corridor continues to be a major economic contributor, and the Randol Mill north south axis is improved, the excellent location will only gain in residential value and attraction. 1 ask you to deny any and all approval to the Bethel Methodist Church rezoning proposal. Thank you for your untold commitment of time and service to the City of Southlake and its residents. Sincerely, �Tdn4l Andrea J. Srankin Customer Service Call Center - Chase Wax Dept. First American Real Estate Tax Service 1 First American Way, Westlake, TX 76262 Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 33 Dear P &Z Members August 5, 2009 I am opposed to any Southlake rezoning proposal which compromises the overall excellent Southlake density and neighborhood plans. My husband and I starting planning to move to Southlake in 1992 and finally became a reality for us in 2000 and we love living here and especially because we live in one of the very best neighborhoods on Jellico. Putting Bethel Methodist Church on our street would change the entire look and feel to our neighborhood. The entire Jellico neighborhood is only one street long - the street 15 the neighborhood. Jellico is neither an appropriate nor a responsible place for the activities of a church to be conducted with safety to church members, neighbors, and property values. With the unsafe conditions this would impose on our neighborhood, and the damage to property values in a formerly residential only neighborhood, and with the inability to directly connect to 1709, it should be clear that there is no feasibility to rezoning a residential neighborhood to include a church mixed in with homes. Now is the worst of all times to cause further hardship to homeowners. We are trying hard to maintain the values and we will be hard hit with an inappropriate and selfish rezoning which pours a high car count onto a street that was never intended or designed for such use. I believe rezoning this neighborhood would be detrimental.to property values. Our home and property have become even more critical to us as we plan for the future. There is no case to be made for this church to have to be built in this specific location. There is no other location in Southlake which dumps the entire load of access from a public use facility into such a small, single residential street, and now is not the time to set that precedence. There is no defensible reason to cause harm to property values of every single property on Jellico Circle, as this major rezoning would certainly do. It would change the entire look and feel of our neighborhood not to mention the safety of having so many cars coming and going on a small residential street. We will be hard hit with an inappropriate and selfish rezoning which pours a high car count onto a street that was never intended or designed for such use. The Southlake master plan is known for its adherence to community values. This enhances the pride of homeownership and high standards. Thank you for your commitment of time and service to the City of Southlake and its residents. I ask you to deny any and all approval to the Bethel Methodist Church rezoning proposal. Sincerely, Mark & Cara Acker 110 Jellico Circle 4 Q 6� Case No. ZA09 -017 Attachment F Page 34 20 July 10, 2010 :, � 0� 01fiI SECR�ZAR`� SOUTHLAKE MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: REZONING REQUEST FOR BETHEL METHODIST CHURCH REFERENCE: Southlake City Council Public Hearing Regarding Bethel Methodist Church Request for Rezoning 3.4 Acres at the SW Corner of W. Jellico Circle and Hwy 1709. We are Mr. and Mrs. William J. Goodell, the owners of Lot 19 in Jellico Estates Subdivision in Southlake, TX. Lot 19 is on the north side of the property requesting to be rezoned and we share a 400 foot long adjacent property line with this Bethel Methodist Church property. We have previously owned Jellico Estates Subdivision Lots 20, 21 and 22, and the property currently owned by Bethel Methodist Church. Bethel Methodist purchased and owns Tracts Alb -2C26 and Al 8-2C27, Jesse G Allen Survey. These tracts are NOT part of Jellico Estates Subdivision in Southlake, TX. • My wife and I are IN FAVOR of this 3.4 acres being rezoned to allow and provide for Bethel Methodist Church. We feel a church on this property is certainly an appropriate and an excellent use for this land. It will provide a desirable and much needed buffer for the Jellico Estates Subdivision from Hwy 1709. It will also provide other desirable services for Southlake and its residents. Southlake Blvd. (Highway 1709) is a MAJOR east -west 7 lane highway and I feel that the land adjacent to such a busy highway should NOT be residential. Also, I have 2 professional opinions that state that residential use of this land is NOT the `highest and best' use for this property. The Jackson Clabom, Inc. appraisal which is dated 9 -11 -2007 presents the following statement under Highest and Best Use Summary: "The predominant land use in the area is commercial and single - family residential, yet the subject is located on a major thoroughfare. Considering all factors, the highest and best use of the subject is for future office /commercial and/or office development as Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 35 dictated by demand in accordance with the physical possibility," .... "and financially feasibility use of the site." Please note that this 3.4 acre tract of land has been valued and taxed at approximately 4 TIMES higher rate per acre than the surrounding Jellico Estates Subdivision residential property from 1998 through 2005. TAD appraisers apparently felt this property was more valuable than the surrounding residential property and it would probably be used for something rather than just residential, please see the attached SUMMARY OF JELLICO TAXES. I hired a tax professional to contest these high taxes two different years, but the TAD appraisal and assessed taxes were not reduced. Bethel Methodist Church bought this property (Tracts Alb -2C26 and Al 8-2C27) in October 2007. My wife and I have owned this land for over 40 years and THIS rezoning request is the FIRST TIME that a rezoning request has been presented to the P &Z Board and/or to the Southlake City Council during these 40 years. Many of the residents in Jellico Estates have become well known for their fighting techniques and tactics in opposing anyone in the area requesting property rezoning ,like the Target project, the office project to the east of Jellico Estates Subdivision, the proposed project toward the SE corner of Jellico Subdivision, and now they are attacking the Bethel Methodist Church zoning which is SW of Jellico Estates Subdivision. • I would like to encourage the Southlake City Council to support and approve the use of this land for the Bethel Methodist Church. I will gladly meet with you privately if you have any questions. I am currently out of state at the time of this meeting. 7 William J. Goodell Date 817- 485 -1911 Katie L. Goodell Date Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 36 SUMMARY OF JELLICO TAXES, $ Notes: * In 2006, Taxes increased by 60% on Lot 19 after the sale of Lots 20 and 21. Jellico Summary of Takes Paid (Rev B) Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 37 TAX A18TR A18TR RATIO, YEAR Lot 19 Lot 20 Lot 21 2C26 2C27 2C27/Lotl9 2.0 Ac 2.0 Ac 2.0 Ac 1.63 Ac 1.79 Ac PER ACRE 1998 1003.51 1003.51 1003.51 3603.14 3956.82 4.40 1999 989.66 989.66 989.66 3553.44 3902.24 4.40 2000 1157.10 1157.10 1157.10 3635.31 3992.13 3.85 2001 1159.90 1159.90 1159.90 3644.11 4001.89 3.85 2002 1383.89 1383.89 138189 4269.31 4688.38 3.79 2003 1259.03 1259.03 1259.03 3955.55 4343.82 3.85 2004 1268.66 1268.66 1268.66 3985.80 4377.04 3.85 2005 1276.93 1276.93 1276.93 4011.79 4405.57 3.85 SOLD SOLD 2006 2037.20 * - -- 3857.29 4235.91 2.32 EXAMPLE: Tax Paid / Acre in 2005, $ 2005 638.46 638.46 638.46 2366.43 2366.43 3.85 Notes: * In 2006, Taxes increased by 60% on Lot 19 after the sale of Lots 20 and 21. Jellico Summary of Takes Paid (Rev B) Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 37 K $IaTS ]C1 100 E. Weatherford, Fort Worth, TX 76196 Y �(817) 884 110b , T Al2itAt r Ct�ura`rY , c aii :taxoffirelPtariantcounty.com 0 ** TAX AS�ESSOIt -Ct�i �R web:vvww.tarrantcountycom . .. ' / IPT �► RE 2 t7ATlr. ' 2d2IIl 05 LEGAL: ALLEN, JESSE G SURVEY ACCOUNT: 00003716767 A 18 TR 2C26 OWNER., GOODELL. WILLIAM J PARCEL ADDRESS: 0440000 JELLICO CIR _ -�S EXEMPTIONS: PIDN: A 18 2026 ACMES: 1.68 RECEIPT #: 39970426 CHECK 1716 DEPOSIT #: 2W5122133991 -20066 ARRANTCOIjNT '- kt _T rt pS:, _ v{ �ir•Y�� s -' #. 3j'iiT -. I tp < I wo f ^� S- U ..(j: r 2005 KELLERISD $142, 005.00 1.71580 L 12128121708 $2;436.54 $O.fMI 2005 C COLLEGE $142,1!06.00 0.13938 L 1212812005 $197.93 $0.00 2005 ARRANT COUNTY $142,006:00 0.2725 L 12128121705 $386.97 $0.00 2005 �OUTHLAKE C HOSPITAL $1+42,006,00 0.235397 L 12128120175 $334.28 $4.00 2005 CITY $142,0176.00 0.462 L 12128QD05 $655.07 $0.00: AMOUNT TENDERED $4.0 1 AMOMN ID ' B I 1 �, TOTAL?MD 1011:79' 100 E. Weatherford, Fort Worth, 7 X 76196 �,.. BETSY TRICE (1317) 884 -1100 IAR1tANt CC3UId7Y e- maai l:taxoffice *tarrantcounty.com web.vvww,tarranttounty.com TAX AS3)'S,St3R- COLL,Ft,"7i0it *..:. RECEIPT 3 DATE: 9212812005 LEGAL: ALLEN, JESSE G SURVEY ACCOUNT: 00003716775 A 18 TR 2C27 OWNER: GOODELL, WILLIAM J PARCEL ADDRESS: 0000000 JEt_LICO CIR EXEMPTIONS: PION: A 18 2027 ACRES: 1.79 RECEIPT M 39970428 CHECK 1716 POSIT* 2W x12283991-2005]TARRAi TTf4dU. 4`,. 2005 OUTHLAKE CITY $155,w.00 0.46200 L 12128120105 $720.47 2005 TARRANT COUNTY $155,945.00 0.27250 L 12!2812005 $424.95 $f7.007 2045 T C HOSPITAL $155,945.00 0.2353Wj L 12128/2005 $367.09 $$0.00 2005 TCCOLLEGE $155 DA393K L 1212812005 $217.36 $0.00 2005 ELLER ISD $155,945.00 1.7158 L 1212812005 $2,675.70 AMOUNT TENDEREO $4.405.57 AMOUNT PAID k TOT'A1L. PAID $4,405.57 REMA NINE AMOUNT DUE: AS OF 1212812006 , V E x.017 E(; l� , Case No. Attachment F ZA09 -017 Page 38 BETSY PRICE TARRANT COUNTY TAX AssEssoR-CoLLrcrop. DATE .1212812005 ACCOUNT: 00061449206 OWNER: GOODELL, WILLIAM J PARCEL ADDRESS: 0000000JELLICOCtR EXEMPTIONS: RECEIPT #: 39970424 CHECK #. 1716 WMNMKZA PIDN: 215W 19 ACRES: 0 DEPOSIT* 200512283991-2005/tARRANTCOUNT v �w �w M 200 SOUTHLAKE CITY $45,20,00 0.4520DO L 12tZ812005 $208.82 $O.Off 2005 TARRANT' COUNTY' $46,200.00 0.272WO L l2i=005 $123,17 $0.00 2005 T C HOSPITAL $45,200-00 0,235397 L 1212812W5 $106.40 $0.00 2005 T C COLLEGE $45200.00 0.139380 L 12Q912005 $63.00 $0-00 2005 LELLEN ISD $45,200.00 , 171580q L 12128120051 $775.54, --80.001 AMOUNTTENDERED $1.276.93 AMOUNT PAID BASE TAX $1.279.93 1 TOTAL PAID $1,276.931 REMAJNINQ AMOUNT DUE AS OF 1212812005 $0.00 DEC 2 8 200� BrrS PRICE TARRANI' COUV REMAINING AMOUNT DUE AS OF 1212812005 $0.00 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-017 Page 39 V 100 L Weatherford, Fort Worth, TX 76196 (817)884-1100 7)) e-mail-.taxoffice0tarrantcounty.com web.wwwlarrantcounty.corn RECEIPT LEGAL: JELLICO ESTATES SUBDIMSION BLK LOT 19 ' '• BETSY PRICE ` ) 100 E, Weather(ord, Fort Worth, TX 76196 00 TARRANT COUNTY 4 �. mail : taxof�ice�tarra dlty.frSm offic e tax offic e@ tar r a n tcounty.com TAx ASSESsoR- CoLLF.c, mP, 45,200 web:vruvW. #arrantcounty.corn TAX STATEMENT TAXING ENTITIES 2W5 TAX STATEMENT EXEMPTION DATE: 1i!MV2005 TAX RATE TAW - Legirlativecim 5s47 ACCOUNT: MM1449222 5 Year G Son on ft track of statement. LEGAL: JELLIGO ESTATES SUBDIVISION SLK LOT 21 tlfl%IRTANTE - Camb�os LegislaCnias AfWANTE - Cambios Lgisl0ms �_. CURRENTLY Cornpammn de 5 Anus debais del Gobm. OWNER: GOOMLL. WUAMJ OWNER: GOODELL, Wq.L4AMJ 45,200 PARCEL ADDRESS: 000D000 JELLIOO OR 2 8,82 O .82 EXEMPTIONS: 45,200 0 LAND VALUE APPRAtSEUVAL ii BETSY ICE � .e � T�+ttR.� COUNTY � (817) 884.1100 r -r e mall-#axo£fice@tarrantcoun tY-com ` TAX AssFsso CoLL-EcroR web:>lrwvlL rrantcouroty,torra 45,260 45,200 TAX STATEMENT TAXING ENTITIES APPRAI$ED VALUE EXEMPTION TAXABLE VALUE TAX RATE 13ASE TAX TAXES DUE - AMOUNT tlfl%IRTANTE - Camb�os LegislaCnias PER $100 : � -, —=M CURRENTLY SOUTHLAKE CITY ,20 OWNER: GOODELL, Wq.L4AMJ 45,200 d. 2 8,82 O .82 TARRANT COUNTY 45,200 0 45,200 0.272590 123.17 123.17 T C HOSPITAL 45,200 0 45,200 0.235397 108.40 106.40. T C COLLEGE 45,200 0 45,200 0.139380 63.00 63.00 ELLER ISO 4 2AD 0 4�s 200 1:71$80 "' 775:4 775.54 Total Taxes 1,275.93 1,276.93 VISA sCh9*0vaCerd Visit our webi;ite for online credit online card or eCheck payments. PWment by phone is available at the below number. 1- 800.541) -0844 s ° r E. Weatherford, Fart Worth, TX 76196 ii BETSY ICE � .e � T�+ttR.� COUNTY � (817) 884.1100 r -r e mall-#axo£fice@tarrantcoun tY-com ` TAX AssFsso CoLL-EcroR web:>lrwvlL rrantcouroty,torra 45,200: .. 45.200 TAX STATEMENT DATE: 10101=05 APPRAISED VALUE NPORTANT - LeqkAWe Changes 56436 ACC OUM T: 0=1449214 RASE TAX 5 Year Con"wan on the back of statement. LEGAL: JEWCO ESTATES SUBDMS3C3N ELK LOT 20 AMOUNT tlfl%IRTANTE - Camb�os LegislaCnias t $100 : � -, —=M _ .CURRENTLY rmm� 5 Arms deUn s duf G td. OWNER: GOODELL, Wq.L4AMJ 0 . 62000 208.82 PARCEL ADDRESS: 0000M JELUCOCIR TARRANT COUNTY EXEMPTIONS: 0 #.AND VALUE APPRAISED VAL 93 1,2X OA 45,200: .. 45.200 TAXING ENTITIES APPRAISED VALUE EXEMPTION TAXABLE VALUE TAX RATE RASE TAX TAXES DUE AMOUNT t $100 _ .CURRENTLY SOUTHL.AKE CITY 0 . 62000 208.82 08.112 TARRANT COUNTY 45,200 0 45,200 0.272500 123.17 123.17 'r. c' HOSPITAL - - - - -- 45,200 0 0.235397 10t3.A11 108.40 T C COLLEGE 45,200 0 45,2i16 . 01 63.00 63.00 K LLER ISO 45.200 0 45,200 . 3.715800 775_ 54 7 554 Total Taxes 1,27$. � Card 1001I� 1 44 Visit our website for online credit card or eCheak paMents. Payment by phone is available at the below number: Case No. ZA09 -017 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 9,278.�i Et11C.t,flDES PAYMENTS RECEIVED Attachment F Page 40 7 - 93 1,2X OA TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 9,278.�i Et11C.t,flDES PAYMENTS RECEIVED Attachment F Page 40 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480 -588 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 2C26 AND 2C27, J.G. ALLEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 18, SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 3.40 ACRES AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "SF -1A" SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO "SP -1" SITE PLAN DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B ", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "SF -1 A" Single - Family Case No. Attachment G ZA09 -017 Page 1 Residential District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off - street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off - street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over - crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of Case No. Attachment G ZA09 -017 Page 2 those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over - crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being legally described as Tracts 2C26 and 2C27, J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas being approximately 3.40 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "SF -1A" Single - Family Residential District to "SP -1" Site Plan District as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B," and subject to the following Case No. Attachment G ZA09 -017 Page 3 conditions: 1. Reserved for final City Council motion / conditions SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over - crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Case No. Attachment G ZA09 -017 Page 4 SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed Case No. Attachment G ZA09 -017 Page 5 ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 20 day of July, 2010. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2010. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment G ZA09 -017 Page 6 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. Attachment G ZA09 -017 Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" Being legally described as Tracts 2C26 and 2C27, J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas being approximately 3.40 acres, and more fully and completely described as follows Reserved for Metes & Bounds Description Case No. Attachment G ZA09 -017 Page 8 EXHIBIT "B" Reserved for approved Site Plan Case No. Attachment G ZA09 -017 Page 9