Item 6F
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
May 26, 2010
CASE NO: ZA09-070
PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, DPS Addition
REQUEST:
On behalf of the City of Southlake, RPGA Design Group, Inc. is requesting approval of
a preliminary plat for Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, DPS Addition. The property is located at the
northeast corner of N. White Chapel Blvd. and E. Dove Rd., being described as Tracts
1F, 1F1 and 1F2, Joel W. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 350, Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas. The purpose of the preliminary plat is to create two lots on
approximately 32.921 acres, with the western lot to be the site of the proposed DPS
North Training Facility (Zoning Case ZA09-069) and the eastern lot to possibly be used
for a City of Southlake Multi-Purpose Field Complex (Zoning Case ZA10-011).
ACTION NEEDED: Consider approval of a preliminary plat
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information Link to Presentation
(D) SPIN meeting report dated November 9, 2009
(E) Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated Dec. 30, 2009
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
for Commission and Council Members Only
(G) Full Size Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT:
Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No.
ZA09-070
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER:
The City of Southlake
APPLICANT:
RPGA Design Group, Inc.
PROPERTY SITUATION:
The northeast corner of E. Dove Rd. and N. White Chapel Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Tracts 1F, 1F1 and 1F2, Joel W. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 350
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Public/Semi-Public and Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING:
“SF-1A” Single Family Residential District
REQUESTED ZONING:
“S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
HISTORY:
There isno development history on this property.
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW:
A SPIN meeting was held November 9, 2009 (see attached report).
STRATEGIC LINK:
Strategy Map Focus Area - Safety and Security
SOUTHLAKE 2025 PLAN:
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
An eight-foot (8’) multi-use trail is planned along the north side of E. Dove Rd.
and the eight-foot trail is shown on the site plan. An eight-foot (8’) multi-use
trail is programmed along the west side of N. White Chapel Blvd. The five-foot
(5’) sidewalk that is required with site plan approval is shown on the east side
of N. White Chapel Blvd. On-street bikeways are planned for N. White Chapel
Blvd. and E. Dove Rd.
Environmental Resource Protection Plan
The Environmental Resource Protection Map shows an area of trees to be
preserved where appropriate at the northwest corner of the property adjacent
to White Chapel Blvd. The Tree Mitigation Plan shows that the trees in this
area are to be preserved with the exception of some diseased and/or dying
trees that are shown as marginal and may be removed.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA09-070 Page 1
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends N. White Chapel Blvd. to have 70
feet of right-of-way and E. Dove Rd. to have 88’ of right-of-way. Adequate right-
of-way for these roads is shown on the plat.
WATER & SEWER:
A 12” diameter water line exists in theN. White Chapel Blvd. right-of-way to
serve the property. The sanitary sewer line for the project will connect to an
existing 18”/14” force main in the E. Dove Rd. right-of-way.
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS:
Drainage from this site is generally to the east to the proposed detention pond
within the development, which will outfall to the existing creek east of
Ridgecrest Drive.
TREE PRESERVATION:
Existing trees that are shown to be preserved must be preserved or mitigated if
altered. Please see the additional comments in the Tree Conservation Review
section of the attached Plat Review Summary.
PLANNING &
ZONING COMMISSION:
January 7, 2010; Approved (5-1), subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated
December 30, 2009.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Plat Review SummaryNo.2, dated December 30, 2009, is attached.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA09-070 Page 2
Case No. Attachment B
ZA09-070 Page 1
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
TIA Executive Summary Dated November 30, 2009
Case No. Attachment C
ZA09-070 Page 1
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO.
Formal Application Pending
PROJECT NAME:
North DPS Training Facility & North Park Multi-Purpose Field Complex
SPIN DISTRICT:
SPIN # 2
MEETING DATE:
November 9, 2009
MEETING LOCATION:
1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MEETING ROOMS 3A & 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE:
Forty (40)
City Staff: Jim Blagg, Asst. City Manager-Operations; Robert Finn,
APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING:
Chief of Police; Chris Tribble, Director of Community Services; and Project Architect, Robert Garza;
Park Design Consultant, Spencer Freeman
OTHER STAFF PRESENT:
Peter Kao, Construction Manager; Gordon Mayer, Deputy Director of
Public Works; Ken Baker, Director of Planning & Development Services; Bob Price, Director of
Public Works; Cheryl Taylor, Civil Engineer; Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT:
Lorrie Fletcher, (817)748-8069; lfletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation
The property is located at the northeast corner of Dove and White Chapel.
Development Details
The City of Southlake is proposing to construct a police and fire training facility as well as a multi-
purpose field complex on approximately 32 acres. The proposed North Park will include four (4) multi-
purpose fields intended for Southlake Touch Football and Carroll La Crosse.
DISCUSSION
Explain the firing range; will there be a privacy fence? What are the expected noise levels?
We are proposing an eight (8) foot privacy fence around the property. The firing range is
o
mostly underground and completely enclosed; there is little noise from the firing range
anticipated.
Will there be controlled fires for training?
Yes, however, no real burn - propane.
o
Where do you train today and how do you justify the cost of this facility?
Our police and fire fighters currently train at DFW. The scheduling is challenging and costly
o
in overtime pay. Our response time will significantly improve with a local facility. Also, other
agencies will use this facility which will cover operating cost.
Will the firing range have a filtration system?
Yes, an action target system is planned.
o
Traffic is already heavy. What are you going to do about increased traffic?
We anticipate the facility will be used during off-peak hours. We will be conducting a traffic
o
impact analysis before this goes to P&Z. By the time the new facility is constructed, the
roundabout will be completed, which should help.
When do you anticipate completion of construction and is the cost already budgeted?
Case No. Attachment D
ZA09-070 Page 1
Construction is anticipated to begin late 2010/early 2011 and completed by 2012. The
o
funds have been budgeted… City Council has approved the Crimes Control Plan. Also, this
proposal will have to go through the process of Planning and Zoning as well as City
Council, for approval. A full cost analysis has not been done yet.
Comments/Concerns
Noisy sport’s fields not appropriate for this area
CISD doesn’t have lights but this will…
Our homes were here first
Sufficient parking
Access from north side off cul-de-sac
Functional fence vs. decorative
Weapon’s specifications for shooting range
Ground animal displacement
Park connectivity
Drainage
Lights
Power lines
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather
it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as
summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and
Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA09-070 Page 2
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA09-070Two12/30/09
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Preliminary Plat – Lots 1&2, Block 1, DPS Addition
Project Name:
APPLICANT: RPGA Design Group, Inc. OWNER: City of Southlake
Robert Garza Jim C. Blagg
101 S. Jennings Ave. #100 1400 Main St. Ste 460
Fort Worth, TX 76104 Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 332-9477 ext. 208 Phone: (817) 748-8601
Fax: (817) 332-9487 Fax: (817) 481-5826
E-mail: robgarza@rpgaarchitects.com E-mail: jblagg@ci.southlake.tx.us
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
12/21/09 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF
YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS
KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072.
1. Please remove the existing and proposed zoning from the title block. The proposed zoning is “S-P-1”
and not “CS”.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
(817) 748-8229
kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
TREE CONSERVATION:
1. Please remove all utility easements and utility lines from the open space area located between the
proposed main building and the driving course area. These easements and utilities conflict the
preservation of the existing trees within the open space area.
2. Please ensure that all proposed utilities do not conflict with the proposed preservation of any existing
trees. Existing trees that are shown to be preserved must be preserved or mitigated if altered. Please
make the project Engineer aware of this and both him and the Landscape Architect work together to
preserve the existing trees as shown on the plan.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved
Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved
by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities,
structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing
trees intended to be preserved.
The following should be informational comments only
============= ====================
Case No. Attachment E
ZA09-070 Page 1
* It appears this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone, requiring
construction standards in compliance with the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No.
479. Additionally, the “Avigation Easement and Release” shown in Appendix 3 of the Subdivision
Ordinance No. 483 should be executed on subsequent Plats to be filed in the County Plat Records.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment E
ZA09-070 Page 2
Surrounding Property Owners
SPO # Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Response
1. Southlake, City Of CS Public Park/Open Space 17.44 NR
2. Gonser, Lois I SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.30 NR
3. Campbell, Bradley W Etux Cindy SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.26 O
4. Southlake, City Of SF1-A Low Density Residential 0.65 NR
5. Rawls, Bobby Etux Lisa SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.24 U
6. Rodgers, Stacy Etvir Gregory SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.23 O
7. Porter, James Etux Krystal SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.02 O
8. Myles, Robert Etux Karamella SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.08 NR
9. Williams, Brian D Etux Darla R SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.91 NR
10. 4F Development / Ep 4 Lp RPUD Low Density Residential 0.68 NR
11. 4F Development / Ep 4 Lp RPUD Low Density Residential 0.45 NR
12. Estes Park Hoa Inc RPUD Low Density Residential 0.18 NR
13. Estes Park Hoa Inc RPUD Low Density Residential 0.61 NR
14. Toll Dallas Tx Llc RPUD Low Density Residential 0.68 NR
15. Casazza, Eric J Etux Jennie L RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.39 O
16. Gomez, Raymond Jr Etux Sharon RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.39 NR
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 1
17. Friedman, Benjamin Etux Gina RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.39 NR
18. Holden, Scott C Etux Paula C RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.39 NR
19. Darnule, Amit T Etux Neeta RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.40 Concern
20. Bay, Theresa A RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.45 NR
21. Southlake, City Of RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.67 NR
22. Perrone, Gregory Etux Tammy L RPUD Low Density Residential 0.60 O
23. Afolabi, Oladapo Etux Elizabet RPUD Low Density Residential 0.81 NR
24. Claffey, Charlie Etux Maria RPUD Low Density Residential 0.52 NR
25. Hamel, James W Etux Susan I RPUD Low Density Residential 0.58 NR
26. Smith, Jeffrey Etux Susann RPUD Low Density Residential 0.52 O
27. Derby, George Etux Barbara Der RPUD Low Density Residential 0.67 NR
28. Tidwell, Anthony J RPUD Low Density Residential 0.65 O
29. Dufour, Blair F Etux Cathy J SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.55 NR
30. Rue, Peter Leroy SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.13 NR
31. Santiago, Nelson Etux Carmen SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.19 NR
32. Holliday, Richard M Etux Mary SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.60 U
33. Tate, J R Etux Kathryn AG Low Density Residential 4.50 NR
34. Simpson, Michael AG Low Density Residential 1.92 NR
35. Strait, Jessica Colleen SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.17 NR
36. Jmsat Real Estate Ltd AG Low Density Residential 4.30 F/O
37. Keen, Thomas A AG Low Density Residential 6.60 NR
38. Fertitta, Steven Michael AG Low Density Residential 1.20 NR
Low Density Residential, Public/Semi-
39. NR
Southlake, City Of SF1-A Public 28.91
40. Southlake, City Of SF1-A Low Density Residential 0.60 NR
41. Southlake, City Of SF1-A Public/Semi-Public 2.10 NR
42. Awtry, Karen Markum AG Low Density Residential 1.44 NR
43. Nair, Kesavan Etux Saji Pilla SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.23 NR
44. Southlake, City Of RPUD Mixed Use 0.54 NR
45. Southlake, City Of CS Public/Semi-Public 0.88 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent:
Forty-five (45)
Responses Received:
Eleven (11) – Attached
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 2
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 3
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 4
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 5
Page 1 of 3
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 6
Page 2 of 3
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 7
g
Page 3 of 3
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 8
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 9
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 10
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 11
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 12
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 13
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 14
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-070 Page 15