Loading...
Item 6F Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T May 26, 2010 CASE NO: ZA09-070 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, DPS Addition REQUEST: On behalf of the City of Southlake, RPGA Design Group, Inc. is requesting approval of a preliminary plat for Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, DPS Addition. The property is located at the northeast corner of N. White Chapel Blvd. and E. Dove Rd., being described as Tracts 1F, 1F1 and 1F2, Joel W. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 350, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. The purpose of the preliminary plat is to create two lots on approximately 32.921 acres, with the western lot to be the site of the proposed DPS North Training Facility (Zoning Case ZA09-069) and the eastern lot to possibly be used for a City of Southlake Multi-Purpose Field Complex (Zoning Case ZA10-011). ACTION NEEDED: Consider approval of a preliminary plat ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information Link to Presentation (D) SPIN meeting report dated November 9, 2009 (E) Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated Dec. 30, 2009 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses for Commission and Council Members Only (G) Full Size Plans () STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Richard Schell (817) 748-8602 Case No. ZA09-070 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: The City of Southlake APPLICANT: RPGA Design Group, Inc. PROPERTY SITUATION: The northeast corner of E. Dove Rd. and N. White Chapel Blvd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 1F, 1F1 and 1F2, Joel W. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 350 LAND USE CATEGORY: Public/Semi-Public and Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District REQUESTED ZONING: “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District HISTORY: There isno development history on this property. CITIZEN INPUT/ BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN meeting was held November 9, 2009 (see attached report). STRATEGIC LINK: Strategy Map Focus Area - Safety and Security SOUTHLAKE 2025 PLAN: Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan An eight-foot (8’) multi-use trail is planned along the north side of E. Dove Rd. and the eight-foot trail is shown on the site plan. An eight-foot (8’) multi-use trail is programmed along the west side of N. White Chapel Blvd. The five-foot (5’) sidewalk that is required with site plan approval is shown on the east side of N. White Chapel Blvd. On-street bikeways are planned for N. White Chapel Blvd. and E. Dove Rd. Environmental Resource Protection Plan The Environmental Resource Protection Map shows an area of trees to be preserved where appropriate at the northwest corner of the property adjacent to White Chapel Blvd. The Tree Mitigation Plan shows that the trees in this area are to be preserved with the exception of some diseased and/or dying trees that are shown as marginal and may be removed. Case No. Attachment A ZA09-070 Page 1 TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends N. White Chapel Blvd. to have 70 feet of right-of-way and E. Dove Rd. to have 88’ of right-of-way. Adequate right- of-way for these roads is shown on the plat. WATER & SEWER: A 12” diameter water line exists in theN. White Chapel Blvd. right-of-way to serve the property. The sanitary sewer line for the project will connect to an existing 18”/14” force main in the E. Dove Rd. right-of-way. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: Drainage from this site is generally to the east to the proposed detention pond within the development, which will outfall to the existing creek east of Ridgecrest Drive. TREE PRESERVATION: Existing trees that are shown to be preserved must be preserved or mitigated if altered. Please see the additional comments in the Tree Conservation Review section of the attached Plat Review Summary. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION: January 7, 2010; Approved (5-1), subject to Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated December 30, 2009. STAFF COMMENTS: Plat Review SummaryNo.2, dated December 30, 2009, is attached. Case No. Attachment A ZA09-070 Page 2 Case No. Attachment B ZA09-070 Page 1 Link to PowerPoint Presentation TIA Executive Summary Dated November 30, 2009 Case No. Attachment C ZA09-070 Page 1 SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. Formal Application Pending PROJECT NAME: North DPS Training Facility & North Park Multi-Purpose Field Complex SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN # 2 MEETING DATE: November 9, 2009 MEETING LOCATION: 1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS MEETING ROOMS 3A & 3B TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Forty (40)  City Staff: Jim Blagg, Asst. City Manager-Operations; Robert Finn, APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Chief of Police; Chris Tribble, Director of Community Services; and Project Architect, Robert Garza; Park Design Consultant, Spencer Freeman  OTHER STAFF PRESENT: Peter Kao, Construction Manager; Gordon Mayer, Deputy Director of Public Works; Ken Baker, Director of Planning & Development Services; Bob Price, Director of Public Works; Cheryl Taylor, Civil Engineer; Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Lorrie Fletcher, (817)748-8069; lfletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation The property is located at the northeast corner of Dove and White Chapel. Development Details  The City of Southlake is proposing to construct a police and fire training facility as well as a multi- purpose field complex on approximately 32 acres. The proposed North Park will include four (4) multi- purpose fields intended for Southlake Touch Football and Carroll La Crosse. DISCUSSION  Explain the firing range; will there be a privacy fence? What are the expected noise levels? We are proposing an eight (8) foot privacy fence around the property. The firing range is o mostly underground and completely enclosed; there is little noise from the firing range anticipated.  Will there be controlled fires for training? Yes, however, no real burn - propane. o  Where do you train today and how do you justify the cost of this facility? Our police and fire fighters currently train at DFW. The scheduling is challenging and costly o in overtime pay. Our response time will significantly improve with a local facility. Also, other agencies will use this facility which will cover operating cost.  Will the firing range have a filtration system? Yes, an action target system is planned. o  Traffic is already heavy. What are you going to do about increased traffic? We anticipate the facility will be used during off-peak hours. We will be conducting a traffic o impact analysis before this goes to P&Z. By the time the new facility is constructed, the roundabout will be completed, which should help.  When do you anticipate completion of construction and is the cost already budgeted? Case No. Attachment D ZA09-070 Page 1 Construction is anticipated to begin late 2010/early 2011 and completed by 2012. The o funds have been budgeted… City Council has approved the Crimes Control Plan. Also, this proposal will have to go through the process of Planning and Zoning as well as City Council, for approval. A full cost analysis has not been done yet. Comments/Concerns  Noisy sport’s fields not appropriate for this area  CISD doesn’t have lights but this will…  Our homes were here first  Sufficient parking  Access from north side off cul-de-sac  Functional fence vs. decorative  Weapon’s specifications for shooting range  Ground animal displacement  Park connectivity  Drainage  Lights  Power lines SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment D ZA09-070 Page 2 PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY ZA09-070Two12/30/09 Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review: Preliminary Plat – Lots 1&2, Block 1, DPS Addition Project Name: APPLICANT: RPGA Design Group, Inc. OWNER: City of Southlake Robert Garza Jim C. Blagg 101 S. Jennings Ave. #100 1400 Main St. Ste 460 Fort Worth, TX 76104 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 332-9477 ext. 208 Phone: (817) 748-8601 Fax: (817) 332-9487 Fax: (817) 481-5826 E-mail: robgarza@rpgaarchitects.com E-mail: jblagg@ci.southlake.tx.us CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/21/09 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072. 1. Please remove the existing and proposed zoning from the title block. The proposed zoning is “S-P-1” and not “CS”. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator (817) 748-8229 kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us TREE CONSERVATION: 1. Please remove all utility easements and utility lines from the open space area located between the proposed main building and the driving course area. These easements and utilities conflict the preservation of the existing trees within the open space area. 2. Please ensure that all proposed utilities do not conflict with the proposed preservation of any existing trees. Existing trees that are shown to be preserved must be preserved or mitigated if altered. Please make the project Engineer aware of this and both him and the Landscape Architect work together to preserve the existing trees as shown on the plan. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. The following should be informational comments only ============= ==================== Case No. Attachment E ZA09-070 Page 1 * It appears this property lies within the 65 'LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone, requiring construction standards in compliance with the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. Additionally, the “Avigation Easement and Release” shown in Appendix 3 of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 should be executed on subsequent Plats to be filed in the County Plat Records. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment E ZA09-070 Page 2 Surrounding Property Owners SPO # Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Response 1. Southlake, City Of CS Public Park/Open Space 17.44 NR 2. Gonser, Lois I SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.30 NR 3. Campbell, Bradley W Etux Cindy SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.26 O 4. Southlake, City Of SF1-A Low Density Residential 0.65 NR 5. Rawls, Bobby Etux Lisa SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.24 U 6. Rodgers, Stacy Etvir Gregory SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.23 O 7. Porter, James Etux Krystal SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.02 O 8. Myles, Robert Etux Karamella SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.08 NR 9. Williams, Brian D Etux Darla R SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.91 NR 10. 4F Development / Ep 4 Lp RPUD Low Density Residential 0.68 NR 11. 4F Development / Ep 4 Lp RPUD Low Density Residential 0.45 NR 12. Estes Park Hoa Inc RPUD Low Density Residential 0.18 NR 13. Estes Park Hoa Inc RPUD Low Density Residential 0.61 NR 14. Toll Dallas Tx Llc RPUD Low Density Residential 0.68 NR 15. Casazza, Eric J Etux Jennie L RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.39 O 16. Gomez, Raymond Jr Etux Sharon RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.39 NR Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 1 17. Friedman, Benjamin Etux Gina RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.39 NR 18. Holden, Scott C Etux Paula C RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.39 NR 19. Darnule, Amit T Etux Neeta RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.40 Concern 20. Bay, Theresa A RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.45 NR 21. Southlake, City Of RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.67 NR 22. Perrone, Gregory Etux Tammy L RPUD Low Density Residential 0.60 O 23. Afolabi, Oladapo Etux Elizabet RPUD Low Density Residential 0.81 NR 24. Claffey, Charlie Etux Maria RPUD Low Density Residential 0.52 NR 25. Hamel, James W Etux Susan I RPUD Low Density Residential 0.58 NR 26. Smith, Jeffrey Etux Susann RPUD Low Density Residential 0.52 O 27. Derby, George Etux Barbara Der RPUD Low Density Residential 0.67 NR 28. Tidwell, Anthony J RPUD Low Density Residential 0.65 O 29. Dufour, Blair F Etux Cathy J SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.55 NR 30. Rue, Peter Leroy SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.13 NR 31. Santiago, Nelson Etux Carmen SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.19 NR 32. Holliday, Richard M Etux Mary SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.60 U 33. Tate, J R Etux Kathryn AG Low Density Residential 4.50 NR 34. Simpson, Michael AG Low Density Residential 1.92 NR 35. Strait, Jessica Colleen SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.17 NR 36. Jmsat Real Estate Ltd AG Low Density Residential 4.30 F/O 37. Keen, Thomas A AG Low Density Residential 6.60 NR 38. Fertitta, Steven Michael AG Low Density Residential 1.20 NR Low Density Residential, Public/Semi- 39. NR Southlake, City Of SF1-A Public 28.91 40. Southlake, City Of SF1-A Low Density Residential 0.60 NR 41. Southlake, City Of SF1-A Public/Semi-Public 2.10 NR 42. Awtry, Karen Markum AG Low Density Residential 1.44 NR 43. Nair, Kesavan Etux Saji Pilla SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.23 NR 44. Southlake, City Of RPUD Mixed Use 0.54 NR 45. Southlake, City Of CS Public/Semi-Public 0.88 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Forty-five (45) Responses Received: Eleven (11) – Attached Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 2 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 3 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 4 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 5 Page 1 of 3 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 6 Page 2 of 3 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 7 g Page 3 of 3 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 8 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 9 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 10 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 11 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 12 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 13 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 14 Case No. Attachment F ZA09-070 Page 15