Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Item 6C
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE MEMORANDUM May 26, 2010 To: From: Subject: Action Requested: Background Information: City Council Ken Baker, AICP — Director of Planning & Development Services Ordinance No. 971: Southlake 2030 North Sector Land Use Plan Conduct public hearing and consider the 2nd reading for Ordinance No. 971: Southlake 2030 North Sector Land Use Plan. The City of Southlake approaches land use planning through sector planning, a method which divides the City into sectors to identify development issues and to develop recommendations for each individual area. This approach recognizes that planning issues are numerous and complex, and may vary from area to area or even site to site. In short, the purpose of a sector plan is to: • Establish a detailed background for the planning area, • Identify current development constraints and issues, • Identify features, resources and areas to be protected or improved, • Explore development opportunities and • List recommendations for the future development and conservation of the area. The first sector plan to be developed during the Southlake 2030 Plan is the North Sector Plan. Following the May 4 City Council meeting, staff has incorporated the following changes into Table 5 (North Sector Environmental Resource Recommendations): Reference Number Revision E6 In the recommendations column, changed wording from Page 27 "discussion of local ecology and wildlife corridors" to "identify ". and include local ecology and wildlife corridors E10 In the recommendations column: Page 29 • Added a note: "Any demonstration landscaping in City ROW must first be approved by City Council." • Added: "Encourage the use of "smart" sprinkler controllers that automatically adjust the watering schedule in response to environmental conditions, such as evapotranspiration controllers and soil moisture sensor systems." • Added: "Evaluate possible implementation of water conservation methods and techniques during gas drilling." Financial Considerations: None. Strategic Link: The North Sector Land Use Plan relates to all focus areas of the strategy map. Citizen Input/ Board Review: All meetings of the Southlake 2030 Land Use Plan Committee were open to the public. The following committee meetings were held to discuss the North Sector: • November 12, 2009 • January 27, 2010 • March 3, 2010 In addition, a SPIN citywide meeting was held on February 25, 2010 (see the SPIN report in Attachment A). A public hearing was held for this item at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on April 8, 2010. A public hearing is also scheduled for City Council on May 18. Planning & Zoning Commission: April 8, 2010; Approved (5 -0) as presented. City Council: May 4, 2010; Approved 1s' reading (7 -0) with the notations as discussed. May 18, 2010; 2nd reading tabled (7 -0) to June 1, 2010. Legal Review: None. Alternatives: Recommend modifications to the proposed North Sector Plan or move forward with the North Sector Plan as presented. Attachments: (A) SPIN Meeting Report (B) Ordinance No. 971 (C) Southlake 2030 North Sector Plan (D) Comments Received CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Attachment A SPIN MEETING REPORT PROJECT NAME: Southlake 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan — North Sector Plan SPIN DISTRICTS: SPIN # 1, 2,3 & 4 MEETING DATE: February 25, 2010 MEETING LOCATION: 1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS MEETING ROOMS 3C & 3D TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Forty -One (41) • SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: • STAFF PRESENTING & PRESENT: Ken Baker, Director of Planning & Development Services, Clayton Comstock, Planner II, Jenny Crosby, Planner II, Daniel Cortez, Planner I, Gordon Mayer, City Engineer and Mike Starr, Fire Chief STAFF CONTACT: Clayton Comstock, (817)748 -8269; ccomstock(aDci. south lake. tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Situation The North Sector is bordered by Lake Grapevine to the north, T. W. King Rd. and Kirkwood Blvd. to the west and the City limits to the east. The southern boundary is defined by Highland Rd., SH 114 and the southern boundary of existing subdivisions between White Chapel Blvd. and N. Carroll Ave. Plan Details The North Sector Plan is the first of eight sector plans developed during the Southlake 2030 process. The sector has a distinctive rural character due to the large lot residential development pattern and the heavy concentration of natural landscape. As such, the primary objectives for planning in the north sector are the preservation and enhancement of the existing rural character and the preservation of natural areas. The North Sector Plan further addresses the unique characteristics and challenges of the north side and provides specific planning recommendations in regard to land use, mobility, environmental resources, as well as parks, recreation and open space. QUESTIONS / CONCERNS • Where was the Land Use Plan when Winfield Estates was approved? It doesn't match the current Land Use. o The Land Use Plan is used only as a tool to attempt to guide future development; when staff presents projects to boards and committees the land use designation is presented to them. • So the areas indicated on the map are what's changing in Land Use? CITY OF SOUTHLA KE o Staff has attempted to identify the areas that have been developed already and adjust the land use accordingly to be reflective of the development that exists there. • You're using a broad change to identify what's there, it's only a technicality to go denser, we should just keep it to Low Density Residential. • What is the threshold for Medium Density Residential, how dense is that? o Anything more than 1 dwelling unit (d /u) per acre. • That concerns me because wouldn't that allow a developer to go as dense as they would like? o Southlake does not have any high density land use designation, the most dense this land use would permit is lot sizes that average 20,000 square feet [Referring to Medium Density Residential]. The most dense area in the city would be the brownstones in Town Square. • What's the point of having a plan if it doesn't preclude what ends up getting built there, the plan keeps getting ignored? • Why do you want to remove the Rural Conservation from the Cliffs of Clariden Ranch? o Since the tract has already been developed with many homes on it the optional land use category wouldn't be necessary on the area as it is a tool for developers to develop land in a less environmentally disturbing way. • Where was the threshold for 20 acres for the Rural Conservation designation obtained from? o Staff did research during the 2025 process that indicated that a minimum of 20 acres is necessary for this type of development to be successful. • Who are you looking out for the developers or the citizens? • When Kimball Avenue gets widened are you ruling out any businesses going on Kimball? o The Rural Conservation is an option for whoever decides they want to develop, currently the land use is Low Density Residential and wouldn't permit for office zoning. • So you're saying this is allowing a developer to come in on a smaller tract and develop under the Rural Conservation? o The amount of land area is still required if someone decides to develop under the Rural Conservation optional land use but does act as an enabling tool to develop denser lots with more preserved open space that couldn't be developed. • There's a lot of cyclists going through White Chapel and Dove Road, shouldn't it be considered to add a bike lane or trail for the cyclists, it's a cyclists mecca out there? o A couple of options will be considered during the process of our Mobility Element of the Comprehensive Plan which could include much wider lanes for cyclists. Cyclists traditionally prefer the roads over any sidewalks particularly when they ride in groups. • The Walnut Grove Recreational Trail is something that is not in any of the city's literature or in any plan. CITY OF SOUTHLRKE o That could potentially be added as a recommendation to the plan. • The water is running at Bob Jones Park in the ponds and for their grass when we're being restricted heavily on water use, then they have a sign saying its well water, I'm sure it comes from the same aquifer, they should be restricted as well. • We need to be careful during development of the properties that are adjacent to the Corp of Engineers property because they could potentially block off access to the lake and trails. • 1 don't see ecological protection addressed in this plan and it wasn't in the previous plan, it is important to distinguish between environmental and ecological. o The 2025 plan was our first attempt at any kind of environmental resource protection identification, we're going to attempt to further elaborate and identify more issues and areas in the new one. • How can we get property designated by land use to ensure that it is maintained by the city and regularly done so; the open space by Oak Pointe is poorly maintained and we have not seen anyone come by for upkeep? o It is possible to require a maintenance plan by the developer when they have some open space within the development. If it is City parkland however, the Community Services Department should be maintaining that area. • Do you know if they would return that parkland at Oak Pointe to the HOA? o It may be possible but I couldn't say for certain right now. • 1 would simply like to comment that I am strongly opposed to any changes from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential or the removal of the Rural Conservation from any property. GENERAL CONCERNS • Density • Conservation • Tree Protection • Traffic • Implementation of the Plan SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. ORDINANCE NO. 971 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE NORTH SECTOR PLAN AS AN ELEMENT OF THE SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN, THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. WHEREAS, a Home Rule Charter of the City of Southlake, Texas, was approved by the voters in a duly called Charter election on April 4, 1987; and, WHEREAS, the Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI requires an update to the City's comprehensive plan elements every four years, WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that the North Sector Plan is an element of the Southlake 2030 Plan, the City's Comprehensive Master Plan, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the North Sector Plan complies with the Southlake 2030 Vision, Goals, & Objectives, WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that the North Sector Plan provides the guiding principles for all the elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including the Land Use and Master Thoroughfare Plans, for the North Sector, WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed that the North Sector Plan has been formulated with adequate public input, WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed that the recommendations in the North Sector Plan herein reflect the community's desires for the future development of the North Sector, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this ordinance as if copied in its entirety. Section 2. The statements in `Exhibit 1' are hereby adopted as the North Sector Plan of the Southlake 2030 Plan. Section 3. The different elements of the Comprehensive Master Plan, as adopted and amended by the City Council from time to time, shall be kept on file in the office of the City Secretary of the City of Southlake, along with a copy of the ordinance and minute order of the Council so adopting or approving the same. Any existing element of the Comprehensive Master Plan which has been heretofore adopted by the City Council shall remain in full force until amended by the City Council as provided herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. Section 5. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. Section 6. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. Section 7. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after final passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 8. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 4 day of May, 2010. John Terrell, MAYOR ATTEST: Lori Payne, CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 1 St day of June, 2010. John Terrell, MAYOR ATTEST: Lori Payne, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: LU N *** , 0 Q J F- N • 2030 DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2 010 CITY OF S UTHLAKE 13 Abstract The North Sector Plan is the first of eight sector plans developed during the Southlake 2030 process. The sector has a distinctive rural character due to the large lot residential development pattern and the heavy concentration of natural landscape. As such, the primary objectives for planning in the north sector are the preservation and enhancement of the existing rural character and the preservation of natural areas. The North Sector Plan further addresses the unique characteristics and challenges of the north side and provides specific planning recommendations in regard to land use, mobility, environmental resources, as well as parks, recreation and open space. Sector Planning and Land Use Planning Introduction The City of Southlake's Land Use Plan serves as the community's vision for future development by allocating the appropriate location, concentration and intensity of future development by land use categories. The plan serves as a guide to all decision making as it pertains to the City's future development. The City of Southlake approaches land use planning through sector planning, a method which divides the City into sectors to identify development issues and to develop recommendations for each individual area. This approach recognizes that planning issues are numerous and complex, and may vary from area to area or even site to site. In short, the purpose of a sector plan is to: • Establish a detailed background for the planning area, • Identify current development constraints and issues, • Identify features, resources and areas to be protected or improved, • Explore development opportunities and • List recommendations for the future development and conservation of the area. Sector planning was first implemented in Southlake during the development of the Southlake 2025 Plan in 2004. The City was originally divided into nine planning areas, although some areas were combined during the actual planning process. For the purposes of the 2030 Plan, the City has been divided into eight sectors: North Sector Plan DRAFT May 12, 2010 Page i MAP 1: SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLANNING SECTORS W BOB JONES RD SOUTHLAKE 1 3 Sector Plan Areas 11 CORRIDOR j 1705 CORRIDOR 153a CORRIDOR CENTRAL EAST NORTH SOUTH WEST LU Y Q 2 Although recommendations may vary from area to area, all sector plans are intended to work together to support a desired direction for growth as outlined in the adopted Vision, Goals and Objectives of the Southlake 2030 Plan (Ordinance No. 960). As such, the land use recommendations from the sector plans are consolidated to create one cohesive document for the City as a whole and the result is the City's Land Use Plan. Recommendations developed in the sector plans will also be incorporated into other plan elements, such as the Master Thoroughfare Plan and Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, as appropriate. In addition, the sector plans will be utilized in setting priorities in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) planning process, updating current development ordinances and creating new planning related ordinances or programs as needed. Relationship to Southlake's Strategic Management System Strategic planning is an ongoing process where resources, critical concerns, community priorities and citizen needs are combined to produce both a plan for the future and a measure for results. More specifically, Southlake's Strategic Management System links the city's day -to -day activities to a North Sector Plan DRAFT May 12, 2010 Page ii 17 W OOVE RD E DOVER® O u o � Q m E NfGi1LkN'b,ST m a fLORER�E RD 5 W s R �W � .JOHNSON RD SOUTNLANE BLVD €.$ ©UTHLAN {}3LYD. Q x 6 K D Y N m y UNION CHURCH RD . _ W CONUNENTAL HCVD E CONTINENTAL. BLVD. m A 0 2.500 5.000 10,000 1. Feet N SOUTHLAKE 1 3 Sector Plan Areas 11 CORRIDOR j 1705 CORRIDOR 153a CORRIDOR CENTRAL EAST NORTH SOUTH WEST LU Y Q 2 Although recommendations may vary from area to area, all sector plans are intended to work together to support a desired direction for growth as outlined in the adopted Vision, Goals and Objectives of the Southlake 2030 Plan (Ordinance No. 960). As such, the land use recommendations from the sector plans are consolidated to create one cohesive document for the City as a whole and the result is the City's Land Use Plan. Recommendations developed in the sector plans will also be incorporated into other plan elements, such as the Master Thoroughfare Plan and Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, as appropriate. In addition, the sector plans will be utilized in setting priorities in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) planning process, updating current development ordinances and creating new planning related ordinances or programs as needed. Relationship to Southlake's Strategic Management System Strategic planning is an ongoing process where resources, critical concerns, community priorities and citizen needs are combined to produce both a plan for the future and a measure for results. More specifically, Southlake's Strategic Management System links the city's day -to -day activities to a North Sector Plan DRAFT May 12, 2010 Page ii comprehensive long term strategy for public policy and management decisions. The Strategic Management System identifies Strategic Focus Areas and Objectives to guide effective and efficient resource allocation and provides benchmarks to assess performance. The Strategic Focus Areas and Objectives are driven by the City's Citizen Survey and are outlined in the City's Strategy Map (please see Appendix B). The Strategic Management System guided the development of the Southlake 2030 Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives (VGO), which define a desired direction for growth for the City. As such, all recommendations in the Southlake 2030 Plan are tied to at least one Strategic Focus Area from the Strategic Management System and at least one Objective from the Adopted Vision, Goals and Objectives. Relationship to Vision North Texas Vision North Texas is a public, private, non - profit and academic partnership headed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments, the Urban Land Institute, and the University of Texas at Arlington. The partnership was created to serve as a forum for discussion, research, and action on issues related to the growth and development of North Central Texas. In addition, the partnership strives to increase public awareness about important regional land use issues and to build support for initiatives that create a successful and sustainable future for North Texas. Over the last few years, Vision North Texas has invited stakeholders from across the region to participate in a series of workshops to develop a vision for the region's future as well as an action plan to achieve that vision. The result of these workshops is North Texas 2050, which describes the preferred future envisioned by Vision North Texas participants. The document also provides guiding principles to help decision - makers achieve the regional vision. The City of Southlake recognizes the importance of the regional vision and has worked to align the Southlake 2030 Plan with North Texas 2050. All North Sector Plan DRAFT May 12, 2010 Page iii Southlake 2030 recommendations are linked to at least one of the guiding principles (please see Appendix C). Additional information on North Texas 2050 and Vision North Texas is available at www.visionnorthtexas.org. North Sector Plan DRAFT May 12, 2010 Page iv Table of Contents Abstract Land Use Planning and Sector Planning Introduction 1.0 Introduction to the North Sector 1.1 Character of the Sector 1.2 Preliminary Analysis 1.2.1 Existing Land Use Distribution 1.2.2 Existing Zoning 1.2.3 Demographic Summary 1.2.4 Recent Development Changes 2.0 Planning Challenges and Issues 3.0 Land Use Recommendations 4.0 Mobility Recommendations 4.1 North Sector Transportation Network 4.2 Recommendations 5.0 Environmental Resource Recommendations 5.1 Cross Timbers Ecosystem 5.2 Tree Protection 5.3 Wildlife Management 5.4 Recommendations 6.0 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Recommendations Appendix A: Adopted Southlake 2030 Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives Appendix B: City of Southlake Strategy Map Appendix C: Vision North Texas Guiding Principles North Sector Plan DRAFT May 12, 2010 Page v 1.0 Introduction to the North Sector The North Sector is bordered by Lake Grapevine to the north, T. W. King Rd. and Kirkwood Blvd. to the west and the City limits to the east. The southern boundary is defined by Highland Rd., SH 114 and the southern boundary of existing subdivisions between White Chapel Blvd. and N. Carroll Ave. MAP 2: SOUTHLAKE 2030 NORTH SECTOR BOUNDARIES 0 x � W BOB JONES. RD. v z 3 i s � �l O O D O 9C v 11 E DOVE RD— �a � W DOVE RO_ - �o W a - -- – E- NIGNLANOST -m Y m �— M \ F i 0 2,500 5,0O0 �. 10,090 N Feet -- -114 1.1 Character of the Sector CITY OF SQUTHLAKE 1 9 _ NORTH SECTOR Southlake City Limit IU Q 0 ®® LA203© The north side of Southlake is characterized by large residential lots, large lot neighborhoods, equestrian uses, significant natural features such as tree cover and flora, lakes, streams and ponds, rural road sections, parks, schools and the Corps of Engineers property. It is not uncommon to see deer, turkey, coyotes, roadrunner, native birds or other species more commonly found in less developed areas outside the Metroplex. It is also part of the Cross Timbers ecosystem and sufficient non - fragmented areas have been retained to date to allow this system to exist in the City. DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 1 _ I Equestrian trailhead Most of the land in the north sector is either developed (with single family residential uses) or protected (as Corps property or parkland). There is very little commercial development in the sector. Although equestrian estates are found throughout Southlake, the majority are located in the north side. In addition, several properties in the area are devoted primarily to livestock uses. These features and the development pattern in the north area provide Southlake with a distinctive rural character which differentiates it from other cities in the region. As the Metroplex's population continues to grow rapidly and surrounding communities face build -out, this type of development pattern will become less probable. Accordingly, the preservation of the rural character in the north side of Southlake is of the utmost importance to the citizens. Preservation of the north side's development pattern will provide an exceptional environment in the middle of one of the most rapidly developing areas of the country. Also, as available developable land becomes scarce in Tarrant County, this unique type of development pattern will help maintain and even increase property values over other more typical or standard types of development. 1.2 Preliminary Analysis To fully understand the development issues facing the north side, an analysis of existing conditions is critical. The following section offers an assessment of the existing land uses, zoning and demographics as well as a description of recent development changes in the north sector. 1.2.1 Existing Land Use Distribution The distribution of existing land uses indicates that over half of the 3,999 acres in the north sector is comprised of residential uses (2,159 acres). Almost 30% of the total area is Corps Property and Parks and Open Space (1,137 acres). Commercial property comprises less than one percent of the sector, consisting of approximately six acres of retail land at the intersection of Kimball Ave. and Dove Rd. and eleven acres of industrial land. Only about 267 acres (6 %) is vacant or underdeveloped land that is DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 2 Typical house in the North Sector Plan Area suitable for further development. Recent developments have been residential in nature and include the Estes Park subdivision. TABLE 1: NORTH SECTOR EXISTING LAND USES Existing Land Use Residential Acres 2159 Percentage 54.0% Corp Property/ Flood Plain 790 19.7% Parks & Open Space 347 8.7% Vacant/ Underdeveloped 267 6.7% Lake Grapevine 311 7.8% Public / Civic / Religious 108 2.7% Commercial / Industrial 17 0.4% Totals 3999 100% Existing Land Uses Residential Corp Property / Flood Plain Parks & Open Space Vacant / Underdeveloped • Lake Grapevine Public / Civic / Religious • Commercial / Industrial DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 3 The map below illustrates existing conditions of the north area. The classifications are based on the Land Based Classification Standards (LBCS) model developed by the American Planning Association. This model extends the notion of classifying land uses by refining traditional categories into multiple dimensions, such as activities, functions, building types, site development character, and ownership constraints. Each dimension has its own set of categories and subcategories. These multiple dimensions allow users to have precise control over land -use classifications. MAP 3: NORTH SECTOR EXISTING LAND USES 1.2.2 Existing Zoning Existing Land Use Nwh Sector Flan Area Legend Noah Sector --- LFWAUpan Nalee camdar P. W.MlakAdmelec nun6 Wd Aa,,,U 51wppery ACIIYNet Pranmdy PI :mar FecAary.ryye Adaaeen p,ensrily Cwada stoma ar ..RN Ac, R.s ki School or [�c.a+y M Emugenry Raepenea ar NblY Sa1Wy Am,4 es A-4166 .4h Od".. Fno control Vanua and Omer W.-Stange 9141er Sdaeage Hsalh Cvc MWIal a Tmimenl AcKbes IMer—M a Cremanan AatvM Veh. war P. A'Mg. SI—ge. Ekc W"1. cowal W ftghgp i Ad" LCWN Sp Ill and ReMled ALIIMMS W PaWy . [-.arse A. -Y ry Fa ,r.g ar Lry 9-4 R ft d Acd,ff— is Human AdWy u Vnclass�ebM Acbydy Ssak- E:3904D Y m�1 =3900 ket [kyMenml (9 F'Irnrv) and Lk•+eAEr�eM &ems, asyy�:+xc rrN imaMiSy;Mm rrw � ••^• The north side area is zoned primarily agricultural or residential. Much of the agriculturally zoned property is park property or Corps of Engineers land. Residential zoning is mostly "SF1 -A" Single Family Residential District (1 acre lot size minimum), although many of the newer subdivisions, including Estes Park, Cliffs at Clariden Ranch and Oak Pointe, are zoned "RPUD" Residential Planned Unit Development. There are some smaller residential lots in the sector that are zoned "SF -20B" Single Family Residential District (20,000 sq. ft. lot size minimum), such as the Dove Estates and South Lake Park subdivisions. In addition, "MH" Manufactured Housing District zoning is found along the northern end of T.W. King Road. DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 4 1 ,� 11 i �4 rW.• eMare.•,+a a 1.2.2 Existing Zoning Existing Land Use Nwh Sector Flan Area Legend Noah Sector --- LFWAUpan Nalee camdar P. W.MlakAdmelec nun6 Wd Aa,,,U 51wppery ACIIYNet Pranmdy PI :mar FecAary.ryye Adaaeen p,ensrily Cwada stoma ar ..RN Ac, R.s ki School or [�c.a+y M Emugenry Raepenea ar NblY Sa1Wy Am,4 es A-4166 .4h Od".. Fno control Vanua and Omer W.-Stange 9141er Sdaeage Hsalh Cvc MWIal a Tmimenl AcKbes IMer—M a Cremanan AatvM Veh. war P. A'Mg. SI—ge. Ekc W"1. cowal W ftghgp i Ad" LCWN Sp Ill and ReMled ALIIMMS W PaWy . [-.arse A. -Y ry Fa ,r.g ar Lry 9-4 R ft d Acd,ff— is Human AdWy u Vnclass�ebM Acbydy Ssak- E:3904D Y m�1 =3900 ket [kyMenml (9 F'Irnrv) and Lk•+eAEr�eM &ems, asyy�:+xc rrN imaMiSy;Mm rrw � ••^• The north side area is zoned primarily agricultural or residential. Much of the agriculturally zoned property is park property or Corps of Engineers land. Residential zoning is mostly "SF1 -A" Single Family Residential District (1 acre lot size minimum), although many of the newer subdivisions, including Estes Park, Cliffs at Clariden Ranch and Oak Pointe, are zoned "RPUD" Residential Planned Unit Development. There are some smaller residential lots in the sector that are zoned "SF -20B" Single Family Residential District (20,000 sq. ft. lot size minimum), such as the Dove Estates and South Lake Park subdivisions. In addition, "MH" Manufactured Housing District zoning is found along the northern end of T.W. King Road. DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 4 MAP 4: NORTH SECTOR ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS Zoning North Sector Ran Area Legend i C;1 �G2 ^E �C3 <91A ! r4 NR.FUD HC 61 tiR FQ 5F20e 11 R -Plic 12 - MF1 - MF2 ® $F'1 - MN pi o' Scef�e - 5.:360(14 1 wh= 3000 feet WWC-W 11 -W?" b60.e4N nwa�.wo.waas+.mm rw aG>•1nwnld Flanmp 1.2.3 Demographic Summary There are approximately 5,730 people and 1,747 households in the north sector. The median lot size is almost one acre, and the median property value is just over $400,000. TABLE 2: NORTH SECTOR DEMOGRAPHIC SUMMARY Total Population 5,730 Total Households 1,747 Median Property Value $ 402,800 Median Living Area 3,579 sq. ft. Median Lot Size 0.99 acre Net Density 0.9 du /acre DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 5 1.2.4 Recent Development Changes The most significant developments in the sector in the past few years have been the Estes Park subdivision and other smaller subdivisions, such as Cotswold Valley and Wimbledon Estates, which have changed the character of the southern part of the area adjacent to properties along the SH 114 corridor. MAP 5: RECENT (5 YEAR) DEVELOPMENT SINCE SOUTHLAKE 2025 ADOPTION LU W 1 9 ©2030 EH° HLANb Si' Legend O North Sector Boundary - Recent Development A su� n fimo-,. wry �w �d �s.rma sm+.+�s inn epx�les. LM Urc grcWUbrprrrplm m ins m.o+rs am, s�arf[e m ne. p[a<>na de. ¢�xs mmanma mw arc rn.rwx.w.+npnwro msrasgm [ arses w� xwa rerpk Rpaarrorb lh[&WFHk�7r4S PHn xd [I an eaxpd�W nMemc la sOfOonm rNmmmwn pl®:µtE0. DO Created 02 25 �.aanaar ` ®eparbrmg of Planning re ` r.� weam 0 2!700 4.000 8.009 and i)ewelop— nt Services Feet Geographic Gnf—ti- Systems .ea ter As a result of the additional residential development, traffic counts in the area have increased in the last few years. The segment of N. Carroll Ave. between Highland St. and Dove Rd. saw a 42% increase in daily trips from 2006 to 2009, although some of that increase was due to construction traffic. Daily trips DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 6 on Highland St. between Kimball Ave. and N. Carroll Ave. increased by 24% during the same time period. Traffic counts on roads farther to the north have remained relatively stable. Another recent change in the north sector was the opening of the Bob Jones Nature Center and Preserve in 2008. Located on East Bob Jones Road, the nature center and preserve is a City of Southlake park that hosts a variety of events and programs, such as bird walks, star parties (in partnership with the Fort Worth Astronomical Society), guided hikes, a camera club and much more. As such, the nature center and preserve attracts visitors of all ages from Tarrant County, Denton County and beyond. Although the City has not historically tracked traffic counts on East Bob Jones Road, the opening of the Bob Jones Nature Center and Preserve has likely increased daily trips on this roadway. A few properties in the sector remain that are undeveloped or have the potential for redevelopment. However, the primary objectives for planning in the north sector are the preservation and enhancement of the existing rural character and the preservation of natural areas. 1.2.5 Future Changes to the Area Beyond the existing development pattern, consideration must also be given to expected or proposed changes to the area. For example, build -out of approved subdivisions in the north sector will continue to change the character of the area. Anticipated changes from subdivision build -out include increased traffic counts and increased demand for city services. Another expected change in the north sector is the opening of a new city park, Liberty Park at Sheltonwood, along East Dove Road. The park is currently under construction and will include a pavilion, playground, wildflower meadow, pond, trails and parking. The opening of the park increases the need for sidewalks and trails along Dove Road to provide pedestrian access. At present, an 8 foot trail is planned for construction along the north side of Dove Road. Additional projects in the north sector that have been submitted as development cases and are currently under consideration include a Carroll Independent School District elementary school along North White Chapel Boulevard, a Department of Public Safety station and training facility along Dove Road and a public park along Dove Road. The sites where these developments are proposed require careful consideration in regard to land use designation and mobility recommendations. There are also impending developments in adjacent plan areas that will impact the north sector, such as a new middle school, the Carillon development and Gateway Church: • Carroll Independent School District Middle School: A zoning change, site plan, and final plat have been approved for a new Carroll Independent School District middle school that will be located on the south side of the 1800 block of East Highland Street. This school is expected to replace the existing Carroll Middle School located at the northwest corner of North Carroll Avenue and East Dove Street. The existing Carroll Middle School will become administrative offices for the Carroll Independent School District. The construction of the new school increases the need for sidewalks near Highland Street to provide pedestrian access. Carillon: Carillon is an approximately 285 acre mixed use development at the northeast corner of N. White Chapel Boulevard and S.H. 114 that is planned to include retail, office and residential uses as well as an arts center. DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 7 Gateway Church: Gateway Church is constructing a new facility adjacent to S.H. 114 between N. Kimball Avenue and N. Carroll Avenue. Phase I will include a 4,000 seat auditorium, a bookstore and coffee shop, classrooms and children's play area. The development also includes construction of two new roads (Grace Lane and Blessed Way). DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 8 2.0 Planning Challenges and Issues Protection of the north side area's distinct character is not without its challenges. New development, particularly in the form of public facilities such as the middle school and elementary school, a park, and a north side DPS facility are planned. While these types of facilities are needed to serve the population, integrating them into the existing character of the area and providing vehicle and pedestrian access is critical. In addition, completion of Kirkwood Boulevard will present new challenges that the north sector has not faced before. Kirkwood Boulevard is a four lane divided roadway that runs along the length of the City east to west, north of SH 114. The facility is designed to improve traffic flow and safety and allow residents to access schools, shopping, parks and neighborhoods without having to utilize SH 114. Currently, portions of this roadway are being built in conjunction with the Gateway Church project and a portion of the roadway exists today on the Sabre campus. Development along this roadway is anticipated to be less intense than S.H. 114 and F.M. 1709 in terms of commercial and retail development. In addition, this roadway will serve as an entryway to the north and must be designed in a manner that respects the rural character of the northern areas of the City. A regional transportation project, the DFW Connector Project, is also expected to impact the north sector. This 8.4 -mile, $1.02 billion project includes reconstructing and expanding the S.H. 114 and S.H. 121 interchange and building continuous frontage road lanes along S.H. 114 between William D. Tate Avenue and Northwest Highway. The project also includes adding an approximately 4 mile section of tolled managed lanes to S.H. 114 that will run roughly from near S.H. 26 to just east of the Tarrant County /Dallas County line. In order to access the tolled managed lanes heading eastbound, drivers will need to access S.H. 114 no later than Kimball Avenue. This will likely increase traffic volumes on N. Kimball Avenue during peak AM as a result of Grapevine citizens utilizing N. Kimball in the morning to access the DFW Connector managed facilities. Another unique challenge in the north sector is the appropriate use, development and conservation of the parkland and Corps of Engineers land in the area. The north sector is home to the Bob Jones Nature Center and Preserve, the largest City park within the City. The Bob Jones Nature Center and Preserve is also a partnership of the Bob Jones Nature Center organization (a 501c3 nonprofit) and the City of Southlake. The City has also entered into a lease for 218 acres of U.S. Corps of Engineers property, purchased an adjacent horse ranch and an additional 30 acres at the far end of E. Bob Jones Road with lakefront access. Altogether the Bob Jones park and adjacent Corps of Engineer's property represents nearly 500 acres of prime native Cross Timbers habitat. The Nature Center will play a critical role in the education and preservation of a prime remnant of the Cross Timbers region. Along with the adopted Vision, Goals and Objectives of the Southlake 2030 Plan, these challenges and issues serve as the basis for many of the recommendations outlined in the following chapters. DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 9 3.0 Land Use Recommendations In the context of comprehensive planning, "land use" typically refers to future land use designations as shown on the Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use Map illustrates the desired location and distribution of land uses throughout the City, as opposed to the Existing Land Use Map (discussed in Section 1.2.1) which shows how land is currently being utilized. As such, the Future Land Use Map is an important visual tool used by city decision - makers, city staff, developers, and citizens to understand the community's desired development pattern. Using the Southlake 2030 Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives as a guide and taking the challenges and issues identified in the previous chapter into consideration, the Southlake 2025 Plan Future Land Use Map was reviewed for sites that may require land use designation changes. Several sites were identified for a land use designation revision, primarily due to development changes that have occurred or are expected to occur in the near future. The following maps highlight the areas with recommended land use designation changes. The numbers on the maps correspond to the reference numbers in the table that follows the maps. DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 10 MAP 6A North Sector Pla Area unaenying Lana use Kecommenaatlons LU � _* - Z , [)30 G ft 2 Y Legend F 608. NES RD � North Sector Boundary Ve BOEFJ'-NES RD Recommended Land Use Changes Future Land Use a 100-Year Flood Plain i Corps of Engineers Property - Public Park /Open Space ® Public /Semi- Public a Low Density Residential Mediurn Density Residential Office Commercial ', n Retail Commercial w Mixed use Town Center Regional Retail ' Industrial c'e rrr:•- Rr � rarta h wriFxYSnvrm ll:m kwl ml viredildn nniq riwJ:limve i•ALIh mrirag d &id ho W apes. The... id.* dia preset A. an Mreerep e¢e myid rded 1. be e. R,vJv:iN vlu elpyuln: i�ndlure: r+c� c we charges while e h, . e ng 1'+ rvmr�d} In ;I kaRs rpin Prop n:lvoik. 1141 S Reesere.W a6z6wke Mrl. F. eddbmd vk. b.. DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 11 D�WK flele Gmaled 01-72-A10 mr aa,. an pdeal rnr MM m. �W " Departdnerd of Plannnfd va+ m Nom aim U 2.000 4,000 8.000 and Ueveloprnent Services Feet GeographlG l rfoRnal ion swen15 nar Fdumwanwgy d�dm DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 11 MM North Sector Plan Area uptionai Lana use Kecommenamons w® J °2030 Y F BGB . UN ES RD W BOB J:AES RD a w I ti d . Legend North Sector Boundary Recommended RemovaN Recommended Additions RC T -1 T -2 EC -1 EC -2 M EC -R E HV- HLANL. � r W341 WK J OHle [ 01- 1:?-:1t710 T d*WE. c r dr rN `, �mwwk a dw.m Dcparlmcrn cAPlannng it 2.006 4,060 8.066 and Development Feet Gmgraphlclrtonnal ion Systerrs - �e.wvwaumne «r�r, r The land use recommendations are outlined in the following table. The numbers in the first column of the table are references to the numbers in the preceding two maps. The second column provides a brief description of the issues specific to the site and the third column provides recommendations to address DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 12 rx�e kmipelrmmekhn ahel eul nrtliliin mniy nyJ.iivr.�er i�dLl:li mYinBdffiid hoWaias. The seas identified fa prASbraSOn m tin rreperem irtDI&dbhea q a 114 ` -, aaJe:�nl ^aleeprnlif•�mdlnr4 nary warm[ chmges wN6 erryhaAaig mr Wy loabgv W—p— ,I—,k neese0.i. the 9u01Ae N25 R. hr eddiimel iddmretim. E HV- HLANL. � r W341 WK J OHle [ 01- 1:?-:1t710 T d*WE. c r dr rN `, �mwwk a dw.m Dcparlmcrn cAPlannng it 2.006 4,060 8.066 and Development Feet Gmgraphlclrtonnal ion Systerrs - �e.wvwaumne «r�r, r The land use recommendations are outlined in the following table. The numbers in the first column of the table are references to the numbers in the preceding two maps. The second column provides a brief description of the issues specific to the site and the third column provides recommendations to address DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 12 the issues. The implementation metric in the fourth column is a quantifiable goal with a specified deadline for achievement. The "Strategic Link" and "VGO Tie" relate the issues, recommendations and implementation metrics to Strategic Focus Areas from the City's Strategy Map and to specific objectives from the adopted Southlake 2030 Vision, Goals and Objectives. The "VNT Link" column relates the issues and recommendations to the guiding principles of the Vision North Texas document, North Texas 2050. The final column provides the abbreviation for the department(s) that will take the lead on the implementation of the recommendations. This format is followed for all the recommendation tables in this plan. DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 13 N Z O a 0 Z S W S G G O U W W N 0 Z a J } V W N O Z M W J m a y +� C E c t v, V) CL O m a a CL w w � o 0 N l0 N Y U O L z CL LU CL c w O 4-;' c 4-;' c v v Y E E CL a J O O U y > U > U 1 L > > C O O r-I n ++ f6 ON D U C c 4' N N � J J E C v O_ > Q E N O_ c O N Q L E m E co Q a a - O 5 p c f E c > p " 2 41 C 0 Q Q L O u v O .Y 11 (6 >' N Q N m-0 m U (O m U U vUi O 7 L O C a 0 d a 0 d O �n E c c} a E +� E c 0 E ao " v t t v to c u w c° v ao o v E co •v t p p U 7 J ++ a (n N t c 7 ++ d U d a c = 7 an d 7 p U O N 0- -j O j L c V) C c0 O L m N U m rl N Q d •� f0 O N Q x 0 U co L C 0 y p O CL tLo u C Q �O +U+ +U+ Q L N 0 E O J in w U "a Z � J a v • • • • • Z J J J C a L U S � i O z N � N Q a y +� � w C E 0 t D V) V) D O m CL a a a CL w w � o 0 P oo �.6 v v v Y C U f6 U f6 U f6 J CL CL CL Z > f6 f6 f6 7 7 7 4-;' C 4-;' C 4-;' C N N N Y E E E C2 C2 C2 J O O O U M co > v U > v v m N nj in U in L N O n n 0 r 1 U U O D } C 6 4' J — J �* J Cf E E c C N > CL N > CL >� Q. C O C O C-0 Q L CL Q L Q Q) Q — a a a — O > O "a to i1 _. > U U_ "a to C O L C a; O f0 _ C O E O " N c O a a"1 Q d C2 , U > j '}, O C f0 .� f6 'V { n v C2 7 N L O- � a U ++ f6 N O " E f0 vi O c ++ > O c _ . w +� 0 c •}, J N - a N C p p �n .+' — C O Q U c0 c h0 Q •� �n O o (O 0 C L O ++ • �n -0 N to V) co t •in U ++ C t V) C CL � "a N E E'- u n E c > u t O c ++ n c O> _ > +� y d U O O Ln U a E U c O O 0 bA E - - 2 a C 0- 0 E a .� E a U �' _O a o 7 m a v ° ++ 3 N N c +' a u a a O c N m a° +± 3 t N 3: ++ O Q O ^ N U O — 7 t]A 0 U C ++ - 0O p 7 . , U c0 ,� .}, c0 m O m > Q to l0 C C o ' FU E C C o E o d b.0 N O m p rl 11 O L _ 0 O Q ++ C o " C m N N +' C M 7 N J CL L �, CL C M N L U J n- U ++ {n N ++ !n J �' L (O CO W 0 Z J J J LO v a CL a L U S C) z� � N Q a y +� � w C E 0 t D V) V) C CL M a a a a w w � o 0 '.6 �.6 �.6 v v v Y C U f6 U f6 U f6 J d d d - > f6 f6 f6 7 7 7 4-;' C 4-;' C 4-;' C v v v Y E E E CL a a J O O O U N m N m N m 1 L C 0 r 0 r I O 0 'n 0 'n 0 = = = m ,U >- >- LL >- G) ' Cc C J v C J C N J Cf - a a a 75 g o O O °1 v v E c v E c v N C N O> N O> oC t °1 v U O U O U • • ( L �n •v N f0 U O .� N N 72 72 . O C `v ` F O O 0 c O_ N • C Ln U Q O i Q Gl C C O m N rN C �' p f0 m C ++ +�+ O U C (6 . C 0 C C 7 C � C C C O C « C Ew O �°u E� Q �°°J oZ c o ` ` 7 ++ N O N Q- 2 C -a 7 O O N N LA N j U L v 7 7 O -a J c C O h0 v O o E a L c ' c> n c J im U > a > � o U cc °1 J G O a > , U !n U cc J G (O C O "a U W Q U 0 = Z J J J v a CL a L U S O z� � N Q a k � C 5 CL _ _ CL � o o e » » a a @ / _ / E\ C » § k ƒ \ / / / k k ? \ e a) u � \ k k § \ \ a a _ ® _ ® /� �/ \/ ƒ a) CL a) CL \ / \ / � : E § § 0 ! r m = r m J u / J u / \ \ % 7 m I 3 ; § § _ : .g ./ \ 2 ƒ § 7 ° © 0 _ — a§ _ m f k — t 7= / § s 2 k\� t�� b.0 J m M u _ _ _ f 0 \ = e = 2 \ — k$ \� .g E M = .� % .g ��— / ® �>kg \» ® ��(/ 3 2 § ± / « \ ƒ $ § Z # k \ / r / 3 r > M 2 \ / � r \ ° � / > 7 _@ o G o 7 o @ o W 7 = o = u = _ in CL 2 = u _3 _ z _ u _ >� } k j j & � \ CL / / \ N A \ ® \ k 4.0 Mobility Recommendations "Mobility" refers to the City's transportation network and includes automotive, pedestrian, bicycle and other alternative modes of transportation. Over the past several decades, the physical, social and economic success Southlake has experienced can be attributed in part to the City's transportation network. The highways, streets, paths, railway and proximity to the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport that provide mobility within the City and access to points beyond have caused Southlake to transition from a relatively isolated community at its incorporation to a premier City in the DFW Metroplex and beyond today. However, the same transportation network has also created adverse side effects: traffic congestion due to regional travel patterns, increased pollutant emissions and high stress levels due to commuting. Despite the north sector's rural characteristics, the area is still faced with these mobility issues. 4.1 North Sector Transportation Network The north sector of Southlake is characterized by more rural thoroughfares when in comparison to other areas of the City. The primary east west corridors through this sector are Dove Road and Bob Jones Road. The primary north south corridors consist of T.W. King Road, White Chapel Boulevard, N. Carroll Avenue and Kimball Avenue. The City will have two new traffic circles in the study area constructed by the fall of 2010. These facilities are located at Carroll Avenue and Dove Street and White Chapel Boulevard and Dove Street. A portion of Kirkwood Boulevard (Kimball to the Gateway Church site) has recently been completed and is open to the public. The City will extend Kirkwood Boulevard to Highland prior to the opening of the new Middle School. The City is also planning to begin the widening of Kimball Avenue from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from SH 114 to Patterson Pond Rd (Phase 1) in 2010. Phase II of the Kimball Ave. widening project (Patterson Pond to Dove St.) is planned at a later date depending on funding availability. The City of Southlake places a high priority on sidewalks and trails for both mobility and recreation. Currently the City has an approved Sidewalk Pathways Plan which indicates the location of future DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 18 sidewalk facilities in the City and priorities these facilities for construction. Also, the City of Southlake ensures construction of sidewalks by the following actions: 1) allocates approximately $400,000 annually for the construction of trails and sidewalks in the CIP (Capital Improvements Program); 2) seeks grants for funding; 3) requires new development to construct sidewalks along public streets adjacent to the site; 4) implemented the sidewalk matching program (a 50% cost sharing program for the design and construction of sidewalks within neighborhoods); and 5) implemented the Sidewalk Partnership program (promotes the dedication of easements by citizens and business for the construction of sidewalks). Although there are sidewalk segments along Dove Road, N. Carroll Avenue and N. White Chapel Boulevard, most of the major roadways in the north sector lack sidewalks and trails. The sidewalk segments that are in place are not contiguous and as such do not provide an effective pathways network. Despite the lack of sidewalks along roadways, the north sector has an impressive network of hiking and equestrian trails (totaling approximately 15 miles) on City parkland and on Corps of Engineers property. The City's planned pedestrian and bike path network is intended to provide connections between schools, shopping centers, parks, work and residential areas. With the proposed addition of an elementary school along N. White Chapel Boulevard, the construction of Liberty Park at Sheltonwood, the proposed construction of a city park along Dove Road and ongoing residential construction in and around the north sector, pedestrian mobility is becoming an even more critical issue in the area. 5.2 North Sector Mobility Recommendations In coordination with the Vision, Goals & Objectives, adopted by City Council in November 2009, the following table lists the recommendations for the north sector plan area regarding mobility. For a description of each column heading, please refer to the legend that following the table. DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 19 N Z _0 a 0 z 5 W L 0 U W OC J_ m C 0 G 0 ri LLI 2 H OC 0 4 W J m a H W +' C c E o m a a CL V) V V w N � M Ql l0 Ql lh O M M M rl 0 i--I Ln r-I Ql Ln r-I M M M M C � O O — — C `? Q O U O w a '� > ` z U O O Q 7 a in w O C7 � f0 i f0 i f0 i > a1 +' > a1 +' > U E o u m E o u m E o 41 v v v L N - to (O ,U M 0 C > N U - to (O ,U (LO 0 C> - to 0 (M6 0 (O ,U C > 0 c cc L C a C � U cc cc L C a C V) U cc Q C a c L C V) U U • a1 N L > > O 0) Q1 ''J L Q 0 a i--I b.0 O '-� a1 v t3.0 U t U O C C N W +' O_ � 2 41 w t3.0 L N M a) ++ ,~ +' O O X w f0 ' L a1 L-0 a CL X O 7 C E C O t O > Y a1 C L C ++ N Q c Q N M O O 0 0 Ln al +' N Y co E U •+� U O 0 C t O 'a U "� f0 L N ' "a L N h.0 U a1 Q- E •v a, E V) O M p �, • 0 0 LL = L _ O E t O Q O Q O U �n +' a U U U +' — c O O c O O •++ '� _ O O Q '••� O t •++ 0 O 7 a1 L y� O v t O > a a) U 7 N O L > > c0 (O a > a1 ++ -aa +' a1 o = �n U O C u C °' +' > c Q ° o C 0 C Q U C .. "Q Q L f0 to "a 0 (O -a "a m E t Y O r co E w E Q *�' E o a, U O N U i T 2 c0 t]A N s L E O_ N _ _ U U _ 2 U +' i Y E u O i L O '� u • • • L O o z E 0 j Y L �H Q a 0 L �H Q U O a 0 co U a) in +�' v 0 '� c E B ++ L U f0 H N h0 O 4 "a O O O > O a1 to 0 0 L Q U O � m -a > y o C O Q) 0 a, 0 ai =_ U v 3 Q) O v {� C v 7 3 m a u U a1 L + Y X u U t ns i a1 c c c +, U N c S N Q c Q — U O E c v 0 O m u u > +, > +; X a1 N (O a1 t C b0 v v � v CL Q) c t�if a1 a1 w t]A m m m > U N O >' > u -O +�+ D -0 N a1 _a Q O_ t a, a, O a1 °' ns E U E +, ns v O Q H a m �' c H +�' E Y co .E Y ns + C7 a m t . z r14 m 75 2 2 C a L U Ll s C) zr%4 � N U Q a C W +' � a m N V cn V V G1 OC O a a a a U w H N rl M M n M n O M M M M M M M > '--I r, N N r-I Ln Ql r Ln m M M rl i--I M M M M M M M O O lie a, LUO W =•� Lu > • O N . N .� .� N •� Q- v v a Q o v v o g o Q) Q o Lu O a o a o a o O U a in Y -a N U -a C > N U "O J N N �p '••� i N N _ N N f0 i +' U > > C > _ 0 cc '�+ N + Q > _ U N E Q = 7 E N N 41 +' E � +—' E m +' E f0 +L+ w t O " w ++ + ' h0 41 N cL6 �O ' j U M ' j U 7 ( ( C > a V) U a V) U V) a U cn cn •L L C n N C C C C Q O CL N m -0 L i Q " C O O a m o O O O E C •LQ to L '••� Q) C C C w `� Q. N 0 L O U U N 0 L O N 0 L O N L O E a N Q - a N - a N - a N a LL m a LL a LL a LL N Ln _ Ln v {n t Y '••� Y L C v Ln Y '•' O L L I O O f0 _ N ' L O O C O O N •U C N Q ' C • U +' . f6 Y (O O N f0 ��., In f0 • C *' •� O L 4- - f6 g > > -a C +' U f6 p '••� to L Q N •L +' f0 f0 C p Y -a N L '••� 3 }' N N _ N Q "a O c ++ O CL N O Y i N U m N "a }' �n ++ U N C� F 7 U O N m N U U f0 > O Q p 3: t10 ' L �' N {n Q t M Q L +' C U C N M 0 L N '� > '•' h 0 'C - a 7 N L N L N "a Q- v N >� "a_ O O 'C p >, +' N Q E N h0 CL Q) U y "a O L C m of "a Lu O in "a b0 3: p��� co a v +' C co N co C h0 N U E U "a E E :2 N Z E C N ' .E v .� cCO c -0 O O O O t >, N Q en C "a Ln - '••� C N Q L O O L1 f0 L i C C to U L1 Q N f0 f0 N L U Q N 41 N N q U1 a G1 h0 b.0 "a O ' f6 � N L f0 3 > N C N L • f0 a => •>' '.' C C '••� '••� C— X C Q- '••� U C Y_ U 7 Q N p Q Q "O N Q >' CO O Q >' E w O t N >, N U N' C Q N U Q L V 0 v O N 1 U to to > C O U O E N a 0 N N "a L U° v o ° Q m u m a a P E E z v° c'o E a a w z 00 2 H N v a CL C a L U z� � N Q a \ E § ( / f k 2 \ / k g E CL / CL 0 E E 2 $ ) } , / § » 2 % 1 / z o ± ) ƒ f /' / u ( £ t E Q e / / E f f / o e E 2 E $ \ o 0 > ƒ © u ƒ E 2 .\ ® 2 { / / t E- j c w E / ) % / •� o § ƒ E s u ± ®/ $ .E E 3 = 2 / k { $ •/ E / & 2 5 2 0 -O ? \ # w o . e -E @ ƒ \ ® ^ { .V) » x M £ LU § ƒ t / / s 7 • -� R \ e k \ / ) 3 \ d # C: \- W 'n/ o = -P � .\ 2 4 .g E 'E o e 0 y / / \ 4- e > e = § e 2—) E e\ E_ 2 •0- -a m < B ± E _ •© -0 ƒ § } e 0 0 = u E �� E o e 7 / m E \ \ 0 � / ƒ E 'e = < = % �� 3 0 £ '_ •- ® g E �� _ 0 \ k ƒ / .2- �� / ./ u $ e e o — » 'e ® ) - a u _ o c e e a C G 2 ƒ / ƒ 2 " .1d o -0 < 0) r I I E § ■ ■ _ & o u \ 0 S M o C'± E ® a 2 2 § > \ — $ 2 \ E § ( / f k 2 5.0 Environmental Resource Recommendations Environmental sustainability is vital to the current and long term financial health of the City and the physical and emotional health of area residents. As such, the City of Southlake places a high priority on the protection and conservation of the community's natural assets. "Environmental resources" in this section primarily refer to natural amenities, such as trees, water, soil, air, and wildlife. A more detailed discussion on sustainability, including topics such as energy use, waste reduction, and recycling, may be found in the Sustainability Plan. The primary environmental resource issues in the North Sector are protection and conservation of the Cross Timbers, tree protection, and wildlife management, as discussed below. 5.1 Cross Timbers Ecosystem Southlake is part of the Cross Timbers ecosystem, an ecological region that spans from southern Kansas to Central Texas. The Cross Timbers is characterized in part by Post Oaks, Blackjack Oaks, Cedar Elms, American Elms and grasslands and is home to a diversity of wildlife. Throughout this document, "Cross Timbers habitat" and "natural landscape" will be used interchangeably. The North Sector is unique in that it is bordered by Lake Grapevine and has the largest concentration of uncultivated Cross Timbers habitat in the City. Although much of this habitat was significantly altered by the construction of Lake Grapevine in the 1950s and from other human activities, it has developed naturally into a vibrant and diverse environment. This uncultivated, natural landscape is primarily found on Corps of Engineers land and undisturbed park property. The natural areas in the North Sector vary considerably, from sandy, rocky shoreline (adjacent to Lake Grapevine) to heavily wooded areas with intermittent meadows. Key Points to Consider • The Corps property around Lake Grapevine provides wildlife corridors between adjoining cities. • The wildlife habitat around Lake Grapevine is unique and distinct. • There is a significant concentration of relatively undisturbed natural landscape. • The presence of the Bob Jones Nature Center and abundance of relatively undisturbed natural landscape provide unique opportunities for natural resource education. 5.2 Tree Protection Trees provide a multitude of benefits, such as reducing air pollution, improving water quality, moderating climate, reducing erosion, supplying food and shelter for wildlife, providing beauty and DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 23 increasing property values. Southlake recognizes the importance of trees and strives to protect, maintain, and enhance the City's urban forest. Although the City has always valued its trees, increased emphasis has been placed on tree protection in recent years as the City faces build -out. For example, certain areas with significant tree cover were identified as areas recommended for preservation with the approval of the Southlake 2025 Environmental Resource Protection Plan in 2005. In addition, the City's tree protection regulations were strengthened through the adoption of a new Tree Preservation Ordinance in 2006. The Tree Preservation Ordinance was further amended in 2007 to require the posting of the approved Tree Conservation Plan at all construction sites. These efforts have not gone unnoticed. In 2006, Southlake received the Project Planning Award for the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance from the Midwest Section of the Texas Chapter of the American Planning Association. That same year, the Cross Timbers Urban Forestry Council selected the Southlake 2025 Plan for their Urban Forestry Award. In addition, the City has received Tree City USA certification for 12 years and 11 Growth Awards from the National Arbor Day Foundation. Despite these advancements, there is still much work to be done to improve tree protection within the City and Southlake is always considering options to improve the protection and maintenance of the urban forest. By working with developers, builders, engineers, landscape architects and homeowners we can preserve the integrity of the Cross Timbers and create a sustainable environment for the trees and the community. As discussed previously, the North Sector has an abundance of trees. Most of these trees are characteristic of the Cross Timbers ecosystem, including Post Oaks, Blackjack Oaks, Cedar Elms, American Elms, Hackberries, Pecans, and Cottonwoods. 5.3 Wildlife Management The abundance of native trees and vegetation as well as the proximity to Lake Grapevine make the North Sector an ideal home for many animal species. While most species are welcome to some degree, active management is sometimes required for any or all of the following reasons: • To protect human health and safety; • To minimize damage to the ecosystem due to unnaturally high numbers of a particular species or due to the presence of a non - native species; • To minimize damage to personal property; • To protect rare, threatened or endangered species. At present, the most common nuisance species in the North Sector is feral hogs. Examples of other species that are sometimes problematic include coyotes, beavers, foxes, deer, ducks, gophers, moles, rabbits, raccoons, skunks and opossums. DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 24 5.4 North Sector Environmental Resource Recommendations Based on the Southlake 2030 Vision, Goals, and Objectives and with consideration for the unique environmental features of the north sector, the following general environmental resource recommendations are proposed. For a description of each column heading, please refer to the legend that following the table. DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 25 LA Z O a 0 Z C W G O U W W U OC O N W J H Z W 2 Z O Z W I. O ri W N 2 O Ln W M J W ` a r y +' V) U E �p C vi a Q. m a Q- vi cn O D LU a ~ oo 14 Ln O vi ai �.o 0 l0 N m r-i Ln > Un l0 I C C Q U Q J N t m t H E E Z c L O m c L O m 3 v m � 3 v WV c1 WV C Ln E U C co E C J Q C U on L c a, m E m > v E a) �' > c° L a , L E a 41 a ' C O v) L m f 2c > m J v v � v o c o v c (n V) d m> d G m v r U �n J m c o Ln d m > U m V U o m cn a i6 Q O a1 N L m m a1 c vI LL v m 4 O t O m U E LL O a V) L a m Q >, Z , ++ Z� CL C Q_ - > w a U — a ° � 0 V o v 2 a U u Q 0 v v C E C f O OL O >- a1 m m a1 Q- f a1 � O O O_ c — m Q N Q U LL +`� �n O_ Q d O d W O d r U H m m V O U U U ++ c +m+ yj w _ L U .Ln X U L C p "O v m .+' a U C v +°! O t O a) 7 4 U z `n Ln m _ N +� +� *' a p n m +' m 'a L O O m ,�' O D E 7 w t Ln N U OL c 7 a E > • � {n m L Q m � 0 D E �_ L a O C U ( L CL O +� v Q O D • �n '+� N L L > i c V) > C m U O� U C • b.0 p Q C Q CL v Q c m a p E H O E CO h0 O c a; C a1 L O a1 a1 n a1 O m U C O Q O C C Q M :3 L L Q Q '� v mm w E N Q U w w m + C C O p a1 'gyp +' L m m ao 0 U N N O C E u L ao L C m C v v v Vl , M C m C C X W to m +� � m p E o L> +� p �, n . t +� to M C , au E c m O m (D O " +� CL U L C a1 m '-- C L v> L E z +� o +� W a1 a1 U ,� -0 p C C "' L cp E v p U C g U t 'c v m i >, a) O E Q a, m N c o(D F C m L m n m E m m CL Y �_ 7 E N U �b. L a1 "a Ln O OU O_ L1 1 O O m L 7 L L Q 3 W S W O Q U 0 t E O C Ln >. a1 ° J U Q t Q Q C-E v _ m m v) a 0 = .- o z 14 eq W W W a L U i O z � N Q a W ' � a C E O t CL M W w `) V ' V ' oc O ° Ln O (J Ln M N 00 n n n C C Q- U C Q- C Q- J a v t a !E H E E Z L > O f0 }' C L O f0 C L O f0 .; .> .> W V) W (n W (n Y � C J a ++ a U a a ++ a U a a U E co E 'U U 'pp Q a > >� a i >Z a O L w L O V) L ww a L O V) i f6 > LL > L - > •- a C7 in U a c C O m a in C O U > CJ � L1 rl C c�0 0 ++ i +�+ L a O C r t0 t0 H CI co —_ } C y ++ Q Q Q a ~ O L U !n a ++ t0 7 t0 E C a LL E O cp O > rl C C L N m a N y t U > N a C > a n - a ON Q ' 0A a "a a 0 _ - a '� "a .� O 6 m Q C r4 i to rl -0 L- U O m O Q l U Q +�+ m U a L- D U Q of a O L a v > a c0 •� L 0 m > a +� O L U a N O a U Q + a O a 7 i N U LO Q m +' d ' U i C O L c m � a t - a a v O . C C vi t u w 41 m 0 C 1 6 U M +L.I O > O On C (0 U 'a y Q O E • �n O O O U `~ � a a O c = a '++ a c .. n L Q +, a O f0 'a a O 2 {n Ln m - 0A - a L1 Q a +' O O a �_ �O 'a U a C O C L O O Q C O ++ +' C O +' U C �' ++ L C > PO U •Q a �n a E 0A 0A O •++ > O E O O L '� 0p a U N C C L a ++ O O c0 L s O O U a ++ U a f0 p O a L1 +°� a Q O U > "a 0 m w O_ c m Q CL 5 a- 0 • • • • C a a to �0 C i1 C 0 0 O C N C � 0 C (0 C O-O s U a a) a 3 ++ C O W S L L L O a w C E 0 0 >i vi a c E > a E o a L . _ L ° D a m E ° E E O a U a 0 a o a s co > L o o m ,n >" a L O a M a a k a — o> L L O a L O >' w 7-0 o 72 a a C 0 a to E> m Q C a C O L a o t� a O E t m O a a a 0 t a a U a H a a t e m U �� a° '� o a Or z W W LM W N v a CL C a L C) U O i O z N � N U Q a C w � a E C t V) O m C a w w ~ o r< o; 0 rq n O > ai C Q- m C Q- V C Q- C J a1 t U a1 t to E CL U a1 s to E CL U U Z > L O f0 L > O f0 }' L > L C O f0 •U N N — O N > w > w C7 > en w C7 w V) V V Y C +� U C 4-;' C ai C Ln E J a1 a1 c U a1 a) a +' E C2 en L '� i >, Q 7 `° o Ln W °' w w 41 L ao a L f6 a1 > O ++ > > L ± c Ln L > O > l� U > L U 41 (A c f6� CL G m in CO in W Ln V) CL m > U 0 L L 0 Ln CL CL R y t; (6 � -0 m -0 — m � + a ) LL c �:- u Ln m Ln c > L}L Ln c > a) C2 O •F - L1 a1 •� L1 a1 •� Q E i Ln r-I - a ++ 0 � rl E O f0 7 f6 O - a 7 f6 O a 7 f6 O — U C2 v) a N Q o V) a N Q o V) a N +� � O a) v c a) c a, a) L i0 Ln C U ,� 7 L Z Ln L O i 0 a1 O C to N "a m c O �n O a) m c L � a••� a••� to a••� N >� Ln a) t C_ t f0 f6 f0 c ++ t U O U L O ++ (6 a) •c to E O 'E +, +' +, - a L 4 O E ' a) L L a) t +, c a) L O a) en f0 ++ en OL pp L L {n ++ c0 m _ a, Cl IO m f0 C2 C ++ tH c 7 C ±' 7 C L a1 C to a' C c > > a1 L -0 �••� u C to •L .0 ++ a 3 O •� C C N a1 c c0 a1 a1 c U ±± 'a 3 O a) C +, m C2 O U Q' '0 t c to to E +, E c "a E • O a1 m U > C2 j {n c c c N 7 L u m E c O O m C2 C c O co �_ ++ t ++ L a) a) a) O > L T m +, > N - a a) v c a) a) a1 L O H a) ea ++ C • � - a m U L Q - O O_ a) ++ c c - a • � c L " a o c m N 3 E -0 c 7 -0 a) a1 E O O m to � to m 7 U a) f0 ++ " O c O U >, O a) E L aj b.0 C2 + C2 — a) M L en t UO V ++ � m . CZ E O a) a ++ vi L1 a) f U a 7 c > a) a ' �' c a1 ++ O en M M L a) C2 +� +' a1 a1 a) c U L O Q- m E +' en C U U L a O "a O c c0 c> c . c a) > U c0 "a a) c c c c0 co a) m 0 -0 72 '� t a) cc a) G - 0 O U O± a) - a c W - a c s O U O O M U c W - a Q U O L > > U m m m U U M M CL ++ c O O O a) W q U U - a • • • • • • • v (O O c L a -• m en a) C W N ++ 0 f0 'a O L 7.- `~ c +, L O v o v c E o - �+ U �' a -0-0 a) 3 +' L O v c a c a O E C co ° O L n U v v E v o U a c f6 O cO c c v m L to a) O c a t �, �, ns en v E - a E > L -O L C2 E c CZ O w O a1 U 3 7 a1 L c0 W O Q m C1 3 c 0 Ln "a .}' E N t 2� E a) t o f6 a -o at Q)) v" L, v o - a v ° o H ns - 0 L a V') 3 � m - 0 - L Q w .� w z W W W N aJ a CL a L O // Ll S O i O z � N U Q a C W *' y cn U a E C m Q. , a c„ o � °-' m M 0 > Y ° a C Q- C U a d U > U z > O (O } 7 N O U W V ) W Y C C E C U CL U E t U c N E ' N U N bb f0 >` CL i N E N i i W p N L bA N > Co L ++ lH V L > L� 7 L C �• 4 of N V) V) C7 a > a U L 0 � Q f0 N d -0 u cn (O w v N r-I f6 O — Q O cif a N L1 a" O ++ V W • N L Y O O0 +�+ to . ++ 'Q C f0 z G Q U � 7 E U « L N > 7 CL ++ .L 7 L •� a cn f0 c - a O U •� z - a � t a„� L O ++ f0 � O 7 to f0 Vl N . C �_ N '� O U h.0 •� O 'Z t >i ++ N +�+ C > a o L a ' ° +' +� 'E U tin to E u v c O v o N M U v en Q "a U 'n a 3 O_ g to m� O an +� to c O C E E N L "a 'a r O N ° U N M ++ N ,+ E ++ O N c f6 CO o v C N o Q UA t UA nu c en v L g O E N - Z t 4 O ° 16 ` V Q E E f0 N > f0 +-' 7 to v +' t +� f6 L O N N 7 C C >' ' C ao E .E O E • O i OU n c > i N c a a E j t OU i '� c E N tc C C ++ L a to n to O > O +, �O t C L "a t a i cn N c +�+ 7 N +� L ++ Q .— M M +' C cn L 7 "a C ++ N Q C f0 L n C E O +' O cn a..l N - 0 L t �' Q� O > N ++ L ++ L '' N L E L c Q C N O n Q n co a '+��+ ° +� L C a O 7 > N v N a +°� .> coo N c v O 7 cr Q O N m N ¢f O " 72 c_f = Q ?� �_ O j C O U "a Q U E� CC Lj N L — — "a O ++ Q •O _ U f0 "a 0 C o U C N f0 L U C > f0 V C W (p O ° U ° ° U U • U N "a O U t]A t m > W C ' M 7 "a C W O U ++ C N > N E > > W L 0 n E C U O c c c v O N N U U W U C 0 z W rn N v a CL a 0 // -I S O i O z � N U Q C a C C W c 0 M v C E C a a O m a C Q. V) y V N cn cn E E O U N L N C ~ M 00 N l0 M O N 0 M M I- le m 0 C N r > m m m I m r r-I vi O C N U O f lie f6 C: f6 f6 f6 � f6 C C Q- O s 4E C CL C Q- N a)t75; O j vt N N 4_+ z c E E E > O co N L •U O c c O cc L c O co L C L ? LU c s O 0 U +' (7 f6 4, (C6 C O 4O+ O W (n W O W (n W (n Y — N O vi m N 4- 4- O J c N CL E v U c N N c N c N N s +�+ N m • ba +�+ c E s s v co E Ln E E a-+ � f0 >, Q of C s i 0 N E N > i J Q Q N 4� O N tw $ Z - a C O OL L O Q f6 O 4' W + W �i > (6 N M N M C E w L s of V) V) C7 D a co > a cc O co C7 O co C7 O U c u O C i a� o E U- 0 E a U Eb j C i Q C a) U- _a E o +' m cf Q +>+ — _ f0 c � a"' u O C N C U y u ,n fo C p a) U ++ p 11 O cf d N N •� CL r-I f0 "a L t]A C C CO C M r N a a c ao U} 0 E L — 0 Q O cif d N J UL H V �F 3 L.L Q O Q N O O N v � C a C Y OC Ot N > > a O U 7 C N L vi > C m i L p f0 m N> to m L f0 C U +L+ C Q C n L L s ti C C a C > E '3 m v m s O c "a C Q U C Q N '++ , L ++ U 0 O s O 7 C Y E E N w C +L+ > Y ao m a L U O c a C O v '+� a p a a O f0 > O C u y O U ++ Q O S a0 '— +� co C C X N N N to N L N L O— E a L c c v > O 0 a N b0 c C M a C O Y U V U do U f6 ++ ++ v U E a U m tjo wQ) a N o E •++ N cn C O t + X O N C L O D O N Q C LU f0 O m" f�6 N ++ N ++ C +' M (O N U CL f0 O a •w o N O N h0 •� +' E— c X v N o o> to N N v o L f0 E O cn to N vi U C O a p v N U C +, p " C O LL v ° cCO v a c > i C '� N f0 n a v C E E L ++ a, C Z to co H OU v c a Q OU . C �O OU c io a E O t Lu D: z W W 0 M v C a a O C N E E O U N L N C O N 0 C � s E +' O E vi O C N U O f C: f6 � f6 s 4E N O j N N 4_+ s L U O : -0 4-; 0 Q ) 4 - a c C L LU c s O 0 U +' (7 f6 4, (C6 C O 4O+ O C GO N > L — N O vi m N 4- 4- O rj -a N 7 N m M � N s +�+ N m o s 3 s a-+ � U of C s i 0 M a) N 4� O N tw $ Z - a C O OL L O Q f6 O W + W �i > (6 a� C E w L s O m Q o +, a) -0 c u O a s a� E U- 0 E a U Eb j C Q C a) _a E o ° �� � u c � � C a Q. U � G CC l a) -a O o C p a) i+ N ++ p 11 O cf v CL O = 0 M r N a •� E z N E J UL H V �F 3 V CL 0 Q %-- � C a C Y OC Ot N > > M C C > a II cn Q U d � 7 C � O O (6 +: -O C C N a) E C L E t6 O a U a) � N s a tin C 'Z, C C a) a) E E a a) O CL a) E aa) ' o O U E O a) c: O O s U 4� L L yi U 4� L V�1 w +1 3 U L O C a � a E CL O a� O a� 0 E E co tin C O 7 U +� C C > a II cn Q U d � 7 C � O O (6 +: -O C C N a) E C L E t6 O a U a) � N s a tin C 'Z, C C a) a) E E a a) O CL a) E aa) ' o O U E O a) c: O O s U 4� L L yi U 4� L V�1 3 U L O 4 , � L O C C E E _s L E ' C O 7 U +� II 0 s U a L 0 O E U a Q. U v 0 I > I A O N in m z O U N ti CL i R Q a o cn 0 C 6.0 Pa Rec reation, a O p e n Sp ace With the Corps of Engineers property and Bob Jones Park, the North Sector includes the largest concentration of open space in the city. The area also includes several smaller parks and a joint use property, as shown in the following map and listed below. A complete discussion on each facility may be found in the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan. • Bob Jones Park, including Boo Boo's Buddies Dog Park • Bob Jones Nature Center and Preserve • Lonesome Dove Park • Liberty Park at Sheltonwood • North Park (undeveloped, official name to be determined) • Kirkwood -Sabre Linear Park (undeveloped) • Coker Property • Oak Pointe Park • Carroll Middle School (a joint use property) • The Cliffs Park • Corps of Engineers Property MAP 7: PARKS IN THE NORTH SECTOR WI y 3 City of Southlake North Sector Parks Locator Map Legend F.Me Parka comb of Ergin M Property - Gep"iW Lake110 -YR ROW P18M Parcel Becndane Soishlake City Lrrnif Oeek&MU& B6Ge8 x Scd a - 136009 1 i nth = 3000 feet OeWNe l d Ramng are Bau9gmm� Savxes Geegr�'hk IrdamiAea SysPemc w ssmaw.. wra.r otrr .e u.e#sM een.s �n. mr is per �w.Mnurcrt Fwr dwi w.. wn.aw...w rtrasm DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 32 In addition, the North Sector has a significant trail network on public park land and Corps Property that provides opportunities for recreational activities such as horseback riding, hiking, and bird watching. This network includes the Walnut Grove Trail System which connects Southlake to both the Town of Trophy Club and the City of Grapevine along Lake Grapevine. In recognition of its local and regional significance, the Walnut Grove Trail System was designated as a National Recreation Trail in 1991. City of Sauthlake Bob Jones Park Nature Center & Preserve Trail Map Hrkw, 1. Walnut Grove Trails Naomi RerfeafimJ Pak Hll M aarf Hxr cbaO iltolt g PraTs * E.O.p Traheak ---- Cry 1i" B—dary Wikng -d tq.e Iu- 1-K Cap€ MP" muk Pak. W. and V qJd- MFk.Fk. [11BGS,oPt�renx141us w: c key. Fx+ro>� r.[bf'e+n n 8mi M SI.- Cff -JI-L IreN U—d du rkrses'A'hea Viet 1 � �� 1i�d�:YYl4rs oaf: vnvj Yd Ixre4�raA'�orx DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 33 MAP 8: NORTH SECTOR TRAIL MAP Based on the Southlake 2030 Vision, Goals, and Objectives, the following parks, recreation and open space recommendations are proposed. For a description of each column heading, please refer to the legend that following the table. DRAFT North Sector Plan May 12, 2010 Page 34 N z O a z G W G G G O U W W U a a r� z W CL O 0 z a z O a W U W V1 Y OC Q a oc O U W r� N 2 1.1. O z lD W M J W ` 4 r y +a � w C E O t CL M a w v U U � N I� M r-I 00 O I-� 0l .4 n 0 Lr 00 a N M I-z n .4 n Ql Y 0 C Q- U 0- C Q- C J E d E O � z +� L o L O ` /; ; CL Q w V) C7 w V) w O M C J U f6 L U • w N CL CL N N C N C Q) f0 J >' O N +' 01 +' E w U 7 7 C m 41 j +�+ 7 C7 a > m +�+ a > a > V M U C v O 4 O d O L + U L Q) L f0 C 0J CO L z C L N ++ ++ Q f0 0J Ln C U Q f0 C 0J U f0 E c O C m V O m to Y Q O U to V to Y O m Q- C d Q {n V) m w W f0 W V) 0 L "a 0J U 0J C ++ Q) CL 'a 0J U 0J O C Q O a z Q O U L 0 a O �n O t0 �n 01 U m O .CL O N 7 m v a; +' CL c E° Q) E C c C O f6 - W w O w 7 m m v L f0 0A N 0A N d U .-o +, E v 0 v c o C o "O N 7 � " — O O 0J +� Q O C L 7 o ns ns E_ Q) z ns W U ns ++ i ns C O Gl C 7 H �n f0 O U vs en i 0A 01 ,C 01 ++ C f0 C i m i O C O O C w w U C OU S w N U u U m O_ ++ N u L •� 0 -. O C t 0p 01 Q 01 V) O � m « t f0 01 +� L O en C {n m 0A L L N U L N 01 O C .� "O 0 N 01 f6 0A {n N L O +�+ ++ a O '+� ' L w ns 0) E Q - — O C O m z O N U m O m L m a _ C 0J L ++ O U C 0 L 0 +�+ 0 t U L O f0 L �, Y L f0 U •� ._ to m w z C O — V) CO .O Q CL U O ' �..) U U 01 C b.0 z ri I N a a LO M aJ a CL a L O -I i O z N � N Q C a � C y +� � w E C O t CL M a w w U U U a/ M i U. O0 � I n Ql r-I M 0 Y C CL C CL C Q- C a) t v t a) s J E E E c c c z O (O O (O O (O L L L c �- c f• c W V) W V) W V) he I c i c i M - f0 ++ a1 f0 ++ a1 CO J E c > C E a) c > c V •� U 'L 'L U t N f0 E o J t a1 f6 E J E 4••1 L w E a) N ++ w a1 i � � N ++ a) w a1 a +> > 0 L c 0 f0 U m L C C 0 f0 (� m ++ —_ 41 N L L > ++ 7 tH c > 76 > N cc d> d C V) U d> d cc� G� U c O0 O G L }� O O O O c U m i+ i "a f0 i "a f0 a1 U a� ,1 U C L f0 c d a co f0 c a co d O L1 a C d co y +a N N to cu o cu N ate••, 7 E Y E N c U E w V O m L a (O V O (O a O u a O m a a a V) w a) V) a] Z V) a) L d c a1 L d a1 c L C c a 0 a 0 to a 0 a o 0 r- Q) C 70 •O u f0 a •� E CL lH 1n O • C g c 0 (� �, 3 .� ++ +L+ c .- a) Y > c a C *zl m 0 •� -a m a••1 v c O (U �~ W > v .�' C a f0 W c m a1 CL Q) LO 0 E N U Q) O 7 > b +�+ o w •� CL O c0 C a E t ++ L ns C d c O ++ c X L 7 U a a) 7 'a a) E U ++ 0 L1 W c U > OL to O U +, N L c O L O a a c L CL U O 0 • • O • O_ N U u j p a) N t c > 7 a a) a "O U + t + Y — > �' O w c w c > i = w 0 O E C7 n m m t O (6 U O = m L O U Q a1 f�6 tUif W a1 Ln N O O ns ns CL s v C w v w CL O a) E c c 0 O U C a) Q io v c 'a C E �, °1 v c C: Q) u a •0 RIM a 7 L" M w a CL C a L U Ll O z� � N Q a k � E \ C L k / CL ƒ 0 ° u ) § ! ® E \ 2 E @ > ƒ > ) e } u ? 2 % § 2 t > — / k z o u 7 & � ° 2 k /' / E 0 £ t E Q e (in S CL k ° f E © § \ \ ƒ \f�s� / 2 k ± 7 \ ± / \ U e E C E '} .� 0 , \ u ƒ f ƒ E 2 § k § / / t ƒ_ a) CL E j § _ / ) % / •� 0 § ƒ E s U 3 ® / $ \/ � � m 2 a / k § o E _ :3 m . \ c Q \ / \ / / c \ ƒ 0 o u @ c r C E m r 0 E { 2 ' 0 § 0 ' = 2 @ / :3 _ 0 ; 0 ° .2 ° ®° a) 7 @ 2 2 \ m.� { m _ .o _ . _ X M 2 LU 0 k r m/ 2 ƒ $ E§! in 'rn u E 'E 'L 'Ln E { e } e -r- k \ U C: 3 0 d # C: 0 2 / / \ c 0 = 4, .\ 2 \ 0 0 0 y -0 / ( � e > e = § § r e y 2 ) E e\ E_ 2•o -0 < B ± E / •© 7 \ } e E = u 0 �� 0 e 7 0 } � V) w E \ \ U § E 0 § 0 E � � a § e < e . 2 \ / & \ k / CL ƒ 0 ) § E 2 E @ ) } , / § » 2 % § / z o u /' / E 0 £ t E Q e : / / f f E / 2 e E 2 E $ \ o .� 0 , u ƒ ƒ E 2 / / t C: E j § / ) % / •� 0 § ƒ E s U 3 ® / $ .E �E3 2 / k { / •/ E / & 2 > 2 0 - ? \ . \ # W e -, @ ƒ \ ®^ { LU 0 2 @ 2 2 \ _ X M 2 LU § ƒ t .4-J / s 7 • -� R = \ e -r- k \ / C: 3 0 d # C: 0 2 / c 0 = 4, .\ 2 .g E \ 0 0 0 y -0 / \ � e > e = § e y 2 ) E e\ E_ 2•o -0 < B ± E _ •© 7 ƒ § } e E = u 0 �� 0 e 7 0 / � V) E \ \ U § 0 E • y e" e § e < e . 2 \ / r -W � ' k \ / L .� 4 ) ) _ ƒ % / M k E -0 c @ ® ® �t CL @ 2 0 " ® ƒ \ 11 £ 2 ■ - Lon- 2 4 c �� o �� < E 2@ r- / 2 z E Q o u� \ •§ 8 o CL 5; M ® 2 2 I § > \ o � I= $ 2 Appendix w u Q J I-- 0 • V) P- A sit-T-11 Vision, Goals &Objectives Adopted by City Council on November 17, 2009 Ordinance No. 960 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 1 3 , DRAFT North Sector Plan March 29, 2010 Appendix A SOUTHLAKE 2030 VISION STATEMENT Southlake will continue to enhance its status as a desirable, attractive, safe, healthy and fiscally -sound community with quality neighborhoods, while maintaining a high standard of living, learning, shopping, working, recreation, and open spaces. Southlake will continue to be a vibrant community that epitomizes both economic and environmental sustainability. SOUTHLAKE 2030 GOALS & OBJECTIVES Goall. QualitvDevelopment Promote quality development that is consistent with the Urban Design Plan, well - maintained, attractive, pedestrian- friendly, safe, contributes to an overall sense ofplace and meet the needs of vibrant and diverse community. Objective 1.1 Encourage the maintenance of existing neighborhoods, features and amenities in order to preserve property values and a unique sense of place. Objective 1? Create and preserve attractive pedestrian- friendly streets and pathways to encourage transportation alternatives to the automobile. Objective 1.3 Encourage appropriately- scaled neighborhood design that compliments existing development patterns while creating unique places, recognizing that quality residential neighborhoods are the cornerstone of our community. Objective 1.4 Emphasize creativity and ensure environmental stewardship in the design of all development and public infrastructure, maximizing the preservation of desirable natural features such as trees, topography, streams, wildlife corridors and habitat. Objective 1.5 Promote unique community character through a cohesive theme by emphasizing urban design detail and performance standards for structures, streets, street lighting, landscapin& entry features, wayfinding signs, open spaces, amenities, pedestrian/automobile orientation and transition to adjacent uses. Objective 1.6 Consider high - quality single - family residential uses as part of a planned mixed -use development at appropriate transitional locations. Objective 1.7 Explore and encourage opportunities for redevelopment when appropriate. Objective 1.8 Ensure high - quality design and a heightened sensitivity towards the integration of new development with the existing development and urban design pattern. SWTHLAKE203 0 Vision, Goals & Objectives 1 November 17, 2009 Objective 1.9 Strengthen street and landscape design standards to enhance the visual quality along major corridors. Objective 1.10 Continue to promote a strong working relationship with the Texas Department of Transportation to improve the appearance of bridges, embankments and entryways into the City. Objective 1.11 Ensure that city- and developer- provided infrastructure is functional, aesthetically well - designed, and integrated with the natural environment. Objective 1.12 Continue to strengthen the City's regulations to encourage effective signage that is appropriately designed and scaled to minimize adverse impacts on community aesthetics. Objective 1.13 Explore creating participation programs with home owner associations and subdivision groups to enhance the long -term viability of neighborhood features and amenities. Goa12.• Balance Maintain a balanced approach to growth and development in order to preserve the City's assets (schools, public safety, and competitive edge in the region) and fiscal health. Objective 2.1 Encourage a balance of uses, including retail, office, medical, hospitality, entertainment, institutional, industrial and residential that is both responsive to and sustainable within changing market conditions and sustains growth in property values for the future. Objective 2.2 Support appropriate public - private financial partnerships that will help retain and enhance the City's economic base. Objective 2.3 Ensure the City's built environment fosters a positive relationship between the taxable value of real property and the corresponding cost of municipal services. Goal 3. Mobility Develop an innovative mobility system that provides for the safe, convenient, efficient movement of people and goods, reduces traffic congestion, promotes energy and transportation efficiency and promotes expanded opportunities for citizens to meet some routine needs by walking or bicycling. Objective 3.1 Provide a safe and efficient streets and pathways network that allows travel to shopping areas, schools, parks and places of employment, reducing the S( JTHLAKE203 0 Vision, Goals & Objectives 2 November 17, 2009 need to travel on the City's major arterials (FM 1709, FA1 1938, or SH 114) and minimizes cut - through traffic in residential neighborhoods. Objective 3.2 Implement and promote a mobility system that addresses safety, design, comfort and aesthetic elements such as landscaping, crosswalks, railing, lighting, traffic - calming and signage in order to provide distinct character and functionality for the City. Objective 33 In accordance with a need identified by the Citizen Survey, provide and promote a continuous pedestrian pathways system that is user - friendly, efficient, safe, economical, and connect parks, shopping, schools, work and residential areas. Objective 3.4 Pursue opportunities to link Southlake's pathways to systems in adjacent cities and trails on the Corps of Engineers property. Objective 3.5 Develop a program to encourage the dedication of easements for pathway construction in accordance with the sidewalk priority plan and Capital Improvements Plan. Objective 3.6 Identify and prioritize the funding and construction of mobility system capital improvements projects according to the impacts on safety, system efficiency, costs, and maintaining acceptable levels of service. Objective 3.7 Increase safe bicycle mobility when reasonably possible. Objective 3.8 Continue to promote a strong working relationship with the Texas Department of Transportation to identify, design and implement projects that prevent or relieve congestion in the area. Objective 3.9 Continue to evaluate and improve upon the existing mobility system within the City, maintaining existing infrastructure, making required improvements and evaluating innovative ways to integrate transportation and land use. Objective 3.10 Obtain adequate right -of -way for future roadway corridors and improvements. Goal 4.• Parks, Recreation and Open Space Support a comprehensive integrated parks, recreation and open space system for all ages that creates value and preserves natural assets of the City. Objective 4.1 Ensure that new development incorporates usable open space. S( JTHLAKE203 0 Vision, Goals & Objectives 3 November 17, 2009 Objective 4.2 Ensure that parkland and open spaces include an integrated mix of developed and natural areas with consideration of protecting the City's ecosystem and wildlife corridors. Objective 4.3 Promote water conservation and reuse in the design of parks and open spaces. Objective 4.4 Utilize partnerships to create open space and recreation facilities. Objective 4.5 Ensure an even geographic distribution of park facilities and recreation activities both active and passive —for citizens of all ages. Objective 4.6 Provide a full range of park facilities and linear linkages that will accommodate the current and future needs of the City's residents and visitors. Objective 4.7 Integrate passive recreational opportunities into preserved natural and drainage areas. Objective 4.8 Incorporate feedback received from the Parks and Recreation Citizen Survey into recreation activities and park facilities. Objective 4.9 Acknowledge the City's rich natural history, heritage and historical landmarks. Objective 4.10 Determine parkland desirable for dedication as part of the development process based on classification, location and maintenance cost. Objective 4.11 Prioritize investments in existing and established parks understanding that there will be strategic opportunities for land acquisition. Objective 4.12 Incorporate educational and learning opportunities within parks and related facilities. Objective 4.13 Pursue recreational and educational opportunities on Corps of Engineers property compatible with the goal of protecting and preserving the existing ecosystem for future generations. Goal 9- Public Safety Establish and maintain protective measures and policies that reduce danger, risk or injury to property and individuals who live, work or visit the City. Objective 5.1 Maintain a level of police, fire and ambulance services commensurate with population and business needs. SOIJTHLAKE243 0 Vision, Goals & Objectives 4 November 17, 2009 Objective 5.2 Provide effective and efficient professional public safety services in partnership with the citizens we serve, encouraging mutual respect and innovative problem - solving, thereby improving the quality of life in our community. Objective 5.3 Ensure compliance with the stated standard of response coverage and industry guidelines through the provision of facilities, equipment, personnel and roadways. Objective 5.4 Ensure that all buildings and public facilities are constructed in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local safety regulations and standards. Objective 5.5 Maintain the continued compliance with national standard of excellence through the accreditation process. Objective 5.6 Enhance and promote public safety through public- private partnerships and utilization and training of volunteers. Objective 5.7 Maintain a high level of community readiness through training and communications among neighborhood and volunteer groups and city, county, state, and federal entities. Objective 5.8 Develop and implement safety education programs that enhance the quality of life and safety in the community. Objective 5.9 Promote security of public buildings and infrastructure. Objective 5.10 Ensure safe and healthy working conditions for city staff, volunteers and officials by providing security, facility, vehicular and equipment maintenance, information, education and training. Goal 6.• Economic Development Create a diversified, vibrant and sustainable economy through the attraction and support of business enterprises and tourism meeting the vision and standards desired by City leaders. Objective 6.1 Objective 6.2 Objective 6.3 Promote the City both nationally and regionally as a great place to live, work, visit, shop and recreate. Provide necessary, desirable and diverse goods and services for residents of the City. Foster an environment that retains and supports existing businesses to ensure the sustainability of our existing tax base. SOIJTHLAKE243 0 Vision, Goals & Objectives 5 November 17, 2009 Objective 6.4 Attract desired businesses to ensure economic growth as well as continued employment and services for residents of the City. Objective 6.5 Enhance the quality of life for residents and the sustainability of City business through the promotion of the tourism, convention and hotel industry in the City. Objective 6.6 Develop a clear and understandable incentive policy that accomplishes the business attraction and retention goals of the City and is based on factors such as job creation, investment, quality of business, return on investment and overall value to the community. Objective 6.7 Foster communication between the public and private sectors. Goal 7.• Sustaivah&o Encourage the conservation, protection, enhancement and proper management of the natural and built environment. Objective 7.1 Maintain and implement policies to reduce the use of nonrenewable resources, such as energy in the heating, cooling, and operation and maintenance of city facilities. Objective 7? Promote public awareness and education on such sustainability issues as public health, energy and water conservation and overall environmental stewardship. Objective 7.3 Promote sustainable public and private development practices and patterns, building design, water -use reduction and waste reduction while maintaining the existing character of the city. Objective 7.4 Protect surface, storm, and groundwater quality from septic discharge, impervious surface runoff, improper waste disposal and other potential contaminant sources. Objective 7.5 Conserve, restore and promote tree and plant cover that is native or adaptive to the City and region while also protecting existing significant vegetation and maintaining the existing character of the City. Objective 7.6 Protect and enhance air quality in coordination with federal, regional and local agencies. Objective 7.7 Recognize the importance of and protect the biological diversity for the ecological and aesthetic benefits to the community. 50UTHLAKE203 0 Vision, Goals & Objectives 6 November 17, 2009 Objective 7.8 Define, protect, and celebrate the local Cross Timbers Ecosystem as a community asset for future generations. Objective 7.9 Assess and minimize the ecological impact of any new trails provided on Corps of Engineers property. Goal 8.• Community Facilities Plan and provide quality community facilities and services that effectively meet the service needs ofSouthlake's residents and businesses. Objective 8.1 Provide a level of community facilities that meet the needs of both the existing and projected population. Objective 8.2 Encourage cooperation with the school districts in planning for and financing community facilities to encourage the cost- effective provision of resources. Objective 8.3 Systematically e aluate City -owned buildings in terms of their quality of service delivery and prioritize maintenance and renovation accordingly. Objective 8.4 Incorporate new computer and telecommunications technologies into public buildings and designated areas in order to improve time and cost efficiency of service delivery and to meet increasing demands of information access and sharing. Goal 9.• Parmershins Fully utilize and coordinate with the City's many parmers to address issues facing the area, provide services and facilities, promote volunteerism, support events and programs and encourage economic growth. Objective 9.1 Partner with other government entities, non - governmental organizations and the North Central Texas Council of Governments to address regional and local issues. Objective 9.2 Continue mutually beneficial partnerships between the City and local school districts to explore the provision of facilities, services, technology, and other opportunities through open communication and close coordination. Objective 9.3 Continue active partnerships with non - profit organizations, civic groups and local businesses to create opportunities that benefit the community. Objective 9.4 Partner with local school districts to educate Southlake's youth in their municipality and seek youth input when planning the future of our community. S( JTHLAKE203 0 Vision, Goals & Objectives 7 November 17, 2009 Goal10.• Infrastructure Through sound management and strategic investment, develop, maintain, improve and operate public infrastructure that promotes health, safety and an enhanced quality of life for all members of the community. Objective 10.1 Ensure equitably - distributed and adequate services and facilities. Objective 10.2 Plan and program land acquisition and the installation of all essential public facilities to reasonably coincide with the need for such facilities. Objective 10.3 Identify and implement programs where costs may be shared by multiple agencies and /or developers. Objective 10.4 Provide for adequate public water and sewer services in appropriate areas of the City. Objective 10.5 Provide and maintain an effective stormwater management system throughout the City. Objective 10.6 Maintain and enhance existing infrastructure and levels of service through the provision of timely maintenance, repair and replacement as needed. Objective 10.7 Provide and maintain effective solid waste collection and recycling programs for residents. Objective 10.8 Provide a streetlight system for adequate illumination and a wayfinding signage system for pedestrian and driver safety where appropriate. S( JTHLAKE203 0 Vision, Goals & Objectives 8 November 17, 2009 • �1 W CL i WA r 0 4 — 0 L) L Q o ODLL E as � 3 P3 ❑ � N N .V u 7 c `m co N O -1 L Q iL E N N Q d] s as L = Q� = OO s a zs _ _ _T E o � O > U1 m 7 N B C T 0 = T {Tf Y Y � 1 4) ❑ L 7 N o� m L ❑a N 3 Q ❑ LL Y i ❑ E M H ❑ ❑ L) x W ❑ E Q U • O LS a O M 7 O ar N W 7 I� r� W Q U 7 0 W 7 J L U1 Q s � Y y ar Y om' y °� ® E (D . U .� p. p a) 7 L '❑ L RI 'y C) fc t� ❑ B 0 U] M �1 C) C 0 p o— S L CLO L O +' O C: > 4- N •� Q O C C �n �' L O C +� OU f6 ' i L Q O C Q +� O ° ''n C 4. 'a O +' N N + > 7 Q°' ±' • L a+ • N C O a� Q C 'a > M +, O O S L �n �n N N O a° > O to 3 a a� .� S c m E N N S Ln O E N} L 'O N C 'a C U O Q j-0 > Q N N >O s C N (6 tw N; N (U6 f6 — VI u c (6 I � � C O 3 I O a C f6 V) � VI N tw CL Ln E U -0 u `o s +' s +; O o a� ° to L 0 u s E p Q O U Q p U tw S � > C w C � , C N N f6 U > > C +� f6 O O >> +' C L e� ati ° i • f6 O N C O U • � U I N C • C 2 P . N f ;} Ca N .> i to Q (�6 N .0 (C6 CL - a N N N N m W L O +, M x 4 s L /.I • i6 c6 L p W l'L� Q E 4 - (/1 U N N (6 C 0 +, s VI w w C (6 to ,i L W h ®. Ln Q) L U O V1 L m : U 4 p Qa N f6 M t O U ~ N N >- p 4- N S E " m `p o - 3 , z = L c �+ > ' c`a ° a) -- +� U Ln � tin C a� +, ° s ° c o E c U o .�" C: 4; +� N �^" E U, O N ® O N z N tw O z L — -- Z, M C V C U C w> S N O C �n C .l. Q -a N Q i t fV g1 C m m 7 W N U Q U m N 7 O (6 s +, n O O m (6 O L m k a 00 of � C3 z O O � s y c 0 O a ° cu m ° M `o Q CL 3 3 a u `� -a N w E to " 0 o 3 O o aj ° +� � C: o 1.- °' ° 41 ° stw C a� c a a x ° : +° Q tw C: p a +, ,� � C tw vi p U {.1 N O L N S C = L 0 +, to 4 L U N L 4, f6 +� N N > O +� U N N +, 'n N N s N N> N L +' C > E C C 4. C ° 0 +' to +, Q) +' 4- to C *' to E +' L to N x C 'a C O m -a O N U `� LO E E �+ O L f6 O +� - O N C x U m 4 m � ° N S f6 C •E N tw u O N L +, N m O N m C C U U N +' C C E s Q� 7 s C: O s j 4' V) O M M Q) C a) + s V) - p .E p +� Q u U qA +, U N N O E L N 4 L to N o a a 3 N L I� � v s ° a o Q � c > L >� I N o p N N M U L E �' C x +, 7 U 4 L 7 U M O I O 0 E Q) Q V1 to �° N Q E •® O ' 4 - 'a 0 >O , 0 7 N a"1 N ' N L Lw C Q � ° S i — ° '� � (6 �O 0 76 E c c �� +� Q p i�l O O N � N L �I +� f6 >> C 0 CA c O 3 m d� >� C U s to +� ,Pm +1 O w w '� C C .0 > c� C > .� c = c U ' tw E W a-' w - a O 4) c VI L Ln V Q) L �1y S L (6 OU A U O W +� tw C n +� s L Q M VI p�� W N (6 4- NO c-I N M LfI l0 I� Page l of 3 Stephanie Breitbarth From: Ken Baker Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:47 PM ... ........... . To: Stephanie Breitbarth; Clayton Comstock Subject: Fwd: Our call re: North Sector Plan Please hand out. Sent front nay 1Phone Begin forwarded. message: From: "Gregory Swain" Date: April S, 2010 1:34:29 PM CDT To: 'Ken Baker" �k' haler {�i;ci.sc�uth]al<e.(x.tts� Subject: Our call( re: North Sector Plan Dear Mr. Baker: Thank you.for returning my call. Per our conversation, here is a summary of some of my comments from our discussion, particularly those concerning the document "North Sector flan 03- 29- 2010." To preface .these remarks, know that I have been a Southlake resident for over 20 .years. 1 chose Southlake for its small size (4,500 residents at that time), rural character, strict development codes (nninimuni 1 -2 acre lots), proximity to my office at the then -new Solana complex, and proximity to DFw airport for business travel. During my - time here, I have seen explosive, uncontrolled growth in residential housing, little industry (better tax base), and ever - increasing taxes, particularly for a school system that has no concept of fiscal responsibility. Overall, while the City has stated some worthy goals in its strategy and vision, I do not see it living up to thetas. Today's attempts at planning seem to be more like_ closing the proverbial barn door after the horse.has escaped. Regarding the report in question: 1. As stated on page 2 "Accordingly, the preservation of the rural character in the north side of Southlake is of the utmost importance to the citizens." I cannot agree more with this statement. However, it is clear from page 23, item E8, "The Environmental Resource Protection Map has not been updated since its adoption in 2005. It shows areas that have been developed as areas recommended for preservation." that, development not preservation is the City's priority. 4/8/2010 Page 2 of 3 By continuing to approve new development --W especially residential development — in the North Sector, the City Council is more interested in satisfying real estate professionals (developers and salesmen) than those of us who already live here. Frankly, no one with a real estate license should be allowed to serve on either the P &D Commission or the City Council. Despite assertions from the Mayor that I received from him concerning "conflict of interest" clauses, my experience has been that Southlake has a history of being run and managed by people with a vested interest in development, particularly residential development, at the expense of the City's rural character. 2. The Issues and Recommendations cited in items LU7 -10 on pages 14 -15 appear to be nothing more than rubber - stamping development that has already been approved, again despite the citizens' desire for the "preservation of the rural character" cited earlier. Again, development trumped preservation. 3. The infrastructure for new residential developments, such as street widening and other improvements needed to accommodate more traffic, always tags considerably behind the building of houses. No new houses should be built in the planned new developments until the infrastructure, particularly roads, is in place. This infrastructure development should be at the expense of the developers, not the taxpayers. By failing to do this, the City lets the developers profit at the expense and convenience of the existing taxpayers. 4. It is unclear if the City derives any benefit from its participation in "Tree City USA" and what this costs the taxpayers. If one actually reads the Tree City USA requirements, one could conceivably obtain this designation while simultaneously cutting down every tree in town: there is no requirement to plant trees, preserve trees, or the like merely the "care and management" of trees, which development has been "managing" out of existence. The first step in every new development project I've seen in Southlake is to bulldoze most, if not all, of the trees. The required "Tree Care Ordinance" could be found on the City's Web site via its search engine (one has to dig through the site) and, frankly, given the bulldozing of trees, Southlake should probably be labeled a "Tree Killer." I see no evidence that "'free City USA" participation is anything other than a phony advertising campaign. Despite the "increased emphasis" and related accolades cited on page 21, there appear to be far fewer trees in Southlake now than when I moved here, and current development plans will probably mean a further reduction in trees. 5. Zone 1 I on Map 6B should be penrianently set aside as Rural Conservation. The Issue cited under LU 11, noting in the third bullet that there is "Considerable acreage for land developable within next 20 years" probably has developers salivating, but as can be seen from the City's history of development over preservation (re: point 2 above), whether the City will truly preserve anything designated as "Rural Conservation" — per the associated Recommendation - -- is highly suspect. 6. I am very concerned that "wildlife management" will simply mean killing the animals whose habitat has been displaced by Southtake's uncontrolled development and its clear priority (re: point 1) for development over preservation. We frankly like the wildlife. While I 4/8/2010 Page 3 of 3 have yet to see a feral hog, we see fewer and fewer Roadrunners and other native Texas wildlife as unchecked development has proceeded. Thank you for taking the time to consider my comments and to add them to the record of tonight's meeting which, unfortunately, 1 will be unable to attend. Sincerely, Gregory E, Swain 2407 Taylor Street Southlake, TX 76092 817 -929 -4303 4/8/2010 Page 1 From: Ken Baker Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 3:41 PiVI To: Jennifer Crosby; Clayton Comstock Subject: FW: Development on Shady Lane Please place email in the N sector file. Thanks. Ken Baker, AICP Planning and Development Services Director City of Southlake 817 -748 -8067 From: Place 2 Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 2:30 PM To: Suzie Craney Cc: Ken Baker Subject: RE: Development on Shady Lane Thank you for your letter stating your position on the land use for the 6 acre tract backing up to Shady Lane. We will record you position on this land tract. I suggest you attend the SPIN meeting for the 2030 Plan regarding land use for the North Sector of Southlake, It is scheduled for Feb. 25 at 6.pm on the 3rd floor of City Hall. I do not have a copy of the proposal from the developer. lam copying Ken Baker, Director of Planning, as I think he will be able to forward you an electronic copy of the proposal. Carolyn Morris Council Member, Place 2 City of Southlake From: Suzie Crane Sent: Mon 2/8/2010 9;44 AM To: Place 2 Subject: Development on Shady Lane Carolyn: I have been informed by neighbors that development of a 6 acre tract backing up to Shady Lane is being proposed, and that the developers are requesting a zoning change to Transitional (?) 1 or 2; with a mixed -use option. As an owner of a quiet, peaceful lot on Rolling Lane with a rural feel to it; that prospect is quite distressing. Southlake has so few areas left that don't feel like Plano or Highland Park, it would be a shame to ruin those so that someone can build ANOTHER retail /commercial strip. The proposal letter from the developer was an attachment, but I really couldn't read it. Is that posted somewhere on line or can it be attached and sent to nee so that I can review it? And what is the timetable for that proposal? Thanks for your help, Sm* Cang 2504 Rolling Lane Cell 817.235.7138 file: / /L:1ProjectslSouth1ake 2030 PlanlCommentslFW Development on Shady Lane.htm 4/14/2010 January 28, 2010 Mr. Ken Baker�� Pirector of Planning and Development Services City of Southlake 1.400 Main Street Suite 300 Southlake, Texas.76092 Re: Southlake 2030 Plan/Tom Allen Letter 'Dear Ken: I have read Mr. Alien's response letter and can fully appreciate his position. Still, part of his premise is based upon a document that wa5,prepared as ap.10prmational paper. Granted, there were recommendations included in that document, and it was attached to the 2030 planning document perthe Council's request for a: historical artifact T he. informational docprn ent was no. A response to the SPiN meeting as sorrie:may hav thou ght To my knowledge, the document certainly was never approved;as any part of city.policy, regulations, or planning. If that fact is accurate, there is no reason to - provjde,a pointjcounterpoirtt response. It is moot, and furthendebate would .serve.no. purpose unless it is being proposed that the original document be officially adopted. I do not think that was ever.:the City's intent nor was that the intent of the document. The only addressed statement was .extracted from the.respanse.submitted after-the 1st "Reading for Draft,Vfslon, _Pools &Objectives "Pr-."Pr-. That statement was included in Objective 7 S.which states, "Define, protect,":ppd celebrate ,the local Crross Timbers Ecosystem as a community asset for.-future.generations generations.'.. way_the . statement is written, it conveys a vision that the City.will work to define exactty what the .local ecosystem entails, the city will determine how wants to protect what it has def ned, and finally, -it will devise means to celebrate the.Cross Timbers Ecosystem.. A vision statement speaks to a broad based generality that the City would want considered in its future planning. To abandon a general broad -based .consideration that the City might want to consider in future deliberations is equivalent to inadvertently supposing that the concept of a.deyelopment alternative in the conservation overlay would be used. 1n the developers simply bypassed any consideration of the over lay and the result was that the.City lost its leverage to protect or control Southlake's growth. Abandoning Objective 7.8.would result in the same type of loss of leverage. cannot accept the argument that it is "quite another to suffer potential condemnation from someone seeking to protect a special interest on a nearby government property". Such an argument is based upon a reciprocal special interest using a hypothetical as a counter argument..This same argument could be used to challenge the City's existing policy on buffer zones along waterways or, for that matter, not allowing a super store to be built, or protecting an existing housing addition from new structures being built that will seriously encroach on privacy. Are these not all issues that the City must evaluate and solve? The issue.is the word "protect ". The wording allows the City to equitably and fairly decided the degree of.protection it wants to sanction in any proposal. That is the purpose and stewardship responsibility of the City Council. I do think it is good to have citizen input such Mr. Allen's, and I appreciate his efforts. Through such input, the City gets a broader perspective on issues. Still, I caution the Council against supporting long term planning that limits its ability to consider all views or to positively affect City growth. Sincerely, Ray L. Chancellor From: contact @cityofsouthlake.com [mailto .contact @cityofsouthiake.com] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:27 AM To: Morrie Fletcher; Stephanie Breitbarth; Ken Baker Subject: Website Contact Form Request ..................................................................................................................................... ............................... This is an automated email generated from the Contact Us page on CityOfSouthlake.com. PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE! REPLY TO SENDER'S EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW! From- Name: Paul W. Johnson Errna4 Address: Comment/Questioni hello I live at 610 Katelyn lane in southlake. I was reviewing your pathways plan, and you still have a pathway going through my property. I have mentioned sevearal time that I do not want a pathway going through my property. I have also disussed this with my neighboring homelproperty owners whom are also against the pathway going through their property. Please find an alternate route for your pathway. Thank you Page 1 of 2 Stephanie Breitbarth From: Lori Payne Rec 2010 Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:09 PM ...... g To: Mayor -Int Cc: Ken Baker; Stephanie Breitbarth Subject: FW: Comments regarding proposal by Sage Group for Land Use Plan Revision for the Mertz, Fusella, and LeTournot tracts near Shady Lane and Roiling Lane From: Gibson, Michele Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:41 PM To: Mayor; Place 1; Place 3 Subject: Comments regarding proposal by Sage Group for Land Use Plan Revision for the Mertz, Fusella, and LeTournot tracts near Shady Lane and Rolling Lane Mayor John Terrell Carolyn Morris Brandon Bledsoe Please do not grant the request to designate the area mentioned above with a "Transition I or 2" overlay and an underlying land use of "Mixed Use ". We do not wish to .Have the possibility of this type of development in the middle of our residential area. Jed and Michele Gibson 2420 Raintree Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 Treasury Circular 230 Disclosure: To the extent this conununication cosh -ai.ns any statemenr regard'nj federal e.axe s , that statement was not 41'it'tetl or intended to be used, and it cannot be used, by any person li) as a basis for avciding fedp:-al tax penalties th,ic may be imposed on that person, or (ii) to promote, market er recommend to another parry any transaction or m:itt.er addressed herein. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Thv information ir: this einail :nay be cciifidel:tial and /o3� privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended reci pient or an 2/212 Page 1 of 1 Stephanie Breitbarth Prom: Lori Payne Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 2:14 PM To: Mayor -Int Cc: Ken Baker; Stephanie Breitbarth Subject: FW: Request for Land Use Plan Revision . . .. .......... ............................... ..... ............................... _ From: Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 1:47 PM To: Mayor Cc: Place 2; Place 3 Subject: Request for Land Use Plan Revision Dear Mayor Terrell, i am writing to express my opposition to the Request for Land Use Plan Revision submitted to the Southlake 2030 Committee by Mr Curtis Young on behalf of the SAGE GROUP, INC. No one will benefit from such a revision except the developer. Since moving to Southlake in 1995 1 have seen undeveloped tracts hosting native species of plants and animals replaced with tons of concrete. The resulting noise, pollution and loss of habitat is a pity. The proposed request for "mixed use" zoning promises more of the same, Please use the influence of your office to prevent the requested revision to this neighborhood's Land Use Plan. Best regards, Sara Alexander 519 Shady Lane Cc: Carolyn Morris Brandon Bledsoe 1/28/2010 Jennifer Crosb From: Ken Baker Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 2:29 PM To: Jennifer Crosby; Clayton Comstock; Bob Price; Gordon Mayer Subject: FW: Information for Council regarding 2030 plan and bicycles ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... Please include in 2030 reference materials. Ken Baker, AICP Planning and Development Services Director City of Southlake 817 -748 -8067 From: Lori Payne Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 2:27 PM To: Mayor and City Council Cc: Ken Baker; Shana Yelverton Subject: FW: Information for Council regarding 2030 plan and bicycles From: Emily Galpin Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 J 1;52 AM To: Lori Payne Subject: Information for Council regarding 2030 plan and bicycles Hello, Lori, I spoke to Carolyn Morris.about the Bicycle Friendly City designation. She suggested 1 send the link to you to provide to council members. Not sure how you handle the dissemination so hope the link is sufficient. httg://www. ke lea ue o[g/p rog ram s/bic clefriendl americalcomrnunitiesf ettin started. php Thanks, Emily Galpin 817.939.1110 Page 1. From: Ken Baker Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 2:19 PM To: Jennifer Crosby Subject: FW: Forward Please re: Future Thinking - Ray Chancellor Attachments: Future Planning -Corps Property -Light Pollution.docx Please include in the correspondance#ile. Thank you_ .... ......... ...... From: Lori Payne Sent: Tue 12/22/2009 11:48 AM Subject: FW: Forward Please re: Future Thinking - Ray Chancellor From: RayChancellor @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 11:45 AM To: Lori Payne Subject: Forward Please re: Future Thinking City Council Members City Manager Yelverton Planning And Dev. Services Dir. Baker First let me express my appreciation for your consideration and inclusion of ecosystem factors in the 2030 Plan. Changes do not come rapidly. But when an idea becomes part of the planning process, great things eventually evolve. You have not compromised the growth of Southlake, but you have noted the importance of our natural history. Thank you. would like to propose another effort for your consideration. The City is slowly leasing or wants to lease all the Corps of Engineers land along the city's northern boundary. That effort is to be applauded. But the next question that should be asked is, "What do we do with it when we get it ?" As with all management activities, they start slowly, rise rapidly, and then level off or decline. The place to make the long term sustaining gains is not at the leveling off or declining stage. It is when you. are doing your best and are on the sharp incline. How does this affect the leased Corps property? While gains are being made with the 2030 Plan, the possible expansion of Bob Jones Nature Center, and the leasing of Corps property, it will be important to get ahead of the process. In leasing the Corps of Engineers land, part of the negotiations should involve renaming the area as an file: / /L:1Projects\Southlake 2030 Plan\Comments\FW Forward Please re Future Thinking - Ray Chan... 4/14/2010 Page 2 ecosystem reserve. (I will discuss names later.) What will be important is to create leverage that can be used later in seeking grants from a number of sources including government funding. This establishes a framework that will provide evidence that the City has this project on the drawing boards and is not just creating a paper tiger to secure funds. It creates the competitive edge. Much work has already been ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ............................... done to document the ecosystem and what it contains. A little effort will benefit the City in nearly all grants supporting such areas. If you want a close example, just look north to Denton where they have created the Clear Creek Natural History Preserve. They are just now building a grant base and have asked the local universities to research the ecology of the preserve. Southlake has already accomplished what Denton has just discovered as a requirement for potential funding proposals. This is just an idea to be studied. It makes little sense to claim an area as large as the Corps of Engineers property and not set the stage to gain from future actions and benefits. The name of such an area needs to blatantly advertise Southlake. Any expansion of the name "Bob Jones" will have no meaning out of the immediate area. This is similar to the Clear Creek name that Denton has chosen. It says nothing about Denton. Names such as the following might serve as preliminary proposals to market Southlake: Southlake Natural History Reserve (You might not want to use "preserve" as it is already in use.) Southlake Cove Wildlife Area (This has been used to denote the epicenter of the greater ecosystem.) Southlake Natural History and Bird Sanctuary (This could be an eco- tourism bullet for Southlake's brochures and may open more doors for grants.) All of these would give a special emphasis to the City — important in a competitive market. It would begin establishing potential for external funding. l hope you will keep this in mind as you look to the year 2030. file://L:1ProjectslSouthlake 2030 PlanlCornmentslFW Forward Please re Future Thinking - Ray Chan... 4/14/2010 Page 3 One last item -- -light pollution. While many may discount any discussion of light pollution, it may be one of those creeping giants. You never know if has arrived until it steps on you. i write a number of educational articles for the Bob Jones Nature Center. I am preparing one on light pollution for an upcoming issue of their newsletter. it is for educational purposes and is being offered to acquaint people with this problem. This draft is not for release at this time. Because you may get questions in the future related to this information, l am sharing the draft with you as "heads up" information. See attached. Thank you for the work you do on behalf of all of us. I wish you a very Merry Christmas and a Joyous New Year! Ray Chancellor Southlake, Texas $17- 421.6353 file:HL:1ProjectslSouth1ake 2030 P1anlCommentslFW Forward Please re Future Thinking -Ray Chan... 4/14/2010 a 0 �-? 11Lt_- Mrc SIIITI LMEGTi_Ae: E, l�%: ...... ................... ......... ...... ........................... ........ ..... ........ ... ... ...... ..... .... ............ ..................... ........ ...... ....... :S.G2 E? ............. ............... ... December 9, 2009 Mr. Ken Balser, AICP Director of Plarming and Development Services City of Southlake 1400 Main Street Suite 300 Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Southlake 2030 Plan Dear lien: I have read your November 11 memorandum to the City Council regarding the Southlake 2030 vision statement, together with its attachments, and am writing to get on the record regarding Dr. Chancellor's conunents and paper and on what appears to be the inclusion of some of those comments in the draft vision statement. The draft vision statement is well written . and it is obvious that a lot of time and effort has been expended. That doesn't surprise me at all, and I commend you and the many others who are involved. Dr. Chdncellor has obviously spent considerable tine on his paper as well, and it is also well written. However, I an very concerned that including points /requests made by his paper in the vision statement will have a very negative effect on private property, and specifically on our remaining Southlake land, as explained below. Dr, Chancellor's comments are centered on a series of adjoining areas which do not include any of our Solana property and which seem to be generally confined to Corps of Engineers (and possibly City) property. However, it seems clear to me that without language restricting the effects of these comments to the public property covered by the paper, land owned by ourselves and others stands to be significantly impacted. We own approximately 228 acres of undeveloped land in Southlake. As you probably know, our property is all located north of Dove Road and south of the Corps of Engineers property (i.e. within the area identified by Dr. Chancellor's comments as the "last remaining portion" of the "Southlake Cove Ecosystem "). The northern portion of our property is adjacent to the southern boundary of the area identified as "F -1" in Mr. Chancellor's report. I would estimate that about 75% of our property has some level of tree cover, and /or "topography" and /or is crossed by creeks, including by Kirkwood Creels. Since any land with these characteristics could potentially also house wildlife, our land could probably be said to fall in the category of a wildlife area as well. Accordingly, we have great concern about the effect that including some of Dr. Chancellor's requested statements in the vision statement could have on our private property. We believe that such g eneral statements as "define, protect and celebrate the local Cro.ss.Tirnbers Ecosystem ", without restricting the application to property owned by the Corps of Engineers and the City, will open the door for allciiipts by special interest groups to keep some or all of our property in an undeveloped state. Already, Dr. Chancellor's paper contains a statement on page 36 that buffer zones for wildlife corridors should be provided on private property. We have been highly cognizant of nature in our development to date and are very proud of the results. For example, our number one planning goal in the development of Kirkwood Hollow was to save every tree possible, and we did so. It is one thing, however, to engage in thoughtful, sensitive planning and quite another to suffer potential condenuiation from someone seeking to protect a special interest on a nearby government property. We should not suffer that fate by virtue of having the done the best job of protecting our property thus far. Thank you again for all of your work on this, and for the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, < �om A len Partner cc: Richard Kuhlman Mike Silliman MASTER U,RSAN DESIGN .. ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUR SAGE GROUP, INC: November 12, 2009 T 01 -00 Mr. Clayton Comstock City of Southlake Planning and Development Services Southlake, Texas RE: Request for Land Use Plan Revision consideration to the Southlake 2030 Committee Clayton: As discussed, we have been working with the property owners and a potential development group regarding the three tracts of land shown on the attached graphic. (The Mertz, Fusella and LeTournot tracts). While all three properties (totaling almost 20 acres) are "undeveloped," two of the three tracts presently have older residences on them ( Fusella and LeTournot). We have studied the development potential of this property and have come to the conclusion that the biggest.obstacle to its development (for any use other than the present one) is a lack of access directly from a public street. The existing residences get to their homes by way of along access easement, through another residential lot fronting onto Shady Lane. We believe, unfortunately, that it is not.practical to expect that easement would be able to be improved into the kind of a street required for further development of any kind. There is no other current access to these tracts. While we understand that the current approval and development regulation practices of the city would not allow for this situation to occur, for whatever reasons development and/or zoning approvals over the years have proceeded without any requirement to extend street access to this area. (We do not know the complete development history of this area, and are not suggesting blame, only identifying the current situation). Of the surrounding properties, almost all are fully developed; complicating and minimizing the possibilities for gaining access. To the west is the Country Acres subdivision, 5 residential lots fronting on Shady Lane; the subject property.has no access to Shady Lane, other than via the aforementioned access easement through one of these lots. To the north is the S. Freeman subdivision; there is no access to or from Rolling Lane. To the east is the Austin Oaks.subdivision, in Grapevine; again, no access. To the south are two commercial properties- the Morrison Office Park (fully developed with pads and parking lots for future office buildings, with no through access) and the Bonola property (partially developed as a dental office, partially undeveloped). It is via the undeveloped portion of the Bonola property that we believe we have the best and perhaps only hope for gaining access (from the SH -114 frontage road, through and in conjunction with development on the Bonola tract). 1330 14. CARROLL AVENUE -SUITE 200 SOUTHLAKE, 'TEXAS 76092 TEL 817.424.2626 FAX 817.424.2890 If an agreement for access from SH -114, through the Bonola property can be worked out and coordinated with the development of that Commercial property, it follows that the uses on the subject tract would need to at least be pampa( aNe with. the nature of that. access. and. the uses through which it passes. This is not to say the same as the "freeway frontage office /commercial" potential of the Bonola property itself, but something more compatible than the Low Density Residential it is currently designated. Of course, adequate consideration of and buffering to the adjacent residential areas to the West, North and East would be also required, as this would then be a transitional /and use area between the Commercial areas along the freeway, and the residential areas further in. Therefore, our request is that the Committee consider designating this area with a "Transition 1 or 2" overlay, and perhaps an underlying land use of "Mixed Use," to allow for the possibility of the preparation and approval of a well thought out, creative land use plan for this area; and at the same time, one which provides for a solution to the current access problem. We would expect, of course, that there will be questions and discussion necessary to get everyone comfortable with this, as well as outreach to the neighbors, and are committed to that. Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions. Best Regards, SAGE GROUP, INC. eu 41 E qb�5, Curtis W. Young, AIA Principal CWY/d b Page 2 of 2 rr) z op We 0 7a7) V GL 4-J (A x W Fv 4-J - 0 a�