Item 6E
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
May 26, 2010
CASE NO: ZA09-069
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan for DPS North Training Facility
REQUEST:
On behalf of the City of Southlake, RPGA Design Group, Inc. is requesting approval of
a zoning change and site plan for the Department of Public Safety North Training
Facility, located at the northeast corner of E. Dove Rd. and N. White Chapel Blvd. The
requested zoning change is from “SF-1A” Single-Family Residential District to “S-P-1”
Detailed Site Plan District with “CS” Community Service District uses to include an
indoor firing range as an accessory use. The proposed facility will include a one-story
building to house training classrooms and a fire station, an indoor firing range, a four-
story training tower and a driving course.
After meeting with adjacent property owners to address their concerns, the following
changes have been made to the plans since approval at the January 7, 2010 Planning
and Zoning Commission meeting.
1. Architectual elements, including a pitched roof parapet and details to simulate
the appearance of windows, have been added to the training tower to address
concerns of adjacent property owners about the aesthetics of the tower. The
height of the tower has been increased to fifty-eight feet (58’) from forty-eight
feet (48’) since P&Z approval, and the maximum height regulation in the “S-P-
1” letter has been revised. Artist’s renderings and revised elevations of the
tower are included in the PowerPoint presentation.
2. A three-foot masonry wall has been added along Dove Rd. to screen the
parking lot.
st
The following changes have been made to the site plan and landscape plan since 1
reading approval at the May 18, 2010 City Council meeting:
Item Comments
1. Remove the six parking spaces that 1. The six parking spaces have been removed
encroach into the bufferyard along E. Dove from the bufferyard on the site plan and
Rd. landscape plan. Two spaces were added by
reconfiguring the parking just east and south
of the training center, resulting in a net loss of
four spaces.
2. Relocate the sidewalk to preserve one tree 2. The sidewalk has been relocated to preserve
at the northwest corner of the property and the three trees.
two trees along Dove Rd.
3. Provide a three-foot berm along Dove Rd. 3. A berm is shown on the site plan in place of
instead of the three-foot masonry wall. the masonry wall.
Case No.
ZA09-069
Variances Requested:
Driveway Ord. No. 634, Section 5.2(d) Driveway Stacking
The applicant is requesting a variance from the requirement for a minimum driveway
stacking depth of one-hundred feet (100’) for the western access drive. A stacking
depth of approximately twenty-four feet (24’) is proposed.
Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Section 5.0 Design Criteria
The applicant has requested 62 feet for the driveway throat width entering from E.
Dove Road where the maximum width permitted is 40 feet.
Currently there is approximately 31% of the surrounding land area within 200 feet in
opposition to this zoning request. This will require a super majority vote of the City
Council (6 of 7 City Council members in favor) in order to approve this request for
zoning change.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider 2nd reading approval of a zoning change and site plan
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information Link to Presentation
(D) SPIN meeting report dated November 9, 2009
(E) Review Summary No. 4, dated May 25, 2010
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(G) Ordinance No. 480-591
for Commission and Council Members Only
(H) Full Size Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT:
Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No.
ZA09-069
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER:
The City of Southlake
APPLICANT:
RPGA Design Group, Inc.
PROPERTY SITUATION:
The northeast corner of E. Dove Rd. and N. White Chapel Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Tract 1F2 and a portion of Tract 1F, Joel W. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 350
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Public/Semi-Public and Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING:
“SF-1A” Single Family Residential District
REQUESTED ZONING:
“S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
HISTORY:
There isno development history on this property.
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW:
A SPIN meeting was held November 9, 2009 (see attached report).
STRATEGIC LINK:
Strategy Map Focus Area - Safety and Security
SOUTHLAKE 2025 PLAN:
Consolidated Land Use Plan
The land use designations for the property are Public/Semi-Public and Low
Density Residential. The proposed development is consistent with these
designations.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
An eight-foot (8’) multi-use trail is planned along the north side of E. Dove Rd.
and the eight-foot trail is shown on the site plan. An eight-foot (8’) multi-use
trail is programmed along the west side of N. White Chapel Blvd. The five-foot
(5’) sidewalk that is required with site plan approval is shown on the east side
of N. White Chapel Blvd. On-street bikeways are planned for N. White Chapel
Blvd. and E. Dove Rd.
Environmental Resource Protection Plan
The Environmental Resource Protection Map shows an area of trees to be
Case No. Attachment A
ZA09-069 Page 1
preserved where appropriate at the northwest corner of the property adjacent
to White Chapel Blvd. The Tree Mitigation Plan shows that the trees in this
area are to be preserved with the exception of some diseased and/or dying
trees that are shown as marginal and may be removed.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends N. White Chapel Blvd. to have 70
feet of right-of-way and E. Dove Rd. to have 88’ of right-of-way. Adequate right-
of-way for these roads is shown on the preliminary plat that is associated with
this case (ZA09-070).
Traffic Impact Analysis
The executive summary from the Traffic Impact Analysis dated November 30,
2009 is attached below in the Plans and Support Information (Attachment C).
Also, please see the Public Works review comments in the attached Site Plan
Review Summary.
WATER & SEWER:
A 12” diameter water line exists in theN. White Chapel Blvd. right-of-way to
serve the property. The sanitary sewer line for the project will connect to an
existing 18”/14” force main in the E. Dove Rd. right-of-way.
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS:
Drainage from this site is generally to the east to the proposed detention pond
within the development, which will outfall to the existing creek east of
Ridgecrest Drive.
TREE PRESERVATION:
Existing trees that are shown to be preserved must be preserved or mitigated if
altered. Please see the additional comments in the Tree Conservation Review
section of the attached Site Data Review Summary.
PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION:
January 7, 2010; Approved (6-0), granting the requested variance to driveway
stacking, and subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated December
30, 2009.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
January 19, 2010; Approved (6-0) on Consent to Table to the February 2, 2010
Regular City Council Meeting.
February 2, 2010; Approved (6-0) on Consent to Table to the March 2, 2010
Regular City Council Meeting.
March 2, 2010; Approved (6-0) on Consent to Table to the April 20, 2010
Regular City Council Meeting.
April 20, 2010; Approved (6-0) on Consent to Table to the May 18, 2010
Regular City Council Meeting.
st
May 18, 2010; Approved 1 reading (6-1), noting changes requested of
staff, including looking into tree preservation, reviewing the hooded wall,
and moving the six parking places in front of the training center and
including Review Summary No. 3, dated May 12, 2010 and granting the
variances as requested.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA09-069 Page 2
STAFF COMMENTS:
Site Plan Review SummaryNo.4, dated May 25, 2010, is attached.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA09-069 Page 3
Case No. Attachment B
ZA09-069 Page 1
“S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District Regulations and Variance Request
This site shall comply with all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
No. 480, as amended, as it pertains to the “CS” Community Service District uses and regulations
with the following exceptions:
Permitted Uses
All permitted uses in the “CS” Community Service District shall be permitted. In addition, an indoor
firing range shall be permitted as an accessory use.
Development Regulations
1. The height of the training structure shall not exceed four stories or fifty-eight feet (58’).
2. The minimum building setback allowed will be the same as allowed by “CS” zoning with the
exception that the setback for the training structure adjacent to residential property shall be
forty feet (40’).
3. No bufferyard will be required along the eastern property line.
The following variance is also requested:
Variance to Driveway Ord. No. 634, Section 5.2(d), requiring a minimum driveway stacking depth of
one-hundred feet (100’) for the western access drive. We are requesting a stacking depth of
twenty-four feet (24’).
Case No. Attachment C
ZA09-069 Page 1
TIA Executive Summary Dated November 30, 2009
Case No. Attachment C
ZA09-069 Page 2
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO.
Formal Application Pending
PROJECT NAME:
North DPS Training Facility & North Park Multi-Purpose Field Complex
SPIN DISTRICT:
SPIN # 2
MEETING DATE:
November 9, 2009
MEETING LOCATION:
1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MEETING ROOMS 3A & 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE:
Forty (40)
City Staff: Jim Blagg, Asst. City Manager-Operations; Robert Finn,
APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING:
Chief of Police; Chris Tribble, Director of Community Services; and Project Architect, Robert Garza;
Park Design Consultant, Spencer Freeman
OTHER STAFF PRESENT:
Peter Kao, Construction Manager; Gordon Mayer, Deputy Director of
Public Works; Ken Baker, Director of Planning & Development Services; Bob Price, Director of
Public Works; Cheryl Taylor, Civil Engineer; Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I
STAFF CONTACT:
Lorrie Fletcher, (817)748-8069; lfletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Property Situation
The property is located at the northeast corner of Dove and White Chapel.
Development Details
The City of Southlake is proposing to construct a police and fire training facility as well as a multi-
purpose field complex on approximately 32 acres. The proposed North Park will include four (4) multi-
purpose fields intended for Southlake Touch Football and Carroll La Crosse.
DISCUSSION
Explain the firing range; will there be a privacy fence? What are the expected noise levels?
We are proposing an eight (8) foot privacy fence around the property. The firing range is
o
mostly underground and completely enclosed; there is little noise from the firing range
anticipated.
Will there be controlled fires for training?
Yes, however, no real burn - propane.
o
Where do you train today and how do you justify the cost of this facility?
Our police and fire fighters currently train at DFW. The scheduling is challenging and costly
o
in overtime pay. Our response time will significantly improve with a local facility. Also, other
agencies will use this facility which will cover operating cost.
Will the firing range have a filtration system?
Yes, an action target system is planned.
o
Traffic is already heavy. What are you going to do about increased traffic?
We anticipate the facility will be used during off-peak hours. We will be conducting a traffic
o
impact analysis before this goes to P&Z. By the time the new facility is constructed, the
roundabout will be completed, which should help.
When do you anticipate completion of construction and is the cost already budgeted?
Case No. Attachment D
ZA09-069 Page 1
Construction is anticipated to begin late 2010/early 2011 and completed by 2012. The
o
funds have been budgeted… City Council has approved the Crimes Control Plan. Also, this
proposal will have to go through the process of Planning and Zoning as well as City
Council, for approval. A full cost analysis has not been done yet.
Comments/Concerns
Noisy sport’s fields not appropriate for this area
CISD doesn’t have lights but this will…
Our homes were here first
Sufficient parking
Access from north side off cul-de-sac
Functional fence vs. decorative
Weapon’s specifications for shooting range
Ground animal displacement
Park connectivity
Drainage
Lights
Power lines
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather
it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as
summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and
Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA09-069 Page 2
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA09-069Two5/12/10
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Site Plan– DPS North Training Facility
Project Name:
APPLICANT: RPGA Design Group, Inc. OWNER: City of Southlake
Robert Garza Jim C. Blagg
101 S. Jennings Ave. #100 1400 Main St. Ste 460
Fort Worth, TX 76104 Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 332-9477 ext. 208 Phone: (817) 748-8601
Fax: (817) 332-9487 Fax: (817) 748-8010
E-mail: robgarza@rpgaarchitects.com E-mail: jblagg@ci.southlake.tx.us
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/26/10
AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE
CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF
YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD
SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602 OR DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072.
1. Please change the zoning application from “CS” Community Service to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan
District with “CS” as the base zoning.
2. Please provide a separate, color-coded Tree Conservation Plan that reflects the changes to the
site plan and the landscape plan.
3. The location of utilities shown on the Utility Plan appear to conflict with trees shown to be
preserved on the Tree Conservation Plan. Please ensure that the Tree preservation Plan is
compatible with the civil plans submitted by Cheatham & Associates.
4. Please correct the gross acreage, impervious coverage and open space on the landscape plan
and/or the site plan so that they match. The gross acreage per the preliminary plat is 10.635 acres
as is shown on the site plan.
5. Please remove all easements from the site plan and provide them only on the utility plan.
Joel
6. Correct the Addition name in the title to W. Chivers.
7. Show the Air Processing Unit on the RPGA site plan as it is shown on the utility plan and relocate
it out of the bufferyard along the northern property line. If noise will be an issue, relocate the unit
away from property with a land use designation of Low Density Residential.
8. Dimension the distance from the northeast corner of the firing range to the northern property line at
40’ or greater or add a regulation to the “S-P-1” letter to modify the building line.
9. Please show and label the required 10’ x 50’ loading space on the plan and add one required and
one provided loading space to the Site Data Summary Chart. If no loading space is to be provided,
please add a regulation to the “S-P-1” letter.
10. Please ensure that all mechanical equipment, both roof-mounted and ground-mounted, is
screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Roof-mounted equipment must be screened by parapets or by
integral parts of the roof. Ground-mounted equipment must be screened by walls or shrubs.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA09-069 Page 1
11. All driveways/points of ingess/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as
Please label the stacking depth measured from the R.O.W. to the nearest parking
amended.
stall or intersecting drive lane pavement edge.
The western access drive does not meet the
required minimum stacking depth of 100’. Approximately 24’ is provided, measured from the
northern tip of the landscaped parking area adjacent to the six southernmost parking spaces to the
R.O.W line. The functional stacking depth (measured to the traveled roadway surface) is
approximately 64’.
12. If applicable, show the location of any on-site facilities for liquid and solid waste temporary storage
pending disposal.
13. Please describe and provide an example of the permeable pavers shown on the site plan.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
(817) 748-8229
kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
TREE CONSERVATION:
1. Some of the existing trees as shown on the submitted Tree Conservation Plan have been removed
since they were surveyed. Please identify which trees have been removed and remove them from the
plan.
2. Please designate the Chinaberry trees on the east side of the east open space area to be removed.
4. There are four (4) water lines and one (1) sanitary sewer line proposed to be located through the open
space area between the main building and the driving course. Please remove these utilities from the
open area because they conflict with the critical root zone area of the existing trees in the area and
their preservation.
5. There is a sanitary sewer line and water line proposed to be located directly through two (2) large
Pecan trees located east of the west access drive. Please relocate the location of these utility lines so
as not to conflict with the trees.
6. Please ensure that all proposed utilities do not conflict with the proposed preservation of any existing
trees. Existing trees that are shown to be preserved must be preserved or mitigated if altered. Please
make the project Engineer aware of this and both him and the Landscape Architect work together to
preserve the existing trees as shown on the plan.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved
Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved
by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities,
structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing
trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
Case No. Attachment E
ZA09-069 Page 2
1. Please identify what plant material will be within the bio-swales located within the east parking lot
area.
2. All of the parking lot landscape islands are required to contain the minimum of one (1) canopy tree,
shrubs, ornamental grasses, ground cover, seasonal color or a combination of these plant materials.
Sod or turf grass is not permitted.
3. Please design the proposed landscaping so that trees proposed to be planted are not within the
canopy area of existing trees, not adjacent to light poles, under power lines, over utilities, not within
site triangles, or within 10’ of a fire hydrant.
BUFFERYARDS:
1. Please move the Air Processing Unit out of the north bufferyard and provide the proper screening
material for it.
PARKING:
1. Please identify what the permeable paving will consist of. Is it permeable/pervious concrete, pavers,
grasscrete, slotted pavers?
2. All parking lot landscape islands are required to be a minimum of twelve feet (12’) in width from back-
of-curb to back-of-curb.
PEDESTRIAN TRAIL:
The trail is also not consistent throughout the plans. Please make sure that the same trail design is on
each plan.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Cheryl Taylor, P.E.
Civil Engineer
(817) 748-8100
ctaylor@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. The Traffic Impact Analysis indicates that a right turn lane is not warranted because the site does not
meet the 60 vph criteria. However, Ordinance 634 (Driveway Ordinance) states that a development
which generates 50 vph requires a right turn lane. Revise analysis and site plan accordingly.
2. The TIA should also address the need for a left turn lane along Dove Road to handle the traffic
entering the proposed development.
3. Per storm water regulations (the municipal storm water permit and the ordinance prohibiting illicit
discharges to the municipal storm water sewer system), allowable discharges or flows from fire
fighting activities do not include washing of trucks, runoff water from training activities, test water from
fire suppression systems, and similar activities. Provide documentation on how these discharges will
be diverted from entering the municipal storm water sewer system.
* City construction standard details, including embedment, will be used for the construction of all water,
sewer and storm drain and paving proposed with this development.
* Sight distances will be required to conform to AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
* Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’
Case No. Attachment E
ZA09-069 Page 3
minimum.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible.
WATER AND SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
* What is the reasoning behind a 12” water line thru the site?
* The alignment of the 12” water line along Dove Road shall not require additional ROW or easements
from the properties to the south.
* Water meters and fire hydrants must be located in an easement or right-of-way.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. The difference between pre and post development runoff shall be captured in the detention pond. The
proposed detention pond shall control the discharge of the 2, 10 and 100 year storm events.
* Verify that the size, shape, and/or location of the detention pond, as depicted on the
site/concept/development plan, will be adequate to meet the detention requirements. Any changes to
the size, shape, and/or location of the proposed pond(s) may require a revision to the
concept/site/development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission
and the City Council.
* Drainage from this site is generally to the east to the proposed detention pond within the development
which will outfall to the existing creek east of Ridgecrest Drive.
* All storm sewers collecting runoff from the public street shall be 18-inch RCP, minimum.
* There is no Critical Drainage Structure fee associated with this development.
* The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit civil construction plans (22” X 34” full size sheets) and a completed Construction Plan
Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. The plans shall
conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes
which are located on the City’s website.
* A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082
to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer’s Agreement will be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836.
* This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of
construction plans.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Informational Comments:
* Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480, Section 43.13.a.1.is
required on the proposed buildings.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA09-069 Page 4
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right-of-ways and residential properties in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of
lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
65
* It appears that this property lies within the LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning
Ordinance No. 479.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay
Zones.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,
and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment E
ZA09-069 Page 5
Surrounding Property Owners
DPS North Training Facility
SPO # Owner Name Zoning Land Use Acreage Response
1 Gonser, Lois I SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.30 NR
2 Campbell, Bradley W Etux Cindy SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.26 O
3 Southlake, City Of SF1-A Low Density Residential 0.65 NR
4 Rawls, Bobby Etux Lisa SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.24 O
5 Rodgers, Stacy Etvir Gregory SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.23 O
6 Porter, James Etux Krystal SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.02 O
7 Myles, Robert Etux Karamella SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.08 O
8 4F Development / Ep 4 Lp RPUD Low Density Residential 0.68 NR
9 4F Development / Ep 4 Lp RPUD Low Density Residential 0.45 NR
10 Estes Park Hoa Inc RPUD Low Density Residential 0.18 O
11 Casazza, Eric J Etux Jennie L RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.39 O
12 Gomez, Raymond Jr Etux Sharon RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.39 NR
13 Friedman, Benjamin Etux Gina RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.39 NR
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 1
SPO # Owner Name Zoning Land Use Acreage Response
14 Holden, Scott C Etux Paula C RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.39 NR
15 Darnule, Amit T Etux Neeta RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.40 O
16 Bay, Theresa A RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.45 NR
17 Southlake, City Of RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.67 NR
18 Tate, J R Etux Kathryn AG Low Density Residential 4.50 NR
19 Jmsat Real Estate Ltd AG Low Density Residential 4.30 O
Low Density Residential,
20 Southlake, City Of SF1-A Public/Semi-Public 28.91 NR
21 Southlake, City Of SF1-A Public/Semi-Public 2.10 NR
22 Southlake, City Of RPUD Mixed Use 0.54 NR
23 Southlake, City Of CS Public/Semi-Public 0.88 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent:
Twenty-three (23)
Responses Received Within the 200’ Buffer:
Nine (9) – Attached – Estes Park HOA counted as
one response within 200’, but there are multiple
responses from residents outside 200’.
Notices Received Outside the 200’ Buffer:
Five (5) – Attached – Oak Pointe HOA letter and responses
counted as one response, but there are letters from
multiple residents.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 2
Surrounding Property Owner Responses Within 200 Feet
Page 1 of 2
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 3
Page 2 of 2
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 4
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 5
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 6
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 7
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 8
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 9
Page 1 of 10
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 10
Page 2 of 10
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 11
Page 3 of 10
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 1
Page 4 of 10
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 2
Page 5 of 10
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 3
Page 6 of 10
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 4
Page 7 of 10
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 5
Page 8 of 10
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 6
Page 9 of 10
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 7
Page 10 of 10
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 8
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 9
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 10
Responses Received Outside the 200’ Buffer:
Four (4) – Attached - Oak Pointe HOA letter and
responses counted as one response, but there are letters from multiple residents.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 11
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 12
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 13
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 14
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 15
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 16
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 17
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 18
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 19
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 20
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 21
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 22
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 23
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 24
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 25
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 26
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-069 Page 27
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-591
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF
TRACT 1F AND ALL OF TRACT 1F2, JOEL W. CHIVERS SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 350, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 10.635 ACRES AND MORE
,
FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM
“SF-1A” SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO “S-P-1”
DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH “CS” COMMUNITY
SERVICE DISTRICT USES TO INCLUDE AN INDOOR FIRING
RANGE AS AN ACCESSORY USE, AS DEPICTED ON THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL
WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS
HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS,
the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9
of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
Case No. Attachment G
ZA09-069 Page 1
WHEREAS,
the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “SF-1A” Single Family
Residential District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS,
a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;
noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights
on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of
signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate
neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street
parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces,
and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the
promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of
the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
Case No. Attachment G
ZA09-069 Page 2
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of
those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time
their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents
the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a
necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has
been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or
tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and
therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are
needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of
Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being legally described as a portion of Tract 1F and all of Tract 1F2, Joel W. Chivers
Survey, Abstract No. 350, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being
approximately 10.635 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A”
Case No. Attachment G
ZA09-069 Page 3
from “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
with “CS” Community Service District uses to include an indoor firing range as an
accessory use, as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit “B,” and subject to the following conditions:
S-P-1 Regulations and Variance Request Letter
Reserved for Approved S-P-1 and Variance Request Letter
1. Subject to Site Plan Review Summary No.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are
not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present
conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen
congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to
avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
Case No. Attachment G
ZA09-069 Page 4
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be
declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or
Case No. Attachment G
ZA09-069 Page 5
not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a
public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if
this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section
3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA09-069 Page 6
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the ____ day of ______, 2010.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the ___ day of ________, 2010.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
Case No. Attachment G
ZA09-069 Page 7
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment G
ZA09-069 Page 8
EXHIBIT “A”
Being legally described as a portion of Tract 1, a portion of Tract 2A, a portion of tract 2B1 and a
portion of Tract 3,Thomas Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049, City of Southlake, Tarrant County,
Texas, being approximately 24.935 acres, and more fully and completely described as follows:
Reserved for Metes and Bounds
Case No. Attachment G
ZA09-069 Page 9
EXHIBIT “B”
Reserved for Approved Site Plan
Case No. Attachment G
ZA09-069 Page 10