Loading...
Item 6D (2)* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Horizontal Light Levels - Adjusted Next Vertical Light Levels - Adjusted Next Vertical Light Levels - Adjusted Dove Trail Crosswalk 4th Field? Questions? Park Usage FUA Site Analysis Criteria Acreage / size Topography Access Residential adjacency TAD Values Map Analysis Preliminary Site Layout Several potential field layouts were considered Musco Light-Structure Green Sports Field Lighting Examples North Park Proposed Lighting North Park Proposed Lighting View of Fence from Summit Ridge Dr. BEFORE Fencing Plan Southlake Carroll Lacrosse Association Spring season (Feb – May) w/ three tournaments Fall season (Aug – Nov) w/ one tournament Summer camps Rec leagues practice two days/week & Saturday High school level practices 5 days/week w/ Sat & Sun games City Managed Flag Football Program Spring season (March – May) w/ one tournament Fall season (Sept – Nov) w/one tournament Each team practices one hour/week w/day games on Saturday Park Usage Info Return Field Usage and Lights (Per Current FUA) May not begin until: 4pm M-F, 8am Sat & 12pm Sun Must end by: 10pm Sun-Thurs and 11pm Fri-Sat Lights out by: 10:30pm Sun-Thurs and 11:30pm Fri-Sat Park Usage Info Return * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * North Park Site Plan 2nd Reading Project Overview and Objectives Background Community Input and Staff Response Questions Agenda City of Southlake Strategy Map The City of Southlake provides municipal services that support the highest quality of life for our residents and businesses. We do this by delivering outstanding value and unrivaled quality in everything that we do. Fulfill Our Mission Live Our Core Values Promote Learning and Growth Provide Financial Stewardship Serve Our Customers C1 Achieve the highest standards of safety and security C3 Provide attractive and unique spaces for enjoyment of personal interests C4 Attract and keep top-tier businesses to drive a dynamic and sustainable economic environment C2 Provide travel convenience within City and region B6 Optimize use of technology B1 Achieve best-in-class status in all City disciplines B5 Improve performance of delivery and operational processes B4 Provide high quality customer service B2 Collaborate with select partners to implement service solutions F1 Adhere to financial management principles and budget F3 Achieve fiscal wellness standards F4 Establish and maintain effective internal controls F2 Invest to provide and maintain high quality public assets Manage the Business Safety and Security L2 Enhance leadership capabilities to deliver results L3 Attract, develop and retain a skilled workforce L1 Ensure our people understand the strategy and how they contribute to it L4 Recognize and reward high performers C5 Promote opportunities for partnerships and volunteer involvement Deliver on Our Focus Areas Integrity ● Innovation ● Accountability ● Commitment to Excellence ● Teamwork B3 Enhance resident quality of life and business sustainability through tourism L5 Empower informed decision-making at all levels in the organization Infrastructure Quality Development Mobility Performance Management and Service Delivery Partnerships and Volunteerism 3 Lighted Multipurpose Fields (Lacrosse & Flag FB) Playground Plaza Area (Concession, RR & Pavilion) Joint Parking with DPS Facility Open space Trails Careful consideration of impact on neighbors Coordinate planning with the DPS site Provide attractive amenities that increase property values North Park Project - Additional Objectives Background February 2006 CS Department prepared analysis of 5 sites September 11, 2007 CS Director presented proposal to CCPD Board for SPDC to reimburse CCPD for 22.6 Acres of North DPS Site for Multi-Purpose Fields for Park Use March 2009 Analysis of 30 potential sites June 16, 2009 SRA contract to design North Park August 3, 2009 North Park ranked #3 Priority (FY10 SPDC CIP) at Joint Park Board, SPDC, and City Council meeting September 9, 2009 Park Board recommended preliminary site layout September 15, 2009 City Council approved FY10 SPDC CIP Background: Citizen Input / Board Review November 9, 2009 SPIN Meeting (40 attended) Concerns: lighting, noise, traffic February 8, 2010 Parks Board recommended Site Plan approval (6-1) Concerns: fencing, lighting, noise, hours of operation, traffic & pedestrian gate access February 18, 2010 P & Z recommended Site Plan approval (5-0) Concerns: fencing, lighting, noise, hours of operation, traffic, pedestrian gate access & trash Community Input and Our Response Residents Said City’s Response Cost “Too many fields” “Fields too close to homes along Ridgecrest” Removed (1) lighted field “Light from the fields will spillover” Lighting designed to minimize impact “Parking lot lighting will shine into homes” Minimized parking lot lighting “Park access from Oak Pointe will burden neighborhood” Restricted gate access from Oak Pointe OR No gate access from Oak Pointe $10,000 (if gate) Residents Said City’s Response Cost “Trees need to be larger to block view into homes” Added extensive landscape buffer w/ larger trees $39,000 “People using the park will be able to see into my home / property” 6’ Wrought iron fence & add’l landscaping adjacent to residents along Ridgecrest $33,000 “Park use will be noisy” Added extensive landscape buffer & stone fencing “People parking and dropping-off on Ridgecrest will impact neighborhood” “No Parking” signs along Ridgecrest 6’ Wrought iron fence along Ridgecrest – not required $42,000 Community Input and Our Response Residents Said City’s Response Cost “Continuous 8’ tall ‘industrial’ concrete panel fence is ugly” 6’ stone wall w/ intermittent wrought iron panels (stone wall shall obscure houses & garages from park view) 6’ concrete panel wall to match DPS along western boundary $67,000 $50,000 “Park use will be noisy” Added extensive landscape buffer & stone fencing “Traffic will increase on Dove” Conducted a Traffic Impact Analysis – Constructing a west bound decel lane on N. side of Dove at main entry $12,250 Community Input and Our Response Residents Said City’s Response Cost “Trash generated from park use will litter my property” Parks Div will be responsible for trash via weekend staff and/or contract support Community Input and Our Response Proposed Site Plan 162’ 142’ 127’ 170’ 159’ Perspective from Dove Rd. North Perspective North Perspective - Plaza Southeast Perspective - Plaza Southeast Perspective - Fields South Perspective South Perspective - Fields South Perspective – Ground Level South Perspective - Plaza East Perspective - Fields East Perspective - Plaza West Perspective - Plaza Cross Section of Field Elevations SPDC/CC Staff’s Response Cost SPDC - Extend trail 400’ along SE to pond Added to project scope $20,000 SDPC - No gate Removed from project scope $0 CC – Increase landscape buffer Enhanced landscape buffer with strategically placed canopy trees $0 CC – Decrease light spillage Tweaked angle of lights to improved horizontal & vertical foot candles $0 CC – How do pedestrians cross Dove? Crosswalk extension part of the Dove Trail project $0 Action Since 1st Reading #4 Landscape Plan Revisions – Canopy Trees BUFFERYARD: Canopy Trees 64 Required 165 Provided Includes – (15) Live Oaks (6”) (21) Eldarica Pines Sports Lighting without Landscape Buffer Next Sports Lighting without Landscape Buffer Horizontal Light Levels - Adjusted Next * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *