The URL can be used to link to this page

FINAL AgendaREGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 7, 2006 LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, Texas Council Chambers in Town Hall WORK SESSION: 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. 1. Call to order. 2. Invocation: Coy Quesenbury, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church 3. Discuss Regional Rail Initiatives. 4. Discuss Ordinance No. 704-C, proposed amendments to the sign ordinance. 5. Discuss all items on tonight’s meeting agenda. No action will be taken and each item will be considered during the Regular Session. REGULAR SESSION: 6:00 p.m. or immediately following the work session. Executive Session. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in Executive Session. 3A. Mayor’s Report 3B. City Manager’s Report 1. Recognition of Community Services for TAAF Platinum Member City / Park Rodeo presentation 3C. Local Business Report Consent Agenda: 4A. Approve the minutes from the October 17, 2006, regular City Council meeting, and the October 26, 2006, Joint City Council and P&Z Commission meeting. 4B. Excuse members of the City Council and the P&Z Commission for absences from meetings. 4C. Rescind award of bid to ADP, Inc., for payroll outsourcing. 4D. Award annual purchasing agreements for utility parts and supplies to Atlas Utility Supply, Hughes Supply, Ferguson Enterprises, and Techline Pipe. 4E. Resolution No. 06-066, Approve a resolution in support of the City of Grapevine and Tarrant County’s request to pursue “Pass Through” financing on S.H. 26 in Grapevine. 4F. Authorize the purchase of an aerial ladder truck from Sutphen Corp. in the amount of $985.391. 4G. Authorize a contract with Lee Lewis Construction for construction management duties relating to the construction of the new DPS Headquarters. 4H. Resolution No. 06-067, Establish the City of Southlake’ Legislative Agenda for the 80th Texas Legislative Session. 4I. Award of bid to Branch Smith Printing Co. in the amount of $25,417 for annual printing of the Southlake Scene Brochure. 4J. ZA06-068, Revised Concept Plan for Kimball Hills at 616 S. Kimball Ave. Current Zoning: SF-2OA. SPIN #8. THE APPLICANT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS ITEM. 4K. Ordinance No. 897, 2nd Reading, Amending Ch. 18, Sect. 18-79 of the Southlake City Code establishing a new speed limit on a portion of N. Carroll Ave. and on 2 portions of Kimball Ave. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TABLED. REGULAR AGENDA: 5. Public Forum. 6A. Ordinance No. 480-503, 2nd Reading (ZA06-119), Zoning Change and Development Plan for proposed La Mirada at 1925 N. Peytonville Ave. Current Zoning: RE. Requested Zoning: R-PUD. SPIN #11. PUBLIC HEARING 6B. ZA06-120, Preliminary Plat for La Mirada at 1925 N. Peytonville Ave. Current Zoning: RE. Proposed Zoning: R-PUD. SPIN #11. 6C. Ordinance No. 480-NNN, 2nd Reading, Amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, including sidewalk requirements and minimum lot size standards for open space lots in residential zoning districts. PUBLIC HEARING 6D. Ordinance No. 483-K, 2nd Reading, Amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, including sidewalk requirements. PUBLIC HEARING 6E. Ordinance No. 480-508, 2nd Reading (ZA06-117), Zoning Change and Concept Plan for 1611 E. Dove Rd. Current Zoning: AG. Requested Zoning: SF-1A. SPIN #5. PUBLIC HEARING 6F. Ordinance No. 480-422a, 2nd Reading (ZA06-147), Zoning Change and Site Plan for Westgate Plaza, at 2300 E. S.H. 114. Current Zoning: S-P-1. Requested Zoning: S-P-1. SPIN #6. PUBLIC HEARING 6G. ZA06-103, Plat Showing for T. Easter No. 458 Addition, being approx. 1 acre of land located at 2300 E. S.H. 114. Current Zoning: S-P-1. SPIN #6. 6H. ZA06-135, Site Plan for Lot 2R1, Block 60, Pecan Creek at 409 Byron Nelson Pkwy. Current Zoning: R-PUD. SPIN #9E. PUBLIC HEARING 6I. Resolution No. 06-069, (ZA06-158), Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages at Campania Pizza & More, at 291 Grand Ave. Current Zoning: DT. SPIN #8. PUBLIC HEARING 6J. ZA06-162, Revised Site Plan for Lot 2R, Block 3R2, Southlake Town Square for Robb & Stuckey at 301 State St. Current Zoning: DT. SPIN #8. PUBLIC HEARING 6K. Ordinance No. 868-A, 2nd Reading, Amendment to the building code to allow a blanket certificate of occupancy for executive suites (excluding medical uses). PUBLIC HEARING 7A. Ordinance No. 480-OOO, 1st Reading, Miscellaneous amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, including: density and use standards in the Transition Zoning District; Specific Use Permit requirements for alcohol sales; open space management plan standards for residential zoning districts; parking variance allowance and Section 4, Definitions. There are no items on this agenda. 9A. Consider SP06-401, Conditional Sign Permit for Jellico Square located at the northwest corner of W. Southlake Blvd. and Randol Mill Ave. 9B. Consider SP06-463, Variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-B for Dr. Hebert Office Building located at 170 Players Circle in Players Circle Addition. 9C. Consider SP06-462, Variance to Sign Ordinance No. 704-B for Subway, located at 1959 W. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100, in Players Circle Addition. There are no items on this agenda. Meeting adjourned. Regional Transportation:The Prospect of Regional Rail City Council Discussion Item 4D November 7, 2006 Why discuss it? Regional Growth Congestion Projections Facility Funding Constraints Regional Activity RTC Study Regional Transit System Review Committee established by HB 2702 (79th Texas Legislature) Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition Citizen Survey Citizen Survey – Key Findings The University of Texas at Dallas Conducted Aug-Sept, 2006 Purpose: To conduct a public opinion study on support for regional rail expansion; and, financing options for that expansion 4,077 interviews – 8 counties Citizen Survey – Key Findings 62.9% support – “to fund an expansion of the rail transit system in the DFW metroplex” Use of Sales Tax Revenue – 61.3% favor areawide infrastructure improvements over 38.7% favoring economic development in individual cities. Citizen Survey – Key Findings 82.3% agree – “DFW area is way behind other large metropolitan areas when it comes to efficient, modern mass transit systems.” 85% agree – “Rail would help them-even if they didn’t use it – by getting more cars off the road and making it easier to drive around the area” Statements about Half-Cent Sales Tax 77.7% Agree – “A small price to pay for a modern, coordinated rail system that will reduce traffic congestion, air pollution, time wasted in commuting, and personal energy costs.” Only 1 out of 4 agree – “with the level of taxation already high, I won’t support an increase in taxes, no matter how good the cause” Next Steps Local Government Support 80th Texas Legislature Additional Remarks B. Glen Whitley Tarrant County Commissioner Past Chairman – Regional Transportation Council Local Option Vote Regional Transit System Review Committee established by HB 2702 (79th Texas Legislature) will meet in Nov, 2006 How will local option election be conducted? City by City County by County Subregion by Subregion Region-wide Sign Ordinance Amendments City Council First Reading Reasons to Amend the Ordinance Number of sign variances Desire to create a sense of place/establish uniformity for signage along S.H. 114 Issues with sign style/appearance for signage throughout the city Need to establish criteria for Conditional Sign Permits Window sign provision Administration/staff issues Standards for Signs Signs exempt from permit requirement (Section 5.3) Signs exempt from permit with standards (Section 5.4, Tables 1 & 2) Signs requiring Permits Prohibited Signs(Section 5.2) Generally Temporary Signs incl. Window signs Permanent Signs(Tables 4, 5, & 6) Attached, Special Attached, and Monument signs All Signs Temporary Signs (Banners, Table 3) Signs permitted through Master Sign Plans approved By City Council (Section 8) New Revisions Section 5.3: New Exemptions Permanent non-illuminated names of buildings, dates of erection, monument statues, etc. that are made an integral part of the structure or made flush to the ground Traffic control signs on private property that do not contain a commercial message Address signs no greater than 5 s.f. in area Retail store window displays of merchandise Holiday lights and decorations with no commercial message Reference: Page 10 Back to Sign Flow Chart Section 5.4 Signs Exempt from Permit Classified open house signs with subdivision marketing signs (open house signs are currently not a permitted sign type) Model home signs ( 1 per model home) Reference: Page 11 Back to Sign Flow Chart Window Signs - Current Window signs = signs within 2 feet of the window Signs Exempt from Permit Window signs may not obscure more than 15% of the window area per façade, measured and located within 10 vertical feet from the at-grade exterior entrance to the lease space. Window Signs – Proposed Window signs = signs within 10 feet of the window, excluding addresses, open/closed signs, hours of operation, credit card logos, interior directory signage, mannequins, and storefront displays of merchandise. Signs Exempt from Permit Reference: Page 8 (definition) Window Signs – Proposed (Table 2) Signs Exempt from Permit Reference: Page 13 Back to Sign Flow Chart Section 6: Temporary Signs Requiring a Permit (Table 3) Amended standards for Banners Added 4 new sign types and corresponding standards): grand opening banner, banners in public parks, light pole banners, and sandwich board signs Reference: Pages 13 & 14 Back to Sign Flow Chart Table 4: Permanent Attached Signs 2 major changes in regulations (Why?): Area Area based upon width of lease space Letter Height Letter height based upon distance from edge of pavement and type of street frontage Attached Signs: Area Standards (Table 4) Existing Standard: 0.75 sq.ft. per 1 foot of lease space width (same standard for all lease space widths) Proposed Standard: Based upon the width of the lease space (variance examples) Narrower the lease space width, higher the area allowance Reference: Pages 15-16 Back to Attached Signs Letter Height Standard for Attached Signs Based on the distance from the edge of pavement Based on the typology of the street fronting the lease space Letter/Logo Height Standards for Attached Signs No minimum letter/logo size Allow external lighting for signs on Main Streets Added blade signs for buildings on Main Streets Reference: Pages 15 & 16 Proposed Letter Height Regulations (Table 4) Permanent Attached Signs Reference: Page 15 Proposed Letter Height Regulations Permanent Attached Signs Reference: Page 16 Back to Sign Flow Chart Table 5: Special Attached Signs Special regulations for: Blade signs Menuboard signs Subdivision entry signs Drive through signs Reference: Page 17 Blade Signs Subdivision Entry Signs Drive Through Signs Back to Sign Flow Chart Monument Signs Proposed Changes: Sign regulations (height and area) based on street typology Removed minimum letter/logo size requirement Limitation on number of panels Reference: Page 17 Table 6: Monument Signs Reference: Page 18 Table 7: Special Monument Signs Menuboard signs Drive-through signs Subdivision entry signs Bulletin board signs Directory signs Institutional signs Gasoline pricing signs Directional signs Bulletin board signs Special regulations for: Reference: Pages 18, 19, 20 Back to Sign Flow Chart Section 8: Master Sign Plans Replace Conditional Sign Permits Purpose: Promote consistency among signs in a development Enhance compatibility of signs with the architectural and design features in a development Encourage multi-tenant commercial uses to develop a unique set of sign regulations in conjunction with development standards Reference: Page 21 Sign Design Guidelines (for Master Sign Plans) Based on the Sign Visual Preference Survey recommendations: Compatibility with surroundings Location and Mounting Color Materials Sign legibility Illumination Shopping Center Monument & Store Signs Multi-story corporate offices and hotels Reference: Pages 22 - 27 Back to Sign Flow Chart Banner Temp Signs Requiring a Permit Reference: Page 15 Back to Back to Temporary Signs Grand Opening Banner Temp Signs Requiring a Permit Reference: Page 15 Back to Temporary Signs Sandwich Board Signs Temp Signs Requiring a Permit Reference: Page 15 Back to Temporary Signs Light Pole Banner Sign Permitted only along public streets and in public parks Must be approved by City Council Must be approved by the appropriate utility company prior to consideration by City Council Limited to publicize community-wide events, holidays, public art, and other city sponsored events only Temp Signs Requiring a Permit Reference: Page 15 Back to Temporary Signs Banners in Public Parks Temp Signs Requiring a Permit Reference: Page 15 Back to Temporary Signs Summary of Sign Variances 2003 - Present Summary of Variances Approved (2003 – June 2006) Summary of Variances Approved (2003 – 2006) Back to Attached Signs Area Standards for Attached Signs – Coffee Beanery Example Storefront width = 16 feet Current Ordinance permissible area = 12 sq.ft. Proposed Ordinance permissible area = 19.2 sq.ft. Current Sign Area = 22 sq.ft. (Variance granted in 2006) Area Standards for Attached Signs: Ella Bella Example 16’ Area Standards for Attached Signs – Taco House Example Storefront width = 17.75’ Current Ordinance permissible area = 13.4 sq.ft. Proposed Ordinance permissible area = 21.3 sq.ft. Current Sign Area = 22 sq.ft. (Variance granted in June 2006) Back to Area Standards for Attached Signs Street TypologyMap Back Overview of Recommended Changes to Real Estate/Leasing Signs Real Estate/Leasing signs for NEW Development will now require a permit and shall only be permitted for one year. Leasing/for sale signs for EXISTING Development after the first year shall be 4 sq.ft. and shall meet design criteria specified Residential real estate signs shall be regulated separately Land Sign Development/Construction Sign New Construction For Sale/Leasing Signs (I year max) + Existing Building For Sale/Leasing Signs + Recommended Standards Recommended Standards + Recommended Standards Design Palette Options:Monument Signs Monument Sign Standards 4” – 6” of masonry around the sign Sign structure height not to exceed 3 feet Area per sign face not to exceed 4 sq.ft. A sign cap, coping, or pediment is required. Design Palette Options: Ground Signs Design Options Design Options Ground Sign Standards Height not to exceed 4 feet Area per sign face not to exceed 12 sq.ft. (P&Z Recommendation) Sign posts to be a minimum of 4” wide with painted metal or wood frames. Decorative moldings are required with posts and sign frames (not to exceed 9” over the top of the sign) P&Z Action Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval on with the following conditions: Real estate/leasing signs to be ground signs limited to 12 sq. ft. in area and 5 feet in height with 4 inch posts. Staff to come up with a design palette for a standard real estate ground sign for Council's review. This design would specify the frame and post design only. Property owners may only have their leasing information on an existing monument sign or have the standard ground sign as established by the City but not on both. Logos may be 125% of the permitted letter height in any attached sign Questions? Back to Sign Flow Chart Rescind Award of Bid to ADP, Inc. for Payroll Outsourcing And Reject all bids for RFP0605A160SG600103 Item 4C Initial Timeline June 30, 2006 Bids received from ADP, Inc. and Sage Payroll for outsourcing payroll August 7, 2006 ADP responds via e-mail, “This email confirms that we agree with the letter’s content,” regarding the Letter of Agreement for RFP.06.05A.160.SG.600103 August 15, 2006 City Council awards bid to ADP, Inc. August 23, 2006 ADP requests signature on Master Accounts Agreement which is forwarded to TOASE for review Initial Timeline (cont.) August 30, 2006 Review from legal counsel recommending the City not sign the ADP document in its current form…”Several provisions are not only unfavorable to the City, but may also not be provisions the City may legally enter into.” October 3, 2006 through October 20, 2006 Staff and legal counsel worked to resolve the unacceptable provisions of the Master Accounts Agreement that ADP insists are not negotiable…indemnity and warranty clauses that limit ADP’s financial responsibility to approximately $4,500 on any claim Staff Recommendation to Council Rescind award to ADP, Inc. Reject all bids for RFP.06.05A.160.SG.600103 Questions Item 4D Award annual purchasing agreements for utility parts and supplies to: Atlas Utility Supply, Hughes Supply, Fergusson Enterprises; and, Techline Pipe Annual Purchasing Agreement Utility Parts and Supplies Purpose: Numerous purchases of utility parts and supplies required to maintain water and sewer systems Reduce staff time required for redundant bid processing Provide for competitive pricing to facilitate purchases Annual Purchasing Agreement Utility Parts and Supplies Process: To provide for best possible value, supplies were divided into categories Staff solicited sealed bids for the most commonly used supplies from local vendors Five bids were received on October 20th, 2006 Annual Purchasing Agreement Utility Parts and Supplies RECOMMENDATION: Award the annual agreements to Atlas Utility Supply, Hughes Supply, Fergusson Enterprises; and, Techline Pipe Annual Purchasing Agreement Utility Parts and Supplies Funding: Funds are available FY 07 Utility Fund Operating budget Water and Wastewater Divisions Annual Purchasing Agreement Utility Parts and Supplies Questions? Item 4E Resolution 06-066, Approve a resolution in support of the City of Grapevine and Tarrant County’s request to pursue “Pass Through” Financing on State Highway 26 in Grapevine Resolution 06-066 City of Grapevine and Tarrant County Request to TxDOT Application for reimbursement funding to construct Grapevine portion of SH 26 TxDOT to pay entities back over reasonable time (~10 Yrs.) Resolution 06-066 Initial Construction Funds to be Provided: City of Grapevine - $2,000,000 Tarrant County - $6,400,000 Resolution 06-066 Initial Funding State does not have short-term funding available “Pass Through” funding allows project to proceed in concert w/ Colleyville section of SH 26 Resolution 06-066 City of Grapevine and Tarrant County requests support of “Pass Through” funding request Letter of support to Texas Transportation Commission Questions? Item 4F Approve the purchase of a Sutphen SPH-100 aerial platform Selection Considerations Narrow streets with reduced turning radius at Town Square Access to multi-story, high occupancy locations (Sabre, Hilton, Watermere) Safety features for personnel Key Features 230” wheelbase Overall length 45’ 9” References Larger bucket More storage Safety features Timeline November 7, 2006: City Council approve purchase January, 2007: Slot reserved on assembly line September 10, 2007: Completion date Sutphen SPH-100 Aerial Platform Questions? Item 4G Consider: Consider entering into a professional services agreement with Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. for construction management of a new centrally located Department of Public Safety facility. Professional Services Agreement with Lee Lewis Construction Professional services include in general the following: Preliminary evaluation of the project program and budget requirements; Preliminary cost estimations; Detailed cost estimates as project develops; Identify subcontractors and suppliers; Propose a Guaranteed Maximum Price; Administer construction. Professional Services Agreement with Lee Lewis Construction Lee Lewis Construction: Recommended based on prior work on the planned north DPS facility originally selected to perform construction management of north DPS facility Lee Lewis Construction demonstrated good presentation and communication skills and a strong desire to work with City officials Well known firm in the Dallas/Fort Worth area Professional Services Agreement with Lee Lewis Construction Project cost ($480,000) 4% of estimated $12 million construction costs Funding available as part of amended FY 2006-07 CCPD budget for DPS facility design and construction Crime Control Board recommended approval (7-0) at their April 5, 2006 meeting Professional Services Agreement with Lee Lewis Construction Professional Services Agreement with Lee Lewis Construction Questions/ Comments? Item 4HResolution No. 06-067Adopting the City of Southlake's Legislative Agenda City Council November 7, 2006 Why Have a Legislative Agenda To preserve the City’s current authority to govern To ensure awareness of the City’s position regarding certain legislative issues To provide local State Representatives with information to aid the City with its legislative agenda City of Southlake’s General Legislative Policy Preserve the City’s strategic goals and interests Support legislation advancing the City’s strategic goals and interests Form coalitions with other parties that share City’s common goals and interests City of Southlake’s Priority Legislative Agenda (con’t) Preserve Local Budgeting Authority and Revenue Sources Oppose legislation that would unduly restrict the ability of the City to set its own budget or raise the necessary revenue to provide services to City residents and businesses. City of Southlake’s Priority Legislative Agenda (con’t) Preserve Local Control of Land Use Planning and Zoning Support legislation that preserves local land use authority. Oppose legislation that would erode local land use authority by restricting the ability of cities to zone or rezone properties. City of Southlake’s Priority Legislative Agenda Expanded Use of Hotel Occupancy Taxes Seek passage of legislation that would allow hotel occupancy taxes to be used to fund a municipal trolley system that shuttles people to and from local hotels and around the town square. City of Southlake’s Priority Legislative Agenda Municipal Water Main Breaks and the Discharge of Treated Water Seek passage of legislation that exempts treated water discharges associated with water main breaks from Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) enforcement actions. Agenda Item 4H Questions? Please Contact Jim C. Blagg Assistant City Manager Item 4I: Award of bid to Branch Smith Printing Company in the amount of $25,417 for annual printing of the Southlake Scene Brochure Southlake Scene recreation brochure distributed to approx. 8,200 local addresses Recently bid annual printing services for Fall/Winter, Spring, and Summer editions Attorney review of RFB One bid received from Branch Smith Printing Company in the amount of $25,417 Bid is within budgeted amount Contractor responsible for: Printing (3 issues) Delivery to City Completion of printing within 10 days of submittal from City Contractor Background/References: Established in 1910 in Fort Worth, 96 years of experience, 87 employees Provided quality printing service to City previous two years Positive reference check with City of Euless and Keller ISD Recommend award of bid to Branch Smith Printing Company for annual printing of the Southlake Scene recreation brochure in the amount of $25,417 Staff is available for questions and seeks City Council direction Items 6A ZA06-119 and 6B ZA06-120 OWNER: St. Emillion Partners APPLICANT: Adams Engineering REQUEST: 1) Approval of Second Reading for a zoning change and development plan from “RE” Single Family Residential Estates to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District. 2) Approval of a preliminary plat proposing 8 single family lots on approximately 11.61 acres. LOCATION: The property is located at 1925 N. Peytonville Avenue. ZA06-119 “R-PUD” Regulations: The development will follow the uses and regulations of the “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District and the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the following exceptions: 1) Minimum 50’ front yard on Lots 1 – 6 and Lot 8 2) Minimum 40’ right-of-way with 28’ pavement width face of curb to face of curb 3) Minimum centerline curve radii of 180’ ZA06-119 Site Data Gross Acreage: 11.61 acres Net Acreage: 10.62 acres Area of R.O.W.: 0.99 acres Area of Open Space: 1.20 acres (10.38% of gross area) Number of Lots: 8 single family residential lots Gross Density: 0.69 DU/Acre Net Density: 0.75 DU/Acre Average Lot Size: 1.18 acres (51,292 square feet) Previously Presented Plan Revised Plan Tree Survey Landscape Plan Tree Conservation Plan Item 6A ZA06-119 P&Z ACTION: September 7, 2006; Approved (4-3) subject to review; with the addition of landscaping buffer; lessen building line on lot 6; increase berm size north of cul de sac; increase the rear set back on lot 6 to 50 feet; and, provide a landscape plan to City Council. COUNCIL ACTION: October 3, 2006; Approved first reading (5-1); requesting that the applicant work with neighbors, in particular with respect to the configuration of Lot 8; provide fencing and screening details; and identify detailed locations for burying utilities. Item 6B ZA06-120 P&Z ACTION: September 7, 2006; Approved (4-3) subject to review and subject to the conditions of the zoning and development plan. Questions? View looking North toward subject property N. Peytonville Ave Brittany Ct. N. Peytonville Ave Laurel Ln Brittany Ct View looking West toward subject property Laurel Ln N. Peytonville Ave Brittany Ct View looking East toward subject property Landscape Plan Tree Survey Public Works Presentation Proposed 8” waterline to tie in to 12” waterline on N. Peytonville Ave and 6” waterline on Brittany Ct Proposed 8” sewerline to tie in to existing 8” sewerline on west side of N. Peytonville Ave Proposed Manhole Proposed Utility Plan Proposed Drainage Plan Storm Sewer Outflow Structure Questions? Previously Submitted Development Plan – Withdrawn June 15, 2006 Items 6C and 6DSecond ReadingsProposed Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance Amendments Ordinance 480-NNN & Ordinance 483-K Ordinance 480-NNN & 483-K Moving of accessory structures in the front yards from the Special Exception Use table to the Specific Use Permit table (pages 10 and 17), Elimination of airports as an allowable use in the Specific Use Permit table in the C-3 district (page 15), Elimination of residential lofts as an allowable use in the Specific Use Permit table in the C-3 district (page 16), and Clarification of the requirement for sidewalks for all residential and nonresidential development (pages 23 and 24). The changes above have been incorporated with the original Ordinances 480-NNN and 483 K as presented at the two earlier meetings: Changes since the October 17th meeting include: Overview Ordinance 480-NNN: Amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance to: Section 7, General District Regulations; Section 11, SF-1A District; Section 13, SF-30 District; Section 14, SF-20A District; Section 29, MH District; Section 33, Supplementary District Regulations; Section 42, Bufferyards; Section 44, Board of Adjustment; and Section 45, Specific Use Permits Ordinance 483-K: Amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance to: Section 4.01 Section 5.06 Ordinance 480-NNN Section 7 – General District Regulations: Addition of the newly created SF-2, RCS, TZD, and EC zoning districts to the list of zoning districts Section 7 of the Zoning Ordinance Addition of RCS, TZD, EC and SF-2 districts Sections 11, 13,14, and 29 Sections 11 (SF-1A), 13 (SF-30), 14 (SF-20A), 29 (MH) Clarifying that open space lots shall be the only exception to the lot area requirements in each respective residential zoning district Ordinance 480-NNN Section 33, Supplementary District Regulations Addition of requirements for sidewalks for all development requiring Council approved site plans 33.19 SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS – For all development requiring a City Council approved site plan, a five (5)-foot wide concrete sidewalk shall be provided along all public streets unless identified in the city’s Pathways Plan in which case Ordinance 483, Section 5.06 shall apply. In addition, all non-residential development shall provide pedestrian access to the City’s existing or future trail system as identified in any City Council adopted plan. Section 42 Section 42, Bufferyards Addition of the newly created RCS and SF-2 districts to the bufferyard table (Table One- p. 9) Section 45 Addition of the newly created SF-2, RCS, TZD, and EC zoning districts under the appropriate Special Exception uses and Specific uses Ordinance 483-K Amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance to Section 5.06 Sidewalks: Clarification of non-residential sidewalk requirements requiring sidewalks on both sides of the street in all residential subdivisions. Ordinance 483-K Amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance to Section 4.01 (F) The City Council shall approve the standard form of the developer’s agreement. The City Manager is authorized to execute a developer’s agreement unless the developer requests an amendment to the provisions of the standard agreement or the agreement provides for one or more of the following: a. an expenditure of 25,000 or more by the city; b. waiver of fees; c. the dedication of park land; or d. credits for prior or proposed improvements or dedications. e. If the developer’s agreement includes any of the foregoing provisions, or an amendment to the standard form agreement, the agreement shall be approved by City Council. Items 7B & 7C 480-NNN & 483-K P&Z ACTION: Approved (6-0) all amendments as presented. COUNCIL ACTION: Approved (6-0) all amendments first readings on consent on October 3, 2006. Questions/Comments? Item 6E ZA06-117 OWNER & APPLICANT: James & Stephanie Anderson REQUEST: Approval of a second reading for zoning change and concept plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District on property being approximately 2.14 acres. LOCATION: The property is located at 1611 E. Dove Street. Concept Plan 572’ Concept Plan Tree Conservation Plan 572’ Item 6E ZA06-117 P&Z ACTION: Approved (6-0) as presented subject to review. COUNCIL ACTION: Approved first reading (5-0) on consent. Questions? 1 View looking west at property E. Dove Rd Lonesome Dove Ave Items 6F and 6G ZA06-147 & ZA06-103 OWNER: Eye Consultants Properties APPLICANT: Pate Engineers REQUEST: 1) Approval of a second reading for zoning change and site plan from “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District with “C-3” General Commercial District uses to include parking as a permitted principal use. 2) Approval of a multiple-lot plat showing containing approximately 1.018 acres and proposing four (4) lots for retail development. LOCATION: The property is located on the north side of E. State Highway 114 west of Grapevine Plaza (westbound access road of State Highway 114). ZA06-147 “S-P-1” Regulations: Under the “S-P-1” zoning the applicant proposes the following: • The proposed permitted uses are to include all “C-3” General Commercial District uses with an addition to include parking as a permitted principal use • Bufferyards – Bufferyards along the perimeter site boundary shall adhere to the requirements of Sections 42 & 43, except that: o No bufferyards shall be required along lot lines interior to the site boundary Previously Approved Site Plan Average distance = 40’ Revised Site Plan Revised Site Plan Average distance = 25’ Stacking: Approved = 50’ Provided = 44’ Tree Conservation Plan Multiple-Lot Plat Showing Item 6F ZA06-147 P&Z ACTION: October 5, 2006; Approved (7-0) subject to review; and granting the requested variance to stacking depth and deferring to the Park Board on eliminating a portion of the multi-use trail. COUNCIL ACTION: Approved first reading (5-0) on consent. Item 6G ZA06-103 P&Z ACTION: October 5, 2006; Approved (7-0) subject to review. Questions? View looking north towards property View looking west towards property Public Works Presentation Grading Plan Drainage Plan Questions? Item 6H ZA06-135 OWNER/ APPLICANT: Pecan Creek Southlake Partners REQUEST: Approval of a site plan for Lot 2R1, Block 60, Timarron Addition Phase 5, proposing the development of a general office building totaling approximately 7,500 square feet on a lot of approximately 1.112 acres. LOCATION: The property is located at 601 Zena Rucker Road. ZA06-135 Site Data Gross/Net Acreage: 1.112 acres Number of Buildings: 1 general office buildings Square Footage: 7,500 square feet Parking Required: 30 spaces Parking Provided: 40 spaces Open Space: 23,385 square feet (48%) Impervious Cover: 25,090 square feet (52%) Approved Development Plan Approved Development Plan Stacking approved at 17 ft. Site Plan East Elevation West Elevation North Elevation South Elevation Landscape Plan Item 6H ZA06-135 P&Z ACTION: Approved (6-0) subject to review. Questions? Public Works Presentation Preliminary Utility Plan Preliminary Drainage Plan Questions? Item 6I ZA06-158 OWNER: SLTS Grand Avenue LP APPLICANT: Campania Pizza & More REQUEST: Approval of a Specific Use Permit for the Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. LOCATION: The property is located at 291 Grand Avenue in Southlake Town Square. Town Hall West Parking Garage East Parking Garage Campania Pizza & More Campania Pizza & More Item 6I ZA06-158 P&Z ACTION: Approved (6-0) subject to the terms of the lease. Questions? Item 6J ZA06-162 OWNER: SLTS Grand Avenue LP APPLICANT: Cooper & Stebbins REQUEST: Approval of a Revised Site Plan for Robb & Stuckey. LOCATION: The property is located at 301 State Street in Southlake Town Square. West Parking Garage Town Hall Container Store Post Office Robb & Stuckey Site Site Plan – Grand Avenue District Area of change Town Hall Previously Approved Elevations Revised Elevations 1 1 Revised Elevations 1 2 3 1 2 3 Item 6J ZA06-162 P&Z ACTION: Approved (6-0) subject to review. Questions? Item 6KOrdinance No. 868-A, 2nd Reading, Amendment to the Building Code to allow a blanket certificate of occupancy for executive suites (excluding medical uses). Purpose of the Amendment The current ordinance requires that each occupant or tenant of a building receive a certificate of occupancy from the city. Regulation applies to all tenants occupying space within executive suites. Proposed amendment will allow a single or blanket certificate of occupancy to be issued for executive suites, except in cases where medical uses will occupy the building. Executive Suite-Certificate of Occupancy The building inspections division has identified executive suites operating at the following locations: - 250 W. Southlake Blvd. - 2855 Exchange Blvd. - 1695 E. Southlake Blvd. - 1500 Corporate Circle - 181 Grand Ave. - 630 E. Southlake Blvd. Executive Suite-Certificate of Occupancy Fort Worth Little Elm Burleson Wichita Falls Westlake Grapevine Plano Arlington Irving Blanket CO Issued to Owner/Manager Executive Suite-Certificate of Occupancy Re-occupancy Certificate for each tenant Keller Carrollton Mesquite QUESTIONS Item 7A1st Reading - Ordinance 480-OOO Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance November 7, 2006 Overview of 480-OOO Zoning Ordinance Amendments as they relate to the following: - Density standards in the Transition Zoning District; Increase in the variance allowance for shared parking; Elimination of SUP requirement for sale of alcoholic beverages and clarification of related definitions; and Open space management requirements for residential zoning districts. Amendments to Transition Zoning District Section 47 – Transition Zoning District: Addition of a density limit for residential uses at 2 DU/gross acre (p.10) Elimination of “Single-family attached” dwelling unit (p. 10) Amendments to Shared Parking Standards Section 43 – Overlay Zones: Increase in the variance allowance for shared parking from 10% to 15% in conjunction with a parking study Amendments to Alcohol Sales SUP Section 4 – Definitions, Add definitions for: Restaurant: An establishment that primarily serves food prepared in the kitchen of the same establishment for patrons and may serve alcohol with a valid Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission License as long as the establishment derives less than 75% of its gross revenues from alcohol sales. Bar or Tavern: An establishment that derives 75 percent or more of the establishment’s gross revenue from the on-premise sale of alcoholic beverages. Section 45 – Specific Use Permits Elimination of SUP requirement for alcohol sales Addition of SUP requirement for Bars and taverns Open Space Management Plan All residential districts: Addition of Open Space Management Plan standards for all development proposing any open space: Distribution of responsibility and guidelines for the maintenance and operation of the protected open space An estimate of the costs and staffing requirements needed for maintenance and operation of, and insurance for, the protected open space A provision for enforcement of the open space management plan Accessory Buildings & PODs P&Z Commission recommended that the proposed regulations for these items receive public input through the SPIN process. Item 6J ZA06-162 P&Z ACTION: Approved (6-0) for the following items under 480-OOO in the P&Z memo dated October 19, 2006: Item 1 (a) approving only the definitions for Restaurants and Bars and Taverns; Item 3 (a); Item 5 (a); Item 7 (a) and (b) only; and, Item 8 (a) and (b). The motion included tabling the following items under 480-OOO to the November 7, 2006 P&Z Meeting from the same memo: Item 1 (a) definition of portable storage unit; Item 2 (a); Item 4 (a); Item 6 (a); and, Item 7 (c). . Questions? Item 9A SP06-401 APPLICANT: Chandler Signs on behalf of Armstrong Development LOCATION: Northwest corner of West Southlake Blvd. and Randol Mill Avenue REQUEST: Conditional Sign Permit for Jellico Square (FKA Town Lake Crossing) Location Map Site Plan Proposed Standards – Attached Signs Max. Sign Width/Area: Tenants will be able to achieve the maximum letter height as long as the sign is within the middle 75% of the lease space. Anchor tenant may have additional attached building signage for product categories and store in store businesses. These identifier signs will not be used for promotional or seasonal advertising. Anchor tenant will have two areas dedicated for identifier signs. Proposed Standards – “Identifier” Signs Identifier Signs Identifier Signs Applicant is proposing a total of 5 monument signs: Three multi-tenant monument signs for the shopping center One single-tenant monument sign for the bank One multi-tenant monument sign for the office development Proposed Standards – Monument Signs 1 2A 2C 3B 2B Multi-Tenant Retail Monument Signs (3 Signs) Signs 2A and 2B Sign 2C Single Tenant Monument Sign (1 Sign) Sign 3B Multi-Tenant Office Monument Sign (1 Sign) Sign 1 Monument Sign Materials Shops of Southlake Letters = 30 inches Southlake Marketplace Logo = 42 inches; Letters = 33 inches Stacked Letter Height (Albertson’s + Sav-on) = 78 inches 16’ Letters = 15 inches Stacked Letter Height = 24 inches 24 inch letters 24 s.f. 16 inch letters 15 s.f. 12 – 48 inch letters 100 s.f. (combined) 22 inch letters 31 s.f. 20 inch letters; 21.39 s.f. Player’s Circle 18 inch letters 24 inch letters SP06-401 QUESTIONS? Item 9B SP06-463 APPLICANT: Dr. Wayne Hebert LOCATION: 170 Players Circle REQUEST: Variance to the Sign Ordinance No. 704-B with respect to attached signs. The requested variances are as follows: Dry Clean Super Center Site Plan Subway Proposed Sign; 18 inch letters Proposed Sign; 12 inch letters 34 inch logo West North (facing 1709) Southlake Chiropractic Future Tenant Proposed Sign Proposed Sign Possible Locations for Future Tenant’s Signs Proposed Sign – West Elevation Sign will appear dark during the day and white at night – like Clearview Eyecare and Laser Center’s sign Proposed Sign – North Elevation (facing FM 1709) Future Tenant’s Lease Space Possible Location for Future Tenant’s Sign Sign will appear dark during the day and white at night – like Clearview Eyecare and Laser Center’s sign Adjacent Signs 18 inch letters Adjacent Signs 24 inch letters Clearview Eyecare & Laser Center’s Sign SP06-463 QUESTIONS? Item 9C SP06-462 APPLICANT: Willow Creek Signs on behalf of Subway LOCATION: 1959 W. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100 REQUEST: Variance to the Sign Ordinance No. 704-B with respect to attached signs. The requested variances are as follows: Dry Clean Super Center Site Plan Southlake Chiropractic Proposed Signs 18 inch letters North East Proposed Sign Proposed Sign Sign will appear dark during the day and white at night – like Clearview Eyecare & Laser Center’s sign Adjacent Signs 24 inch letters Adjacent Signs 18 inch letters Clearview Eyecare & Laser Center’s Sign SP06-462 QUESTIONS? Item 10X SP06-464 APPLICANT: Shops of Southlake LOCATION: southeast corner of E. Southlake Blvd. and S. Carroll Ave. REQUEST: SP06-464 QUESTIONS?