Loading...
Item 6DItem 6D ZA07-080 OWNER: Jerry Mills APPLICANT: Tri-Tech DFW Surveying REQUEST: Approval of second reading for a Zoning Change and Concept Plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “SF-30” Single Family Residential District for the development of one residential lot of 0.94 acre. LOCATION: The property is located at 1090 Primrose Ln. Primrose Lane N. Carroll Ave View looking south towards property Primrose Lane Item 6D ZA07-080 Overall Site Data Gross Acreage: 1.00 acres Net Acreage: 0.94 acres Area of R.O.W.: 0.06 acres Number of Lots: 1 lots Gross Density: 1.00 du/acre Net Density: 1.06 du/acre Avg. Lot Size: 0.94 acres (41,000 sq. ft.) Concept Plan Concept Plan Item 6D ZA07-080 P&Z ACTION: August 23, 2007; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August 17, 2007; granting the requested variances. COUNCIL ACTION: September 4, 2007; Approved first reading on consent. Questions? Public Works Presentation Items 6E & 6F ZA07-085 & ZA07-086 OWNER: Terra Shady Oaks APPLICANT: Sage Group REQUEST: Approval of second reading for a zoning change and concept plan from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. The plan proposes the development of 136 single-family residential lots and 18 open space lots on approximately 96.3 acres. Approval of a preliminary plat for Shady Oaks LOCATION: The property is located at 820 Shady Oaks Drive. Required C2U (60’ R-O-W) W. Highland St. Shady Oaks Dr N. Peytonville Ave Southridge Lakes Pkwy Coventry Southridge Lakes Raven Bend Cross Timber Hills Sandlin Manor View looking east toward property View looking west toward property Views looking across Shady Oaks Dr Views looking across N. Peytonville Ave Items 6E & 6F ZA07-085 & ZA07-086 Overall Site Data 1st Plan 2nd Plan Gross Acreage: 96.3 acres 96.3 acres Net Acreage: 78.8 acres 82.3 acres Area of R.O.W.: 17.5 acres 14.0 acres Number of Lots: 149 lots 154 lots - 136 single family - 136 single family - 13 open space - 18 open space Open Space: 5.48 acres (5.69%) 8.77 acres (9.11%) Gross Density: 1.41 du/acre 1.41 du/acre Net Density: 1.73 du/acre 1.65 du/acre Avg. Lot Size: 0.54 acres 0.54 acres (23,484 sq. ft.) (23,551 sq. ft.) Previously Proposed Concept Plan Previously Proposed Tree Conservation Plan Revised Concept Plan Redesigned plan to eliminate all cul-de-sac streets Increased the open space area by ±3.29 acres (3.42% increase) Revised Tree Conservation Plan Increased tree preservation of 75 trees (from 71% to 83%) Area of desired preservation Per the City’s ERP Map Revised Tree Conservation Plan Increased tree preservation of 75 trees (from 71% to 83%) Variances The following variances are requested: 1) Allow a minimum 40’ ROW instead of a 50’ ROW for the local residential streets is requested. Allow a minimum of 30’ ROW on the one-way streets. The collector street will remain at a minimum 60’ ROW. Allow the collector street geometry as proposed having a minimum 90’ radius with no tangents. A minimum 400’ CL radius and minimum 50’ tangent lengths is required for 2 lane collector streets. 3) Relief from the 40’ driveway to driveway center line spacing requirement and the 50’ driveway to intersection spacing requirement along the collector road. Allow minimum 20’ side yard setback adjacent to the street on corner lots rather than a full front yard setback of 35’. Lots included are Lots 1, 8, 10, Block 2; Lot 9, Block 3; Lots 1 & 10 Block 4; Lots 1 & 10 Block 5; Lots 6 & 7 Block 6; and Lots 5 &7 Block 7. 5) Minimum relief from the 125’ rear lot width requirement is requested on Lots 5, 6, 8-10, Block 1 and Lots 3, 11 and 12, Block 3. Revised Concept Plan Proposed “Collector” does not meet street geometry requirements for collector roadways * Minimum 400’ radius required * Minimum 50’ tangent length required 40’ ROW 40’ ROW Allow a Minimum 20’ Side Yard Setback Adjacent to the Street Lot Width Variance Request 95’ Carroll ISD Involvement CISD’s 2007 Demographics Report projected 52 developed lots on this property by 2011 and 178 lots by 2016 * Estimate based on 136 units and district-wide average student-to-household ratio (0.88 students per household) and district-wide average distribution of student age (35% for Elementary students, 16% for Intermediate students). Estimated Development Impact on Durham Traffic Impact Analysis New Collector at Build-Out Additional Requirements from the 1st Reading Collector street B and C to be built with Phase II. Build a 8’ multi-use trail from Shady Oaks to Peytonville Build a 6’ sidewalk along Shady Oaks and Peytonville adjacent to this project. Build a 6’ sidewalk along the west edge of Ravenbend, connecting the sidewalks of Southridge Lakes to Shady Oaks All applicable conditions and requirements will be incorporated as part of the concept plan and developers agreement. Perimeter walls and fencing per the presentation and attached plan Interior 6’ stone walls along street A per the presentation attached plan Interior fencing per the corner lot fencing plan Pedestrian amenities shall be provided. Items 6E & 6F ZA07-085 & ZA07-086 P&Z ACTION: August 23, 2007; Approved (5-1) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated August 17, 2007; granting the requested variances. August 23, 2007; Approved (5-1) subject to review COUNCIL ACTION: September 4, 2007; Approved (7-0) on first reading subject to: Sidewalks tied in to exterior of the subdivision as presented by the applicant Subject to developer’s presentation Perimeter walls as presented Last lot on Street A – transition for wall by next meeting (Applicant to present) Connector street to be built with phase 2 Interior fencing – wrought iron Fencing on blk 7 lot 5, 6, 7 and all such lots by next meeting (Applicant to present) Developer’s agreement details to be worked out between developer and staff to be approved by Council Granting requested variances (40’ r-o-w, geometric design standards, side yard setback) Subject to Concept Plan review summary Previously Proposed Preliminary Plat PRELIMINARY PLAT Questions? Public Works Presentation Previously Submitted Utility Plan Previously Submitted Drainage Plan Concept Plan Tree Survey Items 6G, 6H, 6I, & 6J CP07-003, ZA07-097, -098, & -099 OWNER/ APPLICANT: Keller Watermere, L.P. & Southlake Watermark Holdings, L.P. REQUEST: 1) Approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Public/Semi-Public to Medium Density Residential. 2) Approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District for the South Village at Watermere. The plan proposes 28 cottage (independent living) units on approximately 4 acres. 3) Approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan from “AG” Agricultural District & “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District. The plan proposes 54 single-family residential detached lots and 6 open space lots on approximately 30 acres. 4) Approval of a preliminary plat for the South Village at Watermere. The plan proposes 54 single family residential lots, one (1) multi-family lot, and six (6) open space lots on approximately 33.72 acres LOCATION: The property is located at 2271 Union Church Rd, 2811 W Southlake Blvd, 2809 W Southlake Blvd, 2815 W Southlake Blvd, 2801 W Southlake Blvd, 2477 Union Church Rd, 2451 Union Church Rd. Proposed LUP Amendment From Public/Semi Public (Blue) to Medium Density Residential (Orange) Original SP-2 New zoning change request Comprehensive Plan Amendment Exhibit Recommended Land Use Mix In the Medium Density Residential designation, the Consolidated Land Use Plan recommends the following mix of uses: Reasons for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicant’s Land Use Mix Original SP-2 New SP-2 boundary New PUD Overall Concept Plan Concept Plan Area added to “S-P-2” zoning Area of “R-PUD” zoning ZA07-097 to Follow Existing Watermere “S-P-2” zoning with the following exception: Phase 2 Cottage (4-plex) Materials ZA07-098 The “R-PUD” zoning proposes to comply with the “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District permitted uses and development regulations with the following exceptions: Min. Lot Size: 9,800 square feet Min. Lot Width: 70 feet at the front building line Min. Lot Depth: 130 feet Min. Floor Area: 2,500 square feet Min. Front Yard: 25 feet Min. Side Yard: 7 feet; 15 feet for corner lot adjacent to street Min. Rear Yard: 25 feet for exterior lots; 20 feet for interior lots Max. Lot Coverage: 60% (Variance from 30% allowed) Min. Garage Setback: 25 feet forward facing; 20 feet swing ZA07-097 & ZA07-098 Overall Site Data Original S-P-2 New S-P-2 R-PUD Total Gross Acreage: 33.53 ac ±36 acres ±30 acres 65.53 acres Cottages (Villas) 85 units 113 units (+28) --- units 113 units Condos 152 units 152 units --- units 152 units Personal Care 60 units 60 units --- units 60 units Memory/Nursing 40 units 40 units --- units 40 units Residential (Detached) --- lots --- lots 54 lots 54 lots 337 units 365 units 54 lots 419 units/lots Density: 10.06 du/acre 10.2 du/acre 1.79 du/acre 6.39 du/acre Open Space: 16.77 ac 16.44 ac 9.52 ac 25.96 ac Open Space %: 50% 46% 32% 40% Color Concept Plan Color Concept Plan – Amenities Center Color Concept Plan Color Concept Plan Color Concept Plan Overall Fence Plan Items 6G, 6H, 6I, & 6J CP07-003, ZA07-097, -098 & -099 P&Z ACTION: CP07-003: August 23, 2007; Approved (6-0) subject to the staff report as presented. ZA07-097: August 23, 2007; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated August 17, 2007. ZA07-098: August 23, 2007; Approved (6-0) subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated August 17, 2007; granting the requested variance. ZA07-099: August 23, 2007; Approved (6-0) subject to Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated August 17, 2007; granting the requested variance. Items 6H & 6I ZA07-097 & ZA07-098 COUNCIL ACTION: ZA07-097: September 4, 2007; Approved first reading (6-1) expanding the first phase and taking 2 acres; Approved subject to P&Z ZA07-098: September 4, 2007; Approved first reading (6-1) Applicant has agreed to match the side elevations with 85% masonry and rear as presented; Age restriction – 55; Subject to applicant’s presentation; Renderings of parking in front of tennis courts and open space along Union Church; Renderings on gates to be used; Approving variances requested; 4 trees per lot; and, Subject to P&Z motion Items 6H & 6I ZA07-097 & ZA07-098 City Council requested the applicant to address the following items at the second reading: Concept Plan Questions? Proposed LUP Amendment From Public/Semi Public (Blue) to Medium Density Residential (Orange) Original SP-2 New zoning change request View looking west toward property View looking east toward property View looking north toward property Union Church Rd Previously Approved Concept Plan Pedestrian Access Plan 8 ft sidewalk 6 ft sidewalk 5 ft sidewalk Landscape Plan Tree Conservation Analysis Concept Plan New area of “S-P-2” zoning ZA07-097 Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Gross/Net Acreage: 33.53 acres ± 36 acres # of units: -Cottages (Villas) 85 units 113 units -Condos (Retirement Res.) 152 units 152 units -Personal Care 60 units 60 units -Memory/Nursing 40 units 40 units 337 units 365 units Density: 10 du/acre 10.2 du/acre The development will follow all regulations and design criteria of the currently approved Watermere project. ZA07-097 (Additional SP-2 Area) Overall Site Data Gross Acreage: ±4 acres Net Acreage: ±4 acres Number of Lots: 1 lot Number of structures: 7 four-unit structures Number of Units: 28 cottages (single family attached) Parking Required: 28 spaces (1 space per unit) Parking Provided: 28 spaces Open Space: ±35% (1.4 acres) Impervious Cover: ±65% (2.3 acres) Conceptual Cottage (4-plex) Elevation Conceptual Cottage (4-plex) Elevation Conceptual Cottage (4-plex) Elevation Cottage Elevations (under construction in Phase 1) Cottage Elevations (under construction in Phase 1) Cottage Elevations (under construction in Phase 1) ZA07-098 “R-PUD” Site Data Gross Acreage: 30.1 acres Net Acreage: ±28.2 acres Number of Lots: 62 lots - 54 single family (detached) - 6 open space - 2 private street Open Space: 9.52 acres (32%) Gross Density: 1.79 du/acre Net Density: 1.91 du/acre Avg. Lot Size: 0.38 acres (16,600 sq. ft.) Concept Plan Area of “R-PUD” zoning Concept Plan Area of “R-PUD” zoning Requesting variance to street frontage requirement. The applicant is requesting that all lots front on a common access easement (private street) Conceptual Single Family Detached Elevation Conceptual Single Family Detached Elevations Preliminary Plat View from Southlake Boulevard View from Southlake Boulevard View from Lakeside Presbyterian View from Lakeside Presbyterian View from Union Church View of Union Church at the Watermere Site View of Union Church at the Watermere Site View of Union Church at the Watermere Site View of Union Church at the Watermere Site Public Works Presentation Preliminary Utility Plan Preliminary Drainage Plan Questions? ZA07-097 & ZA07-098 (SP-2) Item 7A ZA06-160 OWNER/ APPLICANT: K. Wayne Lee REQUEST: Approval of first reading for a zoning change and site plan from "AG" Agricultural District and "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District to "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District with "O-1" Office District Uses. LOCATION: The property is located at 3220 W Southlake Boulevard. S. Pearson Lane W. Southlake Blvd View looking south towards property W. Southlake Blvd Pearson Lane View looking west towards property Primrose Lane Item 7A ZA06-160 The “S-P-1” zoning proposes to comply with the “O-1” Office District permitted uses and development regulations with the following exceptions: Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than twenty three (23) feet. Maximum Impervious Coverage: The maximum impervious coverage shall not exceed eighty-three (83%) percent of the total lot area as it currently exists. Bufferyards shall not be required due to existing site conditions. Building shall be permitted to exist as currently constructed, but shall be permitted to be improved in accordance with the attached architectural rendering. Item 7A ZA06-160 Overall Site Data Gross/Net Acreage: 0.85 acres Number of Lots: 1 lot Building Area: 7,529 sq. ft. (general office) Parking Required: 30 spaces Parking Provided: 37 spaces Open Space: ±17% (6,275 sq. ft.) Impervious Cover: ±83% (30,637 sq. ft.) Site Plan Future Exterior Alterations Historical Photograph Existing Building Façade Existing Building Façade New Parking Area Other Photos Item 7A ZA06-160 P&Z ACTION: September 6, 2007; Approved (5-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August 31, 2007; removing architectural rendering; remove front parking spaces except handicapped spot, replace with landscaping and irrigation; move dumpster to southeast corner; accepting applicant’s willingness to plant off-site trees and shrubs along the northern 10’ boundary of Chesapeake Place adjacent to this site if agreed by homeowners. Questions? Public Works Presentation Questions? Item 7B ZA07-090 OWNER: James R. Stacy APPLICANT: Blake Architects REQUEST: Approval of first reading for a zoning change and site plan from “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District with “I-1” Light Industrial District uses to include retail furniture sales (as currently exists) and indoor entertainment uses. LOCATION: The property is located at 280 Commerce Street. View looking east toward site Site View looking north toward site Site View looking west toward site Site Item 7B ZA07-090 The “S-P-1” regulations for development propose the following: 1) “I-1” Light Industrial District uses to include retail furniture sales (as currently exists) and indoor entertainment uses, specifically being the children's’ bounce house and play care areas as depicted on the attached site plan exhibits; 2) Parking requirements as depicted on the attached site plan, as approved, which is approximately ratio of 1 space per 538 square feet for all permitted uses; Bufferyards for the majority of the north, west and south property lines shall not be required due to existing pavement. Plantings are proposed in accordance with the attached landscape plan. Impervious coverage to be permitted as currently exists (90%) Item 7B ZA06-189 Site Data Gross/Net Acreage: 4.15 acres Number of Buildings: 1 commercial industrial building Square Footage: 79,703 square feet Parking Required: 154 spaces (1 space per 538 sq. ft.) Parking Provided: 154 spaces Open Space: 17,803 square feet (10%) Impervious Cover: 163,023 square feet (90%) Site Plan - Parking spaces to be removed Building Elevations Landscape Plan Floor Plan – 1st Floor Floor Plan – 2nd Floor Business located in Valencia, California Gymnastics Dance Item 7B ZA07-090 P&Z ACTION: September 6, 2007; Approved (4-0) removing 10 parking spaces as shown on mark up. Questions? Public Works Presentation Gas & Oil Well Drilling CP 07-005 (Discussion Only) Ordinance 480-RRR (1st Reading) Ordinance 880-A (1st Reading) Background City adopted zoning and city code ordinance amendments in October of 2004 (Based on the Ft. Worth Model) to address oil and gas drilling that included SUP requirement Gas well permit required to meet the technical standards Road Repair Agreement Basis for the Revisions Provide a framework through the City’s Comprehensive Plan to evaluate SUP requests. Provide reasonable access to mineral resources while minimizing impact on adjacent land uses and environmental resources. Current Process Zoning Ordinance Amendment 480-YY Amended the SUP section to allow operations in the I-2 district & provide specific regulations for operations. City Code Amendment Addresses technical operations and maintenance standards such as emergency processes, security, environmental protection, insurance, requirements, etc. Proposed Changes Amendment to the Land Use Plan to establish “A policy on natural resource protection” and site design standards for Gas Drilling and Production sites as appendices to the plan Amendment to the city’s Zoning Ordinance Amendment to the City Code Comprehensive Plan Approach to Oil & Gas Drilling Southlake 2025 Plan Provides rational nexus for the following: Location Operation Permit Issuance. Specific Use Permit (All non-residential districts) Evaluation Criteria Oil & Gas Ordinance/ Road Repair Agreement Permit Land Use Plan Amendment Establishes overarching policies on natural resource extraction within the framework of the city’s Comprehensive Plan (Appendix C) Establishes site design standards for drilling and production pad sites (Appendix C-1) Land Use Plan Amendment Street or Highway Access Minimize impacts on surrounding properties Minimize impact on natural features (Environmental Resources Map) Demonstrate coordination between the surface owner and mineral estate owner. Reclamation Techniques Site Design Standards (Appendix C-1) Standards for “High Visibility” and “Low Visibility” Sites with respect to fencing and landscaping Standards to be met during drilling and during production Hardscape Fencing & Gates Landscaping Color Access driveways Fencing and Landscaping High Visibility Sites Adjacent to and visible from major roadways, existing commercial and residential development Have availability of water for irrigation purposes Masonry or a combination of masonry and wrought iron Low Visibility Sites (8’ articulated masonry wall with gate) Not adjacent to existing development Limited availability of water for irrigation purposes Ordinance 480-RRR Gas Drilling & Production allowed in all Non-Residential Zoning Districts with a Specific Use Permit (SUP) Additional submittal requirements include: Indicate all existing and future easements Pooled area Demonstrate compliance with the Natural Resource Extraction Policy in the land use plan (Appendix C) Compliance with fencing and site design standards in Appendix C-1 of the Land Use Plan 480-RRR P&Z ACTION: September 6, 2007; Approved (6-0) subject to a minimum 600’ distance from all structures; permitted in all zoning districts; provide more information/recommendations regarding distance criteria. Ordinance 880-A Revisions Application Fee ($15,000 – Gas & Oil Permit); ($5,000 for SUP); and ($7,500 balance); Residential Distance Setback (Currently 600’-Propose 1,000’); Public Building Distance Setback (Currently 1,000’-Propose 1,500’); 8’ Masonry Wall consistent with the conditions of the SUP; Noise – Determine pre-drilling ambient level; Prohibiting combustion engines; Type of system (Closed loop); Pipeline location (New construction, mapping); Questions? Current Ordinance Potential Area Available = 576 acres (approx.) Option 1 Potential Area Available = 176 acres (approx.) Option 2 Potential Area Available = 131 acres (approx.) Seek Advice from the Attorney Regarding Possible Updates to the Oil & Gas Regulations Oil & Gas Drilling Ordinance At the June 6, 2007 City Council meeting staff presented responses to Mayor Pro Tem Carolyn Morris questions and presented the distance requirement analysis. Technical Questions Oil and gas production lines can not exceed 100 psi and be buried 6’ depth. No open flow testing is allowed. All well lines must be equipped with high/low pressure shut off valves. Each producing well must be equipped with a down hole shut-off valve storm choke. Other Questions Continue to require access to wells and drill sites must be from state or federal highways? Continue to require I-2 zoning? Increase distance requirements to a 1,000 ft. for residential and 1,500 ft. for school, church, day care and public buildings? QUESTIONS Background City Council requested that staff evaluate possible changes to the gas & oil drilling ordinance presented by Mayor Pro Tem Carolyn Morris 2004- Ordinance Amendment Process Zoning Ordinance Amendment 480-YY Amended the SUP section to allow operations in the I-2 district & provide specific regulations for operations. City Code Amendment Addresses technical operations and maintenance standards such as emergency processes, security, environmental protection, insurance, requirements, etc. Comments/Questions Can the city increase the $2,000 per day fine? - State law provides a maximum penalty of $2,000 per day per violation of a city ordinance regulating public health and safety. Who issues the final permit? - SUP (PDS); Grading Permit (PDS); Road Repair Agreement (Public Works); Drainage Plan (Public Works); oil & gas permit (staff, city council, oil & gas consultant ???). Comments/Questions Continue to allow drilling only in I-2 zoning? - By restricting gas drilling to a limited area of the city increases the likelihood that a legal challenge may be levied alleging a compensable taking. ADDITIONAL SLIDES Area = 27 Acres Owner: Shamrock Logistics Current use: Ground Fuel Storage tanks Parcel 1 Back to Map Area = 14 Acres Owner: Explorer Pipeline Co. Current use: Ground Fuel Storage tanks Parcel 2 Back to Map 3 4 6 5 S.H. 26 Parcel 3 Area = 15.5 Acres Owner: Alon USA Refining, Inc. Current use: Ground Fuel Storage tanks Parcel 4 Area = 5.7 Acres Owner: Alon USA Refining, Inc. Current use: Vacant Parcel 5 Area = 1.2 Acres Owner: Explorer Pipeline Co. Current use: Storage related support Parcel 6 Area = 1.2 Acres Owner: Koch Refining Current use: Storage related support Back to Map Parcel 7 Area = 16.6 Acres Owner: Conoco Inc Current use: Vacant Parcel 8 Area = 3.4 Acres Owner: Conoco Inc. Current use: Ground fuel storage tanks 7 8 Back to Map Area = 14.6 Acres Owner: Petroleum Co of Texas. Etal. Current use: Ground Fuel Storage tanks Parcel 9 S.H. 26 Back to Map Comments/Questions Should the city increase minimum limit of $10,000,000 on liability insurance? - Coverage level comparable with other local cities. Grapevine -$10,000,000 Ft. Worth -$10,000,000 Grapevine -$10,000,000 Colleyville -$10,000,000 Trophy Club -$10,000,000 Keller -$10,000,000 Mansfield -$10,000,000 - Staff will consult with insurance industry expert. Should drill site buffers areas be increased to 1,000’ from residential or commercial building (currently 600’) and 1,500’ from school, church, hospital and day care (currently 1,000). - The ordinance can be amended but is subject to a legal challenge if it prohibits drilling entirely in the city. Oil & Gas Ordinance Options Analysis of potential areas based on the Current Ordinance 600’ from residential and commercial structures 1,000’ from public building sites (including schools, day cares, institutions) Analysis of potential areas based on Option 1: 1,000’ from residential and commercial structures 1,000’ from public building sites (including schools, day cares, institutions) Analysis of potential areas based on Option 2: 1,000’ from residential and commercial structures 1,500’ from public building sites (including schools, day cares, institutions) Current Ordinance Current Ordinance Current Ordinance Option 2 Option 2 Option 2 Comments/Questions Should the screening requirements for the production site be amended? (Permanent production site – 8’ screening made of brick, concrete, earthen berm or a combination of all three). - determined during the SUP requirement. Noise levels can not exceed 70 decibels at a point 300’ from a well site. - Recommendation is to regulate noise based on the surrounding ambient noise levels. Comments/Questions Should the requirements for surface pits be reevaluated? - Not currently allowed. Some localities reconsidering this rule to allow a fresh water frac ponds if the pond is converted into an amenity after the drilling process is completed. - Add a requirement that a closed loop mud system be used to extract and hold salt water should be incorporated into the ordinance. Comments/Questions Evaluate of other current requirements: Oil and gas production lines can not exceed 100 psi and be buried 6’ depth. No open flow testing is allowed. All well lines must be equipped with high/low pressure shut off valves. Each producing well must be equipped with a down hole shut-off valve storm choke. - The city’s gas and oil consultant is reviewing the requirements to determine if they need to be revised to meet current safety standards. Continue to require access to wells and drill sites must be from state or federal highways. - This restriction may give rise to a taking claim QUESTIONS Item 9A SP07-275 APPLICANT: Victory Awning on behalf of Michael Anthony’s LOCATION: 2750 East Southlake Boulevard, Suite 140 REQUEST: Variance to the Gateway Plaza Phase II (Wyndham Plaza) Conditional Sign Permit for attached signs. The applicant is proposing to add an awning with attached lettering on 3 sides. Site Exhibit Proposed Awning Proposed Awning Initials on front Logo = 18 inches Area = 3.5 sq.ft. “Steaks, Chops and Seafood” on both sides Text = 6 inches Area = 2.8 sq.ft. (per side) Awning will be black - All lettering will be white Existing Sign 24 inch letters (max. allowed = 30 inches) Area = 36 sq.ft. (max. allowed = 45 sq.ft.) Awning Details – Front View Awning will be black with white lettering (Logo = 18 inches; 3.5 sq.ft.) Awning Details – Side View Awning will be black with white lettering (Text = 6 inches; 2.8 sq.ft. per side) Awning Details – Overhead View New Exhibit – 8 Foot Awning Without Text Applicant is requesting text on sides: “Steaks, Chops & Seafood” in 6 inch letters New Exhibit – 8 Foot Awning With Curtains Applicant is requesting text on sides: “Steaks, Chops & Seafood” in 6 inch letters New Exhibit – 3 Foot Awning With Curtains Applicant is requesting text on sides: “Steaks, Chops & Seafood” in 6 inch letters Current View 24 inch letters Current View Adjacent Signs 18 inches 25 inches 30 inches Adjacent Signs 30 inches 30 inches 9.5 inch letters; 28 inch logo Item 9A SP07-275 QUESTIONS? Item 9B SP07-290 APPLICANT: Powell Texas Properties, LLC for Noble Roman’s Pizza and Tuscano’s Subs LOCATION: 250 Randol Mill Avenue, Suite 140 REQUEST: Variance from the Jellico Square Conditional Sign Permit regulations for attached signs. Divide existing sign into two signs and move the two signs to lower areas of the storefront. Add a new sign with white letters where the existing sign is located. Keep neon window signs in place until the new sign with white letters is on the building. Site Plan Sprouts Little Gym Noble Roman’s Pizza and Tuscano’s Subs Existing Signage – View from Parking Lot Request to divide existing sign into 2 signs and move them to lower areas of the storefront 11 inch letters Area = 13.4 s.f. 20.625 inch letters Area = 11.5 s.f. 22.75 inch letters Area = 31.1 s.f. Requested sign width = 18 feet Allowed width = 16.5 feet Proposed Signage Façade width = 22 feet 16.5 feet (approximate) Sign Details – New Proposed Sign Sign Details – Existing Signs (to be moved to lower area of storefront) Window Signs (To Be Removed Upon Installation of New Sign) Existing Signage – View from Randol Mill near F.M. 1709 Existing Signage – View from Sidewalk along Randol Mill *Estimated area based on maximum letter height of 30 inches. Comparison of Requested Signs and Adjacent Signs Adjacent Signs 18 inch letters Applicant has not submitted revised drawings and a permit has not been issued. Sign variance was granted with a 30 inch “g” Approximate Sign Area The Little Gym Adjacent Signs 60 inches 14 inches 14 inches Adjacent Signs 24 inch letters/logo Monument Signs Monument Signs Monument Signs View from Across Southlake Boulevard QUESTIONS?