FINAL AgendaREGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 16, 2007
LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, Texas
Council Chambers in Town Hall
WORK SESSION: 5:00 to 6:00 p.m.
1. Call to order.
2. Invocation: Coy Quesenbury, Lonesome Dove Baptist Church
3. Sanitation services presentation (Tim Powell, General Manager, Allied Waste Services).
4. Smoking Ordinance.
5. Discuss all items on tonight’s meeting agenda. No action will be taken and each item will be considered during the Regular Session.
REGULAR SESSION: 6:00 p.m. or immediately following the work session.
1. Call to Order.
2A. Executive Session.
2B. Reconvene: Action necessary on items discussed in Executive Session.
3A. Mayor’s Report
3B. City Manager’s Report
1. Presentation of the Midwest TxAPA Award for Project of the Year for the Tree Preservation Ordinance.
3C. School District Report
3D. Financial Report
CONSENT AGENDA:
4A. Approve the minutes from the January 2, 2007, regular City Council meeting.
4B. Reject all bids for the Noble Oaks Park pond improvement project.
4C. Authorize a Professional Services Agreement with Lewis McLain related to updating impact fees.
4D. Authorize a Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., to prepare the Roadway Impact Fee Study Update.
4E. Authorize a Cooperative Purchasing Interlocal Agreement with the City of Fort Worth.
4F. Authorize a one-year contract for preventative maintenance on-site services for vehicles and light trucks to Mechanic’s Fleet Services, Inc., in the amount of $69,740.
4G. Authorize a Tree Mitigation Agreement for Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Miracle Pointe.
4H. Authorize a Tree Mitigation Agreement for Lots 1, 6, 7 and 8, Block 1, and Lots 1 and 5, Block 2, Miracle Pointe.
4I. Authorize a Tree Mitigation Agreement for Johnson Place.
4J. Authorize a Professional Services Agreement with Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P., for audit services.
4K. Ordinance No. 480-511, 1st Reading, (ZA06-125), Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Tract 2C2, A.H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 299, at 1090 Primrose Ln. Current Zoning: AG. Requested
Zoning: SF-20A. SPIN #5. (This item was withdrawn by the applicant.)
REGULAR AGENDA:
Public Forum.
5A. Presentation by Frank Barrows related to drainage concerns.
6A. Ordinance No. 902, 2nd Reading, Appointing an Alternate Municipal Judge and authorizing execution of an agreement with the Alternate Municipal Judge and providing an effective date.
6B. Ordinance No. 480-509, 2nd Reading (ZA06-131), Zoning Change and Development Plan for proposed Estancia at Southlake at 579 N. Kimball Ave. Current Zoning: AG. Requested Zoning:
R-PUD. SPIN #6. PUBLIC HEARING
6C. Ordinance No. 480-510, 2nd Reading (ZA06-042), Zoning Change and Development Plan for 3280 Burney Ln., being Tract 11, R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207. Current Zoning: AG.
Requested Zoning: SF-1A. Amended Zoning Change request: R-PUD with SF-1A uses and regulations. SPIN #3. PUBLIC HEARING
6D. Resolution No. 07-003, (ZA06-152), Specific Use Permit for a telecommunications antenna at 3700 N. White Chapel Blvd. Current Zoning: CS. SPIN #1. PUBLIC HEARING
6E. Resolution No. 07-004, (ZA06-183), Specific Use Permit for a tent at Kroger at 2110 E. Southlake Blvd. Current Zoning: C-3. SPIN #8. PUBLIC HEARING
6F. Ordinance No. 897, 2nd Reading, Amending Ch. 18, Sect. 18-79 of the Southlake City Code establishing a new speed limit on a portion of N. Carroll Ave. and on 2 portions of Kimball
Ave. PUBLIC HEARING
There are no items on this agenda.
8. There are no items on this agenda.
9A. ZA06-143, Preliminary Plat for Wimbledon Estates (f.k.a. Preston Oaks), at 1331 Sunshine Ln. and 1778 E. Highland St. Current Zoning: SF-1A. SPIN #5.
9B. Consider SP06-401A, Variance to the Conditional Sign Permit for Jellico Square at the northwest corner of W. Southlake Blvd. and Randol Mill Ave.
9C. Consider SP07-002, Variance to the Conditional Sign Permit for Shops at Southlake, Starpower, at the southeast corner of E. Southlake Blvd. and S. Carroll Ave.
9D. Consider any action necessary regarding Request for Bid #609A161PS600207 related to branding Southlake.
There are no items on this agenda.
11. Meeting adjourned.
Item 4B:
Reject all bids for the Noble Oaks Pond Improvements project
Design previously approved by City Council, as recommended by Parks Board and SPDC
Proposed improvements to include:
water well
Pond excavation, re-shaping, and erosion control
spillway and storm drain improvements
Domestic water line and electrical upgrades
Also recommended as bid alternate items:
installation of a gazebo
landscape improvements
Original cost estimates provided by the project engineer for the base bid items – approx $100,000.
Project bids opened December 19, 2007:
Fryer Construction Co. $251,000.00
Quality Excavation, LTD. $271,858.50
Both bids far exceeded the available funds for the project ($100,000).
Review of bids indicate the increase is a result of the proposed well and pump (average of 73% of base bids).
As a matter of procedure, recommend all bids be rejected.
Next Steps:
Staff working with engineer to restructure the bid documents
Separate or remove well from the pond improvements.
The timing for drilling a water well is not favorable given the recent drought conditions and tremendous gas exploration within the Barnett Shale.
Explore domestic tap.
Re-bid in upcoming weeks
move forward with improvements.
Parks and Recreation Board recommended rejection of all bids at January 8, 2007 meeting (8-0).
Staff is available for questions and seeks Council consideration.
Item 4C
Impact fee update required every 5 years:
Water Impact Fee
Wastewater Impact Fee
Roadway Impact Fee
McLain Services Agreement
McLain Services Agreement
McLain services will include:
Financial analysis of all fees
Determination of max fees
Consultation throughout the process
Estimated fees of $15,000 – $22,500
Funded through existing impact fees
Staff recommends approval of the agreement
Contact Director Last with any questions
McLain Services Agreement
Item 4D
Impact fee update required every 5 years:
Water Impact Fee
Wastewater Impact Fee
Roadway Impact Fee
Kimley-Horn Services Agreement
Kimley-Horn Services Agreement
Kimley Horn and Associates services will include:
Prepare Roadway Impact Fee update
Develop Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan
Develop Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Calculation
Basic fee $33,000
Additional Services Fee $ 7,500
Funded through existing impact fees
Questions?
Contact Bob Price at (817) 748-8097
Kimley-Horn and Associates Impact Fee Update Agreement
ITEM 4E
AUTHORIZE A
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
FORT WORTH
Considerations for entering into Agreement
Section 271.102 of the Local Government Code authorizes the entering into Interlocal Agreements between Municipalities.
Provides another avenue for meeting State bidding requirements.
Reduced pricing for purchasing goods and services by utilizing a much larger purchasing volume than the City of Southlake could generate alone.
Considerations Continued
Agreement allows the City of Southlake to purchase from existing and future contracts between City of Fort Worth and their vendors.
Establishes valued pricing.
Effectively utilizes employees time.
Agreement has been reviewed by City Attorney.
Considerations Continued
Based on September 25, 2006 pricing:
$0.12 per gallon difference for unleaded fuel between City’s current supplier and City of Fort Worth fuel contract
Potential savings for FY2006 would have been $23,661.68 Vendor trained staff inspecting vehicles
Questions?
Please contact
Sharen Jackson
Director of Finance
817-748-8042
ITEM 4F Award a one year contract for on-site Preventative Maintenance Fleet Services for Vehicles and Light Trucks to Mechanic’s Fleet Services, Inc. in the amount $69,740
Proposed On-Site PM Services “Benefits”
Reduced out of service time for City vehicles.
PM will be performed during vehicle non-use hours
Increase of productive employee labor hours available for providing City services.
City employees will not shuttle vehicles for required PM services
PM services performed at required times
Vehicles will receive PM services when due
Fewer unexpected breakdowns
Repair issues will be identified sooner
Proposed On-Site PM Services “Benefits” Continued
Having properly trained personnel inspecting vehicles for proper operation
Vendor trained staff inspecting vehicles
Provide for safer vehicles on City streets
Vehicles maintained in top operating condition
Extended vehicle service life and lower long term costs.
Vehicle life will be extended and overall long term costs will be reduced with proper care and timely maintenance
Lower labor rate charged for normal repairs.
$54.00 per hour verses $75-$95 current rate for vehicle repairs
QUESTIONS?
Please contact
Sharen Jackson
Director of Finance
817-748-8042
Items 4 G, H, & I
Authorizing the Mayor to approve Tree Mitigation Agreements with:
Berwyn Custom Homes for Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Miracle Pointe;
Miracle Pointe Development Corporation for Lots 1, 6, 7, & 8, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 5, Block 2, Miracle Pointe; and
MDC-Johnson Place Estates, LTD. for Johnson Place.
Tree Preservation Ordinance Enforcement Action
The city’s Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B requires a tree permit to alter all protected trees.
In November 2006, 3 separate incidences of violations to the Tree Preservation Ordinance were observed.
Based on the requirements of the Ordinance 585-B, the respective applicants are proposing to mitigate all altered trees based on the caliper inches removed.
Contents of the Tree Mitigation Agreements
A form agreement was drafted by the City Attorney’s office based on the ordinance requirements.
Each agreement includes an exhibit (Exhibit A) showing the trees altered in violation of a tree permit and an exhibit (Exhibit B) showing type, location, and number of trees to be replanted.
Agreements are included in the Council packets.
1. TMA with Berwyn Custom Homes for Lot 5, Block 1, Miracle Pointe
Exhibit A – Trees Removed
TMA with Berwyn Custom Homes for Lots 5 & 6, Block 1, Miracle Pointe
Exhibit B – Required Replacement Trees
Lot 5, Block 1
Lot 6, Block 1
2. TMA with Miracle Pointe Development Corporation
Exhibit A – Trees Removed
TMA with Miracle Pointe Development Corporation
Exhibit B – Required Replacement Trees
All tree planting locations must be approved by the Landscape Administrator/ Administrative Official.
All replacement trees must meet the diameter, height, and species requirements of the Ordinance and shall be a minimum of 4” caliper trees limited to the following:
Live oaks
Red oaks
Bur oaks
Chinese pistachio
The replanting shall be as follows (see attached plat for the subject lots):
Three (3) live oak trees on lot 1, block 1
Five (5) trees (3 live oaks and 2 red oaks) on lot 1, block 2
Two (2) trees (1 chinese pistachio and 1 red oak) on lot 5, block 2
Five (5) live oaks trees on lot 8, block 1
Two (2) live oak trees on lot 7, block 1
The credit for the remainder 24” required shall only be granted by designating the existing 24” oak tree on lot 5, block 2 as a preserved tree and subject to the all the conditions of
a protected tree under Ordinance 585-B. Any alteration of this tree shall be subject to mitigation per Ordinance 585-B. Any building pads on this site shall be located in such a manner
as to minimize the impact on its critical root zone.
No replacement trees shall be planted in any easements.
3. TMA with MDC-Johnson Place Estates, LTD. for Johnson Place.
Exhibit A –
Trees Removed (Area 1)
Exhibit A – Trees Removed (Area 2)
Exhibit A – Trees Removed (Area 3)
Area of tree removal
Exhibit A – Trees Removed (Area 4)
Exhibit B – Trees Mitigation – Key Map
Area A
Area B
Area C
Area D
Exhibit B – Trees Mitigation – Area A
Exhibit B – Trees Mitigation – Area B
Exhibit B – Trees Mitigation – Area C
Exhibit B – Trees Mitigation – Area D
Exhibit B – Trees Mitigation – Overall Plan
Questions/Comments?
Item 4J Authorize a professional services agreement with Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P., for audit services.
Contract provisions
City Charter requires the City at the close of each fiscal year have an independent audit performed by a Certified Public Accountant;
Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P. is the city’s auditor;
Contract provisions
The objective of the audit is the expression of an opinion as to whether the financial statements are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with GAAP-generally accepted
accounting principles;
Weaver and Tidwell will also provide a report on internal control related to the financial statements and compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant
agreements;
Contract provisions
The total amount is not to exceed $68,000;
QUESTIONS?
Contact Sharen Jackson
817.748.8042
Item 6B ZA06-131
OWNER : Earnest E. Taylor, Jr.
APPLICANT: Tejas Capital Partners
REQUEST: Approval of 2nd reading for a Zoning Change and Development Plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District on property being approximately
7.97 acres.
LOCATION: The property is located at 579 N. Kimball Ave.
View looking north at property
N Kimball Ave
View looking east at property
N Kimball Ave
View looking west at property
N Kimball Ave
ZA06-131
“R-PUD” Regulations:
This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the “SF-20A” Single Family Residential Zoning District and the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the following
exceptions:
Lot Area: 11,000 square feet.
Front Yard: 25 feet.
Side Yard: 10 feet.
Side Yard Adjacent to a Street: 20 feet.
Rear Yard: 25 feet.
Lot Width: 70 feet measured at front building line.
Lot Depth: 120 feet
Minimum 4-foot sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the street except where open space lots front the street in which case the ‘internal trail’ location will be required.
Street ROW width of 40 feet with 30 feet wide street section back of curb to back of curb.
ZA06-131
Site Data
Gross Acreage: 7.97 acres
Net Acreage: 6.75 acres
Area of R.O.W.: 1.21 acres
Number of Lots: 13 single-family residential lots
3 common area lots
Open Space: 2.76 acres (34.6%)
Gross Density: 1.63 DU/Acre
Net Density: 1.92 DU/Acre
Average Lot Size: 0.28 acres (12,376 square feet)
Previously Considered Development Plan
Revised Development Plan
Lot 6 Retaining Wall Details
Grading Plan for Lot 6, Block 2
Development Plan with Aerial
Proposed Erosion Control
Fencing Details
Development Features
Development Features
Proposed Tree Conservation Analysis
Item 6B ZA06-131
P&Z ACTION: November 9, 2006; Approved (4-1) subject to review; regulations proposed; and, the applicant’s willingness to add a well in order to add water to the pond.
Representative residential images
Representative residential images
Representative residential images
Representative residential images
City Council Action on 1st Reading
City Council Action on 2nd Reading
Questions?
Public Works Presentation
Preliminary Drainage Plan
Questions?
Item 6C ZA06-042
OWNER/
APPLICANT: Jerry Statham
REQUEST: Approval of 2nd Reading for a Zoning Change and Development Plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District. The plan proposes
two (2) single family residential lots on approximately 4.03 acres.
LOCATION: The property is located at 3280 Burney Lane.
View looking west at property
ZA06-042
Site Data
Gross/Net Acreage: 4.03 acres
Number of Lots: 2 single-family residential lots
Open Space: 0.93 acres (23.1%)
Gross/Net Density: 0.50 DU/Acre
Average Lot Size: 2.015 acres (87,773 square feet)
City Council Action on 1st Reading
Staff Recommendation on Trail Easement
A survey will need to be prepared to make a definitive determination as to whether the cave is on public or private property.
The City’s Master Pathways Plan does not call for any trails in this area.
Easements through a minimum of two additional tracts of land will be required to connect the easement to the nearest public right-of-way.
There are topography challenges that must be considered in accessing the trails within the Corp of Engineers’ property.
Currently there are no designated parking areas near the trail head.
If an easement is provided on this site, staff would recommend it be placed along the south boundary of the subject property, a minimum of 10 feet in width.
Evaluation of pedestrian access to cave
ZA06-042 – Revised PUD Regulations
Proposed Concept Plan
Proposed Concept Plan with Topography
572’ Elevation
Lot Boundaries
Open Space/Preservation Area
Building Envelope
Tree Preservation Area
(with exception of pad sites,
drives, and septic fields)
Tree Conservation Analysis
Item 6C ZA06-042
P&Z ACTION: December 7, 2006; vote tied 3 to 3
Peebles, Springer, Wang – to deny
Morin, Faglie, Hudson – to approve
Application moves forward to Council with a tie vote. No super majority rule imposed with this action.
City Council Action on 1st Reading
Questions?
Public Works Presentation
8” Waterline along Burney Lane
No Sewer in the vicinity
Questions?
Item 6D ZA06-152
OWNER: MCI Telecommunications
APPLICANT: MediaFLO USA
REQUEST: Approval of a specific use permit for a telecommunications antenna and equipment cabinet. The purpose of the request is to add one (1) UHF broadcast antenna and a generator
and utility rack on the ground within the tower compound.
LOCATION: The property is located at 3700 N. White Chapel Boulevard.
N. White Chapel Blvd
Bob Jones Park
Clariden Ranch
Site
Propagation Map – Without Antenna
Site
Propagation Map – With Antenna
Site Plan
Site Plan
Site Plan
*No more than 3 separate equipment buildings/cabinets are permitted on a single lot. The applicant is proposing to increase an existing equipment shelter at the facility
*The applicant is proposing that the existing plantings be permitted
8’ masonry wall shown as required with previous SUP request.
Site Plan
Existing Shelter
Proposed equipment expansion
Existing Shelter
Proposed equipment
expansion
Site Plan
Elevations
Elevations
City Council approved a similar SUP request for this site at their last meeting and the following conditions were placed on the approval:
Required an 8' masonry wall comparable to the City Miron Water Tower site
Maintain existing landscaping around the masonry wall
Add 8'-10' red cedars (6-8 in number) on both sides of the access driveway into the site
Irrigate the turf along the access driveway
Establish a maintenance schedule of once a week in summer
Replace any dead vegetation on an on-going basis
Item 6D ZA06-152
P&Z ACTION: January 4, 2007; Approved (7-0) subject to review as presented.
Questions?
Item 6E ZA06-183
OWNER/
APPLICANT: Bruce Burleson, Kroger Food Stores
REQUEST: Approval of a specific use permit for a tent sale and associated signage.
LOCATION: The property is located at 2110 E. Southlake Blvd. in Village Center.
E. Southlake Blvd
Village Center Dr.
State Highway 114
Kroger
Area of Tent Sale
Tent Location
Tent will be 20 ft. by 30 ft. and will be completely white (no stripes)
Banner will be attached to the outside of the tent and measures approximately 12 ft. by 3 ft.
Proposed Tent
Representative Banner
Representative Pallet Sign
Sign will be draped over a pallet outside the tent.
Sign measures approximately 8 ft. by 4 ft.
Three ground signs will be displayed immediately outside the tent.
Signs measure 2 ft. by 2 ft.
Representative Ground Signs
Item 6E ZA06-183
P&Z ACTION: January 4, 2007; Approved (6-1) as presented.
Questions?
Item 6F
Ordinance No. 897
Amend Chapter 18, Section 18-79 of Code of Ordinances establishing new speed limits on portions of Kimball Avenue
Speed Limit Revisions
March, 2006 – Lee Engineering hired
to conduct vehicular speed analysis
Recommendations presented reflect findings of analysis.
Speed Limit Revisions Existing Conditions
Kimball Avenue
SH 114 Frontage Road to SH 26 – 4 lane divided – 30 mph
Speed Limit Revisions Recommendations
Kimball Avenue –
Crooked Lane (S) to City limits - 40 mph
Crooked Lane (N) to SH 114 - 35 mph
Traffic Signals?
Traffic Signal Warrant Studies
Kimball @ Continental Blvd.
Kimball @ Crooked Lane
Neither intersection met Traffic Signal warrants.
Speed Limit Exhibit
35 MPH 40 MPH
Questions?
Item 9A ZA06-143
OWNER\
APPLICANT: Preston Oaks L.P.
REQUEST: Approval of a preliminary plat proposing 18 single family residential lots on approximately 19.87 acres.
LOCATION: The property is located at 1331 Sunshine Ln. & 1778 E. Highland St.
E. Highland St.
Sunshine Ln
Villas Del Sol
Stanhope Ct
View looking west at property
E. Highland St.
Sunshine Ln
Villas Del Sol
Stanhope Ct
ZA06-143
Site Data – Preliminary Plat
Gross Land Area: 19.87 Acres
Net Land Area: 18.05 Acres
Area of R.O.W.: 1.82 Acres
Number of Lots: 18 single family residential lots
Gross Density: 0.91 du/acre
Net Density: 1.00 du/acre
Average Lot Size: 43,680 sq.ft. (1.00 Acre)
ZA06-143
Variance
Cul-de-sac Length & Street Access – The applicant requests relief from staff’s recommendation to provide an additional point of street access onto E. Highland Street at the southern
boundary of the site.
Preliminary Plat
Tree Conservation Plan
Variance Request Exhibit
Item 9A ZA06-143
P&Z ACTION: January 4, 2007; Approved (7-0) subject to review; specifically denying the requested variance.
Questions?
Proposed Subdivision Wall – Sunshine Lane
Proposed Subdivision Wall – Sunshine Lane
Proposed Landscaping
Public Works Presentation
Serviced by 6” waterline in E. Highland St and 8” waterline in Sunshine Ln
Sanitary sewer (8” minimum) will be extended to the south from the Reserve of Southlake subdivision.
Preliminary Utility Plan
Preliminary Drainage Plan
Questions?
Item 9B SP06-401A
APPLICANT: Chandler Signs on behalf of Armstrong Development
LOCATION: Northwest corner of West Southlake Blvd. and Randol Mill Avenue
REQUEST: Amendment to the Conditional Sign Permit for Jellico Square (FKA Town Lake Crossing) with regard to monument signs
Location Map
Site Plan
1
2C
3B
2B
Previously Proposed Signs
These signs were approved with the following conditions:
Must meet sign ordinance 704-B (with sign cap, signs as previously proposed were 6 inches too tall)
Limited to one tenant on each sign
No white backing
Must have back lighting with individual letters
Sign 2B
Sign 2C
New Proposed Signs (2 Signs)
Aluminum Channel Letters with white L.E.D. illumination
Tenant boxes to have applied vinyl
Summary of Variances
Must meet sign ordinance 704-B
Proposed signs are 6 inches too tall (due to sign cap)
Proposed signs do comply with 704-C
Limited to 1 tenant on each sign
Applicant is proposing 4 tenants/sign
Previously Proposed Sign
Sign 3B
Approved as presented
New Proposed Sign (consistent with Council approval)
(No variances requested)
Previously Proposed Office Monument Sign
Approved, under the condition that the sign reference the office park only and not contain multi-tenant listings.
In addition, the applicant was asked to look at the orientation of the sign in relation to Randol Mill.
New Proposed Sign (consistent with Council approval)
(No variances requested)
Previously Submitted Elevations
New Elevations (consistent with Council approval)
SP06-401A
QUESTIONS?
Item 9C SP07-002
APPLICANT: Starpower Home Entertainment Systems
LOCATION: 1431 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 511
REQUEST: Variance to the Shops of Southlake Conditional Sign Permit:
Vicinity Map
Sign A
Site Plan
Sign B
Sign C
Sign D
Sign A – Northwest Elevation
26.5”
10” letters
(Permitted 18” letters and logo)
Sign A – Northwest Elevation
Signs B, C, D, and E
North, West, and East Elevations
(Permitted 18” letters and logo)
50”
18” letters
Sign B – North Elevation
Sign C – East Elevation
50”
18 inch letters
(Permitted 18” letters and logo)
50”
18”
(Permitted 18” letters and logo)
Sign D – West Elevation
Example of a store with 24 inch letters
Signs with 18 inch letters (for comparison)
Previous Submittal
Requested Logo Height: 55.5 inches
West Elevation
FM 1709
West Elevation
55.5 inch logo
North Elevation (facing FM 1709)
55.5 inch logo
36 inch logo
Applicant is permitted one sign on each façade visible from a street or internal drive.
FM 1709
East Elevation
55.5 inch logo
FM 1709
SP07-002
QUESTIONS?
Item 9D - Branding
Request for Bids generated three submittals
Northstar Destinations - $105,000
Torch Creative - $52,500
The Richards Group - $149,500
Branding
Evaluation team reviewed the proposals against the RFB
Evaluation matrix
Interviews with Richards and Northstar
Branding
Alternatives
Select a vendor from the current proposals
Reject all bids as submitted
More narrowly define scope, interview and develop agreement less than $25,000
Hold on project
Other alternatives preferred by Council?
Branding
Council discussion and direction
Branding