Item 6CItem 6C ZA07-129
OWNER: Robert Stevenson
APPLICANT: Enrichment Enterprises
REQUEST: Approval of second reading for a Zoning Change and Site Plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District with “O-1” Office District uses. The plan
proposes the development of three (3) general office buildings on a lot of approximately 2.89 acres.
LOCATION: The property is located at 310 E. Southlake Blvd.
E. Southlake Blvd
Diamond Circle Estates
Byron Nelson Pkwy
Parkwood Dr
View looking east toward property
View looking west toward property
Item 6C ZA07-129
The “S-P-1” zoning will follow the uses and regulations of the “O-1” Office District permitted uses and development regulations with the following exceptions:
All fencing and required bufferyards shall be installed (per the approved landscape/site plans) prior to the occupancy of the first building completed;
Covered parking shall be a permitted as an accessory use with the following regulations:
-15 covered parking spaces shall be permitted as shown on the site plan and elevations;
The entire 24’ driveway loop shall be constructed and meet City approval prior to occupancy of the first building completed;
Buildings on Lots 2, 3 and 4 will not exceed one story;
Item 6C ZA07-129
The “S-P-1” zoning will follow the uses and regulations of the “O-1” Office District permitted uses and development regulations with the following exceptions:
All buildings shall be stone masonry, barrel tile roof, cedar trim and shall be equal in materials and quality of construction;
The water retention feature in the southwest corner of the site shall be constructed, operational and meet City approval prior to occupancy of the first building completed;
Bufferyards shall not be required for interior lot boundaries, but shall be required as shown on the attached site plan and landscape plan;
Building setback lines/minimum yard requirements shall be in accordance with the attached site plan as presented;
Impervious lot coverage shall be as shown on the attached site plan as presented;
Up to a 10% variance on total parking requirements.
Item 6C ZA07-129
Site Data
Gross/Net Acreage: 2.89 acres
Number of Lots: 4 lots
Number of Buildings: 4 buildings
Floor Area: 28,974 sq. ft. (General Office)
Parking Required: 127 spaces
Open Space: 29% (43,541 sq. ft.)
Impervious Coverage: 61% (82,200 sq. ft.)
Previous Site Plan
Site Plan Enlargement
SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN
VARIANCES
Drive Stacking Variance
Required: 75’
Provided: ± 40’
Street Frontage
Variance
(2 lots)
Summary of Changes
The two story building has been reduced from a ±25,000 square feet building to ±12,000 square feet building and was moved to the south approximately 160 feet. Originally, the two story
portion of building was within ±110 feet of a residential property line. The new plan places the two story building ±170 feet from the nearest residential property line.
The total floor area of all buildings has been reduced from ±34,000 square feet to ±29,000 square feet.
The impervious coverage has been reduced from 65% to 61%.
The last plan presented showed total of two detached building pad sites with the eastern pad having a partial two story building. The new plan proposes four detached building pad sites
with one two story building adjacent to E. Southlake Boulevard and three one story buildings.
Covered parking is detached
BUILDING 1 ELEVATIONS
COVERED PARKING
TREE CONSERVATION PLAN
LANDSCAPE PLAN
LANDSCAPE PLAN
4” Live Oak
4” Bur Oak
NR Stevens Holly
NR Stevens Holly (cluster of 5)
Crape Myrtle
Existing tree to be preserved
To be replaced by new 8’ fence with
masonry columns / masonry infill panels
“Owner to add new cedar wood infill
to existing masonry fence”
“Owner to add new cedar wood infill
to existing masonry fence”
Item 6C ZA07-129
P&Z ACTION: December 6, 2007; Approved (7-0) subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated November 2, 2007; approving the driveway stacking variance; removing the parking spaces
as identified by the applicant; requiring a 40-foot tree well between buildings 2 & 3 as identified by the applicant; changing the windows on the building as identified by the applicant;
requiring a retention & waterfall feature in the southwest corner; requiring the use of bollard lights and security lighting on the site; requiring that the architecture for all buildings
be consistent with the first building; and requiring additional oak trees in the northeast corner.
Item 6C ZA07-129
COUNCIL ACTION: December 18, 2007; City Council to remand this item back to P&Z for consideration. The City Council approved a motion to remand this case back to the Planning and
Zoning Commission (6-0).
P&Z ACTION: January 3, 2008; Approved (6-0), subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated December 12, 2007; clarifying the applicant’s willingness to plant at least 4” caliper
canopy trees on the northeast corner of the property to assist in the buffer; construct an 8’ masonry fence on the northern boundary; refurbish the existing fencing on the east and
west sides; and, granting the requested variance for driveway stacking.
Item 6C ZA07-129
March 4, 2008; City Council approved first reading (5-0) subject to the following:
stating that the applicant will fill in all existing fences on the east and west sides with capped cedar with the owners’ approval and will maintain the fence;
requiring the applicant will install an 8’ tall panel fence on the north side;
the applicant will install the detention pond identified on the site plan in connection with the construction of building 1;
approving 12 covered parking spaces for the entire site;
future buildings must be of similar material and design as shown for building 1;
subject to the colored landscape plans as submitted this evening;
buildings 2 through 4 may not exceed one story;
requiring applicant to build the entire drive structure as shown on the site plans in connection with the construction of building 1 noting this will not include the parking contemplated
for the other buildings;
requiring applicant to work with the neighbors on the fence considerations discussed tonight prior to second reading;
requiring all perimeter landscaping to be installed in connection with the construction of building 1;
granting the driveway stacking variance outlined in the proposal; and
subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated February 27, 2008.
Questions?