Loading...
Item 6A Item 6A ZA06-131 OWNER : Earnest E. Taylor, Jr. APPLICANT: Tejas Capital Partners REQUEST: Approval of 2nd reading for a Zoning Change and Development Plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District on property being approximately 7.97 acres. LOCATION: The property is located at 579 N. Kimball Ave. View looking north at property N Kimball Ave View looking east at property N Kimball Ave View looking west at property N Kimball Ave ZA06-131 “R-PUD” Regulations: This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the “SF-20A” Single Family Residential Zoning District and the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the following exceptions: Lot Area: 11,000 square feet. Front Yard: 25 feet. Side Yard: 10 feet. Side Yard Adjacent to a Street: 20 feet. Rear Yard: 25 feet. Lot Width: 70 feet measured at front building line. Lot Depth: 120 feet Minimum 4-foot sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the street except where open space lots front the street in which case the ‘internal trail’ location will be required. Street ROW width of 40 feet with 30 feet wide street section back of curb to back of curb. ZA06-131 Site Data Gross Acreage: 7.97 acres Net Acreage: 6.75 acres Area of R.O.W.: 1.21 acres Number of Lots: 13 single-family residential lots 3 common area lots Open Space: 2.76 acres (34.6%) Gross Density: 1.63 DU/Acre Net Density: 1.92 DU/Acre Average Lot Size: 0.28 acres (12,376 square feet) Previously Considered Development Plan Revised Development Plan Lot 6 Retaining Wall Details Development Features Development Features Proposed Tree Conservation Analysis Item 6A ZA06-131 P&Z ACTION: November 9, 2006; Approved (4-1) subject to review; regulations proposed; and, the applicant’s willingness to add a well in order to add water to the pond. City Council Action on 1st Reading Item 6A ZA06-131 COUNCIL ACTION: December 5, 2006; Approved (6-1) subject to applicant’s agreement to further study the setbacks on Lot 1, Block 1, and Lot 7, Block 2, on Kimball Avenue to set back further from the improved right-of-way; requiring the applicant to provide the trail; requiring that the pond be improved with fountains and landscaping; requiring the applicant to bring back wall along the creek and any improvements along the creek area and stating that Council is not approving the gabion system; requiring the plan to be as shown on the Development Features rendering showing a median break between Lots 1 and 7 at the entrance to the development; requiring applicant to protect the trees along the backs of Lots 6 and 7, Block 1; requiring wrought iron fencing along the north and south property lines in addition to those areas already depicted; requiring applicant to review moving the stub location at the end of Estancia approximately 20 feet to the east; requiring applicant to bring back a diagram of Lot 6; and subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated November 3, 2006. Questions? Public Works Presentation Preliminary Drainage Plan Questions? Item 6B ZA06-059 OWNER: MCI Telecommunications APPLICANT: MetroPCS REQUEST: Approval of a specific use permit for a telecommunications antenna and equipment cabinet. The purpose of the request is to add three (3) cellular antennas and an equipment cabinet, battery and utility rack on the ground within the tower compound. LOCATION: The property is located at 3700 N. White Chapel Boulevard. *No more than 3 separate equipment buildings/cabinets is permitted on a single lot. The applicant is proposing to add a 7th equipment shelter at the facility *The applicant is proposing that the existing plantings and screening be permitted Proposing 8’ stockade/wood fence Item 6B ZA06-059 P&Z ACTION: December 7, 2006; Approved (6-0) subject review; granting the requested variances; noting the applicant’s willingness to erect an 8 foot masonry fence around the exterior of the compound; and, installing a metal door to match the color of the brick. Questions? Item 6C ZA06-166 OWNER: The Morrison Group APPLICANT: Adams Engineering REQUEST: Approval of a site plan for Lots 2 – 7, Morrison Office Park. LOCATION: The property is located at 2720 E. State Highway 114. View looking north at property Approved Concept Plan Site Plan Building Elevations Building Elevations Building Renderings Tree Conservation Plan Item 6C ZA06-166 P&Z ACTION: December 7, 2006; Approved (6-0) subject review. Questions? Public Works Presentation Utility Plan Drainage Plan Questions? Item 6D ZA06-173 OWNER/ APPLICANT: Carroll ISD REQUEST: Approval of a Revised Site Plan for Carroll High School. LOCATION: The property is located at 800 N. White Chapel Boulevard. Item 6D ZA06-173 P&Z ACTION: December 7, 2006; Approved (6-0) subject review. Questions? Item 7A ZA06-042 OWNER/ APPLICANT: Jerry Statham REQUEST: Approval of 1st Reading for a Zoning Change and Development Plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District. The plan proposes two (2) single family residential lots on approximately 4.03 acres. LOCATION: The property is located at 3280 Burney Lane. View looking west at property ZA06-042 ZA06-042 Site Data Gross/Net Acreage: 4.03 acres Number of Lots: 2 single-family residential lots Open Space: 0.93 acres (23.1%) Gross/Net Density: 0.50 DU/Acre Average Lot Size: 2.015 acres (87,773 square feet) Proposed Concept Plan Proposed Concept Plan with Topography 572’ Elevation Lot Boundaries Open Space/Preservation Area Building Envelope Tree Preservation Area (with exception of pad sites, drives, and septic fields) Tree Conservation Analysis Item 7A ZA06-042 P&Z ACTION: December 7, 2006; vote tied 3 to 3 Peebles, Springer, Wang – to deny Morin, Faglie, Hudson – to approve Application moves forward to Council with a tie vote. No super majority rule imposed with this action. Questions? Public Works Presentation 8” Waterline along Burney Lane No Sewer in the vicinity Questions? Item 9X SP06-512 APPLICANT: Chandler Signs on behalf of Armstrong Development LOCATION: Northwest corner of West Southlake Blvd. and Randol Mill Avenue REQUEST: Variance to the Conditional Sign Permit for Jellico Square (FKA Town Lake Crossing) with regard to monument signs Location Map Site Plan 1 2C 3B 2B Previously Proposed Signs These signs were approved with the following conditions: Must meet sign ordinance 704-B (with sign cap, signs as previously proposed were 6 inches too tall) Limited to one tenant on each sign No white backing Must have back lighting with individual letters Sign 2B Sign 2C New Proposed Signs (2 Signs) Aluminum Channel Letters with white L.E.D. illumination Tenant boxes to have applied vinyl Summary of Variances Must meet sign ordinance 704-B Proposed signs are 6 inches too tall (due to sign cap) Proposed signs do comply with 704-C Limited to 1 tenant on each sign Applicant is proposing 4 tenants/sign No white backing White backing is proposed for tenant boxes Backlighting Applicant is proposing internal L.E.D. illumination Previously Proposed Sign Sign 3B Approved as presented New Proposed Sign Previously Proposed Office Monument Sign Approved, under the condition that the sign reference the office park only and not contain multi-tenant listings. In addition, the applicant was asked to look at the orientation of the sign in relation to Randol Mill. New Proposed Sign SP06-512 QUESTIONS?