Item 6A
Item 6A ZA06-131
OWNER : Earnest E. Taylor, Jr.
APPLICANT: Tejas Capital Partners
REQUEST: Approval of 2nd reading for a Zoning Change and Development Plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District on property being approximately
7.97 acres.
LOCATION: The property is located at 579 N. Kimball Ave.
View looking north at property
N Kimball Ave
View looking east at property
N Kimball Ave
View looking west at property
N Kimball Ave
ZA06-131
“R-PUD” Regulations:
This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the “SF-20A” Single Family Residential Zoning District and the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the following
exceptions:
Lot Area: 11,000 square feet.
Front Yard: 25 feet.
Side Yard: 10 feet.
Side Yard Adjacent to a Street: 20 feet.
Rear Yard: 25 feet.
Lot Width: 70 feet measured at front building line.
Lot Depth: 120 feet
Minimum 4-foot sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the street except where open space lots front the street in which case the ‘internal trail’ location will be required.
Street ROW width of 40 feet with 30 feet wide street section back of curb to back of curb.
ZA06-131
Site Data
Gross Acreage: 7.97 acres
Net Acreage: 6.75 acres
Area of R.O.W.: 1.21 acres
Number of Lots: 13 single-family residential lots
3 common area lots
Open Space: 2.76 acres (34.6%)
Gross Density: 1.63 DU/Acre
Net Density: 1.92 DU/Acre
Average Lot Size: 0.28 acres (12,376 square feet)
Previously Considered Development Plan
Revised Development Plan
Lot 6 Retaining Wall Details
Development Features
Development Features
Proposed Tree Conservation Analysis
Item 6A ZA06-131
P&Z ACTION: November 9, 2006; Approved (4-1) subject to review; regulations proposed; and, the applicant’s willingness to add a well in order to add water to the pond.
City Council Action on 1st Reading
Item 6A ZA06-131
COUNCIL ACTION: December 5, 2006; Approved (6-1) subject to applicant’s agreement to further study the setbacks on Lot 1, Block 1, and Lot 7, Block 2, on Kimball Avenue to set back
further from the improved right-of-way; requiring the applicant to provide the trail; requiring that the pond be improved with fountains and landscaping; requiring the applicant to bring
back wall along the creek and any improvements along the creek area and stating that Council is not approving the gabion system; requiring the plan to be as shown on the Development
Features rendering showing a median break between Lots 1 and 7 at the entrance to the development; requiring applicant to protect the trees along the backs of Lots 6 and 7, Block 1;
requiring wrought iron fencing along the north and south property lines in addition to those areas already depicted; requiring applicant to review moving the stub location at the end
of Estancia approximately 20 feet to the east; requiring applicant to bring back a diagram of Lot 6; and subject to Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated November 3, 2006.
Questions?
Public Works Presentation
Preliminary Drainage Plan
Questions?
Item 6B ZA06-059
OWNER: MCI Telecommunications
APPLICANT: MetroPCS
REQUEST: Approval of a specific use permit for a telecommunications antenna and equipment cabinet. The purpose of the request is to add three (3) cellular antennas and an equipment
cabinet, battery and utility rack on the ground within the tower compound.
LOCATION: The property is located at 3700 N. White Chapel Boulevard.
*No more than 3 separate equipment buildings/cabinets is permitted on a single lot.
The applicant is proposing to add a 7th equipment shelter at the facility
*The applicant is proposing that the existing plantings and screening be permitted
Proposing 8’ stockade/wood fence
Item 6B ZA06-059
P&Z ACTION: December 7, 2006; Approved (6-0) subject review; granting the requested variances; noting the applicant’s willingness to erect an 8 foot masonry fence around the exterior
of the compound; and, installing a metal door to match the color of the brick.
Questions?
Item 6C ZA06-166
OWNER: The Morrison Group
APPLICANT: Adams Engineering
REQUEST: Approval of a site plan for Lots 2 – 7, Morrison Office Park.
LOCATION: The property is located at 2720 E. State Highway 114.
View looking north at property
Approved Concept Plan
Site Plan
Building Elevations
Building Elevations
Building Renderings
Tree Conservation Plan
Item 6C ZA06-166
P&Z ACTION: December 7, 2006; Approved (6-0) subject review.
Questions?
Public Works Presentation
Utility Plan
Drainage Plan
Questions?
Item 6D ZA06-173
OWNER/
APPLICANT: Carroll ISD
REQUEST: Approval of a Revised Site Plan for Carroll High School.
LOCATION: The property is located at 800 N. White Chapel Boulevard.
Item 6D ZA06-173
P&Z ACTION: December 7, 2006; Approved (6-0) subject review.
Questions?
Item 7A ZA06-042
OWNER/
APPLICANT: Jerry Statham
REQUEST: Approval of 1st Reading for a Zoning Change and Development Plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District. The plan proposes
two (2) single family residential lots on approximately 4.03 acres.
LOCATION: The property is located at 3280 Burney Lane.
View looking west at property
ZA06-042
ZA06-042
Site Data
Gross/Net Acreage: 4.03 acres
Number of Lots: 2 single-family residential lots
Open Space: 0.93 acres (23.1%)
Gross/Net Density: 0.50 DU/Acre
Average Lot Size: 2.015 acres (87,773 square feet)
Proposed Concept Plan
Proposed Concept Plan with Topography
572’ Elevation
Lot Boundaries
Open Space/Preservation Area
Building Envelope
Tree Preservation Area
(with exception of pad sites,
drives, and septic fields)
Tree Conservation Analysis
Item 7A ZA06-042
P&Z ACTION: December 7, 2006; vote tied 3 to 3
Peebles, Springer, Wang – to deny
Morin, Faglie, Hudson – to approve
Application moves forward to Council with a tie vote. No super majority rule imposed with this action.
Questions?
Public Works Presentation
8” Waterline along Burney Lane
No Sewer in the vicinity
Questions?
Item 9X SP06-512
APPLICANT: Chandler Signs on behalf of Armstrong Development
LOCATION: Northwest corner of West Southlake Blvd. and Randol Mill Avenue
REQUEST: Variance to the Conditional Sign Permit for Jellico Square (FKA Town Lake Crossing) with regard to monument signs
Location Map
Site Plan
1
2C
3B
2B
Previously Proposed Signs
These signs were approved with the following conditions:
Must meet sign ordinance 704-B (with sign cap, signs as previously proposed were 6 inches too tall)
Limited to one tenant on each sign
No white backing
Must have back lighting with individual letters
Sign 2B
Sign 2C
New Proposed Signs (2 Signs)
Aluminum Channel Letters with white L.E.D. illumination
Tenant boxes to have applied vinyl
Summary of Variances
Must meet sign ordinance 704-B
Proposed signs are 6 inches too tall (due to sign cap)
Proposed signs do comply with 704-C
Limited to 1 tenant on each sign
Applicant is proposing 4 tenants/sign
No white backing
White backing is proposed for tenant boxes
Backlighting
Applicant is proposing internal L.E.D. illumination
Previously Proposed Sign
Sign 3B
Approved as presented
New Proposed Sign
Previously Proposed Office Monument Sign
Approved, under the condition that the sign reference the office park only and not contain multi-tenant listings.
In addition, the applicant was asked to look at the orientation of the sign in relation to Randol Mill.
New Proposed Sign
SP06-512
QUESTIONS?