Item 4L
S T A F F R E P O R T
October 15, 2008
ZA08-093
CASE NO:
Zoning Change and Site Plan for Morrison Office Park
PROJECT:
REQUEST: On behalf of The Morrison Group, Adams Engineering is requesting approval of a
zoning change to modify the existing “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District zoning to
change the front yard setback for proposed Lot 7 and to change the maximum
permitted impervious coverage for the development. Both changes are necessitated
by the Texas Department of Transportation requiring a right turn deceleration lane and
additional right-of-way dedication on SH 114 at the entrance of Morrison Park Drive.
The requirement was not known at the time of the original zoning and plan approval.
The right-of-way dedication reduced the distance from ROW to the building and
removed land area from the boundary of the lot such that the building could no longer
meet the 50 foot front yard setback along SH 114 and the 55% maximum impervious
coverage requirement for the overall development. The only changes from the existing
regulations and uses as approved are to reduce the front yard for Lot 7 from 50 feet to
35 feet and change the maximum impervious coverage for the overall development
from 55% to 58%. This plan includes carports as a permitted accessory use and a floor
area expansion previously approved by a revised site plan and SUP for Lot 1 and there
are some minor architectural changes in the footprint of the Lot 7 building. There are
no other substantial changes. This site is subject to all previous conditions of approval
unless otherwise specifically approved by the City Council. Full site plan was approved
for Lots 1, 3-, 4 & 5 under case ZA06-166. A revised site plan must be approved for
Lots 2, 6 and 7 prior to issuance of a building permit.
The approved zoning and plan allows for the development of approximately 43,380
square feet for general office uses with approximately 12,000 square feet of that
square footage potentially used as a plumbing fixture and related furnishings
showroom for retail sales. The original plan contained approximately 6.19 acres,
reduced to approximately 5.75 acres by right-of-way dedication for TxDOT.
The uses and regulations under the “S-P-2” zoning are as follows:
“O-1” Office District uses and development regulations to include the following “C-
3” General Commercial District uses on Lot 7 only: plumbing fixture showroom and
related furnishings only; Carports as shown on the site plan and included elevation
for Lot 1 shall be permitted as an accessory use.
Front Yard Setback – Along the proposed street (Morrison Park Drive), not less
than ten (10) feet
Front Yard Setback Lot 7 Adjacent to SH114 – Not less than 35 feet
Impervious Coverage – Max. overall not to exceed 55% 58%, individual lots may
not exceed 85%
Case No.
ZA 06-031
Bufferyards – Bufferyards along interior lot lines shall not be required
Bufferyards – The west portion of the front bufferyard may be encroached by the
common access drive
Parking – 1 space per 300 square feet for Lot 7
Trash Receptacle – The trash receptacle located on Lot 2 shall be allowed in the
front yard
Trash Receptacle – A total of 3 trash receptacles shall be permitted for the
development
Architecture – The architectural style of each building within the development shall
respect the elevations provided and conveyed with the Concept Plan
Fencing – The north boundary shall maintain a 6-foot iron fence
Fencing – The ease boundary shall maintain an 8-foot superior masonry wall along
the common boundary to the residential lots of Austin Oaks (City of Grapevine)
The following variances were granted with the original approval:
Public Street R.OW. – Min. 60 ft required, 40 ft. R.O.W. is proposed
Driveway Stacking – 75 feet required, requesting 13 feet and 12.5 feet
Interior Landscaping – Requesting interior landscape requirements to be equally
distributed throughout the development
ACTION NEEDED: 1)Consider first reading approval of the proposed zoning change and site plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Link to Staff Presentation, Plans and Support Information
Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated October 3, 2008
(D)
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(G) Ordinance 480-491a
for Commission and Council Members Only
(H) Full Size Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (748-8067)
Dennis Killough (748-8072)
Case No.
ZA 06-031
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: The Morrison Group
APPLICANT: Adams Engineering
PROPERTY SITUATION: The property is located at 2720 E. State Highway 114.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 1A, situated in the S. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525
LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial and Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District
REQUESTED ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District
HISTORY: - Zoning and Concept Plan was approved August 1, 2006;
- A Site Plan was approved for Lot 1 Morrison Business Park on August 1; 2006
- A Preliminary Plat was approved for Morrison Business Park on October 17,
2006;
- A Final Plat was approved for Morrison Business Park on October 19, 2006;
- A Site Plan was approved for Lot 2-7 Morrison Business Park on January 2,
2007;
- A Revised Site Plan was approved for Lot 1 Morrison Business Park on May
1, 2007;
- A SUP was approved for Carports on Lot 1 Morrison Business Park on May 1,
2007;
TRANSPORTATION
Master Thoroughfare Plan
ASSESSMENT:
The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends State Highway 114 to have
between 300 and 500 feet of right-of-way. Adequate right-of-way exists for this
roadway.
Existing Area Road Network and Conditions
The Morrison Office Park development is proposing to use an existing driveway
on E. State Highway 114 that is shared with the Next Century Dental office to
the west. The development also proposes a street that will intersect with the
E. State Highway 114 frontage road. The applicant is proposing the street to
have a right-of-way width of 40 feet with 10-foot utility easements on either side
in lieu of the standard right-of-way width of 60 feet for commercial streets. Five
(5) lots in the development will have access onto the proposed street.
E. State Highway 114 is currently a 6-lane, restricted access thoroughfare with
3-lane frontage roads on either side.
May, 2005 traffic counts on E. State Hwy 114 frontage road (between
NW Highway Bridge & Kimball Ave)
24hr 13,54415,125
West Bound (WB) () East Bound (EB) ()
WB 7591,465
Peak A.M. () 8 – 9 a.m. Peak P.M. () 5 – 6 p.m.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA 08-093 Page 1
EB 2,0711,017
Peak A.M. () 7:15 – 8:15 Peak P.M. () 5:15 – 6:15
a.m. p.m.
May, 2005 traffic counts on E. State Hwy 114 main lanes (between FM
1709 & Kimball Ave)
24hr 30,54033,500
West Bound (WB) () East Bound (EB) ()
WB 2,2042,674
Peak A.M. () 7:45 – 8:45 Peak P.M. () 5:45 – 6:45
a.m. p.m.
EB 2,9252,492
Peak A.M. () 7:15 – 8:15 Peak P.M. () 5:15 – 6:15
a.m. p.m.
Traffic Impact
Use Sq. Ft. Vtpd* AM-IN AM-PM-IN PM-
OUT OUT
Office 43,380 478 60 8 11 54
*Vehicle Trips Per Day
**The AM/PM times represent the number of vehicle trips generated during the
peak travel times on E. State Highway 114 frontage road.
PATHWAYS MASTER
PLAN: According to the Master Pathways Plan, an 8-foot multi-use trail is planned
adjacent to the development along the E. State Highway 114 frontage road.
The trail is shown on the concept plan.
WATER & SEWER: An 8-inch water line exists along the north side of the E. State Highway 114
frontage road. An 8-inch sanitary sewer line exists at the northwest corner of
the proposed office development.
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: This development drains in several directions. Lot 1 drains to the northwest
corner of the property to an existing detention pond previously constructed at
Shady Lane. Lot 3 will drain to the north. And the eastern portion of the
property will drain to the east to a proposed detention pond at the northeast
corner of the property or directly into SH 114.
TREE PRESERVATION: The submitted tree survey does not show the proposed utility easements as
required, but a Sanitary Sewer Easement is proposed to be located within the
north section of Lot 1. This easement cuts directly through a stand of existing
trees proposed to be preserved on both the Concept Plan and Tree Survey.
The installation of a sanitary sewer within this easement would alter and
possibly kill twelve (12) existing protected “Quality” trees. If the line is installed
by trenching than at least four (4) trees at a minimum would need to be
removed. It is recommended that directional boring be utilized to install the
sanitary sewer line if the development is approved.
The submitted tree survey shows that existing trees would be removed outside
of the building pads, parking, utility and drainage easements, and fire lanes.
Any trees that are removed or altered outside of these areas will be required to
be mitigated by payment into the City of Southlake Reforestation Fund per
Section 7.3 of Ordinance 585-B.
SOUTHLAKE 2025: The following recommendations are made for the Morrison Office Park:
Case No. Attachment A
ZA 08-093 Page 2
Sidewalks are provided throughout the proposed development. However,
a connection needs to be provided between the trail along the frontage
road and the internal sidewalk system. A sidewalk is recommended on
both sides of the public road within the development. The trail along the
frontage road should be straightened.
Maximize tree preservation.
Avoid re-grading the site.
P&Z ACTION: October 9, 2008, Approved (5-0) as presented and subject to the Site Plan
Review Summary No. 1 dated October 3, 2008.
COUNCIL ACTION:
STAFF COMMENTS: The original zoning was approved subject to the following conditions:
P&Z ACTION:
May 18, 2006; Approved (5-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No.
3, dated May 12, 2006; granting the requested variances; restricting the C-3
General Commercial uses to plumbing fixture showroom and related
furnishings only; and, accepting the applicant’s willingness to comply with the
following:
No loading dock
Save trees per exhibit presented
Show the design of the retaining wall
Require boring to protect trees
Show renderings and elevations adjacent to all residential areas
Increase detaining pond capacity
Lighting plan showing where and type
8’ wood fencing with metal posts
Landscaping plan for the east side
Screen the dumpster area where visible
COUNCIL ACTION:
July 18, 2006; Approved (5-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4,
dated July 12, 2006; specifically granting the requested variances; subject to
the elevations for the dumpster and retaining wall as presented; requiring an 8-
foot masonry wall along the residential lots up to the common area; requiring a
utility stub-out to the north property; subject to the lighting plan; subject to staff
review of utility considerations as provided in the presentation; subject to the
building materials (roof tile, shutters, wrought iron) as described in the
architectural plans; and subject to the recommendations of the P&Z
Commission motion.
August 1, 2006; Approved (7-0) subject to City Council’s approval on first
reading, accepting the applicant’s agreement to place a Superior Concrete
Fence along the neighbors’ houses similar to the one at the Mira Vista
development shown in tonight’s presentation and will continue to maintain the
fence at the applicant’s cost, subject to the recommendations of the Planning
and Zoning Commission, and subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4,
dated July 12, 2006.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA 08-093 Page 3
Attached is Site Plan Review No 1 dated October 3, 2008. This site is subject
to all previous conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically approved by
the City Council.
N:\Community Development\MEMO\2006cases\06-031ZCP.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA 08-093 Page 4
Case No. Attachment B
ZA 08-093 Page 1
Applicant Letter & Development Regulations
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 2
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 3
SITE PLAN
Decel Lane & ROW
dedication Area
6 covered
spaces
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 4
Tree Survey
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 5
Landscape & Lighting Plan
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 6
Proposed Typical Lighting
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 7
Conceptual Renderings
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 8
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 9
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 10
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 11
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 12
Revised Water & Detention Exhibit
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 13
Case No. Attachment C
ZA 08-093 Page 14
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA08-093One10/03/08
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
: Zoning & Site Plan
Project Name – Morrison Office Park
APPLICANT: Adams Engineering OWNER: The Morrison Group
Ben Henry Bryce Pool
500 S. Nolen Drive 311 East Vickery
Southlake, TX 76092 Fort Worth, TX 76104
Phone: (817) 329-6990 Phone: (817) 870-2227
Fax: (817) 329-7671 Fax: (817) 877-4942
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
09/22/08 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT
DENNIS KILLOUGH (817) 748-8072.
1. The following changes are need to the development regulations:
a. Move the proposal for the carports from the variance section to the use section and list as a
permitted accessory use as described and as shown on the attached site plan and
architectural elevations. Show the carports on Lot 1.
b. Correct the regulations in the letter to match City Council’s original approval. It has not been
updated since that time.
Fire lanes must meet hose-lay coverage requirements. Fire lanes are
2. Label all proposed fire lanes.
required to be 24’ in width and a minimum interior radius of 30’.
3. Include Lot 1 in the Site Data Summary and change “Medical Office Building to “General Office
Building for Lots 1-6 and Office/Retail Showroom on lot 7. The site is not parked to accommodate
medical uses.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS
* A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans/documents and conditions of approval
is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or before acceptance of any
other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be reviewed and stamped “approved”
by the Planning Department.
* All development must comply with the City’s Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and detain all post
development run-off.
* Full site plan was approved for Lots 1, 3-, 4 & 5 under case ZA06-166. A revised site p;lan must be
approved for Lots 2, 6 and 7 prior to issuance of a building permit.
* Based on the parking calculations, no medical office uses shall be permitted in the development.
Sufficient parking must be provided per individual lot unless a written agreement is properly executed
A
and filed as outlined in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended (Sec 35.2.b).
copy of the agreement must be provided to the City prior to receiving building permits.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA 08-093 Page 1
* The proposed overall site does not exceed the maximum permitted impervious coverage area
percentage of 65% for the “O-1” Zoning District on the overall development. The impervious coverage
area percentage of the development is approximately 58%.
65
* It appears that this property lies within the LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning
Ordinance No. 479.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and
building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include
but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and
Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along S. H. 114.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA 08-093 Page 2
Surrounding Property Owners
Morrison Office Park
SPO # Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage
1.
Bonola Family Ltd Prtnshp C3 Low Density Residential, Office Commercial 1.15
2.
Bonola Family Ltd Prtnshp C3 Low Density Residential, Office Commercial 1.26
3.
Austin Oaks Homeowners Assn C1 Office Commercial 0.21
4.
168 Venture No 111 C1 Office Commercial 0.59
5.
168 Venture No 111 C3 Office Commercial 0.96
6.
Morrison Group Inc The SP2 Low Density Residential, Office Commercial 6.21
7.
J & M Partners Ltd AG Low Density Residential, Office Commercial 8.66
Case No. Attachment E
ZA 08-093 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Morrison Office Park
Notices Sent:
Seven (7)
Responses Received:
One (1)
1) Bonola Family Ltd Partnership, 2370 N. Pearson Ln., Westlake, TX
Notification
; Submitted a
Opposed To
Response Form
stating on October 7, 2008 (attached).
Case No. Attachment F
ZA 08-093 Page 1
Case No. Attachment F
ZA 08-093 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-491a
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1A,
SITUATED IN THE S. FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 525;
AND BEING 6.19 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “S-P-2” GENERALIZED SITE
PLAN DISTRICT WITH “O-1” OFFICE DISTRICT USES TO INCLUDE
LIMITED “C-3” GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES TO “S-P-
2” GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH “O-1” OFFICE
DISTRICT USES TO INCLUDE LIMITED “C-3” GENERAL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT USES, AS DEPICTED ON THE
APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE
DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS,
the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9
of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 1
WHEREAS,
the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “S-P-2” Generalized
Site Plan District with “O-1” Office District uses to include limited “C-3” General Commercial District
uses under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS,
a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages;
noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights
on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of
signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate
neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street
parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces,
and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the
promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of
the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 2
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of
those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time
their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents
the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a
necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has
been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or
tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and
therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are
needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of
Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 3
amended as shown and described below:
Being Tract 1A, situated in the S. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, and being
approximately 6.19 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A”
from “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District with “O-1” Office District uses to include
limited “C-3” General Commercial District t to “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District
with “O-1” Office District uses and limited “C-3” General Commercial District uses as
depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following specific conditions:
1.
Accepting the “O-1” Office District uses and development regulations to include the following
“C-3” General Commercial District uses on Lot 7 only:
a. restricting the C-3 General Commercial uses to plumbing fixture showroom
and related furnishings only;
b. Carports as shown on the site plan and included elevation for Lot 1 shall be permitted
as an accessory use.
Accepting the proposed development regulation allowing a front setback along the
2.
proposed street to be not less than ten (10) feet;
3. Front Yard Setback Lot 7 Adjacent to SH114 – Not less than 35 feet
4.
Accepting the proposed development regulation allowing a maximum overall impervious
55% 58%
coverage not to exceed ; however, individual lots may not exceed 85%;
5.
Accepting the proposed development regulation allowing bufferyards along interior lot lines not
be required;
6.
Accepting the proposed development regulation allowing the west portion of the front
bufferyard be encroached by the common access drive;
7.
Accepting the proposed development regulation allowing a parking ratio of 1 space per 300
square feet for Lot 7;
8.
Accepting the proposed development regulation allowing the trash receptacle located on Lot 2
to be located in the front yard;
9.
Accepting the proposed development regulation allowing a total of 3 trash receptacles to be
permitted for the development;
10.
Accepting the proposed development regulation allowing the architectural style of each
building within the development to respect the elevations provided and conveyed with the
Concept Plan;
11.
Accepting the proposed development regulation allowing the north boundary fencing to be
maintained as a 6-foot iron fence;
12. Granting the requested variance allowing a 40 foot R.O.W. width;
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 4
13. Granting the requested variance allowing driveway stacking depths of 13 feet and
12.5 feet;
14. Granting the requested variance allowing interior landscape requirements to be
equally distributed throughout the development;
15. Accepting the applicant’s willingness to comply with the following:
a. No loading dock;
b. Save trees per exhibit presented;
c. Require boring to protect trees;
d. Increase detaining pond capacity;
16. Subject to the elevations for the dumpster and retaining wall as presented;
17. Requiring an 8-foot masonry wall along the residential lots up to the common area;
18. Accepting the applicant’s agreement to place a Superior Concrete Fence along the
neighbors’ houses similar to the one at the Mira Vista development shown in tonight’s
presentation and will continue to maintain the fence at the applicant’s cost;
19. Requiring a utility stub-out to the north property;
20. Subject to the lighting plan;
21. Subject to staff review of utility considerations as provided in the presentation;
22. Subject to the building materials (roof tile, shutters, wrought iron) as described in the
architectural plans;
23. Subject to the following comments in the Concept Plan Review Summary No. 4,
dated July 12, 2006:
a. Based on the parking calculations, no medical office uses shall be permitted
in the development. Sufficient parking must be provided per individual lot
unless a written agreement is properly executed and filed as outlined in the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended (Sec 35.2.b). A copy
of the agreement must be provided to the City prior to receiving building
permits.
b. The following changes are needed regarding fire lanes:
Identify and label all proposed fire lanes. Fire lanes must meet hose-
lay coverage requirements. Fire lanes are required to be 24’ in width
and a minimum interior radius of 30’.
If a fire lane is required between lots, relocate lot lines so that the fire
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 5
lane is not split down the middle. Splitting fire lanes should be
minimized as much as possible so that maintenance responsibilities
are clearly defined.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are
not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present
conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen
congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to
avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 6
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be
declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said
tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or
not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 7
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a
public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if
this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section
3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 2008.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 2008.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 8
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 9
EXHIBIT “A”
Being Tract 1A, situated in the S. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525, being approximately 6.19
acres.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 10
EXHIBIT “B”
(Reserved for Approved S-P-2 zoning letter)
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 11
CONCEPT PLAN
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 12
Tree Survey
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 13
Landscape & Lighting Plan
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 14
Proposed Typical Lighting
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 15
Conceptual Renderings
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 16
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 17
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 18
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 19
Superior Fencing Examples – Mira Vista development
Case No. Attachment G
ZA08-093 Page 20