Item 6A
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
October 14, 2009
CASE NO: ZA09-038
PROJECT: Site Plan for 175 Miron Drive – Roof Improvements
REQUEST:
On behalf of Nalia & Shezad Malik, Lonardo Construction is requesting the approval of
a Site Plan to revise the roof of an existing building at 175 Miron Drive from a flat-type
metal roof to pitch-type standing-seam metal roof. The overall height of the building
(roof ridgeline) would increase from fourteen feet (14’) to twenty-five feet (25’) if
approved.
Staff considered this request “a change in the character of the development” within the
Residential Adjacency and thus deferred approval to the Planning & Zoning
Commission and City Council.
No variances or other site revisions are proposed with this site plan request.
ACTION NEEDED:
1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider site plan approval
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
for Commission and Council Members Only
(F) 11” X 17” Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT:
Ken Baker (817)748-8067
Clayton Comstock (817)748-8269
Case No.
ZA09-038
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER:
Nalia & Shezad Malik
APPLICANT:
Lonardo Construction
PROPERTY SITUATION:
175 Miron Drive
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 2R1, Block 1, Miron Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Office Commercial
CURRENT ZONING:
“B-1” Business Service Park
HISTORY:
The existing building was built in 1984 (Source: TAD)
The property was zoned “B-1” with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance No. 480
in 1989.
A plat for Lot 2, Block 1, Miron Addition (1.16 acres) was filed March 3, 1993
(ZA92-056).
A plat for Lot 2R1, Block 1, Miron Addition (0.604 acres) was filed November
20, 1998 (ZA97-177).
SOUTHLAKE 2025 PLAN/
STRATEGIC LINK:
Quality Development
PATHWAYS
MASTER PLAN:
There are currently no sidewalks on Miron Drive nor on Southlake Blvd in this
vicinity. Because of the limited scope of this request, the sidewalk requirement
is not considered roughly proportional by staff and is thus not required.
WATER & SEWER:
The site is currently served by a 6” sewer line in Miron Drive and an 8” water
line in Miron Drive.
P&Z ACTION:
September 17, 2009; Tabled (6-0) to October 8, 2009.
October 8, 2009; Approved (5-2), subject to Staff Report dated October 2,
2009.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The applicant is to label the type of roofing material on the plan submitted. If
proposing a standing seam metal roof, it must have a non-metallic factory
applied matte finish. Because of the limited scope of this request, no staff
review has been generated. All building materials and construction methods
must meet the currently adopted International Building Code and zoning
regulations.
N:\Community Development\MEMO\2009cases\038 - SP - 175 Miron Drive roof improvements\Staff Report\ZA09-038 P&Z 09-
17-09.doc
Case No. Attachment A
ZA09-038 Page 1
Case No. Attachment B
ZA09-038 Page 1
SITE PLAN (EXISTING CONDITIONS)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA09-038 Page 1
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
Case No. Attachment C
ZA09-038 Page 2
ROOF PLAN
Case No. Attachment C
ZA09-038 Page 3
Case No. Attachment C
ZA09-038 Page 4
Case No. Attachment C
ZA09-038 Page 5
Surrounding Property Owners
175 Miron Drive
SPO # Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Response
1. F
Miron, Gary A& Janice L C2 Office Commercial 0.539
2. NR
Malik, Nalia & Shezad B1 Office Commercial 0.633
3. NR
Ewan, David B1 Office Commercial 0.520
4. NR
Mullins & White Properties Inc B1 Office Commercial 0.770
5. NR
Wetrich Realty Lp B1 Office Commercial 0.701
6. NR
Rocky Mountain Holdings Llc SP1 Office Commercial 1.000
7. NR
March Investments Lp B1 Office Commercial 0.743
8. NR
Dallas Smsa Tower Holdings Lp B1 Office Commercial 0.982
9. NR
Southlake, City Of CS Public/Semi-Public 1.574
10. NR
Rcc Miron Office Ltd SP2 Office Commercial 4.763
11. NR
Jonanna Development Llc SP1 Office Commercial 1.104
12. NR
Bootstrap Investments Inc O1 Office Commercial 1.131
13. NR
Bootstrap Investments Inc O1 Office Commercial 1.028
14. NR
Bootstrap Investments Inc C1 Office Commercial 2.156
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent:
Ten (10)
Responses Received:
One (1) - Attached
Case No. Attachment D
ZA09-038 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Case No. Attachment E
ZA09-038 Page 1