Item 6B
Department of Planning & Development Services
S T A F F R E P O R T
April 29, 2009
CASE NO:ZA09-011
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan for Countryside White Chapel Office Park (fka
White Chapel Office Park Phase II)
REQUEST:
On behalf of Wayne Lee & Associates, Cheatham & Associates is requesting approval
of a zoning change in order to revise the existing plans associated with “S-P-1”
Detailed Site Plan District. The primary changes include the following:
1) Changes to the tree preservation plan. Several existing trees in the drainage
channel previously designated for preservation will require removal due to
necessary improvements needed in the channel.
2) Removal of a driveway connection required to the adjoining property to the
south.
3) The number of buildings is being reduced from five to four. The two previously
approved southern buildings are to be combined into a single building.
4) All buildings were previously approved as two stories and are now proposed as
single story along with a minor increase in the building footprint area. The
buildings will still appear to be two stories so there is no significant change in
the architectural elevations. The total floor area is reduced from 28,500 square
feet to 21,080 square feet.
5) The provided parking is increased from 80 spaces to 92 spaces. The previous
approval allowed a 20% reduction in the calculated required parking with no
accommodation for medical uses. This proposal requests a 15% reduction in
the calculated required parking and will allow up to approximately 12,000
square feet in medical office uses given the provided number of parking
spaces.
6) The maximum impervious coverage is being changed from 60% to 70% due to
an increase in the number of parking spaces and building coverage.
The proposed “S-P-1” zoning shall follow the “O-1” office district uses and regulations
with the following exceptions:
Side Yard - There shall be a side yard of not less than ten (10) feet.
Maximum Impervious Coverage - The maximum impervious coverage shall not
exceed seventy (70%) percent of the total “S-P-1” zoning district boundary.
Case No.
ZA09-011
Bufferyards - Bufferyards along interior lot lines shall not be required.
Parking – One space per 300 square of floor area for general, professional and/or
financial office uses and one space per 150 square feet of floor area for medical
office uses and shall allow up to a 15% reduction in the calculated required parking
Carports - Four (4) covered parking structures (carports) shall be permitted as
shown on the site plan and elevation covering a total of 23 parking spaces. The
minimum parking space shall be measured 9 feet by 18 feet.
The following variance is being requested:
Driveway Stacking - The minimum stacking depth required is 75 feet. The
applicant is requesting a minimum stacking depth of 10 feet on both driveways.
(Variance approved previous plan)
Multi-use Trail - The Pathways Master Plan recommends an 8-foot multi-use trail
along the west side of N. White Chapel Boulevard. The applicant is requesting to
escrow monies for future construction due to construction of the ultimate width of
(Variance approved
N. White Chapel Boulevard planned for the near future.
previous plan)
ACTION NEEDED: Conduct a public hearing.
1)
Consider second reading approval of the requested zoning change and
2)
site plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
(A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plans and Support Information
Site Plan Review Summary No.3 dated April 29, 2009
(D)
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(G) SPIN Meeting Report
(H) Ordinance No. 480-522a
for Commission and Council Members Only
(I) Full Size Plans ()
STAFF CONTACT:
Ken Baker (748-8067) or Dennis Killough (748-8072)
Case No.
ZA09-011
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER:
Wayne Lee & Associates
APPLICANT:
Cheatham & Associates
PROPERTY SITUATION:
201 Countryside Court
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 1, Block B, Ravenaux Village Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY:
Office Commercial
CURRENT ZONING:
“S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
REQUESTED ZONING:
“S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
HISTORY:
- Final Plat was approved for Ravenaux Addition in January 1988.
-“O-1” zoning was placed on the property with the adoption of Ordinance No.
480, in September 1989.
- City Council approved “S-P-1” zoning and site plan on June 5, 2007.
- A plat revision was approved June 5, 2007 and expired on June 6 2008.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT:
The proposed site will have two (2) accesses directly onto Countryside Court
which intersects with N. White Chapel Boulevard. A common access stub-out
had been provided by the property to the south for future access to Countryside
Court. The connection is being made with the proposed site plan.
N. White Chapel Boulevard is currently a 2-lane, undivided roadway.
Construction of the ultimate pavement section (4 Divided, 88’ ROW) is
scheduled for the fiscal year 2006/2007.
May 2008 traffic counts on N. White Chapel Blvd (between Highland Ave
and S.H. 114)
51266254
North Bound (NB) () South Bound (SB) ()
554504
Peak A.M. () 7:15 – 8:15 Peak A.M. () 8:15 – 9:15
a.m. a.m.
423694
Peak P.M. () 3:00 – 4:00 Peak P.M. () 3:15 – 4:15
p.m. p.m.
Traffic Impact
Use Sq. Ft. Vtpd* AM-IN AM-PM-IN PM-
OUT OUT
General Office 8,090 89 11 2 2 10
Medical Office 12,044 437 24 6 12 32
Total 20,134 526 35 8 14 42
Previous General 28,500 314 39 6 7 35
Office Proposal
*Vehicle Trips Per Day
**The AM/PM times represent the estimated number of vehicle trips generated
during the peak travel times on N. White Chapel Blvd.
PATHWAYS
Case No. Attachment A
ZA09-011 Page 1
MASTER PLAN:
The Pathways Master Plan recommends an 8-foot multi-use trail along the
west side of N. White Chapel Boulevard. The trail is not shown on the site
plan.
WATER & SEWER:
A 12-inch water line exists along the west side of N. White Chapel Boulevard.
An 8-inch water line exists along the north side of Countryside Court. A 9-inch
sanitary sewer line exists along the south side of Countryside Court and along
the west side of N. White Chapel Boulevard.
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS:
Drainage is to be carried to the south into an existing natural channel along the
south boundary of the property. This area is also to be designed to handle the
required detention.
TREE PRESERVATION:
The trees that are proposed to be preserved are within the eastern portion of
the drainage easement which runs along the south boundary and are primarily
pecans along with some American Elms. Although a fair number of Pecan and
Hackberry trees are to be removed, the majority of the trees that are proposed
to be removed are Eastern Red Cedars. The applicant proposes to mitigate for
21 pecan trees (91 caliper inches) being removed with a mix of 12 new live
oaks and 9 pecans totaling approximately 93 caliper inches.
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW:
A SPIN meeting was held on January 8, 2007. The report is included as
Attachment G of this report.
P&Z ACTION:
April 9, 2009; Approved (7-0) subject to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 1
dated April 3, 2009 and granted the requested variances.
COUNCIL ACTION:
April 21, 2009; Approved (5-1) subject to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 2
dated April 15, 2009 allowing the changes as specified in the staff report,
granting the requested variances and subject to receipt of a detailed mitigation
report detailing the trees in the drainage area with proper numbers.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 29, 2009. This site
is subject to all previous conditions of approval unless specifically approved
otherwise by the City Council following a recommendation by the Planning and
Zoning Commission. The current “S-P-1” zoning was approved with the
following conditions:
1) Granting the variance for driveway stacking and shared trash enclosure
subject to a joint use agreement between the property owners;
2) Requiring that construction cost for the 8’ trail be escrowed to the City of
Southlake and constructed by the City with the White Chapel
improvements
3)
Approving the stacking variance subject to the first two (2) parking spaces
on the east driveway being removed and removing three (3) parking
spaces on the west driveway, two (2) spaces on the west side and one (1)
;(The current plans comply with
space on the east side of the west driveway
this condition)
(as shown on current plans
4) Allowing the Type “A” arbor style carports only ).
5) The applicant will put in a three foot berm added to the area between
Building 4 and White Chapel Boulevard.
6) Will remove the four covered parking spaces along the east side of
Case No. Attachment A
ZA09-011 Page 1
(The current plan complies with this condition)
Building 3 .
Case No. Attachment A
ZA09-011 Page 1
Case No. Attachment B
ZA09-011 Page 1
Link to Presentation & Plans
"S-P-1" Letter
“S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
for
COUNTRYSIDE WHITE CHAPEL OFFICE PARK
This site shall comply with all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
No. 480, as amended, as it pertains to the “O-1 OFFICE DISTRICT” uses and regulations with the
following exceptions:
Development Regulations:
a. There shall be a side yard of not less than ten (10) feet.Bufferyards along the
perimeter boundary of the S-P-1 zoning district shall be in accordance with Section
42 and the attached site plan. There shall be no bufferyards required along the
interior lot boundaries of lots subdivided within the S-P-1 zoning district.
b. Maximum Impervious Coverage: The maximum impervious coverage shall not
exceed seventy (70%) percent of the entire boundary of the S-P-1 zoning district.
There shall be no maximum for individual lots subdivided within the S-P-1 zoning
district boundary.
c. Covered parking shall be allowed in the S-P-1 zoning district. The types of covered
parking allowed shall be in accordance with Section 45.11 of the Specific Use Permit
and the attached site plan with the following exceptions:
1. The minimum size of each space shall be 9’x18’.
2. Roof and column design shall be in accordance with the attached elevation plans.
d. The required parking ratio shall be calculated at 1 space per 300 square feet of floor
general, professional and/or financial office uses and one space per 150 square feet
for medical office uses and shall allow up to a 15% reduction in the calculated
required parking.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA09-011 Page 1
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
ZA09-011Three4/29/09
Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review:
Site Plan
Project Name: – Countryside White Chapel Office Park, Lot 1, Block B, Ravenaux Village
Addition
APPLICANT: ENGINEER:
Wayne Lee & Associates Cheatham & Associates
Phone: (817) 410-4015 Phone: (817) 548-0696
Fax: (817) 410-7231 Fax: (817) 265-9532
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 4/28/09 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE
PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072.
1. Provide the minimum stacking depth of 75 feet. A minimum of 10 feet is provided on both
driveways. (Variance requested)
2. Provide the 8' multi-use trail along N. White Chapel Boulevard. (Applicant requests to
escrow the construction cost to the City, as done with the previous approval)
*
A fully corrected plan that includes all associated support plans/documents and conditions
of approval is required before any ordinance or zoning verification letter publication or
before acceptance of any other associated plans for review. Plans and documents must be
reviewed and stamped “approved” by the Planning Department.
* All development must comply with the City’s Drainage Ordinance No. 605.
* The applicant proposes uses and regulations as depicted on the attached S-P-1 zoning
document and site plan.
* Buildings cannot encroach upon existing easements. A plat revision must be approved by
the City and filed of record in order to abandon the existing drainage & utility easement and
subdivide the existing lot as shown by this plan. The plat must also include the approval &
signature block for all franchise utility companies.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. All signs must comply with the
Sign Ordinance No 704-C. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of
any signs.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA09-011 Page 1
* Applicant proposes joint use of a single enclosure for all four buildings/lots. If approved in
this form, a joint use and maintenance agreement must be filed of record in the County
along with any replat to further subdivide the property.
* Although it appears that the buildings comply with articulation requirements, please insure
that all elevations are compliant with articulation requirements. The maximum wall length
permitted is 30 feet and the minimum off-set must be 1.5 feet. Check horizontal off-sets.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must
be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter
Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA09-011 Page 2
Surrounding Property Owners
Countryside White Chapel Office Park Lots 1R1-1R4
SPO # Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Response
Retail Commercial, Office Commercial,
1. NR
White Chapel Village Ctr Prt C3 Medium Density Residential 6.33
2. NR
Adelki Llc SP1 Office Commercial 0.51
3. NR
Bengtson, Scott & Michelle SP1 Office Commercial 0.39
4. NR
Parker Pearson Lp SP1 Low Density Residential, Office Commercial 0.78
5. NR
Rec Properties Ltd SP1 Low Density Residential, Office Commercial 0.43
6. NR
Ahf-White Chapel Llc SP1 Low Density Residential, Office Commercial 0.57
Retail Commercial, Office Commercial,
7. NR
White Chapel Village Ctr Prt CS Medium Density Residential 3.03
Public/Semi-Public, Retail Commercial,
8. NR
Greenway-White Chapel Lp SP2 Office Commercial 2.67
Public Park/Open Space, Low Density
Residential, Public/Semi-Public, Retail
9. NR
Countryside Bible Church SP1 Commercial, Office Commercial 13.68
10. NR
Wayne, Lee K SP1 Office Commercial 2.37
F
11.
International Ch Four Square G SP1 Low Density Residential, Office Commercial 3.78
F
12.
International Ch Foursquare Go SP2 Low Density Residential, Office Commercial 6.23
13. NR
White Chapel Village Ctr Prt C3 Retail Commercial 0.40
14. NR
White Chapel Llc AG Retail Commercial 0.90
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Case No. Attachment E
ZA09-011 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Countryside White Chapel Office Park Lots 1R1-1R4
Notices Sent:
Fourteen (14)
Responses Received:
Four (4) – Attached
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-011 Page 1
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-011 Page 1
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-011 Page 1
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-011 Page 1
Case No. Attachment F
ZA09-011 Page 1
SPIN MEETING REPORT
CASE NO.
ZA07-015
PROJECT NAME:
White Chapel Plaza Office Park, Phase II
201 Countryside Ct.
Southwest Corner of N. White Chapel Blvd and Countryside Ct.
SPIN DISTRICT:
11
MEETING DATE:
7:30PM, JANUARY 8, 2007
MEETING LOCATION:
1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
MEETING ROOM 3B
TOTAL ATTENDANCE:
Eight (8)
SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT:
Mike Terry
APPLICANT(S) PRESENT:
Bryan Tucker and K. Wayne Lee
STAFF PRESENT:
Planner Clayton Comstock
NOTE: NO RESIDENTS WERE PRESENT
STAFF CONTACT:
Clayton Comstock, (817)748-8269; ccomstock@ci.southlake.tx.us
APPLICANT PRESENTATION SUMMARY
Five buildings to be proposed – two for medical use and three for general office
Development to be laid out in a manner to avoid a city sewer lift station on N. White
Chapel Blvd. and to save a 28” Pecan tree.
Development to be of the same look and style of Phase I to the south
One dumpster to be shared between Phase I & Phase II (currently on Phase I)
Access to be from Countryside Court to the north and Phase I of the development to the
South.
QUESTIONS / CONCERNS / COMMENTS
QUESTION: Are any variances being requested?
ANSWER: Yes, for parking reduction. Parking will also be available on Countryside Ct (10
spaces) and the church property to the west.
QUESTION: What, if any signage is proposed?
ANSWER: A monument sign along N. White Chapel Blvd.
Case No. Attachment G
ZA09-011 Page
1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-522a
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR
TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK B, RAVENEAUX VILLAGE
ADDITION, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT
“A” FROM “S-P-1” WITH “O-1” DISTRICT USES DETAILED SITE PLAN
DISTRICT TO “S-P-1” WITH “O-1” DISTRICT USES DETAILED SITE PLAN
DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED
HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO
THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER
PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE
PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE
ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS,
the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the
electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local
Government Code; and,
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to
adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other
structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and
map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with
a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS,
the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS,
a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or
corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City
Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be
Case No. Attachment H
ZA09-011 Page
1
granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately
surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the
vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,
lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and
adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in
the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-
street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and
protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health
ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
facilities; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things
the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value
of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity
for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the
amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or
improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was
made; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning
lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the
health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids
undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity
and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the
conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a
Case No. Attachment H
ZA09-011 Page
2
change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective
changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best
interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general
health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas,
passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that
the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and
described below:
Being Lot 1, Block B, Ravenaux Village Addition, being approximately 2.29 acres, and more
fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District with “O-1”
Office District Uses to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District with “O-1” Office District Uses as
depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,
Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject
to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent
ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words,
phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby
ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the
comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the
community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably
Case No. Attachment H
ZA09-011 Page
3
anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and
air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs
and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular
uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land
throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas,
affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where
provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity
of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,
the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described
herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or
who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute
a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the
provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued
at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,
both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by
this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
Case No. Attachment H
ZA09-011 Page
4
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its
caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least
fifteen (15) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition
of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall
additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of
this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required
by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of ___________, 2009.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of __________, 2009.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
Case No. Attachment H
ZA09-011 Page
5
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment H
ZA09-011 Page
6
EXHIBIT “A”
Lot 1, Block B, Ravenaux Village Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-213, Page 31, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas.
Case No. Attachment H
ZA09-011 Page
7
EXHIBIT “A”
(Reserved for the Approved Uses, Developments Regulations and Plans)
Case No. Attachment H
ZA09-011 Page
8