Loading...
Item 8 - Staff ReportCase No. ZA26-0052 S T A F F R E P O R T October 2, 2026 CASE NO: ZA26-0052 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Touchmark EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Mike Harrall is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Touchmark, on property described as Tracts 1C, 1D01, 1D01A, 1D02A, 1D02B, 1D02, 1F, 1F01, 1E01, 1E02, 1G, Richard Eads Survey, Abstract No. 481, Lot 2, Block 4, Gateway Church-114 Campus, and Lots 11A and 11B, Oaks Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1009 and 1101 N. Carroll Avenue, 1301 E. Highland Street, 1335-1361 and 1375-1379 E. Highland Street, and 1301 E. Kirkwood Boulevard, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “CS” Community Service District, “AG” Agricultural District, and “NR-PUD” Non- Residential Planned Unit Development District. Requested Zoning: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #3 and #4. DETAILS: The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan to develop a Senior Living Community on approximately 18- acres. The Senior Living Community is proposed to include an Independent Living Residence, 9 Courtyard Villa units, 40 Flat Stack units, an Assisted Living and Memory Care Building, and Community Amenities such as dining venues, lounges, activity rooms, fitness and wellness centers, outdoor courtyards, walking paths, and landscaped gardens. The zoning will be exclusively restricted to a Senior Living Use. The Independent Living component will be operated as housing for older persons in accordance with the federal Fair Housing Act, as amended by the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995 (42 U.S.C. § 3607(b)(2); 24 C.F.R. Part 100, Subpart E), and the Texas Fair Housing Act (Texas Property Code § 301.043), and as definition is amended by federal and Texas law. As an additional project specific occupancy requirement, at least one (1) permanent occupant of each Independent Living Unit shall be sixty-two (62) years of age or older at the commencement of occupancy, and no permanent occupant of an Independent Living unit shall be under fifty-five (55) years of age; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not prohibit occupancy by (i) a live-in caregiver or health care provider, (ii) on-site staff essential to community operations, (iii) a surviving spouse or partner of a qualifying occupant, who may remain in residence, or (iv) a person permitted as a reasonable accommodation under applicable law. The owner shall maintain age- verification policies, procedures, and records sufficient to maintain the community’s status as housing for older persons under applicable law. The applicant intends to develop the entirety of the community in two phases. The chart below indicates how many units will be built in each phase. Department of Planning & Development Services Item 8 Case No. ZA26-0052 Total Unit Count Phase 1 Phase 2 Independent Living 150 units 42 units Assisted Living 68 units 16 units Memory Care 16 units 16 units Courtyard Villas 9 units N/A Neighborhood Flats 20 units 20 units Total Unit Count 263 units 94 units 357 units Min. (SF) Max (SF) The Clubhouse 825 SF 2,000 SF The Terrace 375 SF 1,400 SF Courtyard Villas 1,850 SF 2,500 SF Neighborhood Flats 1,900 SF 2,200 SF Site Data summary chart below: Site Data Table Existing Zoning CS – Community Service District Proposed Zoning S-P-2 – Generalized Site Plan District Item Provided Gross Acreage 766,300 SF 17.59 AC Net Acreage 740,716 SF 17.00 AC Building Height Building A 86’-3” Courtyard Villas 18’-0” Neighborhood Flats 42’-0” Building Area Phase 1 Phase 2 Building A 495,300 SF 81,700 SF Courtyard Villas 21,300 SF N/A Neighborhood Flats 58,800 SF 58,800 SF Total Building Area 575,400 SF 140,500 SF 715,900 SF FAR Phase 1 0.78 Total 0.97 Building Coverage Percentage 24.99 % Open Space Area 159,273 SF Percentage 21.50 % Density Phase 1 15.47 DU/AC Total 20.99 DU/AC Total Parking Count Parking Garage 215 spaces Courtyard Villas Garage 9 spaces Case No. ZA26-0052 Neighborhood Flats Garage 40 Spaces Surface Visitor Parking 85 Spaces Surface Staff Parking 70 Spaces Total Parking 419 spaces ACTION: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Zoning Change and Site Plan Staff Review Summary No. 3, dated October 2, 2026 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses PowerPoint Presentation Narrative Plans SPIN Meeting Report Corridor Meeting Report STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Ryan Firestone (817) 748-8127 Case No. Attachment A ZA26-0052 Page 4 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: C.I.S.D, D. Cameron Bryan, Board President, Gateway Church, Kenneth Faunbro APPLICANT: Mike Harrall, Touchmark Development and Construction PROPERTY SITUATION: 501 N. Kimball Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 5B06, S. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial, Mixed Use, Retail Commercial CURRENT ZONING: “CS” Community Service District, “AG” Agricultural District, “NR-PUD” Non- Residential Planned Unit Development District HISTORY: The properties were annexed into the City in 1956 and 1957. The properties are currently unplatted. The first school building in present-day Southlake, located at 1101 N. Carroll Ave., was built in 1919. (1919 Carroll School) September 25, 1956 – The vote to incorporate Southlake was held at the 1919 Carroll School. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The future land use designation for the site are Mixed Use, Office Commercial, and Retail Commercial. Mixed Use: To provide an option for large‐scale, master‐planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses. The range of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the varying proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the Mixed Use category necessitates comprehensively planned and coordinated development. New development must be compatible with and not intrusive to existing development. Further, special attention should be placed on the design and transition between different uses. Typically, the Mixed Use designation is intended for medium to higher‐intensity office buildings, hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and residential uses. Nuisance‐free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and assembly uses that have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi‐Public, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Retail Commercial, and Office Commercial categories. Scale and Context Criteria for the Mixed Use Future Land Use Category: Case No. Attachment A ZA26-0052 Page 5 General • Buildings and their pedestrian entrances are to be oriented towards internal streets. • Larger-format retail uses (with footprints larger than 40,000 square feet) shall be located adjacent to the arterial or highway with pedestrian entrances from internal streets. Retail and Office Uses • Pedestrian-oriented or automobile-oriented. Hotel Uses • Hotel uses should be full-service hotels at market-driven locations, primarily in the S.H. 114 Corridor. Full-service, for the purposes of this plan, shall be hotels that include a table-service restaurant within or directly attached to the hotel. Other services or amenities typically included would be bell service and room service, as well as available meeting space. • The desire is to approve hotels adequate to support market-driven commerce in the City, paying attention to the product mix such that the hospitality services in the area are complementary to one another. Single-family Residential Uses • Residential uses are to be located between the proposed office or retail uses and existing residential neighborhoods. These uses are intended to provide a lower intensity transition between existing neighborhoods and commercial uses. • Residential uses should be well integrated with proposed open space and other civic uses to create a sense of place. S.H. 114 Corridor Plan June 20, 2017 Page 17 • They should also be integrated with proposed commercial uses in a manner that provides internal automobile and pedestrian access to convenience commercial uses. • Single-family residential uses are recommended to be to the density and scale that is appropriate based on the context and character of the proposed overall development. Open Space • Consider environmental elements as “features,” rather than constraints. • Emphasis shall be placed on preservation of existing wooded areas and stream corridors. • Avoid channeling or piping of streams. • Streams or creeks should become a focal point rather than the rear of the development. • Provide natural walking paths along stream and creek corridors. • Well designed and integrated open spaces are critical to the creation of successful mixed-use neighborhoods. Case No. Attachment A ZA26-0052 Page 6 • Open spaces should be designed to add value to proposed development and not as an “after-thought”. To that end, open spaces should maximize frontage along residential and office uses. Open spaces shall occupy a prominent place in the development of a neighborhood and form the center pieces of a community. • Open spaces are intended to be the “front-yards” and invite passive recreational activities. Open spaces may be in the form of pocket parks, children’s play areas, squares, linear greens, and conservation areas. Use the topography as an advantage, do not flatten the site. • Preserve views. Civic Uses • Civic uses such as day-cares, post office, police substation, local government offices, churches, etc. are encouraged. Ideally, civic uses should be located centrally in the development and provide convenient access to all other uses and activities in the development. • Civic uses are to be designed to the scale and context of the neighborhood. Uses are encouraged to be appropriately scaled to the proposed development and generally limited to a maximum of 10,000 square feet of built area. Overall Character and Design for the Mixed Use Future Land Use Category: • Buildings are to be designed to be pedestrian friendly. • Buildings shall have shallow setbacks and sidewalks that are a minimum of 10’. • Buildings are to be oriented towards other buildings (across the street) or towards open spaces. • Minimize the impact of surface parking. • Mix up land uses to maximize shared parking. Office Commercial: The Office Commercial category is a commercial category designed and intended for the exclusive use of office and limited office‐related activities. It is established for and will be allocated to those districts best suited for supporting commercial activity of an office character. It has been established to encourage and permit general professional and business offices of high quality and appearance, in attractive landscaped surroundings with the types of uses and design exterior appearance so controlled as to be generally compatible with existing and future adjacent and surrounding residential development. Properties with this designation may serve as a transition between established residential neighborhoods, major roadways, and retail development. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi‐Public categories previously discussed. Land Use Mix*: The percentages below for the land use mix in the Office Case No. Attachment A ZA26-0052 Page 7 Commercial category are intended only to be guidelines, and greater flexibility may be appropriate under site specific conditions. Land Use Percentage of Acreage Flexibility Allowed Office 85% ±15% Open Space 10% ±10% Civic Use 5% ±5% Total 100% Retail Commercial: The Retail Commercial category is a lower‐ to medium‐intensity commercial category providing for neighborhood‐type retail shopping facilities and general commercial support activities. It is intended to provide limited local retail and/or office uses which serve neighborhoods in close proximity. It is intended that all uses in this category will be compatible with adjacent single family uses, thereby maintaining the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. This category is intended to encourage comprehensively planned developments. In areas where the Retail Commercial designation is adjacent to residentially zoned properties or areas with a residential designation on the Land Use Plan, lower intensity activities such as office or office‐related uses should be planned adjacent to the residential uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi‐Public, and Office Commercial categories previously discussed. Land Use Mix*: The percentages below for the land use mix in the Retail Commercial category are intended only to be guidelines, and greater flexibility may be appropriate under site specific conditions. Land Use Percentage of Acreage Flexibility Allowed Retail 65% ±35% Office 20% ±25% Open Space 10% ±10% Civic Use 5% ±5% Total 100% Public/Semi-Public: Public/Semi‐Public areas are suitable for a wide range of public, civic, and religious uses, such as government offices and facilities, public and private schools, churches and related facilities (including parsonage and parochial schools), cemeteries, and Public Parks/Open Space uses in conjunction with these developments. Case No. Attachment A ZA26-0052 Page 8 Optional Land Use Recommendations: The subject property has the Mixed Medical and Wellness and Office District Overlay MIXED MEDICAL AND WELLNESS AND OFFICE DISTRICT OVERLAY This overlay category is designed to allow a mixture of medical/wellness and office uses. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan designates N. Carroll Avenue an 88’ (A2U) undivided two-lane arterial road, E. Highland Street an 88’ (A4D) divided four-lane arterial road, and Grace Lane a 100’ (A4D) divided four-lane arterial road. The Master Pathways Plan calls for a minimum 5-foot minimum sidewalk along E. Highland St. and a minimum 8-foot multi-use trail along the eastern portion of N. Carroll Ave. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: TRIP GENERATION Carroll Ave. (ITE Codes 241 & 116) 24hr IN (49) OUT (45) AM Peak AM (19) 7:30 – 8:30 AM Peak AM (29) 7:15 – 8:15 AM PM Peak PM (21) 3:15 – 4:15 PM Peak PM (24) 2:45 – 3:45 PM Grace Ln. (ITE Codes 241 & 116) 24hr IN (26) OUT (37) AM Peak AM (10) 7:30 – 8:30 AM Peak AM (16) 7:15 – 8:15 AM PM Peak PM (18) 3:15 – 4:15 PM Peak PM (19) 2:45 – 3:45 PM * Based on the 12th Addition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, ITE codes 252 and 254. TREE PRESERVATION: If the development were proposed as traditional zoning the existing tree cover preservation would not comply with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. There is 18% of existing tree cover and a minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved. A total of 48% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be removed and 52% preserved. UTILITIES: The property is served by a 6-inch water line main and an 8-inch sewer line along E. Highland Street, a 12-inch water line along N. Carroll Avenue and an 8-inch water line along Grace Lane. DRAINAGE: The property partially drains to the west toward N. Carroll Ave, to the north towards E. Highland St. and to the east toward Grace Ln. The proposed drainage pattern will route runoff toward an onsite above ground detention pond at the northwest corner and an underground detention system and above ground detention pond at the northeast corner. The detention system shall be fully designed with the construction plans and shall comply Case No. Attachment A ZA26-0052 Page 9 with the City’s Storm Drainage Ordinance, Ord. No 605. STAFF COMMENTS: The Zoning Change and Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated October 2, 2026, is attached. Case No. Attachment C ZA26-0052 Page 10 Case No. Attachment C ZA26-0052 Page 11 CONCEPT AND SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA26-0052 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 10/02/26 Project Name: Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan – Touchmark at Southlake APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: Mike Haral C.I.S.D, D. Cameron Bryan, Board President Touchmark Gateway Church, Kenneth Faunbro CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 09/22/26 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RYAN FIRESTONE AT 817-748-8127. 1. Please clarify the discrepancy between the total number of units listed in the Development Regulations letter (365 units) and what is shown on the Site Plan (357 units). 2. Site Data Table shows the “Proposed Zoning” as “SP-1”, please revise to “S-P-2”. Case No. Attachment C ZA26-0052 Page 12 Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Case No. ZA26-0052 Review No. Three Dated: September 23, 2026 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: Touchmark – 1101 N. Carroll Blvd (ZSCP) Contact: Keith Martin Phone: (817) 748-8229 Fax: (817) 481-5713 ============================================================================= == The following comments are based on the review of plans received on September 22, 2026 . Comments designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant’s responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. ============================================================================= = TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. On the Tree Conservation Plan enlarge the tree survey identification numbers so they can be clearly read without blowing the plan up to 400%, and they are not blocked and clearly legible. * If the development were proposed as traditional zoning the existing tree cover preservation would not comply with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. There is 18% of existing tree cover and a minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved. A total of 48% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be removed and 52% preserved. The applicant is proposing to 1,200 new trees which adds approximately 4,000 caliper inches and 50% more tree canopy cover over 20years. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. Case No. Attachment C ZA26-0052 Page 13 For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: * The proposed zoning is SP2 and the landscaping is proposed as shown. * Existing tree credits are proposed to be taken within all the required bufferyards. Existing tree credits shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Review No. 3 Date: 9/24/2026 Case No. ZA26-0052 Zoning/Site Plan Case No. Attachment C ZA26-0052 Page 14 Project Name: Touchmark at Southlake Contact: Sandy Endy, P.E. Email: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us Phone: (817) 748-8033 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on: 9/22/2026 It is the applicant’s responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. Please be aware that per the recorded plat, F. Throop N. 1511, Lot 4R, the Restoration Church dedicated 35.1’ of ROW, rather than 37.4’ as shown on the provided exhibits. Please be sure to show the correct ROW dedication on the north side of E. Highland. 2. Sidewalk along the street frontage, that is intended to be public sidewalk, shall be located within the ROW or a dedicated pedestrian easement. Portions of the sidewalk along N. Carroll and E. Highland meanders outside of the ROW and will be required to be located within a dedicated pedestrian easement. * The proposed ROW dedication along N. Carroll of 41’ rather than 44’ is acceptable since the total ROW width will meet the required 88’. * The widening of E. Highland is requested to be completed with construction of this development. The City will cost participate based on the rough proportionality cost. * The provided reduced street cross section for E. Highland has been preliminarily reviewed. 12-foot lanes on both sides of E. Highland are preferred, however, a reduced lane size may be approved due to existing constraints. A final decision on the street cross section will be forthcoming. GRADING AND DRAINAGE: * Underground detention and above ground detention shall be located within a dedicated drainage easement. * A maximum of 2% cross slope is required on all sidewalk, but more specifically the sidewalk along the E. Highland frontage near the N. Carroll intersection. UTILITY * The proposed water and sanitary sewer lines will be required to be located within a dedicated easement. * The waterline long the E. Highland St. is currently a 6-inch line and will be required to be upsized to a 12-inch line. The City will reimburse the oversize cost difference between a 12-inch and an 8-inch. The 12-inch water line shall connect to the 12-inch main within N. Carroll Ave. and the existing 12-inch waterline located approximately 500-feet west of Grace Lane. * 4-inch sanitary sewer service lines shall be connected to the main and not to the manhole. 6-inch sanitary sewer lines shall be connected to the manhole. Case No. Attachment C ZA26-0052 Page 15 Sandra Endy, P.E. Development Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8033 E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us Fire Department Review Case No. ZA26-0052 Review No. 2 Dated: 09/09/2026 Number of Pages: 2 Project Name: 1101 N Carroll Ave – Trademark Senior Living Contact: Lorenzo Chavez, Fire Marshal Phone: 817-748-8671 Fax: 817-748-8181 =========================================================================== The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 08/28/2026. Comments may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. It is the applicant’s responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. =========================================================================== GENERAL COMMENTS: High-rise building definition as amended: A building with an occupied floor located more than 55 feet above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access. An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet. The entry/exit access control devices that impede the designated fire apparatus access on the property must be equipped with an Opticom or KS-2 switch for opening the gate electronically, as well as a means for manual opening of the gate. Where a single gate is provided, the gate width shall be not less than 24 feet. Where a fire apparatus road consists of a divided roadway, the gate width shall be not less than 12 feet. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F2200. The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is located in a vault, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is located on the riser. (Not indicated on the plan to measure) The Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes on the property. (Not indicated on the plan to measure) Firefighter air replenishment system (FARS) shall be provided in new buildings that are 5 or more stories in height. Fire Department radio coverage must be provided throughout the interior of the building as indicated in Section 510 of the 2021 International Fire Code. FD Impact Study to provide insights into expected call volumes and associated costs for emergency medical services for the proposed project. (See Chief Wilson for Study) Case No. Attachment C ZA26-0052 Page 16 FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (Minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) A vertical clearance of 14 feet must also be provided. (Landscape plan may pose vertical clearance issues where trees and shrubs are shown throughout, specifically along the NE side of building A, and from the west entry going both north and south along the fire lane.) Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 250 feet of all exterior portions of the perimeter of buildings on a “hose-lay” basis for sprinklered buildings. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet, approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. One or more of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located not less than 15 feet and not greater than 30 feet from the building and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Hydrants are required at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between. Fire hydrants are required at a maximum spacing of 500 feet for commercial locations with completely sprinkled buildings. Lorenzo Chavez Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8671 E-mail: lchavez@ci.southlake.tx.us General Informational Comments * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * Building permit(s) are required prior to commencement of any work. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Case No. Attachment C ZA26-0052 Page 17 * It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Roadway Impact Fees, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. * Mail delivery method and mailbox location must be coordinated with the United States Postal Service. Case No. Attachment D ZA26-0052 Page 18 Surrounding Property Owners SPO # OWNER ZONING PHYSICAL ADDRESS ACREAGE RESPONSE 1 EAST HIGHLAND PROPERTIES LLC CS 1231 N CARROLL AVE 0.40 NR 2 EAST HIGHLAND PROPERTIES LLC SP1 1201 N CARROLL AVE 0.76 NR 3 RESTORATION CHURCH OF SOUTHLAK CS 1280 E HIGHLAND ST 1.42 NR 4 NORTH CARROLL PROPERTIES LLC SP1 1200 N CARROLL AVE 0.19 NR 5 D'SOUZA ADAM SF1-A 1200 BLYTHE LN 0.08 NR 6 GATEWAY CHURCH NRPUD 1501 E HIGHLAND ST 0.46 NR 7 CARROLL COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS LL SP1 1190 N CARROLL AVE 0.60 NR 8 SOUTHLAKE CITY OF AG 0.07 NR 9 SOUTHLAKE CITY OF AG 1371 E HIGHLAND ST 0.13 NR 10 SOUTHLAKE CITY OF AG 0.11 NR 11 SOUTHLAKE CITY OF AG 0.04 NR 12 PARAGON HAIR CLINIC LLC SP1 1130 N CARROLL AVE 0.04 NR 13 1150 N CARROLL LLC SP1 1150 N CARROLL 0.50 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA26-0052 Page 19 AVE 14 MARRIAGE TODAY NRPUD 1021 GRACE LN 1.86 NR 15 ABSOLUTE LIVING REALTY LLC SP1 1110 N CARROLL AVE 0.48 NR 16 AMERICAN REALTY INVESTORS III C3 1050 E SH 114 1.27 NR 17 MOSSINCO LLC SP1 1011 N CARROLL AVE 0.61 NR 18 BOLLINGER BRENDON AG 1212 CASEY CT 0.32 NR 19 BOLLINGER BRENDON AG 1033 CASEY CT 0.43 NR 20 SOUTHLAKE INVESTOR LLC SP1 1200 E SH 114 1.95 NR 21 BOLLINGER BRENDON SF1-A 997 CASEY CT 0.42 NR 22 GATEWAY CHURCH NRPUD 700 BLESSED WAY 0.05 NR 23 CARROLL OAKS CONSOLIDATED LTD C1 985 N CARROLL AVE 0.07 NR 24 CARROLL OAKS CONSOLIDATED LTD AG 1201 CASEY CT 0.08 NR 25 CARROLL OAKS CONSOLIDATED LTD AG 1213 CASEY CT 0.08 NR 26 BOLLINGER BRENDON SF1-A 1075 CASEY CT 0.01 NR 27 DESIGNER WELLNESS LLC SP1 1170 N CARROLL AVE 0.70 NR 28 CARROLL OAKS CONSOLIDATED LTD AG 979 N CARROLL AVE 0.19 NR 29 CARROLL OAKS CONSOLIDATED LTD AG 950 N CARROLL AVE 0.16 NR 30 BHAGAT ALPA SF1-A 1350 E HIGHLAND ST 0.90 NR 31 CADENCE BANK C3 1000 E SH 114 1.34 NR 32 A&R 1 LLC SP1 1110 E SH 114 1.28 NR 33 ABIDING GRACE LUTHERN CHURCH CS 1000 E HIGHLAND ST 4.03 NR 34 PST HOLDINGS LLC SP1 1206 N CARROLL AVE 0.39 NR 35 CARROLL ISD CS 1301 N CARROLL AVE 13.44 NR 36 SUPERINTENDENT OF CARROLL ISD NR 37 SUPERINTENDENT OF GRAPEVINE COLLEYVILLE ISD NR 38 SUPERINTENDENT OF NORTHWEST ISD NR 39 SUPERINTENDENT OF KELLER ISD NR 1000 CARROLL ISD AG 1375 E HIGHLAND ST 0.70 Case No. Attachment D ZA26-0052 Page 20 1001 GATEWAY CHURCH NRPUD 1301 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.23 1002 CARROLL ISD CS 1.59 1003 CARROLL ISD AG 1009 N CARROLL AVE 0.43 1004 CARROLL ISD CS 0.73 1005 CARROLL ISD CS 1301 E HIGHLAND ST 0.32 1006 CARROLL ISD AG 1379 E HIGHLAND ST 0.77 1007 CARROLL ISD AG 1361 E HIGHLAND ST 1.04 1008 CARROLL ISD CS 0.76 1009 CARROLL ISD AG 0.64 1010 CARROLL ISD CS 1101 N CARROLL AVE 4.63 1011 CARROLL ISD CS 1335 E HIGHLAND ST 3.82 1012 CARROLL ISD AG 1349 E HIGHLAND ST 0.56 1013 CARROLL ISD CS 1301 E HIGHLAND ST 1.75 Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Twenty-Eight (28) Responses Received Outside 300’: In Favor: 32 Undecided: 2 Responses Received with no address listed: In Favor: 1