Item 7 & 8 - PresentationItem 7 & 8
Zoning Change and
Concept/Site Plan
for Touchmark at Southlake
ZA26-0046
OWNER: CISD D. Cameron Bryan, Board President, Gateway Church, Kenneth Faunbro
APPLICANT:Mike Harrall,Touchmark Development and Construction
REQUEST:Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Touchmark,on property described as Tracts 1C,1D01,
1D01A,1D02A,1D02B,1D02,1F,1F01,1E01,1E02,1G,Richard Eads Survey,Abstract No.481,Lot 2,
Block 4,Gateway Church-114 Campus,and Lots 11A and 11B,Oaks Addition,City of Southlake,
Tarrant County,Texas and located at 1009 and 1101 N.Carroll Avenue,1301 E.Highland Street,
1335-1361 and 1375-1379 E.Highland Street,and 1301 E.Kirkwood Boulevard,Southlake,Texas.
Current Zoning:“CS”Community Service District,“AG”Agricultural District,and “NR-PUD”Non-
Residential Planned Unit Development District.Requested Zoning:“S-P-2”Generalized Site Plan
District.SPIN Neighborhood #3 and #4.
CP26-0008:
Requested Land Use:Mixed Use
DETAILS:The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for a
Senior Living Community on approximately 18 acres.
LOCATION:1009 and 1101 N.Carroll Avenue,1301 E.Highland Street,1335-1361 and 1375-1379 E.Highland
Street,and 1301 E.Kirkwood Boulevard
Gateway Church -114 Campus
Cedar Ridge
Highland Estates
F. Throop No. 1511
Addition
Future Land Use
Office Commercial
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Public/Semi-Public
Low Density Residential
Retail Commercial
Public/Semi-Public
Current Zoning
AG
CS
S-P-1
C3
S-P-1
NR-PUD
CS
SF-1A
C3
Street View from N. Carroll Avenue (Facing Northeast)
Street View from N. Carroll Avenue (Facing East)
Street View from E. Highland Street (Facing Southwest)
Site Plan
Site Data Table
Existing Zoning CS -Community
Service District
Proposed Zoning S-P-2 Generalized Site
Plan District
Gross Acreage 766,300 SF
17.59 AC
Net Acreage 740,716 SF
17.00 AC
Building A Height 86’-3”
Courtyard Villas Height 18’-0”
Neighborhood Flats
Height 42’-0”
Open Space Area 159,273 SF
Open Space
Percentage 21.50%
Phasing Plan
Phase 1
Phase 2
Site Plan ComparisonUnit Counts
Total Unit Count
Phase 1 Phase 2
Independent Living 150 units 42 units
Assisted Living 68 units 16 units
Memory Care 16 units 16 units
Courtyard Villas 9 units N/A
Neighborhood Flats 20 units 20 units
Total Unit Count 263 units 94 units
357 units
Min. (SF)Max (SF)
The Clubhouse 825 SF 2,000 SF
The Terrace 375 SF 1,400 SF
Courtyard Villas 1,850 SF 2,500 SF
Neighborhood Flats 1,900 SF 2,200 SF
Site Plan
Total Parking Count
Parking Garage 215 spaces
Courtyard Villas Garage 9 spaces
Neighborhood Flats
Garage 40 Spaces
Surface Visitor Parking 85 Spaces
Surface Staff Parking 70 Spaces
Total Parking 419 spaces
Parking Garage
ingress/egress
Site Plan ComparisonTree Conservation Plan
•If the development were proposed as traditional zoning the
existing tree cover preservation would not comply with the
Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree
Preservation Ordinance 585-E.There is 18%of existing
tree cover and a minimum of 70%of the existing tree cover
would be required to be preserved.A total of 48%of the
existing tree cover is proposed to be removed and 52%
preserved.
Site Plan ComparisonLandscape Plan
Site Plan ComparisonOpen Space Plan
Site Plan ComparisonGrading Plan
Site Plan ComparisonExisting Drainage Plan
Site Plan ComparisonProposed Drainage Plan
•The property partially drains to the west toward N.
Carroll Ave,to the north towards E.Highland St.and
to the east toward Grace Ln.The proposed drainage
pattern will route runoff toward an onsite above
ground detention pond at the northwest corner and an
underground detention system and above ground
detention pond at the northeast corner.The
detention system shall be fully designed with the
construction plans and shall comply with the City’s
Storm Drainage Ordinance,Ord.No 605.
Proposed
underground
detention area
Proposed above
ground detention
pond
Proposed above
ground detention
pond
Site Plan ComparisonProposed Detention Plan
Site Plan ComparisonFencing Plan
Site Plan ComparisonPedestrian Access Plan
Site Plan ComparisonElevations
Site Plan ComparisonElevations
Site Plan ComparisonElevations
Site Plan ComparisonElevations
2
Site Plan ComparisonElevations
Site Plan ComparisonElevations
Site Plan ComparisonElevations
Site Plan ComparisonElevations
Site Plan ComparisonElevations
Site Plan ComparisonElevations
Site Plan ComparisonElevations
Site Plan ComparisonBuilding Heights
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
For:
Opposed:
Undecided:
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Outside 300’
For: 32
Opposed: 0
Undecided: 2
1 Response in favor with no
address given
Questions?
Site Plan ComparisonSanitary Sewer Plan
Site Plan ComparisonWater Plan
Site Plan ComparisonStorm Drain Plan