Item 6 - PresentationItem 6
Zoning Change and Site Plan
for Magnolia Office Park
ZA26-0046
OWNER:Randy Primrose and Taylor Farden,Magnolia Property Company
APPLICANT:Clay Cristy,ClayMoore Engineering
REQUEST:Zoning Change and Site Plan for Magnolia Office Park,on property
described as Tract 5B06,S.Freeman Survey,Abstract No.525,and
located at 501 N.Kimball Avenue.Current Zoning:“AG”
Agricultural District.Requested Zoning:“S-P-1”Detailed Site Plan.
DETAILS :The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a Zoning Change
and Site Plan for an office park development consisting of 5
buildings on approximately 3.62-acres.
LOCATION :501 N.Kimball Avenue
S. Freeman Survey,
Abstract No. 525
N. Kimball Ave.Mesco
Addition
Kimball
Park
Future Land Use
Office
Commercial
Mixed
Use
Public/
Semi-Public
Low Density
Residential
Current Zoning
AG
SF-1A
S-P-2
S-P-2
Site Plan
Site Data Summary
Site Data Summary
Existing Zoning “AG” Agricultural District
Proposed Zoning “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
Land Use Designation Office Commercial
Gross Lot Acreage 3.62 ac. (157,637 SF)
Total Building Area
30,982 SF
Building 1: 4,980 SF
Building 2: 4,980 SF
Building 3: 7,132 SF
Building 4: 7,110 SF
Building 5: 6,780 SF
Floor Area (Gross)
56,434 SF
Building 1: 9,662 SF
Building 2: 9,662 SF
Building 3: 11,772 SF
Building 4: 13,838 SF
Building 5: 11,500 SF
Building Height/Number of Stories 35 feet/2-story
Lot Coverage (%)19.7%
Impervious Coverage (%)70% (110,808 SF)
Pervious Coverage (%)30% (46,829 SF)
Total Parking Required
Office: (1 per 300 SF)
189 spaces
Handicap: 6 spaces
Total Parking Spaces Provided 192 spaces
Handicap: 10 spaces
Variance Request
1.Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1 requires the minimum
centerline spacing for driveways along arterial roads to be 75 feet. The
applicant is requesting a variance to allow spacing of approximately 50 feet
for the eastern driveway along Kimball Avenue.
2.Subdivision Ordinance No. 484, as amended, to Section 8.01, Lotting
Requirements, 8.01.A requires that every lot shall abut on a public or a private
street. The applicant is requesting approval to allow the lots as shown with
access by a common access easement with 26’ fire lane.
Site Plan ComparisonTree Conservation Plan
Existing tree cover:
48.6%
Required minimum
percentage of existing
tree cover to be
preserved: 60%
Existing tree cover
proposed to be
preserved: 19.7%
Site Plan ComparisonLandscape Plan
Site Plan ComparisonUtility Plan
Proposed
8” Sewer Line
Proposed
8” Water Line
Existing
12” Water
Line
Site Plan ComparisonDrainage Plan
Existing Proposed
Proposed underground
detention
Site Plan ComparisonStorm Drain Plan
Proposed underground
detention system
Elevations –Building A
Height: 34’
Floor Plan –Building A
Elevations –Building B
Height: 34’
Height:
~24’-6”
Floor Plan –Building B
Elevations –Building C
Floor Plan –Building C
Elevations –Building D
Height: 34’Height:
~24’-6”
Floor Plan –Building D
Site Plan ComparisonRendering
Site Plan ComparisonBuilding Materials
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
For:
Opposed:
Undecided:
Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Questions?
Site Plan ComparisonGrading Plan
Site Plan ComparisonPedestrian Access Plan