Item 6B - Staff Report CITY OF Item 613
S0UTHLA1<.,,E
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
September 28, 2026
CASE NO: ZA26-0054
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept Plan for 4060 N. White Chapel Boulevard
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Amanda Hellman is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan for
4060 N. White Chapel Boulevard on property described as Tract 16, R.D. Price
Survey Abstract No. 992A. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested
Zoning: "SF-30"Single Family Residential District. Owner And Applicant:Amanda
Hellman. SPIN Neighborhood #1.
DETAILS: The purpose of this request is to seek approval for a Zoning Change and Concept
Plan for the property located at 4060 N. White Chapel Boulevard. The property
encompasses approximately 0.99 acres (43,557 square feet) and is proposed to
be developed in accordance with "SF-30" zoning regulations. As the proposed
concept plan of the property does not meet the minimum one-acre(43,560 square
feet) requirement for"SF-1A"zoning, the next compatible zoning district is"SF-30",
which requires a minimum lot area of 30,000 square feet. This is an existing tract
that currently allows development of a single-family residential home and the
request will not result in an increase in the number of residential dwelling units.
Although the Consolidated Future Land Use Plan calls for "Low Density
Residential," which is defined as one or fewer dwelling units per acre, this is an
existing tract, and no further subdivision is proposed.The requested zoning will not
increase the property's development intensity; it will remain a low-intensity
residential use. As such, the request may be found to substantially conform to the
overall intent of the Low Density Residential designation of the Consolidated
Future Land Use Plan.
The Site Data Summary is shown in the following:
Site Data Summary
Existing Zoning AG
Existing Land Use Low Density Residential
Proposed Zoning SF-30
Number of Residential Lots 1
Gross Acreage 0.99-acres
On August 20, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval (6-0), noting the applicant's willingness to expand the present 20-foot
sideline adjacent to West Bob Jones Road to 35 feet. Following the meeting, the
Case No.
ZA26-0054
applicant provided an updated plan showing the 35-foot setback along West Bob
Jones Road.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing
2) Consider 2nd Reading Approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated September 4, 2026
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map
Ordinance No. 480-849
PowerPoint Presentation
Plans
STAFF CONTACT: Jennifer Crosby (817) 748-8195
Cyndi Cheng (817) 748-8269
Case No.
ZA26-0054
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER AND APPLICANT: Amanda Hellman
PROPERTY SITUATION: 4060 N. White Chapel Boulevard
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 16, R.D. Price Survey Abstract No. 992A
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural District
PROPOSED ZONING: "SF-30" Single Family Residential District
HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the City in 1988.
-A Plat Showing (ZA26-0048)for a single lot consistent with the proposed
concept plan is currently in the review process.
SOUTHLAKE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The future land use designation for the site is Low Density Residential.
Low Density Residential Purpose:
The purpose of the Low-Density Residential land use category is to
provide for and to protect low intensity detached single-family residential
development that promotes the openness and rural character of Southlake.
Definition:
The Low Density Residential category is for detached single-family
residential development at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per
acre. Net density is the number of dwelling units per net acre, which
excludes acreage in all rights-of-way, easement, and lots designated for
public or private streets. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the
Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi-Public categories. The Low
Density Residential category encourages the openness and rural character
of the City of Southlake.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan designates N. White Chapel a 70-foot
undivided two-lane collector (C2U).
The Master Pathways Plan calls for a minimum 5-footfuture sidewalk on N.
White Chapel Boulevard and an equestrian/hiking trail on W. Bob Jones
Road. Equestrian/hike trails are pathways that may vary in width
depending on site conditions and user needs. They are preferred to be
natural surface for hiking and/or horseback riding but may be concrete or
asphalt depending on site conditions.
TREE PRESERVATION: No tree preservation plan was provided at this time.
UTILITIES: The property is served by an 8-inch water line main along Rainey Court,
Case No. Attachment A
ZA26-0054 Pagel
connected by a valve gate on W. Bob Jones Road and an 8-inch sanitary
sewer line along Rainey Court.
DRAINAGE: Drainage flow will follow the natural path from the west to east, ultimately
outletting into the bar ditch within N. White Chapel Boulevard.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: August 20, 2026; Approved (6-0)subject to the Staff Report dated August
14, 2026, and the Concept Plan Review Summary No.2, dated August 14,
2026, noting the applicant's willingness to expand the present 20-foot
sideline adjacent to W. Bob Jones Road to 35 feet.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 1st Reading; September 15, 2026; Approved (7-0) subject to the Staff
Report dated September 4, 2026, and Concept Plan Review Summary No.
3, dated September 4, 2026. Noting the following conditions of approval,
Zoning Change from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-30" Single Family
Residential District for the development of one single family residential lot
and acknowledging that the zoning will not increase the residential
development density of the property. As such, the request is found to be
consistent with the overall intent of the low density residential designation
of the Consolidated Future Land Use Plan, and the city will explore
abandoning a portion of its right of way and potential rezoning to one acre
"SF-1A".
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated September 4,
2026.
Staff comments regarding the "SF-30" zoning district are as follows:
The "SF-30" zoning district is defined in the Zoning Ordinance Section 13
as: "The purpose and intent of the SF-30 Single Family Residential District
is to provide for compatible land, building, and structure uses primarily
oriented to moderately low-density residential purposes,open space uses,
and select community facility uses."
Although the Consolidated Future Land Use Plan calls for "Low Density
Residential,"which is defined as one or fewer dwelling units per acre, this
is an existing tract and no further subdivision is proposed. The requested
zoning will not increase the development intensity of the property, and it
will remain a low-intensity residential use. As such, the request may be
found to substantially conform to the overall intent of the Low Density
Residential designation of the Consolidated Future Land Use Plan.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA26-0054 Page 2
Vicinity Map
4060 N White Chapel Blvd
, I'3
'[�1 V �� 4•. 4
S-,2
s^`1C
U
411).
. t .. •' '- ...
- I 3
5
40
N
0.010-01 0.03 0.04 0.DO yy} W PriL
Miles
La��+
{
'F�yIC 1
�M'n c�� ,� Nw•
ZA26-0054 S
I•.,II�r �"
$GNI
hey 1n,ts�f4'��
Case No. Attachment B
ZA26-0054 Page 1
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA26-0054 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 09/04/26
Project Name: Zoning Change and Concept Plan —4060 N. White Chapel Blvd.
APPLICANT: OWNER:
Amanda Hellman Same as Applicant
1098 Westpark Circle N.
Southlake, TX 76092
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
08/28/26 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE
CONTACT CYNDI CHENG AT (817) 748-8269.
1. Change "Owner's Certificate" to "Legal Description".
Revised plans show 35' front yard setback along W. Bob Jones Rd. as required by the
underlying zoning district.
A Tree Conservation Plan to be submitted with Plat Showing and to be in compliance with
Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585, as amended.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Case No. ZA26-0054 Review No. One Dated: July 22, 2026 Number of Pages: 2
Project Name: Hellman —4060 N. White Chapel Blvd. (Zoning/Concept Plan)
Contact: Keith Martin Phone: (817) 748-8229 Fax: (817) 481-5713
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following comments are based on the review of plans received on July 13, 2026 . Comments
designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the
Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the
P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department representative
shown above and make modifications as required by the comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. Please provide the required Tree Conservation Plan with the Plat Showing submittal.
Information required for Tree Conservation Plan:
i. Identification of Critical Environmental Features of the site:
A. All individually protected trees
Case No. Attachment C
ZA26-0054 Pagel
B. Existing streams, drainage creeks, ponds, and other water bodies (if
any)
ii.Tree Survey or alternative to a tree survey
iii. 2-foot contour map of the site
iv. Protected trees within the tree preservation area including tree size and type
v.Critical Root Zones of groups of trees
vi. Critical Root Zones for individual trees required for site plans only
vii. Boundaries of any tree preservation areas as identified in the ERP Map
viii. Identification of areas of environmental constraints not suitable for development
ix. Identification of areas of minimal environmental constraints that are suitable for
development
x.Areas of encroachment into Critical Environmental Features identified on the site
xi. Clear delineation, for each protected tree, of whether the tree will be preserved
after the proposed development is constructed, altered due to proposed
improvements, or could potentially be saved based upon site specific conditions
xii. Stream/Creek buffers, if any
xiii. Detailed site plan of all proposed improvements. (All proposed improvements
shall be required to be shown only at the site plan stage for all development.
Preliminary plats shall, however, show building setbacks and general location of
buildings and infrastructure.)
xiv.Setbacks, building lines, and buffer yards
xv. The names, addresses and telephone numbers of those persons or entities
who own the property and those persons or entities filing the application
xvi.Such additional information as the Administrative Official may reasonably
require given the particular characteristics of the property.
2. Provide the existing tree canopy cover calculations on the Tree Conservation Plan. The
existing tree canopy cover calculations consist of the total percentage of existing tree canopy cover on
the property, the total percentage of existing tree canopy cover proposed to be removed, and the total
percentage of existing tree canopy cover proposed to be preserved.
Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously
received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the
first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be
preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on Minimum percentage of the
the entire site existing tree cover to be
reserved*
0% —20% 70%
20.1 —40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public
rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA26-0054 Page 2
Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved
Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as
approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements,
utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with
existing trees intended to be preserved.
Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
Public Works/Engineering Review
No comments.
Sandra Endy, P.E.
Development Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southIake.tx.us
Fire Department Review
Case No. ZA26-0054 Review No. 1 Dated: 07/17/2026 Number of Pages: 1
Project Name: 4060 N White Chapel
Contact: Lorenzo Chavez, Fire Marshal Phone: 817-748-8671 Fax: 817-748-8181
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 0711512026. Comments may
be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning
Commission or City Council. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the department
representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL COMMENTS:
An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all residential structures that exceed
6,000 square feet, excluding porches and patios.
To facilitate emergency response, R-3 occupancies should be addressed on the street fronting
the property.
Lorenzo Chavez
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8671
E-mail: Ichavez@ci.southlake.tx.us
Case No. Attachment C
ZA26-0054 Page 3
General Informational Comments
Building permit(s) are required prior to commencement of any work.
All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No.605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,
and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water& Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water
customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the
City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final
plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City
of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount.
Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment C
ZA26-0054 Page 4
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1 PISANI, DEAN C &JACQUELINE S RE5 300 W BOB JONES RD 1.22 NR
TRS DJ PISANI FAMILY TRUST
2 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 1.59 NR
3 PANTHER FORT WORTH 100 LLC SF1-A 4200 RAINEY CT 0.47 NR
4 PANTHER FORT WORTH 100 LLC SF1-A 4204 RAINEY CT 0.41 NR
5 MAYKUS CUSTOM HOMES INC SF1-A 4209 RAINEY CT 0.96 NR
6 PANTHER FORT WORTH 100 LLC SF1-A 4208 RAINEY CT 0.31 NR
7 SADDLEBACK ACRES LP SF1-A 4251 SADDLEBACK LN 0.56 NR
8 MAHONE, MATTHEW J & LEIGH SF1-A 4000 N WHITE CHAPEL 9.50 NR
ANNE BLVD
9 SETU, AMIYA &APARAJITA, RICHA SF1-A 4301 SADDLEBACK LN 1.15 NR
10 SUPERINTENDENT OF CARROLL NR
ISD
11 SUPERINTENDENT OF GRAPEVINE NR
COLLEYVILLE ISD
12 SUPERINTENDENT OF NR
NORTHWEST ISD
13 SUPERINTENDENT OF KELLER ISD ` ` NR
1000 LEGACY LIMITED, LLC AG 4060 N WHITE CHAPEL 0.97
END
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Eleven (11)
Responses Received: One written response in opposition has been received outside the 300-
Case No. Attachment D
ZA26-0054 Page 1
foot notification area; however, that property owner subsequently submitted a written
response in support.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA26-0054 Page 2