Item 6C & 6DItems 6C & 6DItems 6C & 6D
ZA09ZA09--013 & ZA09013 & ZA09--014014
Owners/Owners/
Applicants:Applicants:Jerry Statham & Ron EddinsJerry Statham & Ron Eddins
Request:Request:(6C) Zoning Change & Development (6C) Zoning Change & Development
Plan from “SFPlan from “SF--1A” Single Family 1A” Single Family
Residential & “RResidential & “R--PUD” Residential PUD” Residential
Planned Unit Development to “RPlanned Unit Development to “R--PUD” PUD”
Residential Planned Unit Development Residential Planned Unit Development
for the construction of two (2) singlefor the construction of two (2) single--
family residential lots on 5.05 acres.family residential lots on 5.05 acres.
(6D) Plat Revision for 2 lots on 5.05 (6D) Plat Revision for 2 lots on 5.05
acresacres
Location:Location:2988, 3000, & 3010 Burney Ln.2988, 3000, & 3010 Burney Ln.
Zoning District Map
LU Map
* 2006 Property Lines Shown* 2006 Property Lines Shown
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANELEVATION RENDERINGCONCEPT PLANSITE PLAN
Open Space/Preservation Area
Building Envelope
Tree Preservation Area
(with exception of pad sites,
drives, and septic fields)
Lot Boundaries
572’ Elevation
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
APPROVED & FILED PLAT OF RECORDELEVATION RENDERINGCONCEPT PLANSITE PLAN
PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLANELEVATION RENDERINGCONCEPT PLANSITE PLAN
Existing v. Proposed Development
Existing SituationProposal
3-lot Scenario2-lot Scenario
Subject Area5.05 acres
# / Lots32
# / Potential Homes32
Max. Building Area44,029 sq ft30,822 sq ft
Max. Accessory Building3,350 sq ft2,000 sq ft
Min. Tree Preservation Area66,047 sq ft Canopy66,047 sq ft Canopy
(41,141 “No Disturb”)(64,029 “No Disturb”)
Existing v. Proposed PUD Regulations
Existing PUDPreviously Proposed PUDRevised PUD Proposal
Regulation
January 2007June 2, 2009June 16, 2009
Accessory Bldg1,000 SFPer SF-1A (3% or 1,000 SF
4,000 SF)
3% Lot 1R = 2,638 SF
3% Lot 2R = 3,966 SF
Max. Lot Coverage20%Per SF-1A (20%)14%
Min. Lot Area87,12087,95187,951
Res. Density0.5 du/acre0.4 du/acre0.4 du/acre
Fencing5’ wrought 6’ wrought iron5’ wrought iron
iron
14’ sport court14’ sport court
OSSFNo regulationNot permitted inside Not permitted inside
572’ elev.574’ elev.
Tree Preservation 23%; No 23%; No disturbance 29%;
No disturbance
except for small foot
Easementsdisturbanceexcept for small foot
paths, drainage
paths & drainage
improvements &
improvements
utility installation
Tree Preservation & Building Area
Existing PlanPreviously Proposed PlanRevised Proposal
Lot 1
January 16, 2007June 2, 2009June 16, 2009
Tree Preservation Area20,037 sq ft19,510 sq ft20,688 sq ft
Tree Preservation %22.2%22%23%
Building Envelope Area11,163 sq ft10,633 sq ft10,633 sq ft
Building Envelope %12%12%12%
Lot 2
Tree Preservation Area20,473 sq ft31,147 sq ft43,341 sq ft
Tree Preservation %24%24%33%
Building Envelope Area10,450 sq ft27,000 sq ft23,960 sq ft
Building Envelope %12%20%18%
Total R-PUD
Tree Preservation Area40,510 sq ft50,657 sq ft64,029 sq ft (1.47 ac)
Tree Preservation %23%23%29%
Building Envelope Area21,613 sq ft37,633 sq ft34,593 sq ft
Building Envelope %12%17%15.7%
CONCEPTUAL HOME SITE PLANCONCEPTUAL HOME SITE PLAN
CONCEPTUAL HOME ELEVATIONCONCEPTUAL HOME ELEVATION
≤ 45’
CONCEPTUAL HOME ELEVATIONCONCEPTUAL HOME ELEVATION
PROPOSED PLAT REVISIONPROPOSED PLAT REVISIONELEVATION RENDERINGCONCEPT PLANSITE PLAN
RR--PUD Development RegulationsPUD Development Regulations
The Statham-Eddins R-PUD District will adhere to the uses and
regulations of Section 11 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended
(“SF-1A” Single-Family Residential District) except for the following
changes:
Development Regulations–In this district, the following
•
development regulations shall be applicable:
Height: No building or structure shall exceed forty-five (45) feet.
•
Front Yard: The front yard shall be as shown on the approved
•
Development PlanSide Yard: Side yards shall be as shown on
the approved Development Plan
Rear Yard: The rear yard shall be as shown on the approved
•
Development Plan
Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a
•
maximum lot coverage not exceeding twenty percent (20%) of
the lot area, including all principal and accessory structures.
RR--PUD Development RegulationsPUD Development Regulations
Lot area: The minimum area of a lot shall be eighty-seven
•
thousand nine hundred fifty-one (87,951) square feet.
Lot Dimensions: Dimensions of lots shall be as shown on the
•
approved Development Plan
Floor Area: The main residence shall contain a minimum of
•
three thousand (3,000) square feet of floor area.
Side Yard: Side yards shall be as shown on the approved
•
Development Plan
Rear Yard: The rear yard shall be as shown on the approved
•
Development Plan
Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a
•
maximum lot coverage not exceeding fourteen percent (14%) of
the lot area, including all principal and accessory structures.
RR--PUD Development RegulationsPUD Development Regulations
Tree Preservation Easements–Disturbance of areas within the tree
•
preservation easements shall be limited to small foot paths and
drainage improvements.
Access–Due to environmental considerations, all lots shall be
•
permitted to front private access easement rather than a public street.
Access shall meet the minimum fire department requirements.
Fencing–Fencing shall be restricted to a maximum of five (5) feet
•
unless otherwise mandated by any other city, state, or safety
requirements and shall be wrought iron or a powder coating of that
style of fence.Said fencing shall not exceed the area depicted on the
development plan, shall not infringe upon the tree preservation
easement, and fencing for enclosure of the backyard/pool area shall
not require removal of trees greater than 4” in diameter.Fencing shall
completely enclose the pool area.Fencing for any sport court use
shall not exceed fourteen (14) feet in height and shall be of a black-or
green-coated chain link type.
RR--PUD Development RegulationsPUD Development Regulations
Swimming Pool / Spa–For any swimming pool design, the
•
pool’s filtration system shall be designed to ensure that no salt
water will discharge onto the natural grade in order to protect
existing, natural vegetation.In the event the pool must be
drained, an Environmental Engineer shall be consulted in
advance for sampling/testing of the pool water to ensure that
draining the pool will not have a detrimental impact on natural
vegetation in the area due to the salt, chlorine or other chemical
content in the water.If the City of Southlake determines that
the water will likely have a detrimental impact on the natural
vegetation in the area, the pool shall be drained by use of a
mobile pump truck or other mechanism to prevent drainage on
the property.
On-Site Sewage Facility (OSSF)–OSSF systems shall be
•
designed so that no septic field is located within the Corps of
Engineers Flowage Easement nor shall any aerobic system
spray directly into the elevation contour of 574-feet.
Board Review / Citizen InputBoard Review / Citizen Input
Planning & Zoning CommissionPlanning & Zoning Commission
May 21, 2009; Approved (5May 21, 2009; Approved (5--0), noting that Letter ‘A’ of 0), noting that Letter ‘A’ of
Development Regulations will be returned to the original RDevelopment Regulations will be returned to the original R--PUD PUD
height limitation of fortyheight limitation of forty--five (45’) while allowing the applicant the five (45’) while allowing the applicant the
opportunity to construct an observation tower not to exceed 300 opportunity to construct an observation tower not to exceed 300
square feet whose roof height shall not exceed fiftysquare feet whose roof height shall not exceed fifty--five feet (50’) five feet (50’)
in height measured at the roof’s ridge; subject to Staff Review in height measured at the roof’s ridge; subject to Staff Review
Summary No. 2, dated May 15, 2009.Summary No. 2, dated May 15, 2009.
Board Review / Citizen InputBoard Review / Citizen Input
City Council 1City Council 1 stst ReadingReading
June 2, 2009; Approved (4June 2, 2009; Approved (4--3) subject to the applicant’s representations tonight; 3) subject to the applicant’s representations tonight;
accepting the applicant’s agreement to review the adjustment of the septic fields accepting the applicant’s agreement to review the adjustment of the septic fields
and moving them closer to the home; accepting the applicant’s willingness to look and moving them closer to the home; accepting the applicant’s willingness to look
at areas where the building envelope can be reduced; applicant to look at areas at areas where the building envelope can be reduced; applicant to look at areas
where the tree preservation areas can be expanded and will submit those to staff where the tree preservation areas can be expanded and will submit those to staff
in advance of the next meeting allowing sufficient time for those documents to be in advance of the next meeting allowing sufficient time for those documents to be
reviewed by staff who will complete a comparison of this layout versus two lots; reviewed by staff who will complete a comparison of this layout versus two lots;
accepting the applicant’s commitment that if the pool is drained, they will consult accepting the applicant’s commitment that if the pool is drained, they will consult
with the City’s environmental coordinator to ensure that any discharge will meet with the City’s environmental coordinator to ensure that any discharge will meet
City ordinance and State requirements and will also get back to City Council on the City ordinance and State requirements and will also get back to City Council on the
requirements with respect to the pool backwash to determine how that will be requirements with respect to the pool backwash to determine how that will be
handled; accepting the applicant’s commitment that the placement of fencing handled; accepting the applicant’s commitment that the placement of fencing
would not be cause for the removal of trees and he will review his fencing plan and would not be cause for the removal of trees and he will review his fencing plan and
give Council a revised fencing plan that will pull the fence back from the currently give Council a revised fencing plan that will pull the fence back from the currently
specified tree area and closer to the building envelope; accepting applicant’s specified tree area and closer to the building envelope; accepting applicant’s
willingness to review lot coverage which will most likely be less that 14%; and willingness to review lot coverage which will most likely be less that 14%; and
subject to Development Review Summary No. 2, dated May 15, 2009.subject to Development Review Summary No. 2, dated May 15, 2009.
Questions?Questions?
Tree Preservation & Building Area
Existing PlanFiled PlatPreviously Proposed PlanRevised Proposal
Lot 1
January 16, 2007December 3, 2007June 2, 2009June 16, 2009
Tree Preservation Area20,037 sq ft16,787 sq ft19,510 sq ft20,688 sq ft
Tree Preservation %22.2%19%22%23%
Building Envelope Area11,163 sq ftn/a10,633 sq ft10,633 sq ft
Building Envelope %12%n/a12%12%
Lot 2
Tree Preservation Area20,473 sq ft24,354 sq ft31,147 sq ft43,341 sq ft
Tree Preservation %24%28%24%33%
Building Envelope Area10,450 sq ftn/a27,000 sq ft23,960 sq ft
Building Envelope %12%n/a20%18%
Total R-PUD
Tree Preservation Area40,510 sq ft41,141 sq ft50,657 sq ft64,029 sq ft (1.47 ac)
Tree Preservation %23%23.5%23%29%
Building Envelope Area21,613 sq ftn/a37,633 sq ft34,593 sq ft
Building Envelope %12%n/a17%15.7%