Loading...
Item 7D Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T June 10, 2009 CASE NO:ZA08-062 PROJECT:Zoning Change and Concept Plan for 520 S. White Chapel Blvd. REQUEST: William LaFavers and Gary Hood are requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “SF-20A” Single-Family Residential District for the construction of a new residence on 0.67 acres located at 520 S. White Chapel Blvd. The concept plan shows a building envelope to include an accessory building behind the main residence. The applicant has a case pending before the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) on June 11, 2009 requesting a variance to Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 13.5(f), requiring a minimum lot area of thirty thousand (30,000) square feet for “SF-30” zoning. If the variance is approved, the applicant will change the zoning request from “SF-20A” to “SF-30”, which allows for the construction of a family quarters with approval of a Special Exception Use Permit from ZBA (Ord. 480, Section 44.12(1)). The sum total of accessory buildings in “SF-20A” zoning districts shall not exceed 600 square feet. The existing metal accessory building at the rear of the property is approximately 1500 square feet. It may remain so long as it is compliant with the provisions for a non-conforming structure as defined in the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.The construction of any additional accessory buildings or structures on the property will require approval of a Special Exception Use Permit from ZBA to allow for construction of accessory buildings or structures of a size or aggregate size greater than that permitted under the accessory building requirements of the zoning district of the property (Zoning Ord. 480, Section 44.12(3)). The family quarters may be attached to the principal structure, in which case it would not be classified as an accessory structure. Its size would still be limited by the maximum lot coverage regulation, which is thirty percent (30%) for “SF-20A” and twenty percent (20%) for “SF-30” zoning. No additional variances are being requested. ACTION NEEDED: Consider first reading approval of a zoning change and concept plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map Link to PowerPoint Presentation (C) Plans and Support Information – (D) Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 15, 2009 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map (F) Surrounding Property Owner Responses (G) SPIN Report (H) Ordinance No. 480-579 for Commission and Council Members Only (I) Full Size Plans () Case No. ZA08-062 STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817)748-8067 Richard Schell (817)748-8602 Case No. ZA08-062 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: William E. LaFavers and Gary Hood PROPERTY SITUATION: 520 S. White Chapel Blvd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 3E, Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581 LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential OPTIONAL LAND USE CATEGORY: “RC” Rural Conservation CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District PROPOSED ZONING: “SF-20A” Single-Family Residential District (min. 20,000 SF) or “SF-30” Single Family Residential (min. 30,000 SF) if the pending variance request to Zoning Ord. No. 480, Section 13.5(f) before the Zoning Board of Adjustment is approved. TREE CONSERVATION PLAN: All existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Concept Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN: The applicant is exempted from providing the 6’ sidewalk planned along the west side of S. White Chapel Blvd. due to the fact that the lot will be platted as a single lot of record, sidewalks are not existing on both sides of the lot, and the lot is not located within 1,500 feet of a school. (Subdivision Ord. No. 483, Section 5.06.B.2.d) TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan recommends S. White Chapel Blvd to be a 2- lane, undivided arterial with 88 feet of right-of-way. The appropriate amount of right-of-way will be dedicated for this roadway when the property is platted. Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed lot has direct access onto S. White Chapel Blvd., a 2-lane, undivided arterial roadway. May 2008 traffic counts on S. White Chapel Blvd. (between F.M. 1709 and Continental Blvd.) 24hr 5,5656,657 North Bound (NB) () South Bound (SB) () AM 616515 () 7:15 am –8:15 pm () 7:30 – 8:30 am Peak PM 461754 () 3:00 – 4:00 pm () 3:30 – 4:30 pm Peak Case No. Attachment A ZA08-062 Page 1 Traffic Impact There will be no additional traffic impact, as an existing residence is proposed to be replaced by a new residence. SOUTHLAKE 2025/ STRATEGIC LINK: The underlying land use designation is Low Density Residential. Although the proposed development is not consistent with the Low Density Residential designation, it is on a single existing tract and there will be no increase in density. WATER & SEWER: There is an existing 12” water line in White Chapel to serve this property. There is an existing 8” sanitary sewer line along the west property line to serve this property. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS: The property drains generally to the west. P&Z ACTION: January 22, 2009; Approved (7-0) accepting the applicants offering that the northern boundary is to remain evergreen shrubs and would not include wood fencing; and Subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 15, 2009. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: February 3, 2009; Approved on consent (5-0) to table to February 17, 2009. February 17, 2009; Approved on consent (5-0) to table to March 3, 2009. March 3, 2009; Approved on consent (5-0) to table to April 7, 2009. April 7, 2009; Approved on consent (7-0) to table to April 21, 2009. April 21, 200; Approved on consent (6-0) to table to May 5, 2009. May 5, 2009; Approved on consent (6-0) to table to May 19, 2009. May 19, 2009; Approved on consent (6-0) to table to June 16, 2009. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 15, 2009. Case No. Attachment A ZA08-062 Page 2 Case No. Attachment B ZA08-062 Page 1 CONCEPT PLAN Case No. Attachment C ZA08-062 Page 1 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ZA08-062Two01/15/09 Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review: 520 S. White Chapel Blvd. -Concept Plan Project Name: APPLICANT: Gary Hood OWNER: Bill Lafavers 1515 Cannon Pkwy #612 Roanoke, TX Phone: (817) 229-6300 Phone: E-mail: garyhood@hood-construction.com Fax: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/05/09 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602 OR DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072. 1. Show, label and dimension the width of the R.O.W. and traveled roadway on or adjacent to the site. 2. Show and label a Type “B” bufferyard along S. White Chapel Blvd. Public Works/Engineering Review Cheryl Taylor Civil Engineer (817) 748-8100 ctaylor@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. WATER AND SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: * There is an existing 12” water line in White Chapel to serve this property. * There is an existing 8” sanitary sewer line along the west property line to serve this property. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: * Proposed driveway culverts must be sized by an engineer and submitted for approval to the City Engineer. * This property drains into Critical Drainage Structure #20 and may require a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction ($214.29/acre). * The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836. * This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of Case No. Attachment D ZA08-062 Page 1 construction plans. *=Denotes informational comment. Informational Comments: * The maximum lot coverage is 30%. The sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600 square feet. The existing accessory building is approximately 1500 square feet. It may remain so long as it is compliant with the provisions for a non-conforming structure as defined in the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Concept Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. * The applicant is exempted from providing the 6’ sidewalk planned along the west side of S. White Chapel Blvd. due to the fact that the lot will be platted as a single lot of record, sidewalks are not existing on both sides of the lot, and the lot is not located within 1,500 feet of a school. (Subdivision Ord. No. 483, Section 5.06.B.2.d) * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Case No. Attachment D ZA08-062 Page 2 Surrounding Property Owners 520 S. White Chapel Blvd. SPO # Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Response 1. NR McLemore, Mark T Etux Capri SF1-A Low Density Residential 3.93 2. NR Anderson, Wilfred E Etux V SF1-A Low Density Residential 3.04 3. U Linkous, J Ronald Etux Regina AG Low Density Residential 1.90 4. NR Vpg Investment Ltd SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.46 5. NR Vpg Investments Ltd SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.60 6. NR Swift Custom Homes Inc SF20A Medium Density Residential 0.63 7. NR Lafavers, William E & Phyllis AG Low Density Residential 4.97 8. NR Lafavers, William E & Phyllis AG Low Density Residential 0.73 9. NR Lafavers, William E & Phyllis SP1 Low Density Residential 0.18 Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Case No. Attachment E ZA08-062 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owner Responses 520 S. White Chapel Blvd. Notices Sent: Nine (9) Responses Received: One (1) 1. J. Ronald and Regina Linkous, 500 S. White Chapel Blvd., Southlake, TX; Notification Submitted a Undecided About Response Form stating on January 20, 2009 (attached). Case No. Attachment F ZA08-037 Page 1 Linkous_Page_1_of_2 Case No. Attachment F ZA08-037 Page 2 Linkous_Page_2_of_2 Case No. Attachment F ZA08-037 Page 3 Case No. Attachment F ZA08-037 Page 4 SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. ZA08-062 PROJECT NAME: 520 S. White Chapel SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN # 14 MEETING DATE: October 13, 2008, 7 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: 1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS MEETING ROOMS 3A & 3B TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Five (5)  SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: Ron Evans (#14)  APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Gary Hood, Owner  STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Lorrie Fletcher, (817)748-8069; lfletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation The property is located at 520 S. White Chapel, just north of the Feedstore BBQ. Development Details  Applicant is proposing a zoning change from AG Agricultural District to SF-30 Single Family Residential District.  The purpose of the zoning change is to enable the owner to tear down and rebuild one house on one nd lot. His plan proposes an interim living quarters constructed as a 3-car garage with 2 story living space. There is an associated application in process for the Zoning Board of Adjustment in requesting approval for this variance. QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION  A brief discussion was held regarding proposed location of house and setbacks. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment G ZA08-062 Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-579 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 0.67 ACRES SITUATED IN HIRAM GRANBERRY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 581, TRACT 3E, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO "SF-20A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AS DEPICTED UPON THE CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT “B” AND SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural, under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing Case No. Attachment H ZA08-062 Page 1 called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over- crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Case No. Attachment H ZA 08-062 Page 2 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being approximately a 0.67 acre tract of land situated in the Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tract 3E, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural to "SF-20A" Single Family Residential as depicted upon the Concept Plan attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and subject to the following conditions: 1. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Case No. Attachment H ZA 08-062 Page 3 Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of ___________, 2009. _____________________________ MAYOR Case No. Attachment H ZA 08-062 Page 4 ATTEST: _____________________________ CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of __________, 2009. _____________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _____________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY DATE:___________________________ ADOPTED:________________________ EFFECTIVE:______________________ Case No. Attachment H ZA 08-062 Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" Reserved for Metes and Bounds Case No. Attachment H ZA 08-062 Page 6 EXHIBIT "B" Reserved for Approved Concept Plan Case No. Attachment H ZA 08-062 Page 7