Item 7D (2)CITY OF
OUTHL KE
9
Integrity
Innovation
Accountability
Commitment
to Excellence
Teamwork
ZA08=062
ner
pp icant: Bill LaFavers and Gary Hood
Request: Approval of a zoning change and
concept plan from "AG"
Agricultural District to "SF-20A"
Single -Family Residential District
Location: 520 S. White Chapel Blvd., being
described as Tract 3E, Hiram
Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581
and being approximately .67 acres
Land Use Map
520 South Whit har)el Boulevard
SHE■■ = m -
1000 0 1000
000 3000 Feet
Land Use De icnatien:
Low Density Residential
LEGEND
'IOU YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUUNDAR
PUBLIC PARKS::UPEN SPACE
PU B LICfSE 1411-PU B L IC
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
LM 2%
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE COMMERCIAL
RETAIL COMMERCIAL
- MI ED USE
TOWN CENTER
REGIONAL RETAIL
INDUSTRIAL
LOCATION MAP
Optional Land Use Map
520 South White Chapel Boulevard
Zoning Map
520 South White Chapel Boulevard
SP2
0-297
::RI
i 2
G1 01
CS
SF1-A
SF1-A
Sri
1000 0 1000 2000
�9 Current r�nin:
vRI A - Agricultural
C3 K - `R LEGEND
- 0 AG - AGRICULTURAL
® RE - RESIDENTIAL ESTATE
"-730 SF1A- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
0 SF1B-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
0 SF30- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
0 SF20A- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
0 SF20B- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
0 RPUD- RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
0 MFI -TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
0 MF2- MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
0 MH- MANUFACTURED HOUSING
0 CS- COMMUNITY SERVICE
0 01 - OFFICE DISTRICT
0 02 - OFFICE DISTRICT
0 C1 - NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
C2- LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL
LLD C3- GENERALCOMMERCIAL
0 04-ARTERIALMALLCOMMERCIAL
®IIPPU6-II :II-P.ESIGEIITIi;L PLi:IIIIED UIIITC-E.EL-:-PLIEIIT
® HC - HOTEL
0 B1 - BUSINESS SERVICE PARK
0 B2- COMMERCIALMANUFACTURING
0 H - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
0 L - HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
0 SP1 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
0 SP2- GENERALIZED SITE PLAN
dT -DOWNTOWN DISTRICT
LOCATION MAR
3000 Feet
v *l:
3�1
- _
,
41
,a
�r
R
w
" r
k�':l-
at—amw
46,
CA
1 �
St- � � li� d _ � n 1 . r aS• sk .fr,.. .'+�e'r,� ��YI+I'
F
r r
yak
•P7
O'
lowmom
Ak
H x
F �
�� �* f�� .. �+- '" ' �tl _� r . . ems; � "�}.� ,,,ii� � � F� •j��
' ..' �,. - 1 '� '•lire X J � ,,,te„� La.
ry 5c
5
!AW&: ry4
4.
40
. � '�... .-..: , '�r .�•�, fir;''
r
•
,fr
—Proposed 5tructure
Q—Existing Trees (size vary) EiOOD, Garage & Guest SuiteProposed Drive
�iOr PAN Future Pad N
1, I _T_.....__r.__--__—__.w_.__._ !0�HackbeT�_ �1�_� _��_,........�HTckb`;7y
72" Hackberr4 st3 72" HackbenyQ
_/
3K 12" Elm
/
w
En
36" Heck{�e
�Im �bl i1.C,
ter_.
r
3BG Faring
10" Fear
qj
;'Z"'a
4��
ZA08=062
P & Z Action: January 22, 2009;
Approved (7-0) accepting the
applicant's offering that the northern
boundary is to remain evergreen
shrubs and would not include wood
fencing; and Subject to Concept Plan
Review Summary No. 2, dated January
153 20090
CITY OF
CITY OF
0 9 1<-E
Questions?
Integrity
Innovation
Accountability
Commitment
to Excellence
Teamwork