Item 6C SPIN ReportSPIN MEETING REPORT
SPIN Item Number: SPIN2026-05
City Case Number: ZA26-0022
Project Name: Breeze Way at Carroll
SPIN Neighborhood: 9
Meeting Date: May 12, 2026
Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX
City Council Chambers
Total Attendance: 11
Hosts: Ryan Firestone
Applicant Presenting: Curtis Young
City Staff Present: Ryan Firestone (Assistant to the Director, Planning and
Development Services)
FORUM SUMMARY:
Property Situation: 940 S. Carroll Avenue, 1000-1040 Breeze Way
Development Details:
x Proposing a 6-lot single-family residential subdivision.
Presentation:
Presentation to the City
Breeze Way at Carroll
Southlake
To help protect yourprivacy, PowerPoint has blocked automatic download of this picture .
Southlake, Tex as
Breeze Way at Carroll
Timarron
Versailles
Vicinity Aerial
Site
Timarron Timarron
Old Union Elementary
Breeze Way at Carroll
Adjacent Zoning
RPU D
RPUD
RPU D
SF-20A
CS
Breeze Way at Carroll
Site Aerial
12 -14,000 S.F.
LOT S
11 -13,000 S.F.
LOTS
15,000 S.F.
LOTS 1 ACRE
Breeze Way at Carroll
Concept Plan
Breeze Way at Carroll
Master Plan
Breeze Way at Carroll
Existing Drainage
Detail
DA-1
1.20 AC
3.53 CFS
Breeze Way at Carroll
Proposed Drainage
Detail
DA-1
0.43 AC
2.32 CFS
Comments, Questions, and Concerns:
C: I am opposed to this project for a couple of reasons. The drainage issue was already
discussed. I have seen Continental flooded twice in 17 years that I have been here rushing
down what I think is Bear Creek. In addition to the drainage, I am concerned with the traffic
situation. With Old Union and Breeze Way located where they are, the sharpness of the turns to
go from Breeze Way headed north onto Carroll Ave. and going in the other direction as well it
gets very crowded especially during the pickup and drop-off times at Old Union Elementary. So,
I am greatly opposed to the whole project. It seems to me that we are squeezing six homes into
a very small acreage even though the lots are shown to be bigger. I also feel that it is not just
the lot size it is the concrete, the surface area and the drainage problems resulting from that
extra concrete.
A: There is often times where a development can create a better drainage situation then what is
existing and we believe that is what this will do especially on the west side there. We are going
to minimize and reduce the amount of drainage that goes into our neighbors’ yards. We are not
along Continental, and I don’t really think this will affect the drainage along Continental at all.
From a traffic standpoint, I don’t think four additional lots is going to move the needle. Especially
since it used to be a church and there was a time where there was a tremendous amount of
traffic going in and out of there. Anyways, I think these lots are larger than the lots around us
and I think the open space on these lots will be larger than the other lots. I appreciate your
comments, but I think this is something that fits the area and will work well.
C: Well, number one on drainage you are directing water from lots 5 and 6 and maybe 1, 2, and
4 onto Breeze Way, which heads directly down to Continental. As far as the church, there’s no
conflict with church traffic and school traffic, so I disagree with your response there and you are
not showing the driveways for lots 1 and 2. I assume those will be on Breeze Way?
A: Certainly, they would be for Lot 1. Lot 2 would probably have the choice of either that or
going into the internal road. Probably the internal road.
Breeze Way at Carroll
Master Plan
C: There’s just a lot of congestion. When people traveling north on Breeze Way have to go into
the wrong lane to get out when parents are lined up it is terrible and putting those extra drives
there is only going to complicate things.
A: Well, I would suggest people follow the traffic rules.
SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither
verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues
and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken
as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning
Commission and final action by City Council.
Southlake Connect Results for May 12, 2026, SPIN Town Hall Forum