Loading...
Item 6Apop CITY C)F Item 6A SOUTH AKE tow, we Zoning Change and Concept Plan 1833 Our Ln. ZA1 3 =043 Owner: Scott and Becky Johnson Applicant: M. Christopher Homes Request: Approval of a zoning change and concept plan from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1 A" Single Family Residential District Location: 1833 Our Ln., described as Tracts 2C11 , 2C12 and 2C13, W. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1068 Future Land Use 1833 Our Ln. Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential Future Land Use Update-2012 LU_TYPE 100-Year Flood Plain Corps of Engineers Property Public Park/open Space Public/Semi-Public SADDLECREEK DR (PVT) Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Office Commercial Retail Commercial Mixed Use Town Center Regional Retail LU Industrial Q J J 0 115 230 4W TUSCAN RIDGE Feet > o a a z _ J lY ri: O iCy i _ L- i Zoning 1833 Our Ln. AG:Agricultural District �AG - C1 ®RE - C2 P SHA - C3 SF1B - C4 ®SF2 - NR-PUD SA DLFc 0 SF30 HC 0�FEK SF20B B2-R-PUD 11 -MF1 12 OP1�S DR -MF2 0 SP1 -MH 0 SP2 0 CS - DT LLJ 0 01 TZD QI 02 ECZ J 2 0 1125 225 450 J Feel Q � O - r- i i f ..�. •r L. J., t � � ` "'- '� . �. ►., . e, .., at ► .►A Via►. Let 'or t"!a Aerial R ti ti. f f Y , i -fit, •i y L + =ftti_ r# Ai AILI •< 40 4W l View South '�` y°'� '� ^� „1'� -� ��'�� :, .•�may` � d � .� 'c.- ads +�.tx.•w - ;.�,_- -4Mfo •� - .� `�,;•K me t _ q �,�� -'fie„ � '�^ { � �* --4,Y:� "`rir �_ •i ��,e�.� t fm a f � 'N s_ L.U.D. ° ' ,..� Tree Legend SF-1A 50Ir", 2, L-T_'.. SADOLE SE S.g L T P R T G. Tree to remain-undisturbed CO CREiE I T nuT,L-L L T rv .... ..-I I -, • / �•••CmW / ,. �� —.�.•� ,---�E—�—_--�— ----_. ew ------ -----_—_,y # c�mM Tree to be removed ��� E f� r I •W�� •r E. LOT 8, W. MARTIN NO. 1067 ADDITION„Q ChW I Tree to remain-if possible _ I _=_s=_ =W 72,454 SQ. FT. OR _ __- p °•I 1.663 ACRES p• . 0 T r v �- l= C� R°aE""r SCOTT A. JOHNSON r w�a t o .I.HE_.L HI I- _ $I rc __ �" „D, INST, NO. D206106289 Io �� L.U.D. a"E� HI I- f I •,� <` = a. O.P.R.T.C.T. INST N0. .� PROP. RESIDENCE--= I T.c.T ,�,. 5,650 SF CO L.U.D. "� I °" ;;� a a. f �I� y �• �i L S F-1 A Tree Coverage Preservation %of Existing Tree Coverage Entire Site - 46% (77 trees) I __eo — I ... Tura E:'T. Min.%of Existing Tree Coverage to be Preserved - 50% L———_ _—— — _ �.sD'B_L————————�—————— i Trees to be Removed/Possible - 12 i - - -- - - =°= rvr &UTILITY PRIVATE ROAD ---- •.eRw aroPw Trees to Remain/Preserved - 65 3 &unuT EASEMENT -------- ---------- ----------- ..x.-- 8 B S89'13'00"W 396.68' Q METAL BUILDING .V.PEw P,WNN 0.o 3.i.C,T /y IN9L2agLLEC,110359 0 A Imo.2C}q,CaLLEO 0.0]qC.J I 16�� ]"� (lR.3[..v_ .c i. PC.) 60'PUBLIC UTILITY&PRIVATE ROADWAY ACCESS EASEMENT AG I INST.NO.D211081890 L•U•D• • 6° AG T C _ GENE''. E ( I��*PROP.PH AG t`C 7 I 66 Concept/Tree Conservation Plan Option s L.U.D. Tree Legend , s SwIN,•=� SF-1A K 5E LOT pEEgpRgDE5g212 LOT 2 SAe. A. t.G;T. 'UTILITY EASEMENT Tree to remain-undisturbed -:,,-FE,E Z,1 NST.N0.D204141515 NT — _— —_--_------ -----_-- --------------_1V89 Z6'lT0"1`396:7V- — tY[W— — tY[ut ?taut Tree to be removed + 20'B.I. -- ax t C r.W Y Tree to remain-if possible `�" °� �- Y6uE I I FT 4F11Plo P R.TC.T. cTr _ H. r00L.U.D. 'IHE L"HIHI +. O \ �� �' - � T T �� v0L 9021,PC.LS-E HII- I t m ,W,ES M.SEALS'J' �(TR 2CI.CALLED 0.93 AC. SF-1A L.U.D. Tree Coverage Preservation %of Existing Tree Coverage Entire Site -46% (77 trees) _ 3a —— 'S'V UTY ESMT. Q J� m•on I Min.%of Existing Tree Coverage to be Preserved-50% I Trees to be Removed/Possible- 6 i _ — — — PRJP.w WRAY r - RUTY EASEMENT — e ex+xwovew `� Trees to Remain/Preserved-71 __ 1_—_____--- ----- -------- -Md3T N0.D2D3042916 �� S89•1 3 0L] W 396 68' METAL BUILDING ANDREW P.WNN NST.NO D2°4110359 0 R.R.TC.T. (TR.—A.CALLED C.0 AC` ,I .r 6.^,'PJBLIC UTILITY&PRIVATE oAw r' �Qy+R JR.2C2,CALLED 0.93 AG ROADWAY ACCESS EASEMENT _ INST.Na.oznaeleea L,U,D, AG TR E E E C 1no T T i PROP.FN AG LOT 3 SAOt" A SLAG t LOT 2 LOT 1 5'uPLIiY EASEMENT GAB P F Z G <� LL 1—N0.DIMIg151! (L/J�N (ml<ul .LnwWp lE ra QW O 0 .wM uLL 0 )O'B L O n 0 5'DRAIN.EMIT. LOT 8, W. MARTIN NO. 1067 ADDITION 1V DRAIN Es T ® 72,454 SO. FT. OR !J (NOL 1!(D1. gSBJ 0 1,663 ACRES D.R.T.C.T..T. 0 RAR 1 ZI 0 0 ® � OIO W NO 1 88 AOOITIW N Q aR-T f26. O O O SCOTT A.JOHN50N 0 N ew cxlope uw f II OO 0 INST.O.P.R.T.�706269 ¢ ID RR N.c.ozaeoucs a l r r 0 � O Lm m m I� b•BL !O'PUBLIC URJIY k PRIVATE J I O 0 ®I ROAOW�Av ACSCES -D' DE I:DlB O ]C 0 O 0 — I OPDSED ONE�p PRIVATE ROAD 0 �X14a col nm - S89'13'00'w 396. 8' 0 METH eu°LDI� GD Puauc um Tr A PRIVATE ROADWAY AC CEss EASEMENT b' IrvsT No.oznoelegG � N a oornNG e Rc a 1 v,R NO c.ozousees' 72,454. TR�zcsnl. ­TX, 3 acr s A V0.11814.PG. !I! (TR.]CIO.CALLED 0.57 AC.1 (TR.2C8,CALLED 0.57 AL) O.R.T.C.T. m n�rc (TR.2C9.CALLED 0.5]AC.) YZ F. JOSH SHATLEV VOL 16127,PG.78 D.R.T.C.T. (M.2C3,CALLED 0.57 AC.) 6 FIRE LANE SCALE 1:20 • • Variance Request A variance to the Public Street requirement of the Subdivision is required: Variance to Subdivision Ord. No. 483, Section 8.01 (A), which requires that all lots front on a public or private street. Our Lane is currently a private street that doesn't meet the Subdivision Ordinance requirements in Section 5.04 and 5.05 regarding private streets. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow the lot to front on Our Lane as it currently exists and has submitted a letter agreeing to the conditions that have been placed on other lots that have been approved on Our Lane, which are as follows: An 8" water line meeting City standards from Randol Mill to the southwest corner of the property will be installed by the property owner or builder prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant acknowledges that the City will not maintain Our Lane and that it is the responsibility of the property owners to maintain Our Lane to a level that will allow fire trucks to respond to emergencies. f ' xuw rmEvu �a .wela�ax 3i `4 - yy �pp � ¢alien yml ❑� s � (SM 18LB�WATER�ISDR¢8 WD,C®007 L=---J Johnson s Addklon r 1 I OUR LANE HISTORY • The property was annexed into the City in 1987 and given the "AG" Agricultural zoning designation. • A zoning change and concept plan (ZA13-083) for the property at 1730 Randol Mill Ave. from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential District was approved February 17, 2004. • A zoning change and concept plan (ZA06-049) for the properties to the west of the subject property located at 1801 and 1829 Our Ln. from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1 A" Single-Family Residential District was approved August 1 , 2006. • A plat showing (ZA08-008) for Lots 5 & 6, W. Martin No. 1068 Addition for the properties to the west was approved March 19, 2008 and filed April 30, 2008. • A zoning change and concept plan (ZA10-053) for the property at 1742 Our Ln. from "AG" Agricultural District to "SF-1 A" Single-Family Residential District was approved November 2, 2010. • A plat showing for Lot 7, W. Martin No. 1068 Addition for the property at 1742 Our Ln. was approved March 2, 2011 and filed April 7, 2011 . • r , r T - r-All VT 'y •r .I .,� i/' 'rr' ;'\ �� ' .1•i lks.! y���d1 1. �:.*'i t..y.+e:"�.�" t *'�:;.� H' ,i��3`r •' .M,r.:� +fin y� :i.:e '":�'r:?le. 1 ��� rt>..� \� - yA '1 .1+, - t '!�. �.i 1 �. ,F..•,,l 141 -,1 � /�(' F�;�,: � i-�`' _l. \ .r:[*, .{., :..(`,1j � ad�e",,.,� , '4".'.r✓: :�t;°Ir/�-.,s Y. :ie. ?" .2k>r,.���� .` ..`fie+. .��.... V h;. ,��' �.,.. ..lei 3ti- � A'....,4:• ,� i.. qi�!'�'�! ��'`� '�':v'�1 �`�.,,GI.I�A 11 1 `-'v..�i...f°r j '`.SA,yA,'•'tY�.t''i�ir♦ +� �x-.�' ,2*N� _°.;��"�„+r• k..t �1. 4 a rt.J.";`� ,'�krl'c .. K,.. Y r //..)fir. - '� 1 ?<'' �,k'i�l�� ��, � rr;.� � :'i ..' ."';"�,,;�.,�+a ,.J lk.za.. s;..+-s-�•••v; :+.t, _ _�„- ,.� , ?43� „�'.�."'� t�''.f:a' 1 0 tt:�U- Il, �I�,_.i.`1*� 1 ,d/r.' i �''i'; , � yy,•,r�.;1:� r t L�;�� !�"4"`.it.l `i:,`ae � �'��1`�r t - s y 1 S '��:�__ r J �! ?'•\ � !1 i'.JI,� �....� r r�� � - - z,., ,. yh '-r. W �,� '.r l As,,::r.,t ,fr kJ_n,t Ir,r ,� !t :�' ' sf_ .',,°1 L.it'��!h,r 'I.p , ,.,1[, ,...;^J�� ',;�1 ..�t�.1y'' a, .,, .!-`.•� 1:. ��� r^I i „J •a�.1..� -1 ''�1ti. � ',L t'�}}�d 1� ."`V!'../ f .�. 1 1 i � i R.;,:. ,� t r• r 1 3i .-I Y a "Ni I:} q y 1( �� r.� rah Ht�f..'�'.,-� ,X-Rd: ;, t�17�' I PI.'��!1.�1!, r 1;'.i.lo"1�\ 1 ,��f' ��'..Cr -'�,• a t'_, d 7.. � G'.-"" .,. �i ?i'P`'';�..�� �- '�'� ,�a ii 1',8 �.- -.�'s.'l'� ,l. :�. 2},`..f,! I���`�. � ��.4.• R i✓.,.:\ �. tir',fs. T�/ '�4 ` ;,1:` ht ..ih�'. 4 � :iY \. T. } .�`:� ?"��+�'�...-� :4�:�7 r 3QV. t.;n (.. t:�..� i 4 }r�"�!f[ �'J�� ,,;—. [ 11 '�i ` �- � t �•Y`�°v -q.�y �_ 4 Site Photo wC'-�,h ARA--W s• _ ) `.. - - ^..'4! Imo' �,:,,' y�i _ r 1 �.� �••�" •� ti. �n �.{'�� •sue 't: y�:y � M - ;, \ N 1 r l OL to • �?� �, �' �.. — - ,:� �-�. r. 1g �a N Other Items • Due to opposition within 200' of the property being in excess of 20% a supermajority vote of City Council is required. • City staff met with the applicant to discuss reimbursement agreements regarding providing existing homes in the subdivision access to the new water line. Legal • What is the impact on Council's vote as a result of 20% of the properties within 200' filing opposition to this zoning case (Supermajority)? • Can City Council make a condition of the zoning approval that the developer installing the 8" water line be required to hook the existing homes to the new line? • What is the city's role in any pro rats agreement? ZA1 3 =043 Planninq and Zoning► Commission July 18, 2013; Approved (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated May 31 , 2013 and the staff report dated July 12, 2013 and approving the variance request as follows; a) An 8" water line meeting City standards from Randol Mill to the southwest corner of the property will be installed by the property owner or builder prior to issuance of a building permit. b) The applicant acknowledges that the City will not maintain Our Lane and that it is the responsibility of the property owners to maintain Our Lane to a level that will allow fire trucks to respond to emergencies. ZA1 3 =043 City Council August 6, 2013; Approved at 1st reading (7-0) including the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission that the applicant will provide an eight inch fresh water line to the southwest corner of the property; applicant understands that the City will not be responsible for road maintenance along Our Lane; and asking the applicant work with city staff to discuss reimbursement agreements regarding access to the waterline for future permit applicants, providing water access to the eight inch line for the existing homeowners along Our Lane, discuss a possible cost-sharing agreement regarding road improvements to Our Lane and granting the variance to property not having access to a public roadway. CITY OF SOUTH AKE