Item 3 CITY Sou
OF
• Grapevi ne/South lake
Proposed Boundary
Adjustmenf
11111
� '• WWIF�; Grapevine City Limit Issue
� S��'�{����. +•�� � ,r � .l,.� • .. II .��.•,,�:�, legend
City Limit Boundary
it '.Y � '�. f 5u{F'•4 '+ - ..1 ����* �•`f AS ulhlake Parcel Bounda!,
e j•� ` '- t 7 diacenl City Parcel Lines
doh . • �' a ��`,
- -.` t :ram�r • fix
Wo
i 1 1 � •.•��•1 �I �.�Y ! :Sv.a.cn.
:1777
Integrity
Innovation
Commitment
r
1 _ �
,r •;;at ram.
to
Excellence �!. �r io -fall ' ;Y_�ui .,� �. `'r�� �•� i;"�.J
•' f '� rz f
CITYOF
0 Discussion Topics
• Background Information
• Grapevine Proposal
• Legal Issues
Integrity • Options_
Innovation • Council Discussion
Background Information
Primary
• Sanitary Sewer Service Provision
— Simmons Addition
— Grapevine Plaza =
Grapevine ProposalCITY
• •
Simmons Forest Addition
- Vicinity Map
J-2
RA�NT
W N
SH 114
CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
Sanitary Sewer Provisions
• Simmons Forest Addition
— Sept. 1998 Agreement Grapevine & Southlake
• 10-Year Agreement — Expired September 2008
• Grapevine to serve 40 Southlake residential lots
• Southlake to serve 40 Grapevine residential lots
— Current Status of Agreement
• Investigation yields 35 Southlake lots served by
Grapevine
• Need to be able to serve all of the area (49 lots)
• Septic service not an option for lots in floodplain
ti
00
Current Sewer Accounts
QSimmons Forest&Rainforest Vicinity
Cglor rest Only.jpg
Lots currently
being developed
' I
Legend
Current Sewer Account
No SewerAccount
Vacant
Elm-
E•■N■■
■
11\
EXCLUSIVE "
r�
_ ,ads• _"
Sanitary Sewer Provisions
• Grapevine Plaza Addition
— June , 1990 Agreement
• 5-year term
• Grapevine provides sewer to :
— Lots 1 -3
— Grapevine Plaza Addition (Blockbuster, Cici's
Pizza, etc)
— Current Status: Expired
ELL
• Grapevine still providing service
Grapevine Proposal
"Continue sewer service to Southlake
as needed, with agreed upon limits, in
the event a boundary adjustment
could be mutually agreed upon. "
Proposed Bou ndary Adj ustment
-kTo MI'l
1.1 M, V
�IV
a
0o
vs
9.1
T
lot
5. ;41
Flir
Propose-d=R-oAn-dary=Adjustment
log
- 1 *
Fi t ♦ aAc 4 '
LAND AREAS
r
UNDEVELOPED AREA& 1.728c '"
AUSTIN OAKS DRIVE :�. _ '. .•. er
DEV ELOPED AREA& 5.158c �"
PARKING AREA - '� - !� • ¢ ±' :
T3 DOT ROW AREA 11.35ac y zy1 •_ ,s ti s ! !
TOTAL 18.228c
f-
Adjustment Area
ILL
L ..............
�- - • ...............
F
ICITY OF
S
SOUTHLAKE
Proposed Agreement Terms
• Sewer Agreement for Simmons Addition (99
years)
• Adjust boundary to eliminate out parcels
• Inter-local agreement for construction of Kimball
per Southlake IVITIP (GV cost = $2 ,000,000)
• Share cost of emergency water connection/
meter at Austin Oaks entrance
• Grapevine to purchase SL water line (reduced
for age)
� Agree to future Nolen Drive connection
Proposal Pros & Cons
• Sanitary Sewer Service Provision
• Taxissues
• Public Safety Service
• Redevelopment Considerations
Proposal Pros and Cons
- Sewer Service
• PROS
— Construction Cost Avoidance ($ 1 , 185,000*)
• Not required to construct 2 lift stations and force mains
— Reallocate Utility Fund CIP budgeted dollars
— Maintenance & utility cost avoidance
— Could serve remaining developed and undeveloped
lots
• CONS
— Service to Southlake residents provided through
interlocal agreement Costs
Simmons Addition
Cost to Sewer
Requires Use of Lift Station
— Construction of New Lift
Station
— Use of Existing Grapevine Lift
Station
Req of
uires n.
Force Main
Probable
Agreement Grapevine
for of Station
E&L--
CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
Sanitary Sewer Service
Map of Simmons Forest Addition
1 E.:al --?CrO
y of€c"vir*❑CV6 Rc LIM '3falfian
Existing City of lGrx*wirh&0I'a'+G1Y Six er • 4 RX>ILD
y+ i
' 's_. .-�.�•� � -tr ,� �*-tit#� �,' '�# �
LO., - e
or
4E T I". TiN + �
ExisLng Shady Lane Lift Gwtibr
847h1TFF ems-:
■ TIP
'vOnn 1.o Exi"Groyny;7 r:ri r�; - ~ -0 4`4 1.
r
a
s
rYp,
_ .w
Grapevine Plaza
Cost to Sewer
• Sewer back to the west
(Gateway Plaza)
• Probable Cost
- $580,000 (2007 costs
— Requires SH 114 bore -4 �
— Requires TxDOT utility
permit
Sanitary Sewer Service
Map of Grapevine Plaza
�Akh�4L-.
IL
Ip
i
Ff aT �rr'� � � � -.�5o Ro.�■• 'mot _
F F
ti t - �-
.r
Qxv*d to,,m YC! sawiw
4
T. y 1 `
r
� r
Proposal Pros and Cons
- Tax & Financial Impacts
• PROS
— Tax revenues in the study area are limited
— Clarifies confusing tax allocation & collection
• CONS
— Permanent adjustment to boundary
— Concedes future tax revenue
• OTHER
— Financial payback period
• Assumes $1 .2 — 1 .4 million
li6 • 20 years at 5%
• Pay back period = 39 years
Proposal Pros and Cons
- Public Safety
PROS- Fire & EMS Calls
— Proposed boundary 2002 85wi
preferred to lessen 2003 6 qfe d
confusion 2004 4
— Little to no impact on 2005 2
DPS issues
— Fire & EMS Calls 2006 8
2002-2007 = 31 total 2007 3
(Se e ch )
Proposal Pros and Cons
- Public Safety ( cont. )
— Police Police Calls
-5 Businesses 2006 15 � 010td;(Y
— Police Calls 2007 7 , gti':'ly,`� �
2006-2007= 22 total
(See Chart) r.Pr�n�
• Cons - None
CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE
To Move Forward
Legal Agreements Required
• Inter-local Agreement - legal process for
boundary adjustment
• Inter-local Agreement for construction of Kimball
Road
• Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement — Simmons
Addition
Proposal Pros and Cons
- Redevelopment
• PROS
— Likely no near-term redevelopment
— Difficult due to one owner of both GV & SL
portions
— Potential future cloverleaf at intersection ,
reducing redevelopment ease of access
• CONS
— Potentially fast-food along access road in
future, but unlikely due to not being
114 frontage road IN
Options
• Approve negotiated proposal
• Modify proposal
• Reject proposal ; Install sewer
Discussion
CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE