Loading...
Item 9 - Mobility Plan Draft 10-29-2021 DRAFT 10-29-2021 City of Southlake Mobility Master Plan An Element of the Southlake 2030 Comprehensive Plan Adopted by Southlake City Council Ordinance No. 2021 Prepared by Planning & Development Services Department and Public Works Department �+ ENVISION SOUTHLAKE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SOUTHLAKE CITY COUNCIL PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION John Huffman Daniel Kubiak Mayor Chairman Chad Patton Michael Forman Mayor Pro Tem Vice Chairman Randy Williamson Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Michael Springer Kathy Talley Gina Phalen Place 1 Randy Robbins Craig Rothmeier Place 2 Ronell Smith Scott Dyche Place 4 Amy Torres-Lepp Austin Reynolds Place 5 CITY STAFF Rob Cohen, P.E. Shana K.Yelverton Director of Public Works City Manager Kevin Ferrer, P.E. Alison Ortowski Deputy City Engineer Assistant City Manager Kevin Taylor, P.E. Ken Baker,AICP Civil Engineer Senior Director of Planning&Development Services Bryan Ahumada Dennis Killough,AICP Engineer in Training Deputy Director of Planning& Development Services Patrick Whitham Jennifer Crosby,AICP GIS Analyst Strategic Initiatives Principal Planner TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION IMPORTANCE OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 1 RELATIONSHIP TO SOUTHLAKE'S STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 2 PURPOSE AND RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3 Exhibit 1: City of Southlake Strategy Map 4 GOALS & OBJECTIVES OF THE MOBILITY MASTER PLAN 5 8 BACKGROUND LOCATION, CHARACTER & RESOURCES 8 DEMOGRAPHICS 9 MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 12 14 THOROUGHFARES REGIONAL TRENDS 16 FUNCTIONAL ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS 17 STREET DESIGN STANDARDS 22 Exhibit 2:Master Thoroughfare Plan 30 INTERSECTION STUDIES 31 TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES 34 STREET LIGHTING STANDARDS 39 ILLUMINATED STREET SIGNAGE 40 ACCESS MANAGEMENT 40 MAP 41 THOROUGHFARE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS (SEE APPENDIX) 42 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 42 HISTORY OF ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION IN SOUTHLAKE 42 REGIONAL PLANNING 43 MOVING FORWARD 44 BICYCLE FACILITIES 47 Exhibit 3:Bicycle Facility Master Plan 53 BICYCLE FACILITY MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS (SEE APPENDIX) SIDEWALK FACILITIES 54 Exhibit 4: Pathways Master Plan 57 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION PRIORTY LIST (SEE APPENDIX) ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS (SEE APPENDIX) CROSSWALKS 58 61 IMPLEMENTATION, PRIORITIZATION AND EVALUATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 61 PRIORITIZATION SCHEDULE 61 62 APPENDIX A: Level of Service (LOS) Descriptions 64 APPENDIX B: South Village Center Drive Guidelines 95 APPENDIX C: Summary of all Southlake 2035: Mobility Master Plan Recommendations [SOUTHLAKE 2035, •• ' INTRODUCTION 4 > rn h _— `i Continental Boulevard One of the most important issues for Southlake citizens is transportation. Transportation is vital to the quality of life and economic viability of the community. The City of Southlake Mobility Master Plan is a comprehensive plan for transportation systems that will serve the mobility needs of residents, businesses, and visitors and will guide transportation investments. It is multimodal —that is, it addresses mobility needs for vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians. The purpose of the Mobility Plan is to identify the transportation needs of the City. It identifies the future transportation network that will be needed to serve the projected population and employment growth and increased travel demand. The Plan identifies policies, programs and projects for implementation and development and guides funding decisions. The Plan is divided into the following sections: 1. Introduction 2. Background 3. Thoroughfares 4. Active Transportation 5. Implementation, Prioritization and Evaluation IMPORTANCE OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING The transportation system forms one of the most visible and permanent elements of a community.Accordingly, the Mobility Plan establishes the framework for the community's growth and development and, along with the Future Land Use Plan, forms a long-range statement of public policy. By incorporating programmed land uses and densities of the Future Land Use Plan, strategies can be developed that maximize the land use / transportation relationship. As Southlake experiences further residential and commercial growth and approaches build-out, transportation facilities and internal movement become greater concerns. Accessibility to industrial and commercial areas, residential neighborhoods, schools, recreation centers and other traffic generators is essential in creating a transportation system that will move goods, services and people efficiently, conveniently and safely. • [SOUTH LAKE 2035] 1 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] In order to support land-use activities, Southlake's ; transportation infrastructure must be planned to anticipate future traffic demand, minimize unnecessary traffic movement and establish a transportation system which adds to rather than detracts from the quality of life. The direct relationship between land use and transportation is complex; different land uses generate varied intensities of traffic that influence the demand for transportation systems, and transportation systems influence the development of land use activities. Recognizing this inter-relationship, there must be a / coordinated, continuing and comprehensive effort in South Peytonville Avenue planning transportation systems and land use. Any transportation system planned should balance the needs of the automotive mode of transportation and non- automotive modes of transportation. At a local scale, this includes bicycle and pedestrian modes and at a regional scale, rail, air, and other modes of travel. A truly multi-modal approach to transportation is required in order to address existing and future local and regional mobility and air quality challenges. Benefits of a well-planned intermodal transportation system include: ■ Efficient access to daily activities and services ■ Availability of transportation options ■ Improved environmental quality I ■ Improved personal health ■ Economic vitality and sustainability The major principles underlying this Master Plan are focusing on future development near existing transportation corridors, ensuring land uses are supported by an efficient local roadway network, supporting active modes of transportation such as walking and biking and ensuring that transportation options are maximized for all community members. Cotton Belt Trail along S.H.26 RELATIONSHIP TO SOUTHLAKE'S STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Strategic planning is an ongoing process where resources, critical concerns, community priorities and citizen needs are combined to produce both a plan for the future and a measure for results. More specifically, Southlake's Strategic Management System links the City's day-to-day activities to a comprehensive long-term strategy for public policy and management decisions. The Strategic Management System identifies Strategic Focus Areas and Objectives to guide effective and efficient resource allocation and provides benchmarks to assess performance. The Strategic Focus Areas and Objectives are driven by the City's Citizen Survey and are outlined in Exhibit 1: City's Strategy Map shown on page 4. The Strategic Management System guided the development of the Southlake 2035 Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives (VGO), which define a desired direction for growth in the City. As such, all recommendations in the • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 2 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' Southlake 2035 Plan are tied to at least one Strategic Focus Area from the Strategic Management System and at least one Citizen Satisfaction objective from the adopted Southlake 2035 Vision, Goals and Objectives. These recommendations guide the development of the Capital Improvements Program (a five-year plan for the purchase, construction or replacement of the City's physical PStr.teggic .na• _ ment System assets) as well as departmental business plans. In turn, the Capital Improvements Program and departmental business plans dictate the City's day-to-day activities and ensure the City is working to achieve the community's goals. Southlake 2035 Vision, Goals Objectives Further,the Southlake 2035 Comprehensive Plan assists the City Council, Boards and Commissions in decision-making by establishing a blueprint for the City's future. For example, the Planning&Zoning Commission and City Council use the Mobility Comprehensive Plan Elements Master Plan to evaluate requests related to roadways, sidewalks, and pathways to determine the community's needs and goals. Using the Plan as a guide helps to secure the community's vision for mobility. City Activities and Operations RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ' , 1 The Mobility Master Plan is a component of the Southlake 2035 Plan,the City's W1 comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan is a reflection of the community's values and serves as a blueprint for Southlake's future. More specifically, the comprehensive plan establishes a framework to coordinate the City's activities and to guide the City's decision-making for the next 20 T years. As such, the comprehensive plan and its components are updated on a regular basis. DThe Southlake 2035 Mobility Master Plan includes and updates three master Oplan elements: the Sidewalk Plan, the Pathways Plan, and the Mobility and 02 O 3 5 Master Thoroughfare Plan. The first Mobility Plan combining these elements, the Southlake 2030 Mobility Master Plan, was adopted in 2014. Combining these elements helps the City achieve a more complete and comprehensive mobility system by planning for all modes of transportation concurrently.The Mobility Master Plan will be utilized in setting priorities in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) planning process, updating relevant ordinances and policies, and creating new mobility-related ordinances or policies as needed. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 3 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Exhibit 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE STRATEGY MAP The City of Southlake provides municipal services that support the highest quality of life for our residents,businesses,and visitors. We do this by being an exemplary model of balancing efficiency,fiscal responsibility,transparency,and sustainability. CRITICAL fety BUSINESS OUTCOMES strong financial City's commercial tax position and base by attracting high • • implement plans and quality new b us inesses Cl Achieve the C2 Provide travel C3 Provide attractive C4 Attract&keep top- CS Promote C6 Enhance the sense of policies to ensure to reduce the taxhighest standards convenience &unique spaces for tier businesses to drive a opportunities for community by providing excellent future financial burden on residential of safety& within City& enjoyment of dynamic&sustainable partnerships& customer service and citizen strength. taxpayers. security region personal interests economic environment volunteer involvement engagement opportunities :. :. mobility through quality of life through aggressive traffic progressive 82 Collaborate with ide high rCity 83 Enhance:1=1 BS Enhance service select partners to services B6 Optimize use management implementation of quality of lifedelivery through continual L -. I implement service ustainable of technology initiatives and capital Southlake's s solutions vitality throu practices process improvement project Comprehensive Plan J implementation. recommendations. rF1 Adhere to financial management F2 Invest to provide&maintain high quality F3 Achieve fiscal wellness F4 Establish&maintain effective thoughtful planning maintain strong public principles&budget public assets standards internal controls to ensure continued safety to ensure a low I __ high quality crime rate and LW development that is effective emergency integrated well into response. • t r • r t • LS Ensure our people L2 Enhanceleadershi P L3 Attract,develop& LS Empower informed L6 Foster positive the current built understand the L4 Recognize&reward strategy&how they capabilities to deliver retain a skilled high performers decision-making at all employee ironment. contribute to it results workforce levels in the organization engagement Ordinance No.1075-C, [SOUTHLAKE 20351 4 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' GOALS & OBJECTIVES OF THE MOBILITY MASTER PLAN The Southlake 2035 Vision Statement expresses a desire for the City to continue to enhance its status as a desirable, attractive, safe, healthy, fiscally-sound, and economically and environmentally sustainable community. Mobility infrastructure plays a vital role in achieving this vision. Accordingly,the adopted Southlake 2035 Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives included several mobility-related goals and objectives as outlined below. These goals and objectives guided the development of this plan and its recommendations to ensure that local infrastructure will meet the mobility needs of future residents, businesses, and visitors. Goal 1:Quality Development Promote quality development that is consistent with the Urban Design Plan, well-maintained, attractive, pedestrian friendly,safe, contributes to an overall sense of place and meet the needs of a vibrant and diverse community. Objective 1.2 Create and preserve attractive pedestrian-friendly streets and pathways to encourage transportation alternatives to the automobile. Objective 1.4 Emphasize creativity and ensure environmental stewardship in the design of all development and public infrastructure, maximizing the preservation of desirable natural features such as trees,topography, streams,wildlife corridors and habitat. Objective 1.5 Promote unique community character through a cohesive theme by emphasizing urban design detail and performance standards for structures, streets, street lighting, landscaping, entry features, wayfinding signs, open spaces, amenities, pedestrian/automobile orientation and transition to adjacent uses. Objective 1.9 Strengthen street and landscape design standards to enhance the visual quality along major corridors. Objective 1.10 Continue to promote a strong working relationship with the Texas Department of Transportation to improve the appearance of bridges, embankments and entryways into the City. Objective 1.11 Ensure that city- and developer-provided infrastructure is functional, aesthetically well- designed, and integrated with the natural environment. Objective 1.12 Continue to strengthen the City's regulations to encourage effective signage that is appropriately designed and scaled to minimize adverse impacts on community aesthetics. Goal3:Mobility Develop an innovative mobility system that provides for the safe, convenient, efficient movement of people and goods,reduces traffic congestion,promotes energy and transportation efficiency and promotes expanded opportunities for citizens to meet some routine needs by walking or bicycling. Objective 3.1 Provide a safe and efficient streets and pathways network that allows travel to shopping areas, schools, parks and places of employment, reducing the need to travel on the City's major arterials (FM 1709, FM 1938, or SH 114) and minimizes cut-through traffic in residential neighborhoods. • E 0 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 5 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] ' Objective 3.2 Implement and promote a mobility system that addresses safety, design, comfort and aesthetic elements such as landscaping, crosswalks, railing, lighting, traffic-calming and signage in order to provide distinct character and functionality for the City. Objective 3.3 In accordance with a need identified by the Citizen Survey, provide and promote a continuous pedestrian pathways system that is user-friendly, efficient,safe,economical,and connect parks, shopping, schools, work and residential areas. Objective 3.4 Pursue opportunities to link Southlake's pathways to systems in adjacent cities and trails on the Corps of Engineers property. Objective 3.5 Develop a program to encourage the dedication of easements for pathway construction in accordance with the sidewalk priority plan and Capital Improvements Plan. Objective 3.6 Identify and prioritize the funding and construction of mobility system capital improvements projects according to the impacts on safety,system efficiency,costs,and maintaining acceptable levels of service. Objective 3.7 Increase safe bicycle mobility when reasonably possible. Objective 3.8 Continue to promote a strong working relationship with the Texas Department of Transportation to identify, design and implement projects that prevent or relieve congestion in the area. Objective 3.9 Continue to evaluate and improve upon the existing mobility system within the City, maintaining existing infrastructure, making required improvements and evaluating innovative ways to integrate transportation and land use. Objective 3.10 Obtain adequate right-of-way for future roadway corridors and improvements. Goal 5:Public Safety Establish and maintain protective measures and policies that reduce danger, risk or injury to property and individuals who live, work or visit the City. Objective 5.3 Ensure compliance with the stated standard of response coverage and industry guidelines through the provision of facilities, equipment, personnel and roadways. Objective 5.6 Enhance and promote public safety through public-private partnerships and utilization and training of volunteers. Objective 5.8 Develop and implement safety education programs that enhance the quality of life and safety in the community. Objective 5.9 Promote security of public buildings and infrastructure. Goal 6:Economic Development Create a diversified, vibrant and sustainable economy through the attraction and support of business enterprises and tourism meeting the vision and standards desired by City leaders. Objective 6.1 Promote the City both nationally and regionally as a great place to live, work, visit, shop and recreate. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 6 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Objective 6.3 Foster an environment that retains and supports existing businesses to ensure the sustainability of our existing tax base. Goal7:Sustainability Encourage the conservation, protection, enhancement and proper management of the natural and built environment. Objective 7.2 Promote public awareness and education on such sustainability issues as public health, energy and water conservation and overall environmental stewardship. Objective 7.6 Protect and enhance air quality in coordination with federal, regional and local agencies. Goal9:Partnerships Fully utilize and coordinate with the City's many partners to address issues facing the area, provide services and facilities,promote volunteerism,support events and programs and encourage economic growth. Objective 9.1 Partner with other government entities, non-governmental organizations and the North Central Texas Council of Governments to address regional and local issues. Objective 9.2 Continue mutually beneficial partnerships between the City and local school districts to explore the provision of facilities, services, technology, and other opportunities through open communication and close coordination. Objective 9.3 Continue active partnerships with non-profit organizations, civic groups and local businesses to create opportunities that benefit the community. Objective 9.4 Partner with local school districts to educate Southlake's youth in their municipality and seek youth input when planning the future of our community. Goal 10:Infrastructure Through sound management and strategic investment, develop, maintain, improve and operate public infrastructure that promotes health,safety and an enhanced quality of life for all members of the community. Objective 10.1 Ensure equitably-distributed and adequate services and facilities. Objective 10.2 Plan and program land acquisition and the installation of all essential public facilities to reasonably coincide with the need for such facilities. Objective 10.3 Identify and implement programs where costs may be shared by multiple agencies and/or developers. Objective 10.6 Maintain and enhance existing infrastructure and levels of service through the provision of timely maintenance, repair and replacement as needed. Objective 10.8 Provide a streetlight system for adequate illumination and a wayfinding signage system for pedestrian and driver safety where appropriate. In addition to the goals and objectives noted above, the recommendations of this plan also help implement other goals and objectives of the Vision, Goals& Objectives of the Southlake 2035 Plan. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 7 SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' BACKGROUND The citizens of Southlake, City staff, and the development community consider long-range planning to be one of the most fundamental functions undertaken by elected and appointed officials in this municipality.The Mobility Master Plan has undergone several iterations since it was initially adopted as the Major Thoroughfare Plan with the City's first comprehensive plan in 1969. Like any good plan, it has evolved and become more relevant with each examination. C11 �.,.`"'es� SOUTHLAKE SOUTHLAKE 2025 « . 1 Southlake 2025 Plan Mobility B Master R. Mare Plan Dim Fund.rW Clasvific•fian$at— °lR°ad-ys �N°hcwfMrerm a �+aa��o�rsue ss _ 1969 Major Thoroughfare Plan Southlake 2025:2005 Mobility&Master Thoroughfare Plan The current update to Southlake's Mobility Master Plan integrates the Master Thoroughfare Plan,Sidewalk Plan, and Pathways Plan, and provides additional considerations for bicycle facilities. Combining each of these elements will help the City achieve a more complete and comprehensive mobility system, planning for different modes of transportation. LOCATION, CHARACTER& RESOURCES Southlake is located in North Central Texas, DENTON situated 23 miles northeast of Fort Worth and 25 miles northwest of Dallas. Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport is only a few short miles to SOUTHLAKE TEXAS the southeast, and Lake Grapevine borders the city to the north. State Highway 114 runs A t 9iance diagonally through the middle of the City, Airport heading east through Las Colinas and into downtown Dallas and west toward the Alliance Airport corridor. + ,�innonal��� Frt4.,i The City of Southlake now consists of approximately 22 square miles of land and has • ., a' +F"" just over 31,000 residents. Throughout this time FORT WORTH ARUNGTON DALLAS the City has grown and become a premier Southlake Regional Map community in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan • E 0 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 8 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' area.The City's dedication to quality development,sound fiscal policies and effective strategic management has made it an exemplary community. Historically, Southlake's growth has always been automobile-oriented and characterized by large lot single-family development that was not pedestrian-oriented. This type of development coupled with the City's desire to maintain its rural character generally resulted in the omission of bike paths and sidewalks for practical and aesthetic reasons. However, as Southlake has transitioned from a rural community to a suburban city with numerous pedestrian-friendly destinations, the desire for active transportation options has grown. In order to continue this level of quality of life it is important to have a plan in place to meet the needs and demands of Southlake's residents while also considering the demands of the region. DEMOGRAPHICS Southlake experienced rapid population growth between 1990 and 2000. This was a 205 percent increase in population, among the highest in Texas during that period. With economic recession and less land available for residential development, this trend slowed significantly between 2000 and 2010. As a result, the City has developed more slowly in recent years and with less intensity than previously estimated.The ultimate build-out population, estimated at 34,188, could be reached in 2030. Demographic characteristics can help the City assess current and future needs for transportation facilities consisting of roadways, sidewalks, trails and bikeways. Demographic profiles depicting age and income provide snapshots of Southlake's current population, illustrate change over the past decade, and suggest trends for the future. 31,265 City of Southlake 27,710 Population 24,900 26,575 21,519 13,350 7,065 2,808 1980 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 • E 0 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 9 [SOUTHLAKE 2035' •• ' • ' • • • " ' 1 ' • • • • 7141 • 7,065 -- 13,350 89% ••i 21,519 61% •• 24,900 16% • i 26,575 7% • 27,710 4% FTMM 31,265 13% Source:NCTCOG and US Census Bureau (2000 US Census,2010 US Census,2020 US Census,American Community Survey, NCTCOG Annual Population Estimates) Population by Age (2000-2010) 85+ 42 2000 Population 162 75 to 84 205 2010 Population 375 65 to 74 417 1023 55 to 64 1320 3,296 45 to 54 4,209 6,352 35 to 44 5,198 4,029 25 to 34 1,310 963 20 to 24 � 390 625 15 to 19 1,761 2,670 10 to 14 2,512 3,186 5 t0 9 2,523 2,511 Under 5 1,632 i 1,383 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035 10 SOUTHLAKE 20351 •• ' ' • • • • � 111 1 1 111 111 1 1 1 1 • - 21,519 100% 26,575 100% 23.5% 10,792 50.2% 13,313 50.1% 23.4% 10,727 49.8% 13,262 49.9% 23.6% 1,632 8% 1,383 5% -15% • 2,523 12% 2,511 9% -0.5% 1 . 2,512 12% 3,186 12% 27% • 1,761 8% 2,670 10% 52% 1 390 2% 625 2% 60% • 1,310 6% 963 4% -27% • 5,198 24% 4,029 15% -23% • 4,209 20% 6,352 24% 51% • 1320 6% 3,296 12% 150% • 417 2% 1023 4% 145% • ' 205 1% 375 1% 83% 42 0.2% 162 0.6% 1 286% • 7,978 37% 7,080 27% 14% 664 3% 1,560 6% 135% The 2010 census identifies 35-44 and 45-54 year Aye olds as predominant age groups in the City of Southlake, while nearly one-third of the I, population is less than 18 years old. Between 2000 and 2010, the City saw a decrease in the population of children under 10, 25-34 and 35- 44 year olds,and an increase in youth 15-19,45- - 54 and 55-64 year olds. Both the youth and the _ adult populations in Southlake are generally `- - older than they were a decade ago. Looking toward the next 10 to 20 years,it is possible that the number of adults over 65 may increase significantly, depending on patterns of migration. Likewise, as new residential development slows and the City reaches build out,the number and percentage of young children in the City may continue to decline. This would ultimately impact the City's transportation systems by developing mobility options that are more oriented towards an older demographic. The average household income will also play a critical role in the type of mobility options the City provides. From the 2000 census to the 2010 census the amount of households which earned over $200,000 dollars per year more than doubled. In addition, approximately 81%of households in the City had an income level of more than $100,000. What this translates to is that the preferred primary mode of transportation in the City is likely the automobile. Active transportation facilities such as sidewalks and bikeways would more than likely serve for recreational or leisure activities rather than commuting to work. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 11 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 1 •• ' Household Income (2000-2010) $200,000 or more 1,529 0 3,337 $150,000 to$199,999 1,129 1,521 $100,000 to$149,999 1,691 JA1bL 1,354 $75,000 to$99,999 ;�426 6 721 $50,000 to$74,999 660 $35,000 to$49,999 220 174 $25,000 to$34,999 182 1 83 $15,000 to$24,999 152 152 2000 Households $10,000 to$14,999 147 2010 Households ■ 128 Less than$10,000 91 135 • • • • 111 1 1 111 111 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 111 91 1% 135 2% 48% 1 1 1 1 • ' ' ' 47 0.7% 128 2% 172% 152 2% 152 2% 0% 1 1 1 • ' ' ' 182 3% 83 1% -54% 1 1 1 • ', ' ' ' 220 3% 174 2% -21% 1 1 1 1 • ' ' ' 660 10% 426 6% -36% 1 1 1 • ', ' ' ' ' ' 721 11% 386 5% -47% FOR OR In.ME ' ' ' ' 1,691 26% 1,354 18% -20% 1 fit • ' ' ' ' ' 1,129 18% 1,521 20% 35% 11 111 0 0 1,529 24% 3,337 43% 118% • - $131,549 $182,237 39% Source:US Census Bureau(2000 US Census,2010 US Census) • • [SOUTHLAKE 2035 12 SOUTHLAKE 2035 MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT A j®®* A Southlake Program for the Involvement of Neighborhoods (SPIN) meeting was held to solicit A®SPIN®R public input. The SPIN forum fosters open and timely communication between the citizens and J* ® city government regarding programs and issues affecting the quality of life in the community. ® This forum encourages positive relations and a stronger sense of community. In addition, both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council held public hearings for the Mobility Master Plan prior to adopting Ordinance No. 1075-C in November and December 2021. In summary, the approval process for the Mobility Master Plan was as follows: 1) SPIN meeting , , 'j 2) Planning&Zoning Commission recommendation 3) City Council 1st reading 4) City Council 2nd reading(final plan approval) • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 13 SOUTHLAKE 2035] THOROUGHFARES A Thoroughfare Plan is a city's long-term system plan for its street network. It is the municipality's adopted general plan for guiding thoroughfare system improvements, including the existing and planned extension of city streets and highways.The thoroughfare system is comprised of existing and planned ' freeways, expressways, and major streets and highways, which require wider or new rights-of-way and may ultimately be developed as four-lane, six-lane, or wider roadways. The o primary objective of the thoroughfare plan is to ensure the reservation of adequate right-of-way on appropriate alignments and of sufficient width to allow the orderly and efficient expansion and improvement of the thoroughfare system to N. KimballAvenue serve existing and future transportation needs. Also, the Thoroughfare Plan conveys the ultimate roadway system to ., ; � residents and businesses which helps them in making 71 investment decisions. ' Some of the benefits provided by effective thoroughfare planning are itemized below: • Reservation of adequate rights-of-way for future long- range transportation improvements; --- • Making efficient use of available resources by designating and recognizing the major streets that will Carroll Avenue-Federal Way Intersection likely require higher design of improvements; • Minimizing the amount of land required for street and highway purposes; • Identifying the functional role that each street should be designed to serve in order to promote and maintain the stability of traffic and land use patterns; • Informing citizens of the streets that are intended to be developed as arterial and collector thoroughfares,so that private land use decisions can anticipate which streets will become major traffic facilities in the future; • Providing information on thoroughfare improvement needs which can be used to determine priorities and schedules in the city's capital improvement program and capital budget;and, • Minimizing the negative impacts of street widening and construction on neighborhood areas and the overall community, by recognizing where future improvements may be needed and incorporating thoroughfare needs in the city's comprehensive planning process. The Thoroughfares section includes street classifications and cross-sections to describe the ultimate build out for all roadways within the City of Southlake. This enables the City to acquire necessary right-of-way during the development process, and it includes recommendations related to roadways to help the City prioritize investment in transportation projects. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 14 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' While cross-sections and recommendations in the Thoroughfares section reference pedestrian and bicycle facilities as part of a complete and integrated system, the emphasis is primarily on mobility for motorized vehicles. Information related to bicycle or pedestrian facilities are covered in the Active Transportation section of this master plan. In the 2019 Citizen Survey, questions were included to assess performance for mobility and infrastructure both on a broad,strategic level as well as in specific areas such as traffic circulation, roadway maintenance,water and sewer service, sidewalks and drainage. During this survey, there were several roadway construction projects underway that may have influenced residents' feelings about mobility; nevertheless, it demonstrates the importance of mobility within the community. Further, the survey indicates that Southlake has shown improvement in managing traffic congestion compared to 2019. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CITY'S PERFORMANCE IN THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: PROVIDING TRAVEL CONVENIENCE WITHIN THE CITY? (Q 1 O) Figure 54-City Performance: Mobility and Infrastructure Customer-Level Objective Excellent Very • • • 1 • • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 15 [SOUTHLAKE 20351 PERFORMINGHow WELL IS THE CITY THE NEEDS OF SOUTHLAKE RESIDENTS? *Managing Traffic Congestion 53% 43% Providing Pedestrian Pathways,Sidewalks,And Trails 32% 32% Responding to Code Enforcement Inquiries/ 19% ■2019 Complaints 27% Providing Information On Development 17 i9% 1 1 Providing Animal Control Services 24 Indicates significant 19% I change at 95%confidence level when 2019 results Managing Storm-Water Drainage 15%% i are compared with 2017. 1 GAP THRESHOLD: ANY SERVICE WITH A Maintaining Local Streets And Roads 18% i 25°b OR HIGHER GAP IS IDENTIFIED FOR 16% 1 PRIORITIZATION Providing Senior Services 14% 1 15% Preparing The City For Emergencies 14% 20%I REGIONAL TRENDS According to the North Central Texas Council of Government's Mobility 2045, the Dallas-Fort Worth area is the 4th largest metropolitan area in the United States and has a population larger than 37 states. Dallas-Fort Worth represents 30%of Texas' economy and is the sixth largest retail market in the United States. Between 2018 and 2045, the region is expected to experience a 51% increase in population (forecast of 11.2 million people) and a 47% increase in employment(forecast of 7 million jobs). With the anticipated level of growth, extending roadways and adding lanes in existing corridors will not provide enough capacity to address increased demand. In addition, transportation funding 0000 levels are not expected to increase(and may decrease)in the coming years. Transportation revenues are declining due to inflation, rising construction costs, and increasing fuel efficiency (resulting in obili� reduced fuel taxes). NCTCOG estimates that $390 billion would be y needed to eliminate the worst levels of congestion in the DFW 2045 region through 2045. However,only approximately$136.4 billion in resources have been identified to fund transportation improvements; about $51 billion of these resources address roadway project needs. By 2045, NCTCOG forecasts a 59% increase in average travel time in congested conditions (compared to 41% in 2018). In order to address increasing • E 0 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 16 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' congestion, the Mobility 2045 emphasizes programs and projects aimed at eliminating or reducing vehicle trips and utilizing the capacity of the existing transportation system to its fullest. Mobility04Goals: • Improve the availability of transportation options for people and goods. • Support travel efficiency measures and system enhancements targeted at congestion reduction and management. • Ensure all communities are provided access to the regional transportation system and the planning process. • Preserve and enhance the natural environment, improve air quality, and promote active lifestyles. • Encourage livable communities which support sustainability and economic vitality. • Ensure adequate maintenance and enhance the safety and reliability of the existing transportation system. • Pursue long-term sustainable revenue sources to address regional transportation system needs. • Provide for timely project planning and implementation. • Develop cost-effective projects and programs aimed at reducing the costs associated with constructing, operating, and maintaining the regional transportation system. FUNCTIONAL ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS Southlake has adopted the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) functional roadway classifications, which groups roadways into classes, or systems, according to the character of the traffic service that they are intended to provide. This functional classification system then provides a framework for the design standards for specific roadway cross sections. --- The FHWA functional classification system of roadways groups all streets into one of the three highway functional classifications listed below, depending on the character of the traffic and the degree of land access allowed. The classifications range from arterials,which are meant for higher speed, longer distance, larger volume travel, unhindered byAIM --�- local access, to local streets, which carry smaller volumes at lower speeds, and are intended to feed other streets. In ' between arterials and local streets are collector streets. A collector street collects traffic from local streets and feeds the arterial system. • r � u � The City of Southlake also uses a fourth roadway classification s for State Highway 114. Freeways are limited access arterials that are uniquely designed for higher speeds. As such, State Highway 114 provides Southlake residents a fast and easy connection to otherwise distant areas of the Metroplex. } • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 17 SOUTHLAKE 2035] ' Proportion of Service r Mobility Provides the highest level of service at the greatest speed for a the longest uninterrupted distance with some degree of access control. Provides a less highly developed level of service at a lower 0 Collector speed for shorter distances by collecting traffic from local roads and connecting them with arterials. Land Access Consists of all roads not defined as arterials or collectors; 0 Local primarily providing access to land with little or no through movement. Freeways A freeway is a controlled access major arterial designed to carry Freeway high volumes of through traffic. Access to and from the freeway Arterial is allowed at ramps and interchanges. These facilities are Collector and Through designed to permit high-speed merging and diverging maneuvers Traffic hDistribu tor with minimum disruption to the mainline traffic. Freeways have Movement Local and Speed maximum traffic carrying capacity but minimum access to adjacent property. Traffic capacities are generally from 60,000 Access to Property — 0 to 200,000 vehicles per day (vpd). Freeways generally serve inter-regional as well as local trips. They are ordinarily designed and constructed by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). Freeways connect major activity centers in a metropolitan region. Intersections are completely grade separated and there is no pedestrian or bicycle access. Buildings are not oriented directly to the freeway, however,they may be oriented towards the highway access roads. Some elements of parkway design are to be incorporated in the freeway design. S.H. 114 in the City of Southlake is the only roadway that would qualify as a freeway. Significant urban design f ,' r�l recommendations, including highway landscaping,treatment of overpasses,and portal designs for S.H. 114 are discussed further .;:';'. in the Urban Design Plan. v. Freeway frontage roads provide a means of connecting the local arterials to the freeways and provide controlled access to adjacent property. On frontage roads, trip length is generally a less than one mile. • E 0 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 18 SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' Arterial Streets Arterials are designed to provide a high degree of mobility and low generally serve longer vehicle trips to, from, and within urban areas. The arterial system interconnects major urban elements such as the Central Business District, industrial facilities, large _ urban and suburban commercial centers, major residential areas, and other key activity centers. Increased mobility, or the movement of people and goods, rather than access to adjacent land uses, is the primary function of an arterial street. Arterial streets serve a citywide function southlake Boulevard(FM 1709) and are, therefore, designated using a broader citywide perspective. Arterials are not planned on a neighborhood level since the result would be discontinuity and a breakdown in the street's citywide or regional function. Posted speed limits on arterial facilities generally range between 35 and 50 mph, varying based on the type of area being served. Arterial streets through compact central business =: districts accommodate the lower end of the speed range, while ' u higher speeds are found on facilities in outlying areas. Traffic .F volume and capacity of an arterial street are dependent, in part, Randol Mill Avenue(FM 1938) on the number of through and turning lanes, signalization, the number of driveways and access points, and the volume of bus and truck traffic. The volumes and capacity of arterials can range from 10,000 vehicles per day on a two-lane arterial to 75,000 vehicles on a six-lane arterial. With an emphasis on mobility, an arterial facility is generally designed to accommodate vehicle trips in the form of passenger cars and trucks. Pedestrian facilities and,when possible, bicycle facilities should be integrated into the design of these roadways. Arterial Street Designation Criteria The criteria for arterial street classification are a combination of quantitative and subjective measures that are applied to both existing and future characteristics of arterial streets. Not all of the criteria need to be met in designating an arterial street, and some criteria carry more weight than others.The following criteria are listed in order of relative importance or weight: • Consists of a grid of streets generally spaced at 1 to 1.5 mile intervals; • Serves as a significant street citywide, accommodating trips of 2-5 miles between destinations; • Provides connectivity between other arterials and collectors; • Provides connectivity between or to freeway interchanges; • Accommodates existing or future average daily traffic volumes of 10,000-75,000 (individual segments may accommodate lower volumes); • Provides significant restrictions on driveways and other access points to adjacent land uses; • Operates and is designated as an arterial street in adjacent jurisdictions; • Generally accommodates speeds of 30 mph or greater; • Provides traffic signals at major intersections and driveways as warranted; and • May accommodate 4 or more travel lanes. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 19 SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' Collector Streets Collectors are designed to provide a greater balance between r; mobility and land access within residential, commercial, and " industrial areas. The makeup of a collector facility is largely dependent upon the density, size, and type of abutting developments. Posted speed limits on collector facilities generally range between 30 and 40 mph. Traffic volume and capacity can range from 1,000 vehicles per day on a two-lane facility up to 10,000 vehicles per day on larger multi-lane - facilities. Emphasizing balance between mobility and access, a collector Johnson Road facility is designed to better accommodate bicycle and pedestrian activity while serving the needs of motorists. Rural roads are collectors that have a unique rural identity and - should be prioritized for preservation. These are typically 2-lane ;{ roadways with limited pedestrian/bicycle access, unimproved shoulders, and adjoining low-intensity residential or rural land uses. - Most rural roads in Southlake have mature trees or rolling pastures along the roadway. Where these streets need to �� accommodate more traffic, improvements shall be limited to Continental Boulevard addition of turn lanes at key intersections to address critical capacity needs. Flat curbs and surface drainage may be acceptable along most rural roads. Appropriate adjoining land use categories include low-density residential and rural conservation. Collector Street Designation Criteria The criteria for collector streets are a combination of quantitative and subjective measures that are applied to both existing and future characteristics of collector streets. Not all of the criteria need to be met in designating a collector street, and some criteria carry more weight than others. The following criteria are listed in order of relative importance or weight: • Serves as a locally significant street (accommodates trips of less than 2 miles distance between neighborhoods, or between destinations within the city); • Provides connectivity between arterials (e.g. connects parallel north-south or east-west arterials) or between other collectors; • Provides connectivity between important neighborhood activity centers such as commercial areas, schools, parks, and residential neighborhoods; • Accommodates existing or future average daily traffic volumes of 10,000 or less (individual segments may accommodate slightly higher); • Operates as and is designated as a collector street in adjacent jurisdictions; • Accommodates speeds of 30 mph or greater; • Provides limited restrictions on driveways and other access points to adjacent land uses; and • Provides no more than 2 travel lanes. • E 0 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 20 SOUTHLAKE 2035] ' Local Streets The design features of local facilities are influenced less by traffic volumes and are tailored more to providing local access and community livability. Mobility on local facilities is typically incidental and involves relatively short trips at lower speeds to and from collector facilities. Because of their"neighborhood" nature,travel speeds are generally lower than collectors and arterials. Posted speed limits on local streets should generally range between 20 and 30 mph, depending on available right-of-way and the adjacent land uses. Traffic volumes on local streets are generally less than 5,000 vehicles per day, and also vary Y depending on available right-of-way and the adjacent land uses. Pedestrian and bicycle safety and aesthetics are generally high — priorities on local streets in residential and commercial areas. Wider travel lanes and broader turning radii to accommodate .. ' larger vehicle size are important considerations on local streets in industrial areas. Typical Residential Street These streets provide primary access to adjoining commercial, industrial, and residential properties. They are typically 2 lanes, but may be up to 4 lanes with appropriate turn lanes. They are designed for low-speeds, and they accommodate pedestrian and bicycle access. On-street parking may be appropriate at some locations. Local streets in industrial areas , shall have appropriate accommodation for truck traffic, but proper screening and site design should be used to minimize the impact of off-street surface parking facilities on the _ adjacent roadway. _ } Main Streets are designed to be "destination" streets, and they function as centers of civic, social, and commercial Typical Main street activity. Main Streets are designed to provide the highest level of comfort, security and access for pedestrians. Developments along these streets are dense and focused toward the pedestrian realm. Buildings are generally pulled to the edge of the right-of-way with no or shallow setbacks. Land uses on Main Streets are typically mixed and are generators and attractors of pedestrian activity. Because of their specialized function and context, Main Streets will represent a relatively small portion of the City's overall street network. Such streets are appropriate in the Town Center and Employment Center -1 land use categories. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 21 SOUTHLAKE 2035] STREET DESIGN STANDARDS The following cross sections detail the ultimate build-out for each configuration of the functional classification system. These cross sections are recommendations only and specific site and context conditions may warrant changes to the sections. However,establishing street design standards assists the City in acquiring needed right- of-way and in achieving locally-appropriate urban design and establishing a distinct image for the Southlake.See the Recommended Roadway Network Map (Master Thoroughfare Plan) on page 29 to view the designation for public rights-of-way within the City. ArterialsAO An • - • Freeway A6D 'W C2U 'W Main Street 300'—500' ROW 124'—130'—140' ROW 60'—70'—84' ROW 50'—60' ROW 6 lane divided 2 lane undivided 2 lane undivided A51.11 Commercial/Residential 80'—90' ROW 50'—60' ROW 5 lane undivided 2-4 lane divided/undivided A4D 88'—100' ROW 4 lane divided A3U ROW 3 l 3 lane undivided A2U Mum 88' ROW 2 lane undivided 300'—500' 6-lane divided freeway with 3-lane frontage road in both directions Design Freeway: 50-70 mph Frontage Roads:40 mph 12' Design Characteristics Limited access to and from the freeway, View of S.H. 114 allowed only at ramps and interchanges. ■ Intersections are completely grade separated. ■ No direct pedestrian or bicycle access. Recommended 8'sidewalk parallel to frontage roads. ■ No parking permitted. ■ Buildings are not oriented directly toward the freeway, however,they may be / oriented toward the frontage roads. - -mmA • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 22 SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility MasterPlan Freeway Cross Section MA 96&�"1 mo � ! ima INUM'Mr • 124'-130'-140' 6-lane divided arterial 45-50 mph Minimum Lane Width 11' Design Characteristics Limited driveway access to improve mobility. ■ Improved visual appeal with landscaping and street trees,as allowed by TxDOT. ■ Improved pedestrian connectivity with 5'-10' pathways on both sides of the street. ■ Recommended for pathways to be multi-use. ■ Recommended pavement treatment and crosswalks at signalized intersections. ■ Highly controlled access. Recommended for adjoining uses to share driveways and provide cross access easements. ■ No on-street parking permitted. Minimize the visual impact of off-street parking with vegetative fences,berms,or relocation of parking to the side or rear of buildings. ■ Buildings are set back but provide visual orientation toward the street. mom ■ Signalization,as warranted,at major interections. .)Cross Section Boulevardoil Views of Southlake • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 23 SOUTHLAKE 2035 Arterial 80'—90' • 5-lane undivided arterial Design 35-40 mph • 11' Limited driveway access to improve mobility. ■ Improved visual appeal with landscaping and street trees. ■ Improved pedestrian connectivity with 5'-8' pathways on both sides of the street. ■ Recommended for pathways to be multi-use to accommodate bicyclists off-street due to speed differentials. ■ Recommended pavement treatment and crosswalks at signalized intersections. ■ Highly controlled access. Recommended for adjoining uses to share driveways and provide cross access easements. ■ No on-street parking permitted. Minimize the visual impact of off-street parking with vegetative fences,berms,or relocation of parking to the side or rear of buildings. ■ Buildings are set back but provide visual orientation toward the street. View of N orth Nolen Drive 7. I ) , Right- ■ • 88'-100' • 4-lane divided arterial Design 35-40 mph WidthMinimum Lane 11' Improved visual appeal with landscaping and street trees. ■ Improved pedestrian connectivity with 5'-10' pathway on one side of the street and a minimum 4' pathway on the opposite side. ■ Recommended for wider pathways to be multi-use to accommodate bicyclists off- street due to speed differentials. Consider a road diet to reduce width travel lanes and add on-street bike lanes. ■ Recommended crosswalks at 4-way intersections. ■ Controlled access due to medians. Recommended for adjoining uses to share driveways and provide cross access easements. ■ Minimize the visual impact of off-street parking with appropriate screening. ■ Buildings are set back but provide orientation toward the street. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035 24 SOUTHLAKE 2035 Mobility MasterPlan 1 Cross Sectionof • Kimball Right-of-Way 70' • 3-lane undivided arterial 30-35 mph • 11' Improved visual appeal with landscaping and street trees. ■ Improved pedestrian connectivity with 5'-8' pathways on both sides of the street. ■ Recommended crosswalks at 4-way intersections. ■ No on-street parking permitted. ■ Buildings are set back but provide orientation toward the street. lei Arterial Mqw Right-of-Way88' • 2-lane undivided arterial 30-35 mph WidthMinimum Lane 11' Design Characteristics Improved visual appeal with landscaping and street trees. ■ Improved pedestrian connectivity with 5'-10' pathway on one side of the street and a minimum 4' pathway on the opposite side. ■ Recommended for wider pathways to be multi-use. ■ Recommended crosswalks at 4-way intersections. ■ No on-street parking permitted. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 25 SOUTHLAKE 2035 •• • ' ■ Buildings are set back but provide orientation toward the street. ■ This cross-section represents the ultimate build-out,which would require significant underground drainage improvements. . r • 60' 70'-84' 2-lane undivided collector Design 30-35 mph Minimum Lane Width 11' C21J Cross Section ■ Recommended to retain existing natural landscape to the extent possible. ■ Improved pedestrian connectivity with minimum 4' pathways on both sides of the street. ■ Recommended crosswalks at 4-way intersections.Consider H It turn-lanes and roundabouts where appropriate. ■ Low access control. �� ■ Typically no on-street parking permitted. ■ Narrow lanes conducive to lower-speed traffic. ■ Buildings are set back but provide orientation toward the street. Typical C2U Streets a r -ate • [SOUTHLAKE 20351 26 SOUTHLAKE 2035 Mobility MasterPlan Local • 50'-60' 2 lane undivided local street Design Speed 20-25 mph • 10' Main Street Cross Section ■ Pedestrian orientation with street trees separating sidewalks from the roadway. ■ Improved pedestrian connectivity with 8'-10'sidewalks on both sides of the street. ■ Recommended traffic calming and narrow lanes conducive to , low speed traffic. ■ Parallel or angled on-street parking permitted. Minimize the visual impact of off-street parking with vegetative fences, berms,or relocation of parking to the side or rear of buildings. ■ Limited driveway cuts with parking areas accessed from alleys. ■ Buildings should be built close to the street and include pedestrian scale design features. Typical Main Streets Local • • xNamr— • 50'-60' • 2 lane undivided local street Design Speed 20-25 mph 10' Design Characteristics Residential/Commercial Street Cross Section ■ Pedestrian orientation with street trees separating sidewalks from the roadway. ■ Improved pedestrian connectivity with minimum 4' pathways on both sides of the street. ■ Recommended traffic calming and narrow lanes conducive to lower-speed traffic. ■ On-street parking permitted. ■ Buildings provide orientation toward the street,and may be brought to the street,as allowed by zoning • Lalk [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 27 SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' Typical Residential Street Typical Commercial Street 11 i- ki • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 28 • • Mobility Master Plan O O ' �1 Na 1 ■al P ► + � ► ► d/ ��►1 1��.-hsILYS► ■ ■ nal►ii■pllr ���ir' �'� '■T'�A��. M���1U1 ` tizd�1�cails3ii' r■Sur. c$+• L �y ,3'II{a 4 nn _!' r au■. e �1 m IIIIIIImiIIIIImmIIIII ♦ .r �10p1% 11 rA -.^• 7=�;saes Is�d .. NRIP 1 ���iliiii I IIII(11 p� 3?.......... �n■ 11 a•III r li a�^ I '- C�I► �a e■i�W �+t ,� �el�"'111h\\ii .'•�► 1 s _t,• r�Jli9iilla MINE,: � 1 I� ■ -r � 111I 1 111■C-.�■tl .- ,� .11�1�y1 �'n�---. y��+' �� i S �I ��rhni�i�1.1■enn �,v •■i' ..6. .-1 :,Q` sr� 'min, .. t s Yi �..�� 1 r — 1 : N-ts .�� 1■ L ter- ti 11�= 2 � 10 did Ill phi d e%IN 9'�= �an111111-I � � .d � ��� ■s����li�l {�{�f ''�'". + -�'`= �R ��iu51�11�� h�1 ���li� � I;d rN�y v �.• 71 FV 1 _ n_c ii' Y►I III ��<�. r y T�I 7 ►��ill,il�� � Win• C %%tl1 I r u• Jai 1 F" - - � I�i.I■1 i.A �nr. ��� �iin�iiiiif�n��►���iinn L� �nllm ■■■ i , Iie�4 .r 1.1.■sn■ni lr__ ,,.■: .. iir .�s 1..,,,,. j• .1 . SIR 63 Q. Inn n �S'••'•""u 1171111s - .i��i 1■14.." ILA - Ordinance No.1075-C,Adopted • I SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' INTERSECTION STUDIES The City strives for a level of service (LOS) of C or better at each of its major intersections, which means an average vehicle control delay of 20-35 seconds at signalized intersections or 15-25 seconds at unsignalized intersections. As new development occurs and traffic volumes increase, the level of service deteriorates. _ Multiple options may be available at these -= � a intersections to achieve the desired level of y service, and studies determine which improvements will be most effective and efficient. " In an effort to address the number one gap issue SH 114 and Dove Road from the 2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey, "Manage Traffic Congestion," the City contracted with Kimley-Horn to perform a traffic analysis for various key intersections throughout the City in 2016. N� The study entailed the engineering firm performing site inspections at key intersections during the AM and PM peak traffic periods to LOLL observe traffic conditions such as sight distance constraints, intersection operations and geometry, excessive queuing, and crosswalk locations. Following the site inspections, the engineering firm conducted a traffic analysis on S White Chapel Boulevard and Continental Boulevard the intersections which included traffic computer modeling and traffic signal warrant analysis. Based on the work described above, the engineering firm made traffic improvement recommendations for each of the intersections studied. Examples of the recommendations include adding additional turn lanes, signal retiming, improved crosswalks, better signage and adding roundabouts. In addition,the installation of traffic signals may be an appropriate solution in some locations. However, due to the expense for installing and maintaining signals, all signals must meet and be prioritized based on warrant studies.The following should be considered prior to signalization: 1) Warrant Study 2) Construction 3) Maintenance/Technician Service The following map and table show the intersections studied. The complete list of recommendations from the study, including 2021 updates, are included in the Appendix. • E 0 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 30 LSOUTHLAKE 2035 Mobility MasterPlan Intersection Capacity Analysis Map Legend t j � Souatlakr C.q LkrM 1 •��' Sgr"sao Irtar:rtbor n tbsr Proalmty -4- R&WO SWWIZaa IMaIWW Study Area Inbr•aKtlon• 1t7 19 • SgnNJaa Intraacton Unairalizso ntrast'on J 7+ O RwnCabo A w 'S to 1�.•, Srr`yc',, •St i zz�" 23 R1 1 ED r fM a ,! I ♦ _ a v �. r $ and""Mta B A 26 to Intersections I 1• r • • 1 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Pearson 16 Carroll Avenue and Zena Rucker Road Lane 2 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and 17 Kimball Avenue and Village Center Drive Watermere Drive /Jellico Circle (Two-way Stop Controlled) 3 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Davis 18 Dove Road and Peytonville Avenue Boulevard / Randol Mill Avenue (FM 1938) 4 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and 19 Dove Road and Shady Oaks Drive Peytonville Avenue (Northbound Stop Controlled) 5 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and 20 Dove Road and White Chapel Boulevard Southridge Lakes Parkway/Waterford Drive Peytonville Avenue/Southridge Lakes 6 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Shady 21 Parkway and Peytonville Avenue/ Raven Oaks Drive Bend Court (All Way Stop Controlled) Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and White Shady Oaks Drive and Highland Street/ 7 Chapel Boulevard 22 Turnberry Lane (All Way Stop Controlled) • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 31 SOUTHLAKE 2035 .. Carroll Avenue and Highland Street/ Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and 8 Diamond Boulevard / Byron Nelson Parkway 23 Kirkwood Boulevard (Two-way Stop Controlled) Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Tower Continental Boulevard and Davis Boulevard 9 Blvd 24 (FM 1938) 10 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Carroll 25 ContiAvenue ntal Boulevard and Peytonville Avenue (All Way Stop Controlled) Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Central Continental Boulevard and White Chapel 11 Avenue 26 Boulevard 12 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Village 27 Continental Boulevard and Byron Nelson Center Drive Parkway (All Way Stop Controlled) 13 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Kimball 28 Continental Boulevard and Carroll Avenue Avenue 14 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Nolen 29 Continental Boulevard and Kimball Avenue Drive 15 Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and 30 SH 114 Eastbound Frontage Road and State Commerce St/ Gateway Drive St. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035 32 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES Beyond the posted speed limit, the design of a street affects r the typical speed at which a motorist will feel comfortable driving.Traffic calming measures can reduce the travel speed on certain ROW to levels that are appropriate to the functional classification and adjacent land use. By slowing traffic, eliminating conflicting movements, and sharpening drivers' attention, traffic calming may result in fewer collisions. And, because of lower speeds, when collisions do occur, they may be less serious. : According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), I reducing speed and lowering the volume of traffic on -- appropriate streets have been shown to have a number of positive impacts: • Improved pedestrian and bicyclist safety. • Decreased traffic noise. • Improved neighborhood cohesion and livability. • Improved property values. Intersection Treatment • Improved street aesthetics and appearance. Traffic—calming techniques may also affect the following: • Crime reduction:Traffic calming encourages natural surveillance and access control. • Quality of street life: Lower speeds and volumes after traffic calming encourage walking, bicycling, and street life. Various types of traffic calming measures have been researched and recommended by the FHWA. Each may be appropriate under specific circumstances. Southlake has utilized medians, roundabouts, curb extensions, and corner radius treatments, but others may help to calm traffic near schools or parks, in neighborhoods or in certain commercial areas with high volumes of pedestrian or bike traffic. ✓r. As traffic calming is considered, it is also important to consider potential impacts on emergency personnel and Roundabout response times. Southlake could consider applying a combination of the following traffic calming measures in appropriate locations: • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 33 SOUTHLAKE 2035] Medians Medians are islands located along the roadway centerline, separating opposing directions of traffic movement. Medians can provide special facilities to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists, especially at crossings of major roadways. Medians are most valuable on major, multilane roads that present safety problems for bicyclists and pedestrians wishing to cross. The minimum central refuge width for safe use by those with wheelchairs, bicycles, etc., is 5.2 t feet to 6.6 feet. Introducing color or texture changes to y the road surface material around the refuge area reminds motorists to reduce speed. - Used in isolation, roadway medians do not have a significant impact in reducing vehicle speeds. For the purpose of slowing traffic, medians are generally used in conjunction with other devices such as curb extensions or roadway lane narrowing. Curb or midblock extensions The sidewalk and/or landscaped area on one or both sides of the road is extended to reduce the roadway to a single lane or minimum—width double lane. By reducing crossing distances, sidewalk widening can be used to make pedestrian movement easier and safer. They can be installed either at intersections or midblock,and they may be used in conjunction with other traffic— calming devices, but they cannot impede or restrict the operation of the roadway. Narrowing certain streets with curb extensions can create safer bicycle facilities, but care should be taken that bicyclists are not squeezed by overtaking vehicles where the road narrows. Corner—radius treatments Corner radii of intersection curbs are reduced, forcing turning vehicles to slow down. Efforts to accommodate trucks and other large vehicles have historically led to increased corner radii at intersections. To slow traffic, a corner radius of approximately 7 feet is recommended. The sharper turns that result from the reduced radii require motorists to reduce speed, increasing the time available to detect and take appropriate actions related to pedestrians at the crossing.Smaller radii also provide more pedestrian storage space, and pedestrians are more visible to drivers. Corner treatments may result in wide swings in turning movements of large vehicles, large vehicles hitting and damaging curbs or endangering pedestrians on corners, or affect response times for emergency vehicles. Locations for these treatments should therefore be carefully considered. Roundabouts Roundabouts are circular intersections that allow for a continuous flow of traffic in one direction around a center island. Roundabouts are intended to slow the speed and maintain efficiency at an intersection.They have been • E 0 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 34 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] ' proven to improve safety, reduce collisions, and reduce the injuries or impacts of collisions. Roundabouts in Southlake have been used at key intersections along arterials or collectors, and they provide opportunities for prominent landscaping and art to enhance the public realm. Traffic Circles Smaller traffic circles,with center islands approximately 13 feet in diameter,can be safer for both vehicles and pedestrians, reducing vehicle speeds.Traffic circles can reduce crashes by 50 to 90 percent when compared to two—way and four—way stop signs and other traffic signs, reducing the number of conflict points at intersections. Success, however, depends on the central island being sufficiently visible and the approach lanes engineered to deflect vehicles, preventing overrun of the island. Pavement Treatments/Intersection Treatments Textured pavement treatments provide visual and audible cues for drivers to encourage traffic calming.The use of paving materials such as brick, cobbles, concrete pavers, or other materials that create variation in color and texture reinforces the identity of an area as a traffic—restricted zone.Colors and textures that contrast with those prevailing along the roadway alert motorists to particular conditions, and increase bicyclist and pedestrian visibility. Treatments can be an attractive element along residential streets.The variation from asphalt or concrete paving can signify crossing into a residential zone where pedestrians and bicyclists can be expected to have greater priority. Pavement treatments can be combined with other traffic—calming devices to provide an entry or gateway into a neighborhood or other district. Surface alterations at intersections with local streets can include textured paving, pavement inserts, or concrete, brick, or stone materials.Curb extensions can also be placed at entrances to neighborhood areas, usually where a residential street intersects an arterial. The extension can discourage vehicular traffic from cutting through the neighborhood. The choice of materials should not pose a danger or deterrent to bicyclists or persons with disabilities. Cobbles present special difficulties, particularly for vehicles with narrow wheels or without suspension. Similarly, pavers with chamfered edges can impair a bicyclist's stability. • E 0 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 35 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' Raised Crosswalks/Intersections A raised crosswalk is a broad, flat-topped speed hump that coincides with pedestrian crosswalks at street intersections. Raised above the level of the roadway to slow traffic, it enhances crosswalk visibility and makes the crossing easier for pedestrians who may have difficulty stepping up and down curbs. It must be stable and firm and can be constructed of brick, concrete block, colored asphalt, or cement, with ramps striped for better visibility. A raised intersection is a plateau across the entire intersection, with a ramp on each approach. It can be enhanced through the use of distinctive surfacing such as pavement coloring, brickwork, or other pavements. In some cases, the distinction between roadway and sidewalk surfaces is blurred. If this is done, physical obstructions such as bollards or planters should be considered, restricting vehicular access. Ramps should not exceed a maximum gradient of 16 percent. Distinctive surfacing materials should be skid- resistant, particularly on inclines. Ramps should be clearly marked to enable bicyclists to identify and anticipate them, particularly under conditions of poor visibility. And care must be taken so the visually impaired have adequate cues to identify the roadway's location (e.g., tactile strips). Color contrasts will aid those who are partially sighted. Curvilinear Roads New roads can be designed to meander or turn sharply to slow traffic, limit views, and discourage speeding. Designs for new curvilinear roads should be careful to consider adequate access to adjacent properties, both in terms of servicing and the needs of the individual. Al.arrew Traffic Lanes�Read Diets Seetin-Ins fleir -;;I.l stireet te deteirlmilne v.4hietheir 1rA_ad_;UA.;ay lane widths ear; be redueed (within tl-,e AASHTO guidelines) so nge-Fe area e_-an be ded-ircated-to lameyele and pedestrian use-;;Ad- arsrsnereiatpedd traffire-rcalngeng racn-i-cTCT pedeStFian space. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 36 SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' BEFORE AFTER Landscaping and Urban Design With the adoption of the Major Corridors Urban Design Plan, Southlake recognized the s opportunities and importance of placemaking along the City's boulevards, entry points, Y and freeway interchanges. While roadside landscaping and urban design elements improve aesthetics and visitors' impressions of the community, they can also have a positive influence on driver behavior and may improve roadway safety. A pleasing roadside landscape can reduce driver stress levels, which may reduce occurrences of aggressive or unsafe driving. In addition, street trees may encourage motorists to drive more slowly, which in turn may result in fewer crashes and less severe injuries when %J4W crashes do occur.' F w'x - 1} r% E 'Wolf, K.L.2010. Safe Streets—A Literature Review. In:Green Cities:Good Health (www.greenhealth.washington.edu). College of the Environment, University of Washington. • E 0 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 37 SOUTHLAKE 2035] STREET LIGHTING STANDARDS The City has selected a standard for overhead street lighting along arterials.Adequate street lighting is normally provided in accordance with standard engineering practice when arterial streets are constructed or improved. Adequate arterial street lighting is defined by the American Association of State Transportation Officials (AASHTO) as providing average minimum 0.8 foot-candle illumination or average desired 1.0 foot-candle average illumination on the pavement. In addition to the standards defined by AASHTO, the City of Southlake lighting ordinance(Ordinance 693-C) limits the intensity of lighting to 0.2 foot-candle average illumination as measured at the property line in areas with single or two- family residential adjacency. The City and other governmental agencies are exempt from the lighting ordinance when installing lighting for safety or traffic control purposes, but City staff has used this as a guiding standard and endeavored not to unnecessarily exceed this threshold when possible. Generally, arterials and collectors will be lit to a higher standard than typical local neighborhood streets. All arterial street projects should include street lighting when they are constructed to recommended Thoroughfare Plan standards. A street lighting standard will establish a functionally and aesthetically consistent light fixture throughout the city. The following items are important considerations in selecting standard lighting fixtures: • AASHTO Criteria for Arterial Street Lighting Coverage o Desirable 1-foot candle average light o Minimum 0.8—foot candle average light • City of Southlake Lighting Ordinance o (Arterial Street Lights are exempt) 0 0.2 foot candle average at residential property line • Residential Adjacency - Electric Utility Standard Menus The following standards have been established to achieve adequate lighting levels between the 0.8 and 1.0 foot- candle standard, without unnecessarily exceeding the 0.2 foot-candle standard at the residential property line called for in our lighting ordinance. Standard type and appearance: • Gullwing or Shoebox fixtures • 30'median mounted painted steel pole • Dual fixtures • 250 watt high pressure sodium or LED lights as available • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 38 SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' Gullwing This type of lighting source is similar to Southlake Town Center parking lot lighting, the primary light source is inexpensive, it minimizes potential for "hotspots" and has been used along Kirkwood Boulevard, Grace Lane, and Blessed Way. Lighting • 1-foot candle light average Pole height 30-40' • - 150-250' 400 W (HPS) Available through Tri-County. Retail Installation and Electric Provider will install for Maintenance additional cost and maintain at no additional cost. Service Costs City is responsible The lighting footprint of the "Gullwing" is slightly above the 0.2 foot-candle limit at the right of way line on a standard width arterial street, but has a pronounced bulge that will exceed the 0.2 foot-candle limit and approach 0.5 foot-candle at the right of way line. Using the "Gullwing" fixture is acceptable on ROWS with no residential adjacency that would trigger the lighting ordinance limitation. However, most arterials have residential adjacency that would probably preclude the use of the "Gullwing"fixture. Shoebox This type of lighting source is similar to Byron Nelson Parkway street lighting, the primary light source is inexpensive, it minimizes potential for "hotspots" and has been used along North Kimball Avenue and North White Chapel Boulevard. VTMT 1-foot candle light average Pole height 30-40' •- 150-250' 400 W (HPS) Available through Oncor or Tri- Installation and County. Retail Electric Provider will .. Maintenance install and maintain at no capital cost , to the city. Service Costs City is responsible This is a standard fixture in the menu of options provided by two local electric providers. Like the "Gullwing" fixture,the"shoebox"fixture provides adequate lighting on the pavement between 0.8 and 1.0 foot-candles and slightly exceeds the 0.2 foot-candles at the right of way line, but does not have the bulge produced by the "Gullwing." • • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 39 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' ILLUMINATED STREET SIGNAGE Illuminated street signage can improve safety for the driving public by improving the visibility of major intersection signage. it ; nd-te,- fee the city t install b klit Accordingly, KIMBALL Ave Southlake has installed backlit intersection signage at major intersections. This type of signage is appropriate at signalized intersections along TxDOT rights-of-way or other arterials. Illuminated signage should be included with any future signalized intersections in the city. aiiiiiia cca Si-6iiaSe a en-g FM 17-99 IS SE e N e t9 be sen t�Et ed min. FV13. This PFO fe st i n e l udeSthc-ice e��e st+ens f Pnn17na t SH114 Cen o� � ivix�vv a^c of�__�, cv��qmerEe fit., NB en fir., Kimball Ave., - Vill ge C nteF DR Ca v iiia-Sc cciicci ���., carrell Ave., Byron Nelsen RarlEway, - White Chapel Blvd., Shady Oaks DR, WateFfE)Fd DR, Peytenv+lleAve., Randalo" Rd., and PeaTSan Ln. ACCESS MANAGEMENT Proper access management will help the city maintain smooth traffic flow, provide adequate street drainage, ensure that all properties have safe and efficient vehicular access to or from the public street system and ensure that public streets have the capacity to handle peak traffic volumes. A driveway ordinance is one tool the city can use to manage access along public streets. Generally, such an ordinance can prohibit the indiscriminate location and spacing of driveways while maintaining reasonable vehicular access to and from the public street system; reduce conflicting turning movements and congestion thereby reducing vehicular accidents; and maintain and enhance a positive image for the attraction of new, high quality, residential and nonresidential development in the city. Southlake's existing driveway ordinance was developed in 1995 and it is recommended that the city update the driveway ordinance to reflect best practices and meet the current needs of residents, businesses and other property owners. THOROUGHFARE RECOMMENDATIONS A number of right of way improvements are recommended in this plan that will assist in achieving the recommended street design standards and help in alleviating specific concerns that may involve that particular section of roadway. The map on the following page shows the locations for the various recommendations. The list of recommendations is included in Appendix C. • E 0 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 40 SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' Southlake Thoroughfare '- _ '••.�• Recommendations Location Map •� - Tier 1 ; °•.� - Tier 2 - Tier 3 1 `i all MTB All MT28 , _.l_u_u- - MT7 MT9 ,�� � ■ , 1 , i aT4 MT16 ' MT31 A'II ' al� ■ �� , �T42 MT32 / ,•j♦ MT12 MT28 :� • �j MT33 MT1�� ♦. a _ll "_.. �••� • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 41 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION This chapter of the Southlake 2035 Mobility Master Plan addresses active transportation, primarily pedestrian and bicycle mobility, and serves as the City's Trail System Master Plan. As such, this chapter updates and consolidates the Sidewalk Plan and the Southlake Pathways Plan. In addition,this chapter expands on previous plans by providing recommendations for crosswalks. This Plan provides a general overview of active transportation planning and its history in Southlake and also provides a summary and recommendations for bicycle facilities, sidewalk facilities, and crosswalks. ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Active transporation refers to human-powered modes of travel — primarily walking and cycling. Active transportation may be recreational, such as a hike through a park, or utilitarian, such Southlake 2035 Mobility Goal as a trip to school, work, shopping, or services. The benefits of "Develop an innovative mobility active transportation are numerous and include improved public health, a cleaner environment, reduced congestion, system that provides for the saf increased social interaction, and improved quality of life. In convenient, efficient movement of addition, walking and cycling are convenient and economical. people and good According to the 2017 National Household Travel Survey, congestion, promotes energy and walking and cycling have become more popular. Biking and transportation efficiency and walking made up 11.5% of all trips in the United States in 2017 promotes expanded opportunities compared to 9.5% in 2001 — a 21% increase. Further, many destinations in Southlake are desirable to access by bicycle orroutine on foot, including parks, schools, community events, and needs by walking or ' pedestrian-friendly shopping areas like Town Square. For all these reasons, the City of Southlake and the broader DFW Excerptedfromthe Southlake 2035 region have placed an increased emphasis on active Vision, GoalsObjectives transportation in recent years. HISTORY OF ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION IN SOUTHLAKE Historically, Southlake's growth was automobile-oriented and characterized by large lot single-family development that was not pedestrian-oriented. This type of development coupled with the City's desire to maintain its rural character generally resulted in the omission of bike paths and sidewalks for practical and aesthetic reasons. However, as Southlake has transitioned from a rural community to a suburban city with numerous pedestrian-friendly destinations,the desire for active transportation options has grown. Formal emphasis on active transportation first emerged in Southlake in the early 1990s. The 1995 Trail System Master Plan was the City's first plan to address pedestrian and bicycle mobility on a broad scale. The Plan was developed in response to a citizen survey conducted in the early 1990s that identified hike and bike trails as well as nature areas and trails as top priorities. The Plan focused primarily on potential on-street bike routes and sidewalks adjacent to roadways. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 42 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Six years later, the Plan was updated and the 2001 Southlake Pathways Plan was adopted. This revised plan expanded the originally proposed trail network to a more comprehensive system which included greenway paths in future developments as well as additional equestrian and hiking trails. The Pathways Plan was updated again as part of the 2025 comprehensive plan update (Southlake 2025 Plan) and the 2005 Southlake Pathways Plan was adopted. During the update process, a need to address gaps in the existing network as well as connections between recreational trails and destinations was recognized. As a result, the 2007 Sidewalk Plan was developed and adopted in 2007 as a complement to the Pathways Plan. The Sidewalk Plan identified planning, policy and implementation areas to provide or improve access to the City's pedestrian network. Perhaps most significantly, the Sidewalk Plan identified and prioritized sidewalk and trail infill segments for construction. This prioritization list continues to be used as a starting point on an annual basis when determining which sidewalks will be constructed through the Capital Improvements Program. Also during the Southlake 2025 process, recommendations were made to amend relevant development ordinances to require sidewalks for all new development. Those recommendations were implemented in 2006 and 2007. With limited exceptions, all new development must provide sidewalks along city streets. In 2014, the Southlake 2030 Mobility Master Plan was adopted. This plan updated and consolidated three comprehensive plan elements:the Sidewalk Plan,the Pathways Plan,and the Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan. In addition to plan development and ordinance amendments, the City has worked to improve pedestrian mobility by pursuing grant funding opportunities and by dedicating approximately $200,000 annually for the construction of sidewalks. As evidenced in Southlake's 2019 Citizen Survey, today there continues to be substantial public support and interest in pedestrian facilities. Sixty-seven percent of survey respondents said"providing pedestrian pathways, sidewalks, and trails" is "very important", with an additional 24% ranking it "somewhat important". With the development of this plan, the City is taking an additional step toward achieving a safe, efficient, seamless, and effective active transportation network. REGIONAL PLANNING Beyond city-level planning,the City has also shown it's commitment to active transportation by engaging in planning at a multi-jurisdictional level and a regional level. City staff currently participate in the regional-scale NCTCOG Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee is organized and supported by the North Central Texas - Council of Governments(NCTCOG)for the 16-county region. The Committee provides technical expertise, public outreach support, review of regional North Central Texas bicycle and pedestrian planning,and assistance in the selection of bicycle and Council of Governments pedestrian projects funded by the Regional Transportation Council. The Committee generally meets quarterly and the meetings provide an opportunity for local governments to share best practices, success stories, and discuss common issues in an effort to improve local initiatives and enhance regional coordination. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 43 SOUTHLAKE 2035 thp-T.v^ .qn. Ref.vv estlak the Town of TFE)p ,.,Club,the City e# SecFtla�-ld the iCity of D., ..I.., 6 Ee"vn'-r'n=rcre - siacvvaiic aiia tFaihlanning—and to explere tr anSPE) tatiGn funding eptiens. Teday, th15 regienal wt. 661 Irrcrvv�crt+erEl25 t }IFC�pi Ft+e s S✓evt }Izric� _ GFapeyine, i 'G alle- - e,Kel1er, Westla.. Tm-., hc F, G Deurtec" ^7V, thI ke, FIGWeF , NvT+h D'chTl mI =4r. .aJ i � Hulls, and C-eppell - as well as DFW Xrr,.,r+. The Pie G.PrAtr-,I T ,, rr.1 4,ral Of r_.,.,, RtS -,Irr. PaFt„-pat t MOVING FORWARD Recommendations for improvements for active transportation generally fall into three categories, Education and Promotion, Safe Behavior and Enforcement, and Planning and Infrastructure: Education and Promotion By teaching pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists to practice safe behavior while out on the City's roads, sidewalks, and trails, we can create a safer, more welcoming active transportation network. Education and training increase confidence which translates into a greater number of individuals choosing to utilize active transportation options. In addition to providing outreach and education to road and sidewalk users, an often overlooked audience includes staff and decision makers. This type of program is important for building support of a wider public education campaign, increasing understanding of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure needs, and fostering relationships between the city and other local agencies and groups with an interest in pedestrian and cyclist safety (schools, hospitals, running/bicycle stores or clubs). Internal education may include but is not limited to hosting in-house meetings or forums, providing printed educational materials, and organizing "walk/bike the trail" events where participants walk/run/bike on selected routes. There are a number of resources available for developing a customized education program for Southlake. A few resources as well as model community activities are highlighted on the next page. • National Bicycle Safety Education Resource Center http://www.bicyclinginfo.org/education/resource/fhwa.html • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 44 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] The Federal Highway Administration's National Bicycle Safety Education Resource Center provides bicycle safety education information. The website includes a searchable database, a Database Guide that identifies training needs for different audiences, and a Good Practices Guide that serves as a resource in planning and developing bicycle safety education programs. AP • NCTCOG Bicycle& Pedestrian Safety Education L 0 0 K 0 U T http://www.nctcog.orp/trans/sustdev/bikeped/safetyed/ https://www.lookouttexans.org T E A N The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) offers several publications on bicycle and pedestrian safety that may be I K E reproduced and distributed. In addition, NCTCOG launched the Look Out Texans campaign in 2015,which provides safety tips, educational videos, W L and free bicycle and walking safety school kits for grades 3 through 8. T Beyond educational outreach, NCTCOG facilitates regional coordination D R1 for bicycle and pedestrian planning, provides statistics and resources F E L related to active transportation, and promotes National Bike to Work Week, National Bike to Work Day, and Bike to School Day. it • Federal Highway Administration Pedestrian Safety Campaign http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local rural/pedcampaign/ The Federal Highway Administration offers a Pedestrian Safety Campaign Think of the impact Could Make. that includes ready-made outreach materials that communities can I I I customize and use locally. The website includes materials for use in I television, radio, cinema, and print advertising. The website also includes a Campaign Planning Step by Step Guide that explains how to implement the campaign. The purpose of the campaign is to Be Safe.Be Smart.Be Seen. i� � 'wh�� 1. Sensitize drivers to the fact that pedestrians are legitimate road Make Sure Drivers Can See You. users and should always be expected on or near the roadway 2. Educate pedestrians about minimizing risks to their safety 3. Develop program materials to explain or enhance the operation of pedestrian facilities, such as crosswalks and pedestrian signals. • BikeTexas www.biketexas.org BikeTexas is a non-profit organization that works to increase awareness and interest in bicycle access, safety, and education. BikeTexas organizes bike rides and provides a wealth of information including bicycle related news, bicycle route maps, and bicycle laws. In addition, BikeTexas offers SafeCyclist Certification Training which provides teachers, police, and other youth community workers with the skills and curriculum to teach youth about bicycle and pedestrian safety. The organization also offers a BikeTexas Safe Routes to School Event Manual, which describes how to organize a bike/walk events and provides templates for public service announcements, press releases,donation requests letters,flyers,as well as event checklists and other materials. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 45 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' • San Antonio, Texas The City of San Antonio is one of thirteen Texas communities that has i received "Bicycle Friendly" designation by the League of American Bicyclists. The City has received this designation not only for their provision of bicycle infrastructure,but also for their cycling education and promotion activities. For example, the City of San Antonio's Office of Sustainability has an outreach campaign called "Get Cyched" that promotes cycling and educates the community about the rules of the road for both drivers and cyclists. Some of the City's outreach materials have included print ads, bill boards, bumper stickers, and posters. In addition, San Antonio has adopted a safe passing ordinance which establishes a minimum passing distance of 3 feet for cars (or 6 feet for commercial or large trucks) when passing vulnerable road users such as bicyclists when road conditions allow. The City also has a comprehensive website that outlines city bike ordinances,state bike and pedestrian laws, and provides downloadable "Get Cyched" outreach materials. Siclovia, a bi-annual car-free event organized by the YMCA of Greater San Antonio, further promotes cycling and other forms of active transportation sltbvia in San Antonio. Select streets are closed to automobiles for approximately 6 hours on a Sunday to allow residents to bike, walk, run, skateboard, or MMUMM participate in other recreational activities without worrying about cars. In addition, there are Reclovia areas that include free activities such as group SAN ANTONIO'S FAMILY ADVENTURE exercise classes as well as live music, water stations, and rest areas. • Austin,Texas Austin has received Bicycle Friendly designation and is also the only Texas city to achieve Walk Friendly designation. One reason for this dual designation is Austin's Safe Routes to School Program. This program trains, hires, and supervises crossing guards for 97 schools and offers education on bicycle, pedestrian, bus and train safety to daycares, elementary schools, and parent groups in the city. In addition, similar to San Antonio, the City of Austin has adopted a Vulnerable Road User's Ordinance, which recommends motorists maintain a minimum of 3 feet when passing vulnerable road users such as bicyclists and pedestrians. Other promotion activities that communities have utilized include: ➢ Community rides ➢ Trail maintenance days ➢ 41h of July bike parade ➢ Kids'triathlon ➢ Bicycle fashion show or decoration competition ➢ Providing bicycle and pedestrian safety courses for the general public ➢ Hosting bicycle instructor certification training(such as the SafeCyclist curriculum) Safe Behavior and Enforcement While it is important to educate citizens about safe biking, walking, and driving habits, there must be effective enforcement of the rules of the road. Motorists who exceed the speed limit or fail to stop for pedestrians in • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 46 SOUTHLAKE 2035 1 •f crosswalks should be held accountable for their actions. Likewise, bicyclists and pedestrians that fail to follow traffic laws should also be held accountable. Planning and Infrastructure Planning and Infrastructure includes physical improvements to the City's active transportation network as well as policy improvements. The following sections address bicycle facilities, sidewalks, and crosswalks. BICYCLE FACILITIES Bicycling is an affordable mode of transportation that provides physical activity, produces no pollution, and supports social interaction. Cycling empowers residents of all ages, including children, by providing a mobility alternative to the automobile. Unfortunately, Southlake currently lacks a connected system of bicycle trails and the widespread development of dedicated bicycle lanes is impractical due to right-of-way and funding constraints. However, improvements can be made to provide a safer cycling environment and a connected system of bicycle facilities. Bicycle facilities, as defined by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), are "improvements and provisions to accommodate or encourage bicycling, including parking and storage facilities, and shared roadways not specifically defined for bicycle use". Goals •r improved • II • Improve public safety and reduce opportunities for injuries t on •.• • Promote environment, i • an improved quality of • Provide • • routes offering easy transportation to schools, parks, and pedestrian-friendly shopping areas. Extend recreational opportunities and iaz: transportation • by • to neighboring Types of Cyclists Bicyclist skill level is important for understanding the characteristics and infrastructure preferences of different cyclists. Bicycle infrastructure should use planning and design options, from shared roadways to separate facilities, to accommodate as many user types as possible and to provide a comfortable experience for the greatest number of cyclists. For example, some recreational cyclists may only feel comfortable using off-street pathways or on-street dedicated bike lanes. Other cyclists may prefer to use streets and do not want their right to occupy any travel lane limited by bike lanes. Several systems of bicyclist classification are used within the bicycle planning and engineering professions. The following bicycle user types are adapted from a classification system adopted by the City of Portland, Oregon: • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 47 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Cyclists who will ride anywhere regardless of roadway conditions.These cyclists can Strong and Fearless ride faster, prefer direct routes,and will choose to ride on roadways,even if shared with other vehicles, over separated bicycle facilities like shared use paths. They may cycle longer distances and ride at speeds of 20-40 mph depending on grade. Intermediate cyclists who are mostly comfortable riding on all types of bicycle Enthused and facilities but typically prefer low traffic streets, bike lanes,or separated paths when Confident available. They may deviate from a more direct route to avoid arterials with heavy traffic volumes, in favor of a preferred facility type. These cyclists typically ride only on low volume, low speed streets or paths under favorable conditions and weather. They perceive traffic and safety as significant Interested but barriers to increased cycling. They may choose to ride on sidewalks if no on-street Concerned facility is available or walk their bike across intersections. These cyclists may become Enthused and confident with additional education and experience. They typically ride shorter distances at speeds around 8-12 mph. Not Able or Not People in this category are not cyclists. They may not participate in cycling for a Interested variety of reasons, including inability, a lack of interest, or perceived safety issues. Special accommodations are needed for children to feel safe bicycling. Children riding on their own or with parents may not ride as quickly as adults, but still desire access to schools, parks, and other key destinations. While children have a wide range of skills and cognitive abilities, children tend to: o Have a relatively narrow field of vision. o Have difficulty understanding risks. o Have difficulties accurately judging the speed and distance of an f z� approaching vehicle. f o Assume the driver of a motor vehicle can see them if they can see the vehicle. o Have difficulty concentrating on more than one thing at a time. o Have difficulty determining the direction of auditory input. o Have little experience with the rules of the road because they do not drive.* 2012 Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities,4th Edition,AASHTO Many of the cyclists who are currently seen riding in Southlake would likely fit into either the Strong and Fearless or Enthused and Confident categories. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 48 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] ' Types of Infrastructure Southlake's network of bicycle facilities should include a mix of facility types which can be practically implemented and meet the needs of local cyclists. When identifying bike routes and the types of facilities to implement throughout the City, consideration must be given to accommodate different types of cyclists and to respond to the context of neighboring land uses, speed and volume of motorist traffic, and availability of right of way. The following types of bicycle infrastructure are not intended to be an exhaustive list, but they are the types of facilities that may be appropriate for consideration in Southlake. • Shared Lanes A shared roadway is simply a roadway that is open to both bicycle and motor vehicle travel. Generally in Texas, bikes are permitted on all roadways even if there are no signs or lane markings indicating that the roadway is a shared lane facility. According to the Texas Transportation Code (§551.103), bicyclists are required to ride as near as practicable (not as possible)to the right curb or edge of the roadway, with limited exceptions. • Dedicated Bicycle Lanes Bike lanes are one-way facilities that typically carry bicycle traffic in the same direction as adjacent motor vehicle traffic. Bike lanes are provided for the exclusive or preferential use of bicyclists on a roadway and are identified through signage, striping, or other pavement markings. Bike lanes are typically provided on thoroughfare types of facilities and are intended to provide separation between motor vehicles and bicyclists. This separation provides for additional comfort to the less experienced bicyclists and encourages these riders to use on-street facilities. Traditionally, only the more aggressive, experienced riders (Enthused and Confident riders) are comfortable sharing a lane with cars on thoroughfare roadways.The addition of bike lanes can increase types and numbers of on-street riders. However, Enthused and Confident riders may disregard bike lanes if they are too � = successful and become crowded with slower users. The minimum operating width of a bike lane should not be less than 4 feet and the maximum operating width should not be greater than 6 feet. Bike lanes wider than 6 feet are commonly mistaken by motor vehicles as travel lanes or parking areas. Due to right of way constraints,dedicated bicycle lanes are not feasible in Southlake unless they are incorporated into future roadway widening projects. Since most roadways will not be widened, other facility options must be considered. On Street!;h2rrQ4A01; r_1harre_;.A.f Or. a shareedd lane pavement n9ad(ing that Faises awaFP-.RP-.r.r that -hoeyelists are pFesent and eneaurages dway useFS tR_ share the Fead. The r.h.aFFew symbel provides a higher level of guidane_-e te he • [SOUTHLAKE 20351 49 SOUTHLAKE 2035 beGyGlIstS "—terra n r^ct6�T5 5 �3y ,rarEat the biGyr=lIsts' preper pvsiuviiiirsddiuiiii tilt iaiic. vharreMd marlElnss ban be�laEedOFF 9R stFeets w th a-speed of 35 Rqph eF less. R-elev., of g idaRee fE)F the P asement e s arrevds. Note a MAY USE hr;rr.,,.,: center of the r wide, FULL LANE pevement7 Gn4 L a =ShGFe.J -GRe41.4h 0rrstheet PG G11ei..GF :. g. /1t-ICPfIrt used,llf-eetfi�GM thef-GIF-19 4the C-UF19 eFe4ge ef the rF WheR 259Teet. S+gRs s,,,�ld used to suppTem-ent-the-ski sjH'�s eR Shared rewtefuc-ala * s—A��oT���€� "" cs✓€�vLi - • Signed Roadways Signed roadways are simply shared lane roadways with a "SHARE THE �l ROAD" sign assembly or similar roadside sign type. Signed roadways _ are facilities that are already SHARE frequently utilized by bicyclists or that 112 inc 72 inches THE ROAD the City would like to encourage bicyclists to utilize over unsigned , roadways. The signage provides enhanced awareness to motorists that bicyclists are present and reminds them to afford the bicyclists the same rights as c es they would to motorized vehicles. Due to limited right of way and funding availability, this type of bicycle facility may be the most practical for improving the bicycle network throughout the City. • Wide Outside Lane Roadways Lane widths that are 14 feet or greater (excluding the gutter) allow motorists to pass bicyclists without encroaching into the adjacent lane. Wide outside lanes are an option when there is some available right of way to accommodate cyclists, but the width is not sufficient to provide either bike lanes or paved shoulders. This type of facility is generally appropriate on arterials and collectors where the design speed is greater than 25 mph. Since wide lanes may result in faster travel speed by motorists,wide outside lane facilities should be signed appropriately with signage to raise awareness of the presence of bicyclists. The new section of White Chapel Boulevard is an example of a Wide Outside Lane facility, with 14 foot outside lanes to accommodate cyclists. • E [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 5o [SOUTHLAKE 2035] • Sidewalks While the roadway is typically the • • RIST safest location for most bicyclists to RULES OF • AD ride, sidewalks are a part of the active Obey speed limits. Higher speeds transportation network and some result greater to cyclists bicyclists, particularly children, may and pedestrians. prefer sidewalks to roadways. f Bicyclists may ride on sidewalks if they Obey signs,signals, and travel at or below the design speed of Always lookbicyclists the sidewalk (often the speed of a turning leftor typical jogger). However, apart from ._ bicyclists giving at least children, most bicyclists typically travel faster than this speed. feet of space. Slow down and •. not spacepass if does not allow.are several reasons bicycling on sidewalks is not Do not _ your horn in close recommended. The narrow width of the City's sidewalks (8 feet proximity to in width or less) makes passing other sidewalk users difficult and can cause conflicts between users. The minimum recommended Look for bicyclists when "- ning width for paths to accommodate both bicyclists and pedestrians is 10 feet. In addition, bicyclists on sidewalks do not approach intersections and driveways from the same areas as motor vehicle traffic,so they can be difficult for drivers to see. Further, cycling hazards, such as low hanging branches, are more likely BICYCLIST on a sidewalk than on a roadway. Bicyclists who choose to ride RULES OF ROAD on the sidewalk in either direction must be educated about the hazards associated with this practice and understand that Follow the same laws that apply t• cyclists must always yield to pedestrians on sidewalks. motorists. Obey all traffic signals, signs,and lane markings. • Existing Facilities Always yield to pedestrians. Ride on the right side of the road with Currently there are no dedicated bicycle lanes in the City. the flow of However, there are several routes that have "Share the Road" properlyAlways wear a signs (see images on the next page) to raise awareness of fitting bicyclists. These routes include: Ride predictably,assertively,an• •- ➢ Dove Road alert. Use hand signalsbefore ➢ North White Chapel Boulevard ➢ Peytonville Avenue Be visible. ' at night, use lights, ➢ Carroll Avenue reflectors,and bright clothing. ➢ Continental Boulevard Avoid riding on possible. ridingWhen on sidewalks, -. speeds close to a typical jogging • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 51 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' These are the routes that are most frequently used by local bicycling clubs. In addition,there are bicycle signs(bicycle symbol without the"Share the Road"text) on Southlake Boulevard near White Chapel Boulevard and Peytonville Avenue. • Recommended Facilities When developing recommendations, the types of cyclists, the types of trips (utilitarian vs. recreational) and the different types of equipment (such as road bikes, cruisers, tandems, and trailers) are all important considerations. The ultimate goal of the bicycle network is to accommodate as many user types as possible and to provide a comfortable experience for the greatest number of cyclists. With these considerations in mind,the recommended facilities are shown Example of a share the on the following map. The recommended facilities are available in a table format Road"sign found on multiple in Appendix C. routes ■. f e — Bicycle sign on Southlake Boulevard • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 52 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' LEGEND `�.� -Signed Route(Tier III)* Bicycle Facility Signage should be placed on �•.� Kirkwood only after a continuous Master Plan °a roadway section is completed �•.� (Kimball Ave.to SH 114) I -Signed(Tier q jveDB day j Dedicated Bike Lane(Tier III) j -Signed Routes(Tier q 1. 3 I 1~ I i w a I I o tESOUTH"KEBLVD HLANDSTFL•ORENCE'RD--�TOIJOHNSON RD WSOUTHLAKE BLVD R \ I 2 I �-UNIONCHURCH-¢ - x , •'� WCONTINENTALBLVO ;' E CONTINENTAL BL'ID� I• •m • [SOUTHLAKE 20351 53 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] SIDEWALK FACILITIES A safe, seamless, and effective sidewalk network continues to be atop priority for the City of Southlake. In the 2019 Citizen Survey, 91% of respondents listed sidewalks as a topic of high importance. The primary objectives for Southlake's pedestrian network are to connect neighborhoods to adjacent schools, parks, recreational facilities, shopping centers, and employment centers; to close gaps between existing facilities; to facilitate travel between neighborhoods; and to connect Southlake with neighboring communities. Sidewalk construction in Southlake is primarily funded through the following means: • Capital Improvements Program Direct Funding. Each year, approximately $200,000 is allocated for sidewalk construction. • Capital Improvements Program Indirect Funding. When roadways are widened, sidewalks are included on both sides of the street as part of the project. In addition, park — improvement projects may include sidewalk and trail construction. '-. • Developers Agreements. With limited exceptions, all new commerical and residential developments must provide sidewalks along City streets. • Grant Funding. City staff actively seek out grant funding opportunities for sidewalks and apply whenever the City is eligible. Several of the sidewalk segments along Southlake Boulevard were funded in part by the competitive Transportation Enhancement Program, which is federally . funded and administered by the Texas Department of Transportation. • Neighborhood Sidewalk Matching Funds Program. Y Residents can formally request the City to participate in up to 50%of the cost of designing and constructing sidewalks within their neighborhoods. Neighborhood organizations and Homeowners Associations are encouraged to apply for funds to build sidewalk projects they feel would make a difference in improving the safety of their neighborhoods or provide critical connections to schools, parks or other sidewalks. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 54 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] ,. the fe.-+hpor r .,+.-mho itio . and are eligible fAr +-...dpd, +�..., Accessibility In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),the City of Southlake completed a self-evaluation of all city services, programs and facilities.The purpose of a self-evaluation is to identify and correct deficiencies that are not consistent with the requirements of Title II of the ADA. Southlake's self-evaluation included assessments of curb ramps and pedestrian signals. The City of Southlake's ADA Transition Plan addresses noncompliant facilities. Sidewalk Classification In an effort to simplify the Pathways Map and make the proposed pathways system easier to understand, the pathways classifications used in previous plans were consolidated into the following categories: • Pathway—Any sidewalk or trail intended primarily for walking, running, hiking,and/or horseback riding. • Existing Sidewalks—Built sidewalks that are 6 feet or less in width. • Existing Multi-Use — Built sidewalks that are 8 feet or more in width. Although these sidewalks are intended primarily for pedestrians, they may also accommodate low speed cyclists and other similar users. • Existing Equestrian/Hike—Built trails and sidewalks, primarily located within City parks. These pathways vary in width depending on site conditions and user needs. They may be concrete, asphalt or natural surface and are intended primarily for hiking and/or horseback riding. • Future Sidewalks—Recommended sidewalks that are 6 feet in width. • Future Multi-Use—Recommended sidewalks that are 8 feet or more in width. Although these sidewalks are intended primarily for pedestrians,they may also accommodate low speed cyclists and other similar users. • Park Connection Recommendations—Planned sidewalks or trails within or adjacent to City parks. These pathways may be concrete,asphalt or natural surface and vary in width. Additional information on these sidewalks and trails may be found in the Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Master Plan. Sidewalk Construction Prioritization Beginning with the 2007 Sidewalk Plan, staff identified critical sidewalk gaps throughout the City and ranked those gaps based on the following criteria: 1. proximity to schools, 2. proximity to parks, 3. proximity to existing and future trails, 4. proximity to destinations of commerce, • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 55 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' S. connections to other cities,and 6. adjacency to roadway type(residential street vs. arterial). On an annual basis, that initial ranking was used to prioritize construction through the Capital Improvements Program,also taking into account factors of funding availability, right-of-way constraints,construction feasibility (due to topography, drainage,trees, etc.), and development status of the land. In addition, new segments were identified annually as a result of the construction of new neighborhoods, schools, parks, commercial developments, and roadway improvements. The 2007 list of critical sidewalk gaps was reviewed and updated as part of the Southlake 2030 process, and again as part of the Southlake 2035 process. Segments that have been completed or that are in progress have been removed and new segments have been identified and added as a result of continued development. For Southlake 2035, a consulting firm was utilized to rank segments based upon: • Connectivity-prioritizing connections to schools and parks; • Constructability - including factors such as relocation of utilities, tree removal, and impact on other existing features(such as signs,fencing,and landscaping);and • Feasibility-considering factors such as whether or not an easement is needed,presence of a bar ditch, the need for a pedestrian bridge,and grading. Once the initial rankings were received from the consultant, the list was reviewed and assessed by staff. In particular, additional consideration was given for segments that could be included with other planned capital projects. The resulting sidewalk construction priority list will continue to serve as a starting point for prioritizing protects for construction through the CIP on an annual basis. This list is intended to be a fluid document with the addition of new segments as new developments are constructed and new needs are identified. Further,tier ranking recommendations are intended only as a general guideline and are subject to change due to site conditions, feasibility of inclusion in other CIP protects (such as roadway improvements), and availability of funding during the given budget year. See Appendix C for the sidewalk construction priority list. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 56 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' Official SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Pathways Map v AN Ordnance No.XXXX J V `I P.dop*d by the Southlake City Coumil on XXXXX XX,X)m 2 O 3 5 DRAFT Im:.> ONLY u' 1 t Ll I I I.mI5 p R—:M MI Pb"e 4 o-bm Sei— OpiGGeogepl.c kfonmtian S!le,m • [SOUTHLAKE 20351 57 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] •• ' CROSSWALKS In addition to sidewalks and bicycle facilities, planning for a safe, efficient, and effective active transportation system must also include crosswalks. As traffic volumes continue to increase with local and regional growth and pedestrian counts increase with the expansion and improvement of the active transportation system, establishing and maintaining safe and effective crosswalks is of critical importance. Although different types of crosswalks are appropriate depending on roadway classification and site conditions (such as school zones), uniform standards for similar conditions are desirable to prevent confusion among motorists and pedestrians.These standards are outlined in the following table. r t a� Y r aKF 4 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 58 SOUTHLAKE 2035j CrosswalkTable P-1: Recommended Crosswalk Type • Recommended Application Type Continental "Continental" striping is recommended across arterials, Marked- collectors, school drives, and Continental residential streets within school zones. MarkedStandard "Standard" striping is Standard recommended across local and residential streets. a'r Intersections (without traffic lights) that are in or near school zones or in other areas that are likely to have heavy pedestrian traffic. Marked Signs may be used in conjunction Signed with "continental" striping, "standard" striping, or stamped asphalt or concrete depending on the type of street. �� Roundabouts,Town Square, S.H. Stamped --- 114 intersections, and selected Asphalt or Stamped Y*-° • intersections along Southlake Boulevard (as recommended in the Concrete Urban Design Study). • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 59 SOUTHLAKE 2035 CrosswalkTable P-1: Recommended Crosswalk Type • Recommended Application Type Midblock locations, particularly in Active or near school zones. Active Warning warning beacons should be used in Beacon conjunction with "continental" _ -- _ -- striping. slow PUSH BUTTON FOR At intersecting collector and Traffic Signal arterial intersections, push-button Intersectionsactivated pedestrian signals are recommended. i • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 60 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] IMPLEMENTATION, PRIORITAZATION AND EVALUATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION A plan is only as good as the methods by which it is used as a tool for the ultimate goal, implementation. While several substantial transportation improvements through the City remain, the City is in generally good shape (compared to population size) with meeting current needs. The next section provides the strategy that was undertaken to determine which recommendations and needs should be addressed earlier rather than later. The end result of this strategy is the Summary of All Mobility Plan Recommendations (Appendix C on page which serves as the blueprint for plan implementation. PRIORITIZATION SCHEDULE For each specific recommendation, a relative ranking (tier) has been established to assist with the timeframe of implementation for the recommendation. The tiers are divided into three different categories based on timeframe to implement: • Tier 1: 1 to 3 Years • Tier 2: 4 to 7 Years • Tier 3: 8 Years and beyond The tier rankings are used in the development of department work plans as well as the Capital Improvements Program (CIP). In fact, the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) planning process begins and ends with projects recommended by this master plan.Annually,as part of the City's budget process, city staff analyzes the adopted master plan and develops a comprehensive list of projects with preliminary cost estimates for inclusion in the proposed CIP. The proposed CIP is submitted to the CIP Technical Committee (department directors), who rank them based on set criteria. The priority list that was developed during this master plan will help guide future members of the City's boards and City Council when making decisions related to the CIP. While these tiers provide the ideal order of implementation and desired priority for the mobility recommendations,all recommendations are subject to available funding during the given budget year and will be placed on the Capital Improvements Program (CIP)accordingly. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 61 [SOUTH LAKE 20351 APPENDIX A Level of Service (LOS) Descriptions The following descriptions have been adopted directly from the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000), Fourth Edition. Quality of service requires quantitative measures to characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream. Level of service (LOS) is a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience. Six levels of service are defined for each type of facility that has analysis procedures available. Letters designate each level, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions and the driver's perception of those conditions. Safety is not included in the measures that establish service levels. Level of Service A Level of Service A describes a condition of free flow, with low volumes and high speeds. Level of Service 8 Level of Service B is the zone of stable flow, with operating speeds beginning to be restricted somewhat by traffic conditions. Drivers still have reasonable freedom to select their speed and lane of operation. Level of Service C Level of Service C is the zone of mostly stable flow, but speeds and maneuverability are more closely constricted by the higher volumes. Level of Service D Level of Service D is a zone that approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds, however driving speed is considerably affected by changes in operating conditions. Level of Service E Level of Service E is a zone that cannot be described by speed alone. Operating speeds are lower than in Level D, with volume at or near the capacity of the highway. Level of Service F Level of Service F is a zone in which the operating speeds are controlled by stop-and-go mechanisms, such as traffic lights. This is called forced flow operation. The stoppages disrupt the traffic flow so that the volume carried by the roadway falls below its capacity; without the stoppages, the volume of traffic on the roadway would be higher, or in other words, it would reach capacity. • • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 62 [SOUTH LAKE 2035 It should be noted that LOS is a measure of a roadway segment's (zone's) efficiency at moving automobiles through the zone. By definition, it places a high emphasis on the free-flowing speeds of autos and does not give consideration to the comfort or safety other roadway users such bicyclists or pedestrians. amp Excc l lent L AMP 4F&PGood ddMkW mono AMP AMP AVerAqi- 401111111P AMP amp AMD& amp Acccptobk- r & Congesred i � � Sev�rery�n�stecl Ti _ n L L7 a�. nFD ®FE • • [SOUTHLAKE 20351 63 SOUTH LAKE 2035 APPENDIX 6 South Village Center Drive Guidelines ORDINANCE NO. 1056 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, FOR AMENDMENT TO THE ADOPTED MOBILITY AND MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN MAP TO INDICATE THE GENERAL ALIGNMENT OF SOUTH VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE GENERALLY EXTENDING FROM EAST SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD (FM 1709) to SOUTH NOLEN DRIVE AND TO BECOME EFFECTIVE UPON ITS PASSAGE AND APPROVAL.. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article Xl, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code: and WHEREAS, Section 11.06 of the Southlake City Charter provides for the adoption and updating of a Comprehensive Master Plan and its components, including the Master Thoroughfare Plan; and. WHEREAS.the Planning and Zoning Commission has forwarded a recommendation for an amendment to the Master Thoroughfare Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 Pursuant to Section 11.06 of the Southlake City Charter,the Comprehensive Master Plan,of which the Master Thoroughfare Plan is a component, may be submitted in whole or in part from time to time to the Council for their adoption, accompanied by a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and shall contain a planning consideration for a period of at least ten (10) years. The proposed amendments to the Master Thoroughfare Plan,noted by graphical depiction in Exhibit"A"and Exhibit"B" and attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: • Design as a 60' foot(C2U) collector roadway with a speed limit not to exceed 30 mph. • Design as an "Urban" cross-section roadway which includes curb gutters.street trees and sidewalks. • Traffic calming measures should be considered in the design of the roadway. • At the time the roadway connection to Kimball Avenue is made from the west, the CISD's north drive connection to Kimball Avenue shall be closed and the western most school service drive shall be connected to the new roadway. • • [SOUTHLAKE 20351 64 SOUTH LAKE 2035 • Intersection improvements such as pedestrian crosswalks should be considered at the following locations: 1)the two-way intersection located at the southwest corner of the Gateway Church property; 2)the intersection at Southwood Drive: 3)the three-way intersection located at the corners of the Greenway/Quicksall/CISD properties; 4) the intersection of the school's west drive: and 5)the intersection of S. Kimball Avenue and S. Village Center Drive. • The northern boundary of the CISD property should be fenced to minimize potential vehicle/pedestrian conflict. • During design of the roadway. mitigation measures of the new roadway on adjacent residential properties such as landscaping. buffering, fencing and screening shall be considered. • The portion of the roadway near the intersection of the CISD school drive shall be designed with a center turn lane in both directions to allow stacking to occur during school drop of and pick up times. • Staff will evaluate the southwest portion of the roadway alignment (Gateway Church property where the 90 degree turn is located) and consider safety improvements during the design that will improve safety to the adjacent neighborhood. SECTION 2 The different elements of the Comprehensive Master Plan, as adopted and amended by the City Council from time to time, shall be kept on file in the office of the City Secretary of the City of Southlake, along with a copy of the minute order of the Council so adopting or approving same.Any existing element of the Comprehensive Master Plan which has been heretofore adopted by the City Council shall remain in full force and effect until amended by the City Council as provided herein. SECTION 3 This ordinance shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 5th day of February, 2013. MAYOR ATTEST: • • [SOUTHLAKE 20351 65 [SOUTH LAKE 20351 'Sour .......... J:3� co CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 19th day of February,2013. MAYOR John Terrell ...........ou�H4,1 ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 6k—),- 'e. k- CITY ATTORNEY GATE: ADOPTEU_,,1- EFFECTIVE: EXHIBIT"A" CITY OF Log" SOUTH LAKE SOUTHLAKE —Wy 114OW-SW ROW) mL,.2 0 2 5 —Rath MWM1938(W ROW P.k,."! ZKk W-- -FW 170WW!938(137R0*) AdC 129 khwW A5L.-84 kh�W _A41)-I DO'AAKIN AIL, A40-W AA" —M-KA& Southlake 2025 Plan M 77 A.IS czj 89 cd%.W C21.1 79 WWW Mobility&Master Thoroughfare Plan ....C2U-W WWI Functional Classificabon System of Roadways 7— Adop by Cfty 0wmWkA1 19 M Rawww OSM7 Amer W by Cfty CatmaY May fS 2007 RpsounwO-020 Amended by CJ:y Cwwfl Febnafy 19 20M Amended by Ciry Cm-al*mnibw 18 2006 RaWAAW,0&045 AT,@WW ty Cty C%w-0 DocwtZw 15 2009 Crdrancthb 962 Sceit,-I 5M I fnch-45M feet 430 U56 0 4.50011.1 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 66 [SOUTH LAKE 2035 EXHIBIT "B" L — Crry OF ` _ _ S 0 U T H L A K E SOUTHLAKE - 2025 AT Southlake 2025 Plan Mobility&Master Thoroughfare Plan FuncSonal Classifcatwr. System of Roadways FL �. �.IM I?Nft ISM f,7Y ROM _ _A&,...,..•.� I: �'- � ••. I'' ; 1. — �^ ..fy MD.WM1rr�AZU.WAr-W —C2U-84'CaYaa •C2U-90'Coma c—A[tuf EeynwM ----- i -•..". � - y --- TITT7. —�TT 171+r Sca,�p-1 96X iii 'i 1 ern=900 feet � ... � I Lr �T • • [SOUTHLAKE 20351 67 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] • • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 68 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan APPENDIX C Summary of all Mobility Plan Recommendations Tier 1(1-3 Years) Tier 2(4-6 Years) Tier 3(7+Years) Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Description/issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Traffic Signal at Watermere Dr and Install a SigR@I at CAA 1709- I"o.. plete Rst.n ction a...d. Mebility, Cff�;ent FM1709 PRd�Ai Tnr nrn + Il +inn of+hn I f. + + .n �r ThereaFe afn+.,concerns regaFdiRg 1709/WateF...nrn signal n +. rn,C2 Options 3.5 3.9 �the in+nrnr-+ion of\A/-,+nrrnprn apA �P�^� A4:r4 CAA 1709 Dnririn..+r liVi..n @dj@GefA +nthe in+nrrnn+inn have.J iffir:wl+.. aeGessft Cnn 1709 frnw.-..J ar:en+ neighbE)Fhaods. COMPLETE FM 1938 Phase 2 impreye Pnn 19U to i+ rempin+n n nr+r61-n+inn of the may_ Cffr;^n+ 44� -12-w .J IRrrn@rn +raffir AR wlt6matp r ..,.+in ,i+h Cnn 1934.. ,-+ ..n Ifr-.r+ W.-+Wrn, Mebility �r 1QR4 frAm thn n n.-+rwetinn nf+hn n+nr IPIRGI r=aperl.. edian, r1,r'] I'1ptiG..c 3.5,349 �2 lJ nr+inn+o f 114 in\A/nr+Iake nnludinn im n+r+n �A�^� I nc red r-ed for nrre.nt n ndmf9on +he n nn in+n r.- n+ien of C 1024 -.r.,. CnT17n� COMPLETE Continental Blvd and S Peytonville Construct a roundabout at Complete construction of the W Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Ave Roundabout the intersection of W Continental/S Peytonville Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, Traffic increases in the vicinity of Continental and S roundabout. Design is in C1,C2 Options 3.5,3.9 MT3 Continental and S Peytonville Peytonville. progress. during peak times,school pick up/drop off times,and during heavy use of Koalaty Park. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 1 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Description/issues Recommendations Implementation Metric F17T."IT.7".8 Dove Rd/Peytonville Ave r..mplete GE)RStF +; ..f the�A IVIE)bility; EffiG*PRt 3-4- Rw Roundabout the Of W n,...,. dab- I..fra5tFUGtUF. Mobility 3-.3- Thorn it nifiGanr rraffi 9 on.,+r.nyilln and Sapnr r�r2 Optiens �99 ..+.,rr PGtiA....f nl..r+h D....+.,....ill., nnfiripate 1 alignrnpn+with Sam T cehool Dodd it eGted in the near future a atiRg n way r.f+he in+arse Gtien Pnay -mps if COMPLETE Kirkwood Blvd,Acquisition from may, €f ieient 34-, PW TW King to Tyler public use aIGRg this +ien Kirkwood Rl;,d fr T„le. Strom lnfr-,r+ + r. Mebility 4-3- Thorn it..� -a lack of n nr+iyity-J.,n.. s Ewnnd: to TW Ki. rl,G2 Opt enss i 2.53.0 '� KirLAAd hr.+..ir.nn DAye and SH Acrv^ 4n. COMPLETE Kirkwood Blvd Widening Complete the build aut of Complete nstruiEtion of+h. may_ Eff�ent 34- PW IlirL..,ond❑lyd hn+..,nr.n Stockton +hir rnnfir.n of Kirk...eed nr IlirL..,ond..,idening free Tyler Infrastru G+��re' y �� r,d TyleF it r eRtly 2 I-Res wh4e r, n no 9R r+....+With c+r,.,.++r,c+r..-I.+r...nri..,, r1,G2 I"v Pti,-...r 3 5,9.9 ..+h r Rder..f KirL..,eed it h..Rg other r..�+i....r-.I......+hir A�^� � r. n,; yr,r..rl-, n non. ROW COMPLETE Kirkwood Blvd,Extension from While the majority of the Dependent upon development Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Dove to Highland roadway is anticipated to be and as needs are determined, Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, constructed along with consider public participation in C1,C2 Options 3.5,3.9 MT7 Kirkwood is disconnected between development,participate in the extension of Kirkwood from Dove and Highland. the extension of Kirkwood Dove to Highland. from Dove to Highland as appropriate. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 2 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Description/issues Recommendations Implementation Metric N White Chapel,Emerald to SH114 Improve this segment of N r..mplete GE)RS4611449—R..f the I\I Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Traffic volumes will increase on N White Chapel to its ultimate White Chapel iFnPr,..,,,...ents Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, White Chapel Blvd between cross section. Phase I, from Highland to SH"^ C1,C2 Options 3.5,3.9 Highland and SH 114 as F^",vrc Park construction from the ...-'UdiRg the N Wh*+p naedic;al r'....+..r�Rd.,a;..,.,...+ Highland Roundabout to SH MT8 undeveloped properties designated 114,was completed in 2019. as Mixed Use develop around the Complete construction of Phase Methodist Southlake hospital. II from Emerald to Highland. N White Chapel Blvd,SH 114 to Widen this segment of N Conduct a study of the future Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Dove Rd White Chapel to 4 lanes intersection at N White Chapel Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, Traffic volumes along N White divided by a median,with Blvd and Kirkwood Blvd. C1,C2 Options 3.5,3.9 Chapel Blvd between SH 114 and other agreed improvements MT9 Dove are anticipated to increase as dependent upon and Complete construction of the N 2 Carillon builds out and the property accompanying the Carillon White Chapel improvements between N White Chapel Blvd and development. from SH 114 to Dove. This SH 114 develops. protect will be driven by development. Texas Turnaround r AR#r--.-+a T....-agWgrk 4h TynnT♦o� ..I..+e � i_ Cff GRR+ �� PW Traffic G ..S+i....R++h..cu 114 T--...a...-1.,.J AR th.,@art ri4e +h..G A.R.r41-1G+i.,....f+h..T.,..A.r IR i4. r+u-r- Meb+li-ty 3.rr and N CaFF..II Ave cl,C2 Options 5,,3-.9 Traffic b601l oreurs at+his SH 114 444, AAT due to Gateway Gh��r.-h +i.,i+i..r Anrl ...J#Aff G prejeGt. COMPLETE State St Extension C..+..nd Sta'tp c+r,.,.+frprn !'r... plete RS41i.-+i......fthe mebility, Cffr;-nt a---1- c+a+..c+rpet .d*1 r+...J C.,.J..r�l c+A.,c+..,..+....+.,... I..f.-.S+ 61G+61... N49bility err the Tewn Square develepmeRt, COMPLETE • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 3 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Description/issues Recommendations Implementation Metric F17T."IT.7".8 7tana Rue'(..r Rd/^........rtaF C..+nnd Ri-ekpr Rga d nas++n C Assist in bridging+he flnn.dplaiRmebility,_ Cffpip Rt Rw As Rucker aR d Dra do properties- areAve. IRfra5tFUGtUFnMobility 3-.3- .deyelep +raffin,.nl irm-s an+inipate d to hn D---nLnr extension n r e nn+ r�r2 Options 22 0O expns+n sl+n in -.Inn..CIA n# „t+n 1-s op�^ 1:709_ With si+,. ar+isipatinn COMPLETE S Carroll Ave widening from Breeze Widen this section of S Complete construction of the S Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Way to FM 1709 Carroll Ave to its ultimate 4 Carroll widening from FM 1709 Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, Traffic volumes along S Carroll from lane divided cross section. to Breeze Way. C1,C2 Options 3.5,3.9 MT13 Breeze Way to FM 1709 will increase due to the Winding Creek residential development and future development along FM 1709. Brumlow widening from Widen this section of Complete construction of the Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Continental to SH 26 Brumlow to its ultimate 4 Brumlow widening from Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, Properties adjacent to Brumlow are lane divided cross section. Continental to SH 26. C1,C2 Options 3.5,3.9 mostly undeveloped or MT14 underdeveloped. Traffic volumes are anticipated to increase with the opening of the Municipal Service Center and as adjacent properties develop. N Kimball Ave and E Dove Rd Construct a FOundabouit Complete construction of the N Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Intersection Improvements intersection improvements Kimball/Dove�t Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, Traffic congestion is increasingly at the intersection of N intersection improvements. C1,C2,CBO5 Options 3.5,3.9 MT15 heavy during peak hours at the Kimball and Dove. Handled by Grapevine per intersection of N Kimball and E interlocal agreement. Dove,the only major connection into Grapevine from Southlake north of SH 114. North Kimball Ave impreye N Kimball+n 4,; l'empin+n s ns+r „-+inn of♦hn nl Mebility, Fffri-Rt 3-4- Rw Traffic;velu.rn.es AR N Vi.,�.h�ll A„n i-44Rnatn nrnrr rnn+iAR with Kim haI T IRfFa St FUn+Urn, y �r .. .dh;wp in snsl-, preperties have enter landscaped p dman �2 s 2 g eyelepe d and,.gill non+ins a+n.de s Iarnn u ndeFsleyeleped PF9pnr+ins OR the, e-s+Side-of N Kimball develop fair+her. COMPLETE • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 4 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Description/issues Recommendations Implementation Metric S Village Center Dr Connector Acquire,design,and Complete construction of the Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Traffic volumes are anticipated to construct Village Center Village Center extension from Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, increase along FM 1709 as Drive from Kimball to Nolen. Kimball to Nolen. This protect C1,C2 Options 3.5,3.9 MT17 development occurs. Stacking will be driven by development. along Kimball creates congestion during peak times for school drop- off/pick-up. Nolen Drive!'r.r.ne Eta !'r.r.ne Et then ads to Complete G struiE+ion of+i,e Mobility_ ^Effi1�_�:.h:nt 3r. - PW Nolen Drive ir.So-t J-,Lr.ropy net 'm preve rr...neGtivity issues Nlnl n Gonn.etor 'nfr;#r--r+iir., Mobility 4-3- nn�1oc;ARRL-4+r,nir.i.R nr R CA p Park r�r2 � QptiGRS �9 Gr COMPLETE Bank St Connector Design and construct a Complete construction of the Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW nnni C,,Rnp.+ r or it Gt will prey + roadway connector parallel Bank Street connector. Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, MT19 There is no westbound FM 1709 to FM 1709 to preserve C1,C2 Options 3.5,3.9 access from Nolen Street. An access to commercial alternate route is necessary to businesses. provide access. FM 1709 and Pearson Design and construct Work with Keller to complete Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Improvements Consider^^+iens for construction of y safety and Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, MT20 LOS anticipated to be reduced with intersection improvements mobility improvements at FM C1,C2,CBO4, Options 3.5,3.9 continued development along FM at FM 1709/Pearson in 1709/Pearson. CBO5 1709 and Pearson Lane. partnership with Keller. N Carroll Ave widening from SH Consider the widening of N. Complete the widening and Mobility, Efficient PW 114 to Dove Rd Carroll Ave.from SH 114 to improvements of N.Carroll Infrastructure, Mobility MT21 The level of service is expected to Dove Rd as traffic counts and Avenue.This may occur in C1,C2 Options decrease as Carillon and other level of service warrant. phases. properties adjacent to N.Carroll Avenue continue to develop. FM 1709 Flyover Consider the construction of Complete the construction of Mobility, Efficient PW The level of service has dropped in the FM 1709 Flyover if the the flyover onto westbound FM Infrastructure, Mobility MT22 the past but may have improved level of service and traffic 1709. C1,C2 Options with the DFW Connector Project counts warrant. from the westbound frontage road of S.H.114. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 5 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Description/issues Recommendations Implementation Metric W17T."IT.7".8 G^ is r aeeess �E►c#y icy, i�#isieat 3.�, GAF �5 Infra StF U.-+U }Ability 3r.3� There is li...ited s fer alizatie n+inw; G r�C BC)4 2�2 0O S.,--...L.,�A�rL.,+nl-.,-.,sh.,nni n,. -.'dj@G..n++.,Se-i+hlake r r R+^F nna e. COMPLETE C,..,sia rCenduEt a warrant study toR4eiaility, €f ident 33-.-�, PW Th..r.,is li...ke d access fr.,... ,d..teff.ine if lit signal is s. InfraStFU-tUFe' Mobility �3- r+ins aleng Player Girde and- alizatie n+iens n d G!,G2,CB9 Options 22 9 ..4 nA a d A. s AAIa r1.a +ra ffi,-.,. n4 J��m e,, C 9709] 114..-.deydarl( oA�^ Fnn 170Q COMPLETE FM 1938 and W Continental Design and construct Complete construction of Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Intersection Improvements intersection improvements intersection improvements at Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, Increased traffic volumes on FM at CGRsider fi r.n+inns fer Ian., GeRd lGt study s.f the FM C1,C2,CB04 Options 3.5,3.9 MT25 1938,connecting to SH 114 and ^R ^„ ati^..,...++h 1938/W Continental Continental Blvd. ^+..rs +i.)....f^^ ) FM 1938 and ^+^r,eet,^+i^^ W Continental. Dove and Kirkwood Intersection Consider signalization OF Complete construction of Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Improvements ether+raffis management intersection improvements at Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, Traffic volumes will increase as .J..•,i,- ++h++h^Design and C;ARd-irt a study^f+h^ C1,C2,CBO4 Options 3.5,3.9 MT26 property to the south develops and construct intersection of Dove/Kirkwood the intersection is built for the Dove and Kirkwood. continuous connection of Kirkwood. Carroll and Highland Traffic CGRsider r.n+iens fer traffic GeRd „-+-. study of the nlmelaility,_ Fffr;^n+ Management Study managemeRt ++h., r-.rr..Il�ui,.hl�..,J(Kirl(,.,E)ed).. IRfra-stru tore y �r CarilIAR and Gateway Ghweh, ,i II ^+..r,;P4i.. f III QIFF.II R.., r`J +,.r, ^+i...,T r�r r'] rQnn r 44T-27 ^+r-.ffi^-.nd s+-.sl.i n„at this Highland(KirL..,.,..4 ..nt rr, -er-^+i.,n as then er+ie-s RG!U ling installation of l- deve COMPLETE • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 6 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Description/issues Recommendations Implementation Metric F17T."IT.7".8 Federal Way traffic light G,,....id r aliZAVA....f N Ir,r+all+h.,light r al r r+h. may_ PffipipRt 3-4- Rw Fede Fal Way rtl.. Way IRfraStFUCt UineMobility 3r.3-, Gengested as Teen Square patrGps nt rT r-- +--rn Ia p r1 r,CQnn Options �9 AAT-28 tFy-te t61FR left en "NI QrTGll. -Safety COMPLETE Zena Rucker and S.Carroll CORGIUEt a WaFFaRt study for I....,I,,...ent inn rr,.,.tia may_ Efficient 3-4- {W Improvements a signal atS Carpel I/Rucker e +r as e..ded. Infr-,c+ ---r++---re- Mebility 4-3- As th..r -4hwL-#GArRpr r.f Cnn d., vrt (n..+i..r,])i..+h..Vi...l.,., Her., r'1 r^1�rQnn +;,-...c �g nn�7o 7 ..1no PId Carrel' Ave d......leps .,.,.,d1......�eRt and i .,I....-eRt �A�^� ,.,hirl.,-, nd .,..tc., r+hr, c+��d..f..r-,li+cirtr,-,I at the +r-,ffiG is aRtiGir.-,+.,.J +udy'S fi...JongS 'ntPrc.,rt0nn of S Carroll A.,., and COMPLETE Ze..-, o L.r R r Kimball and Kirkwood Traffic Consider options for traffic Conduct a study of the N Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Management Study management at the Kimball/Kirkwood intersection. Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, MT30 Increased traffic volumes as intersection of Kirkwood and C1,C2,CBO4 Options 3.5,3.9 properties adjacent to SH 114 and N Kimball. Kimball Ave develop. Kimball and SHIIA Traffic G-e..cider eptiens fer lane ('en roue to study the N melaility,_ Ffficmpn+ 44�1 RW MaRa.......eR%St„d.. ..fi.WatiAW;Rtth., Kipnla.l!/SH 114 it+..rr.,�+ir...fr.r I..fr-.r+ 61G41re y �r 9 S4 Rter,;P4iGR of Inl Kimlaall/cu ption. , AATAJ PFE)PeFty develops to the nr+hnc+ Increased n c.c+ic... 'I n vPTrvTr ,., GILIFiRg Gateway Church sprvirp-,; ..d 4i.,i+i.. COMPLETE Kimball and FA. 7no Traffin may_ Cffi�i.,..+ �� � Management St„ y Ge nfig6i ratio ++h., Ki.a.ball/Cnn 9709 Infrastru Gture' y 4-� Traffic-vel u .,ill i nr as the ntprenn+ion of CPA 9709 and /"9 / oT!'Q nAnn Ilv.+ii.ns 2�2 O COMPLETE Ordinance No.1075-C [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 7 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Description/issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Kimball and Village Center Traffic Consider signalization or Conduct a study of the S Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Management Study other traffic management Kimball/Village Center Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, Traffic volumes will increase as the devices at the intersection of intersection. C1,C2,CBO4 Options 3.5,3.9 MT33 properties located along S Kimball S Kimball and the Village Ave develop and create congestion Center Drive extension. during peak times and during school operations on the west side of S Kimball. Kimball and Continental Traffic CeRsider signalization Gend iGt a stud„of+hn c may_ Cffc;^ + 44� {-W Management Study RplabA,4 A ^+her traffic; 146pnbalVE Ge,+,..^Rtal I..frast ,,etur^ y � rnn+inupd 4I MaRageFRPRt Pi++hn n+nr r+inn+0,.., r)r-Qnn {gp3 } eyelnpmen+a im nd+h '..+n r�n�+inn of c KM....h-,II-,n.J i 4 ..J..+n in r„n+inpntal aI.+i..-a tUFning nn+n c Kimball COMPLETE Traffic Management Options Consider traffic Explore options to add a traffic Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW As signals are installed and management options management service. Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, maintained by the city,current staff through internal staffing or Performance Options 3.5,3.9 MT35 will need to be responsive to traffic contracted services. Management management issues. and Service Delivery,C1, C2,CBO4 Pedestrian Safety and Vehicle Work with DPS to determine Assess existing speed limits and Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PDS,PW, Speeds locations where speeding is modify them where appropriate. Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, DPS Current speeds along may rights-of- high and to assess existing I Ipdat^T..,ffi,.r..l^,i^^o^Ii,.•, Performance Options, 3.5,3.9 way are higher than appropriate for speed limits. r^^Si ^r R^�'�^d Management Pedestrian the designated classification. High prieritize apprepriate Create a prieriti7pri 10#of and Service Design speeds create safety concerns, Ier-atiens;fer+raffiG Galw.iRg I +inns apprGpriate fer+raffiG_ Delivery,C1, especially for locations highly- +n achi^.,^do-sired speeds Galming retrefits. Encourage C2 MT36 trafficked by pedestrians. +hr^Ugh ^ ^ ^ ^ 'deSi^^ speed-appropriate designs in Incerperate+raffie Galming new ROW construction through +^,.hniques ,l^n,.new RQWs the review process. rnn.-irinr a est Sharing n f.,r n ghh..rhnnGIS r nS+in.. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] $ [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Description/issues Recommendations Implementation Metric FIT-T."Y111"Im AeFial I ighti Rg StaR aFdS C..r fi 4--re arterial ligh+iRg Adept a ligh+iRg r+a...dar.d� ter+ may_ EffGi.,..+ Dnc D\A/ ..+r nh.,.,s., E)f the Mobility MaSteF Plan andI..fra5tFUGtUFe }Ability 3r3- arterial rights of way+n Pnee+ hn+.yee.,G llwing nr evaluate the G llwinn and DnrfArMRnC-,.,nn Optiens 22 9 al A ASHTO nri+nria an n ,Jd. nr+he chnnhn..fi..+,-rn� ..w'th the chnnhn fixtures fnr-.n.,n �A@RagerReR+ � Sauthialk.I igh+iRg(l.rdiRa RGn nifin-,+i.RSGGRIA14PRt arterial ligh+iRg i ..+� ...d c.,r.,in., FesideRtial with the r+r.,.,+hgh+i.... n.,li....r.. C- , �T av -.il-.hili+.,of fiv+��r ..+hn nlnn+rin r+-....dar.ds Add r+rnn+ TXDQT ROW 61+ility standard menus. ligh+inn+n arterials;...i+h new COMPLETE RQW Rt r ets. r..r.,.i,d r eth r,d nr.r.,+iye pele-s mailable fr....-..,I.,n+rin PfOVWeFS. GA-Rdl-16-t RR RRRIYS4S OR existing far safety Illuminated Street Signage Inr+-ll iilurni -,+n,d +rnn+ rempin+n install,+inn at n istinn may_ Cffrin.,+ 34� -12-W ..�. al Need fnr i ve safety and signalized n-.lizn.d in+nrrnn+inner-.Inns Infrastru n+urnMebility 4-3- .,� finrlin,. .-@+key in+nrrn +innn ...+nr .-+in..r n CA 17nQ I.,clu do ill--..-.inate.d PprfArrnanec- QPtiGRS 245,2 O the installation of'llum*nated st any fUtUlFe SigRals within the d SeWiEe Gi Delivery_Q,, COMPLETE � Property Access Management Develop a new Driveway Adopt a new Driveway Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PDS,PW The city's current Driveway Ordinance reflecting current Ordinance. Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, Ordinance is out of date and does best practices to ensure Performance Options 3.5,3.9 MT39 not adequately meet needs for proper access to new Management access management. development. and Service Delivery,C1, C2 D..ni.d.,..+n iR I Pike Weed Anr..n, Gemplete study. may_ EffGi.,..+ 3-4-., PDS,D ,d Seuth View,and Pexberaugh n+nrrn0 nn heyd the-, Infrastru n+��rn y �� inhhnrhnn.ds have.diffinu lty be.deyelnnn.d+n imprGve Dnrfn -.-.n.,nn T s 2.5,349 nr+hbe �n.d Garrnll Ave fnr Inn-.I r �i.dnn+� 4AT A.,.,�...J.d''..+.,+h..i..r+�Il�+i.,.. f n.,li....r.. !'1 �Ti medians an Cnn 1709. COMPLETE • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 9 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Description/issues Recommendations Implementation Metric W17T."IT.7".8 FM 1938 Name Dir^�err^ .,i+h Parr rdiRaRe. tablishi.. IVIE)bility,G2, Cffipi^^+ g 7 P-W TheFe aFe the stale.hol.d..rr-, d rl^+^�...i..., RaFRe f..r F.M. 1938, .i+hi.. 32,-134 Mobility leGal Ramong of C INA 1QU-+h., I.,^-,I^ r,for C INA 1QU so,-+hlakp and for+hr,Ra...J.,IOptiens .,a.Jway Gh-.r ge,;frern Drr.rinr+ and.fer+hp Randel Mill M.iII"hPRd!L I i ^kA/..r+IRL..+..DA...J..I Mill Southlake. In additieR,the Y.I.,tmen of C MA 1934 ner+h of COMPLETE(no name change) Deceleration Lanes at Southridge Install deceleration lanes on Construct decelerations lanes at Mobility, Efficient 3.1, PW Lakes and Byron Nelson Southlake Blvd at Southridge the intersections of Southlake Infrastructure, Mobility 3.3, MT42 Traffic flow on Southlake Blvd is Lakes Pkwy and Byron Blvd(FM 1709)and Southridge C1,C2 Options 3.5,3.9 impeded by motorists turning right Nelson Blvd. Lakes Pkwy and Byron Nelson onto Southridge Lakes Pkwy and Blvd. Project is under design. Byron Nelson Blvd. :rFaffi..Calming Managemen Reym y. eUr Pnt traffic Update to^ pnt trafficmebility,_ Cffiri^..+ 44�1 lRW T-F affie Ga IRgi...... s ha.,.. managemeRt pelieies fe management pelieies ..,-tiding Safetyy :3.2,-9.9 seveFal heRefi+r U^hPE)IOGY I'1PtiG..r PedeStFian and bicyclist safety, t Faffi^ca'.................. TFaffi Q �A�^� d eGreasing traffi^^ and G-ens;Wer r s;We..+i-,l as .r,ll COMPLETE appl+sati9RS. Electric Vehicle Recharge Stations "^,^^d.the 7..^i^^QFdi^.,^..^W Mobility, B6 Efficient 6.2, PDS AS electric vehicles become more ria^^+i-1^har.giRg PIl..,.,.,..hi^le Ghar.gi..g Sta+i....r Mobility 7.3,7.6 popular,fh^r^will h^ demand for stations as apse. C�si,d^r ^r+-,i^diStri^fs. Options eR r�cn` rrmdential charging stations I EED guidelines f^r Continue to explore within Southlake will continue to ^,^^d^�'^ -rnh^r^f opportunities for electric vehicle MT44 increase. r.—..+1., ^^ ^rind^^+i-.l StAti^^.-f..r A ri+^ Continue recharge stations in public and ^harging statiens;are not an to explore opportunities for private development where ,IIAwPd electric vehicle recharge appropriate. stations in public and private development where appropriate. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 10 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Description/issues Recommendations Implementation Metric FIT-T."Y111"Im TFX Rawl If then erties at the ale..,.tin.,. n.de.d i nlerr �, �1 1 ,o.g S Y The TC Dail n „tar rail nroi notnterseetwen of Brumiew andthe properties at the Q�-.I�t.. Mobility nn ncPnev .d al a ferwar an the desert c H 26 a .d ree„eleee.J the •nterreetien of nr, mlaw and �YET/ Optiens proporead stations,..ill he leruate.d ie possibility of a rail station S LJ 76 a re.deyeleee.d F^raee,.iee and nlerth Di.-hlae.d Wills ,he sidereal SH 114 Improvements—Frontage Road '. Prepare a^^°^^ge"eF"ties '.Complete the engineering StUdy Mobility, Efficient 3.1,3.6, PW between Dove and W and^^^i^^^ri^^plans Fer the SH fer the SH 114 Fr ^t,^^_ead and Infrastructure Mobility 3,8 Kirkwood/Intersection Improvements "A fr^^ta^^Fead and Famp andC1,C2 options 3.10 and signalization at SH114/Kirkwood ^^I..a.^^ eht@i^the^^^a^a Fight of way fe 6.1 ntersectien ..h.,th.......J F CV 7e'I revernents at and\A/ ...Korl ...e.d Qlwd with thedr .. .deyele....eRt of the TD ArRpr4r^.d.. '] CU^a^...d i t^II+raffia. all^ prepeFty ..d the f.�tW a,J...,elel.........t..F 7 Instal!♦raffle signals n the fu th,.cu 11 A.....J W V:rI...,nnH the Wilke,;RRd Veri.r. IpFepeFties114 R..rl W Virkw r..dprier tn a siai#ifiratp r.f FesultiRg i^ ea tr^ffie yniu mpg.. iRtPF9P9tiRRy fer Dhagp'I TI) `"'.KiFIO.Vged QI••a^^a,,^^r pd Ieye4 Design and engineering and the A._.^ tFade of ^e at I,ey;^ter..e^tin,...in the installation of traffic signals at Design and engineering and the MT46 area the SH 114 and W.Kirkwood installation of traffic signals at the intersection have been SH 114 and W.Kirkwood Traffic volumes have increased on Dove completed. intersection have been completed. St.and W.Kirkwood Blvd.with development in the area and are r. Complete construction of 3- Complete construction of expected to increase further with future Cetruet the SH 114 frontage Cam,^t the frontage road and development of the Wilkes property. road and intersection remaining intersection improvements per the approved improvements. engineering plan. Construction of the frontage road will allow employees and patrons of nearby businesses access to SH 114 without having to navigate local roads. • [SOUTHLAKE 20351 11 • Mobility Master Plan Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Ref. VGO Priority Responsible Description/Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VNT Link No. Tie Tier Department _. AmeFitFade cepperateeffice - COMPLETE T-FaffiG Signal at TW King and W I-affie signal at the W; install the traffiG signal at the mebility, PLW pFGpeFmty and - - - - COMPLETE the - - - --mf the Statp rtFppt a-- GFRRitP Ph.I nffiee develepmeRt RRdinoteFsertmof the bleek 12 -- the aFeR gheAd be - -- -tFaffie impFevements implemented COMPLETE Ordinance No.3075-C [SOUTHLAKE 20351 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Description/issues Recommendations Implementation Metric n ebil:ty is the..u...1....ene gap t:..n eyaluatmen pfejeets by the end of Cy 7n17 the 2015 r:+:z,..,cu..,,.., n. ...1 Fl-'..a. ..a,.a FU..a: sueh the City is ra..dweting aR i..................RtS tL...Wgh the !'it.:.Capital IFAPF...,.....ent I^� ❑h.. TWTF�^ITTCCr,B ..luat:.n of I..... City's Capital I......eye t Plan tl+...u..hout the Qty a deteFFRiRe iF ..L.,.....RGI t,.:.. TCV4 T�7 ity and level of sewke eapae COMPLETE Shady Oaks/Highland Intersection Evaluate intersection Construct intersection Mobility, Efficient 3.1,3.6, PW Improvements improvement options and improvements. Infrastructure Mobility 33g MT51 Increased traffic has reduced the level implement recommended C1,C2 Options 3.10 of service of the Shady Oaks/Highland improvements. 6.1 intersection. 0 In Conjunction with TXDOT—Conduct a Conduct a study to determine Based on study findings—create a Mobility, Efficient 3.1,3.6, PW Study on SH114 Main Lane Expansion cost and construction feasibility. CIP project request and project Infrastructure Mobility 33g and Ramp Reversals Between Kimball timeline for the implementation of C1,C2 options 3.10 Avenue and White Chapel Boulevard the project. 6.1 Reversing ramps will allow for increased accessibility to properties along the MT52 frontage road;improve safety by 2 moving the traffic"weaving area" — between an entrance ramp and exit ramp from the main lanes to the frontage road,where speeds and volumes are lower;and reduce traffic congestion at intersections by allowing through traffic to access the highway. • [SOUTHLAKE 20351 13 [SOUTHLAKE 20351 Mobility MasterPlan Southlake Thoroughfare Recommendations Tier 1 Tier 2 ...� • Tier 3 r..........j • ........... j O.T. ■ • MT52 dououou p�..................... • • .... I '•`. . : ..... ..................�., _f• •••�Y N t•. Z.. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 14 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Intersection • .city Improvement Recommendations Recommendation/Description IntersecStrategic Link ®� IC1. Add crosswalk signs to all crosswalks. IC1 IC3. Add; k curb ramps Mobility, IC3 with detectable warning surfaces Continental Blvd @ White Chapel Blvd Infrastructure, 3.2 for the north,east and westbound C1,C2 approaches Investigate need to build out to a two-lane roundabout, needs Mobility, IC80 further study for geometric layout Continental Blvd @ White Chapel Blvd Infrastructure, 3.1,3.9 C1,C2 and ROW impacts IC2. Add CIF curb ramps to the northwest and southwest IC2 corners Mobility, IC13 IC13. Install two directional curb Carroll Ave @ Highland St/Kirkwood Blvd Infrastructure, 3.3 ramps aligned with crosswalks on C1,C2 the northeast and southeast corners • Investigate option of installation of roundabout or intersection signalization Mobility, IC74 • Investigate need to construct a Carroll Ave @ Highland St/Kirkwood Blvd Infrastructure, 3.1,3.9 right turn bay on the C1,C2 westbound approach (interim improvement) IC4. Add CIF curb ramps with detectable warning surfaces on the northwest and southwest Mobility, IC4 corners Peytonville Ave/Southridge Lakes Pkwy @ Infrastructure, 3.3 IC14 IC14. Install two directional curb Peytonville Ave/Raven Bend Ct C1,C2 ramps on the northeast and southeast corners IC5. Add sin curb ramps Mobility, IC5 with detectable warning surfaces Shady Oaks Dr @Highland St/Turnberry Infrastructure, 3.3 IC17 to the three remaining corners Ln C1,C2 0 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 15 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Intersection • .city Improvement Recommendations Recommendation/Description Intersection(s) Strategic Link MM IC17. Move crosswalk in front of the stop sign and install two directional curb ramps on the southwest corner in Install curb ramps for all Mobility, IC12 Continental Blvd @ Peytonville Ave Infrastructure, 3.9 approaches,signing and striping C1,C2 Per Lease" a adequate seght r„+anr-p f c +hlBlvd h ( nn :709) n Villa.+ Mobility, n &F �2 COMPLETE IC18 Investigate need to Gene Mobility, n ^h^„+^Y ^l;,^ Continental Blvd @ Byron Nelson Pkwy Infrastructure, 3.2 ;Pct, for-intersection IC75 do+^,, ^n C1,C2 improvements. Rebuild appropriate pedestrian Mobility, IC32 accommodations per completed Continental Blvd @ Byron Nelson Pkwy Infrastructure, 3.3 intersection study C1,C2 RP ..+.,..-.,..+�..., .. .,C.. +hl-.L., COMPLETE2 EF ^ ^� D..-...i.J.,.- alk S+.i.,i.,..a SA-i-+hlake Blvd iFnn 9�n01 !l !`.,..-...�..,..-.,C+ / �7 �� the.,^S+h n J h gateway hr I f. + „+ r IC27 IC27. Provide curb ramps on the Mobility, IC34 three corners that do not currently Dove Rd @ Shady Oaks Dr Infrastructure, 3.9 have curb ramps. C1,C2 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 16 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Intersection • .city Improvement Recommendations Recommendation/Description Intersection(s) Strategic ALL Link MM IC34. Rebuild directional curb ramps on the southeast corner. Mebility K49 Seuthlake QL.J (FIVI 9709) @ Sh-,.J..Oaks DF IRfrartr-4--re, r C2 Rebuild appropriate pedestrian Mobility, IC33 accommodations for modified Continental Blvd @ Carroll Ave Infrastructure, 3.3 roundabout layout C1,C2 Investigate need to construct a two-lane roundabout, needs Mobility, IC76 further study for geometric layout Continental Blvd @ Carroll Ave Infrastructure, 3.1,3.9 2 C1,C2 and ROW impacts IC36. Reconstruct two directional curb ramps aligned with IC36 crosswalks on all corners Mobility, IC72 IC72. Place ped push buttons at Carroll Ave @ Zena Rucker Rd Infrastructure, 3.2 C1,C2 landing of each barrier free pedestrian ramp IC41. Relocate PED push buttons to ADA compliant landings. IC42. Relocate PED signal heads closer to crosswalk. IC41 IC44. Remove split phasing for IC42 minor approaches and run Mobility, IC44 protected+permitted for all Continental Blvd @ Davis Blvd Infrastructure, 3.3 IC71 approaches C1,C2 IC71. Wait until construction at Davis and FM 1709 is finished, then follow up with additional traffic counts to identify additional infrastructure improvements. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 17 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Intersection • .city Improvement Recommendations Recommendation/Description Intersection(s) Strategic Link MM IC43. Relocate the pedestrian push button to ADA compliant Mr landings IC55. Retime for eastbound traffic IC43 on Continental Blvd to have more Mobility, IC55 Continental Blvd @ Kimball Ave Infrastructure, time IC56 C11 C2 IC56. Right turn overlap for northbound right turns with westbound left turns, install sign prohibiting westbound u-turns Replace detectable warning Mobility, SH 114 Eastbound Frontage Road @State IC45 surfaces to cover full width of curb Infrastructure, 3.9 ramp on both existing curb ramps St C1,C2 Nelsen PI(w y /nia.m.on d- -AIyd ReStFipe all eFesswalks and Ave /C QL.C r.��+hl-.L., Blvd AA 97n01 /l!`r.w.r.,.,r.-., �g Steph-.rr+..-,ligR With R �rla � IRfFa StFHrtwe 34 Aire • c uthlake Blvd (Pna 1799) n nl l R nr • Sauthlake Blvd /Cnn 97001 /l T.-.weF • Sauthlake Blvd «nn 1709) n Village rQAUQrr Dr • Sauthlake Blvd /Cnn 97001 /l White Chapel Blvd • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 18 • Mobility Master Plan Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations Strategic Priority ID Recommendation/Description Intersections) Link VGO Tier e Sewthlake Blvd (FM .. @ PeaFSO e Southlake Blvd (PM .. .., .. Restripe Gresswalks and step Ave Mobility, 4c-" te align with new r=6lFb FaFnp- 9 Southial(e Blvd (PM 1:7C)q) @ Shady Qal(s I yte .. ., r, „- IC-54 frem left,shared left threugh right Seuithlake R-.Ivd (FM .• n r, ■ .., appFeaches Deve Rd Shady Oaks ■ .• n $ .• „ CemmerGe St Mebility, @ Mebility, K-65 stepbaFs Pe,to.Mile Ave Raven Rend GA IRfFaStFUetwe, 34 Ordinance No.1075-C • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Intersection • .city Improvement Recommendations Recommendation/Description Intersection(s) Strategic Link MM Irfr-,I + G++ ramps 'so Q,G2 C+rir,e the G -,II.-;A J r.,5+4pe -SH 114 Cr....+age Q..-,.J @l State Mebility, W-6-7 the stepbaT -St lnfFastruiEtUlFe, so r•I,C2 2 Stripe the c f;;IL,; ;; r Mebility_ 4G" sewth east ar..J. P-AhAlInd fleye Rd /l White Chapel QL..J L.fr��+ ���+��... c,G2 Tries, h--chpc;An+hr. .Arthwp� --+ K-7-9 eemeF+r. r ide adequate sight Se-Ahlake QL.J (CAA 9:709) @ Garrell UP IRfrar+sr.+ �r.. 34 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 20 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Intersection • .city Improvement Recommendations Recommendation/Description IntersecStrategic Link ®� G r+rW et a Fight WFR bay R-*the f6ArInatien) beth r ght t6jrn end Ieft b irn bays fer the easthe,-nd appFeach bay,Well FequiFe ali,.r..A eRt C,C2 Gerners .,Sthe-Und- turn bay past first ,driveway Blvd (CIVI 9709) afte nr+r n+i.,n,..,rL h-,r fin��hnrl COMPLETE • Investigate need to construct two directional curb ramps aligned with crosswalks on all Mobility, IC78 Continental Blvd @ Kimball Ave Infrastructure, 3.1,3.9 corners C1,C2 • Investigate need to extend westbound left turn bay length • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 21 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Intersection • .city Improvement Recommendations Recommendation/Description IntersecStrategic Link om Mobility, 9 r.,.,+ir..,r,+-,l ❑L,.d @ PeVt.,r,.,ill. Ave lnfr-,s+ + „- Z333.9 address queue bad(ups) G!,G2 COMPLETE • Investigate need to construct a roundabout, requires further Mobility, IC81 study for geometric layout and Dove Rd @ Shady Oaks Dr Infrastructure, 3.1,3.9 ROW impact and coordination C1,C2 with TxDOT • Investigate need to construct Mobility, IC82 three curb ramps;two for the Dove Rd @ White Chapel Blvd Infrastructure, 3.1,3.9 southbound approach and one C1,C2 for the eastbound approach • Investigate Reed te-c-vn--crud nerth-he-und right tuFn bay (based 9R RQWr this likel i r,..r.l...,�';h*46Rg ReFthbo R d Shady Oaks DF/:.l HighlaR d St /T��mlaerr.. �, fC$3 IRfra-#r- t 33. ,3..9 � �2 nvLnr r h.,+h a -,rhns+., r COMPLETE F"r Recommendation Intersection(s) Strategic 1h— Link TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations ®M Change eastbound and westbound Mobility, IC6 left turns to protected only Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave Infrastructure, 3.2 C1,C2 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 22 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations Recommendation Intersection(s) Strategic ®� Change minor street phasing from Mobility, IC7 split phase to protected+ Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Pearson Ln Infrastructure, 3.6,3.9 permitted C1,C2 Consider flashing beacon system Mobility, Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @Commerce St/ IC8 for crosswalks for school children Gateway Dr Infrastructure, 3.3 since traffic signal isn't warranted Cl;C2 Give eastbound left turn Mobility, IC9 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave Infrastructure, 3.2 movement more time C1,C2 Give eastbound left turn Mobility, IC10 movement more time from the Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Kimball Ave Infrastructure, 3.2 westbound through C1,C2 Give southbound left turn phase and westbound left turn phase Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Peytonville Mobility, IC11 Infrastructure, 3.2 more time during the school peak Ave C1,C2 in a special school timing plan Mobility, IC20 Prohibit u-turns on all approaches Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave Infrastructure, 3.9 C1,C2 Prohibit westbound left turns from Mobility, IC21 Main St onto Carroll Ave Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave Infrastructure, 3.9 C1,C2 Provide Audible Pedestrian System Mobility, IC22 (APS) push buttons for the Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Tower Blvd Infrastructure, 3.2, eastbound approach crossing C1,C2 • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Byron Mobility, IC23 Provide count down PED signal Nelson Pkwy/Diamond Blvd Infrastructure, 3.2,3.3 heads for all crossings • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave Cl;C2 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 23 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations Recommendation Intersection(s) Strategic Link ®� • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Central Ave • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Commerce St/Gateway Dr • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Nolen Dr • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Peytonville Ave • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Shady Oaks Dr • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Village Center Dr • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Waterford Dr/Southridge Lakes Pkwy • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ White Chapel Blvd Provide count down PED signal Mobility, IC24 heads for EB and WB approaches Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Pearson Ln Infrastructure, 3.3 C1,C2 Provide count down PED signal Mobility, IC25 heads for the eastbound approach Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Tower Blvd Infrastructure, 3.3 crossing C1,C2 Provide curb ramps, push buttons, count down PED signal heads and Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Watermere Dr Mobility, IC28 Infrastructure, 3.2,3.9 striped crosswalk for westbound /Jellico Cir C1,C2 approach Provide one curb ramp for the Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Commerce St/ Mobility, IC30 Infrastructure, 3.9 northeast and southeast corners Gateway Dr C1,C2 Provide two directional curb Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Commerce St/ Mobility, IC31 ramps on the northwest and Gateway Dr Infrastructure, 3.9 southwest corners C1,C2 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 24 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations Recommendation Intersection(s) Strategic ®� Reconstruct ramp on outside of Mobility, IC35 slip turn lane on northwest corner Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Kimball Ave Infrastructure, 3.9 C1,C2 • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Byron ' Nelson Pkwy/Diamond Blvd • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Central Ave • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Commerce Reconstruct two directional curb Mobility, St/Gateway Dr IC36 ramps aligned with crosswalks on � Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @Nolen Dr Infrastructure, 3.2 all corners C1,C2 • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Tower Blvd • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Village Center Dr • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ White Chapel Blvd • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Pearson Ln Reconstruct two directional curb • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Peytonville Mobility, IC37 ramps aligned with crosswalks on Ave Infrastructure, 3.2 each corner • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Waterford C1,C2 Dr/Southridge Lakes Pkwy Reconstruct two directional curb ramps aligned with crosswalks on Mobility, IC38 the northeast and southeast Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Shady Oaks Dr Infrastructure, 3.2 C1,C2 corners Reconstruct two directional curb ramps aligned with crosswalks on Mobility, IC39 the southeast and southwest Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Kimball Ave Infrastructure, 3.2 C1,C2 corners Reconstruct two directional curb Mobility, IC40 ramps on all corners aligned with Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave Infrastructure, 3.2 crosswalks C1,C2 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 25 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations Recommendation Intersection(s) Strategic JL- Link ®� Restrict northbound and Mobility, IC46 southbound u-turns Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Nolen Dr Infrastructure, 3.9 C1,C2 Restrict northbound and Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ White Chapel Mobility, IC47 southbound u-turns by installing Blvd Infrastructure, 3.9 signs Cl;C2 Retime and fine tune to be coordinated with FM 1709 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Davis Blvd/ Mobility, IC53 corridor upon construction Randol Mill Ave Infrastructure, 3.9 completion C1,C2 • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Byron Nelson Pkwy/Diamond Blvd • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Central Ave • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Commerce St/Gateway Dr • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Kimball Ave • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Nolen Dr Ret • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Pearson Ln Mobility, IC54 Davis/ FM 1l Mill corridor after . Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Peytonville Infrastructure, 3.9 Davis/Randol Mill construction Ave Cl;C2 • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Shady Oaks Dr • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Tower Blvd • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Village Center Dr • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Waterford Dr/South ridge Lakes Pkwy • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Watermere Dr/Jellico Cir • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 26 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan 0 RecommendationLink MM Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ White Chapel Blvd 90 RE • Run a southbound right/ Mobility, A IC57 eastbound left overlap and • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave Infrastructure, 3.9 restrict eastbound u-turns C1,C2 • Run a southbound right turn/ eastbound left turn overlap • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Kimball Mobility, IC58 Infrastructure, 3.9 and restrict u-turns on all Ave C1,C2 approaches • Run Protected+ Permitted for minor approaches(phasing • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Central Mobility, IC59 Infrastructure, 3.9 changes might require a new Ave C1,C2 cabinet) • Develop special school plan e Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Shady Oaks Mobility, IC60 with modified traffic timing Dr Infrastructure, 3.9 splits C1,C2 • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Byron Nelson Pkwy/Diamond Blvd • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Central Ave • Place ped push buttons at • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Commerce Mobility, St/Gateway Dr IC72 landing of each barrier free . Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @Nolen Dr Infrastructure, 3.2,3.3 2 pedestrian ramp C1,C2 • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Pearson Ln • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Peytonville Ave • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Shady Oaks Dr • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Tower Blvd • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 27 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan TXDOT Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations Recommendation Intersection(s) Strategic Link ®� - • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Village Center Dr • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Waterford Dr/South ridge Lakes Pkwy • Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ White Chapel Blvd • Place ped push buttons at Mobility, IC73 landing of each barrier free Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Kimball Ave Infrastructure, 3.2,3.3 2 pedestrian ramp for southeast C1,C2 and southwest corners • Consider extension of southbound right turn bay either by ROW acquisition or lane shifting option shown in Mobility, IC84 past Kimley-Horn project Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Carroll Ave Infrastructure, 3.9 • Investigate widening of C1,C2 intersection to the north to construct dual eastbound and westbound left turn bays • Consider protected only eastbound and westbound left Mobility, IC85 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Central Ave Infrastructure, 3.9 turns due to inadequate sight C1,C2 distance • Investigate construction of northbound left turn bay(160') and restripe northbound approach to left and through- Mobility, IC86 right as seen in plans provided Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ Pearson Ln Infrastructure, 3.9 by the City C1,C2 • Investigate construction of southbound left turn bay(130') and restripe southbound • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 28 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan 0 RecommendationLink MM approach to left,through, and right • Investigate construction of southbound right turn bay and restripe the original right turn lane to be a through lane(cost prohibitive) Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) @ White Chapel Mobility, IC87 Investigate extension of Blvd Infrastructure, 3.9 C1,C2 northbound left turn bay approximately 100'to create a ribbon median back to back with another left turn bay • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 29 [SOUTHLAKE 20351 Mobility Master Plan LEGEND r.. �•.� Signed Route(Tier III)* Bicycle Facility *Signage should be placed on Master Plan Kirkwood only after a continuous i �. roadway section is completed 3 �'�•.� (Kimball Ave.to SH 114) -Signed(Tier 1) iveoe oN Dedicated Bike Lane(Tier III) Signed Routes(Tier 1) 0 �• z '�• 3 � j _� J 114 ' N' .1 I w +: � 1 w Z ° f 'HIGHLAND ST a o Q AL 4 i f--••FLORENCERD-••— _.Y O K JOHNSON RD W SOUTHLAKE BLVD E SOUTHLAKE BLVD W ` •` I u r V w m--UNIOM CHURCH•RD+ W CONTINENTAL BLVD 3 E CONTINENTAL BLVD �n �•.i•_..�,.�� '1.�r1' 1, �: 1 1' 'v•'m Ordinance No.1075-C [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 30 [SOUTHLAKE 20351 Mobility Master Plan Bicycle Facility Plan Recommendations MEN • .- . Recommendation 1. W. Bob Jones Road Between T.W. King and N.White Chapel Signed Route 2. T.W. King Road Between Kirkwood and W. Bob Jones Signed Route 3. Dove Road Between Westlake city limits and Grapevine city limits Signed Route(Existing)* 4. Carroll Avenue Between Continental and Burney Lane Signed Route(Existing)* 5. Burney Lane Between Carroll and Midway Drive Signed Route 6. Midway Drive Between Burney Lane and Grapevine city limits Signed Route 7. Continental Boulevard/Union Church Between Pearson and Kimball Signed Route(Existing)* 8. Brumlow Avenue Between Continental and S.H.26 Signed Route(Existing)* 9. Peytonville Avenue Between Continental and Dove Signed Route(Existing)* 10. Randol Mill Avenue(F.M. 1938) Between Florence and Westlake city limits Signed Route(Existing)* 11. Florence Road Between F.M. 1938 and Pearson Signed Route 12. Pearson Lane Between Union Church and Florence Signed Route 13.White Chapel Boulevard Between Continental and northern roadway terminus Signed Route(Existing)* Description Recommendation 14. Brumlow Avenue Between Continental and S.H.26 Dedicated Bike Lane 15. Kirkwood Boulevard Between Kimball and S.H. 114 Signed Route** *Existing and new signage locations should be reviewed/reassessed to ensure optimal signage placement **Signage should be placed on Kirkwood only after a continuous roadway section is completed(Kimball Ave. to SH 114) • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 31 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk ConstructionPriority Tier 1 Only Primary • Length Street/Location Estimated Cost North side connecting dead 7* Union Church— ends from 2651 Union Existing fence is outside of property line. Heavy tree 374 LF Mobility, 3.1& north side Church Road to Venice clearing needed. $39,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Avenue(Siena Addition). Union Church— North side from Chesapeake 859 LF Mobility, 3.1& 7* Park sidewalk to Watermere Trees;utilities. north side $77,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 property. Union Church— North side from Watermere 416 LF Mobility, 3.1& 7* to Venice Avenue(Siena ROW/Easement issues. north side $62,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Addition). 58 Silicon Drive—east East side from 500 S.Nolen 460 LF Mobility, 3.1& side Drive to Exchange Boulevard. $42,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 West side from Exchange South Nolen Drive 439 LF Mobility, 3.1& 308 Boulevard north to connect Existing landscaping. —west side $40,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 to existing sidewalk. South White East side,from Big Bear 466 Chapel Boulevard— Creek bridge(Colleyville)to Existing landscaping;trees. Will provide a 2150 LF Mobility, 3.1& east side the offices at 1211 S.White connection to Colleyville's sidewalk network. $125,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Chapel Boulevard. 470 Davis Boulevard— East side missing gaps near Slope is a little steep in this location. South end ties 350 LF Mobility, east side Sunset Way. into a sidewalk with concrete slope. $19,000 Infrastructure,C2 Connect The Cliffs Park 482 Sunrise Ranch Road sidewalk to neighborhood Recommendation from the Parks,Recreation,and 140 LF Mobility, 3.1& sidewalk at 3611 Sunrise Open Space Master Plan. $8,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Ranch Road. Byron Nelson Gap along the west side of 100 LF Mobility, 3.1& 483* Parkway—west Byron Nelson Parkway,south Existing landscaping. $6,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 side of F.M.1709. Westbound frontage road Requires coordination with TXDOT and utility 486 S.H.114 Frontage gaps west and east of Kimball companies. Will need to rebuild ramps and relocate 2100 LF Mobility, 3.1& Road-westbound Avenue from 2000 E.S.H.114 traffic signal poles. $210,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 to 2540 E.S.H. 114. * Segment prioritized due to potential inclusion in a planned CIP project in the vicinity if funding and site conditions allow. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 32 [SOUTHLAKE 2035 Mobility Master Plan Q • co n 2035 4j DRAFT 3 Tier 1 Priority '• z Sidewalk Segments 1012212021 {"...• rf E.DOVERO �.......... ti...........fy, > 1,l a ? s............� • U r....................: 486 486 r Do 3 • m z 483 • •"�.. F.M.1709 . W Q E 58 308 :'•� 470 2 � x M.....: 5.�.�0..` W.CONTINENTAL BLVD 466 3••.. _jt_ ��..r•S.J • �"SFC CW. •vH.�% t•.•J • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 33 SOUTH LAKE 2035 Mobility Master Plan Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk ConstructionPriority Tier 2 and © Primary . _ WStrategic Link M North side from existing Union Church— Requires pedestrian bridge to be designed by 570 LF Mobility, 3.1& 7* sidewalk adjacent to Siena 2 north side Addition to Davis Boulevard. engineer. $278,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Crooked Lane— West side from Brookshire 420 LF Mobility, 3.1& 21* Drive to Southlake Sports Chain link fence may need to be moved back. 2 west side $39,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Complex. East side of Pearson Lane adjacent to 101 North 540 70* east side Pearson Lane— Pearson Lane;includes Ditch would conflict with beginning of sidewalk. $5151 LF 2 Mobility, 3.1& entrance to Chesapeake Place ,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 adjacent to Pearson Lane. 71* Chesapeake Lane Entrance to Chesapeake Place 50 LF 2 Mobility, 3.1& —south side adjacent to Pearson Lane $6,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Continental North side from Davis 76a* Boulevard—north Boulevard to existing 638 LF 2 Mobility, 3.1& side sidewalk adjacent to $58,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Woodbury subdivision. West side of Crooked Lane 86* Crooked Lane— adjacent to Southlake Sports 1171 LF 2 Mobility, 3.1& west side Complex to East Continental $77,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Boulevard. Existing road is split into two independent sections. 88 Parkwood Drive— From Byron Nelson Parkway Would need to relocate railing within the cul-de-sac 1575 LF 2 Mobility, 3.1& north/east side to F.M.1709. to make room for the sidewalk. $124,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 North side from Johnson Johnson Road— Requires sidewalk easement. Relocate fencing 548 LF Mobility, 3.1& 93 Place Estates to Randol Mill 2 north side behind proposed sidewalk. $56,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Avenue. North side of Turnberry Lane 98* Turnberry Lane— from Shady Oaks Drive to 660 LF 2 Mobility, 3.1& north existing sidewalk east of $39,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Suffolk Court. North side from Ridgecrest Oak Pointe Lane— 170 LF Mobility, 3.1& 101 north Drive to existing sidewalk on $12,000 2 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Oak Pointe Lane. 155* East Dove Street— South side from Winfield ROW,drainage,trees. 977 LF 2 Mobility, 3.1& south side Estates to Estes Park. $80,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 34 SOUTH LAKE 2035 Mobility Master Plan Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk ConstructionPriority Tier 2 and Primary Description Issues/Comments Strategic Link On the west side of North White Chapel Boulevard from North White the existing crosswalk south To be included with the bridge project on North 2443 LF Mobility, 3.1& 306 Chapel Boulevard of Wingate Lane to the 2 White Chapel Boulevard. $150,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 —west side existing sidewalk on The Cliffs Park property.8 ft minimum width. East side from the terminus Sidewalk location is near a retaining wall. There is a South Kimball 590 LF Mobility, 3.1& 474 at 165 S.Kimball Avenue to steep cross slope and may require additional 2 Avenue—east side F.M.1709. retaining wall. $46,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Westbound frontage road Requires coordination with TXDOT and utility 481 S.H.114 Frontage Road—westbound from North Carroll Avenue to companies. Will need to rebuild ramp and relocate $52 LF 2 Mobility, 3.1& 1110 E.S.H.114. traffic signal pole. 52,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 South Kimball From existing sidewalk east of 1151 LF Mobility, 3.1& 15 Avenue—north Silicon Drive to Cotton Belt Trees,signs,easement/ROW. $77,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 side Railroad. North Carroll From Southcrest Court to 2250 LF Mobility, 3.1& 28 Avenue—west ROW;grade;potential retaining wall needed. F.M.1709. $166,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 side Southridge Lakes From existing sidewalk north 32 Parkway—east of Southlake Boulevard to Trees;may require easements/HOA approval; 428 LF Mobility, 3.1& side Sabine Court segment not critical due to presence of slip streets Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Southridge Lakes From Sabine Court to Brazos Trees;may require easements/HOA approval; Mobility, 3.1& 33 Parkway—east Drive segment not critical due to presence of slip streets 647 LF Infrastructure,C2 3.3 side Southridge Lakes 34 Parkway—east East side from Brazos Drive to Trees;may require easements/HOA approval; 352 LF Mobility, 3.1& side Crockett Court segment not critical due to presence of slip streets $25,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Kirkwood East side from Tyler Street to 2295 LF Mobility, 3.1& 39 Boulevard—east side the private drive. $133,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Kirkwood From private drive to existing 1862 LF Mobility, 3.1& 41 Boulevard— sidewalk east of TW King Easement/ROW. $112,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 east/north side Road. 68 Pearson Lane— Adjacent to 3255 Jordan 536 LF © Mobility, 3.1& Infra east side Drive $36,000 structure,C2 3.3 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 35 SOUTH LAKE 2035 Mobility Master Plan Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk ConstructionPriority Tier 2 and © Primary . _ WStrategic Link M From Kirkwood Boulevard to T W King—east 2041 LF Mobility, 3.1& 79 side existing sidewalk adjacent to Grading. $143,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 The Cliffs subdivision 92 Johnson Road - From Trailhead Addition to Bar ditch,trees,drainage,ROW. Will require 624 LF © Mobility, 3.1& Infra north side Johnson Place Estates pedestrian bridge to be designed by an engineer. $294,000 structure,C2 3.3 Southridge Lakes From Brazos Drive to Crockett 1028 LF Mobility, 3.1& 115 Parkway—east side Court. $63,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 144, East Dove Street— From White Chapel Boulevard Would require multiple pedestrian bridges. 2007 LF © Mobility, 3.1& 154 south side to Estes Park. $693,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 West Highland North side from Shady Oaks 1880 LF Mobility, 3.1& 153* Drive to White Chapel Pedestrian bridge to be designed by engineer. Street—north side $459,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Boulevard 204* North Peytonville East side from Raven Bend ROW;Heavy tree removal. 4760 LF © Mobility, 3.1& Infra Avenue—east side Court to West Dove Road. $356,000 structure,C2 3.3 From existing sidewalk 205* Brumlow Avenue adjacent to Timarron to ROW,trees;also proposed sidewalk is within a ditch 2227 LF Mobility, 3.1& —west side existing sidewalk north of S.H. and fencing would need to be relocated. $176,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 26. 206* Shady Oaks—east East side from West Highland Heavy tree removal. 3150 LF © Mobility, 3.1& Infra side to Love Henry Court. $271,000 structure,C2 3.3 South Kimball South side from Continental 990 LF Mobility, 3.1& 303 Avenue—south Boulevard to railroad/city Easement/ROW. $61,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 side limit. 304 South Peytonville From Boardwalk to Elks Lane Would need to take down wall;heavy tree clearing 860 LF © Mobility, 3.1& Infra Avenue —connect gap to west side. needed. $80,000 structure,C2 3.3 North White East side from Southlake 948 LF Mobility, 3.1& 305 Chapel Boulevard Boulevard to Emerald To be built with widening. $62,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 —east side Boulevard. 399 East Dove Road— North side from S.H.114 to 1593 LF © Mobility, 3.1& Infra north side French Circle $159,000 structure,C2 3.3 East Continental North side from Byron Nelson 1680 LF Mobility, 3.1& 467 Boulevard—north Parkway to terminus near ROW;would require a bridge over the creek. $333,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 side Sarah Park Trail. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 36 SOUTH LAKE 2035 Mobility Master Plan Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk ConstructionPriority Tier 2 and © Primary . _ WStrategic Link M East Continental South side from sidewalk ROW;not much room for sidewalk with bar ditch, 3080 LF Mobility, 3.1& 468 Boulevard—south terminus(near Tealwood)to0 side Majestic Dance Academy. utility poles,and fences. $475,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 East side from West The north end of the segment will tie into existing 469 Davis Boulevard— Continental Boulevard to 855 sidewalk with a concrete slope. This area is steep 1010 LF Mobility, 3.1& east side Davis Boulevard. and may require engineering design for drainage $91,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 and grading. S.H.114 Frontage Eastbound frontage road Requires coordination with TXDOT and utility 4720 LF Mobility, 3.1& 471 between North Kimball companies. Will need to rebuild ramps and Road—eastbound Avenue and F.M.1709 relocate traffic signal poles. $338,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 East side from 405 South South Kimball Sidewalk location is near a retaining wall and there 370 LF Mobility, 3.1& 472 Kimball Avenue to 175 South Avenue—east side Kimball Avenue. is an inlet between the back of curb and the wall. $20,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 East side from Crooked Lane South Kimball Segment crosses rock rip rap near an open back 940 LF Mobility, 3.1& 473 to terminus at Christ Our King Avenue—east side curb inlet. $81,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Church. North Kimball West and east side from F.M. 1480 LF Mobility, 3.1& 475 Avenue—west 1709 to eastbound S.H. 114 Easement/ROW. $108,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 and east side Frontage Road. West side from 300 Shady Shady Oaks Drive Oaks Drive to Love Henry Requires engineering design due to drainage 1810 LF Mobility, 3.1& 476 Court and east side from —east and west Bicentennial Park terminus to Pattern. $165,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 Love Henry Court. Nolen Drive—east East side from the terminus 580 LF Mobility, 3.1& 477 side at 315 South Nolen Drive to $45,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 F.M.1709. 479 S.H.114 Frontage Westbound frontage road at 160 LF © Mobility, 3.1& A pedestrian bridge will be required. Road Infrastructure,C2 3.3 North Carroll West side from Primrose Lane 220 LF Mobility, 3.1& 480 Avenue—west .Easement/ROW side to Del Mar Drive. $19,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 North Carroll South of Winfield Court;2110 200 LF Mobility, 3.1& 487 Avenue—west Easement/ROW;fence relocation will be necessary. North Carroll Avenue. $24,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 side • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 37 SOUTHLAKE 2035 Mobility Master Plan Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk ConstructionPriority Tier 2 and © Primary . _ WStrategic Link M East Highland— North White Chapel will require relocation of utilities due to limited 1300 LF Mobility, 3.1& 490 Boulevard to 170'west of0 south side Imperial Avenue. ROW. $131,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 North White East side from Kirkwood X Chapel Boulevard Boulevard to Brentwood LF Mobility, 3$61 3. &3 —east side Circle. 61,000 Infrastructure,C2 3. North side from sidewalk East Dove Road— terminus west of Lonesome 4080 LF Mobility, 3.1& 491 north side Dove(1497 East Dove Road) ROW,drainage,trees,utility relocation. $360,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 to North Kimball Avenue. 0 South side from the Carroll 492 East Highland Middle School driveway to ROW,drainage,trees. $163 LF Mobility, 3.1& Street—south side 2149 East Highland Street. 163,000 Infrastructure,C2 3.3 *Segment identified for potential inclusion in a planned CIP project in the vicinity if funding and site conditions allow. Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Priority List) TXDOT Segments* Primary Description Issues/Comments Length& Strategic Link Street/Location Estimated Cost West Southlake South side at the 2500 block Requires engineering design due to drainage 141 Boulevard—south of West Southlake Boulevard pattern. The driveway for the church will need to be $63 LF 3.1& Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 side (The Hills Church of Christ). redone. 63,000 3.3 South side of East Southlake East Southlake Boulevard,west of Central 301 Boulevard—south Avenue;connecting existing Steep grade change. LF 3.1& Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 $10 3.3 side sidewalk to crosswalk at 10,000 Central Avenue. East Southlake South side from 2821 East 488 Boulevard—south Southlake Boulevard to 2905 290 LF Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3.1& side East Southlake Boulevard $23,000Grading;utilities. 3.3 (QuikTrip). • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 38 SOUTH LAKE 2035 Mobility Master Plan Master •athways Plan (Sidewalk • • Priority List) TXDOT Segments* Primary . Length Street/Location Estimated Cost East Southlake North side between 200 East Southlake Boulevard and 140 Grading;utilities 180 LF Mobility, 3.1& 489 Boulevard—north East Southlake Boulevard . $17,000 ,Infrastructure,C2 3.3 side (CVS Pharmacy). *To be completed by TXDOT as part of TXDOT's F.M. 1709 Pedestrian Improvements Project. Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk Construction Neighborhood Sidewalk Segments* Primary Description Issues/Comments Length& Strategic Link Street/Location Estimated Cost 0 Royal Lane—east East side of intersection of Steep grade. 41 LF Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3.1& side Johnson Road $5,000 3.3 Village Green Drive West side from Continental ROW/Easement;would need to take down an HOA 91 LF 3.1& 2 Boulevard to Amesbury Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 —west side entry wall. $14,000 3.3 Court. Deer Hollow West side from West 6 Boulevard—west Continental Boulevard north ROW/Easement. 96 LF Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3.1& side to parking lot on Southlake $8,000 3.3 Woods HOA lot. Morningside Drive West side from Merlot Drive 930 LF 3.1& 18 ROW/Easement. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 —west side to Rainbow Street. $111,000 3.3 Fontaine Drive/Lorraine From Merlot Drive to South 797 LF 3.1& 19 ROW/Easement. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 Drive/Versailles Carroll Avenue. $90,000 3.3 Drive North side from Byron 20 Nettleton Drive—north side 75 Nelson Parkway to Inwood HOA landscaping. $75 LF Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3 3. & ,000 3.3 Drive. Warwick Way— South side from Montgomery 150 LF 3.1& 22 ROW/Easement. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 south side Lane to Brumlow Avenue. $11,000 3.3 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 39 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk ConstructionPriority Neighborhood Sidewalk Primary • Length Street/Location Estimated Cost West side from existing Foxborough Lane— sidewalk along Gateshead 435 LF 3.1& 23 ROW/Easement. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 west side Court to East Southlake $27,000 3.3 Boulevard. Southcrest Court— North side from Southbend 385 LF 3.1& 26 ROW/Easement;retaining walls and large trees. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 north side Trail to North Carroll Avenue. $24,000 3.3 Southcrest Court— South side from Southbend 390 LF 3.1& 27 ROW/Easement;retaining walls and large trees. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 south side Trail to North Caroll Avenue. $28,000 3.3 North side from North White 56 Ascot Drive—north side 92 Chapel Boulevard to Saratoga $92 Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3.1& ,000 3.3 Drive. East Chapel Downs North side from North White 1651 LF 3.1& 57 Chapel Boulevard to end of ROW/Easement. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 Drive—north side $172,000 3.3 street. North side from South 61 Stonebury Court— Peytonville Avenue to Potential retaining wall. 175 LF Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3.1& north side existing sidewalk along Indian $22,000 3.3 Paintbrush Way. West side from existing Meadowlark Lane— sidewalk along Meadowlark 78 LF 3.1& 65 ROW/Easement. Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 west side Lane to West Southlake $13,000 3.3 Boulevard. 66 Jordan Drive and From North Pearson Lane to ROW/Easement. 1796 LF Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3.1& Harrell Drive Johnson Road. $135,000 3.3 67 Gray Lane From North Pearson Lane to ROW/Easement. 879 LF Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3.1& Harrell Drive. $74,000 3.3 Easement required. This is an existing nature trail Connector from Across Stone Lakes property within Stone Lakes HOA property. Accessibility Stone Lakes to from existing sidewalk along during construction would be difficult. Existing trail 533 LF 72 Monticello Stratford Drive to existing is narrow and would need to clear area for $287,000 3.1& Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 28 3.3 Estates/Timber trail on Monticello Estates construction. Trail would require stairs with Lake HOA property. pedestrian rail to reach Stratford Drive. Monticello is a gated community. From Royal&Annie Smith 74 Vermilion Court Park to West Southlake ROW/Easement. LF 3.1& Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 $106 3.3 Boulevard. 106,000 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 40 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Master Pathways Plan (Sidewalk ConstructionPriority Neighborhood Sidewalk Primary • Length Street/Location Estimated Cost From Gallant Court(Trailhead Easement required. Located within Trailhead HOA 131 Trailhead/Johnson Place connection Addition)to Johnson Place property. Within Flood Hazard Area Zone X;would $7, LF000 Mobility,Infrastructure,C2 3 3. & 3 Park. require culvert with headwall. *See Neighborhood Sidewalk Matching Funds Program. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 41 [SOUTHLAKE 2035] Mobility Master Plan Active Transportation and Crosswalk Policy Recommendations Recommendation Priority DepaStrategic Link rtment Tier Responsible AL IAA..hili+., I..f.a5+.6 1G+6 1.., Development sidewalk width shall he 5 feet COMPLETE ' Continue education outreach efforts Deyelep a ^dur-^*ie AT2 campaign to improve safety for motorists, pedestrians,and DPS, PDS, PW Safety&Security,Mobility;C1,C2 3.1,5.8 bicyclists. 0 Continue to conduct pedestrian safety walk-throughs in Town Square prior to any festival or Gensider,,bens nd o+ hlioh Safety&Security; Mobility; AT3 guidelines fee impreving pedestrian safety during festivals Ord PW, PDS, ED C1,C2 3.1 special events in Town Square. On an annual basis, review the sidewalk priority list and prioritize AT4 PDS, PW Mobility, Infrastructure;C2 3.1 sidewalk construction. I.,.ie ntery and...,eref.,.-. nce all hicyele signage it the city. Identify Mobility,Infrastructure, AT5 bicycle routes that may require additional signs. 2 PW, PDS Performance Management& 3.1 Service Delivery;C2,65,66 AT6 Explore options for encouraging bike rack installation at local 2 PDS ED Mobility,Partnerships& 9,1 9.3 businesses. Volunteerism;C2,C5,62 AT7 Conduct bicycle and pedestrian counts. Utilize Strava Metro for 2 PW, PDS Mobility;C2 3.1 tracking biking,walking, hiking,and running trips. Consider the addition of a grant writer/sidewalk coordinator position for grant writing,coordinating sidewalk and trail Mobility; Performance AT8 construction between departments and between public and private 2 TBD Management&Service 3.1,5.8 development projects, and managing bicycle/pedestrian Delivery;C1,C6 educational outreach. AT9 Consider elevated pedestrian crossings at all 4 corners of the PW, PDS Mobility;C1,C2 1.2, 3.1,3.2 intersection of Carroll Avenue and Southlake Boulevard. • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 42 [SOUTHLAKE 20351 Mobility Master Plan Recommendation Priority Department Strategic Link Tier Responsible Safety&Security, Mobility, inve tery all,.r rwgilks FrtAhr,;h Continue a regular maintenance Infrastructure, AT10 schedule for crosswalks,specifying more frequent maintenance of PW, PDS Performance Management 3.1 crosswalks near schools. &Service Delivery; C1,C2, B5, B6 Implement the recommended crosswalk types(Table P-1 in Safety&Security, Mobility, AT11 Mobility Master Plan pg._)whenever new crosswalks are installed PW 3.1 or existing crosswalks are re-striped. Infrastructure;C1,C2 Carrel' and 1709 and- Central threugh signage-And- the c—reatien ef a AT2 d*ser.urage Fnid h1eek eFessiRgs at State C+r.,.,+and Grand Aven Li. PDT S 1DC r-o -r-co PW, fvim This will be addressed by TXDOT as part of their FM 1709 Pedestrian Mobility Recommendations Mobility,Safety&Security, 1 r..,.,RtGFy aR d assess Famps R d pe d„stFiaR SigRals Develop a Performance Management AT13 . COMPLETE PW,CMO &Service Delivery;C1,C2,0 3.1 B5, B6 AT14 Continue participating in the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory PDS CS PW Partnerships& 9.1 Committee through the NCTCOG 0 Volunteerism;C5 As the City designs,constructs or provides maintenance on City roads consider opportunities to incorporate bicycle signage in a Quality Development, AT15 PW Mobility, Infrastructure; 1.2,3.7 manner that provides linkages to bicycle facilities in neighboring C2,C3 cities 0 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 43 'SOUTH LAKE 2035 Mobility Master Plan Mobility,Safety&Security, AT16 Consider citywide participation in Bike(Safety) Month (May) 0 PDS,CS, ED, DPS Partnerships& 3.7, 5.8,9.1 Volunteerism; C1,C3,C5, C6, Mobility,Safety&Security, AT17 Host a Bicycle Safety Forum PDS, PW, DIPS Partnerships& 3.7, 5.8,9.1 Volunteerism;C1,C5,C6, B2 Mobility, Partnerships& Upon Volunteerism, AT18 Ma s bike signa�e implementation, develop bicycle-related Story PDS, PW, ED Performance Management 3.7,9.3 p &Service Delivery; C2, B2, B6 Mobility,Safety&Security, AT19 Pursue grant funding opportunities for projects related to bicycle PDS, DPS, PW Performance Management 3.7,5.8 safety &Service Delivery; C1, B4, 0 F1 , s rr nnn m .nli+i ans and NCTr(1(_to dire-sc � C 9 � di Dc,rc, n, n Eoc V ItiS., , 33�, TpC Quali+., ,,9.1 hi.,".,I../nnslns.Rasues n n safety is and n ete r -.I nlnnnin..fs.r 61ReeF active tFanspeFtatie_A 0 &2 Once Brumlow Avenue is widened, promote the linkage from Mobility,Safety&Security, Performance Management AT21 Southlake to the Cotton Belt Trail. Include the linkage along Kimball PDS, PW &Service Delivery;C2,C3, 3.4 Avenue. B6 Consider designing, installing and/or constructing any future bike Quality Development, AT22 facilities according to AASHTO/NACTO guidelines PW Mobility, Infrastructure; 1.2,3.7, 10.6 0 C1, 61, F2 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 44 'SOUTH LAKE 20351 Mobility Master Plan Quality Development, AT23 Explore opportunities to implement new technology and PW PDS Mobility, Infrastructure, 1.2,3.2, 10.6 improvements that promote bicycle and pedestrian safety Safety&Security; C1,C2, 0 B6, F2 AT24 Research and consider pursuing Bicycle Friendly Community status PDS,CS Quality Development; B1 1.2 through the League of American Bicyclists 0 COMPLETE 0 CBS ^hQ' 1T ^" AT26 In coordination with local schools, update the City's Safe Routes to PDS Schools Plan. 0 • [SOUTHLAKE 2035] 45