Loading...
Item 8 - Presentation CITY OF -Iqq SOUTHLAKE Item 8 ZA21-0007 Zoning Change and Site Pla n Mustang Business Park ZA21-0007 OWNER: Wright Mustang Business Park., LLC APPLICANT: Kimley-Horn REQUEST: Approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan from ""I-1" Light Industrial District to ""S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District for three distribution warehouse buildings totaling approximately 31 : 1 square feet on • • • , 26.24 acres 40 EN CITY OF --glove, SOUTHLAKE" �r U Future Land Use Land Use Designation: 1800 SH 26 Industrial and 100-Year Floodplain rr♦ Future Land Use Update LU_TYPE - 100-Year Flood Plain .■ r � � Corps of Engineers Property =■ r Public Park/Open Space Public/Semi-Public Low Density Residential j Medium Density Residential fi Office Commercial ,WW.Demit� Retail Commercial y Mixed Use mr Town Center Regional Retail Industrial 345 690 ':iJ Feet ti I� J Zoning 1800 SH 26 1-1: Industrial District C12 AG - C1 RE � C2 SF1A - C3 SF1B - C4® SF - NR-PUD Q SF30 - HC SF20A 0 B1 0 SF20B 0 B2 R-PUD Q 11 r: Q MF1 - 12 i MF2 0 SP1 - MH 0 SP2 11 0 CS - DT / 0 01 TZD 0 02 0 ECZ 11 ri '.0 STA•IG_i r 11 12 PUD 1• ��f ~ �W���e7��� _O t'�. ';l _� '� �.i�i.��a r• ► ��. \l 6r�I�! '—Y i:i �J �,,��.lii`` . KaOh i n M a [ Win a ^+ It i IRS Im � f� a; ��,Ki'-... �" .:! q y .� •.A _ PPS s. �i- y�-��y-Si��i�� omrn��yp®�y� "�• .�� ;, t-SF �a •_ ¢� ��•• � .j{$O�$�A{yN' RNA a •t-'�ti 5���u,�iorla''i"" �:�•''l � '�••:.lii �'�!�e�'.`���i J11LLU CIS I- 2400 Mustang Ct Southlake,Texas ♦ Google Q. Street Mew �3 rr L (r• 1 Google Image capture:Feb 2020 ®2021 Google United States Terms Report a problem Street View TX-26 v — Grapevine,Texas !� u' 1 Google S. Street View f� ,f A' rw IL Goggle Image capture:Aug 2019 ®2021 Google United States Terms Report a problem Street View loan■►, t 1■ ■ ONO ��1,���r'tr •- ���:=.ids f�i ���.��� mill mill NONNI HE IS ;;jam: � p:■u���. : '■1 ��_.�I_. ion `+tx;-VJI ���V,1#11 Pathways Master Plan S= P= 1 Regulations Permitted Uses: The permitted uses are as allowed in the "I-1" Light Industrial District. Development Regulations: The development will comply with the "I-1" Light Industrial District with the following exceptions: Development Proposed "S-P-1" Requirement "I-1" Light Industrial District Regulation Any building lying more than one Any building lying more than one hundred hundred (100) feet from any area zoned (100) feet from any area zoned in a Building Height in a residential classification shall not residential classification shall not exceed exceed forty-five (40) feet in height. two and one-half (2 %) stories or thirty- five (35) feet in height. CITY OF In ,. s SOUTHLAKE Variance Request - • • - • • - • • - • - • • - • • 1 • • - • • • - • - - • - - • • - - - • - • • • - • • . 1 -lam A a a 0..... .M. M,ME mill ANIMMINK Mill ii • .:� r �Wi:lif�iiN1$�39ue� :u... �i�l,� • � ... Emergency only access driveway - ' GENERAL SITE DATA ` LOT AREA(SQUARE FEET AND ACRES) 1,142,803 SF/26.27AC �, EXISTINGZONING 11(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) FFFFFffTfrR-A FFFnTFFFFFIPROPOSEDZONING SP-1 EX LAND USE VACANT LAND USE DESIGNATION INDUSTRIALAND100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN PROP LAND USE SPECULATIVE DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE BUILDING HEIGHT(#STORIES) 39'TO 42'-6"/1 STORY MAX BUILDIN G HEIGHT ALLOWED PER SP-1 45FT BUILDINGAREA 340,1805E BUI LDI N G AREA BY USE: OFFICE(15%) 51,025SF WAREHOUSE(85%) 289,155 SF BUILDING COVERAGE AREA 29.800/0 �I IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 69.130% i I IMPERVIOUS AREA 790,057 SF IIi g PERCENTAGE OPENSPACE 30.87% f, AREA OPENSPACE 352,746SF II �, PARKING TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED* 460 SPACES { - y. TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED STANDARD 1O SPACES(9REQUIRED) I \ - HANDICAP 452SPACES I ril TOTAL 462SPACES 1 SPACE PER 1,000 SF OF WAREHOUSE 1 SPACE PER 300 SF OF OFFICE REQUIRED LOADING SPACES 17 SPACES(6,500 SF) on PROVIDED LOADING SPACES REFERENCE PLAN FOR LOADING ZONES AREA OF OUTSIDE STORAGE OSF o" PERCENTAGE OF OUTSIDE STORAGE 01A / \ ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION START DATE: Jun-21 CONSTRUCTION END DATE: Jan-23 — - Variances requested to allow a 0' stacking depth and no sidewalk P&Z Commission Issues and Concerns discussed at the February 25, 2021 meeting P&Z Commission Issues and Concerns Applicant's Response Reduce the building heights. Higher interior clearance affects the user The maximum building height has been reduced from 45' to 40' and type and velocity. building heights now range from 39' to 39'9". The row of parking facing the "MH" zoned properties on Woodsey Ct. and Timberline Ct. has been removed. The required parking has been Eliminate the parking along the north driveway. reduced by reducing the percentage of office space allowed from 15% to 6%of the floor area. Provide as much landscaping as possible along the north property Additional landscaping along the north property line is shown on the line. plans. Consider relocating the south driveway closer to Building 3 to The driveway to the south has been relocated to the west as increase stacking depth from the intersection of Mustang Ct. and Southwestern St. to that turning movement. requested. Provide an opaque gate at the emergency access at the end of A photo example and rendering of the proposed opaque gate have Woodsey Ct. been submitted. Consider access to Brumlow Ave. A 60' wide private access easement to the west property line has been provided to allow a possible future connection. Provide a TIA that addresses the Lee Engineering review comments. A revised TIA and Lee Engineering review are attached separately. Provide a sidewalk along Southwestern St. The required 5' sidewalk along Southwestern St. has been added and the previous variance request has been removed. ITY OF I -- ; , - - T.FSOUTHLAKE �. Row of parking removed IF _ 3 v Height 42'6" �- a- Height 39' Height 39 3 ®� I Height 40' II _ I , o Access easement provided .. i r " - - --t a i 1 , ..� .e —a -- �n _. x �. ... ... - .. .. as ._ ..,, .,. .. s .. a Height 39' 1.,�\ \ Height 39'9" p Driveway relocated %� / 5'sidewalk provided ► February 25, 2021 , _ \ - April 8, 2021 Emergency only access driveway Y w" GENERAL SITE DATA LOT AREA(SQUARE FEET AND ACRES) 1,142,803 SF/26.27 AC —————— — IXISTINGZONING Il(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) RIM1 0 4 PROPOSEDZONING SP-1 1—" V - Pr • . EXLAND USE VACANT LAND USE DESIGNATION INDUSTRIAL AND 300-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN PROP LAND USE SPECULATIVE DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE \ • .•., BUILDING HEIGHT(#STORIES) 39'TO 39'-9"/1 STORY 1 MAX BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED PER SP-1 40 FT BUILDINGAREA 340,180SF I i BUILDING AREA BY USE: OFFICE(6%) 20,410SF WAREHOUSE(94%) 319,770SF BUILDING COVERAGE AREA 29.80% g IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 65.80% I _ IMPERVIOUS AREA 752,059SF PERCENTAGE OPENSPACE 34.20% AREA OPENSPACE 390,745 SF .I f C7 € } PARKING 111111 a Y111111 TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED' 388 SPACES 1� TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED "� _-1 ,,, •� °` " _ -" STANDARD 382SPACES .o �„ HANDICAP 10 SPACES(9 REQUIRED) i \ '-- _ _-- --- =r TOTAL 392 SPACES �� � \ r �t. � -�'' •1 SPACE PER 1,000 SF OF WAREHOUSE 91 \� .yegg •1 SPACE PER 300 SF OF OFFICE w.�.,,... REQUIRED LOADING SPACES 17 SPACES(6,500 SF) PROVIDED LOADING SPACES REFERENCE PLAN FOR LOADING ZONES / \� AREA OF OUTSIDE STORAGE OSF PERCENTAGE OF OUTSIDE STORAGE 0% ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT ,,, ...\�i .'�� / e /�� �' •�x CONSTRUCTION START DATE: Jun-21 CONSTRUCTION END DATE- Jan-23 �� Variance requested to allow a 0 stacking depth / BUILDINGMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING-2: 40'-0" 1 1 1 1 1 � I I I I i �t7lt# WINTERWHITE NORTH ELEVATION P-2 FOGGY GREY MORTAR GREY w:JR P-5(ACCENT) ELEVATIONEAST a2 . 5 STOREFRONT GLAZING =ice= II 1h071 HE V I ImQ C II?jHImim CONCRETEw■� , WEST ELEVATION PANELW/TEXTURED FINISH METAL PANEL METAL SIDING NICHIHA ACM SPRUCE ... , SOUTH • 1 Previous Elevations Building 1 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING _ 1 BUILDING-1: 39'-3" yM ,�,,,, ,,.,.., PAINT COLOR SCHEME: .-r" BUILDING-2: 39'-0" BUILDING -3: 39'-9" ®® a ®® ❑ P-1 WINTER WHITE NORTH ELEVATION P-2 FOGGY GREY .z.o. �_,� n... �,. ,..� ■ P-3 MORTAR GREY e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e ❑ -o ❑ o P-4 ACCENT ®®®®® ®®®®®® ala®®®® ®PIP ■ ARCHITECTURAL GRAY EAST ELEVATION ■ KO(ACCENT) _2 KO(ACCENT) BLUE MATERIALS: _ _ �� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 1 ALUMINUM/ / ■ STOREFRONT ®®®® ®®®®®® ®®®PIP® ®®®®® GLAZING WEST ELEVATION CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL W/TEXTURED / i FINISH -...- .�.,.. .�... .... �...., ■ METAL PANEL ® METAL SIDING / NICHIHA ACM SOUTH ELEVATIONN /� ■ SPRUCE WOOD �_ C- ' April 82021 PANEL MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: PAINT COLOR SCHEME: MATERIALS: BUILDING-1: 42'-6" BUILDING-2: 40'-0" „T --- _=__ ❑ P-1 ■ ALUMINUM/ WINTER WHITE STOREFRONT BUILDING -3: 39'-0" (� =,i GLAZING 2 'J�1 ❑ FOGGY GREY CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL W/TEX URED - -_� FINISH ■ MORTAR GREY ■ METAL PANEL MO ■ P-4 ACCENT ® METAL SIDING - - ARCHITECTURAL GR, ■ P-5(ACCENT) ■ NICHIHA ACM KOLIBRI BLUE SPRUCE WOOD PANEL BUILDING - 2 ®®®® ■■■■ NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION " " r — ■ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N 0 0 0 0 o N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,�, EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION n ~ ,� �, a ► i ' f February 25, 2021 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING-1: 39'-3" PAINT COLOR SCHEME: MATERIALS: BUILDING-2: 39'-0" -------- r----- P-1 r` ■ ALUMINUM/ BUILDING -3: 39'-9'• WINTER WHITE STOREFRONT GLAZING . .a 2 �- P-2 El CONCRETE TILT-UP FOGGY GREY PANEL W/TEXTURED FINISH l ■ P-3 ■ METAL PANEL � - MORTAR GREY 3 � I ACCENT ® METAL SIDING AR ARCHITECTURAL GR ■ P-5(ACCENT) ■ NICHIHA ACM KOLIBRI BLUE SPRUCE WOOD PANEL BUILDING - 2 NORTH ELEVATION - WEST ELEVATION ❑ ❑ ❑ o 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 11011110 a m� m� E2UULJL� L�L�L�Lj LJLJI N I �*�I n EAST ELEVATION nVu SOUTH ELEVATION April 8, 2021 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: PAINT COLOR SCHEME: MATERIALS: BUILDING-1: 42'-6" BUILDING-2: 40'-0" _ ❑ P-1 ■ ALUMINUM/ Ilili (I� WINTER WHITE STOREFRONT BUILDING -3: 39'-0" GLAZING 2 ❑ P-2 CONCRETE TILT-UP FOGGY GREY El PANEL W/TEXTURED ---- FINISH MORTAR GREY ■ METAL PANEL P-4 ACCENT ■ METAL SIDING ARCHITECTURAL GR ® ■ P-5(ACCENT) ■ NICHIHA ACM KOLIBRI BLUE SPRUCE WOOD PANEL BUILDING -3 -. ., -wr rev 711777 NORTH ELEVATION .. WEST ELEVATION 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ❑ ■ in ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ❑ ❑ EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION February 25, 2021 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING-1: 39'-3" PAINT COLOR SCHEME: MATERIALS: BUILDING-2: 39'-0" : P-1 ALUMINUM/ WINTER WHITE BUILDING -3: 39'-9'• °' -�` "-". ❑ ■ STOREFRONT GLAZING P-2 El CONCRETE TILT-UP 2 -o ❑ FOGGY GREY PANELW/TEXTURED FINISH I "'^`"" ■ P-3 ■ METAL PANEL MORTAR GREY 3 " ■ P 4 ACCENT ® METAL SIDING ARCHITECTURAL GR. �f� ■ P-5(ACCENT) ■ NICHIHA ACM KOLIBRI BLUE SPRUCE WOOD PANEL BUILDING -3 _,A-" ®®®® 3 NORTH ELEVATION w WEST ELEVATION Pf - — .�� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ e e e e e a ❑ e e a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ e o ❑ o 0 0 ❑ o ❑ EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION April 8, 2021 • C\� View at Entrance • February1 21 ■■i j 11 Olnr 11 IIO 1 111■1 1 1 IIIII�!1 11 1 �11 1111 111 111 1111 11111.f111 ■lW11111 1111 EL y; POINT A-LOOKING SOUTH POINT B-LOOKING SOUTH a Previous line of Sight Exhibits April 8, 2021 -PROPOSED EMERGENCY ACCESS GATE % nm m n a� um m mmuu m um R Eanm m- ft LOOKING -.0000010 POINT .. POINT _ LOOKING SOUTH Revised line of Sight Exhibits 1235 Woodsey Ct Q Southlake,Texas S• jGoogle Street View it. 1•' y..r by •'* ``.i_ )�+err t —`,� •.. I,a,'. .;��— �11 %• {`�.� :�� _ •,.�. 3� � > _ _.y'".. - _- - - art Google Image capture:Oct 2018 02021 Google United States Terms Report a problem Street View t 1235 Timberline Ct v Southlake,Texas S ~ Google _ ^ x 4. Street View i $ . 1 1. —�`f�� � - Ems. -' ._ • - . -...���`;��-''� � + Image capture:Oct 2018 2021 Gooyle United States Terms Report a pYoblem Street View Tree Canopy Cover Summary Total Site Area 1,142,780(sf) 1�_ ,� + Total Existing Canopy Coverage(sf) 253,758.5 22.3%of site of Required Preservation 38,063.8 15 Cano sting of Current Preserved(SO 55,020.5 21 6CanoExisting py ,, _ Tree Inches Being Removed ` Total Tree Inches Removed 8,857.7 Ir \ \ Total Tree Canopy SF Removedl 198,738.0 Total Tree Canopy Percent Removed 78.4%of Existing .< "!�►, r Canopy °gbh nv R quired canopy to be preserved — 60% JA P oposed canopy to be preserved — 21.6% ALI EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO BE PROTECTED XXXX EI)STING TREE TO BE T y -9 ip. '_ .^ s s . ' ,^ REMOVED H k EXISTING DECUNINGAiAZARD 0 TREE TO BE REMOVED - _ �► T.;{ EXISTING TREE TO BE µ _ PROTECTED GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET r _ 0 25 50 100 h 1 +• a _ _. -_ -s,_ ,..+ ;. �' TREE PROTECTION FENCING, - - -- - - 1 r._ -- REF.DETAIL A,THIS SHEET Tree Canopy Cover Summary — — — �;� j Total Site Area 1,142,780(sf) --- - ,- •• • Total Existing Canopy Coverage(sf) 253,758.5 22.3%of site •- • �^, ' ( 15%of Existing i ,`� • 3 Required Preservation 38,063.8 Canopy �I P 27.6%of Existing all°° • ° • ._ l y Current Preserved(sf) 70,125.1 Canopy -ji Tree Inches Being Removed I; ® Total Tree Inches Removed 8,380.1 •_ Total Tree Canopy SF Removed 183,633.4 •- w • 4%of Existing Total Tree Canopy Percent Removed 72. Canopy • ;' '.� ; ;.,. Required canopy to be preserved — 60% • •.ram_• A- 4- -•. �+! ••�, •• ' \ o •` !Merllit .►= 8IV \ Proposed canopy to be preserved — 27.6/O . ` S. _ •�•• •- #,� �@ •- v� \ LEA;=r,=. •- • �,. _ _ - ,•.a,"pd ..aa�p• ��:e®'y,.® aIlk \� Ie EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO t.-. any 0:�, °�y ,,. •. 1 I I •�- •-'i1�_+ �� •-+i��a_ � •p�iT J BE REMOVED y-VA*. w _ =s _ '- w• •.. •pQrit4 • •; I' EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO ,/ .s- �- • �- -y,_ ,.. e� • $� h BE PROTECTED If F • • e bT 9 e e .\t" xnac EXISTING TREE TO BE •• • • +! '�3.. a�� �a a. JA REMOVED = Ok �I f ,ems' • :� •�' •f , �' u-tlo ' ® '-: xxxx EXISTING DECUNINGMAZARD z TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE PROTECTED GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET - _ r TREE PROTECTION FENCING, 1 -- '---- . .._. -=:------ -"---- -- _ -{ REF.DETAIL A,THIS SHEET -r:- i"r '� -_-- Revised Tree Conservation Plan �s�sLar�O*a��•-�►.�w_._.r,•.w.-,.mac.-s..5 � �,iR `, oa .. � as•B; .or. I�a� Y ao n M �gPROPOSED BUILDI RIF, 1 1 a>, a;rzmmoiwa PROPOSED BUILDING - � a �0� ►. ^.typ�a� s. �®mono® PROPOSED BUILDING REF.ARCHITECTURE ®moonu-:aa i 1 �pCi' oo k (�4......... .......�.�" � a.00aa0000 FEMININE Previous Overall landscape Plan �., I I J/ .�� Fir—••--iii�...r�c�a0 o eA nmuo a . o - - � ew �a8PRO DBUILDINGb' - ReeREF.ARCHITECTURE Ooo a_ a• a� � r '�_��®1'�®� PROPOSED BUILDING REF.ARCHITECTURE Its e9Ir �:' ., •s � 3 a tir% 111'''♦'♦♦♦LAhDSCAPE MUSTANG BUSINESS PARK ...♦♦♦. �•c Oe aa• Revised Overall landscape Plan a ` a�pfj as nao � �y O 11111110 O aaaP ota mie� o44ks MM0 � Y a mnno on: _ *• �r �q - PROPOSED BUILDINGREF.ARCHITECTURE PROPOSED BUILDING REF.ARCHITECTURE gym® a a. > o 1.03 k n �� ❑ 'd a ^� �• ®® LP 1.05 PROPOSED BUILDING REF.ARCHITECTURE a pppp W ' 6 4 . '�a � _ ��i as ���.,� '.i ��� • !b ooaaTar{Q,a,�saotoosa aae'au �,�o TT o00 oa as �8�0�0t_ �,�i'�?��,,�otoZ"Cga4,. a®aaaao�000aoa�ooccoaoo�"oaao"uoo"oo • , �� I O`O`O�O . Previous Overall landscape Plan �� I'lllll� � Q 61• PRO SED BUILDING REF.ARCHTECTURE coo G co u'' 0�00000 OI i00• �a\ a ®®oo®mm - ARCHITECTURE EF °4 A 0' b �- 0. r .s�' O C e• -,�� t O ix Revised Overall landscape Plan s . •• III ������®��'���.�; . � �.�. .�i !��`".`_d���A���$ + . i , ti nnme ., Ili - ��������� �►�@*��� h. 7 o SWUN Me a PROPOSED BUILDING • O�i / Previous Landscape Plan LP1 .01 p;a ��b ��'����#� � � � �� ���°��D63��W'+��tiy�.�,•� �•a� PROPOSED BUILDING , REF.ARCMITECTURE o Revised Landscape Plan LP1.01 _—— / s LP 1.01 -- � p�rippppr�p� �p �LP1 02®1 `_\ ❑ \ \� /� 1P2G� J9 LP L03 LP 1.04 w�w<TL w 71 i® LP1.06� \f \--LP107 ID z 1 xr. 2T 0 j.......,,,.�........«.d. � o m North g o IiI-Xa / 0 El 1 \� 5 LANDSCAPE PLAN LU LU / I MGSTANG BUSINESS PARR Q 1 ``\ = gaeMnfa pelow. Befog 28.29 Aorea Out Ot TM U 11 Cp��oM°^1'°a ap. Dxkar Fla Moon Survey, y _` Abalrect e.9B T. IB9 zoaaa.D ZZ -- i MATCH LINE SHEET lP 1.09 - .``� City of Boathieka,Temeo!Couoly.Texea J February 25, 2021 LP 1.01 O A 1 000 is O ■ �A��yt(,!�'� IIIIIII� a ° �t,c�■o►me;e; ti. o r O ' 1 Revised Landscape Plan LP1.02 ------------------------------------------------------------ ----y— MATCH LINE SHEET LP 1 01 UP 1.01 � .^ 1 ❑ Id q — 1� 0 : 1 LP 1.03 ; m LP 1.04 ■CO YJ*JlLWLA *J PROPOSED BUILDING 1 . - - —' REF ARCHITECTURE — LP106 ? ..•. e LP 1.06 Y _ LP 07 i i Iz 's 11 1 0 1 w o0 i 111 North 1 1 - - -----=--=-==-=--= - MATCH LINE SHEET LP 1.05 Z �,{ " "—".'°'""".e OO " r�.,w..••.. n�s...w.m.wo,.am..« LANDSCAPE PLAN W O ° "•'°"'°"'®'"' O ",.,,..,,.....•,,,,.,,,,,, 0 . w..•...•.,•.•.... MUSTANG BUSINESS PARK Q 0. ❑ Wp..Ifa6NOW. Belve 28.21 Acrea Out OI The U —...a. ..ws•.w O •"®..uw•..w.r.w.w" o Cell MIwYW 4Y. Becker.Aerrison Cwvey, a m 4WWY O ® g Abaer.et ase,rre t tB9 p o zonaaRen February 25, 2021 �., ,.� BStya,son�ak..T. tBann � sa S.b—tt.a February 01.2021 m�.um o°o°o � �„� '� o • 1�1111�� � � �` ��'• � IIIIIII� 9: ,o ►�� A v • e oA .►.;_< � � rye,=�,I� ���@�� = • ��- - p e�}�z7; Revised Landscape Plan LP1.03 MATCH UNE ET P1.02 — t — �Leit'� '�iL+�'S+l�.e/ HE11 .�'>- --- --------- -------� a. ❑ a € LP 1.03 LP 1.04 Y Is 1 1 €'4 LP 1.05 I_I .a LP 1.06 t n .. .�.ri. 1 -.,., i PROPOSED BUILDING \ ��� LP 1 07 REF.ARCHITECTURE o E e 1 a II m _ z e m �r North a 1 1 1 Z a ouMscnEffiW m u �...,,...®..a....:.,m.,.:..�TCH UN��SHE�LPLP 1Yfi a / . ....w��....«�. W �.........x,m.F,�,. a O O � a MUSTANG BUSINESS PARK Q tI 1 w..all 6elaM. eelna fe.zT anree oat o .,,......�.�...d, � �..,..,.�,..« � � Call aanyou au. lleaker rrerri.oa sw.ey y lJ � � � �et 1� o o ® z, Clty of SoutNeke.Tersent County,Texea / 0 . ..:murvu.e... Submitted February al.Pa2� February 25, 2021 mingling 00 �, ho i p o n ' Revised Landscape Plan LP1.04 -- off_ LP 1.01 *_ ❑ _ O • •�• •MATCH NNE SHEET LP 1.M — eJ._• •1 s, 1 G LP 1.03 i LP 1.04 — 8 s O a _ I — LP106 a 1_LP 1.06 I. -LP _ jE PROPOSED BUILDING 1 g .ice w� REF.ARCHITECTURE E gg p 1 1 j w — z 1 — 1 w 1 LLo North rr r MATCHUNESHEET LP1.07 N /J O - -+�+•���^—+� © LANDSCAPE PLAN W Q. u �...J•M.�..O..M.^. O ..�..���..o. O go����..a � MUSTANG 91'8I1'ESS PARK Q / Ih,e,Ntehe 0�. Befog fg. Aorca out Of The I1 DBII IMonpuly. Decker,(GrrLon Survey, N O © 5 ame,nef�se.u.of fBa ❑ February 25, 2021 z a t S tN k Te t C fy T 0 em tt a e hrgery a zozl 0 � at M -1 LP 1.05 o �a + LP 1.03 --------------- -------------------------- -------------- - � 0 0 o � � e s •y41 - _"""."'v ,. .accR�masacaam�rsxaaaesa�-�-..,.. - .._ -_. __._____ -. 4 i@r91 ■� �v ----------- ------------- MINE .119 0 0 - Revised Landscape Plan LP1.05 Im 104 .__ — __ • 7—�. — — -----------------/4—G—L— --- -——————————————————————-— r a 1.02 -------------------- = I `- PROPOSED BULDING ` -�.— + .rr�.»T ® REF.ARCHITECTURE � LP103„ LP 1 04Ul \ F � § LP 1.06 12 LP 1.06 .oQooQo aQ4 as a : ; j ;s °e!� Wso m C North ===-==_=-=--==--_ I ALL> C II�m.weu a. H.mwa swwy N Z ...».—. «._. u • _.«- cap w s.ua.s.r. m y>�. g / February 25, 2021 � e--- �-- i � �m 0 � _._.. ...e r y„ xba r�amY �i T ;n vnr�q�a°'�• LP 1.06 9 19 II ,'. �-I;�p ,phi �/�•,r .► a F s.aLP 1.03 1 - 141 �' _•��, . ' ;4E¢�"�r �� e�s "•�:�«Yj' s��r �p�Y®Z"iDZ'4Y4TpT�l�.�.t� r� r cd ° °°e O d A p,O CI` O a o ° ° Revised Landscape Plan LP1.06 FO•I LP 1.01 \ o a •\ '� LP 2 -- ALP 1.03 ®i LP 1.04 �\ WTCFUNES°EET LP1.05 r+ ____-_----__--__----------------- r____~�__� ______--»______� �ry o0 VVEff @g� FF , -- -M� q- 122 rt ' i4=�.4,- -- — -- -- - - ---fir---- - - ---------- ---- -- -- — - - ---------- - ---- --_---- - - _--_-- - ----—-- -L LP 1.06 `- - - ----,.Fi--� ----- -- ------------- North Z g I a fAF0.:CAPE PfAh W Yi.!?i: Q Z. sb zJ Arras Oot Ot 1Ds V I `/ Cd�Mtm1W 4Y. DxM.H nleoa 5tmwy. y AMnet r30,Me[169 O ., .--._....._ nnnV,.vv: February 25, 2021 �~� L 1-07 uu©m >! i •, g•° o °� °� �� �'Y�'o as e` cis � Q6 0�'>: e��:�.F���i,�8� a • ��® e v ' � o � e �o e a ��A��� .n� _ 1 ,• oe o o � e e o .:,,���=� •• �. .' �� q�y � 2 �� �t a .� o �� 6 O O �r A D•� a?S O O O e 11 eo - a�g O I+dl'�I /I FIt \E'7 o Revised Landscape Plan LP1 .07 III�■ � ��� ���■: �IIIII■ � mow■ ��_�II�� ,s Surrounding Property Owner Responses P&Z Commission FORM A' /\ IIIIIII� G'W _��11 111111 11111��� 11111 111111 111� �Illl 11111 ■ 1 . ' ' KIN A --- 4 - Preliminary Utility Plan 811 �o �o �o Wi�lll� r% I S=2111 via. - ♦♦♦. r� MA•�������� Preliminary Grading Plan ( North ) o �o 8,1 o i� rrrrrrr© 1 am �111�d■.. _J ♦1����������/ Preliminary Grading Plan (South) CITY OF a o � MN imi mmm..mm Building 3 Masonry Exhibit