Loading...
Item 8 - Presentation CITY OF -Iqq SOUTHLAKE Item 8 ZA21-0039 Site Plan Mustang Business Pare ZA21-0007 Future Land Use Land Use Designation: 1800 SH 26 Industrial and 100-Year Floodplain rr♦ Future Land Use Update LU_TYPE - 100-Year Flood Plain .■ r � � Corps of Engineers Property =■ r Public Park/Open Space Public/Semi-Public Low Density Residential j Medium Density Residential fi Office Commercial ,WW.Demit� Retail Commercial y Mixed Use mr Town Center Regional Retail Industrial 345 690 ':iJ Feet ti I� J Zoning 1800 SH 26 1-1: Industrial District C12 AG - C1 RE � C2 SF1A - C3 SF1B - C4® SF - NR-PUD Q SF30 - HC SF20A 0 B1 0 SF20B 0 B2 R-PUD Q 11 r: Q MF1 - 12 i MF2 0 SP1 - MH 0 SP2 11 0 CS - DT / 0 01 TZD 0 02 0 ECZ 11 ri '.0 STA•IG_i r 11 12 PUD 1• ��f ~ �W���e7��� _O t'�. ';l _� '� �.i�i.��a r• ► ��. \l 6r�I�! '—Y i:i �J �,,��.lii`` . KaOh i n M a [ Win a ^+ It i IRS Im � f� a; ��,Ki'-... �" .:! q y .� •.A _ PPS s. �i- y�-��y-Si��i�� omrn��yp®�y� "�• .�� ;, t-SF �a •_ ¢� ��•• � .j{$O�$�A{yN' RNA a •t-'�ti 5���u,�iorla''i"" �:�•''l � '�••:.lii �'�!�e�'.`���i J11LLU CIS I- 2400 Mustang Ct Southlake,Texas ♦ Google Q. Street Mew �3 rr L (r• 1 Google Image capture:Feb 2020 ®2021 Google United States Terms Report a problem Street View TX-26 v — Grapevine,Texas !� u' 1 Google S. Street View f� ,f A' rw IL Goggle Image capture:Aug 2019 ®2021 Google United States Terms Report a problem Street View A Height 39'3" Height 39' Height 35' Height 35' k 5' �¢. l g g g L ! a_ -» �- r — FIN III _� 517 III Driveway relocated to meet Height 39'9" w�\` \ .,� stacking depth-min. 150' Height 35' required and 190'shown Building heights reduced to 35' � , It to comply with "I-1" District� � y 5 sidewalk provided �� � ° - May 20, 2021 Access easement provided : April 8, 2021 - ZA21-0007 �- �` � _ Z- ZA21-0039 .... Emergency . g Y Y 3 Y GENERALSITEDATA - Emer enc only access driveway 1 �-a "'"'" T — — s LOT AREA(SQUARE FEET AND ACRES) 1,143,014 SF/26.24 AC III \ s EXISTINGZONING 11(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) r m �,. PROPOSEDZONING 11(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) EX LAND USE VACANT LAND USE DESIGNATION INDUSTRIAL AND 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN PROP LAND USE SPECULATIVE DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE BUILDING HEIGHT(#STORIES) 35'-00"/1 STORY MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 35FT BUILDINGAREA 340,180SF BUILDING AREA BY USE: II i OFFICE(7%) 23,815 SF WAREHOUSE(93%) 316,315SF BUILDING COVERAGE AREA 29.80% - IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 70.94% I' I IMPERVIOUSAREA 810,701SF LEI PERCENTAGE OPENSPACE 29.06% a'.1 AREA OPENSPACE 332,1025E 11111601 Mt I III ,o I' I i ., �, PARKING ---r- -* v TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED' 3965PACE5 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED k AL STANDARD 388SPACES � _ HANDICAP 1O SPACES(9REQUIRED) \J� TOTAL 398SPACES 15PACE PER 1,0005E OF WAREHOUSE 1SPACE PER 300SF OF OFFICE REQUIRED LOADING SPACES BUILDING 1:9;BUILDING 2:6;BUILDING 3:6 ilq / PROVIDED LOADING SPACES(10'X60') BUILDING 1:38;BUILDING 2:19;BUILDING 3:24 AREA OF OUTSIDE STORAGE OSF PERCENTAGE OF OUTSIDE STORAGE 0% 9 .anao ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION START DATE: Jan-22 Emergency only access driveway \' �i CONSTRUCTION END DATE: Jun-23 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING " 1 BUILDING-1: 39'-3" iik ".� o�yM __ ,,.,.., ^�^v PAINT COLOR SCHEMEBUILDING-2: 39'-0"BUILDING -3: 39-0" r ®® ❑ WI WINTER WHITE NORTH ELEVATION P-2 FOGGY GREY .z.o. �_,� n... �,. ,.... ■ P-3 MORTAR GREY e-e e e e e e e e e e e e min e e e e e e-e e e -- P-4 ACCENT ■ LIN21 - �� � � - -� ARCHITECTURALGRAY EAST ELEVATION ■ KO(ACCENT) -2 1 _ KO(ACCENT) BLUE '° �LL 5 MATERIALS. - -- � �� � ❑ ❑ ❑ � � � ❑ ❑ '❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � � ALUMINUM/ i 3 - - ■ STOREFRONT 3 ®®® ®®®PIP® RN F® GLAZING -- WEST ELEVATION CONCRETE TILT-UP / PANEL W/TEXTURED FINISH ..- .�.,.. -.- ._... - ,-_r. �...., ,m ■ METAL PANEL ® METAL SIDING / SOUTH ELEVATION » S RUICE HA WOOD 'N, April 8, 2021 - ZA21-0007 j PANEL MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING - ,I BUILDING -1: 35'-0" o — PAINT COLOR SCHEME: BUILDING -2: 35'-0" .. H .. P 1 _ WINTER WHITE BUILDING -3: 35'-0" NORTH ELEVATION P-2 FOGGY GREY MORTAR GREY ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a n n n ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ m 3F=1 P-4 ACCENT ■ ARCHITECTURAL GRAY EAST ELEVATION u ■ KO IBRI BLUE 1 2 L` MATERIALS: 4 ¢ ■ ALUMINUM/ ILISTOREFRONT -- GLAZING WEST ELEVATION CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL W/TEXTURED FINISH n.,.., ., ",...., ... .o." ■ METAL PANEL ® METAL SIDING / NICHIHA ACM SOUTH ELEVATION SPRUCE WOOD May 20, 2021 SCHEME PANEL MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING-1: 39'-3" PAINT COLOR SCHEME: MATERIALS: �. BUILDING-2: 39'-0" P-q ALUMINUM/ BUILDING -3: 39'-0" WINTER WHITE STOREFRONT -- GLAZING 1- P-2 El CONCRETE TILT-UP ' ❑ FOGGY GREY PANEL W/TEXTURED FINISH 7, - ■ ■ METAL PANEL MO MORTAR GREY 3 E / ■ ACCENT METAL SIDING AR I( -- -- ARCHITECTURAL GR 'r ■ P-5(ACCENT) ■ NICHIHA ACM KOLIBRI BLUE SPRUCE WOOD PANEL BUILDING - 2 mrmlill NORTH ELEVATION - WEST ELEVATION E" o ❑ 0000000 ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ - EAST ELEVATION nVv April 8, 2021 - ZA21-0007 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: PAINT COLOR SCHEME: MATERIALS: BUILDING 1: 35'-0" l i P-1 ALUMINUM/ E _ _ 'i ❑ WINTER WHITE ■ STOREFRONT BUILDING -2: 35'-0" GLAZING P2 1- - =-- �. CONCRETE TILT-UP _ - FOGGY GREY El PANEL W/TEXTURED BUILDING - 3: 35'-0" - FINISH ■ P-3 ■ METAL PANEL MORTAR GREY ■ P-4 ACCENT METAL SIDING ARCHITECTURAL GR ■ P-5(ACCENT) ■ NICHIHA ACM KOLIBRI BLUE SPRUCE WOOD BUILDING -2 PANEL NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION X V\ \ \ \_ May 20, 2021 Elevations Building MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING-1: 39'-3" PAINT COLOR SCHEME: MATERIALS: �. BUILDING-2: 39'-0" WI ALUMINUM/ BUILDING -3: 39'-0" - - ❑ WINTER WHITE ■ STOREFRONT GLAZING P-2 CONCRETE TILT-UP _ 2 1 0 ❑ FOGGY GREY El PANEL W/TEXTURED FINISH ■ P-3 ■ METAL PANEL mom-' MORTAR GREY r P-4 ACCENT ARCHITECTURAL GR METAL SIDING f P-5(ACCENT) ■ NICHIHASPRUCE ACM KOLIBRI BLUE SPRUCE WOOD PANEL BUILDING -3 NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ e e e In e o ❑ ❑ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ❑ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ e ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ®®®®®® ®®®® ® ®®®®a U&®®®®®® EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATIO April 8, 2021 - ZA21-0007 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: PAINT COLOR SCHEME: MATERIALS: BUILDING - 1: 35'-0" l P-1 ALUMINUM/ E _ _ 'i ❑ WINTER WHITE ■ STOREFRONT BUILDING -2: 35'-0" _ GLAZING ❑ CONCRETE TILT-UP FOGGY FOGGY GREY El PANEL W/TEXTURED BUILDING -3: 35'-0" - FINISH 0 MORTAR GREY ■ METAL PANEL L.. ■ P-4 ACCENT m METAL SIDING ARCHITECTURAL GR ■ P-5(ACCENT) ■ NICHIHA ACM KOLIBRI BLUE SPRUCE WOOD PANEL BUILDING -3 NONE F ®®®® NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION " " y.a EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION �X� X May 20, 2021IZ14 + e e� a• .Lb`.. ��Illljjj MINE .1��..� View at Entrance w Ir i Section at North Property line 1235 Woodsey Ct Q Southlake,Texas S• jGoogle Street View it. 1•' y..r by •'* ``.i_ )�+err t —`,� •.. I,a,'. .;��— �11 %• {`�.� :�� _ •,.�. 3� � > _ _.y'".. - _- - - art Google Image capture:Oct 2018 02021 Google United States Terms Report a problem Street View t 1235 Timberline Ct v Southlake,Texas S ~ Google _ ^ x 4. Street View i $ . 1 1. —�`f�� � - Ems. -' ._ • - . -...���`;��-''� � + Image capture:Oct 2018 2021 Gooyle United States Terms Report a pYoblem Street View Variance Request • • • i 1 1 • • ig Tree Canopy Cover Summary Total Site Area 1,142,780(sf) • / Total Existing Canopy Coverage(sf) 253,758.5 22.3%of site � •w�® Pr. Required Preservation 38,063.8 15 Cn o fisting P ® • \j • e \ Current Preserved(sf) 70,125.1 27.6%of Existing �, • Gd �-,R. Canopy �! \ Tree Inches Being Removed "e • _ • Total Tree Inches Removed 8,380.1 _ y Total Tree Canopy SF Removed 183,633.4 • Total Tree Canopy Percent Removed 72.4%of Existing CanoPY "•' ,,.• " ::' �®. •• Refired canopy to be preserved — 60%* Y�' � •` _• •� Proposed canopy to be preserved — 27.6% •Es • may. jR ' �I • �• • _•- i,�,1p � ` G- EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO �C V., ; [ BE REMOVED Variance Requested OW # ,• g'� ' EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO i i A BE PROTECTED • ®� `. XXXX EXISTING TREE TO BE �� •sw ® � � � �• "�: � �-., REMOVED � •� ��� �; �,N; � �� � xxxx EXISTING DECUNING+HAZARD � E� • `- Z TREE TO BE REMOVED t'4'a.L�jR ' a _- l —pit - --'�_. �tw EXISTING TREE TO BE �� _l V� _ PROTECTED s GRAPHIC SCALE Iv FEET 0 25 50 100 TREE PROTECTION FENCING, 1 REF.DETAIL A,THIS SHEET O �0;0 -- °°s •+�eve ®®® I a` e e! o ±� a' e:o.e,e.es. .e.e.e.nid0 �m®oomm®C# ob1 O 11'01i, :r.� me PROPOSED BUILDING REP.ARCHITECTURE PRO ED BUILDING PER ARCHITECTURE Ott:;R 4 a0 a. aMR REP.ARCHITECTURE PRO SEDBUILDING o" lea . I r:� ,-.r or. , ,,''�♦�.♦�.•.•♦•♦•♦ ONM i j .°• •• r•rr • V+ e° ° °a°°e • Previous Overall landscape Plan ' LEGEND REP.ARCHITECTURE — - 3 BUFFER REQUIRED PLANTINGS RE SITE REQUIRED PLANTINGS n 9 - e s _ z TREE MITIGATION PLANTINGS - s _ L] EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN PROPOSEDBUILDING --- Q REF.ARCHITECTURE ?ROPOSED BUILDING - 2 1 REF ARCHITECTUREmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm C _ 03gg •�"'�- PROPOSED BUILDING .... REF.ARCHITECTURE 1 - -- -�..� 7 2 Z m 'OmPROPOSED BUILDING F - i REF.ARCHITECTURE n -. • [BEE: OIE RFISE FFiFPEXtF - Ix J ,Iml�Ut.iOP.: L.n� — o 0 " LANDS U ,. .. MUST I S QQ ( CAPE COLORED PLAN II ANC BUSINESS PARK a� utOXcI rP Wrr4m3turw� 0. Aesfma IN t Cut haet IM U Torrent County,Tava May 20 2021 ZA21-0039 111111■ � mow■ �``��.Ira�,� �11111�� i� wi�i�r��ti lir�l��v ,�■ { I Surrounding Property Owner Responses CITY OF 1E' j owl �c�� _. ^ ••�^ _ � �f..j•., t,yam ��, ,. jo v li r 7`r)' 7 a .: ter)•, -- - —_ _ �- t4 _t a 198 l rFi • i .— f - 'F. S� � - �,+'✓ ��m.. - $,`� �_3' r .. �- / / North ' t Kimley>»Horn Page16 -� � -- ---- Table 3-Traffic Operational Results-Weekday AM Peak Hour 2021 2023 2023 2028 2028 Background Background _ Existing Background plus Background plus INTERSECTION APPROACH Traffic Traffic Site Traffic Traffic Site Traffic - " MI Peak Hour MI Peak Hour MI Peak Hour M1 Peak Hour MI Peak Hour DEUY DEUY DEUY DEUY DEUY , LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS Isa�ae0 (S.'" Iss2vel (S-e1 kW-N-'c8 74.8 E K,_ F 81.0 F 80.5 F 79.3 E _ IA6tang DrrvelCourt Musteng-We 45.5 D 47.5 D 48.3 D a- E .2 E „I ^�^ "-'d^•^ SH 26-W 25.7 C 24.0 C 35.1 D 25.0 C 39.3 D SH 20 �E (FeE ill-Avenue) SH 2B-Sg 1D2 B ''14 B 12D B 18.9 B 19.1 B Ie - Overall 25.1 C 25.0 C 332 C "A C 40.3 D SW.w' D.5 A 9.5 A 9.7 A we A D9 A �II Msfary Cout� kWswrq-WBL 8.1 A 8.1 A 82 A 8.1 A 82 A � I _.".• SauNwesk!m So-eM MusterM-EBL SW-$B' 10.4 B fO.B B 115 g 10.8 8 11.g B I Liq Suy-ConrroAe4 APPmxM1 a zeE in Tkne PerioO Table 4-Traffic Operational Results-Weekday PM Peak Hour ri, •g• 2023 2028 Q 2021 2023 2028 rr I� Background Background _ Existing Background Background INTERSECTION PROAC Traffic Traffic plus Traffic plus H Site Treific Site Traffic -^ ,.,.�• \`�-, \ PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak� Hour DEUY DEUY DEUY DEUY DEUY 1 LOS Hmve1 LOS ls+uer LOS laa+uel LOS laar'e1 LOS 1As ng.Eg 84.0 E 65.5 E 70.2 E 679 E 73.2 E kLstang 0-Caun BWsrang-We 527 D 57.0 E 57.9 E B].1 E 880 E SH@25 Sh'28 Ng '�4.0 B 15.5 B t5.8 B t88 B / / (kaE Wo Avenuel 5:-128 SB 92 A 14.3 B 14.5 B 234 C 259 C Overall 11.] B 21.5 C 22.4 C 28.2 C 30.3 C _; _ ►' 39,. - / / North / SW-_W 8.1 A 03 A B.4 A 8.1 A 1D0 A ---� � / 'Q'9 NN T� � \ Mink4q Court® MusLrg-WBL 8.164 A 8.1 A 8-4 A SW-SB' 9.8 A 10.0 A 11.1 B 10.1 B 11.3 B StoP-ConvalleE ApproxM1 Sgal�eE LIn ¢etl -No movements in Tme Penotl Traffic Impact Analysis Table 5-Traffic Operational Results-Alternative AWSC Analysis 2028 2028 Background Background plus plus INTERSECTION APPROACH Site Traffic Site Traffic • The proposed site driveways provide the appropriate AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour DELAY LOS DELAY LOS level of access for the development. (SEC/vm (SECN9H) SW NB' 8.1 A 7.2 A Mustang-EB'4 w 7A.... 83 A • The intersection of Mustang Court and Southwestern Mustang Court@ nnstang-w6= 10.1 B 9_, A Street does not meet All-Way STOP Control traffic Southwestern Street SW-SB' L9.4 A 9.5 A volume warrants with existing or future volumes, so Overall A 9.1 i A 'Stoo-ControlledAwroach the intersection should be signed as Two-Way STOP- Control. a a Q • , There are not expected to be any queues developing ❑ ii on the property. In both peak hours, the rate of vehicles entering the property is less than one per minute, and the rate of vehicles exiting the property is f likewise less than one per minute. Traffic Impact Analysis The proposed new driveway intersection ENTRANCE .....................-............ - - - should be moved north to create IFUD 9 o 8FR(2) ALTERNATIVE 2, 9 p OUTSIDE WHEEL PATH additional separation between i intersections. 301, OBS'`Jr'11.47.E- • At a minimum, the south drive should be F v,. l 36.77 N37" relocated as shown in Figure 1 . .................................. R30' 55 7' \ N82'15'29"E Nat 4.66' AH (2) .\ 64�, . dH ALTERNATIVE 1, __ OUTSIDE WHEEL PATH 00 \ 4-Way Stop control is recommended for 39' 57`44'21"W PROPOSED 2.89 AC-FT \ the intersection of Mustang Court and DETENTION AREA 42 0' l ALTERNATIVE 3 / l 5 3g e a7 NEWTHRUROAD \ Southwestern Street. o I� /!-10'30' LZO-00' i ce-- 8' C-86.05' ^ ALTERNATIVE 1, NEW CURB • A secondary public road access should, EX FH ci f be included for a development of this :CESS 8 ILITY E EMENT "� size.. 1 \ 1 1 t 1 1 i till / / / / 1 %/ J Emergency only access driveway GENERAL SITE DATA LOT AREA(SQUARE FEET AND ACRES) 1,142,803 SF/26.27 AC EXISTINGZONING 11(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) PROPOSEDZONING SP-1 - _ EX LAND USE VACANT {•-i' .: ""' ..� ,. LAND USE DESIGNATION INDUSTRIALAND100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN PROP LAND USE SPECULATIVE DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE BUILDING HEIGHT(pSTORIES) 39'TO42'-6"/1STORY � I MAX BUILDING HEIGHTALLOWED PER SP-1 45FT BUILDINGAREA 340,180SF BUI LDI N G AREA BY USE: I� `= OFFICE(15%) 51,025SF WAREHOUSE(85%) 289,155 SF BUILDING COVERAGE AREA 29.809/6 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 69.139% IMPERVIOUS AREA 790,057 SF m I PERCENTAGE OPENSPACE 30.87% AREA OPENSPACE 352,746SF PARKING TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 4605PACE5 'I - { -- --- -- TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED STANDARD 1O SPACES(9 REQUIRED) - - HANDICAP 452SPACES r�"� ------ -----' '^° AL 'y TOTAL 462SPACES 1 SPACE PER 1,000 SF OF WAREHOUSE 1 SPACE PER 3W SF OF OFFICE 31 ' REQUIRED LOADING SPACES 17 SPACES(6,SOOSF) PROVIDED LOADING SPACES REFERENCE PLAN FOR LOADING ZONES \ AREA OF OUTSIDE STORAGE OSF a9; I _ PERCENTAGE OF OUTSIDE STORAGE 01A _ / \ ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION START DATE: Jun-21 CONSTRUCTION END DATE: Jan-23 — -- = Variances requested to allow a 0' stacking depth and no sidewalk Emergency only access driveway " " u w RAL SITE DATA GOT AREA(SQUARE FEET AND ACRES) 1,142,803 SF/26.27 AC -- ————— - - ———— —60— _EXISTINGZONING 11(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) 'I I PROPOSEDZONING SP-1 a \ I FFFFTYTT TITT111 1111 _ - -r� - ^• IS ��^ . EX LAND USE VACANT ITZ LAND USE DESIGNATION INDUSTRIAL AND 1OD-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN PROP LAND USE SPECULATIVE DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE BUILDING HEIGHT(#STORIES) 39'TO 39'-9"/1 STORY I MAX BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED PER SP-1 40 FT BUILDINGAREA 340,180SF i BUILDING AREA BY USE: it ...•»..m a °�, ,w„-= OFFICE(6%) 20,410SF ° I WAREHOUSE(94%) 319,770SF BUILDING COVERAGE AREA 29.8D% - IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 65.80% _ IMPERVIOUS AREA 752,059SF - PERCENTAGE OPENSPACE 34.20% • u a n, .o AREA OPENSPACE 390,745 SF ICU PARKING a; SL TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED' 388 SPACES ' .,. .. m TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED STANDARD 382SPACES _ HANDICAP 10 SPACES(9 REQUIRED) TOTAL 392 SPACES . \ •1 SPACE PER 1,000 SF OF WAREHOUSE ..yp •1 SPACE PER 300 SF OF OFFICE REQUIRED LOADING SPACES 17 SPACES(6,500 SF) PROVIDED LOADING SPACES REFERENCE PLAN FOR LOADING ZONES AREA OF OUTSIDE STORAGE OSF PERCENTAGE OF OUTSIDE STORAGE 0% 1, ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION START DATE: Jun-21 Ib CONSTRUCTION END DATE: Jan-23 ' Variance requested to allow a 0' stacking depth Row of parking removed a— III _ IFFIRt .. Height 39'3" M Height 42 6 —- ' �= = Height 39 Height 40' o Access easement provided J. 4. 11111,1111-All HIM is I a r m FI� I _ ------------ �.-Millw --a f{3 i .._ a _. —— �f IIl11.T11T� X Height 39' Height 39'9" �o.o....w Driveway relocated 5'sidewalk provided February 25, 2021 -- April 8, 2021 Tree Canopy Cover Summary Total Site Area 1.142,780 s Total Existing Canopy Coverage(sj 253,758.5 22.3%of site 15%of Existing Required Preservation 38,063.8 Canopy Current Preserved(sj 55,020.5 21.6%of Existing = Canopy Tree Inches Being Removed t 4` Total Tree Inches Removed 8,857.7 Total Tree Canopy SF Removed 198,738.0 78.4%of Existing Total Tree Canopy Percent Removed Cano quired canopy to be preserved — 60% 'ArM- 7 ' - "- - P osed to be reserved — 21.6% o canopy F p pY p EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO , I r{ *4*F- BE REMOVED EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO BE PROTECTED F xX x EXISTING TREE TO BE A 5 it - �. s..,f` i REMOVED = 0: ' -- ,•yji - - [� � xroa EXISTING DECUNING+HAZARD i'• R- _ M- - - TREE TO BE REMOVED - t._._: Vic;:: 2+ ;� •L�j$..;.-9 * F x ,� EXISTING TREE TO B .• _ Irr - PROTECTED GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 TREE PROTECTION FENCING, REF.DETAIL A,THIS - - - -- - - --L- c — — ---- - BUILDINGMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: .�_ NORTH ELEVATION P-2 El FOGGY GREY MORTAR GREY P-4 ACCENT w:JRIF-—��-�mmm mm -_ mm =��_L..le€ fARCHITECTURAL GRAY ELEVATIONEAST •KOLIBRI lily mmmmm��mmm�mm�_l■� STOREFRONT TILT-UPCONCRETE . WEST ELEVATION FINISH METAL PANEL IMF METAL SIDING tz3�:■e��_r=__n n !������l�■71������!€n a=_���_■■_�ie�i ' SPRUCE ... , SOUTHPANEL • 1 �. .► . A Previous Elevations Building 1 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: - —BUILDING-1: 42'•6" -- PAINT COLOR SCHEME: MATERIALS: BUILDING-2: 40'-0" —--- -—— ❑ P-1 ■ ALUMINUM/ �" - NbL��II111111°Rl�nn WINTERWHITE STOREFRONT BUILDING -3: 39'-0" ( _ GLAZING If P-2 CONCRETE TILT-UP f 2 ❑ FOGGY GREY PANEL W/TEX URED - FINISH ■ P-3 ■ METAL PANEL MORTAR GREY ■ P-4 ACCENT METAL SIDING --- ARCHITECTURAL GR, ■ P-5(ACCENT) ■ NICHIHA ACM KOLIBRI BLUE SPRUCE WOOD PANEL BUILDING - 2 ®®®® ®®ll®® ml Mfg NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION ■ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N 0 0 0 0 o N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .� EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION RAN vx�%v�.x a ► i ' f February 25, 2021 Previous Elevations MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: - -BUILDING-1: 42'•6" -- PAINT COLOR SCHEME: MATERIALS: BUILDING-2: 40'-0" ❑ P-1 ■ ALUMINUM/ WINTER WHITE STOREFRONT BUILDING -3: 39'-0" 9 GLAZING 2 ❑ P-2 CONCRETE TILT-UP FOGGY GREY PANEL W/TEXTURED FINISH ■ P3 ■ MORTAR GREY METAL PANEL 3 P-4 ACCENT METAL SIDING ARCHITECTURAL GR ■ ■ NICHIHA ACM KO(ACCENT) BLUE SPRUCE WOOD PANEL BUILDING -3 .A. ■ MIKE- iL NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION _ I p w ■ o ❑ o ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ❑ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ❑ ❑ H H H H m H EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION February 25, 2021 Y � d+ 00.E-0 �•p+QO 11_r'. a. oa % m® S> PROPOSED BUILDING L REF.ARCHITECTVR6 ad i'4m�4+� ISM ,'a�e.o.o�n�s.q.n a..g..►ja. ®0®00' - PROPOSED BUILDING REF ARCHITECTURE e gem ©m© vc�o�ti D � i o4a ioU At I' o �i PRO SEC)BUILDING REF ARCHITECTURE MIN F MINA IVA i� i Previous Overall landscape Plan • February1 21 11111 1 111 Illllr 111 1111 1 1 Illill 1 1 Intl�tl 11 1 �11 111 llll 1111 I I I I-Mll111111'ITMTft]JIT Al POINT A-LOOKING SOUTH POINT B-LOOKING SOUTH a . ►�i�i�il ►�i�i�i�i w Previous line of Sight Exhibits April S, 2021 PROPOSED EMERGENCY ACCESS GATE ♦� -IT - �'� ` POINT C-LOOKING SOUTH Nil Bnm decfbn-at Plantlfgd a110 Yfs J POINT A-LOOKING SOUTH POINT B-LOOKING SOUTH Revised Line of Sight . ,.* a pm loin MA - ZYfir. �- � _ _ •` L. .,.I '� 1 Fit ,B•. .t�^-' �f� . - a -�., ..a�.< r:.,p�'- � :.« « y.� �. . tie 71 ' � -� .�'. � {, � �'' t" t a �r�A'• �rx ytl�.r � mill t IMM loan■►, t 1ONIN 111111 a �►� 4'■iim ME = Jim mill HOME Hall FEE Ho ONE=: +�■■■ I, ■ loss milli JI • INNER , Pathways Master Plan o+o+mop; 44 4>4m ,�y,a o 11111110 ' 4aP0f0 B1B0 9goDg4 pQ�a^ OO M O PROPOSED BU'II ING REF.ARCHITECTURE P POSED BUILDING REF.kRCHITECTURE yzn e�,� ■ ej • , ®B d, Fie lw r, P ®Nm LP 4 t PROPOSED BUILDING REF.ARCHITECTURE REF.ARCHITECTUR E a i • , V °b a 44.�' �4�4T444sa�4esa arao�o ,��� zTj 44'�o',po4 y44 -. �4� —Aff 2&2 000 Y tT'$4 q°?ez�,«O^q® 40008a00®ec$oT o 00b0a4o4®OGO C ..♦.' oo"'� .444' �jpeoo 00,0�0 ��j���j�e�♦ Previous Overall landscape Plan lil R [g��pYe O f 04 fr a ;a tl a��` Ay�'U.._':Gam° p ".� �"� « M' ;!" l .♦.......♦...� i 00'�A�� ■`mac GD. �O��SJ OO r+?I @ .6�Aa��r {....k�. 4a1 .♦......♦. (1 • / �° 9 fir.9.' �� i•.r t@k4_: �� �4C � Revised Overall landscape Plan ;:�;a� IIIIIII� s � ae c. _ 0 4 � MMPROPOSED BUILDING Willi A ' Previous Landscape Plan LP1 .01 u�uuo O o B >: ����� �:�► ►� Ts�► �T� 4.. .► -.1iti,rr,. � Cy10JaiT�;��e�y SWI + wo v "g o PROPOSED BUILDING REF.ARCHITECTURE ° Revised Landscape Plan LP1.01 LP 1.01 C LP103 ©� 4 0 LP 1.04 J.� / ¢ 1 CV III ,a I LP 1.05 LP 1.06 S. El El North -" g —IF TANDS PE PLAN W MUSTANG BUSINESS PARR d / Mefa61IPN. Beleg Z°.29 Acrea Out Ot TM 1 1 Ca0 Gbnwaay, Hecker Fbrriaon Survey rn _______________________ _ ____ _ \ _ Abalrect eSB Treel lB9 I] T zoaaa B Z MATCH IINE SHEET 1P 1.04` - City of Southieke,Temen!County.Texea g February 25, 2021 LP 1.02 Ay r.. A ' 1 O • O � L��� � IIIIIII� asps" ��� ��<Q�,a,�DO�e` •�i� muu® .A Ijrt V� • Revised Landscape Plan LP1.02 -77' --- ------------------------A—C—LI—E-SHEET ---0----------------------------- LP 1.01 1 _ :_ o 17 — — i 11 1 d ❑ — U 1 �LP102 1 S ® p o o 1� LP 1.03LP 1.04 1 8� PROPOSED• $BUILDING ' 1 REF.ARCHITECTURE LP 1.05 i -- ---- - d LP 1.06 i LP107 1 z LL i— z a� North c. . MATCH LINE SHEET LP 1.05 -� z �,{ " "w„„"`•,"".— O n��..�..wm.wo,.am..« LANDSCAPE PLAN W 0. O .,..,.,,,.....�..,.,,.,,, ..h...v....,a.,„�.,. MUSTANG BUSINESS PARK 0. ❑ Nisaalfa6NON. BeLy 28.2T Acrea Out OI The U O ••�•-aam.w.r.w' 6m �•e��Mlw'Na4Y. Decker.Aerrison Cw1. a y W 0 'but—A., eesee.Tre t— (Zn 0 Z mev J February 25, 2021 D,�a,�an�eAe.Te tDann bre m submitted February 01,2021 a�eaem Previous Landscape Plan LP1 .03 ° ■ f�� ,e Y..MV •�.vo A - - f{;' il. Ji aQP�P�9�9 _"=►-=.e ,�mow:, .9�H r�t6i�� _� ❑ O .t o \ O Revised Landscape Plan LP1.03 _ N MATCH UNE SHEET LP 1.02 = LP 1.01 � �_ .-- ❑ 1 8 -- - --------------- - i LP 1.03 LP 1.04 -O \ \ ^ wj 1 1 LP 1.05 1'o to o •��i � E R '"""., -- ----- LP 1.07PRO® OSED BUILDING REF.PARCHITECTURE i a 4 -----I E ° E R } Z - f ; T Q a°o Tim 1 � I North Z N owrtscn�e � THUN—SHED LP 1fi C - 0 ��--,•—YM � MUSTANG BUSINESS PARK Q / 1 w...t.n 6elaM. ee1nP fe.zT scree oet or me U O ❑❑ � � Call aany°u ao. Weak.,•,wrr;.on sw.ey ti _ _ O � Abelrect C99,Taect IB9 � .n n r —x-.v,.-.- y '°'^Yee' •"^ „y „®,,,,,,,„,—,,,,,,�,,�„�,., Clty of South eke,,Terse t County,Teas O S b "t a e brmry 01 P021 February 25, 2021 = -- ,,.Yw...Ye„ C LP 1.04 k e 1 +++ + — +++++ z . .. LP 1 01 ; r. _ .___ L7 ` ', I I __—__—— i D�i --- _TIT F ++ +r EJ M / nEF.w<r.E<n.E E LP 1 02 .LP 1.03 LP 1.04 � 1 7 � F LP 1.05 --------------- LP 1.06 ew�wW li .M` PROPOSED BURDINO\ i t—_ REF.ARCNRECTURE I _t'� " 07 77 i --� _ z V5 s` •� li' - 'm �8 North I17 - = _ i __- ---"I" p Z / �+ - ---- -------- Z7_+7++++ -++ iT++ +++ +++�--------- -- 5 TGHU�E�HEET LP1.06 + a W77 PLAN MUSTANG / E O • --�— p __�,�_, ® •—�•�••••__ TANG BUSINESS IS Bf&SS PARK o _____ —---- r serer....,, �<«��.�.. z April 8, 2021 _ a= ..._ j � r•.�-rr rron.n POP- Revised Landscape Plan LP1.04 N^ 0 -- LP 1.01 *_ ❑ 0 MATCH NNE SHEET LP 1.W 4 -- �-----------------�— -- -------------------------------- ------ --------;. R — ❑ I � 1 LP102 `\ _ 6� 1 ;' LP1-03 i LP 1.04 tR E3 E3 E3 E3 E3 EE3 E3 E3 E31 5 E c LP 1.06 e- i LP "J ---'- —�-t -uF _'_ c- -� ! .... PROPOSED BUILDING 1 g I REF.ARCHITECTURE ki x A e 1� Y l I 1i a 1n 1 1 ® 1 W Z 1 — — � 1 wx m North -� ° ----------------------------�- -------------------------- s MATCH UNE SHEET LP 1.07 1 S {� ( nurtsc�oue O O LANDSCAPE PLAN W p Y ����..... O �.. �..a � MUSTANG BUSINESS PARK Q / 1 w..xnaa u. Befng ANC Acne out Ot The U Call tronwuaa. Decker,xeneon Cw.ey, rn m .X....w ., w.n...�. G © a AWtrect�9B.Ti k IB3 p 4y T 0 bm tt d F 6ruary 01 2021 February 25, 2021 o e �, at= M � I LP 1.05 �- e' • a u . - - - • - - - -� -.,tea = ■ e@ Of 1[ 1A !l 1 1 1 1,.� 1..1 L� Nnl 1 [�w 1 to Revised Landscape Plan LP1.05 - - -- -- ------------ ---------- ---------------------- - ---- -- wicxulEs�T Lria LP 1.01 -»....,.. ........�... .J LP 1.02 .•� -� a j i ru�a,rt a PROPOSED BULDING L REF PRCHRECTURE10 LP 1.03 LP 1.04 LP 1.05 12 LP 1.06 it S1 I r l I t t - go I W North t .� ..Y Z 1 nrfnFgn� J > __ O _ ••••••.•—•�'�•• ❑ aw.pnMbr, xr n e.r..Oat at far Q nv .a+r.E.m�doa 9to'at1. 0 / .D.ss.ex n.ee ten = t) Comtl farar g >February 25, 2021 ; - -- =�=== '`= °"i�;` �-� - -m �- =� ii -+.iW�PyN�M1A.n�hN��avr�i �1 d�, LP 1.06 Previous Landscape Plan xg�r O r IIIIIII� o � �W1II > o r ��� :ems gg �� � o ;�� I�[�'�1■ � � �- I -•..... I- ..ti A.;�SY1$:S':L�.�'1ST.Q3.�.1C1.�.�.QI.�.�:�.�iil�.�3.�i�.�k� /dry. . O ,: ..-� ���� [� • .... " �;4ET�'�"���"��'e�s��.� a•�:�«Yj'�s��c��p>�'Y®Z"iDZ'4�:4T�T�l:�.�.b"i�+�� r c.� o°� O O 6 y O '�`' p7.� Q F ��►.O • a_ C w_ _ O O O Revised Landscape Plan LP1.06 LP 1.01 -------------- -J LP 1.02 ` t LP103 LP 1.04 M1TCHLK SHEET[P1.05 iZIO �• .awe`°�n� \ � s'�7`i �������r�r�s����N������s�N� - ����N���N��������� �Y�� -. o — EM LP 1.05 --- ---- •,• oo as© � •Q• Q ._ m LP 1M 12 i ----------�-- ..,... - .•. - LT.,.,. 1 Z g North ._ IL �Ma•[t �.Met aB9 1 ® - Z � � .«�._...._ n.�w''.wn'v'v`.wv'".�^` saes.[s•were..rtt.r,t c.t•g.1Me g El 0 __.__ _�._�Md x�rowteta aaarwxs at raze February 25, 2021n�w�N�;:..= LP,07 36' O n.l nrtl ���� � o IIIIII1� O � a.e 1 e� o _ `� , ' •" 1 �.. �. �',, �� q�l R 43 t.0 tt O 9 .O O q O @ 90, O O � � �O r-..'A�.�4 r•d Anr�ay 1'r O O� � , � O 6 Oa O O �O O O r- ti O O plt► ® O O O 9 O ������ 3 A O e'JC O O O u as _`� ro 0 o Q o•�_,o��� o O Revised Landscape Plan LP1.07 /\\ IIIIIII� q iR ■�+_•.,mi nm n1_ nn nm nm nm nn'rinm nin n 11111/1111 11111 �{i -- 1 1111 1111 IIIY1,1 I111 11111�1111 111 .L� i _ iF� Ali il� ■1111111.11JU111111111ju r � 1 1 1 11 �� 1 1 ■ 1,�I�� ,11� �� - Previous Preliminary Utility Plan �o o 11111110 o ©� MINING 21 IS —r,�eaa�■.�� �a-:�a �.,� ,� '�as'�■r`a� �qla�,•__�n.a�i.�i��.,`��,, = ,� �-�= ,�- , Ill .gym ❑ ,,-,.� �, f�� ...� ,.gym = � . ,�.�•�•, Previous Preliminary Grading Plan ( North) 8�1 �o 'WER, .r. . 1 fi�r � ,a�►..�9� ILr■. I�r■ �� --- r� % `.. .1. I: .ICI ��' ! '\ �I EN �F*I Al LLJ Previous Preliminary Grading Plan (South) /\ IIIIIII� G'W _��11 111111 11111��� 11111 111111 111� �Illl 11111� I{'� ■ 1 'IMM Revised Preliminary Utility Plan 811 �o �o �o IIII • I'�L��G�:1►�IL•-.- !:c�111 Cl11 ..0��- L � ,.I I.":��111_��..•1 111_�.�_ ���11 F" n w WIN NA nil 0009201 IVA a. Revised Preliminary Grading Plan ( North) o �o o i f�`.— .: !:" '�� � P`IG�■.. r .a1■. Ili kd� O Xr il�is �k.._1I ...R.�: .�.y. �_.�►rA i 1 = I VA Revised Preliminary Grading Plan (South ) C Building 3 Masonry Exhibit