Loading...
Item 6 - SPIN Report 0SOUTHLAK,E SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN2022-16 City Case Number: N/A Project Name: 1100 Raven Bend Ct. SPIN Neighborhood: 6 Meeting Date: June 14, 2022 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: 15 Hosts: Madeline Oujesky Applicant Presenting: J.D. Kearney, Phone: (817) 879-7719, Email: jdkearneylrCa�gmail.com City Staff Present: Madeline Oujesky, Assistant to the Director Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting hftp://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on"I Want to"and"View" "Video on Demand"—forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: Property Situation: 1100 Raven Bend Ct. An applicant is proposing to re-plat a property from 1-acre into two 0.5-acre plots and make neighborhood improvements Development Details: The applicant has tried making capital improvements to their property since 2015. Massive erosion and flooding from a developer caused the applicant 7 years in litigation. The City is in- work on a capital project that can partially alleviate issues on the applicant's property. Re-plat re-investment plan: • Offset the increase in construction costs (inflation of material and labor) associated with remediation of flooding • Sidewalks on all public-facing sides of the new and existing property • Upgrade communal Raven Bend Ct. entry way and monument • Potential to invest in other jointly-derived communal Raven Bend Ct. upgrades A re-platted 1100 RBC has 8ft more spacing than the current Raven Bend corner-to-corner home density. Presentation: The property at 1100 Raven Bend Court (1100 RBC) is a 1986 ranch style house with 4 beds and 3 baths We are very early in the process to re-plat our property at 1100 Raven Bend Court from 1 acre to 2 x--0.5 acre properties 1100 Raven Bend Court replat process and status We are herel IM2MMM�� IMIMIMIMIM Raven Bend Court is located at the hard right turn on North Peytonville, between the Sr. High and Dove road Raven Bend location DehaHoTelsoymamoTijb � - Dallas Southlake ti,hz _r t:arroll Highhl. ho,0 Je P _ ' NAP,• All, Bicerppinfaf I.9 Tom Thumb � - Pa'rk�. _ W5ouN1>ke�d F For scale...1100 RBC is roughly the size and shape of a football field —40 yards deep and 120 yards wide. —————————— !�T I,. 100 RAVEneft N The Kearneys have been trying to make capital improvements to their property and Raven Bend (to the benefit of all neighbors)since 2015 Kearney proposed property improvements VYi IEk E rA 00 PAVII Unfortunately,massive erosion and flooding from a developer caused the Kearneys to spend 7 years in litigation... Issues with developer 4 7 4W Property line 7 Initial erosion,filling in east west swale 7j* River of water from detention pond and under wall ...an issue that persists to this day Persistent flooding 1 i rl` L= Point 1 a portion of the re-plat funds will be used to offset inflation of construction materials since lawsud bids were created- The Kearney's spent 7 years in litigation with the developer and won a near-unanimous verdict on the 2 main charges' Developer litigation outcome(Tarrant county Cause No.096-293017-17)t Code/ordinances Jury charge Did the Shady Oaks Defendants divert or impound the natural flow of surface water or permit a diversion or Yes 1. Texas Water Code 11.086 impounding to continue in a manner that 2. South lake Code of Ordinances.Sec. damaged Plalntlfrs properly? 9.5-65(g) Was the diversion or impoundment,or permitting the diversion of impoundment Yes to continue,intentional? Texas Water Code 11.086 Southlake Code of Ordinances.Sec.9."S(g) No person may divert or impound the Diversion or impoundment:All drainage systems shall be designed to prevent the natural flow of surface waters in this diversion or impoundment of the natural flow of surface water in a manner that state,or permit a diversion damages the property of another by the flow of the water diverted or impounded. or impounding by him to continue,in a The director of public works shall place in each developer's agreement a manner that damages the property of provision requiring the developer to compty with all applicable laws,including,but another by the ovemow of the not limited tio,section 1(1)086,Texas Water Code.In addition,the director of water diverted or impounded. public works shall place on each plat that receives final approval,a statement that reads as follows: Compliance with the provisions of the city's storm drainage policy does not relieve a person of the responsibility of comptying with all other applicable laws, including,but not limited to,section 1(1)086,Texas Water Code. 1. Since the Keameys received a verdict in their favor in February-2022,the Keameys have settled with the derendant Point 2:a portion of the re-plat funds will be used to tie the engineered solution into the City capital project. The City is in-work on a capital project that can partially alleviate issues on the Kearney property(once in-work modifications) Southlake capital project overview M. If Mill Adtte­ D Proceeds from the re-platted Kearney property will be re-invested in 5 initiatives Re-plat re-investment plan 1. Offset the increase in construction costs(inflation of materials and labor) associated with remediation of flooding 2. Tie#1 into City of Southlake Capital project 3. Sidewalks on all public-facing sides of the new and existing property 4. Upgrade communal Raven Bend Court entry way and monument 5. Potential to invest in other jointly-derived communal Raven Bend Court upgrades(e.g.street signs,street lighting,etc.) r,. The current state of 1100 RBC is costing Southlake$100K+over the next 10 years, instead of generating$700K+of upside tax revenue Re-plat business case M 10yeartax revenue to Southlake Current state TAD value $435,000' $640,223� $3,768,476r assessment Approx.revenue to $926K Southlake over the next 10 Years^ $87K $206K We have sought concerns from our neighbors —what other concerns do you have/ see? The current Raven Bend neighborhood The re-platted 1100 RBC has 8 feet 1. Neighborhood density is zone low-density and by re-platting more comer-to-comer separation than tae�aea��ae eeiowl 1100 RBC,is would create discontinuity the current neighborhood(ex-1100 in neighborhood appearance RBC) 2. Neighborhood covenants Covenants don't allow for re-platting Re-platting would follow the democratic process outlined in the covenants Allowing a move from low-density to Raven Bend is surrounded on 3.75 3. Adjacent neighborhood density medium-density will create a mismatch sides by medium-density,or more-dense with adjacent neighborhoods land use(e.g.RPUD in Shady Oaks) Absolutely planning for sidewalks on all 4. Sidewalks Southlake residents love sidewalks! public-facing sides of the re-platted properties(per re-plat requirements) The new home will not match the current We will design the new house(and 5. Home design homes in Raven Bend Court update our current house)using a colonial or ranch style facade We plan to repurpose-25%of the trees as lumber in the construction of Our 6. Tree conservation Developing a new lot would require home.We have planted more than 20 removal of trees trees(nellie Stevens)on the re-platted land to date and have a plan to plant 50+more trees. 7. ?? A re-platted 1100 RBC has 8 feet more spacing than the current Raven Bend corner-to-corner home density Concern#1—neighborhood density(units=feet) 87 150 82 43 83 150 54 33 82 113 115 43 55 43 _ 99 99 79 113 115 33 51 43 +I 87 We have sought concerns from our neighbors —what other concerns do you have/see? The current Raven Bend neighborhood The re-pla0ed 1100 RBC has 8 feet 1 Neighborhood density is zone low-density and by re-platting more comer-to-comer separation than 1100 RBC-is would create discontinuity the current neighborhood(ex-1100 in neighborhood appearance RBC) 2. Neighborhood covenants Covenants don't allow for re-platting Re-platting would follow the democratic process outlined in the covenants 3. Adjacent neighborhood density Allowing a move from low-density to Raven Bend is surrounded on 3.75 cae H. W.eaw•, medium-density will create a mismatch sides by medium-density,or more-dense with adjacent neighborhoods land use(e.g.RPUD in Shady Oaks) Absolutely planning for sidewalks on all 4. sidewalks Southlake residents love sidewalks' public-facing sides of the re-platted properties(per r"at requirements) The new tame will not match the current We will design the new house(and 5. Home design homes in Raven Bend Court update our current house)using a colonial or ranch style fapde We plan to repurpose—25%of the trees as lumber in the construction of our 6. Tree conservation Developing a new lot would require home.We have planted more than 20 removal of trees trees(nellie Stevens)on the re-platted land to date and have a plan to plant 50+more trees. 7. ?? 14 Raven Bend is largely surrounded by medium-density (or more dense) land use neighborhoods Concern#3—adjacent neighborhood density —i, Key takeaways �1, e,3 °°e oo° • Raven Bend is surrounded on 3.75 sides by medium-density or more- _ dense land use(e.g.RPUD in 104 Shady Oaks) 9= N,,., • Cross Timbers is low density; however,it only borders—100 feet of B05 Raven Bend and is separated by Peytonville(a large-collector throughway) I o,e [SPA SINGLEFAMILY RESICENTIAL(MiniAe laU SF20A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL(Min 20,0005f Lal RPUD-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT _..- 15 We have sought concerns from our neighbors —what other concerns do you have/ see? The current Raven Bend neighborhood The re-platted 1100 RBC has 8 feet 1. Neighborhood density is zone low-density and by re-platting more comer-to-comer separation than 1100 RBC,is would create discontinuity the current neighborhood(ex-1100 in neighborhood appearance RBC) 2. Neighborhood covenants Covenants don't allow for re-platting Re-platting would follow the democratic process outlined in the covenants Allowing a move from low-density to Raven Bend is surrounded on 3.75 3. Adjacent neighborhood density medium-density will create a mismatch sides by medium!-tlensily or more-dense with adjacent neighborhoods land use(e.g.RPUD in Shady Oaks) Absolutely planning for sidewalks on all a. sidewalks Southlake residents love sidewalks! public-facing sides of the re-platted properties(per re-plat requirements) The new home voll not match the current We will design the new house(and 5. Home design homes in Raven Bend Court update our current house)using a colonial or ranch style fagade We plan to repurpose-25%of the trees as lumber In the construction of our 6. Tree conservation Developing a new lot would require home.We have planted more than 20 removal of trees trees(nellie stevens)on the re-platted land to dale and have a plan to plant 50+more trees. 7. ?? If you have any concerns,please don't hesitate to reach out—jdkearneyjr@gmail.com Questions and Concerns: Concern/Comment: We would like Raven Bend to be kept one house, 1-acre, low density. I do not want sidewalks to be put in. We support the applicants in the flooding issues they've had — it's been awful for them. I am opposed to the replatting. Concern/Comment: It is very hard to find 1-acre residential lots now-a-days. We do have deed restrictions in the neighborhood that prohibit dividing lots, so I don't know how that will be dealt with. Our neighborhood will not feel the same if it is not kept one house, 1-acre. Concern/Comment: I'm torn with this issue because I feel that people have the right to do what they want with their property; however, the neighborhood has a rural feel that everyone wants to remain intact. I feel for the applicant in their flooding issues. My concern is with subdividing the lot—what prevents that from happening with other lots in the neighborhood. It sets a precedent of sorts. As a taxpayer, I want to know who maintains the sidewalks if they are constructed. C: We are waiting on a concept for the water flow after improvements that completed at the corner of Peytonville. When Shady Oaks was proposed, there was a spacing requirement adjacent to low density lots. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials,City staff,and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Southlake Connect Results for the June 14, 2022 SPIN Town Hall Forum 8/3122,3:05 PM Everbridge-Reports Everbridge Suite City of Southlake-Citizen Alert(organization Admin) Logout Dashboard Universe Notifications Contacts Reports Settings- Access Reportsa Detailed.Notification Analysis>SPIN Town Hall Forum-June 14th Q Detailed Notification Analysis SPIN Town Hall Forum-June 14th DETAILS call Results ■275(2.77%)Attempted- Notification ID 2920856934160490 Confirmed Notification 7967(80.19%)Attempted Mode Live -Not Confirmed Notifi cation 198.(1.99%)Attempted- Noti Standard Not Connected Type N 1425(14.34%)Not Start Date Jun 13,.2022 Attempted Start Time 13:13:53 DDT 0 ■70(0.70%)Other Confirmation Yes Show details Requested Call Throttling Yes Attempts Over Time Duration 4hr(s) i.sk Message Voice/Text Format sk Voicemail Message Only Preference z 5k Delivery Order Organization Default Delivery Methods 0k ©a oa oa. oa v1 1.Primary SMS ,3��' 1�tia. 1,ti°'. ,,� ,, 2.Secondary SMS 3.Primary Email Hide details 4.Primary Mobile S.Secondary Email 6.Secondary Mobile Attempt Delivery Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt Totals 7.Home Phone Time Method 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8.Home Phone#2 9.Business Phone 10.TTY!TTD Device Jun 13, 2022 Primer 2208 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2217 13:19: y SMS 04 CDT Se con dary 56 742 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 807 SMS Primar y 548 1269 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1836 Email Primer y 48 366. 0 0 0 0 0 0.. 0 433 Mobile Secon dary 3 27 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 33 Email Totals 2878 2468 1571 850 451 221 54 16 3 8512 https://manager.everbridge.net/reports/notification Niew2920856934160490 1/6 8/31/22,3:05 PM Everbridge-Reports Attempt Delivery Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt.Attempt.Attempt Attempt Attempt Totals Time Method 1 2 3 4 5 6- 7 8 9 Secon dary 5 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Mobile Home. 7 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Phone Home Phone 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 #2 Busine ss 3 6. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Phone TTY/ TTD. 0 2 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 2 Device Jun 13, 2022 13:19: 2878 2468 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5414 04 CDT Sub Totals Jun 13, 2022 Primer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:24; ySMS. 04 CDT Secon dary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SMS Primer y 0 0 682 0 0 0 0 0 0 689 Email Primer y 0 0 637 443 0 0 0 0 0 1104 Mobile Secon dary 0 0 99 181 0 0 0 0 0 289 Email Secon dary 0 0 59 83 0 0 0 0 0 153 Mobile Home 0 0. 62 82 0 0 0 0 0 154 Phone Totals 2878 2468 1571 850 451 221 54 16 3 8512 https://manager.everbridge.net/reports/notification/view/292085693416049O 2/6 8/31/22,3:05 PM Everbridge-Reports Attempt Delivery Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt.Attempt.Attempt Attempt Attempt Totals Time Method 1 2 3 4 5 6- 7 8 9 Home Phone 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 #2 Busine ss 0 0 21 39 0 0 0 0 0 62 Phone TTY/ TTD 0 0 6 19 0 0 0 0 0 26 Device Jun 13, 2022 13:24'. 0 0 1571 850 0 0 0 0 0 2486 04 CDT Sub Totals Jun 13, 2022 Primer 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:29: y;SMS 04 CDT Secon dary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SMS Pri mar y 0 ,0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Emaif Primer y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mobile Secon dary 0 0 0 0 215 0 0 0 0 216 Email Secon dary 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 0 0 153 Mobile Home 0 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 44 Phone Home Phone 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 #2 Busine ss 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 22 Phone Totals 2878 2468 1571 850 451 221 54 16 3 8512 https://manager.everbridge.net/reports/notification/view292085693416049O 3/6 8/31/22,3:05 PM Everbridge-Reports Attempt Delivery Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt.Attempt.Attempt Attempt Attempt Totals Time Method 1 2 3 4 5 6- 7 8 9 TTV/ TTD 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 19 Device Jun 13, 2022 13:29: 0 0 0 0 451 0 0 0 0 457 04 CDT Sub Totals Jun 13, 2022 Primer 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:34: ySMS 04 CDT Secon dary 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 SMS Primar y 0 0 0 0.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Email Primer y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mobile Secon dary 0 ,0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Emaif Secon dary 0 0. 0 0 0 159 0 0 0 160 Mobile Home- 0 '0 0 0 0 37 32 0 0 71 Phone Home Phone 0 '0 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 7 #2 Busine ss 0 0 0 0' 0 17 16 0 0 33 Phone TTV/ TTD 0 0 0 0; 0 5 2 0 0 7 Device Totals 2878 2468 1571 850 451 221 54 16 3 8512 https://manager.everbridge.net/reports/notification/view292085693416049O 4/6 8/31/22,3:05 PM Everbridge-Reports Attempt Delivery Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt Attempt.Attempt.Attempt Attempt Attempt Totals Time Method 1 2 3 4 5 6- 7 8 9 Jun 13, 2022 13:34: 0 0 0 0 0 221 54 0 0 278 04 CDT Sub Totals Jun 13, 2022 Pri mar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:38: ySMS 17 CDT Secon dary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SMS Primer y 0 b 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Email Primer y 0 0 0 0.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mobile Secon dary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Email Secon dary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 Mobile Home 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phone Home Phone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 #2 Busine ss a '0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 11 Phone TTY/ TTD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 Device Jun 13, 2022 13,38' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 3 19 17 CDT Sub Totals Totals 2878 2468 1571 850 451 221 54 16 3 8512 https://manager.everbridge.net/reports/notification/view292085693416049O 5/6