Loading...
Item 6 - Land Use Plan Amendment Exhibits (3) Overview: the property at 1100 Raven Bend Court ( 1100 RBC) is a 1986 ranch style house with 4 beds and 3 baths -Ap •_ _` ;' +;ate :+ _ [. 1 _ __.._. .... _ .,o..._. _..�� - r+�+r.'.'rs�;,ram«�•s.,�.�'�c:a.. .-rsft�= • we are very early - process t• re-plat our property at 1111 Raven • Court from - to 2 x -0.5 acre properties 1100 Raven Bend Court replat process and status We are here! Land Use Land Use Topographic Zoning, SPIN Plan, DRC Plan, P&Z surveys and DRC Zoning P&Z concept plan Land Use and Land Use and Re-plat, City Re-plat, City Zoning, City Zoning, City Re-plat, DRC Re-plat, P&Z Council #1 Council #2 Council #1 Council #2 Overview: Raven Bend Court is located at the hard right turn on North Peytonville, between the Sr. High and Dove road Raven Bend location Delta Hotels by Marriott Dallas Southlake© z EIR m Je Carroll High_School z � S r n a i ©Tom Thumb � Bicentennial Park vlli � y south4a�uth W tiake Blvd d E Southlake Btvd ke 8N • z Carroll Senior ' � • e Q� �igh School Goa A 3 Overview: for scale . . . 1100 RBC is roughly the size and shape of a football field — 40 yards deep and 120 yards wide. [WNBaPWhL CGNTF�`L uNE RECORD — 3$$-72' arnRay 6IE.F;. PI 8V 5V 00' E — 364.92' _ IIV IR I T s -3 P..P. I +tr 75 aGY11/17E t ion'x 1E� WOW ■L64 56�i42 f 34 12' 5TRR RE5EYM ON OIRF � FAR FUMRE ET R.D.M'. 41 i Ld UYr ' y1 j11ti tyF• ti t '�• tit y, 7: rl.■.,`Y{;f: '.. j� N F RESIRAME #,. TLE MEkS- S W 33 28 111 I 7 fZ' I 69,5$' iJ2'III -•�d' 1100 YENn� 9Fr UP" WPVD Co PUa fir. 4 Section1 -1 : Completed Table 1 : Future Land Use Map Amendment and Table 2: Land Use Mix (if applicable). Table 1: Future Land Use Map Amendment Table To be completed for all proposed Future Land Use Asap amendments Tract(')or Acres or Current Proposed Current Land Use Proposed Land Use Lot(s) Sq.Ft. Zoning Existing Use(s) Proposed Use(s) Zoning Designation Designation 1 lot of Single family Single family 2 lots of 1 43,560 SH A residential residential SF20A Low Density Medium Density Total Acres or Square Footage �43,560 Section 1 -1 (con't): Completed Table 1 : Future Land Use Map Amendment and Table 2: Land Use Mix (if applicable). Table 2: Land Use Mix Table* Proposed Land Use Medium Density Land Use Percentage of Acreage Recommended Range from the Consolidated Land Use Plan Residential IOD% Single-family resid2ntia1, open space,civic use Section 1 -2: Map that clearly indicates the boundary of the proposed change and includes the land use designation of all surrounding properties ❑ Boundary of proposed change Medium Density1 (ShadyO. 1 TINIP.ER DR • , 921kh, 909 905 F 917 913 901 1111 917 I 918 9 1367, 1100 S".L R'%JC 1004 904 1000 HAVr.. ---� Bib 1101 C' 1204 � C'8 H}` 1202 1200 T `-�� l' 900 - UG}}TC - 617 y , z Low density • • • 1 01 LL (Raven Bend, - u01 818 1205 900 915 1001 914 905 HF[MSLE 12D4 C 1202 1200 812 y 1 51 817 1208 \ 'r_0+;��'.D�- .868 B 1114 r 1102 1112 1110 1106 1106 1104 f( / 1100 BOB r 01 816 8 1203 1205 TRAVIS CT o Section 1 -3: A letter that includes subsections a-g Please reference the letter included as part of the submittal package, titled "03-2022.07.20-LUP Letter, Section 1 -3 v3-DRAFT" Appendix of figures Figure 1 from section 1 -3(b) Erosion and flooding from Shady Oaks development a- y_�- , ' 1.� '�'�S� Z Imo: i1W 9 � ,n.,,i� �.,,, y•,�^ y_ �y?.T �1�. Figure 2 from section 1 -3(b) Flooding from Shady Oaks development ON WOW _ x Figure 3 from section 1 -3(c): the current state of 1100 RBC is costing Southlake $100K+ over the next 10 years, instead of generating $700K+ Re-plat business case 10 year tax revenue to Southlake CoordinatedCurrent state Current storm drainage solution . . . drainage re-platsolution solution + TAD value $435,0001 $840,2232 $3,768,4783 assessment Approx. revenue to $926K Southlake over the next 10 years4 $87K $206K t mol- l. Based on 2021 value as won in previous protest 2. Proposed TAD assessment for 2022 3. Proposed TAD assessment for 2022 for bordering properties in Shady Oaks,representing 1 and 2 improved homes(respectively)on the existing 1100 RBC site 4. Assumes 2%of assessed price goes to the City of Southlake and Carroll ISD and average annual basis increase of 4.5 • . • . � . i ' • • • • • • ' RBC (ex-1100 o x' N RBC • 1004 Raven Bend Ct Raven Bend Ct ` v fn RaV en Bend ct act Bend m fo r m � • • m U3 iK� i � • o - A d h RBC re- ,� N 0. .Ci 1v ° Google �. E. Figure 5 from section 1 -3(d): : Raven Bend is largely surrounded by medium-density (or more dense) land use neighborhoods Concern #3 - adjacent neighborhood density 1v12. 1uu4 1 Cross Timbers1004 rbr tNa/ Key takeaways 92' 917 913 1008 1009 Raven Bend is surrounded on 3.75 1001 909 933 ,�95 sides by medium-density or more- 1004 , 1005 dense land use (e.g. RPUD in 929 Shady •- 908 904 ad Oaks) 1199 "• 900 Shady 4 1 y o ) 925 Cross Timbers is low density; -- however, it only borders —100 feet of 1369 921 917 913 909 905 901 Raven Bend and is separated by "" Peytonville (a large-collector � L_21 10 0 916 � '-I throughway) ; 100.4 ! 1000 � 904 f �816 L kJ� 02 1200 1101 °��f�. goo 908 �cRaven Bend ` 1 817 L31uStine Ct 1 1� 904 c — 912 ° 13 1201 r 1001 901 900 c 816 914 915 905 1 — r l2 1200 812 SF1A-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL(Min 1 Ac Lot) + I r' 5r 817 • ••- Lakes ttlo tto8 1106 110411 1102 i aoe �1— _ ❑ L�JOA-SINGLE FA.MILYRESIDENTIAL(Min 20,000Sf / 1100 -• I ,� 818 E 03 —' RPUD- RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT is Travis Ct 800 Appendix The Kearneys have been trying to make capital improvements to their property and Raven Bend (to the benefit of all neighbors) since 2015 Kearney proposed property improvements DIRECTIONAL CONTROL LINE RECORD - 384.72' OWROL) MEAS, N 89' 56' DO' E - 384.92' t �� .P. c I MP • ••- • 1 — _" — �_ — — — ,s•aw 10.2• x ,ex I L11Y ,a/ Backyard improvements12• STRIP RESEVED A I • • • ILI40 n •.yr � w ./ o' • • • BRICK & F7tAME/ •• • ••- / RESIDEN(j • /1D.T / M0,LIV 1 24.7 LE W f MEAS. S 89' 33 28 W 1 co �W `�• 1 I� SET CAPPED 400 SURMCAM m"WICA nN ' RQ•bWW PROPEMONAL UN0 SWYM'DR, WZ3'1 CW?TVY TRW 1 16 Unfortunately, massive erosion and flooding from a developer caused the Kearneys to spend 7 years in litigation . . . Issues with developer Property line 71 12"+ of sediment in east-west swale River of water from detention pond and under wall 17 Point 1: a portion of the re-plat funds will be used to offset inflation of construction materials since lawsuit bids were created. The Kearney's spent 7 years in litigation with the developer and won a near-unanimous verdict on the 2 main charges' Developer litigation outcome (Tarrant County Cause No. 096-293017-17)1 . . -7o 7rinances Jury Charge - . Did the Shady Oaks Defendants divert or impound the natural flow of surface water or permit a diversion or Yes 1. Texas Water Code 11.086 impounding to continue in a manner that 2. Southlake Code of Ordinances, Sec. damaged Plaintiff's property? 9.5-65(g) Was the diversion or impoundment, or permitting the diversion of impoundment Yes to continue, intentional? Texas Water Code 11.086 Southlake Code of Ordinances, Sec. 9.5-65(g) No person may divert or impound the Diversion or impoundment: All drainage systems shall be designed to prevent the natural flow of surface waters in this diversion or impoundment of the natural flow of surface water in a manner that state, or permit a diversion damages the property of another by the flow of the water diverted or impounded. or impounding by him to continue, in a The director of public works shall place in each developer's agreement a manner that damages the property of provision requiring the developer to comply with all applicable laws, including, but another by the overflow of the not limited to, section 1(1)086, Texas Water Code. In addition, the director of water diverted or impounded. public works shall place on each plat that receives final approval, a statement that reads as follows: Compliance with the provisions of the city's storm drainage policy does not relieve a person of the responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to, section 1(1)086, Texas Water Code. 1. Since the Kearneys received a verdict in their favor in February-2022, the Kearneys have settled with the defendant Point 2: a portion of the re-plat funds will be used to tie the engineered solution into the City capital project. The City is in-work on a capital project that can partially alleviate issues on the Kearney property (once in-work modifications) Southlake capital project overview N H >oW — '_" �Y - •� \x; ;r,,IESTER DR �zo- Aj �_�5O Adobe Acrobat o��°� Document 0 / 4 Woa � i " ZWLU LU Ex* XTuacN -A Lc 5. �•�� � ~/ .•nor ,. ^�''' rsr SIDEx.Lx 1 .. * cxu TwrFP NLL r.E � � CNCN�EL•c �h �A FI �I�. nNL •aCE9 3+oo RAVEN BEND CT <�oo -- N PEYTONVILLE AVE _. ✓ s. _ <l' - --_ >r C Ylx ,yY N hP ra • _ 1, �"• � � � 7e ,� Ao� 03 19 Proceeds from the re-platted Kearney property will be re-invested in 5 initiatives Re-plat re-investment plan 1 . Offset the increase in construction costs (inflation of materials and labor) associated with remediation of flooding 2. Tie #1 into City of Southlake Capital project 3. Sidewalks on all public-facing sides of the new and existing property 4. Upgrade communal Raven Bend Court entry way and monument 5. Potential to invest in other jointly-derived communal Raven Bend Court upgrades (e.g. street signs, street lighting, etc.) © `.;rOUTLET c 4 We have sought concerns from our neighbors — what other concerns do you have/ see? The current Raven Bend neighborhood The re-platted 1100 RBC has 8 feet 1. Neighborhood density is zone low-density and by re-platting more corner-to-corner separation than 1100 RBC, is would create discontinuity the current neighborhood (ex-1100 in neighborhood appearance RBC) Yes, and any re-platting attempts would 2. Neighborhood covenants Do covenants allow for re-platting? follow the democratic process outlined in the covenants Allowing a move from low-density to Raven Bend is surrounded on 3.75 3. Adjacent neighborhood density medium-density will create a mismatch sides by medium-density or more-dense with adjacent neighborhoods land use (e.g. RPUD in Shady Oaks) Absolutely planning for sidewalks on all 4. Sidewalks Southlake residents love sidewalks! public-facing sides of the re-platted properties (per re-plat requirements) The new home will not match the current We will design the new house (and 5. Home design homes in Raven Bend Court update our current house) using a colonial or ranch style fagade We plan to repurpose -25% of the trees as lumber in the construction of our 6. Tree conservation Developing a new lot would require home. We have planted more than 20 removal of trees trees (nellie stevens) on the re-platted land to date and have a plan to plant 50+ more trees. 7. ?? Southlake Capital Improvement Project (CIP) analysis � •�'o; µam. <.� ,; • f t ^.l- . I ' D Z o r ip ;t o i Z o D o0.0 o O � o O : < I ,J 1,844-51 ft 1,600.00 OF 1,400*00 (t' Meastae distanc Click on the map to add to your path Total area: 0. .0: R Inlet 2 is responsible for -25K sq . ft. (or 0.57 acres) or, 4k �r r CO x Measure distance Click on the map to add to your path O O Total area:25,184.92 ft2(2,339.76 m2) ., Total distance:1,672.65 ft(509.83 m) 24 Inlet • • • for 1 % the volume of Inlet #11 : 4.74 acres r N .1 7 t_ s 1 . 61 : sq. Wdr lb sec�� Wi,�he Wince